Re posted so AUK gets it. BASTARDS
andy
Only 1 message in topic - view as tree
andy
Nov 27, 9:41 am show options
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: "andy" <rwill9...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: 27 Nov 2005 07:41:32 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 27 2005 9:41 am
Subject: Does AUK have the gonads to admit it is a stalking center ?
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Remove | Report Abuse
I challenge the unelected elite of AUK to admit the following
1. Your group is one of the worst abuse centers in the internet, bar
none
2. You automatically penalize anyone who is different since you have
unlimited angst for not having any professional success yourselves.
3. You also are the PKB losers of the internet. Anything you label me ,
or others you have put on your shit list, applies to yourselves,
FACTORIAL
4. Oh, and how many systems admins has AUK contacted today ? How
many PhD granting programs has AUK had its minions phone today ? How
many heads of departments were called kooks by AUKs losers, since they
refused to answer rediculous questions today ?
How many people have been labeled crazy by AUK today ? How many times
has AUK abused common courtesty ethics by making inexpert diagnosis
today?
How many marriage records has AUK published on the internet today ?
You are the scum of the Earth, AUK. Get it ? I hope you do. ALL of you.
Eat shit and die.
Art Deco
Would you like some cheese with your whine today?
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...
andy
expected. Par
for the course for a suck up to the AUK internet abuse center.
Aratzio
double secret probation because:
>1. Your group is one of the worst abuse centers in the internet, bar
>none
No, we are an excellent abuse center.
Finest Kind Abuse and Fish Market.
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae....@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
Art Deco
>I see it is impossible for you to take your head out of your ass. As I
>expected. Par
>for the course for a suck up to the AUK internet abuse center.
Wow, a top-posted, malformed kookrant. How unusual.
Aratzio
double secret probation because:
>I see it is impossible for
you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
Spaulding Greystoke
news:ct5ko1dtpfcttsbvf...@4ax.com:
> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" <rwil...@hotmail.com> got
> double secret probation because:
>
>>I see it is impossible for
>
> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
Yet you hide from mine.
You have been banned for the following reason:
You broke about every forum rule possible.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
rocky
>In article <Xns971B984AF...@207.14.113.17>, posted 27
>Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
>KILLFIL...@yahoo.com says...
>
>>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
>>news:ct5ko1dtpfcttsbvf...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" <rwil...@hotmail.com> got
>>> double secret probation because:
>>>
>>>>I see it is impossible for
>>>
>>> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
>>
>>Yet you hide from mine.
>
>Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to
>avoid killfiles.
>
>Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
dear k00ky kali, why do you k00ks need to post telling someone they
are plonked instead of just plonking them, also, what is the deal with
doing all that and then cutting the ng line? may i suggest you stop
doing what the voices in your head tell you to do and get a clue?
>Kali
Spaulding Greystoke
news:kutko11gk98g1v188...@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:21:25 GMT, Kali <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote:
>
>>In article <Xns971B984AF...@207.14.113.17>, posted 27
>>Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
>>KILLFIL...@yahoo.com says...
>>
>>>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
>>>news:ct5ko1dtpfcttsbvf...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" <rwil...@hotmail.com> got
>>>> double secret probation because:
>>>>
>>>>>I see it is impossible for
>>>>
>>>> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
>>>
>>>Yet you hide from mine.
>>
>>Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to
>>avoid killfiles.
Can't operate a killfile, eh? I change my nyms because I appear to have
more imagination than many of you.
The "kookhunters" are disinterested in my many kooky beliefs? How does
that work, again?
>>Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
>
> dear k00ky kali, why do you k00ks need to post telling someone they
> are plonked instead of just plonking them, also, what is the deal with
> doing all that and then cutting the ng line? may i suggest you stop
> doing what the voices in your head tell you to do and get a clue?
I find it a point of honor that I have an entire newsgroup in hiding.
rocky
<KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>rocky <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in
>news:kutko11gk98g1v188...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:21:25 GMT, Kali <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <Xns971B984AF...@207.14.113.17>, posted 27
>>>Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
>>>KILLFIL...@yahoo.com says...
>>>
>>>>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
>>>>news:ct5ko1dtpfcttsbvf...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" <rwil...@hotmail.com> got
>>>>> double secret probation because:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I see it is impossible for
>>>>>
>>>>> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
>>>>
>>>>Yet you hide from mine.
>>>
>>>Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to
>>>avoid killfiles.
>
>Can't operate a killfile, eh? I change my nyms because I appear to have
>more imagination than many of you.
you could have been more honest with her. you could have pointed out
that she can't use her brain, in comparison to not being able to use a
killfile, well, she got off way light.
>The "kookhunters" are disinterested in my many kooky beliefs? How does
>that work, again?
FUCK OFF, KOOK.
>>>Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
>>
>> dear k00ky kali, why do you k00ks need to post telling someone they
>> are plonked instead of just plonking them, also, what is the deal with
>> doing all that and then cutting the ng line? may i suggest you stop
>> doing what the voices in your head tell you to do and get a clue?
>
>I find it a point of honor that I have an entire newsgroup in hiding.
show off.
marika
rocky wrote:
> you could have been more honest with her.
I have heard that when people want people to know this, they say badger
bar
don't know what a badger bar is but ok
I think I heard that phrase on the SNL episode with Jon Heder
I watched every single second having forced myself to stay up
I haven't enjoyed SNL in years because it's been lameass for the last
20 years
the sketches were as lame as ever
fortunately though, Heder was as talented as you'd imagine in spite of
his very little bit of acting experience.
mk5000
"Repair it?
It didn't collapse. It sustained far more damage than any other
buildings
you could name.
But it didn't collapse. "--thundercat stevens
rocky
>
>rocky wrote:
>
>> you could have been more honest with her.
>
>
>I have heard that when people want people to know this, they say badger
>bar
>don't know what a badger bar is but ok
its at moments like this mr hillstrom is needed, he knows everything
about badgers you could ever want to know.
>I think I heard that phrase on the SNL episode with Jon Heder
>
>I watched every single second having forced myself to stay up
>
>I haven't enjoyed SNL in years because it's been lameass for the last
>20 years
>
>the sketches were as lame as ever
having never heard of the program, i'm in no possition to comment, all
i can say is spitting image is supposed to be coming back to tv here.
if it does and it was as cutting as in the 80's, tory blair is fucked.
>fortunately though, Heder was as talented as you'd imagine in spite of
>his very little bit of acting experience.
lister from red dwarf used to do some of the voices on spitting image.
Minerva
> On 27 Nov 2005 16:05:18 -0800, "marika" <marik...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >rocky wrote:
> >
> >> you could have been more honest with her.
> >
> >
> >I have heard that when people want people to know this, they say badger
> >bar
> >don't know what a badger bar is but ok
>
> its at moments like this mr hillstrom is needed, he knows everything
> about badgers you could ever want to know.
>
> >I think I heard that phrase on the SNL episode with Jon Heder
> >
> >I watched every single second having forced myself to stay up
> >
> >I haven't enjoyed SNL in years because it's been lameass for the last
> >20 years
> >
> >the sketches were as lame as ever
>
> having never heard of the program, i'm in no possition to comment, all
> i can say is spitting image is supposed to be coming back to tv here.
> if it does and it was as cutting as in the 80's, tory blair is fucked.
>
> >fortunately though, Heder was as talented as you'd imagine in spite of
> >his very little bit of acting experience.
>
> lister from red dwarf used to do some of the voices on spitting image.
Was it a comedy show? And who is Tory Blair? Some relative of Tony's?
[snecking last group for google limits]
rocky
<minerv...@mindspring.com> wrote:
both spitting image and red dwarf are comedy shows. spitting imgage
was a particularily funny satire of poloticians and polotics, red
dwarf is a favourate on cbs in the us, its a cult bbc comedy series
set in deep space on a mining ship.
tory blair is my pisstake out of tony blair with him being far from a
labour government prime minister, more like a tory in laybour
clouthing.
Everclear
> In article <kutko11gk98g1v188...@4ax.com>, posted
> Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:25:47 -0500, rocky
> ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org says...
>
> >On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:21:25 GMT, Kali <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <Xns971B984AF...@207.14.113.17>, posted 27
> > > Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
> > > KILLFIL...@yahoo.com says...
> > >
> >>>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
> > > > news:ct5ko1dtpfcttsbvf...@4ax.com:
> > > >
> >>>> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" <rwil...@hotmail.com> got
> >>>> double secret probation because:
> >>>>
> > > > > > I see it is impossible for
> >>>>
> >>>> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
> >>>
> > > > Yet you hide from mine.
> > >
> > > Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to
> > > avoid killfiles.
> > >
> > > Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
> >
> > dear k00ky kali, why do you k00ks need to post telling someone they
> > are plonked instead of just plonking them,
>
> Must kooks whine when plonked? Get over it and move on, I say.
>
> also, what is the deal with
> > doing all that and then cutting the ng line?
>
> You post where you want to post, and I'll post where I want to
> post. This concept seems simple to me, but let me know if you
> require further edification. It's important to me that you
> understand.
>
> may I suggest you stop
> > doing what the voices in your head tell you to do and get a clue?
>
> Your wit is stunning. In fact, I've never seen anything like it
> before on Usenet. (You're no doubt used to hearing this by now.)
> I'm honored that you'd share "The Best of rocky" with me. :-)
Nobody is saying you don't have the right to sneck newsgroups in your
replies, Kali. But the right thing to do is to point out whenever doing
it. You sneck groups silently, Kali. Even when you are fully aware that
the person to whom you're responding is reading the thread in the snecked
group. At least three candidates were accepted for COWARD OF THE MONTH
this year for doing the exact same thing.
Flonk & af added back.
Spaulding Greystoke
±
>
> In article <1133106604.432651.22760
> @g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, posted 27 Nov 2005 07:50:04 -
> 0800, andy rwil...@hotmail.com says...
>
> >Does AUK have the gonads to admit it is a stalking center ?
>
How's "Nutsack Fred" doing, Cuntli?
> >Only 1 message in topic - view as tree
> > andy
> > Nov 27, 9:41 am show options
> >
> >Newsgroups: alt.flame
> >From: "andy" <rwill9...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this author
> >Date: 27 Nov 2005 07:41:32 -0800
> >Local: Sun, Nov 27 2005 9:41 am
> >Subject: Does AUK have the gonads to admit it is a stalking center ?
> >Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
> >original | Remove | Report Abuse
> >
> >I challenge the unelected elite of AUK to admit the following
>
> I'm sort of elite and I'm reading/posting to AUK right now, same
> as you are. Do I qualify?
All k00kologists qualify as Lusers.
> >1. Your group is one of the worst abuse centers in the internet, bar
> >none
>
> One of the seven wondrous axes of evil in the world, I imagine,
> and it is widely known that AUK has a massive impact on the rest
> of Usenet. Just ask Mr. Formosa.
<titter>"seven wondrous axes of evil"?</titter>
> > How
> >many heads of departments were called kooks by AUKs losers, since they
> >refused to answer rediculous questions today ?
>
> (You misspelled ridiculous.)
Oh, my!
> >How many people have been labeled crazy by AUK today ? How many times
> >has AUK abused common courtesty ethics by making inexpert diagnosis
> >today?
>
> I don't know, but I've been diagnosed as schizophrenic,
> schizoaffective, dissociative, etc. by several kooks. Jealous?
How about listing the diseases and mental problems medical professionals
have diagnosed you as having? You've previously posted about it, it
shouldn't be a problem.
> >How many marriage records has AUK published on the internet today ?
>
> I don't know. How many? Some of your kook pals in a.f are teh
> stalkers who like to out personal info about their targets. Ask
> them. None of them are capable of reasoned argument without
> resorting to ad hominem and threats of outing/stalking within
> the first 100 words. This is what limited minds do.
?
> >You are the scum of the Earth, AUK. Get it ? I hope you do. ALL of you.
>
> Does that include you? You're posting and reading here, after
> all.
>
> >Eat shit and die.
>
> Such a not nice thing to say to a lady on a Sunday afternoon.
You aint no lady, bitch.
> I'd be offended if this were coming from a reasonable person.
Go felch Courtney Love, you tedious twat.
> Don't know if you'll get this. I don't post to a.f. because I
> find no one's comments there worthy of my time or interest for
> the above stated reasons.
___ ___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ / /\ /__/\ /\__\
/::\ \ /::\ \ / /::\ \ \:\ /:/ /
/:/\ \ \ /:/\:\__\ / /:/\:\ \ \:\ /:/__/
_\:\~\ \ \ /:/ /:/ / / /::\ \:\ _____\__\:\ /::\__\____
/\ \:\ \ \__\ /:/_/:/ / /__/:/\:\_\:\ /__/::::::::\ /:/\:::::\__\
\:\ \:\ \/__/ \:\/:/ / \__\/ \:\/:/ \ \:\~~\~~\/ \/_|:|~~|~
\:\ \:\__\ \::/__/ \__\::/ \ \:\ ~~~ |:| |
\:\/:/ / \:\ \ / /:/ \ \:\ |:| |
\::/ / \:\__\ / /:/ \ \:\ |:| |
\/__/ \/__/ \__\/ \__\/ \|__|
>
> Kali
> --
> "But I don't want to go among mad people,"
> Alice remarked. "Oh, you can't help that,"
> said the Cat, "we're all mad here. I'm mad.
> You're mad." -Lewis Carroll
-------
/ \
/ \ /-----\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,
±
Quivering Quakers.
>
> --
> http://www.bedoper.com
>
> You have been banned for the following reason:
> You broke about every forum rule possible.
>
> Date the ban will be lifted: Never
>
> http://www.bautforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19
±
What fucknozzles AUK-Tards are.
> Flonk & af added back.
Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger
"ą" <h0plib...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:438AC008...@hotmail.com...
> Kali wrote:
>>
>> In article <1133106604.432651.22760
>> @g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, posted 27 Nov 2005 07:50:04 -
>> 0800, andy rwil...@hotmail.com says...
>>
>> >Does AUK have the gonads to admit it is a stalking center ?
>>
>> Testicles are for males. Usually. Do you have teh gonads?
>
> How's "Nutsack Fred" doing, Cuntli?
>
>> >Only 1 message in topic - view as tree
>> > andy
>> > Nov 27, 9:41 am show options
>> >
>> >Newsgroups: alt.flame
>> >From: "andy" <rwill9...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this author
>> >Date: 27 Nov 2005 07:41:32 -0800
>> >Local: Sun, Nov 27 2005 9:41 am
>> >Subject: Does AUK have the gonads to admit it is a stalking center ?
>> >Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
>> >original | Remove | Report Abuse
>> >
>> >I challenge the unelected elite of AUK to admit the following
>>
>> I'm sort of elite and I'm reading/posting to AUK right now, same
>> as you are. Do I qualify?
>
> All k00kologists qualify as Lusers.
Those are who don't know enough for creating, more than enough at rotting.
>
>> >1. Your group is one of the worst abuse centers in the internet, bar
>> >none
>>
>> One of the seven wondrous axes of evil in the world, I imagine,
>> and it is widely known that AUK has a massive impact on the rest
>> of Usenet. Just ask Mr. Formosa.
>
> <titter>"seven wondrous axes of evil"?</titter>
He learns from Bu$h fast.
Kaliflower is the closest he get to be a flower.
Lester Mosley
marika wrote:
> rocky wrote:
>
> > you could have been more honest with her.
>
>
> I have heard that when people want people to know this, they say badger
> bar
> don't know what a badger bar is but ok
>
> I think I heard that phrase on the SNL episode with Jon Heder
>
> I watched every single second having forced myself to stay up
>
> I haven't enjoyed SNL in years because it's been lameass for the last
> 20 years
Agreeded.. It is okay now and then.. It is really hit & miss.
> the sketches were as lame as ever
I could write better sketches in my sleep.. but again I am a nobody and
they woudltn even consider me as a writer.
> fortunately though, Heder was as talented as you'd imagine in spite of
> his very little bit of acting experience.
>
Are you a sophist or a nihilstic sophist?
Spaulding Greystoke
news:1133174599....@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>
> marika wrote:
>> rocky wrote:
>>
>> > you could have been more honest with her.
>>
>>
>> I have heard that when people want people to know this, they say
badger
>> bar
>> don't know what a badger bar is but ok
>>
>> I think I heard that phrase on the SNL episode with Jon Heder
>>
>> I watched every single second having forced myself to stay up
>>
>> I haven't enjoyed SNL in years because it's been lameass for the last
>> 20 years
>
> Agreeded.. It is okay now and then.. It is really hit & miss.
>
>> the sketches were as lame as ever
>
> I could write better sketches in my sleep.. but again I am a nobody and
> they woudltn even consider me as a writer.
You wouldn't blow Lorne Michaels.
>> fortunately though, Heder was as talented as you'd imagine in spite of
>> his very little bit of acting experience.
>>
>
>
> Are you a sophist or a nihilstic sophist?
Is she a good witch, or a bad witch.
Peter J Ross
alt.usenet.kooks:
> 1. Your group is one of the worst abuse centers in the internet, bar
> none
ONE of the worst, bar NONE?
PJR :-)
--
Nemo hibericam exspectat inquisitionem.
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
<http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/>
Daedalus
wrote:
>On 27 Nov 2005 07:50:04 -0800, andy <rwil...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> 1. Your group is one of the worst abuse centers in the internet, bar
>> none
>
>ONE of the worst, bar NONE?
>
>PJR :-)
First there is a mountain, then there is no mountain, then there is.
Jade
Daedalus
>Does AUK have the gonads to admit it is a stalking center ?
There is no stalking here. You are the root of the problem. I suggest
you leaf quietly, ya fruit.
I sense you are upset with your station at the bottom of the food
chain.
*chomp*
Jade
rocky
wrote:
it would seem that kali is a natural candiate for yellow spined white
feather collecting coward of the month award.
anyone care to second or third her so she's on the ballot?
rocky
>In article <kutko11gk98g1v188...@4ax.com>, posted
>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:25:47 -0500, rocky
>ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org says...
>
>>On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:21:25 GMT, Kali <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <Xns971B984AF...@207.14.113.17>, posted 27
>>>Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
>>>KILLFIL...@yahoo.com says...
>>>
>>>>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
>>>>news:ct5ko1dtpfcttsbvf...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" <rwil...@hotmail.com> got
>>>>> double secret probation because:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I see it is impossible for
>>>>>
>>>>> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
>>>>
>>>>Yet you hide from mine.
>>>
>>>Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to
>>>avoid killfiles.
>>>
>>>Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
>>
>>dear k00ky kali, why do you k00ks need to post telling someone they
>>are plonked instead of just plonking them,
>
>Must kooks whine when plonked? Get over it and move on, I say.
>
> also, what is the deal with
>>doing all that and then cutting the ng line?
>
>You post where you want to post, and I'll post where I want to
>post. This concept seems simple to me, but let me know if you
how does that relate to the auk philosophy of bitching when a k00k
cuts auk from the x-post line. does auks inhabitans have an usenet
wide recognized special excemption certificate to allow such high
hypocrosy go unchallanged?
>require further edification. It's important to me that you
>understand.
you are not equiped to enlighten anyone on any subject, you can't even
use a killfile, what could such a pathetic person like you have to
offer anyone about anything, oh learned one?
> may I suggest you stop
>>doing what the voices in your head tell you to do and get a clue?
>
>Your wit is stunning. In fact, I've never seen anything like it
>before on Usenet. (You're no doubt used to hearing this by now.)
>I'm honored that you'd share "The Best of rocky" with me. :-)
a k00k says what? nothing interesting by the look of it.
>Kali
rocky
Ranger" <yyyiii...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"Kali" <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote in message
>news:MPG.1df413935...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <kutko11gk98g1v188...@4ax.com>, posted
>> Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:25:47 -0500, rocky
>> ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org says...
>>
>>>On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:21:25 GMT, Kali <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <Xns971B984AF...@207.14.113.17>, posted 27
>>>>Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
>>>>KILLFIL...@yahoo.com says...
>>>>
>>>>>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:ct5ko1dtpfcttsbvf...@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" <rwil...@hotmail.com> got
>>>>>> double secret probation because:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I see it is impossible for
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yet you hide from mine.
>>>>
>>>>Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to
>>>>avoid killfiles.
>>>>
>>>>Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
>>>
>>>dear k00ky kali, why do you k00ks need to post telling someone they
>>>are plonked instead of just plonking them,
>>
>> Must kooks whine when plonked? Get over it and move on, I say.
>>
>> also, what is the deal with
>>>doing all that and then cutting the ng line?
>>
>> You post where you want to post, and I'll post where I want to
>> post. This concept seems simple to me, but let me know if you
>> require further edification. It's important to me that you
>> understand.
>
>Do you think Kali sounds like a man or an English muffin?
yes.
>>
>> may I suggest you stop
>>>doing what the voices in your head tell you to do and get a clue?
>>
>> Your wit is stunning. In fact, I've never seen anything like it
>> before on Usenet. (You're no doubt used to hearing this by now.)
>> I'm honored that you'd share "The Best of rocky" with me. :-)
>>
marika
Spaulding Greystoke wrote:
>
> You wouldn't blow Lorne Michaels.
>
but by that time, I
may feel entitled to a break. And it would be a great way to work in
a
dinner . . . . .
mk5000
"being married to Norman Lear - the good thing about it is that he's so
respected. He's a good kind of famous. Not like a celebrity"--Lyn
Davis Lear
marika
Lester Mosley wrote:
>
>but again I am a nobody and
> they woudltn even consider me as a writer.
its a cousin
>
> > fortunately though, Heder was as talented as you'd imagine in spite of
> > his very little bit of acting experience.
> >
>
>
> Are you a sophist or a nihilstic sophist?
Here's the particulars
I will be going because I have no choice
if you think you will enjoy it, please attend with me
mk5000
"I'm going to have a one-woman show in Europe, telling stories and
playing music. When I put that together I'm going to be thinking about
the stories that will help reunite the human race. I just want to be
around all that good clothing. I remember seeing a bum in Paris with
the greatest gabardne coat and I'm thinking, Look at that
coat"--Pauletta Washington
marika
rocky wrote:
>
> both spitting image and red dwarf are comedy shows. spitting imgage
> was a particularily funny satire of poloticians and polotics, red
> dwarf is a favourate on cbs in the us, its a cult bbc comedy series
> set in deep space on a mining ship.
>
> tory blair is my pisstake out of tony blair with him being far from a
> labour government prime minister, more like a tory in laybour
> clouthing.
>
So-o-o do those 2 lines go together? Either way is fine with me.
I will look out for it. THANKS!
mk5000
"That's the shot everyone remembers where Lawrence Taylor hits him.
You knew immediately that that was it for Joe Theismann"--John Madden
marika
Minerva wrote:
>
> Was it a comedy show?
It sounds cool.
say no if you are not into that sort of thing
more social life as it erupts
>And who is Tory Blair?
I was just about to write the same thing but the explanation is funny
it's a cousin from europe,\
>Some relative of Tony's?
>
he's a violin virtuoso related to Tori Amos
mk5000
"when people watch football, they don't want to look up words to figure
out what they mean. Our game is about guys running into one
anoather"--Joe Theismann
Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger
"rocky" <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in message
news:5e9no1hedf0arggsm...@4ax.com...
Do you think Kali would dance like a wolf or French Fries?
rocky
Ranger" <yyyiii...@yahoo.com> wrote:
i think the french fries would dine on what she passes for a soul.
Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger
Let her soul be kaliflower and let freedom fries eat it now while there're
hot.
Real Friendly Neighborhood Vote Ranger
"Grand Moff Robert Buchanan" <rbuc...@neubauten.org> wrote in message
news:YLajf.786$kV7...@news02.roc.ny...
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:50:21 GMT, rocky <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org>
> posted something accessible as
> news:be9no1l1adlgi2jl6...@4ax.com in alt.usenet.kooks,
> selections of which I respond to below:
The Kook run kook election is totally a hoax.
>
> FOAD, choad.
>
> --
> Robert Buchanan
> Grand Moff of <http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
> Custodian of <http://del.icio.us/rbuchanan>
> Master of Mindy (arf)
>
> Quote of the week:
>
> "Gee.... Porn is much more than that. It is the pillar of every
> publishinging revolution in history. Usenet may be gone soon, it would be
> easy to get rid of."
>
> -Tom "Tosser" Bishop, <438110cd$0$20265$8f2e...@news.shared-secrets.com>
knoxy
Ka...@lart.meow says...
> In article <Xns971B984AF...@207.14.113.17>, posted 27
> Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
> KILLFIL...@yahoo.com says...
>
> >Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
> >news:ct5ko1dtpfcttsbvf...@4ax.com:
> >
> >> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" <rwil...@hotmail.com> got
> >> double secret probation because:
> >>
> >>>I see it is impossible for
> >>
> >> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
> >
> >Yet you hide from mine.
>
> Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to
> avoid killfiles.
>
> Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
>
>
So you're not only a hypocrite, you can't even use a killfile correctly.
Jason don't change his email addy, so it's quite easy to keep him in a
killfile if you're not a complete idiot.
--
knoxy
mhm34x10
smeeter #6
#6 on mimus wanted poster list
"The Internet is a gateway to get on the net."
Bob Dole
"Do it anyway. You are being a kook so you are not allowed to make
decisions.
You'll feel better that way."
Necco calling me a kook in message id Yuxcf.12584$cg.1...@news02.roc.ny
knoxy
says...
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:50:21 GMT, rocky <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org>
> posted something accessible as
> news:be9no1l1adlgi2jl6...@4ax.com in alt.usenet.kooks,
> selections of which I respond to below:
>
>
>
Oh my, what a pathetic attempt to flame! Let me guess, you're on Kali's
hottie lits... <snigger>
It's getting really hard to tell the kookologists and the kooks apart,
you're all acting the same. Of course, when one of you do something
cowardly like snecking the groupline so the op can't see the reply, then
it's oh so different from when a kook does it.
Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations. It
just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last say if it
goes on the ballots or not. I've never seen any rules that says that
"semi-literate idiots" can't nominate, in that case, half of AUK would
be unable to do so.
knoxy
ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org says...
would never let her know how fucking kooky she is.
knoxy
Ka...@lart.meow says...
> In article <K8G6B6F...@127.0.0.1>, posted Mon, 28 Nov 2005
> 01:36:21 +0000, Everclear ever...@127.0.0.1 says...
> > You sneck groups silently, Kali.
>
> newsgroup changes, you know.
>
You like to announce your plonks?!?!?! Oh my god, you really are a kook!
> Even when you are fully aware that
> >the person to whom you're responding is reading the thread in the snecked
> >group.
>
> I don't think there's a soul in a.f who expects me to post
> there, my friend. I've made my position on this crystal clear.
> That said, I'll try to be more courteous in future.
>
Of course no one expects you to post in a.f. We all know you run away as
soon as someone flames you.
> At least three candidates were accepted for COWARD OF THE
> MONTH
> >this year for doing the exact same thing.
>
> So nominate me, but it's not the same thing, exactly or
> otherwise.
>
Why don't you tell us mere mortals what the difference are between a
kook snecking the groupline and you doing it. I for one, really can't
see the difference.
> >Flonk & af added back.
>
> [af1]
>
> Kali
Peter J Ross
alt.usenet.kooks:
> Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations.
Correct, except for some exceptions that don't apply in this case.
> It just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last
> say if it goes on the ballots or not.
Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:08 -0000, knoxy <kn...@post.com> wrote in
>alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations.
>
>Correct, except for some exceptions that don't apply in this case.
>
>> It just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last
>> say if it goes on the ballots or not.
>
>Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
>those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
>
>
>PJR :-)
Did your *mumsie* tell you to say that, pedey?
I nominate Pedey J. Ross for AUKtard Coward of the Month for weaseling
and not accepting nominations.
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae....@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
Peter J Ross
wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:35:15 GMT, Peter J Ross <p...@kookbusters.org>
> transparently proposed:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:08 -0000, knoxy <kn...@post.com> wrote in
>> alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations.
>>
>> Correct, except for some exceptions that don't apply in this case.
>>
>>> It just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last
>>> say if it goes on the ballots or not.
>>
>> Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
>> those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
>>
>> PJR :-)
>
> Did your *mumsie* tell you to say that, pedey?
>
> I nominate Pedey J. Ross for AUKtard Coward of the Month for weaseling
> and not accepting nominations.
Why did you hide your nomination from
alt.some.boring.group.that.nobody.reads, AUKtard? Hmmmm?
Spaulding Greystoke
news:slrndorhn...@nntp.petitmorte.net:
> Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
> those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
<snicker>
rocky
>>> it would seem that
you can only deal with the first four word of a post. use your
killfile, you'll look less like a kali assuming you can use it.
>> you're a semi-literate idiot who thinks he can nominate somebody.
mr buchanan, either you are on kali's hottie list or you have a
passion for lost causes and skunks. which one is it?
btw where did you get this k00ky belief that i'm not entitled to
nominate somebody for an award?
rocky
wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:08 -0000, knoxy <kn...@post.com> wrote in
>alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations.
>
>Correct, except for some exceptions that don't apply in this case.
>
>> It just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last
>> say if it goes on the ballots or not.
>
>Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
>those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
none the less k00ky kali is a coward, snipping alt.flame from the
x-post line is the same as a k00k snipping auk, kali seems to be
oblivious to this and likes to cry about k00ks doing it. maybe
meatplow should do a line in hypocrosy meters, i'm sure kali would buy
one.
>PJR :-)
rocky
it would seem one of her suitors, neigh sekret hottie list member, has
otterd himself, he's a charming young knight in shining armour, Grand
Moff Robert Buchanan, is his name. he has come to the poor damsles
defence. it would seem kali isn't big enough to look after herself.
fucking coward.
rocky
>In article <slrndorhn...@nntp.petitmorte.net>, posted Wed,
>30 Nov 2005 15:35:15 GMT, Peter J Ross p...@kookbusters.org
>says...
>
>>On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:08 -0000, knoxy <kn...@post.com> wrote in
>>alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations.
>>
>>Correct, except for some exceptions that don't apply in this case.
>>
>>> It just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last
>>> say if it goes on the ballots or not.
>>
>>Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
>>those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
>>
>>
>>PJR :-)
>
>Since when does an idiot chain of ignored Kali humpers
>constitute a flame war, AUKtard?
kali humpers? that could be anyone, after all you are the auk bike.
>Kali
rocky
>In article <mc9no1p39fr41ijls...@4ax.com>, posted
>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:50:11 -0500, rocky
>ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org says...
>
>>On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:04:25 GMT, Kali <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>a k00k says what? nothing interesting by the look of it.
>
>So uninteresting you can't stop posting about me.
you are an object of riddicule, no more no less. you are more than
welcome to fantasize about being realy important to me if it helps
you.
Art Deco
>From : Kali <Ka...@lart.meow>
>Message-ID : <MPG.1df7f5344...@news.west.earthlink.net>
>
>
>>Since when does.. SNIP
>
>
>How many people have you x-posted and nominated outof spp during a slagoff huh
>?
>
>
>Uncountable..
Oh look, Asterisks is whining again. How unusual.
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...
Bill Cleere
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:38:17 GMT, rocky <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org>
> posted something accessible as
> news:rr2to1di2kk3f8f1h...@4ax.com in alt.usenet.kooks,
> selections of which I respond to below:
>
>> otterd himself, he's a charming young knight in shining armour, Grand
>> Moff Robert Buchanan, is his name.
>
> away from him.
You certainly know a thing or two about running away,
Spanky.
Found any more "contemporary" composers who've been dead
for 75 years, Grand Muff?
>> he has come to the poor damsles defence.
>
> Actually, I've been trying to call you to the carpet for your endless
> semi-
> literate obsessing over Kali. The trouble is, you keep running away.
mheh
>> it would seem kali isn't big enough to look after herself.
>> fucking coward.
>
> You're one to talk, spankard.
mheh
-- Bill Cleere
"I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing
an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal)
±
>
> In article <slrndorhn...@nntp.petitmorte.net>, posted Wed,
> 30 Nov 2005 15:35:15 GMT, Peter J Ross p...@kookbusters.org
> says...
>
> >alt.usenet.kooks:
> >
> >> Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations.
> >
> >Correct, except for some exceptions that don't apply in this case.
> >
> >> It just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last
> >> say if it goes on the ballots or not.
> >
> >Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
> >those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
> >
> >
> >PJR :-)
>
> constitute a flame war, AUKtard?
>
Stay the fuck out of alt.flame, Cunt.
> --
> "But I don't want to go among mad people,"
> Alice remarked. "Oh, you can't help that,"
> said the Cat, "we're all mad here. I'm mad.
> You're mad." -Lewis Carroll
-------
/ \
/ \ /-----\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,
Peter J Ross
wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
> From : Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
> Message-ID : <jeiro155e37vpro60...@4ax.com>
>
>> I nominate Pedey J. Ross for AUKtard Coward of the Month for weaseling
>> and not accepting nominations
>
> Well done *slut*, I *second* that
Thare's always *one* who bites.
Peter J Ross
<ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
> snipping auk
No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
entertainment.
Peter J Ross
<mhm2...@meow.flonk> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:25:47 -0500, rocky gibbered out like a howler
> monkey:
>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:21:25 GMT, Kali wrote:
>>> In article, posted 27 Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke says...
>>>> Aratzio wrote:
>>>>> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" got double secret probation
>>>>> because:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I see it is impossible for
>>>>>
>>>>> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
>>>>
>>>> Yet you hide from mine.
>>>
>>> Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to avoid
>>> killfiles.
>>>
>>> Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
>>
>> dear k00ky kali, why do you k00ks need to post telling someone they are
>> plonked instead of just plonking them, also, what is the deal with doing
>> all that and then cutting the ng line? may i suggest you stop doing what
>> the voices in your head tell you to do and get a clue?
>
> Well, informing someone of their killfiled status may be considered a
> formal politeness, a rudely dismissive smack, or even somewhere
> in-between...
*plonk*
Peter J Ross
<rbuc...@neubauten.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:28:35 GMT, Peter J Ross <p...@kookbusters.org> posted
> something accessible as news:slrndotgj...@nntp.petitmorte.net in
> alt.usenet.kooks, selections of which I respond to below:
>
>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:42 -0500, rocky
>> <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
>>> snipping auk
>>
>> No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
>> entertainment.
>
> Careful, PJR! Ari might claim a spank on you, and then where will you be?
I expect I'll be in alt.flame, enjoying the annual free floorshow
known as the alt.flame awards.
Spaulding Greystoke
@hail.eris.flonk.meow.all.hail.discordia.meow.flonk.mockery.demon:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:25:47 -0500, rocky gibbered out like a howler
> monkey:
>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:21:25 GMT, Kali wrote:
>>>In article, posted 27 Nov 2005 20:58:47 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
says...
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>> On 27 Nov 2005 10:24:41 -0800, "andy" got double secret probation
>>>>> because:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I see it is impossible for
>>>>>
>>>>> you to discern the fact *we* laugh at your kookiness.
>>>>
>>>>Yet you hide from mine.
>>>
>>>Disinterest != fear, oh genius who constantly changes nyms to avoid
>>>killfiles.
>>>
>>>Plonky again :) Nothing personal, of course.
>>
>> dear k00ky kali, why do you k00ks need to post telling someone they
are
>> plonked instead of just plonking them, also, what is the deal with
doing
>> all that and then cutting the ng line? may i suggest you stop doing
what
>> the voices in your head tell you to do and get a clue?
>
> Well, informing someone of their killfiled status may be considered a
> formal politeness, a rudely dismissive smack, or even somewhere
> in-between...
>
While at the same time snipping the group line, insuring they won't see
it?
knoxy
Ka...@lart.meow says...
> In article <rr2to1di2kk3f8f1h...@4ax.com>, posted
> Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:38:17 -0500, rocky
> pills. I would nominate the Hotties Lits for the HL&S Award if
> it weren't my own trolliscious creation.
>
> So, ignoramus, who is Brad Jesness, and what is the history and
> meaning of the hotties list? I'd hesitate to offer a clue so
> soon, but in your case it's a non-issue.
>
Brad Jesness is someone AUK has been obsessed with for years.
Why would anyone else give a shit about him? I sure know that I don't
and I don't really care about the history of your hottie lits. Nothing
can change the fact that it's beyond pathetic for a grown woman to post
about her hottie lits.
> Ahem:
>
> I only see 7 posts about me in the past hour. Stop slacking. :(
>
> ** --> [alt.flame] <-- **
>
> Kali
>
You're so sad. You crave attention and when you get it, you whine like a
baby. Aren't you lucky that they boys in AUK run to your defence every
time you fuck up?
--
knoxy
mhm34x10
smeeter #6
#6 on mimus wanted poster list
"The Internet is a gateway to get on the net."
Bob Dole
"Do it anyway. You are being a kook so you are not allowed to make
decisions.
You'll feel better that way."
Necco calling me a kook in message id Yuxcf.12584$cg.1...@news02.roc.ny
knoxy
says...
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:08 -0000, knoxy <kn...@post.com> wrote in
> alt.usenet.kooks:
>
> > Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations.
>
> Correct, except for some exceptions that don't apply in this case.
>
> > It just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last
> > say if it goes on the ballots or not.
>
> Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
> those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
>
>
> PJR :-)
>
flamewar. I like you Peter, but you all show what a bunch of hypocrites
you are in AUK, when you give people kook awards for certain behaviour
and then ignore when one of your own do exactly the same thing over and
over again. I know Kali claims that it's different when she does it, but
I've yet to see any explanation to why and how etc. Maybe you would like
to enlighten me on that issue.
knoxy
says...> posted something accessible as
> news:rr2to1di2kk3f8f1h...@4ax.com in alt.usenet.kooks,
> selections of which I respond to below:
>
> away from him.
>
made?
> > he has come to the poor damsles defence.
>
> Actually, I've been trying to call you to the carpet for your endless semi-
> literate obsessing over Kali. The trouble is, you keep running away.
>
Endless obsession? You have a funny definition of things in AUK.
> > it would seem kali isn't big enough to look after herself.
> > fucking coward.
>
> You're one to talk, spankard.
>
--
Francisco Pizarro
> Kali wrote:
> >
> > In article <1133106604.432651.22760
> > @g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, posted 27 Nov 2005 07:50:04 -
> > 0800, andy rwil...@hotmail.com says...
> >
> > >Does AUK have the gonads to admit it is a stalking center ?
> >
> > Testicles are for males. Usually. Do you have teh gonads?
>
> How's "Nutsack Fred" doing, Cuntli?
>
> > >Only 1 message in topic - view as tree
> > > andy
> > > Nov 27, 9:41 am show options
> > >
> > >Newsgroups: alt.flame
> > >From: "andy" <rwill9...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this author
> > >Date: 27 Nov 2005 07:41:32 -0800
> > >Local: Sun, Nov 27 2005 9:41 am
> > >Subject: Does AUK have the gonads to admit it is a stalking center ?
> > >Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
> > >original | Remove | Report Abuse
> > >
> > >I challenge the unelected elite of AUK to admit the following
> >
> > I'm sort of elite and I'm reading/posting to AUK right now, same
> > as you are. Do I qualify?
>
> All k00kologists qualify as Lusers.
>
> > >1. Your group is one of the worst abuse centers in the internet, bar
> > >none
> >
> > One of the seven wondrous axes of evil in the world, I imagine,
> > and it is widely known that AUK has a massive impact on the rest
> > of Usenet. Just ask Mr. Formosa.
>
> <titter>"seven wondrous axes of evil"?</titter>
>
> > > How
> > >many heads of departments were called kooks by AUKs losers, since they
> > >refused to answer rediculous questions today ?
> >
> > (You misspelled ridiculous.)
>
> Oh, my!
>
> > >How many people have been labeled crazy by AUK today ? How many times
> > >has AUK abused common courtesty ethics by making inexpert diagnosis
> > >today?
> >
> > I don't know, but I've been diagnosed as schizophrenic,
> > schizoaffective, dissociative, etc. by several kooks. Jealous?
>
> How about listing the diseases and mental problems medical professionals
> have diagnosed you as having? You've previously posted about it, it
> shouldn't be a problem.
) ~ ~ GONG ~ ~ (
I agree with this post.
> > >How many marriage records has AUK published on the internet today ?
> >
> > I don't know. How many? Some of your kook pals in a.f are teh
> > stalkers who like to out personal info about their targets. Ask
> > them. None of them are capable of reasoned argument without
> > resorting to ad hominem and threats of outing/stalking within
> > the first 100 words. This is what limited minds do.
>
> ?
>
> > >You are the scum of the Earth, AUK. Get it ? I hope you do. ALL of you.
> >
> > Does that include you? You're posting and reading here, after
> > all.
> >
> > >Eat shit and die.
> >
> > Such a not nice thing to say to a lady on a Sunday afternoon.
>
> You aint no lady, bitch.
>
> > I'd be offended if this were coming from a reasonable person.
>
> Go felch Courtney Love, you tedious twat.
>
> > Don't know if you'll get this. I don't post to a.f. because I
> > find no one's comments there worthy of my time or interest for
> > the above stated reasons.
>
> ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
> /\ \ /\ \ / /\ /__/\ /\__\
> /::\ \ /::\ \ / /::\ \ \:\ /:/ /
> /:/\ \ \ /:/\:\__\ / /:/\:\ \ \:\ /:/__/
> _\:\~\ \ \ /:/ /:/ / / /::\ \:\ _____\__\:\ /::\__\____
> /\ \:\ \ \__\ /:/_/:/ / /__/:/\:\_\:\ /__/::::::::\ /:/\:::::\__\
> \:\ \:\ \/__/ \:\/:/ / \__\/ \:\/:/ \ \:\~~\~~\/ \/_|:|~~|~
> \:\ \:\__\ \::/__/ \__\::/ \ \:\ ~~~ |:| |
> \:\/:/ / \:\ \ / /:/ \ \:\ |:| |
> \::/ / \:\__\ / /:/ \ \:\ |:| |
> \/__/ \/__/ \__\/ \__\/ \|__|
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Kali
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:13:28 +1000, Professeur Von TwoSteps OA <>
>wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> From : Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>> Message-ID : <jeiro155e37vpro60...@4ax.com>
>>
>>> I nominate Pedey J. Ross for AUKtard Coward of the Month for weaseling
>>> and not accepting nominations
>>
>> Well done *slut*, I *second* that
>
>Thare's always *one* who bites.
>
>PJR :-)
*unfortunately* *this* *one* *is* *steeupud-der* *than* *most* *so*
*it* *does* *not* *really* *count*.
--
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae....@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:42 -0500, rocky
><ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
>> snipping auk
>
>No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
>entertainment.
>
>
>PJR :-)
Besides which, alt.lame has their own awards and are quite welcome to
nominate AUK denizens for whatever award the snuhtards wish.
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>From : Peter J Ross <p...@kookbusters.org>
>Message-ID : <slrndotgj...@nntp.petitmorte.net>
>
>
>>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:42 -0500, rocky
>><ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
>>> snipping auk
>>
>>No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
>>entertainment.
>>
>>
>>PJR :-)
>
>
>I hope your rules choke you
>
>
>Stoopid pommie hypocrite
*snicker*
03:15:38 GMT
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:42 -0500, rocky
> <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
>> snipping auk
>
> No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
> entertainment.
I dearly hope this becomes accepted wisdom among all the stultified
flame victims over there in kook land. I can see it now:
KOOK HUNTER
"Drone snuhtard drone drone fucknozzle drone alt.lame slobber drone."
ALT.FLAMER
"Fuckhead."
KOOK HUNTER
"alt.lame snipped. Neener, neener."
ALT.FLAMER
"This vexes me so. [whistles a happy tune]"
--
Ari <as...@despammed.com>
"An Aquarius with Libra rising, eh? You are almost certainly a very
handsome young man. Highly intelligent, charming and sophisticated."
-- Kerro, astrology-stud
±
> >Ka...@lart.meow says...
> >> In article <301120051911465065%art_...@127.0.0.1>, posted Wed,
> >> 30 Nov 2005 19:11:46 -0700, Art Deco art_...@127.0.0.1 says...
> >>
> >> >Kali <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>In article <rr2to1di2kk3f8f1h...@4ax.com>, posted
> >> >>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:38:17 -0500, rocky
> >> >>ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org says...
> >> >>
> >> >>pills. I would nominate the Hotties Lits for the HL&S Award if
> >> >>it weren't my own trolliscious creation.
> >> >>
> >> >>So, ignoramus, who is Brad Jesness, and what is the history and
> >> >>meaning of the hotties list? I'd hesitate to offer a clue so
> >> >>soon, but in your case it's a non-issue.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>I only see 7 posts about me in the past hour. Stop slacking. :(
> >> >>
> >> >>** --> [alt.flame] <-- **
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't know who he is, but he appears to be auditioning for the
> >> part of Kali's holiday '05 fan bjoi.
> >>
> >> [alt.flame] <-- would have been snecked if it had been included
> >>
> >> Kali
> >>
> >So not only do you enjoy announcing your plonks, you also enjoy
> >announcing nonexistent group snecking? When will AUK wake up and realize
> >that you're a kook?
>
> From: rocky <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org>
> Message-ID: <rr2to1di2kk3f8f1h...@4ax.com>
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@clara.net (please include full headers)
>
> From: knoxy <kn...@post.com>
> Message-ID: <MPG.1df8ff3ae...@news.clara.net>
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@clara.net (please include full headers)
>
> Dirty socks perhaps?
You'd have to wake up pretty early in the morn to fool Artie, I'd say.
>
> --
> Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
> Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
>
> "The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
> both male and female genitalia."
>
> "Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
> with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
>
> -- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
>
> "I am a sean being from another planet."
> -- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...
±
>
> In article <slrndorhn...@nntp.petitmorte.net>, p...@kookbusters.org
> says...
> > On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:08 -0000, knoxy <kn...@post.com> wrote in
> > alt.usenet.kooks:
> >
> > > Btw, I was under the impression that anyone can make nominations.
> >
> > Correct, except for some exceptions that don't apply in this case.
> >
> > > It just have to be seconded and the vote wrangler can have a last
> > > say if it goes on the ballots or not.
> >
> > Correct again. Nominations used as weapons in a flame war are among
> > those unlikely to appear on the ballot.
> >
> >
> > PJR :-)
> >
> rocky nominating Kali for being a coward had nothing to do with any
> flamewar. I like you Peter, but you all show what a bunch of hypocrites
> you are in AUK, when you give people kook awards for certain behaviour
> and then ignore when one of your own do exactly the same thing over and
> over again. I know Kali claims that it's different when she does it, but
> I've yet to see any explanation to why and how etc. Maybe you would like
> to enlighten me on that issue.
<chirp>
>
> --
> knoxy
> mhm34x10
> smeeter #6
> #6 on mimus wanted poster list
>
> "The Internet is a gateway to get on the net."
> Bob Dole
>
> "Do it anyway. You are being a kook so you are not allowed to make
> decisions.
>
> You'll feel better that way."
>
> Necco calling me a kook in message id Yuxcf.12584$cg.1...@news02.roc.ny
rocky
<rbuc...@neubauten.org> wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:25:31 GMT, Peter J Ross <p...@kookbusters.org>
>posted something accessible as
>news:slrndotju...@nntp.petitmorte.net in alt.usenet.kooks,
>selections of which I respond to below:
>
>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:49:28 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>> <rbuc...@neubauten.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:28:35 GMT, Peter J Ross <p...@kookbusters.org>
>>> posted something accessible as
>>> news:slrndotgj...@nntp.petitmorte.net in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>> selections of which I respond to below:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:42 -0500, rocky
>>>> <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>
>>>>> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
>>>>> snipping auk
>>>>
>>>> No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
>>>> entertainment.
>>>
>>> Careful, PJR! Ari might claim a spank on you, and then where will
>>> you be?
>>
>> I expect I'll be in alt.flame, enjoying the annual free floorshow
>> known as the alt.flame awards.
>
>I'd crash the party, but I have a gag reflex.
that's easily solved. when going to partys stop giving everyone a
blowjob. you might even earn your self respect back, you cheap slut.
rocky
wrote:
>From : Grand Moff Robert Buchanan <rbuc...@neubauten.org>
>Message-ID : <ltAjf.950$kV7...@news02.roc.ny>
>
>
>
>>
>>I have a gag reflex
>
>
>It just proves to grunt, all you need ia single digit IQ
after giving blowjobs at partys his iq remains as one digit while he's
has a dick in his mouth belonging to some poor bastard who didn't get
away from him fast enough.
rocky
wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:28:35 GMT, Peter J Ross <p...@kookbusters.org>
>transparently proposed:
>
>>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:42 -0500, rocky
>><ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
>>> snipping auk
>>
>>No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
>>entertainment.
>>
>>
>>PJR :-)
>
>Besides which, alt.lame has their own awards and are quite welcome to
somone should ng alt.lame as any of the 'leet kids who refer to
alt.flame as alt.lame will look like idiots, if they don't already, as
they will be talking about another ng entierly.
>nominate AUK denizens for whatever award the snuhtards wish.
what is your problem with kali being nominated for her cowardice by
snipping alt.flame from the x-post line?
rocky
>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:42 -0500, rocky
><ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
>> snipping auk
>
>No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
>entertainment.
' i'm a k00k and i snip auk to annoy the aukers which realy makes them
irate and amuzes me?'
where is the difference between kali and a k00k snipping an ng?, the
only real difference is the nyms are different?
>PJR :-)
rocky
<rbuc...@neubauten.org> wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:38:17 GMT, rocky <ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org>
>posted something accessible as
>news:rr2to1di2kk3f8f1h...@4ax.com in alt.usenet.kooks,
>selections of which I respond to below:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:16 -0000, knoxy <kn...@post.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <be9no1l1adlgi2jl6...@4ax.com>,
>>>ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org says...
>>>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:36:21 +0000, "Everclear"
>>>> <ever...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Kali said the following:
>>>> >
>>>> >> In article <kutko11gk98g1v188...@4ax.com>, posted
>>>> >> Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:25:47 -0500, rocky
>>>> >> ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org says...
>>>> >>
no doubt if requested to do so you would have no problems proving this
claim of yours?
>> he has come to the poor damsles defence.
>
>Actually, I've been trying to call you to the carpet for your endless semi-
>literate obsessing over Kali. The trouble is, you keep running away.
oh dear, does my dyslexia offend your poor american, as if its real
english, english spelling sensibilites, its not like you fuckheads
spell correctly yourselves. where does your hypocrasy end?
>> it would seem kali isn't big enough to look after herself.
>> fucking coward.
>
>You're one to talk, spankard.
which k00k whacked you so hard around the head he left you a brain
damaged moron who realy doesn't know shit about shit and likes to brag
about it openly? s/he deserves an award for usenet good samaritanship.
rocky
thats' easy. he has double monitor vision because he's been smacked
around the head so hard and often.
rocky
>In article <301120051911465065%art_...@127.0.0.1>, posted Wed,
>30 Nov 2005 19:11:46 -0700, Art Deco art_...@127.0.0.1 says...
>
>>Kali <Ka...@lart.meow> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <rr2to1di2kk3f8f1h...@4ax.com>, posted
>>>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:38:17 -0500, rocky
>>>>Moff Robert Buchanan, is his name. he has come to the poor damsles
>>>>defence. it would seem kali isn't big enough to look after herself.
>>>>fucking coward.
>>>
>>>Hey, that lits has pissed off more idiots than Carter's have
>>>pills. I would nominate the Hotties Lits for the HL&S Award if
>>>it weren't my own trolliscious creation.
>>>
>>>So, ignoramus, who is Brad Jesness, and what is the history and
>>>meaning of the hotties list? I'd hesitate to offer a clue so
>>>soon, but in your case it's a non-issue.
>>>
>>>Ahem:
>>>
>>>I only see 7 posts about me in the past hour. Stop slacking. :(
>>>
>>>** --> [alt.flame] <-- **
>>
>>Who is this new lamer, my liege?
>
>I don't know who he is, but he appears to be auditioning for the
>part of Kali's holiday '05 fan bjoi.
if i am does that mean i get straight on to your hottie list as that's
where the 'leet fan bjois hang out?
>[alt.flame] <-- would have been snecked if it had been included
i bet you added it then removed it for your own k00ky amuzement.
>Kali
Aratzio
<ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> got double secret probation because:
I said "nominate AUK denizens". Note the non-specificity. So, if in
your world that translates to "problem with kali being nominated" then
I would get to suing the educational system that failed you so
miserably.
rocky
wrote:
>Nice gay lame, alt.lamer.
hey, he's the one with the gag reflex and posted about it, i just
suggested how he could stop the problem.
>[alt.(f)lame snecked]
my, what a brave man you are, is that your balls your holding or
prosphetic ones?
rocky
wrote:
>On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:45:41 -0500, rocky
><ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> got double secret probation because:
>
>>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:05:07 GMT, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:28:35 GMT, Peter J Ross <p...@kookbusters.org>
>>>transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:42 -0500, rocky
>>>><ro...@fuckoffspammer.meow.org> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>
>>>>> snipping alt.flame from the x-post line is the same as a k00k
>>>>> snipping auk
>>>>
>>>>No it isn't. It annoys alt.flame, and is therefore a source of
>>>>entertainment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>PJR :-)
>>>
>>>Besides which, alt.lame has their own awards and are quite welcome to
>>
>>somone should ng alt.lame as any of the 'leet kids who refer to
>>alt.flame as alt.lame will look like idiots, if they don't already, as
>>they will be talking about another ng entierly.
>>
>>>nominate AUK denizens for whatever award the snuhtards wish.
>>
>>what is your problem with kali being nominated for her cowardice by
>>snipping alt.flame from the x-post line?
>
>I said "nominate AUK denizens". Note the non-specificity. So, if in
>your world that translates to "problem with kali being nominated" then
in my world i see things howether the drugs, be them prescribed or
self poscribed, i'm taking want me to see it. throw in my dyslexia and
things realy start to become fun.
does that make me a k00k and can i have an auk award. tia.
>I would get to suing the educational system that failed you so
>miserably.
you have no idea how badly i was let down by those cunts, i didn't
find out i was dyslexic untill well after i'd left collegel.
Aratzio
Wait until you get near 50...FUCK ME, 3 months to go...
>
>does that make me a k00k and can i have an auk award. tia.
Keep asking the wrong guy, ask PJR. DAEV has been beggin for a couple
months and it ain't doin him any good. Although he might have gobbled
an AF nomination.
>
>>I would get to suing the educational system that failed you so
>>miserably.
>
>you have no idea how badly i was let down by those cunts, i didn't
>find out i was dyslexic untill well after i'd left collegel.
As did my mildly dyslexic brother, but they just thought he was a
*poor reader* (late 50's/early 60's).
Aratzio
secret probation because:
>Aratzio wrote:
>
>> Wait until you get near 50...FUCK ME, 3 months to go...
>
>What is this, AARP find-a-date? Fuck yourself, geezer.
<looks around>
*This* is alt.config?