Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

SUCK artwork on the web!!!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

DNALJM

unread,
Jun 1, 2003, 10:50:56 PM6/1/03
to
I navigated around looking for some good artwork on the web (other
than mine, of course). The way to go obviously was not to select someone at
random, as the time would be better spent putting two pencils up my nose and
slamming my head on the desk. I'm no pillar of the 21 century art community or
anything, and long after I'm a maggot banquet I'm sure I will be forgotten as
soon as my corpse cools off.

But this site, like 90% of art on the web, had the effect of making me
feel embarrassed for its creator. First off, she uses figures and landscapes
but has invested no time whatsoever in learning how to draw a fucken hand or
the finer points of facial features. It is hard to react emotionally to the
work when you are distracted by the baaad craftsmanship.

When you visit a site on any other topic, it may suck. The web is a
real crapshoot. But the worst by far out there are sites dealing with artwork.
This is probably due to the fact that art is taught to foster the idea that
everything a student makes is precious and valid. If this woman was in my
class and pulled out her overly sentimental pabulum I would tell her I wouldn't
even wipe my whisker biscuit after taking a piss with it.

As if her compositionally weak crap (it deals with 9/11 and the
war in Iraq) were not enough, you get her emotionally drooly and bad poetry
too. It's like she's using 9/11 as a crutch to make her piss poor artwork have
more weight. Fucken disgusting. I can just hear her as the towers fell, "I
have a responsibility as an _artist_ to respond to this tragedy on canvas."
*puke*

You may think I'm a 1st class bitch for loosening my bowls on this
inbred. Or that there are more people deserving of being flamed. But hey, if
you're going to put it out there, that's the risk you take. Someone who took
the time out to learn to fucken draw and learn the Latin names of every tendon
and bone, someone who took a little FUCKEN PRIDE may come along and call your
bluff.

The first thing you notice is a link pushing a book and a proud
statement claiming the two-dimensional piece of crap that you are greeted with
is the cover for it. But if your eyes don't bleed right out of your skull
after looking at this and you follow the link, you will see the dumb bitch has
AUTHORED THE BOOK HERSELF. After reading the poetry on the site, I think a
safer bet would be to set 15 dollars on fire and shoving the ashes up your ass.


Link to the menagerie of shit: http://www.maryjomagar.com/

Jane

Humble.Life

unread,
Jun 1, 2003, 11:34:24 PM6/1/03
to
snip

>
> Link to the menagerie of shit: http://www.maryjomagar.com/

Its better than I can manage.


X-flaagg-X

unread,
Jun 1, 2003, 11:43:47 PM6/1/03
to
In article <20030601225056...@mb-m19.aol.com>, DNALJM
<dna...@aol.com> writes...

> I'm no pillar of the 21 century art community or
>anything, and long after I'm a maggot banquet I'm sure I will be forgotten as
>soon as my corpse cools off.

Sooner, even.

--
Aaron M. Henne - mhm9x2 - "Democracy, Whiskey, Sexy!"

HEY, KIRK! Get Your FREE Fuckhead Cascade
screen saver for Windows at:
http://home.attbi.com/~flaagg

DNALJM

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 8:43:59 AM6/2/03
to
>> I'm no pillar of the 21 century art community or
>>anything, and long after I'm a maggot banquet I'm sure I will be forgotten
>as
>>soon as my corpse cools off.
>
>Sooner, even.

Yeah, you miserable fucken tosser, what major museum are you in? At least my
art is on a book I didn't have to WRITE MYSELF and lie about it on my own page.
Nope, you're part of the dancing compost heap yourself, buddy.

Jane

Just Plain Insane

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 11:20:48 AM6/2/03
to
On 02 Jun 2003 12:43:59 GMT I replied to dna...@aol.com (DNALJM) on a
piece of toilet paper while scribbling their name and phone number on
the bathroom wall in alt.flame

Where's your artwork again? I'd like to compare them being an artist
myself. Its pretty arrogant of someone to blast another artist without
showing their own work to be criticized.

DNALJM

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 12:38:24 PM6/2/03
to
>Where's your artwork again? I'd like to compare them being an artist
>myself. Its pretty arrogant of someone to blast another artist without
>showing their own work to be criticized.


Actually, I don't agree. Nobody asks to see John Updike's work when he
writes a critical article for the New Yorker. He went to art school, I'm not
sure if he makes artwork still, but anyway, being good at something certainly
helps in writing a criticism but doesn't necessarily mean you will write a bad
one if you're not.
Or let's say you go to the dentist and pay 300 dollars for a filling and
three weeks later it's a rotting mass of pus and bone in your head. You don't
really need a top of the line dentist to tell you that he fucked up, do you?
It is easier to say something sucks than to top it or do it. I think
it's even easier to make a helpful or accurate assesment of someone's skills
than to master them yourself. Some of the best art critics don't even make
artwork.
I thought it would be kinder to come here and take out my
pre-menstrating bitch fest than to write to her personally, don't you? I doubt
anyone as "sensitive" and "caring" as she would be a regular to a flame group.

But ANYWAY, if you think that it would be less cowardly of me to throw
up my own work then I'll oblige you. I threw up these images real quick on my
ISP's drag and drop editor, so I can't say it's an award winning website, but
you get the idea:

http://www.members.aol.com/balthus22/index.html

Jane

X-flaagg-X

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 12:58:13 PM6/2/03
to
In article <20030602123824...@mb-m25.aol.com>, DNALJM
<dna...@aol.com> writes...

>>Where's your artwork again? I'd like to compare them being an artist
>>myself. Its pretty arrogant of someone to blast another artist without
>>showing their own work to be criticized.
>
>
> Actually, I don't agree. Nobody asks to see John Updike's work when he
>writes a critical article for the New Yorker.

You're not John Updike.

X-flaagg-X

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 1:07:45 PM6/2/03
to
In article <20030602084359...@mb-m25.aol.com>, DNALJM
<dna...@aol.com> writes...

>>> I'm no pillar of the 21 century art community or
>>>anything, and long after I'm a maggot banquet I'm sure I will be forgotten
>>as
>>>soon as my corpse cools off.
>>
>>Sooner, even.
>
> Yeah, you miserable fucken tosser, what major museum are you in?

I'm up at the the MoMA, last I heard. That's major.

DNALJM

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 4:46:08 PM6/2/03
to
>I'm up at the the MoMA, last I heard. That's major.
>

Evidence?

Jane

X-flaagg-X

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 5:00:06 PM6/2/03
to
In article <20030602164608...@mb-m26.aol.com>, DNALJM
<dna...@aol.com> writes...

>>I'm up at the the MoMA, last I heard. That's major.
>>
>
> Evidence?

Make your way to New York and see for -yourself-. I'm an artist, not a
fucking tour guide.

--
Aaron M. Henne - mhm9x2 -

HEY, KIRK! Get Your FREE Fuckhead Cascade

DNALJM

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 8:26:01 PM6/2/03
to
>Make your way to New York and see for -yourself-. I'm an artist, not a
>fucking tour guide.

Searching their lists of collections produces no results. Lying about being
in that amalgam of degenerate bullshit is like bragging that you caught crabs
in a whorehouse toilet anyway.

Jane

Just Plain Insane

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 8:39:11 PM6/2/03
to
On 02 Jun 2003 16:38:24 GMT I replied to dna...@aol.com (DNALJM) on a

piece of toilet paper while scribbling their name and phone number on
the bathroom wall in alt.flame

>>Where's your artwork again? I'd like to compare them being an artist


>>myself. Its pretty arrogant of someone to blast another artist without
>>showing their own work to be criticized.
>
>
> Actually, I don't agree. Nobody asks to see John Updike's work when he
>writes a critical article for the New Yorker. He went to art school, I'm not
>sure if he makes artwork still, but anyway, being good at something certainly
>helps in writing a criticism but doesn't necessarily mean you will write a bad
>one if you're not.

Wanna bet? Updike has some good work, but the majority of his work is
boring and droll.

<snip dentist bullshit>

> I thought it would be kinder to come here and take out my
>pre-menstrating bitch fest than to write to her personally, don't you? I doubt
>anyone as "sensitive" and "caring" as she would be a regular to a flame group.

TRANSLATION: I have PMS and figured I'd troll someone and smear
someone througout usenet for no reason other to be a royal bitch and a
k00k.


> But ANYWAY, if you think that it would be less cowardly of me to throw
>up my own work then I'll oblige you. I threw up these images real quick on my
>ISP's drag and drop editor, so I can't say it's an award winning website, but
>you get the idea:
>
>http://www.members.aol.com/balthus22/index.html
>

You were commenting on someone else's work, that their facial features
suck?? Well, 99% of your artwork.....they look like they were cross
bred with alien Grays. Neck too elongated, face to wide oir too
skinny, mouth looks like its stretched across their faces.

Oh, if you want to see some of my artwork, just ask. I'll put it on
some webspace for you to look at. I'd direct you to my site, but I
didn't have enough extra to pay for the domain name this year.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you think you know me, you don't.
........Satirically yours
**
Scott Dentice aka y6g11 <y6...@aol.com> is a confessed spammer, liar, and thief.
**
"Look asshole, just go away already. There is no need for you to
reply. When you do, it makes you look like a fool. You can't stand
that can you ronnie?" G.Morgan to Ron/Scott Thomas in alt.computer.security
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Just Plain Insane

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 8:40:28 PM6/2/03
to
On 03 Jun 2003 00:26:01 GMT I replied to dna...@aol.com (DNALJM) on a

piece of toilet paper while scribbling their name and phone number on
the bathroom wall in alt.flame

>>Make your way to New York and see for -yourself-. I'm an artist, not a

Talking from experience?

X-flaagg-X

unread,
Jun 2, 2003, 11:23:34 PM6/2/03
to
In article <20030602202601...@mb-m26.aol.com>, DNALJM
<dna...@aol.com> writes...

>>Make your way to New York and see for -yourself-. I'm an artist, not a
>>fucking tour guide.
>
> Searching their lists of collections produces no results.

You must have done something wrong, then. I'm hardly surprised - I've
seen your simplistic work and oddly-shaped head, remember.

>Lying about being
>in that amalgam of degenerate bullshit is like bragging that you caught crabs
>in a whorehouse toilet anyway.

Jealousy is such a waste of artistic energy, Jane. Are you sure you
have any to spare?

Avoid normal situations.

unread,
Jun 4, 2003, 5:33:47 AM6/4/03
to
DNALJM <dna...@aol.com> wrote:

[..]



> Link to the menagerie of shit: http://www.maryjomagar.com/

Oh, dear. I see your point.

"Fear No Evil" is my !favorite. Oh Christ, that badly done nose and eyes.
It looks like a junior high school doodle done by somebody who always sits
in the back in Religion and Philosophy class.

--
alt.flame Special Forces
"I'm sorry it happened, it was just a piece of hot-headed foolishness."
-- Dion O'Bannion, on a 1920s assassination

DNALJM

unread,
Jun 5, 2003, 1:22:02 PM6/5/03
to
>Jealousy is such a waste of artistic energy, Jane. Are you sure you
>have any to spare?
>

Why would I be jealous? I can support myself with my art and I studied on
a full scholarship so I'm not even saddled with student loans. I'm pretty
happy with my art and my life.

Jane

DNALJM

unread,
Jun 5, 2003, 1:41:06 PM6/5/03
to
>Wanna bet? Updike has some good work, but the majority of his work is
>boring and droll.

I've always enjoyed his novels, and his art criticims seem well thought out
and well respected. You really didn't give me anything to respond to in terms
of concrete examples, though.

>TRANSLATION: I have PMS

To re-eludicate WHAT I JUST POSTED. So glad you're on the case. /sarc

and figured I'd troll someone and smear
>someone througout usenet for no reason other to be a royal bitch and a
>k00k.
>

Yup, bitch, that's me. But I did have reasons: I thought her artwork
sucked. She put it up there, my browser stumbled on it, and I voiced my
opinion. I thought it was syrupy, without real content, and I thought the
poetry was melodramatic fluff. Got a problem with it? Piss off.


>Well, 99% of your artwork.....they look like they were cross

>bred with alien Grays. Neck too elongated, face to wide oir* too
>skinny, mouth looks like its* stretched across their faces.

OK, first off: it's: It is contraction. That's what you want to use to
make yourself sound somewhat educated. I see you've invested about as much
time editing your text as that dumb bitch I flamed invested in learning how to
draw.
Secondly: I don't really care about your art. I feel pretty good about
my skills as a draftsmen and have been lauded as such by scientific
illustrators and figurative artists alike.
Even if I not at the top of the art heap I don't give a fuck. Know
why? Because I don't have to use things like the World Trade Center falling to
give credibility to my art. Because I took the time out to learn about
chemistry and anatomy because I care about my craft. Because if I opt to make
an alteration in my figures like a long neck it's not done out of ignorance,
but out of preference.

Jane

DNALJM

unread,
Jun 5, 2003, 1:43:01 PM6/5/03
to
>> Searching their lists of collections produces no results. Lying about
>being
>>in that amalgam of degenerate bullshit is like bragging that you caught
>crabs
>>in a whorehouse toilet anyway.
>
>Talking from experience?
>

I stopped there to use the phone book but saw them dripping off your
girlfriend, so I turned tail and ran.

Jane

X-flaagg-X

unread,
Jun 6, 2003, 4:13:56 AM6/6/03
to
In article <20030605132202...@mb-m11.aol.com>, DNALJM
<dna...@aol.com> writes...

Crap.

You win.

Wurk

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 8:39:55 PM6/14/03
to

"X-flaagg-X" <flaagg_REMOVE_TO_MAIL@REMOVE_TO_MAIL_attbi.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1949ed2cd...@netnews.attbi.com...

> In article <20030605132202...@mb-m11.aol.com>, DNALJM
> <dna...@aol.com> writes...
>
> >>Jealousy is such a waste of artistic energy, Jane. Are you sure you
> >>have any to spare?
> >>
> >
> > Why would I be jealous? I can support myself with my art and I studied
on
> >a full scholarship so I'm not even saddled with student loans. I'm pretty
> >happy with my art and my life.
>
> Crap.
>
> You win.

Win crap?

Hahaha

J. Wurk Xemblinosky III

X-Wurk-X

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 8:42:31 PM6/14/03
to

"X-flaagg-X" <flaagg_REMOVE_TO_MAIL@REMOVE_TO_MAIL_attbi.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1945243c3...@netnews.attbi.com...

> In article <20030602084359...@mb-m25.aol.com>, DNALJM
> <dna...@aol.com> writes...
>
> >>> I'm no pillar of the 21 century art community or
> >>>anything, and long after I'm a maggot banquet I'm sure I will be forgotten
> >>as
> >>>soon as my corpse cools off.
> >>
> >>Sooner, even.
> >
> > Yeah, you miserable fucken tosser, what major museum are you in?
>
> I'm up at the the MoMA, last I heard. That's major.

Who's MoMA?

Hahaha

Raoul Wurklinosky Experience

Anal polyp

unread,
Sep 5, 2003, 1:16:18 PM9/5/03
to
On Wed, 15 Jun 2033 11:53:29 -0400 mr knuckles <Ran...@beatings.org> wrote

Kerro? Is that you?

in Message id: <3237036.BeP46VatdP@zappity-zappity-zoo>:

[.]

0 new messages