Pinging My Most Recent SPANKARDS.
The Phantom Menace
Please respond, Henderdouche.
What's your 20, Spamtician?
Turdjeff, come in.
Hmf.
Hellooooo...
[sound of moaning wind]
Hm.
I win!
e-lan
--
"Do you think you have a corner on clueless posting?"
- Clueless usenet poster Jimmy Nicholson gets jealous in
<3A15A720...@akamail.com>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
myster...@my-deja.com
The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> Suzieflame, report in.
> Please respond, Henderdouche.
> What's your 20, Spamtician?
> Turdjeff, come in.
>
> Hmf.
>
> Hellooooo...
>
> [sound of moaning wind]
>
> Hm.
>
> I win!
>
Slurpy, the only thing YOU could ever win would be the king of
choadswallowing. Get back in your parent's basement, STAR WARS NO-LIFE
GEEK!
Jesus Slut Fucker
>
> Suzieflame, report in.
> Please respond, Henderdouche.
> What's your 20, Spamtician?
> Turdjeff, come in.
>
> Hmf.
>
> Hellooooo...
>
> [sound of moaning wind]
>
> Hm.
>
> I win!
>
Damn boy I really hate to burst your bubble, but the only thing you
can successfully spank around here is your monkey and even that is
suspect. Oh yeah, and as long as we are on the subject, did you
every get that plastic light saber out of your ass or did they have
to have it surgically removed?
-Jesus
John Kimball
<the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>Suzieflame, report in.
Actually, it would appear that Kevin Filan gets the credit for
Suzieflame.
--
"...even as we speak I am working on a vacuum cleaner with a dick
sucking attachment. It should put the fun back into cleaning the
carpet..."
Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@home.com> comes to terms with his loneliness
after his stint in federal prison in Message-ID: <3A016FD9...@home.com>
Read all about convicted felon Jesus Slut Fucker
AKA Paris "Eugene" Paskell's real life fuckups at:
http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt35 and
http://www.philosophy.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt39
Parole Officer:
Chris Hudson
d6@office@doc.state.ok.us
(405)681-4663
The Phantom Menace
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:06:39 GMT, The Phantom Menace
> <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >Suzieflame, report in.
>
> Actually, it would appear that Kevin Filan gets the credit for
> Suzieflame.
Kevin who? *I* was the one who pointed out how she's living in some
mutant-insect-ridden flat on the "wages" of an octagenarian Britrocker
from the fifties named - get this - ALVIN STARDUST "in return" for
bearing his child (given all those Nor'easters of cocaine, birth really
can be a miracle).
Spank-spank-eree spank-spank-eree spank-spank a-roo...
e-lectricboogiewoogiewoogie
--
"Ah yes, Noobian! We gotta lotsa dat! Lemme take-a ya outta
back, we'll find what you need, heh heh heh."
- Watto
Kevin Filan
The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> There Be No Shelter Here for John Kimball:
> > On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:06:39 GMT, The Phantom Menace
> > <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Suzieflame, report in.
> >
> > Actually, it would appear that Kevin Filan gets the credit for
> > Suzieflame.
>
> Kevin who? *I* was the one who pointed out how she's living in some
> mutant-insect-ridden flat on the "wages" of an octagenarian Britrocker
> from the fifties named - get this - ALVIN STARDUST "in return" for
> bearing his child (given all those Nor'easters of cocaine, birth
really
> can be a miracle).
I'd be interested in seeing the evidence for that one. Based
on what I saw from Suzie's posts, it would appear that she is
gainfully employed in some capacity which permits her Internet
access at work. (I suppose she could be a cleaning lady who
takes advantage of the fact that some folks leave their computers
on when they leave their job...).
If I'm wrong, and you're right, all I could say on the subject
would be
BWAAHAHAHAHAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
Peace
Kevin Filan
The Phantom Menace
> In article <8vebng$qq1$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > There Be No Shelter Here for John Kimball:
> > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:06:39 GMT, The Phantom Menace
> > > <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Suzieflame, report in.
> > >
> > > Actually, it would appear that Kevin Filan gets the credit for
> > > Suzieflame.
> >
> > Kevin who? *I* was the one who pointed out how she's living in some
> > mutant-insect-ridden flat on the "wages" of an octagenarian
Britrocker
> > from the fifties named - get this - ALVIN STARDUST "in return" for
> > bearing his child (given all those Nor'easters of cocaine, birth
> really
> > can be a miracle).
>
> I'd be interested in seeing the evidence for that one.
> Based
> on what I saw from Suzie's posts, it would appear that she is
> gainfully employed in some capacity which permits her Internet
> access at work.
Ohhhh REEE-HEH-HEH-HEALLY... I believe she told ME she's retired:
From <8tuf2p$7h6$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
"No. I completed them all by the age of 25 after working with Alvin
Stardust. I now live a life of calm repose and financial security, from
whence I venture forth now and again to pass wisdom on to those less
fortunate than I."
Yet another tree-dwelling gibbon from the UK pretending that their
posting to alt.flame is done only to take a break from counting their
king-sized stacks of cash. Pfeh, I say.
Maybe she didn't blat his child out of her slimy womb, but she's got
SOMETHING on ALVIN STARDUST.
And THE PHANTOM MENACE will find out once and for all.
> (I suppose she could be a cleaning lady who
> takes advantage of the fact that some folks leave their computers
> on when they leave their job...).
Just the cunts in MARKETING who're afraid it won't start up again.
> If I'm wrong, and you're right, all I could say on the subject
> would be
>
> BWAAHAHAHAHAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
How de rigeur.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
See? Much better!
e-galitarian
--
"Do you think you have a corner on clueless posting?"
- Clueless usenet poster Jimmy Nicholson gets jealous in
<3A15A720...@akamail.com>
John Kimball
<the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>There Be No Shelter Here for John Kimball:
>>
>> Actually, it would appear that Kevin Filan gets the credit for
>> Suzieflame.
>
>Kevin who? *I* was the one who pointed out how she's living in some
>mutant-insect-ridden flat on the "wages" of an octagenarian Britrocker
>from the fifties named - get this - ALVIN STARDUST "in return" for
>bearing his child (given all those Nor'easters of cocaine, birth really
>can be a miracle).
Witness:
+++++++++++++++++BEGIN REPOST+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Path:
rQdQ!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!128.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.hackers.malicious,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: More Whining About "Stalkers"
From: raksh...@my-deja.com (Kevin Filan)
Organization: Harwer's Hangout and House o' Flames
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
Keywords: Go away.
References: <8uv7i0$6jg$2...@moriarty.databasix.com>
<8v2ktt$sqo$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
<FB9EA6E1809CBE19.FC9EDC18...@lp.airnews.net>
<8v3ad5$cs7$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
<a6la1tsihsb7ulvvk...@scobie.mil>
<8v45s5$dj0$3...@fluffy.databasix.com>
<MBlR5.2757$xd3.2...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
<kdic1t4u5orkf0di8...@scobie.mil>
<8v5jtp$8ik$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
<3pnc1t80kfpsqhkkd...@scobie.mil>
<8v5pds$btp$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
<2ubd1t459j49fhuj7...@scobie.mil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
Lines: 110
Message-ID: <_DNR5.7359$xd3.5...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:07:54 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.244.100.223
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 974628474 209.244.100.223
(Sun, 19 Nov 2000 02:07:54 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 02:07:54 PST
Xref: rQdQ alt.hackers.malicious:214658 alt.usenet.kooks:338817
In article <2ubd1t459j49fhuj7...@scobie.mil>,
ju...@grotbag.SPAMBLOCKfsnet.co.uk
says...
>
>Seriously, if you've got a beef with Suzie and her actions, take it up
>with her. You'll end up with a second asshole like your girlfriend, but
>that's not really my problem, is it?
Actually, I took my beef up with Suzie's workplace (she posted
that threat from Siemens... the people I sent email to seemed
to agree that this constituted harassment and an unacceptable
use of company resources, though I have no idea what they did
about it, if anything).
Posting a threat to contact someone's workplace FROM your
workplace is not one of the brighter moves in Usenet history.
+++++++++++++++++++++++END REPOST++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Spank-spank-eree spank-spank-eree spank-spank a-roo...
Perhaps, but I believe the above post indicates why.
>e-lectricboogiewoogiewoogie
myster...@my-deja.com
> > <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Suzieflame, report in.
> >
> > Actually, it would appear that Kevin Filan gets the credit for
> > Suzieflame.
>
> Kevin who? *I* was the one who pointed out how she's living in some
> mutant-insect-ridden flat on the "wages" of an octagenarian Britrocker
> from the fifties named - get this - ALVIN STARDUST "in return" for
> bearing his child (given all those Nor'easters of cocaine, birth
really
> can be a miracle).
>
>
> e-lectricboogiewoogiewoogie
It's just another child for you to MOLEST, esager, CHILD RAPER.
The Phantom Menace
> <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >There Be No Shelter Here for John Kimball:
> >>
> >> Suzieflame.
> >
> >Kevin who? *I* was the one who pointed out how she's living in some
> >mutant-insect-ridden flat on the "wages" of an octagenarian
Britrocker
> >from the fifties named - get this - ALVIN STARDUST "in return" for
> >bearing his child (given all those Nor'easters of cocaine, birth
really
> >can be a miracle).
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++BEGIN REPOST+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Path:
> rQdQ!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!128.230.129.106!
news.maxwell.syr.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!
news-out.usenetserver.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!
newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!
Well I'll be a slack-jawed sonofabitch.
Too bad about this RL trend in the "flame" world nowadays. Poor Suze.
The fuckin LIAR.
e-stuffedwithturkeygiblets
--
"Do you think you have a corner on clueless posting?"
- Clueless usenet poster Jimmy Nicholson gets jealous in
<3A15A720...@akamail.com>
James Kirk
>
>In alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk The Phantom Menace
><the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> *plonk*
*BLAM*
>--
>The Stainless "it's good to be back" Steel Moviegoer
>"But it's not lust for womanflesh or even the English crown that turns Richard
>-- Al Pacino -- on. It's the heady challenge of entering inert, undefined
>space and making yourself the fulcrum of emotion, event, action. "
> -- Kathleen Murphy
Avoid normal situations.
[..]
*plonk*
Hogarth
<by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>In alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> *plonk*
So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is required.
_________
Hogarth
_________
"I appease my sexually desires with masterbation. Most people think of
masterbation as bad but in my opinion it is a lot better than having
sex"
Diaper Boy (mou...@hscis.net, formerly mou...@wwics.com) confesses
all in: http://rainforest.parentsplace.com/dialog/get/teens/29/4.html
The Phantom Menace
> In alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk The Phantom Menace
<the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> *plonk*
*SPANK*
e-go
--
FICKLENESS, n. The iterated satiety of an enterprising affection.
- The Devil's Dictionary
Nostrildamus
<by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>In alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> *plonk*
Troll.
--
Nostrildamus, Methuselah Of Usenet
~~~ Dean, Academy of Poetic Prognostication, Bungmunch University ~~~~
"SEMPER MEOVAMVS AD INFINITVM ET INFINITVM"
~~~~~~~~ CASHP #31-97 ~~~~~~~ Bellower #21 ~~~~~~ mhm 4x8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avoid normal situations.
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
> <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
[..]
> Troll.
No.
--
The Stainless Steel Moviegoer
Big Daddy Zeus
wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
><by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>
>>In alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>
>> [..]
>>
>> *plonk*
>
>So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is required.
>
I spanked him last time I was here.
--
Big Daddy Zeus™
Hell Flame Wars ©
Menjy
>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> Troll.
>
> No.
Fuckhead?
--
Flamer to the Gentry -- Prof. IACW -- mhm 20x8 -- "ludus non nisi sanguineus"
http://iacw.usenet-performance-art.org/ (updated 7th June '00)
The Phantom Menace
It wasn't you, Hell Flame Wars guy. T'was William Shakespeare whom
didst yon spanking.
e-viscerate
--
SAINT, n. A dead sinner revised and edited.
- The Devil's Dictionary
Menjy
> T'was William Shakespeare whom didst yon spanking.
*Blam*
>e-literate
Avoid normal situations.
> Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>>> "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
[..]
>>> Troll.
>>
>> No.
> Fuckhead?
Reportedly.
--
The Stainless "You have to love the irony. Last time I came back under a
new account I had a fake name, and it took Legion no time at all to recognize
me. Years later, I come back under my own name, and Nostradamus thinks I'm a
troll." Steel Moviegoer
scott campbell
> > Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> >>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> >>> "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >>> Troll.
> >>
> >> No.
>
> > Fuckhead?
>
> Reportedly.
Seconded.
--
Scott Campbell - mhm 24x12
The Phantom Menace
> The Phantom Menace wrote:
>
> > T'was William Shakespeare whom didst yon spanking.
>
> *Blam*
>
> >e-literate
[bows]
Yon varlet apeareth to mine visonage to be-eth a rogue BETABASIX sock;
verily to be SPNAKED senseless by the mighty TJANNER. Hide thine eyes
and weep not, for thy blah blah blah.
Fuck Shakespeare.
[bows again]
[and once more, for the yea verily of it]
e-gret
--
"General," said the commander of the delinquent brigade, "I am
persuaded that any further display of valor by my troops will
bring them into collision with the enemy."
- The Devil's Dictionary
Avoid normal situations.
> In article <9034ct$ph8$1...@og1.olagrande.net>,
>> > Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>> >>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> >>> "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
[..]
>> >>> Troll.
>> >>
>> >> No.
>>
>> > Fuckhead?
>>
>> Reportedly.
> Seconded.
Fuckhead.
Adrian Smith
> > In article <9034ct$ph8$1...@og1.olagrande.net>,
> >> > Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> >> >>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> >> >>> "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >> >>> Troll.
> >> >>
> >> >> No.
> >>
> >> > Fuckhead?
> >>
> >> Reportedly.
>
> > Seconded.
>
> Fuckhead.
Fourthed, then.
--
Adrian Smith
the_mighty_balloo
> Hogarth <hog...@eircom.net> wrote:
>> Avoid <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>>> The Phantom Presence wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>
>>> *plonk*
>>
>> So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is required.
>
> I spanked him last time I was here.
Stain spanked Texas Tom.
He's also an authority on H.L. Mencken.
--
coochie coo
Benjamin D. Capoeman mhm15x1
c@poeman{at}homedotcom
the_mighty_balloo
> scott campbell wrote:
> [..]
>
>>> >>> Troll.
>>> >>
>>> >> No.
>>>
>>> > Fuckhead?
>>>
>>> Reportedly.
>
>> Seconded.
>
> Fuckhead.
Unanimous.
Hogarth
wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:41:08 +0000, Hogarth <hog...@eircom.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
>><by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>>
>>>In alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>> *plonk*
>>
>>So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is required.
>>
>I spanked him last time I was here.
You mean you called somebody a fag and they ignored you, Zuessie? How
exciting.
_________
Hogarth
_________
"You know I'm not ever going to stop Hogarth"
A rare flash of insight from Diaper Boy in
Message-ID: <399508ba...@news.hscis.net>
Avoid normal situations.
[..]
>>>> *plonk*
>>>
>>> So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is required.
>>
>> I spanked him last time I was here.
> Stain spanked Texas Tom.
We know.
> He's also an authority on H.L. Mencken.
You shouldn't, in the age of Deja News, pretend to have won a flamewar that
you lost by such a huge margin.
--
The Stainless "here we go again, mwhahahahahaha" Steel Moviegoer
Adrian Smith
> flamewar that you lost by such a huge margin.
Oh dear.
--
Adrian Smith
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
[..]
>> You shouldn't, in the age of Deja News, pretend to have won a
>> flamewar that you lost by such a huge margin.
> Oh dear.
Ditto.
--
The Stainless Steel Moviegoer
Adrian Smith
> > "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
> >> You shouldn't, in the age of Deja News, pretend to have won a
> >> flamewar that you lost by such a huge margin.
>
> > Oh dear.
>
> Ditto.
Well, *someone* certainly played bottom dog in the aforementioned
scenario. But the idea that it was anyone other than the party that
subsequently disappeared for several months, evidently to run victory
laps around his apartment, is a deeply novel one.
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>> > "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
[..]
>> >> You shouldn't, in the age of Deja News, pretend to have won a
>> >> flamewar that you lost by such a huge margin.
>>
>> > Oh dear.
>>
>> Ditto.
> Well, *someone* certainly played bottom dog in the aforementioned
> scenario. But the idea that it was anyone other than the party that
> subsequently disappeared for several months, evidently to run victory
> laps around his apartment, is a deeply novel one.
That won't wash, either. Had you been paying attention, you would have
noticed that going on sabbatical for a while, usually in the latter part
of the year, is standard practice for yours truly.
--
The Stainless "you suspiciously disappeared for a while too, let's not
forget" Steel Moviegoer
Adrian Smith
> > Well, *someone* certainly played bottom dog in the aforementioned
> > scenario. But the idea that it was anyone other than the party that
> > subsequently disappeared for several months, evidently to run
> > victory laps around his apartment, is a deeply novel one.
>
> That won't wash, either. Had you been paying attention, you would
> have noticed that going on sabbatical for a while, usually in the
> latter part of the year, is standard practice for yours truly.
Had I found the motivation to read a.f assiduously over a period of
years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say hello
to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
I wasn't *particularly* attributing your departure to an overwhelming
desire to immerse your butt in some glacier-fed mountain stream, to the
accompaniment of a glad 'Sssss...', a cloud of steam and a heartfelt
sigh of relief, though curious coincidences surround us on all sides.
But a way out of our little impasse suggests itself. You seemed to be
saying earlier that TT would be toast, academically speaking, were that
little slip of his you so slyly engineered to become common knowledge
among his peers. So why don't we go and look for them, on sci.lang or
some mailing list (balloo may have some suggestions, if you don't
consider his input too biased)? Of course, being in all probability
serious individuals with work to do, they may need a certain amount of
buttering up before they're willing to consider something as earth-
shattering as what happened on a.f over two years ago.
You'd better leave that bit to me. Not that I especially enjoy being
polite or anything, but under the circumstances getting them to even
read the exchange concerned is likely to require near-fellatial
obsequiousness, not to mention refraining from xposting back here.
Whaddya say?
The Phantom Menace
> In article <9068kl$qva$1...@og1.olagrande.net>,
<Kirk>
This is like watching those guys in Plymouth Plantation putting on a
pilgrims-imitation show.
</Kirk>
I swear da Gawd I can feel Stain's head hurting from here.
e-gret
--
ERUDITION, n. Dust shaken out of a book into an empty skull.
- The Devil's Dictionary
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
[..]
>> > Well, *someone* certainly played bottom dog in the aforementioned
>> > scenario. But the idea that it was anyone other than the party that
>> > subsequently disappeared for several months, evidently to run
>> > victory laps around his apartment, is a deeply novel one.
>>
>> That won't wash, either. Had you been paying attention, you would
>> have noticed that going on sabbatical for a while, usually in the
>> latter part of the year, is standard practice for yours truly.
> Had I found the motivation to read a.f assiduously over a period of
> years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
> lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say hello
> to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
In which case you're in no position to complain about your well-
documented fecklessness.
> I wasn't *particularly* attributing your departure to an overwhelming
> desire to immerse your butt in some glacier-fed mountain stream, to the
> accompaniment of a glad 'Sssss...', a cloud of steam and a heartfelt
> sigh of relief, though curious coincidences surround us on all sides.
Baaaaaaaackpedal, baaaaaaaaaaaackpedal.
> But a way out of our little impasse suggests itself. You seemed to be
> saying earlier that TT would be toast, academically speaking, were that
> little slip of his you so slyly engineered to become common knowledge
> among his peers. So why don't we go and look for them, on sci.lang or
> some mailing list (balloo may have some suggestions, if you don't
> consider his input too biased)? Of course, being in all probability
> serious individuals with work to do, they may need a certain amount of
> buttering up before they're willing to consider something as earth-
> shattering as what happened on a.f over two years ago.
> You'd better leave that bit to me. Not that I especially enjoy being
> polite or anything, but under the circumstances getting them to even
> read the exchange concerned is likely to require near-fellatial
> obsequiousness, not to mention refraining from xposting back here.
> Whaddya say?
Are you kidding? Like any alt.flame contributor, much less Howard Miller,
warrants that level of attention?
The sole reason that I kept the "Who Spanked Texas Tom?" thread going as
long as I did was to donate enough rope for you and Balloo to hang
yourselves (which you both, natch, did). I have better things to do.
In fact, I have better things to do than a thimblewit like you could
possibly imagine.
--
The Stainless Steel Moviegoer
the_mighty_balloo
> The sole reason that I kept the "Who Spanked Texas Tom?" thread going
> as long as I did was to donate enough rope for you and Balloo to hang
> yourselves (which you both, natch, did).
So every time you run from an argument for a few months is an
indicator to you that you've won that argument? That dovetails
nicely with your belief that people ridiculing you are paying
you some form of flattery.
Hey, did you read any Mencken while you were gone?
> I have better things to do.
Assumes facts not in evidence.
Menjy
[...]
>Had I found the motivation to read a.f assiduously over a period of
>years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
>lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say hello
>to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
Hello. I've been away for a bit, and I assume you have too. I noticed we both
reappeared in r.a.p. within minutes of each other this week. I briefly
wondered if anyone would conclude that we were, in fact, the same person, but
then realized that there's hardly anyone over there to conclude anything.
Oh, and Balloo isn't, as far as I can tell.
Adrian Smith
> > "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >> > Well, *someone* certainly played bottom dog in the aforementioned
> >> > scenario. But the idea that it was anyone other than the party
> >> > that subsequently disappeared for several months, evidently to
> >> > run victory laps around his apartment, is a deeply novel one.
> >>
> >> That won't wash, either. Had you been paying attention, you would
> >> have noticed that going on sabbatical for a while, usually in the
> >> latter part of the year, is standard practice for yours truly.
>
> > years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
> > lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say
> > hello to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
>
> documented fecklessness.
I ain't complaining about *mine*. You can go off on as many
conveniently-timed sabbaticals as you like.
> > I wasn't *particularly* attributing your departure to an
> > overwhelming desire to immerse your butt in some glacier-fed
> > mountain stream, to the accompaniment of a glad 'Sssss...',
> > a cloud of steam and a heartfelt sigh of relief, though
> > curious coincidences surround us on all sides.
>
> Baaaaaaaackpedal, baaaaaaaaaaaackpedal.
I merely referred to you as the party that subsequently disappeared for
several months, which you did. Whether cynical readers choose to infer
accusations of scampering into abject spankdom is up to them.
> > But a way out of our little impasse suggests itself. You seemed to
> > be saying earlier that TT would be toast, academically speaking,
> > were that little slip of his you so slyly engineered to become
> > common knowledge among his peers. So why don't we go and look for
> > them, on sci.lang or some mailing list (balloo may have some
> > suggestions, if you don't consider his input too biased)? Of
> > course, being in all probability serious individuals with work to
> > do, they may need a certain amount of
> > buttering up before they're willing to consider something as earth-
> > shattering as what happened on a.f over two years ago.
>
> > You'd better leave that bit to me. Not that I especially enjoy being
> > polite or anything, but under the circumstances getting them to even
> > read the exchange concerned is likely to require near-fellatial
> > obsequiousness, not to mention refraining from xposting back here.
>
> > Whaddya say?
>
> Are you kidding? Like any alt.flame contributor, much less Howard
> Miller, warrants that level of attention?
It's nothing to do with Howard per se - he's just a means to an end.
It's supporting your own contentions, and hence your own vestigial
credibility, that *might* warrant that level of attention.
Or not, of course.
> The sole reason that I kept the "Who Spanked Texas Tom?" thread
> going as long as I did was to donate enough rope for you and Balloo
> to hang yourselves (which you both, natch, did).
And very well hung we both find ourselves, I'm sure.
> I have better things to do. In fact, I have better things
> to do than a thimblewit like you could possibly imagine.
Just don't overinflate her - you'll void the warranty.
Nostrils
<by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
>> <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> Troll.
>
> No.
Sequestered?
--
Big Daddy Zues, Stock Picking Genius.
the_mighty_balloo
[...]
>> > I wasn't *particularly* attributing your departure to an
>> > overwhelming desire to immerse your butt in some glacier-fed
>> > mountain stream, to the accompaniment of a glad 'Sssss...',
>> > a cloud of steam and a heartfelt sigh of relief, though
>> > curious coincidences surround us on all sides.
>>
>> Baaaaaaaackpedal, baaaaaaaaaaaackpedal.
>
> I merely referred to you as the party that subsequently disappeared
> for several months, which you did. Whether cynical readers choose
> to infer accusations of scampering into abject spankdom is up to
> them.
Now Adrian, just because Stain left usenet for a prolonged period
of time claiming it to have been a planned absence doesn't mean
he was sp*
Oh. Yes. Funny how that cuts both ways, isn't it?
--
coochie coo
Benjamin D. Capoeman mhm15x1
c@poeman{at}homedotcom
maybe Stain was catching up on his Mencken
Adrian Smith
'Menjy' <me...@SPAMBLOCKdatabasix.com> wrote:
> >years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
> >lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say hello
> >to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
>
Nah. Just hanging around in a.p as usual. Where'd you go?
> I noticed
> we both reappeared in r.a.p. within minutes of each other this week.
> I briefly wondered if anyone would conclude that we were, in fact,
> the same person, but then realized that there's hardly anyone over
> there to conclude anything.
It needs Gilbert, doesn't it?
> Oh, and Balloo isn't, as far as I can tell.
Maybe something should be done about that.
the_mighty_balloo
>> Adrian Smith wrote:
>> >> Adrian Smith <adrian_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> >Had I found the motivation to read a.f assiduously over a period of
>> >years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
>> >lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say hello
>> >to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
>>
>> Hello. I've been away for a bit, and I assume you have too.
>
> Nah. Just hanging around in a.p as usual. Where'd you go?
>
>> I noticed
>> we both reappeared in r.a.p. within minutes of each other this week.
>> I briefly wondered if anyone would conclude that we were, in fact,
>> the same person, but then realized that there's hardly anyone over
>> there to conclude anything.
>
> It needs Gilbert, doesn't it?
van Buren Wilkes IV or Sullivan?
>> Oh, and Balloo isn't, as far as I can tell.
>
> Maybe something should be done about that.
Too late. Eleanor is almost five months old and is getting
her first tooth.
Mike MacLennan, Censor
> Oh, and Balloo isn't, as far as I can tell.
Balloo isn't. This phrase, in and of itself, says more than it would,
and that you would dare, in context.
> --
> Flamer to the Gentry -- Prof. IACW -- mhm 20x8 -- "ludus non nisi sanguineus"
> http://iacw.usenet-performance-art.org/ (updated 7th June '00)
--
"Mike Maclennan, who tries to
foist himself off as a flamer, is in realty a net-abusive
troll currently under investigation by a number of
agencies for interferring with public communications."
-Biil "Flaming me is treason" Palmer in
<8knmhj$894$1...@slb1.atl.mindspring.net>
Adrian Smith
b...@lloo.at.REMOVEpenis.dot.com (the_mighty_balloo) wrote:
> Adrian Smith escribió en artículo:
> > Menjy <me...@SPAMBLOCKdatabasix.com> wrote:
> >> I briefly wondered if anyone would conclude that we were, in fact,
> >> the same person, but then realized that there's hardly anyone over
> >> there to conclude anything.
> >
> > It needs Gilbert, doesn't it?
>
> van Buren Wilkes IV or Sullivan?
vbw4, naturally. What on earth would we do with the other one?
> >> Oh, and Balloo isn't, as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Maybe something should be done about that.
>
> Too late. Eleanor is almost five months old and is getting
> her first tooth.
Ah yeah, I'd forgotten about that. Sleep, and other fond memories.
Never mind. The first eighteen years are the worst, by many accounts.
Adrian Smith
b...@lloo.at.REMOVEpenis.dot.com (the_mighty_balloo) wrote:
> Now Adrian, just because Stain left usenet for a prolonged period
> of time claiming it to have been a planned absence doesn't mean
> he was sp*
>
> Oh. Yes. Funny how that cuts both ways, isn't it?
I hadn't actually noticed that parallel, but now that you mention it...
the_mighty_balloo
> the_mighty_balloo wrote:
> [..]
>
>>>>> *plonk*
>>>>
>>>> So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is required.
>>>
>>> I spanked him last time I was here.
>
>> Stain spanked Texas Tom.
>
> We know.
He also awarded him a Fullbright scholarship and paid for him
to spend two years on the Costa del Sol while Stain subsisted
on 79¢ 7-11 chili cheese dogs. Now that is altruism.
>> He's also an authority on H.L. Mencken.
>
> You shouldn't, in the age of Deja News, pretend to have won
> a flamewar that you lost by such a huge margin.
Heh. I take it you didn't spend your months away from usenet
reading Mencken's posthumously published journals. Just out
of curiosity, Stain, why did you latch on to that *particular*
lost cause? I wasn't flaming you, merely mentioning a fact
about a writer I admired, an anecdote to be shared amongst
friends. I'd assumed you admired him as well, as you had
quoted him... but YOU knew you were completely ignorant
of the life and works of Mencken, why did you spend a month
prior to your fleeing usenet denying the man was an antisemite?
Why did you keep coming back to that point that you had so
decisively lost?
Not that I care, it's just funny to see you twist yourself
into knots like a hagfish attempting to rid itself of the
envelope of poisonous slime it created and wishes from which
to escape.
The Phantom Menace
<by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
> Adrian Smith <adrian_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >> > Well, *someone* certainly played bottom dog in the aforementioned
that
> >> > subsequently disappeared for several months, evidently to run
> >> > victory laps around his apartment, is a deeply novel one.
> >>
> >> That won't wash, either. Had you been paying attention, you would
> >> have noticed that going on sabbatical for a while, usually in the
> >> latter part of the year, is standard practice for yours truly.
>
> > years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
> > lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say
hello
> > to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
>
> documented fecklessness.
>
overwhelming
> > desire to immerse your butt in some glacier-fed mountain stream, to
the
> > accompaniment of a glad 'Sssss...', a cloud of steam and a heartfelt
> > sigh of relief, though curious coincidences surround us on all
sides.
>
> Baaaaaaaackpedal, baaaaaaaaaaaackpedal.
[popcorn goes flying in the audience]
e-cology
--
"Thou art a DUMB CLUCK."
- Moe Howard
Dan Nelson
>
> Avoid escribió en artículo:
>
> > [..]
> >
> >>>>> *plonk*
> >>>>
> >>>> So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is required.
> >>>
> >>> I spanked him last time I was here.
> >
> >> Stain spanked Texas Tom.
> >
> > We know.
>
> to spend two years on the Costa del Sol while Stain subsisted
> on 79¢ 7-11 chili cheese dogs. Now that is altruism.
In all fairness, I must protest. Those chili cheese dogs are quite
good, if you have a taste for junk food, which I unfortunately do.
--
Dan Nelson
Procurator of Lids and Seals for the Royal Court of Cans and Jars
Her majesty the Queen, presiding
MHM 27x20
myster...@my-deja.com
> >
> > >On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal
situations."
> > ><by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >>In alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk The Phantom Menace
> > >>
> > >> [..]
> > >>
> > >> *plonk*
> > >
> > >So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is required.
> > >
> > I spanked him last time I was here.
>
> didst yon spanking.
And it SURE AS HELL wasn't you, shit-stained underwear-wearing STAR-
WARS GEEK.
>
> e-maculated
Fuckwit.
myster...@my-deja.com
> >
> > > > Well, *someone* certainly played bottom dog in the
aforementioned
> > > > scenario. But the idea that it was anyone other than the party
> that
> > > > subsequently disappeared for several months, evidently to run
> > > > victory laps around his apartment, is a deeply novel one.
> > >
> > > That won't wash, either. Had you been paying attention, you
would
> > > have noticed that going on sabbatical for a while, usually in the
> > > latter part of the year, is standard practice for yours truly.
> >
> > Had I found the motivation to read a.f assiduously over a period of
> > years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
> > lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say
hello
> > to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
> >
overwhelming
> > desire to immerse your butt in some glacier-fed mountain stream, to
> the
> > accompaniment of a glad 'Sssss...', a cloud of steam and a heartfelt
> > sigh of relief, though curious coincidences surround us on all
sides.
> >
be
> > saying earlier that TT would be toast, academically speaking, were
> that
> > little slip of his you so slyly engineered to become common
knowledge
> > among his peers. So why don't we go and look for them, on sci.lang
or
> > some mailing list (balloo may have some suggestions, if you don't
> > consider his input too biased)? Of course, being in all probability
> > serious individuals with work to do, they may need a certain amount
of
> > buttering up before they're willing to consider something as earth-
> > shattering as what happened on a.f over two years ago.
> >
> > You'd better leave that bit to me. Not that I especially enjoy being
> > polite or anything, but under the circumstances getting them to even
> > read the exchange concerned is likely to require near-fellatial
> > obsequiousness, not to mention refraining from xposting back here.
> >
> > Whaddya say?
>
Then you'd better file down those ugly, yellowish-green snags that you
have the gall to call teeth. He may not want his penis tattoed with
your bite marks.
The Phantom Menace
Suren hell wudn't *YOU* either, DOWNLOADER OF CHILD PRON.
> > e-maculate
>
> Fuckwit.
Porndog.
e-bee
--
"AOL really helps with anonymous trolling."
"How can an ISP make someone so pissed off?? You really have issues."
- Poor, poor Cock Rocket. (Ref:
<3a27ab05...@news.earthlink.net>)
By Archie Leach
> Stain spanked Texas Tom.
Dubious achievement. John Dobbs could spank Texas Tom. For crying out
loud, even the otherwise-utterly-useless Kristine Tanner slapped Texas
Tom around like Gary Kasparov steamrolling a whole school district's'
worth of 8th graders simultaneously.
> He's also an authority on H.L. Mencken.
Menckhead.
ISO9000-compliant since a week ago Wednesday
++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Fuck you, Nikk.. you need to die. This is no longer about an argument
in a thread or anything else.. you make every little bit of it personal,
or attempt to do so, and for that you must die. I ask you.. please..
jump off of a cliff, in front of a truck.. take one for the team. The
world needs less pieces of shit like you on the planet."--words of genus
from M1A1Hokie
By Archie Leach
> Yon varlet apeareth to mine visonage to
> be-eth a rogue BETABASIX sock; verily to be
> SPNAKED senseless by the mighty
> TJANNER. Hide thine eyes and weep not, for
> thy blah blah blah.
>
> Fuck Shakespeare.
Fuck Head.
By Archie Leach
> That won't wash, either. Had you been paying > attention, you would
have noticed that going
> on sabbatical for a while, usually in the latter
> part of the year, is standard practice for yours > truly.
Translation:
"Like the swallows returning to San Juan Capistrano, getting SPANKed has
become a necessary annual ritual for me."
By Archie Leach
> > It needs Gilbert, doesn't it?
>
> van Buren Wilkes IV or Sullivan?
"AFLAC!!!!"
"AFLAC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!''
"AAAAAAAAAAFFFFFFFF-LAAAAAAAAACCC!!!!!!!"
By Archie Leach
> <Kirk>
>This is like watching those guys in Plymouth
> Plantation putting on a pilgrims-imitation
> show.
> </Kirk>
>
> I swear da Gawd I can feel Stain's head
> hurting from here.
Alas, I don't think he particularly likes the sensation of having your
saliva constantly coating his "brownie".
Khaveen Abdul Ca-non
<the__phan...@my-deja.com> in <90cf3j$8h3$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> in
alt.fan.hell-flame-wars wrote:
>There Be No Shelter Here for myster...@my-deja.com:
>> In article <902vfu$ppd$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
>> The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> > There Be No Shelter Here for Big Daddy Zeus:
>> > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:41:08 +0000, Hogarth <hog...@eircom.net>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal
>> situations."
>> > > ><by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >>In alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk The Phantom Menace
>> > <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [..]
>> > > >>
>> > > >> *plonk*
>> > > >
>> > > >So where have you been, Stain? I think an explanation is
>required.
>> > > >
>> > > I spanked him last time I was here.
>> >
>> > It wasn't you, Hell Flame Wars guy. T'was William Shakespeare whom
>> > didst yon spanking.
>>
>> And it SURE AS HELL wasn't you, shit-stained underwear-wearing STAR-
>> WARS GEEK.
>
>Suren hell wudn't *YOU* either, DOWNLOADER OF CHILD PRON.
Sure as fuck that is lame.
Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
lames against Hannigan. Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
(f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty. You are a lame flamer poser. An
elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
>
>> > e-maculate
>>
>> Fuckwit.
>
>Porndog.
Pedo (F)lamer
--
K. A. Cannon
Usenet Miscreant
troll at hell-flame-wars dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)
Duly elected moderator of a.f.s.
Without words books would not exist.
-Wurk (23 Dec 1998)
____________________
Teach a man to make a fire, and he will be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
-John A. Hraster
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
[..]
>> >> > Well, *someone* certainly played bottom dog in the aforementioned
>> >> > scenario. But the idea that it was anyone other than the party
>> >> > that subsequently disappeared for several months, evidently to
>> >> > run victory laps around his apartment, is a deeply novel one.
>> >>
>> >> That won't wash, either. Had you been paying attention, you would
>> >> have noticed that going on sabbatical for a while, usually in the
>> >> latter part of the year, is standard practice for yours truly.
>>
>> > Had I found the motivation to read a.f assiduously over a period of
>> > years, perhaps in order to compile an illustrated history of pocket
>> > lint, doubtless I would. As it is, I pop in now and then to say
>> > hello to Menjy, and to see if balloo's up to anything.
>>
>> In which case you're in no position to complain about your well-
>> documented fecklessness.
> I ain't complaining about *mine*. You can go off on as many
> conveniently-timed sabbaticals as you like.
*evil grin*
See my reply to Mr. Capoeman.
>> I have better things to do. In fact, I have better things
>> to do than a thimblewit like you could possibly imagine.
> Just don't overinflate her - you'll void the warranty.
Q. E. D.
Avoid normal situations.
> Avoid escribió en artículo:
[..]
>> The sole reason that I kept the "Who Spanked Texas Tom?" thread going
>> as long as I did was to donate enough rope for you and Balloo to hang
>> yourselves (which you both, natch, did).
> So every time you run from an argument for a few months is an
> indicator to you that you've won that argument?
Last June, you were claiming that the thread was over. Now you're claiming
that I ran from it. At least get your story straight.
As far as actual indicators that I won such an argument... well, let's
document that a little.
Exhibit A:
[ begin included text ]
Re: Howard's End (was: Thought for the day)
Author: the_mighty_balloo <b...@lloo.at.REMOVEpenis.dot.com>
Date: 2000/06/30
Forum: alt.flame
Avoid normal situations escribió en artículo:
[ much cut for space -Ed. ]
> The Keegan tactic of flying in the face of bare facts and making
> lots of noise in the hopes of getting somebody to believe you by
> sheer force of repetition won't work for you, either. In fact, it
> has yet to work.
Thank you. The topic under discussion is of course "Did Stain
Spank Texas Tom?" The answer is no. Thank you, good night,
drive safely, don't forget to tip your waitress and remember Stain's
closing paragraph when Menjy takes votes for PKB of the year.
[ end included text ]
How about IKYABWAI of the year?
Exhibit B:
[ begin included text ]
Re: Howard's End
Author: the_mighty_balloo <b...@lloo.at.REMOVEpenis.dot.com>
Date: 2000/06/30
Forum: alt.flame
Avoid normal situations. escribió en artículo:
> the_mighty_balloo wrote:
>: Avoid normal situations escribió en artículo:
[ much deleted for space - Ed.]
>:>: When added to your curious hostility to unbiased testimony that
>:>: refutes your position with regards to that particular episode
>:>
>:> HAR!
>
>: Howie left the country to continue research into his doctoral
>: dissertation.
>
> So you claim (suspiciously without substantiation).
Why is that suspicious? Who gives out RL information in alt.flame?
> Besides, he went on and
> on about how he'd be back in October, a party line shored up by his
> then- compatriot Adrian. He never returned.
If I could get grant money to loaf around southern Spain I wouldn't
come back either.
> That you and Adrian waited until now to start defending him isn't
> terribly convincing, either. At least not in the way that you desire.
I'm not defending Howie. That cocksucker is slurping back
marguritas on my tax dollars. Fuck him. But your claims that
his absence has some causal connection to anything you've ever
done in your life is just about the most ludicrous thing I've
ever heard.
[ end included text ]
"I'm not defending Texas Tom! I'm not! But he's in southern Spain doing
research and not spanked! And he's brilliant in Arabic linguistics! And
the idea that you spanked him is the most ludicrous thing I've ever heard!
But I'm not defending him!"
Jesus Christ Almighty. How... WilfLeBlanckian. Especially considering
that you proceeded to, uh, "not defend him" at such tremendous lengths in
the rest of the thread. Not to mention your having broken the hyperbole
meter with that last sentence (and the two-dollar words didn't help with
anyone who was paying attention).
I mean, the sonofawhore couldn't even handle ENGLISH, as shown by his
numerous spelling and grammar errors in every post, much less Arabic --
demonstrating that he's gotten by in his field by ass-sucking rather
than virtue. Does anyone but you really believe that he magically transformed
into a literate, artistic genius whenever he turned off his newsreader?
But there's even more. Here's the very last article I wrote in the thread,
to which you never responded. You know, the thread from which you claim I
ran? (Reposted in full, for your viewing pleasure...)
Exhibit C:
[ begin included text ]
Re: Howard's End
Author: Avoid normal situations. <see...@NOSPAM.netcom.com>
Date: 2000/07/11
Forum: alt.flame
In alt.flame the_mighty_balloo <b...@lloo.at.removepenis.dot.com> wrote:
: Avoid normal situations. escribió en artículo:
[..]
:> [ "Mencken's a Jew Hater!" ]
:>
:>:> You keep saying this, and you keep implying that not knowing this
:>:> (assuming it's true) is some sort of damning character flaw on my
:>:> part. As if I'm supposed to budge an inch from behind my cozy little
:>:> workstation to rush out and try to disprove a contention *you* made.
:>
:>: You quoted a famous man without knowing enough about him to understand
:>: the irony of the quote, Stain. That's not a character flaw. It just
:>: means that in that particular instance you really didn't know what
:>: you were talking about,
:>
:> ...just as many people will speak of what a hero Winston Churchill
:> was, being blissfully ignorant of the fact that he had every
:> intention of using poison gas if England was invaded by the N*zis.
:> Biiiiiiiiiig deal.
: Are you trying to make a point? Wouldn't *ANY* defence of his
: homeland from the Nazis be heroic?
No. A little point made by Gregory Peck in _The Guns of Navarone_ comes
to mind... "the only way to win a war is by being every bit as nasty as
the enemy".
: How can you compare the genocide
: committed by Nazi Germany with a defense strategem to keep your
: countrymen from suffering a likewise fate?
And so, Balloo resorts to yet another dishonest debating tactic in this
thread: the straw man.
: But then, how can someone claim credit for forcing someone from
: accessing usenet newsgroups when their alleged "victim" was refraining
: from participating in usenet discussions due to academic interests?
Indeed. He refrained from participating in usenet discussions due to an
interest in not being hung out to dry by other academics.
Since you and a few other people have such difficulty with this idea, and
since this thread has been more or less dormant for the last week, I'll
explain this one... more... time.
Of course Howard was humiliated lots of other times. Getting caught not
recognizing a Shakespeare reference was the first time, however, that had
severe potential RL repercussions. The line ("There are many things in
heaven and earth, Horatio, that are undreamt of in your philosophy")
was not quite well-known enough to be widely recognized (e.g. "To be or
not to be"), but sufficiently famous such that somebody who was trying
to convince everybody how cultured and erudite he was would have absolutely
no excuse for missing it. It was perfect.
See, I went to college, too. I've had to breathe the same air as Howard's
kind of people more times than I'd care to admit. I also used to have a
friend who was an English major who confirmed all my darkest suspicions
about the humanities departments, and who was delighted to tell me more
and worse horror stories than I had witnessed myself. (He used to swear
up and down that he'd expose them all for what hypocrites they are, but
he turned out to be all mouth. But that's another story.)
Most people are all front and all window dressing, but Arts and Crafts
students really abuse the privilege. It's basically the same old adolescent
clique games that everybody used to play in high school, only many times
worse because the stakes are so much higher. And all that that implies.
Howard didn't just confirm how vicious his cronies were. He *bragged*
about it.
"Sorry, Stain, the large amount of free time we get relative to hours at
work, is always one of the big laughs at the academic coffee house on
Monday mornings as we watch you lot scurry about."
-- TT, in <hdmiller-090...@remote3-arap48.cis.yale.edu>
See?
It doesn't even matter if he somehow had some defense and really did
know the reference. Far less damning pieces of evidence could have led
to his doom, not unlike how that government official lost his job for
publically using the word "niggardly" not too long ago. What does the
truth matter to people like Howard Delgin Miller?
I can just see it now...
It was a breezy Connecticut morning as Howard walked into the academic
coffee house. Doffing his overcoat and hanging it on the handcarved wooden
coathook by the front door, he made his way over to his usual table. The
usual faces sat in: there was Stephen, wearing his favorite tie, and
nosing through Kierkegaard... there was Paul, as usual fingering his pipe
due to the house prohibition on his lighting it... and there was Professor
Toler ("Dick" to friends), Howard's thesis advisor... and all the others,
their appearance yielding the usual comfort of familiarity.
As a matter of fact, it was literally that... *all* the others.
I haven't seen the whole gang all together since Christmas, thought
Howard. I wonder what's the occasion?
Howard sat down. "Good morning, fellas. How are you?"
Dick had been watching him come in. Suddenly he broke eye contact and
turned to the others. "One... two... three."
All at once, everyone at the table except Howard produced a computer
printout and held it up to Howard's sight.
The printout was of a certain 1998 Usenet article.
Any good horror director knows that silence is the most terrifying sound
of all. That very sound bore heavily down on Howard's usual table. On
Howard himself most of all.
He knew... exactly... what was happening to him. He knew exactly what they
were doing to him. Because he had done it, with them, to so many others.
How they had all loaded up the venom, and unloaded it all on Charles
Wedgeworth, who had been one of Yale's most promising young English students
until Dean had seen him alone by the Farmington River, singing along with his
secret collection of Motley Crue CDs. He remembered similar broadsides...
at Lucy, who'd been found nosing through the "Adult Books" section in that
quiet roadside bookshop in East Hartford where Beverly was fond of seeking
obscure editions of her favorite Steinbecks (Howard remembered because Harry
had broken his engagement to her within the hour; one for the record books,
that one was)... at Philip, who'd had the unsound judgment... nay, the
UNMITIGATED GALL... to speak warmly of true-crime books while soused at
Emily's coming-out bash... at Gail, who'd fallen asleep during one of
Dick's afterdinner speeches on how much English poetry had been unforgivably
torched by the Puritans.
How he had laughed and laughed... even, alone in his room, weeks, *months*
after the fact... at the deer-in-the-oncoming-headlights looks on their
faces. The rejection. The ridicule.
But suddenly the memories weren't funny anymore. Because now they were
coming for him.
And all that Charles and Gail and the others had done, that had no
reflection whatever on how educated they really were. Even Lucy's huge-ass
penis pictures were more defensible for a Yale doctoral candidate than...
than...
Part of him, deep inside, had always known this was coming. How quickly,
after the offending article had arrived on the computer thingy, he had told
everyone he was retiring from the Usenet groups... and how gullibly so
many had believed him. (Ah, the joys of being a practiced liar. An academic
career teaches some useful skills after all, he'd smugly observed.) Thank
God he'd had such an excellent excuse, what with the Fulbright trip to
Spain coming up. It wasn't long before he even believed it himself, and
he thought no more about the matter.
But how... deeply offended, to use a completely inadequate phrase, for
want of any better... he was, to have this door that he'd nailed shut in
his mind, and left for so long, brutally ripped open.
Not being able to bear to look at the unmistakable rictuses of sadistic
glee on the faces of his colleagues and closest friends, he looked at the
umpteen-reproduced article. He knew what was there.
There, in plain black and white, was Stain's jest... put two columns
to the right by the quoted-article marks, per Usenet convention: "There
are more things in heaven and earth, Fuckheado, than are dreamt of in
your philosophy."
Right below was that reply that Howard had so rushed out, so full of his
red mist, so determined to not let some computer nerd get the better of him.
Why didn't he wait? "Kaptain Stain's Cliche Machine! Guaranteed to turn any
piece of writing into a steaming puddle of hackneyed piss, in fifty words or
less. Available at a Walmart near you."
And right below that:
"<archive>
"Creeeeeeeeeeeeak... CLANG!
"Act 1, Scene 5, Verse 175."
Howard said nothing, of course. What could he say?
Finally Stephen broke the silence. "Really, Howard. Somebody on alt.flame
knows the Bard better than you do?"
Paul chimed in without missing a beat. "You know, you quote Hawthorne
and Catullus so much I used to think you had their entire works memorized.
Now it turns out you don't even have a good working knowledge of Shakespeare?"
Dick turned to look at the boys once more. "What was I telling you the
other day about how I always suspected it was all cribwork before hand? What'd
I tell ya?"
Howard had to use all his strength to keep his voice from cracking. It was
still too loud, however. "It was a cliche! You can see what I wrote right
there! It was a cliche!"
"Riiiiight." George took no time at all to reply. It was doubly chilling
to hear, since Howard had picked up using "riiiiight" himself from all the
times George had said it, with just the right level of sarcasm...
Dick didn't even try to hide his smirk. "Sorry, Howard, but we have
reputations to uphold." With that, came the disconnect gesture that Howard had
seen him and the others perform so many times: the turning of the head just
slightly away, as if he'd only just spoken to a smelly bum to whom he'd
given the time of day. Giving Howard no time at all to reply: "Let's go,
men. We're finished here."
Paul turned to Stephen. "Yeah, I have to go pick up a copy of a book for my
parents. It's _A Christmas Carol_, by... what's that guy's name again?"
Paul and Stephen simultaneously broke into laughs so restrained, so
minimalist, that they sounded more like wheezes. It was so perfect that
it just had to have been rehearsed.
Everyone, except Howard, rose from the table and filed out, just fast
enough to be not quite running. As they did, Howard, too dazed to move, was
lightly pelted with bright yellow booklets. All of Dick's party had brought
one.
The party was almost out the door before Howard realized what they were.
They were Cliffs Notes for _Hamlet_ and most of Shakespeare's other plays.
Howard just had to make one last try. Right before the abyss. "Dick...
you're still going to be my advisor for my Eli doctorate, aren't you?"
That tore it. They had been bursting at the seams to maintain dead
silence for maximum effect, but they just couldn't hold back any longer.
The roars of laughter filled the room. They drew the stares of everyone
but the two old men in the corner who, as usual, were too focused on
their chess game to notice anything short of nuclear annihilation. They
shook the Staffordshire in the glass cupboards on the far side of the
room.
Without another word, they left.
If you've ever had a severe injury, you know that there's markedly
little pain at first. You're too numb from the general overload.
Such was Howard Delgin Miller, as he sat with the cups of cold coffee and
the check, wearing his complimentary Cliffs Notes. Intellectually, he knew
what was happening to him, but on a gut level he was as yet getting only a
glimpse.
There was no place he could go. His circle of friends was too closely
knit. He knew that, all week, he'd be played variations on this same theme
by his other friends... his other linguistics professors... his lover...
Howard shed a single tear. He let it roll down his cheek. It was one
more tear than anyone else would shed for him.
Flashforward to Arkham Asylum. Home sweet home. Right next door to
Felix's endless raving about the bugs that only he could see, and across the
corridor from the lady who's in love with Abraham Lincoln, Howard
Delgin Miller still bears his favorite writing implement, demonstrating
his cultural superiority. Or as much of it as he can, anyhow, with his
arms in straitjacket and a crayon grasped with his toe.
As he lies on the warm padded floor, his saliva pools by his face as
his blankly staring eyes relive Stephen's and Paul's wheeze-laugh over
and over, for eternity. Yet, in a demonstration of the indomitability of
the human spirit, he still brandishes his mighty flaming ability that
made him the terror of Usenet readers everywhere.
"....wage ... slave...
"........wage ... slave..."
:>: I altruistically leaped in to help you by
:>: providing information of which you were woefully ignorant and you've
:>: been in whining denial ever since. *I* don't care that you're
:>: factually weak on the subjects you choose for conversation. If I
:>: did care I'd just killfile you rather than slap you around your
:>: newsgroup.
:>
:>: And no, I don't expect you to budge an inch from behind your work-
:>: station to verify the veracity of a statement of common knowledge
:>: made about a subject of your choosing. I'd expect you to fire up
:>: a search engine and take thirty seconds to avoid making a further
:>: idiot of yourself.
:>
:> For one thing, I would never use the net to do research if it was
:> at all feasible to use good old-fashioned books; just because some
:> fuckhead put something into HTML doesn't make it true.
: Heh. Remember after the TWA flight 800 crash back in 1996, Pierre
: Salinger claimed he had "evidence" the aircraft and all 230 passengers
: had been shot down by a US Navy missle? His "evidence" was a forged
: document he found on the internet written by some conspiracy kook.
I'm totally unsurprised.
:> Books usually
:> at least have some sort of editor/publisher quality-control hurdle.
: That's why kooks like to own their own printing presses. Mussolini
: was a student of Stalins and envisioned a socialist paradise for all
: of Italy until France offered him a printing press of his own if he'd
: lobby for Italian participation on the allied side in WWI.
: Books are no more reliable than web pages.
Some crap still makes it into print, true, but the process of natural
selection introduced by the higher hurdle tends to weed it out... just as
sf movies were, on average, a little better during times when the genre
wasn't so popular with John Q. Ticketbuyer. You didn't get more daring stuff
like _Blade Runner_, but you didn't get _Star Kid_ either.
:> For another, I won't spend those thirty seconds just on principle,
:> since the burden of proof is on you...
: How is the burden of proof on me?
You were the one who made the contention that Mencken was antiSemitic.
: You were the one who initially
: quoted Mencken; just because you've proven your ignorance of the
: man doesn't mean that the quote was inapplicable, and I never said
: that it was. I pointed out a bit of irony and you became defensive
: because you didn't understand the dichotomy inherant in the quote.
: You "single sourced" your material, Stain.
All of this falls right down if Mencken really wasn't, or if no proof
exists that he was antiSemitic. You keep acting like you've already scored
this point, and hoping that if you strut and prance enough that you'll
snow people into believing you, but you've still posted no proof.
: Is there a burden of proof upon me beyond pointing out your error?
: Remember that if you'd known what you were talking about this thread
: wouldn't have come into being, let alone your admission of ignorance
: as to the personal philosophy of a writer you chose to quote. If
: this weren't alt.flame I suppose I could cite the book in which
: Mencken's personal letters were posthumously published, but I much
: prefer seeing you twist in the wind like this. It's such an apt
: metaphor for your participation in this entire thread.
A likely story. A more likely one is that you're hoping that if you can
pile it on high and deep enough you'll persevere. Unfortunately, this is
Usenet and not academia, and thus some actually rational people can be
found on the premises from time to time.
Besides... even if you did post proof, and it turned out Mencken really
was a Jew hater... so what? Bad people can say astute things, just like
D.W. Griffith was a racist bastard, yet still made a towering masterpiece
like _Intolerance_.
:>:>: Howard and I had written papers on the same subject. We had lengthy
:>:>: discussions on the matter. You weren't involved and there is a
:>:>: reason for that, Jack. You're not interested in the subject.
:>:>
:>:> That I wouldn't be caught dead carrying on a serious discussion with
:>:> Texas Twat is an even better reason. I put up with enough idiot
:>:> savants at work (for which I'll never be paid enough) without
:>:> volunteering myself for the company of idiot idiots.
:>
:>: In the field of Arabic linguistics Howie is brilliant.
:>
:> So what does that translate to in normal intelligence? That he was
:> indeed able to walk and chew gum at the same time? And how far off
:> a log does a techie like myself have to fall to accomplish the same
:> things?
: You can't even look up a famous writer who published his works in
: the same language and the same century as you, Stain.
YM "won't". HTH.
: Comparing
: your ineptitude to someone receiving awards and accolades for their
: own efforts does you little service here. Howie will earn a doctorate,
Assuming that nobody has found or will find out that he missed a
Shakespeare reference in public.
: and you will earn the disapprobation of your peers
What peers?
:>:>: I'd hate to
:>:>: go out on a limb here, but chances are good that you're totally
:>:>: ignorant of it.
:>:>
:>:> Oh gosh golly jeepers!
:>
:>: I'm beginning to notice a pattern building here.
:>
:> Not even I know everything. Shocking, isn't it?
: Not after reading your commentary in this thread. After seeing
: the effort which you will expend to retain your state of ignorant
: bliss I'm surprised you can maintain an internet connection.
"I want to know why he was wearing special gaiters!"
:>:>: I believed him when he told me of his planned
:>:>: trip to Spain. I don't believe you when you say that his absence
:>:>: from usenet is due to your humiliating him. He was constantly
:>:>: being humiliated. He had no shame. He didn't care. Nothing you
:>:>: wrote was all that damaging. I'm not covering his butt, but I'm
:>:>: also not refraining from swinging the board down when you stick
:>:>: your dick in the clapper. Take one, scene thirtyfour, a bored
:>:>: amateur screenwriter clutches his traumatized wee-wee and dances
:>:>: around the newsgroup...
:>:>
:>:> All of which is a really cute and clever way of not backing up your
:>:> claim that I didn't spank him with a shred of proof.
:>
:>: Burden of proof is not on me, Stain.
:>
:> I made a claim that I spanked him, which I backed up with logic and
:> evidence. You're making a claim that I didn't, which you've STILL not
:> supported with any evidence.
: I would have thought my word would have been good enough. Fortunately
: someone else posted a url of the list of 1999/2000 Fulbright Scholars,
############
BWA HA HA!
: at http://www.iie.org/fulbright/fpa/9900ctry.htm which listed
: /*
: * Miller, Howard D.
: * MA, 1998, Yale University
: * Mozarabic legal theory and practice in Toledo, 1085-1300
: */
: Looks like not only has Howie been working on his dissertation, but
: has received a *very* prestigious and lucrative award for doing so.
Looks like you're deliberately trying to avoid reminding everyone that
it was Miller who posted the URL himself, lest all too clear a picture of
behind-the-scenes events appear to the observer.
"Please, Howard! Save us, Howard! We're getting killed out here!"
:>: and you desperately running around attempting
:>: to place props up under the collapsing structure of your argument.
:>
:> On the contrary. The longer you and Adrian try to defend a total
:> schmuck like H. D. Miller,
: ...Fulbright scholar and Eli doctoral candidate...
The less your status is dependent on empirical merit in a given hierarchy,
the more dependent your status is on your political skills. What's more,
the more that I read about politics, the more I find that anything resembling
character or decency works against you in such endeavors.
Hence, it's not surprising that a total sack of shit like Texas Tom would
prosper in a gray-area field like yours, and in academia especially. After
all, who could possibly envy Howard D. Miller?
BTW, what's it like being an Arts & Crafts student, anyway? What's it like
living in mortal terror that you might slip and assert an Incorrect Opinion
and therefore be outcast in no time flat, laying waste to years of work and
commitment? What's it like having all that competition from all those other
people who don't want to do any real work for a living? Doesn't all that
asskissing get tiresome? Aren't you worried that someday your lips are going
to freeze that way?
I presume that you're now back because the missus has finally given birth.
Congratulations. There's not that many species that can breed in captivity.
:> the more face you jokers are going to lose even if you do somehow
:> manage to establish a reasonable doubt that I booted his ass
:> screaming into the net.void...
: This coming from the steak tartar in the spreading pool of blood
: still somehow managing to grip Occam's Razor by the blade...
I don't really have any response to this. I just left it in because it's
such a totally silly attempt at a flame, and as such ups your autoflame
score in this post. I am pleasantly reminded of TT's even more ridiculous
"I'm the sole reason that you exist!1!" assertion in the thread in which
I spanked him.
:> just as Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.
:> probably didn't mean to defend the N*zis
: Fuck it, I'm calling Godwin on this thread.
This is the third time you've tried to end the thread. Speaks volumes,
it does. It is rather sensible of you to do your best to run while not
looking like you're running... before the hopelessness of defending Howard
and the vacuity of your arguments become any plainer.
I wonder how Adrian's popcorn franchise is doing. *cackle*
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"To put their research into action, the Green researchers developed a
prototype device called the Star7, a remote control-like gadget that could
communicate with others of its own kind. The original idea was to develop the
Star7 operating system in C++, the hugely popular object-oriented programming
language developed by Bjarne Stroustrup. However, Green project member James
Gosling became fed up with how C++ was performing on the task, so he
barricaded himself in his office and wrote a new language to better handle
the Star7. The language was named Oak, in honor of a tree Gosling could see
out his office window."
-- Laura Lemay and Roger Cadenhead, _Teach Yourself Java 2 in 21 Days_
[ end included text ]
Best of all:
[ begin first reposted article ]
Re: Thought for the day
Author: Adrian Smith <adrian_...@yahoo.com>
Date: 2000/06/28
Forum: alt.flame
In article <8jbmre$ulv$1...@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>,
"Avoid normal situations." <see...@NOSPAM.netcom.com> wrote:
[ much deleted for space -Ed. ]
> By the by, why you and Balloo would pick a fight like this
> completely escapes me.
We have facts.
BTW, if you're really going to take Balloo on (and I'm not sure he's
hugely bothered, but he could probably be provoked), can I have the
popcorn franchise?
[ end first reposted article ]
[ begin second reposted article ]
Re: Howard's End (was: Thought for the day)
Author: H.D. Miller <hdmi...@pantheon.yale.edu>
Date: 2000/07/03
Forum: alt.flame
In article <8jj8m5$87r$1...@slb0.atl.mindspring.net>, "DKIA"
<dk...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> the_mighty_balloo wrote in message <8F6361734o...@24.2.10.79>...
> >Avoid normal situations escribió en artículo:
>
> >Thank you. The topic under discussion is of course "Did Stain
> >Spank Texas Tom?" The answer is no. Thank you, good night,
> >drive safely, don't forget to tip your waitress and remember Stain's
> >closing paragraph when Menjy takes votes for PKB of the year.
>
>
> If I'm around it'll certainly get my vote for top PKB of the year,
> but the big question here is why you're even bothering to debate
> the subject, Balloo. There isn't a single person who was here at the time of
> Texas Tom's departure that believes for a second Stain had anything to do
> with Howard's departure.
Holy Christ on a Cracker, Stain (a slithering, empty-headed, mealy-mouthed
moron if ever there was one) is claiming he spanked me?
Fuck, boy, I got a damn Fulbright to go to Spain.
http://www.iie.org/fulbright/fpa/9900ctry.htm
Now Stainly can run around here like a stroppy three-year-old weeping
his widdle eyes out and producing the longest damn posts in the history of
the medium, but it won't change the simple fact that my departure from
Usenet had nothing to do with his pathetic, sub-human efforts.
Nuff said.
H.D. Miller
(The Artist Formerly Known as Texas Tom)
[ end second reposted article ]
...first Adrian asked to be rescued by you, then you had to be rescued by
Texas Tom.
I mean, Jesus fucking Christ. You, a long-time veteran of the flame groups,
had not only to be RESCUED, but rescued by a flabby little shit like TEXAS
TOM.
That is the most staggeringly huge humiliation I've seen anyone on the
flame groups endure in a coon's age. I'm amazed you can actually bear to
still show your face around here. I'd rather have my arm amputated than suffer
something like that.
(Aside: I must say I like that bit from "Know It All" *chuckle*. "There
isn't a single person who was here at the time of Texas Tom's departure that
believes for a second Stain had anything to do with Howard's departure." When
you have facts on your side, you don't need a support group... not that some
HFW dirtbag would ever know that.
(I especially like that sign-off... "The Artist Formerly Known as Texas
Tom". All Arts and Crafts students dream of being real artists, but, for the
overwhelming majority of them, it will never happen, and it never should.
Namedrop they may, and pose they will, but none of 'em are fit even to lick
Spike Lee's basketball. They write about art, but they know nothing of art,
for they have no soul. ((tm) Anton Chekhov) If a real artist ever did enter
the same room as a parasitic insect like Howard Miller, the latter'd have to
run from the room, lest his head explode from sheer envy.
(Anyway...)
Do you realize that you and Adrian have staged the longest defense of an
absent flamer in the history of alt.flame? And of a not particularly
meritorious defendant, no less. Far more talented flamers have sank beneath
the waves with nary a ripple.
Let's not forget that neither of you have produced a shred of evidence to
support your sides. Not even the Fulbright URL counts, and not just because
Howard posted it rather than either of you. That Howard actually did get
such a scholarship makes the spank even better; it proves that he had even
more to lose when he was found out.
Let's also not forget the point that neither of you have dared touch with
the proverbial ten-foot pole: why, in Heaven's name, that you and Adrian
waited to dispute my authorship of his destruction until not only after I'd
claimed spank on him several times, not only after my spank of him was
nominated for Best Spank in the 1998 alt.flame Awards, but until TWENTY-ONE
MONTHS AFTER HE VANISHED.
I don't know what the real reason is that you've done so. Yet. But whatever
it is, it just can't be the reasons you stated... or any good reason for that
matter. I want to make some other sort of cruel remark about the traditional
love of mediocrity and resentment of excellence, but just that couldn't
possibly explain your and Adrian's zeal in the defense of such a pissant.
If you put the proverbial gun to my head, I'd say "drugs", but that's just
because that was the case with Haushalter, and because I was so impressed
with _Requiem for a Dream_.
I do know this, however: dirty little secrets like that have a way of
coming out. When this one does, people will talk. Possibly for threee
fucking weeks. Possibly longer. During which time what little face you
wankers have left will promptly evaporate. After all, if HFW has taught
us anything, it's that, no matter how bad your reputation is, it can always
get even worse.
Anyway... that's what I have to say about your "tee hee, we spanked you"
innuendo. Any questions?
> That dovetails
> nicely with your belief that people ridiculing you are paying
> you some form of flattery.
Not keeping up, still, I see.
> Hey, did you read any Mencken while you were gone?
Another assertion you've kept iterating endlessly without citing proof.
--
The Stainless "the key to propaganda is repetition" Steel Moviegoer
Avoid normal situations.
[..]
>>> He's also an authority on H.L. Mencken.
>>
>> You shouldn't, in the age of Deja News, pretend to have won
>> a flamewar that you lost by such a huge margin.
> Heh. I take it you didn't spend your months away from usenet
> reading Mencken's posthumously published journals. Just out
> of curiosity, Stain, why did you latch on to that *particular*
> lost cause? I wasn't flaming you, merely mentioning a fact
> about a writer I admired, an anecdote to be shared amongst
> friends. I'd assumed you admired him as well, as you had
> quoted him...
Actually, I suspect he personally resembled the "E.K. Hornbeck" character
in _Inherit the Wind_... only uglier, and even more miserable. Raw pain
and misanthropy usually don't pass muster in Hollywood flicks.
> but YOU knew you were completely ignorant
> of the life and works of Mencken,
Same old Balloo. Piling it high and deep.
> why did you spend a month
> prior to your fleeing usenet denying the man was an antisemite?
I never denied it at all. Please, *do* work on that reading comprehension.
> Why did you keep coming back to that point that you had so
> decisively lost?
You brought it up. (Again.) And how, exactly, did I "lose" when you
made the contention and then never backed it up with anything but lung
power?
> Not that I care, it's just funny to see you twist yourself
> into knots like a hagfish attempting to rid itself of the
> envelope of poisonous slime it created and wishes from which
> to escape.
Also, try to have something about which to be smug before deciding to be
so.
--
The Stainless "sheesh!" Steel Moviegoer
Avoid normal situations.
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000 03:36:39 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
> <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
>>> <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
[..]
>>> Troll.
>>
>> No.
> Sequestered?
Not really.
> --
> Big Daddy Zues, Stock Picking Genius.
Huh?
--
The Stainless Steel Moviegoer
The Phantom Menace
> The Phantom Menace wrote:
>
> > Yon varlet apeareth to mine visonage to
> > be-eth a rogue BETABASIX sock; verily to be
> > SPNAKED senseless by the mighty
> > TJANNER. Hide thine eyes and weep not, for
> > thy blah blah blah.
> >
> > Fuck Shakespeare.
>
> Fuck Head.
>
e-gret
The Phantom Menace
Shuddup. I wudn't twawkin' tuh yoo.
> Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
> lames against Hannigan.
What other PHANTOM MENACE could it be, FAT LAMER?
> Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
> (f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
Will you EVER forgive me, CHILD RAPER?
> You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty.
Ohhh yesIam.
> You are a lame flamer poser.
Define NON-POSING flamer, Crabby-keen.
> An elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
What a FINE mess your lip's in, MINI-BULLIS.
> >> > e-maculate
> >>
> >> Fuckwit.
> >
> >Porndog.
>
> Pedo (F)lamer
TOT TEASER.
e-go
The Phantom Menace
> >This is like watching those guys in Plymouth
> > Plantation putting on a pilgrims-imitation
> > show.
> > </Kirk>
> >
> > I swear da Gawd I can feel Stain's head
> > hurting from here.
>
> Alas, I don't think he particularly likes the sensation of having your
> saliva constantly coating his "brownie".
Don't you have some Dave Clark Five to study up on, DESTROYER OF
CASCADES?
e-nunciate
Paul Brothers
: scott campbell <s_campbel...@my-deja.com> wrote:
:> In article <9034ct$ph8$1...@og1.olagrande.net>,
:> "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
:>> 'Menjy' <me...@spamblockdatabasix.com> wrote:
:>> > Avoid normal situations. wrote:
:>> >>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
:>> >>> "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
: [..]
:>> >>> Troll.
:>> >>
:>> >> No.
:>>
:>> > Fuckhead?
:>>
:>> Reportedly.
:> Seconded.
: Fuckhead.
Fuckhead. :)
Dr. PNB
Adrian Smith
"Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
[...]
> I mean, the sonofawhore couldn't even handle ENGLISH, as shown by
> his numerous spelling and grammar errors in every post, much less
> Arabic -- demonstrating that he's gotten by in his field by ass-
> sucking rather than virtue. Does anyone but you really believe that
> he magically transformed into a literate, artistic genius whenever he
> turned off his newsreader?
He was an entertaining flamer at times, Sprain. Not to you, obviously.
But to some. He wasn't particularly concerned about proofreading, sure,
but even those of us who *are* sometimes wonder why we bother.
> mouthed moron if ever there was one) is claiming he spanked me?
>
> Fuck, boy, I got a damn Fulbright to go to Spain.
>
> http://www.iie.org/fulbright/fpa/9900ctry.htm
>
> Now Stainly can run around here like a stroppy three-year-old
> weeping his widdle eyes out and producing the longest damn posts in
> the history of the medium, but it won't change the simple fact that
> my departure from Usenet had nothing to do with his pathetic, sub-
> human efforts.
>
> Nuff said.
>
> H.D. Miller
> (The Artist Formerly Known as Texas Tom)
>
> [ end second reposted article ]
>
> ...first Adrian asked to be rescued by you, then you had to be
> rescued by Texas Tom.
Jesus, what you're capable of reading into things. I didn't need
rescuing - I was merely handing over to balloo, who didn't need my
assistance to complete your humiliation. And so he did, but...you
didn't realise. You went off on sabbatical thinking yourself victorious.
I believe it. Scary.
Still, you're back now.
> I mean, Jesus fucking Christ. You, a long-time veteran of the flame
> groups, had not only to be RESCUED, but rescued by a flabby little
> shit like TEXAS TOM.
>
> That is the most staggeringly huge humiliation I've seen anyone on
> the flame groups endure in a coon's age. I'm amazed you can actually
> bear to still show your face around here. I'd rather have my arm
> amputated than suffer something like that.
>
> (Aside: I must say I like that bit from "Know It All"
> *chuckle*. "There isn't a single person who was here at the time of
> Texas Tom's departure that believes for a second Stain had anything
> to do with Howard's departure." When you have facts on your side, you
> don't need a support group... not that some HFW dirtbag would ever
> know that.
Your 'facts' consist of nothing more than a disturbed fantasy of how
academic reputations are made and lost, apparently based on
extrapolations from whatever humiliations were heaped on you in high
school, and weird ideas about the (negligible) importance any comment
made on a recreational Usenet group might have to academics.
> (I especially like that sign-off... "The Artist Formerly Known as
> Texas Tom". All Arts and Crafts students dream of being real artists,
> but, for the overwhelming majority of them, it will never happen, and
> it never should. Namedrop they may, and pose they will, but none
> of 'em are fit even to lick Spike Lee's basketball. They write about
> art, but they know nothing of art, for they have no soul. ((tm) Anton
> Chekhov) If a real artist ever did enter the same room as a parasitic
> insect like Howard Miller, the latter'd have to run from the room,
> lest his head explode from sheer envy.
'The Artist Formerly Known As' is a reference to Prince, who did it
because he was pissed off with his record company. Nothing to do with
artistic pretensions. It's a 'cliche', y'know? One which shows
considerably more sign of having gone convincingly over your head than
your Shakespeare shite did of going over Howard's. Shame it wasn't a
film reference.
> (Anyway...)
>
> Do you realize that you and Adrian have staged the longest defense
> of an absent flamer in the history of alt.flame? And of a not
> particularly meritorious defendant, no less. Far more talented
> flamers have sank beneath the waves with nary a ripple.
> Let's not forget that neither of you have produced a shred of
> evidence to support your sides.
As balloo pointed out, burden of proof isn't on us. You have your
claim. We've demonstrated that your claim is risible. There is no way
that Howard's failure to give the source of a cliche he'd identified
*as* a cliche means *anything*. That's the thing about cliches - they
don't *need* to have their sources identified to anyone other than
coders combining pretensions to literacy with fucked-up ideas of what
it means.
That's a small group. Admittedly, everyone in it appears to agree with
you...
> Not even the Fulbright URL counts,
> and not just because Howard posted it rather than either of you. That
> Howard actually did get such a scholarship makes the spank even
> better; it proves that he had even more to lose when he was found out.
> Let's also not forget the point that neither of you have dared
> touch with the proverbial ten-foot pole: why, in Heaven's name, that
> you and Adrian waited to dispute my authorship of his destruction
> until not only after I'd claimed spank on him several times, not only
> after my spank of him was nominated for Best Spank in the 1998
> alt.flame Awards, but until TWENTY-ONE MONTHS AFTER HE VANISHED.
Can't speak for balloo, but when Kerro mentioned various antUers and
you replied 'Some of them made good victims', it was the first time I'd
realised that you took seriously the claims you'd made at the time,
which I do vaguely remember.
I don't see why you should place so much importance on a nomination by
(AFAIK) a single anonymous (unless I can persuade Menjy otherwise)
little wanker when you were quite happy, back in June, to plonk
everyone else who remembered the original exchange and said you were
one sadly deluded puppy. This ain't no democracy, sure, even if I would
be willing to bet on who's going to be a shoe-in for most tenuous spank
claim this year. But this could see you entered (heh) in even *less*
appealing categories.
> I don't know what the real reason is that you've done so. Yet. But
> whatever it is, it just can't be the reasons you stated... or any
> good reason for that matter. I want to make some other sort of cruel
> remark about the traditional love of mediocrity and resentment of
> excellence, but just that couldn't possibly explain your and Adrian's
> zeal in the defense of such a pissant.
I'm pretty sure we've both said this before, but to reiterate - it's
not about Howard, it's about your claim. It is constructed upon
foundations of purest fantasy, and although I worry *slightly* about
the psychological consequences of its (inevitable) collapse, I think it
all too probable that unless we get bored or have an attack of
conscience balloo and I will, in Howard's terms, continue to use you
like a five-dollar whore, occasionally exchanging ends for the sake of
variety and inviting passers-by to avail themselves of whatever orifice
we don't happen to be employing at the time. It'll all be doubtless
quite sociable, but if I were you I'd be asking myself what effect it
might be having on my long-term marriage prospects. Metaphorically
speaking.
> If you put the proverbial gun to my head, I'd say "drugs", but that's
> just because that was the case with Haushalter, and because I was so
> impressed with _Requiem for a Dream_.
> I do know this, however: dirty little secrets like that have a way
> of coming out. When this one does, people will talk. Possibly for
> threee fucking weeks. Possibly longer. During which time what little
> face you wankers have left will promptly evaporate. After all, if HFW
> has taught us anything, it's that, no matter how bad your reputation
> is, it can always get even worse.
>
> Anyway... that's what I have to say about your "tee hee, we spanked
> you" innuendo. Any questions?
Yep. Got lubricants?
--
Adrian Smith
The Phantom Menace
[thirty-fucking-four KB sent to Toys For Tots]
Mr. Chairman: From all appearances (lack of response, etc), this issue
has now officially been Lewinsky-ized. Anything further?
Mr. Starr: I'm going to think long and hard.
Mr. Clinton: [sandpapery drawl] That's wut got me in trouble inna first
place.
Mr. Chairman: I wasn't talking to you.
Texas Tom: May I speak?
Stain: Objection.
Mr. Chairman: Sustained.
Texas Tom: Hah?! Well, fuck this then!
Mr. Chairman: Mister Capoeman, anything further?
Mister Capoeman: Is the men's room equipped with a diaper station?
Stain: Objection.
Mr. Chairman: To what?
Stain: The special effects in last week's BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER.
Texas Tom: I'm not spanked. I'm in Spain.
Kirk: Where the fuck is Spain?
BDZbot: In your mom's hole.
Mr. Chairman: So what have we learned here, gentlemen? Anything?
Stain: DYOFDW.
Loafhead: Could you JERKS take this somewhere ELSE?
Menjy: Hee HEE! What'll YOU do about it?
Hogarth: Grandad! No church bean supper tonight?
Johnnie Cochran: If the dude's in Spain, no *spank* you'll gain!
Barry Scheck: These five liters of Stain's blood could have easily
been swapped. Look at these bloody swatches...
Suzieflame: Ewww!
THE PHANTOM MENACE: THERE you are...
Suzieflame: No I'm not! [runs]
Whoops: Can't you ever behave around the chicks, RICKY?
Mr. Chairman: We'll now hear from Adrian Smith.
Adrian Smith: The crux of the biscuit is thusly; that the
aforementioned spankee, albeit APPEARING to suffer an apropos
comeuppance...
Lurkers: What happened to the awards? [head for exits]
Menjy: What awards?
Humphries: Snuh?
Mysterian: CHILD RAPERuh?
Stain: I strongly object.
Mr. Chairman: To what?
Stain: The truth.
Ghost of Shakespeare: *plonk*
e-gull
--
"I am not on AOL (read the headers,newbie), and *I* *am* *in* *the*
*flonk*"
"AOL really helps with anonymous trolling."
"How can an ISP make someone so pissed off?? You really have issues."
- Poor, poor Cock Rocket. (Ref:
<3a27ab05...@news.earthlink.net>)
whoops
>On Sun, 03 Dec 2000 03:36:19 GMT, The Phantom Menace
><the__phan...@my-deja.com> in <90cf3j$8h3$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> in
>alt.fan.hell-flame-wars wrote:
>>
>>Suren hell wudn't *YOU* either, DOWNLOADER OF CHILD PRON.
>
>Sure as fuck that is lame.
>
>Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
>lames against Hannigan. Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
>(f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
>
>You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty. You are a lame flamer poser. An
>elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
>
Look up "pastiche" in a dictionary - ChildMolesteR.
-whoops-
Khaveen Abdul Ca-non
<the__phan...@my-deja.com> in <90g9js$unb$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> in
alt.flame wrote:
>There Be No Shelter Here for tr...@hell-flame-wars.orgy:
>> Sure as fuck that is lam<BONK>
>
>Shuddup. I wudn't twawkin' tuh yoo.
Careful, you may irritate that nerve I hit more Panty.
>
>> Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
>> lames against Hannigan.
>
>What other PHANTOM MENACE could it be, FAT LAMER?
The PHANTOM MENACE who uses Pedo Lames, that is the lame assed one the
current discussion is about.
>> Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
>> (f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
>
>Will you EVER forgive me, CHILD RAPER?
I don't know if I can bring myself to do it
>> You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty.
>
>Ohhh yesIam.
Umm...no, you are an immodest star wars gink with delusions of
grandeur. Now go back to playing with your Cewbacca action figure.
>> You are a lame flamer poser.
>
>Define NON-POSING flamer, Crabby-keen.
A NON-POSING flamer is the diametric opposite of a lame flamer poser.
>> An elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
>
>What a FINE mess your lip's in, MINI-BULLIS.
Ahh, straighten your head out Peat Staplehead wannabe.
>
>> >> > e-maculate
>> >>
>> >> Fuckwit.
>> >
>> >Porndog.
>>
>> Pedo (F)lamer
>
>TOT TEASER.
>
Weakling flame boi.
Adrian Smith
The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> Adrian Smith: The crux of the biscuit is thusly; that the
> aforementioned spankee, albeit APPEARING to suffer an apropos
> comeuppance...
The words are too big, get a dictionary, kid. You can get ones with
pictures if you're just starting out. Apropos isn't an adjective. The
Claims o' Stain are such as to require a certain precision in their
dissection. Sorry if that gives you grief.
Still, balloo seems to rate you, so maybe you've got potential in areas
other than straight parody.
Show me some tricks.
--
Adrian Smith
Khaveen Abdul Ca-non
<8kun2tgh42me7pv84...@4ax.com> in alt.flame wrote:
>Khaveen Abdul Ca-non wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Dec 2000 03:36:19 GMT, The Phantom Menace
>><the__phan...@my-deja.com> in <90cf3j$8h3$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> in
>>alt.fan.hell-flame-wars wrote:
>
>>>
>>>Suren hell wudn't *YOU* either, DOWNLOADER OF CHILD PRON.
>>
>>Sure as fuck that is lame.
>>
>>Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
>>lames against Hannigan. Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
>>(f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
>>
>>You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty. You are a lame flamer poser. An
>>elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
>>
>
>Look up "pastiche" in a dictionary - ChildMolesteR.
Ahhh...so if dumbass A does it, and calls it art, then dumbass B does
it, it is art imitating art.
And that makes it OK.
Why don't you guys go back to homo lames, at least those were
interesting and inventive.
Dan Nelson
>
> 'The Artist Formerly Known As' is a reference to Prince, who did it
> because he was pissed off with his record company. Nothing to do with
> artistic pretensions. It's a 'cliche', y'know? One which shows
> considerably more sign of having gone convincingly over your head than
> your Shakespeare shite did of going over Howard's. Shame it wasn't a
> film reference.
"MegaSwoosh", IOW.
[...]
> conscience balloo and I will, in Howard's terms, continue to use you
> like a five-dollar whore, occasionally exchanging ends for the sake of
> variety and inviting passers-by to avail themselves of whatever orifice
> we don't happen to be employing at the time. It'll all be doubtless
> quite sociable, but if I were you I'd be asking myself what effect it
> might be having on my long-term marriage prospects. Metaphorically
> speaking.
I think TT would have said that in half the text. But your version
*does* strangely recall his style, somehow.
I'm surprised Stain is still posting. I thought he would have plonked
everyone on Usenet by now, the rate he was going.
the_mighty_balloo
> Q. E. D.
"Quod erat demonstrandum?"
Don't you have to provide a proof before you can
claim "thus it is proven?"
--
coochie coo
Benjamin D. Capoeman mhm15x1
c@poeman{at}homedotcom
Adrian Smith
b...@lloo.at.REMOVEpenis.dot.com (the_mighty_balloo) wrote:
> Avoid reallife situations. escribió en artículo:
>
> > Q. E. D.
>
> "Quod erat demonstrandum?"
>
> Don't you have to provide a proof before you can
> claim "thus it is proven?"
That's 'proof by omission'. I omitted to guess what Stain was actually
up to in his spare time - groundbreaking work in teledildonics,
probably - and that means I lack imagination. Or something.
Menjy
>>>The Phantom Menace wrote:
>>>>Suren hell wudn't *YOU* either, DOWNLOADER OF CHILD PRON.
>>>
>>>Sure as fuck that is lame.
>>>
>>>Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
>>>lames against Hannigan. Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
>>>(f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
>>>
>>>You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty. You are a lame flamer poser. An
>>>elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
>>>
>>Look up "pastiche" in a dictionary - ChildMolesteR.
>
>Ahhh...so if dumbass A does it, and calls it art, then dumbass B does
>it, it is art imitating art.
>
>And that makes it OK.
>
>Why don't you guys go back to homo lames, at least those were
>interesting and inventive.
Shut up - HoMo.
--
Flamer to the Gentry -- Prof. IACW -- mhm 20x8 -- "ludus non nisi sanguineus"
http://iacw.usenet-performance-art.org/ (updated 7th June '00)
The Phantom Menace
> In article <90guc2$hik$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > Adrian Smith: The crux of the biscuit is thusly; that the
> > aforementioned spankee, albeit APPEARING to suffer an apropos
> > comeuppance...
>
> The words are too big, get a dictionary, kid.
I didn't mean to infer that I habitually grammar-check your bullshit
(or mine, for that matter), so let some air outta that head. I might
as well have written your lines in Swahili for all the relevance some
long-winded Iron Age spat between you and Stain holds in the *coming*
century.
> You can get ones with pictures if you're just starting out. Apropos
> isn't an adjective.
> The Claims o' Stain are such as to require a certain precision in
> their dissection. Sorry if that gives you grief.
I'll keep that in mind next time I'm portraying you as a mutant species
of Wallyus Coxus.
> Still, balloo seems to rate you, so maybe you've got potential in
> areas other than straight parody.
[toys with fingerbone/button on trench-coat made of human scalps] Who
knows?
> Show me some tricks.
I don't hit guys with glasses, kid. They eventually retreat into their
dens filled with shitty woodland-scenery paintings and Carpenters
albums, all the while wondering why ma never let them play with real
children.
e-male
--
"I am not on AOL (read the headers,newbie), and *I* *am* *in*
*the* *flonk*"
"AOL really helps with anonymous trolling."
"How can an ISP make someone so pissed off?? You really have issues."
- Poor, poor Cock Rocket. (Ref:
<3a27ab05...@news.earthlink.net>)
The Phantom Menace
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2000 14:27:15 GMT, The Phantom Menace
> <the__phan...@my-deja.com> in <90g9js$unb$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> in
> alt.flame wrote:
>
> >There Be No Shelter Here for tr...@hell-flame-wars.orgy:
> >
> >Shuddup. I wudn't twawkin' tuh yoo.
>
> Careful, you may irritate that nerve I hit more Panty.
In English please.
> >> Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
> >> lames against Hannigan.
> >
> >What other PHANTOM MENACE could it be, FAT LAMER?
>
> The PHANTOM MENACE who uses Pedo Lames, that is the lame assed one the
> current discussion is about.
Why would I want to discuss that with you, KINDERGARDEN SKULKER?
> >> Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
> >> (f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
> >
> >Will you EVER forgive me, CHILD RAPER?
>
> I don't know if I can bring myself to do it
Try harder then; I know you're at least capable of downloading CHILD
PORN.
> >> You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty.
> >
> >Ohhh yesIam.
>
> Umm...no, you are an immodest star wars gink with delusions of
> grandeur. Now go back to playing with your Cewbacca action figure.
The new POTF one with the Dejarik chessboard or the '97 Bousch's Bounty?
> >> You are a lame flamer poser.
> >
> >Define NON-POSING flamer, Crabby-keen.
>
> A NON-POSING flamer is the diametric opposite of a lame flam<BAT>
So you don't know. Good one, UNDEROO INSPECTOR.
> >> An elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
> >
> >What a FINE mess your lip's in, MINI-BULLIS.
>
> Ahh, straighten your head out Peat Staplehead wannabe.
Let me guess: some KotM candidate who's keeping fifty people in a
messy fucking tizzy, eh, BOY BUTTBLASTER?
> >> >> > e-maculate
> >> >>
> >> >> Fuckwit.
> >> >
> >> >Porndog.
> >>
> >> Pedo (F)lamer
> >
> >TOT TEASER.
>
> Weakling flame boi.
PEDOPHILE.
e-galitarian
Khaveen Abdul Ca-non
provided proof of it's gullibility when it put this crap
<oj9p2tc7qt9jm1qq0...@4ax.com> in the cesspool known as
alt.hackers.malicious:
>Khaveen Abdul Ca-non wrote:
>>whoops <wwwh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>>Khaveen Abdul Ca-non wrote:
>>>>The Phantom Menace wrote:
>
>>>>>Suren hell wudn't *YOU* either, DOWNLOADER OF CHILD PRON.
>>>>
>>>>Sure as fuck that is lame.
>>>>
>>>>Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
>>>>lames against Hannigan. Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
>>>>(f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
>>>>
>>>>You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty. You are a lame flamer poser. An
>>>>elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
>>>>
>>>Look up "pastiche" in a dictionary - ChildMolesteR.
>>
>>Ahhh...so if dumbass A does it, and calls it art, then dumbass B does
>>it, it is art imitating art.
>>
>>And that makes it OK.
>>
>>Why don't you guys go back to homo lames, at least those were
>>interesting and inventive.
>
>Shut up - HoMo.
Thank you - FaGGot.
--
K. A. Cannon
Usenet Miscreant
khaveen at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)
http://www.lowdown.com/~kc217/main.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~Khaveen/index.html
Kevin is a damn communist! - Piddy, 01 May 2000
By the Imperial Grace of Emperor James of APDD
I have been d00dsignated.
Official d00dsignatoin #f4r75n1ff3r.
___________________________________________
`Wer mit Ungeheuern kampft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheur wird.'
`He who fights with monsters must take care that he does not become a monster.'
- Nietzsche
______________________
In Message-ID: <2kkl0tcmc91v8dtv0...@4ax.com>, Optional Identity gives up the deal on Fat ass:
"Judging by the content of his posts in the Burnore threads, he is a very boring obsessed little
man."
whoops
>On Mon, 04 Dec 2000 20:12:18 +0000, whoops <wwwh...@my-deja.com> in
><8kun2tgh42me7pv84...@4ax.com> in alt.flame wrote:
>
>>Khaveen Abdul Ca-non wrote:
>>>
>>>You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty. You are a lame flamer poser. An
>>>elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
>>>
>>
>>Look up "pastiche" in a dictionary - ChildMolesteR.
>
>Ahhh...so if dumbass A does it, and calls it art, then dumbass B does
>it, it is art imitating art.
You got it - BabyPumper.
>And that makes it OK.
Sure does - TotAnnoyerR.
>Why don't you guys go back to homo lames, at least those were
>interesting and inventive.
As you wish, RumpRangeR.
-whoops-
The Phantom Menace
> It, the it in this case being, 'Menjy' <me...@SPAMBLOCKdatabasix.com>,
> provided proof of it's gullibility when it put this crap
> <oj9p2tc7qt9jm1qq0...@4ax.com> in the cesspool known as
> alt.hackers.malicious:
>
> >Khaveen Abdul Ca-non wrote:
> >
> >>>>>Suren hell wudn't *YOU* either, DOWNLOADER OF CHILD PRON.
> >>>>
> >>>>Sure as fuck that is lame.
> >>>>
> >>>>Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
> >>>>lames against Hannigan. Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
> >>>>(f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
> >>>>
> >>>>You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty. You are a lame flamer
poser. An
> >>>>elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
> >>>>
> >>
> >>Ahhh...so if dumbass A does it, and calls it art, then dumbass B
does
> >>it, it is art imitating art.
> >>
> >>
> >>interesting and inventive.
> >
>
> Thank you - FaGGot.
Wow, the PEDO has graduated to FAG LAMES.-DiaperDiveR.
e-volve
--
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized
nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our
police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the
future."
- Adolph Hitler, 1935
Adrian Smith
> > > aforementioned spankee, albeit APPEARING to suffer an apropos
> > > comeuppance...
> >
> > The words are too big, get a dictionary, kid.
>
> I didn't mean to infer that I habitually grammar-check your bullshit
> (or mine, for that matter),
Imply. So I see.
> so let some air outta that head.
> I might as well have written your lines in Swahili
> for all the relevance some long-winded Iron
> Age spat between you and Stain holds in the *coming* century.
Relevance on a.f. Heh. You think you can get more amusing parodies by
writing in Swahili, by no means let me stand in your way. I take it you
see the *coming* century on a.f as being ruled by fearless sons of fun
such as yourself? *Such* a lot to look forward to. But I have to say
that I think it's probably time Stain retired. He's been here too long,
got a little stale. Leave it to me. And don't knock extended prose
until you've found out if you can do it or not.
> > You can get ones with pictures if you're just starting out.
> > Apropos isn't an adjective.
> > The Claims o' Stain are such as to require a certain precision in
> > their dissection. Sorry if that gives you grief.
>
> I'll keep that in mind next time I'm portraying you as a mutant
> species of Wallyus Coxus.
Keep what in mind? Precision? Go for it, carefully at first. Portrayals
are all very well, but they have to be pretty good to sting.
I guess we'll have to look forward to that as well.
> > Still, balloo seems to rate you, so maybe you've got potential in
> > areas other than straight parody.
>
> [toys with fingerbone/button on trench-coat made of human scalps] Who
> knows?
Atmosphere is good, but the reason for balloo's enthusiasm is proving
elusive. It could have been a slow year, I suppose.
> > Show me some tricks.
>
> I don't hit guys with glasses, kid.
The guys without glasses seem to be getting off pretty lightly as well.
False-froging and one-line namecalling are pretty much all I can see.
So this is the future. Fanfuckingtastic.
> They eventually retreat into their dens filled with shitty
> woodland-scenery paintings and Carpenters albums, all the while
> wondering why ma never let them play with real children.
Real children (though not quite as real as balloo's) are a lot to do
with why I don't spend so much time in a.f these days, AAMOF.
> e-male
No substitute for the genuine article, as a rule. E-masculate might be
what you're looking for. Mind your fingers.
--
Adrian Smith
Khaveen Abdul Ca-non
<the__phan...@my-deja.com>, provided proof of it's gullibility
when it put this crap <90j11g$5pf$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> in the cesspool
known as alt.usenet.kooks:
>There Be No Shelter Here for kha...@insurgent.orgy:
>> It, the it in this case being, 'Menjy' <me...@SPAMBLOCKdatabasix.com>,
>> provided proof of it's gullibility when it put this crap
>> <oj9p2tc7qt9jm1qq0...@4ax.com> in the cesspool known as
>> alt.hackers.malicious:
>>
>> >Khaveen Abdul Ca-non wrote:
>> >>whoops <wwwh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> >>>Khaveen Abdul Ca-non wrote:
>> >>>>The Phantom Menace wrote:
>> >
>> >>>>>Suren hell wudn't *YOU* either, DOWNLOADER OF CHILD PRON.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Sure as fuck that is lame.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Isn't this the same Phantom Menace who chided me about using *fat*
>> >>>>lames against Hannigan. Now you use the most fucked up lame assed
>> >>>>(f)lame of all. A Pedo lame.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>You aint no elite flamer dude Phanty. You are a lame flamer
>poser. An
>> >>>>elite flamer dude would never play a Pedo lame.
>> >>>>
>> >>>Look up "pastiche" in a dictionary - ChildMolesteR.
>> >>
>> >>Ahhh...so if dumbass A does it, and calls it art, then dumbass B
>does
>> >>it, it is art imitating art.
>> >>
>> >>And that makes it OK.
>> >>
>> >>Why don't you guys go back to homo lames, at least those were
>> >>interesting and inventive.
>> >
>> >Shut up - HoMo.
>>
>> Thank you - FaGGot.
>
>Wow, the PEDO has graduated to FAG LAMES.-DiaperDiveR.
You seem to be under the impression that I will fall into that trap,
right PlaySkooL PoliticiaN.
opps.
>e-volve
e-mote
--
K. A. Cannon
Usenet Miscreant
khaveen at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)
http://www.lowdown.com/~kc217/main.html
The Phantom Menace
> In article <90isgp$1m5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > There Be No Shelter Here for Adrian Smith:
> > > In article <90guc2$hik$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > > The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > > Adrian Smith: The crux of the biscuit is thusly; that the
> > > > aforementioned spankee, albeit APPEARING to suffer an apropos
> > > > comeuppance...
> > >
> > > The words are too big, get a dictionary, kid.
> >
> > I didn't mean to infer that I habitually grammar-check your bullshit
> > (or mine, for that matter),
>
> Imply. So I see.
See what? Do you play anything besides grammar laming, Adrian?
> > so let some air outta that head.
> > I might as well have written your lines in Swahili
> > for all the relevance some long-winded Iron
> > Age spat between you and Stain holds in the *coming* century.
>
> Relevance on a.f. Heh.
Or anyplace else. That better, doc?
> You think you can get more amusing parodies by
> writing in Swahili, by no means let me stand in your way.
You don't.
> I take it you see the *coming* century on a.f as being ruled by
> fearless sons of fun such as yourself? *Such* a lot to look forward
> to.
What are you babbling about, Adrian? Do you have an old crusty grudge
against some organization called 'Fearless Sons of Fun', or is this
your figurative way of pissing on some innocuous little tract of a.f
swampland that caught your eye in the hope that said 'fearless sons of
fun' will give it a wide berth and allow you to keep your lunch money?
> But I have to say that I think it's probably time Stain retired.
I dunno, talking to you has made me change my take on that. Now I hope
he stays.
> He's been here too long, got a little stale. Leave it to me.
Leave it to you and the fearless sons of fun to write 5,000 word essays
on why they weren't spanked at some point?
I mean, from what I've read in this thread, it sounded like you got
spanked more or less recently. Was that what happened, in one word or
less?
> And don't knock extended prose until you've found out if you can
> do it or not.
Ahem. Do re mi fa soooo....
Fuck extended prose.
Now what, kid?
> > > You can get ones with pictures if you're just starting out.
> > > Apropos isn't an adjective.
> > > The Claims o' Stain are such as to require a certain precision in
> > > their dissection. Sorry if that gives you grief.
> >
> > I'll keep that in mind next time I'm portraying you as a mutant
> > species of Wallyus Coxus.
>
> Keep what in mind? Precision? Go for it, carefully at first.
> Portrayals are all very well, but they have to be pretty good to
> sting.
[looks around] You're the only one who felt a need to comment on it.
Are you sure you weren't stung, just a teensy bit?
> I guess we'll have to look forward to that as well.
Who's 'we'? You don't have to look forward to anything you don't want
to, of course.
> > > Still, balloo seems to rate you, so maybe you've got potential in
> > > areas other than straight parody.
> >
> > [toys with fingerbone/button on trench-coat made of human scalps]
Who
> > knows?
>
> Atmosphere is good, but the reason for balloo's enthusiasm is proving
> elusive. It could have been a slow year, I suppose.
Maybe he was trying to bust the gazooms of a bunch of other guys.
What's your final answer?
> > > Show me some tricks.
> >
> > I don't hit guys with glasses, kid.
>
> The guys without glasses seem to be getting off pretty lightly as
> well.
> False-froging and one-line namecalling are pretty much all I can see.
Then maybe you should become one of my faithful Gentle Readers, Adrian.
> So this is the future. Fanfuckingtastic.
Span...
> > They eventually retreat into their dens filled with shitty
> > woodland-scenery paintings and Carpenters albums, all the while
> > wondering why ma never let them play with real children.
>
> Real children (though not quite as real as balloo's) are a lot to do
> with why I don't spend so much time in a.f these days, AAMOF.
Nice talking to you, Adrian.
> > e-male
>
> No substitute for the genuine article, as a rule. E-masculate might be
> what you're looking for. Mind your fingers.
It was...
Never mind. Hurry off then, Adrian.
e-gregious
--
"I am not on AOL (read the headers,newbie), and *I* *am* *in*
*the* *flonk*"
"AOL really helps with anonymous trolling."
"How can an ISP make someone so pissed off?? You really have issues."
- Poor, poor Cock Rocket. (Ref:
<3a27ab05...@news.earthlink.net>)
Adrian Smith
The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> There Be No Shelter Here for Adrian Smith:
> > In article <90isgp$1m5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > There Be No Shelter Here for Adrian Smith:
> > > > In article <90guc2$hik$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > > > The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > > > Adrian Smith: The crux of the biscuit is thusly; that the
> > > > > aforementioned spankee, albeit APPEARING to suffer an apropos
> > > > > comeuppance...
> > > >
> > > > The words are too big, get a dictionary, kid.
> > >
> > > I didn't mean to infer that I habitually grammar-check your
> > > bullshit (or mine, for that matter),
> >
> > Imply. So I see.
>
> See what? Do you play anything besides grammar laming, Adrian?
Not grammar. Vocabulary. Next time, you'll know the right word. My
generous nature.
> > > so let some air outta that head.
> > > I might as well have written your lines in Swahili
> > > for all the relevance some long-winded Iron
> > > Age spat between you and Stain holds in the *coming* century.
> >
> > Relevance on a.f. Heh.
>
> Or anyplace else. That better, doc?
To someone someplace else, maybe. It's relevant to me. You can either
ignore it or find some more oblique way of showing how irrelevant it is
to you.
> > You think you can get more amusing parodies by
> > writing in Swahili, by no means let me stand in your way.
>
> You don't.
But I don't get my Swahili parody, do I? If you can't remember the
beginning of a sentence by the time you get to the end, you might want
to have the Ritalin levels adjusted.
> > I take it you see the *coming* century on a.f as being ruled by
> > fearless sons of fun such as yourself? *Such* a lot to look forward
> > to.
>
> What are you babbling about, Adrian? Do you have an old crusty grudge
> against some organization called 'Fearless Sons of Fun', or is this
> your figurative way of pissing on some innocuous little tract of a.f
> swampland that caught your eye in the hope that said 'fearless sons of
> fun' will give it a wide berth and allow you to keep your lunch money?
Neither, remarkably. Just that a.f seems as full of wankers as ever,
none of whom appear to be much of a threat to my lunch money at all.
> > But I have to say that I think it's probably time Stain retired.
>
> I dunno, talking to you has made me change my take on that. Now I
> hope he stays.
He's probably got a lot to teach you, actually. He could take you under
his wing, guide you away from the *really* lame comebacks...
Perhaps I'm being too hard on the guy.
> > He's been here too long, got a little stale. Leave it to me.
>
> Leave it to you and the fearless sons of fun to write 5,000 word
> essays on why they weren't spanked at some point?
> I mean, from what I've read in this thread, it sounded like you got
> spanked more or less recently. Was that what happened, in one word or
> less?
No.
> > And don't knock extended prose until you've found out if you can
> > do it or not.
>
> Ahem. Do re mi fa soooo....
> Fuck extended prose.
> Now what, kid?
Well, it's the main means of providing evidence for extended thought,
so as long as you have no need for that in your life you should get
along just fine.
> > > > You can get ones with pictures if you're just starting out.
> > > > Apropos isn't an adjective.
> > > > The Claims o' Stain are such as to require a certain precision
> > > > in their dissection. Sorry if that gives you grief.
> > >
> > > I'll keep that in mind next time I'm portraying you as a mutant
> > > species of Wallyus Coxus.
> >
> > Keep what in mind? Precision? Go for it, carefully at first.
> > Portrayals are all very well, but they have to be pretty good to
> > sting.
>
> [looks around] You're the only one who felt a need to comment on it.
> Are you sure you weren't stung, just a teensy bit?
This is alt dot flame, with a side order of the flonk to go. You make
some pisspoor remark about me, I turn my attention to you, and you
think that proves I'm stung by it?
How long have you been here exactly?
> > I guess we'll have to look forward to that as well.
>
> Who's 'we'? You don't have to look forward to
> anything you don't want to, of course.
We - that's you and me - can look forward to an amusing portrayal of
me, by you. Sometime in the *coming* century, with any luck.
Unless you've been oversold, of course.
> > > > Still, balloo seems to rate you, so maybe you've got potential
> > > > in areas other than straight parody.
> > >
> > > [toys with fingerbone/button on trench-coat made of human scalps]
> > > Who knows?
> >
> > Atmosphere is good, but the reason for balloo's enthusiasm is
> > proving elusive. It could have been a slow year, I suppose.
>
> Maybe he was trying to bust the gazooms of a bunch of other guys.
This is possible, true.
> What's your final answer?
To which question? 'Who knows?' Thought that was rhetorical.
> > > > Show me some tricks.
> > >
> > > I don't hit guys with glasses, kid.
> >
> > The guys without glasses seem to be getting off pretty lightly as
> > well. False-froging and one-line namecalling are pretty much all I
> > can see.
>
> Then maybe you should become one of my faithful Gentle Readers,
> Adrian.
Pressure o' time, alas.
> > So this is the future. Fanfuckingtastic.
>
> Span...
...ish Fly? ...k my monkey? ...dex was ill-advised?
Whatever, kid.
> > > They eventually retreat into their dens filled with shitty
> > > woodland-scenery paintings and Carpenters albums, all the while
> > > wondering why ma never let them play with real children.
> >
> > Real children (though not quite as real as balloo's) are a lot to do
> > with why I don't spend so much time in a.f these days, AAMOF.
>
> Nice talking to you, Adrian.
You needn't leave. It'll take me a while to get through to Jack.
> > > e-male
> >
> > No substitute for the genuine article, as a rule. E-masculate might
> > be what you're looking for. Mind your fingers.
>
> It was...
> Never mind. Hurry off then, Adrian.
Got stuff to do here, kid. Sorry.
--
Adrian Smith
Nostrildamus
<by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>Nostrils <Nostr...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000 03:36:39 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
>> <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>>>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
>>>> <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>>>> Troll.
>>>
>>> No.
>
>> Sequestered?
>
> Not really.
Loony bin?
>> Big Daddy Zues, Stock Picking Genius.
>
> Huh?
Ooops. I HATE when that happens.
--
Nostrildamus, Methuselah Of Usenet
~~~ Dean, Academy of Poetic Prognostication, Bungmunch University ~~~~
"SEMPER MEOVAMVS AD INFINITVM ET INFINITVM"
~~~~~~~~ CASHP #31-97 ~~~~~~~ Bellower #21 ~~~~~~ mhm 4x8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Phantom Menace
> In article <90jjbe$mjr$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > There Be No Shelter Here for Adrian Smith:
> > > In article <90isgp$1m5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > > The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > > There Be No Shelter Here for Adrian Smith:
> > > > > In article <90guc2$hik$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > > > > The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Adrian Smith: The crux of the biscuit is thusly; that the
> > > > > > aforementioned spankee, albeit APPEARING to suffer an
apropos
> > > > > > comeuppance...
> > > > >
> > > > > The words are too big, get a dictionary, kid.
> > > >
> > > > I didn't mean to infer that I habitually grammar-check your
> > > > bullshit (or mine, for that matter),
> > >
> > > Imply. So I see.
> >
> > See what? Do you play anything besides grammar laming, Adrian?
>
> Not grammar. Vocabulary. Next time, you'll know the right word. My
> generous nature.
Get over yourself, four-eyes. I've seen much better litfobs than you
duke it out using their tattered OEDs. Redline the fucker and let
loose with something mildly passionate, willya?
> > > > so let some air outta that head.
> > > > I might as well have written your lines in Swahili
> > > > for all the relevance some long-winded Iron
> > > > Age spat between you and Stain holds in the *coming* century.
> > >
> > > Relevance on a.f. Heh.
> >
> > Or anyplace else. That better, doc?
>
> To someone someplace else, maybe. It's relevant to me. You can either
> ignore it or find some more oblique way of showing how irrelevant it
> is to you.
Howzabout I just keep doing whatever I want whenever and wherever I
want?
> > > You think you can get more amusing parodies by
> > > writing in Swahili, by no means let me stand in your way.
> >
> > You don't.
>
> But I don't get my Swahili parody, do I?
Nice try, Buffalo Bob.
> If you can't remember the beginning of a sentence by the time you
> get to the end, you might want to have the Ritalin levels adjusted.
[irritating nasal voice] "If you can't remember the beginning of a
sentence by the time you get to the end, you might want to have the
Ritalin levels adjusted."
And YOU'RE complaining about content, you blubber-bellied
attitudinarian?
> > > I take it you see the *coming* century on a.f as being ruled by
> > > fearless sons of fun such as yourself? *Such* a lot to look
forward
> > > to.
> >
> > What are you babbling about, Adrian? Do you have an old crusty
grudge
> > against some organization called 'Fearless Sons of Fun', or is this
> > your figurative way of pissing on some innocuous little tract of a.f
> > swampland that caught your eye in the hope that said 'fearless sons
of
> > fun' will give it a wide berth and allow you to keep your lunch
money?
>
> Neither, remarkably. Just that a.f seems as full of wankers as ever,
> none of whom appear to be much of a threat to my lunch money at all.
Well, if the Fearless Sons of Fun are keeping you annoyed they're good
for something.
> > > But I have to say that I think it's probably time Stain retired.
> >
> > I dunno, talking to you has made me change my take on that. Now I
> > hope he stays.
>
> He's probably got a lot to teach you, actually. He could take you
> under his wing, guide you away from the *really* lame comebacks...
I hereby change my mind again.
> Perhaps I'm being too hard on the guy.
"Smithesque tyranny" is an oxymoron.
> > > He's been here too long, got a little stale. Leave it to me.
> >
> > Leave it to you and the fearless sons of fun to write 5,000 word
> > essays on why they weren't spanked at some point?
> > I mean, from what I've read in this thread, it sounded like you got
> > spanked more or less recently. Was that what happened, in one word
or
> > less?
>
> No.
Then why does Stain appear to think you were?
> > > And don't knock extended prose until you've found out if you can
> > > do it or not.
> >
> > Ahem. Do re mi fa soooo....
> > Fuck extended prose.
> > Now what, kid?
>
> Well, it's the main means of providing evidence for extended thought,
> so as long as you have no need for that in your life you should get
> along just fine.
Who needs to plot out strategy if he shoots laserbeams in all
directions?
> > > > > You can get ones with pictures if you're just starting out.
> > > > > Apropos isn't an adjective.
> > > > > The Claims o' Stain are such as to require a certain precision
> > > > > in their dissection. Sorry if that gives you grief.
> > > >
> > > > I'll keep that in mind next time I'm portraying you as a mutant
> > > > species of Wallyus Coxus.
> > >
> > > Keep what in mind? Precision? Go for it, carefully at first.
> > > Portrayals are all very well, but they have to be pretty good to
> > > sting.
> >
> > [looks around] You're the only one who felt a need to comment on it.
> > Are you sure you weren't stung, just a teensy bit?
>
> This is alt dot flame, with a side order of the flonk to go. You make
> some pisspoor remark about me, I turn my attention to you, and you
> think that proves I'm stung by it?
No, it proves you're a masochist, Adrian.
> How long have you been here exactly?
A week. What's that got to do with anything, meatpile?
> > > I guess we'll have to look forward to that as well.
> >
> > Who's 'we'? You don't have to look forward to
> > anything you don't want to, of course.
>
> We - that's you and me - can look forward to an amusing portrayal of
> me, by you. Sometime in the *coming* century, with any luck.
What's amusing about roadkill?
> Unless you've been oversold, of course.
Who isn't? How long have you been here exactly?
> > > > > Still, balloo seems to rate you, so maybe you've got potential
> > > > > in areas other than straight parody.
> > > >
> > > > [toys with fingerbone/button on trench-coat made of human
scalps]
> > > > Who knows?
> > >
> > > Atmosphere is good, but the reason for balloo's enthusiasm is
> > > proving elusive. It could have been a slow year, I suppose.
> >
> > Maybe he was trying to bust the gazooms of a bunch of other guys.
>
> This is possible, true.
And you couldn't cook up that one yourself?
> > What's your final answer?
>
> To which question?
What do you think Balloo was thinking when he rated me, analyst of
Balloo?
> 'Who knows?' Thought that was rhetorical.
"Baaaackpedal..."
> > > > > Show me some tricks.
> > > >
> > > > I don't hit guys with glasses, kid.
> > >
> > > The guys without glasses seem to be getting off pretty lightly as
> > > well. False-froging and one-line namecalling are pretty much all I
> > > can see.
> >
> > Then maybe you should become one of my faithful Gentle Readers,
> > Adrian.
>
> Pressure o' time, alas.
That's a shame.
> > > So this is the future. Fanfuckingtastic.
> >
> > Span...
>
> ...ish Fly? ...k my monkey? ...dex was ill-advised?
>
> Whatever, kid.
You sound a little sad.
> > > > They eventually retreat into their dens filled with shitty
> > > > woodland-scenery paintings and Carpenters albums, all the while
> > > > wondering why ma never let them play with real children.
> > >
> > > Real children (though not quite as real as balloo's) are a lot to
do
> > > with why I don't spend so much time in a.f these days, AAMOF.
> >
> > Nice talking to you, Adrian.
>
> You needn't leave. It'll take me a while to get through to Jack.
You gonna top 34K? I can't wait.
> > > > e-male
> > >
> > > No substitute for the genuine article, as a rule. E-masculate
might
> > > be what you're looking for. Mind your fingers.
> >
> > It was...
> > Never mind. Hurry off then, Adrian.
>
> Got stuff to do here, kid. Sorry.
Like what? You don't have time to read MY posts, but you have time to
try convincing Stain you weren't spanked? How much of a 'whatever' was
that 'whatever', laddie?
e-go
--
"I am not on AOL (read the headers,newbie), and *I* *am* *in*
*the* *flonk*"
"AOL really helps with anonymous trolling."
"How can an ISP make someone so pissed off?? You really have issues."
- Poor, poor Cock Rocket. (Ref:
<3a27ab05...@news.earthlink.net>)
Adrian Smith
The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> There Be No Shelter Here for Adrian Smith:
> > In article <90jjbe$mjr$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > There Be No Shelter Here for Adrian Smith:
> > > > In article <90isgp$1m5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > > > The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > > > There Be No Shelter Here for Adrian Smith:
> > > > > > In article <90guc2$hik$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > > > > > The Phantom Menace <the__phan...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > Adrian Smith: The crux of the biscuit is thusly; that
> > > > > > > the aforementioned spankee, albeit APPEARING to suffer an
> > > > > > > apropos comeuppance...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The words are too big, get a dictionary, kid.
> > > > >
> > > > > I didn't mean to infer that I habitually grammar-check your
> > > > > bullshit (or mine, for that matter),
> > > >
> > > > Imply. So I see.
> > >
> > > See what? Do you play anything besides grammar laming, Adrian?
> >
> > Not grammar. Vocabulary. Next time, you'll know the right word. My
> > generous nature.
>
> Get over yourself, four-eyes. I've seen much better litfobs than you
> duke it out using their tattered OEDs. Redline the fucker and let
> loose with something mildly passionate, willya?
Well, we all save our passion for different things, kid. It ain't
always expressed in UPPERCASE, either.
> > > > > so let some air outta that head.
> > > > > I might as well have written your lines in Swahili
> > > > > for all the relevance some long-winded Iron
> > > > > Age spat between you and Stain holds in the *coming* century.
> > > >
> > > > Relevance on a.f. Heh.
> > >
> > > Or anyplace else. That better, doc?
> >
> > To someone someplace else, maybe. It's relevant to me. You can
> > either ignore it or find some more oblique way of showing how
> > irrelevant it is to you.
>
> Howzabout I just keep doing whatever I want whenever and wherever I
> want?
Like I said. You have indeed mastered the workings of unmoderated
groups. And after only a week.
Perhaps balloo was onto something after all.
> > > > You think you can get more amusing parodies by
> > > > writing in Swahili, by no means let me stand in your way.
> > >
> > > You don't.
> >
> > But I don't get my Swahili parody, do I?
>
> Nice try, Buffalo Bob.
>
> > If you can't remember the beginning of a sentence by the time you
> > get to the end, you might want to have the Ritalin levels adjusted.
>
> [irritating nasal voice] "If you can't remember the beginning of a
> sentence by the time you get to the end, you might want to have the
> Ritalin levels adjusted."
> And YOU'RE complaining about content, you blubber-bellied
> attitudinarian?
I'm complaining about flame comebacks older than you appear to be,
spunklet. More advanced than putting 'So I notice.' after 'I don't
think...', but not much.
Content is a problem, seeing as we've just met. We ain't going to have
a huge amount to discuss at first. So we end up going for each other's
style, which is a bit of a dead end.
This is one of the reasons I prefer more extended writing. YMWV.
> > > > I take it you see the *coming* century on a.f as being ruled by
> > > > fearless sons of fun such as yourself? *Such* a lot to look
> > > > forward to.
> > >
> > > What are you babbling about, Adrian? Do you have an old crusty
> > > grudge against some organization called 'Fearless Sons of Fun',
> > > or is this your figurative way of pissing on some innocuous
> > > little tract of a.f swampland that caught your eye in the hope
> > > that said 'fearless sons of fun' will give it a wide berth and
> > > allow you to keep your lunch money?
> >
> > Neither, remarkably. Just that a.f seems as full of wankers as ever,
> > none of whom appear to be much of a threat to my lunch money at all.
>
> Well, if the Fearless Sons of Fun are keeping you annoyed they're good
> for something.
Gotta have *something* to do while waiting for Stain to compose his
epics. OTOH, see above.
> > > > But I have to say that I think it's probably time Stain retired.
> > >
> > > I dunno, talking to you has made me change my take on that. Now I
> > > hope he stays.
> >
> > He's probably got a lot to teach you, actually. He could take you
> > under his wing, guide you away from the *really* lame comebacks...
>
> I hereby change my mind again.
No, look. An apprenticeship system could work wonders for the place. It
only hurts the first couple of times, apparently.
> > Perhaps I'm being too hard on the guy.
>
> "Smithesque tyranny" is an oxymoron.
Wait and see. If your attention span holds up.
> > > > He's been here too long, got a little stale. Leave it to me.
> > >
> > > Leave it to you and the fearless sons of fun to write 5,000 word
> > > essays on why they weren't spanked at some point?
> > > I mean, from what I've read in this thread, it sounded like you
> > > got spanked more or less recently. Was that what happened, in
> > > one word or less?
> >
> > No.
>
> Then why does Stain appear to think you were?
Because he's full of shit, as I'm here to demonstrate. Gotta warn ya,
though - more Large Posts are likely. He has archives you wouldn't
believe.
> > > > And don't knock extended prose until you've found out if you can
> > > > do it or not.
> > >
> > > Ahem. Do re mi fa soooo....
> > > Fuck extended prose.
> > > Now what, kid?
> >
> > Well, it's the main means of providing evidence for extended
> > thought, so as long as you have no need for that in your life you
> > should get along just fine.
>
> Who needs to plot out strategy if he shoots laserbeams in all
> directions?
Oh, *that's* what they are.
> > > > > > You can get ones with pictures if you're just starting out.
> > > > > > Apropos isn't an adjective.
> > > > > > The Claims o' Stain are such as to require a certain
> > > > > > precision in their dissection. Sorry if that gives you
> > > > > > grief.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll keep that in mind next time I'm portraying you as a
> > > > > mutant species of Wallyus Coxus.
> > > >
> > > > Keep what in mind? Precision? Go for it, carefully at first.
> > > > Portrayals are all very well, but they have to be pretty good to
> > > > sting.
> > >
> > > [looks around] You're the only one who felt a need to comment on
> > > it. Are you sure you weren't stung, just a teensy bit?
> >
> > This is alt dot flame, with a side order of the flonk to go. You
> > make some pisspoor remark about me, I turn my attention to you,
> > and you think that proves I'm stung by it?
>
> No, it proves you're a masochist, Adrian.
I'd be one fucking disappointed masochist if I came to *you* looking
for anything resembling chastisement. "Corrective Therapy from Madame
Phantom Menace - Namecalling a Speciality. No Refunds."
I don't think so.
> > How long have you been here exactly?
>
> A week. What's that got to do with anything, meatpile?
Just plotting a learning curve... Hmm.
> > > > I guess we'll have to look forward to that as well.
> > >
> > > Who's 'we'? You don't have to look forward to
> > > anything you don't want to, of course.
> >
> > We - that's you and me - can look forward to an amusing portrayal of
> > me, by you. Sometime in the *coming* century, with any luck.
>
> What's amusing about roadkill?
Ah. You're not up to it. There's a surprise.
It probably wouldn't have been that funny anyway.
> > Unless you've been oversold, of course.
>
> Who isn't?
Me.
> How long have you been here exactly?
A week, this time. Feels like longer.
> > > > > > Still, balloo seems to rate you, so maybe you've got
> > > > > > potential in areas other than straight parody.
> > > > > [toys with fingerbone/button on trench-coat made of human
> > > > > scalps] Who knows?
> > > >
> > > > Atmosphere is good, but the reason for balloo's enthusiasm is
> > > > proving elusive. It could have been a slow year, I suppose.
> > >
> > > Maybe he was trying to bust the gazooms of a bunch of other guys.
> >
> > This is possible, true.
>
> And you couldn't cook up that one yourself?
I didn't. No big deal.
> > > What's your final answer?
> >
> > To which question?
>
> What do you think Balloo was thinking when he rated me, analyst of
> Balloo?
Seems a little early for a final one.
> > 'Who knows?' Thought that was rhetorical.
>
> "Baaaackpedal..."
Wouldn't quote Stain if I were you.
> > > > > > Show me some tricks.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't hit guys with glasses, kid.
> > > >
> > > > The guys without glasses seem to be getting off pretty lightly
> > > > as well. False-froging and one-line namecalling are pretty much
> > > > all I can see.
> > >
> > > Then maybe you should become one of my faithful Gentle Readers,
> > > Adrian.
> >
> > Pressure o' time, alas.
>
> That's a shame.
>
> > > > So this is the future. Fanfuckingtastic.
> > >
> > > Span...
> >
> > ...ish Fly? ...k my monkey? ...dex was ill-advised?
> >
> > Whatever, kid.
>
> You sound a little sad.
Only a little. a.f does that to me. Digital acres of jiddering
stupidity, the sump that so many of the biggest wankers on Usenet seem
to sink down to eventually.
> > > > > They eventually retreat into their dens filled with shitty
> > > > > woodland-scenery paintings and Carpenters albums, all the
> > > > > while wondering why ma never let them play with real children.
> > > >
> > > > Real children (though not quite as real as balloo's) are a lot
> > > > to do with why I don't spend so much time in a.f these days,
> > > > AAMOF.
> > >
> > > Nice talking to you, Adrian.
> >
> > You needn't leave. It'll take me a while to get through to Jack.
>
> You gonna top 34K? I can't wait.
Hey, I cut his post by about two thirds replying to it.
> > > > > e-male
> > > >
> > > > No substitute for the genuine article, as a rule. E-masculate
> > > > might be what you're looking for. Mind your fingers.
> > >
> > > It was...
> > > Never mind. Hurry off then, Adrian.
> >
> > Got stuff to do here, kid. Sorry.
>
> Like what? You don't have time to read MY posts, but you have time to
> try convincing Stain you weren't spanked?
Stain and I have a history, and things to discuss of no interest to
you. Whether I was spanked or not is the least of his worries. Your
posts aren't the stupidest available here, but I see no indication that
we'd make entertaining dancing partners.
> How much of a 'whatever' was that 'whatever', laddie?
Enough.
--
Adrian Smith
The Phantom Menace
Heeyeh-heh-heh. What a fucked-up little pickle this is turning out to
be, eh Adrian? How often are you refreshing your newsreader, Menace
fan?
> > > > > > so let some air outta that head.
> > > > > > I might as well have written your lines in Swahili
> > > > > > for all the relevance some long-winded Iron
> > > > > > Age spat between you and Stain holds in the *coming*
century.
> > > > >
> > > > > Relevance on a.f. Heh.
> > > >
> > > > Or anyplace else. That better, doc?
> > >
> > > To someone someplace else, maybe. It's relevant to me. You can
> > > either ignore it or find some more oblique way of showing how
> > > irrelevant it is to you.
> >
> > Howzabout I just keep doing whatever I want whenever and wherever I
> > want?
>
> Like I said. You have indeed mastered the workings of unmoderated
> groups. And after only a week.
When will you? You gave me only two choices, despot.
> Perhaps balloo was onto something after all.
You mean the comment about how your and Stain's disappearances could be
interpreted identically?
[Gideon's Crossing, tonight on ABC. Bum bum buhh BUM.]
> > [irritating nasal voice] "If you can't remember the beginning of a
> > sentence by the time you get to the end, you might want to have the
> > Ritalin levels adjusted."
> > And YOU'RE complaining about content, you blubber-bellied
> > attitudinarian?
>
> I'm complaining about flame comebacks older than you appear to be,
> spunklet. More advanced than putting 'So I notice.' after 'I don't
> think...', but not much.
Don't blame ME for all these lameoids. If you don't like it, you can
KEEP your fucking PIKACHU *AND* your forty-dollar CHARIZARD and GET OUT
OF MY FUCKING HOUSE, NEVER TO RETURN.
> Content is a problem, seeing as we've just met. We ain't going to have
> a huge amount to discuss at first. So we end up going for each other's
> style, which is a bit of a dead end.
[turns paddle over and examines it absently] Any ideas?
> This is one of the reasons I prefer more extended writing.
> YMWV.
Well go ahead then. I think Stain's gone for good anyway.
> > > > > I take it you see the *coming* century on a.f as being ruled
by
> > > > > fearless sons of fun such as yourself? *Such* a lot to look
> > > > > forward to.
> > > >
> > > > What are you babbling about, Adrian? Do you have an old crusty
> > > > grudge against some organization called 'Fearless Sons of Fun',
> > > > or is this your figurative way of pissing on some innocuous
> > > > little tract of a.f swampland that caught your eye in the hope
> > > > that said 'fearless sons of fun' will give it a wide berth and
> > > > allow you to keep your lunch money?
> > >
> > > Neither, remarkably. Just that a.f seems as full of wankers as
ever,
> > > none of whom appear to be much of a threat to my lunch money at
all.
> >
> > Well, if the Fearless Sons of Fun are keeping you annoyed they're
good
> > for something.
>
> Gotta have *something* to do while waiting for Stain to compose his
> epics.
[checks watch] Gawd, if this downtime is any indication of what he's
planning as his next filibuster, he's going to have to .tar the thing
and send it Federal to admins of the world.
> OTOH, see above.
Right, right. Go on then, Tolstoy.
> > > > > But I have to say that I think it's probably time Stain
retired.
> > > >
> > > > I dunno, talking to you has made me change my take on that.
Now I
> > > > hope he stays.
> > >
> > > He's probably got a lot to teach you, actually. He could take you
> > > under his wing, guide you away from the *really* lame comebacks...
> >
> > I hereby change my mind again.
>
> No, look. An apprenticeship system could work wonders for the place.
> It only hurts the first couple of times, apparently.
There are unwritten rules. And NO, I'm not going to write them down.
> > > Perhaps I'm being too hard on the guy.
> >
> > "Smithesque tyranny" is an oxymoron.
>
> Wait and see. If your attention span holds up.
I wonder what Bill Safire is doing today.
> > > > > He's been here too long, got a little stale. Leave it to me.
> > > >
> > > > Leave it to you and the fearless sons of fun to write 5,000 word
> > > > essays on why they weren't spanked at some point?
> > > > I mean, from what I've read in this thread, it sounded like you
> > > > got spanked more or less recently. Was that what happened, in
> > > > one word or less?
> > >
> > > No.
> >
> > Then why does Stain appear to think you were?
>
> Because he's full of shit, as I'm here to demonstrate.
Yuh. Now. But where have you *been*, Ade?
> Gotta warn ya, though - more Large Posts are likely. He has archives
> you wouldn't believe.
And so.
> > > > > And don't knock extended prose until you've found out if you
can
> > > > > do it or not.
> > > >
> > > > Ahem. Do re mi fa soooo....
> > > > Fuck extended prose.
> > > > Now what, kid?
> > >
> > > Well, it's the main means of providing evidence for extended
> > > thought, so as long as you have no need for that in your life you
> > > should get along just fine.
> >
> > Who needs to plot out strategy if he shoots laserbeams in all
> > directions?
>
> Oh, *that's* what they are.
Medic, more morphine for the kid clutching the Minnie Ripperton 8-track.
["Baconbaconbacon... IIIT'S BACONNNNN!"]
> I'd be one fucking disappointed masochist if I came to *you* looking
> for anything resembling chastisement. "Corrective Therapy from Madame
> Phantom Menace - Namecalling a Speciality. No Refunds."
What the fuck are you expecting, a kinder gentler PHANTOM MENACE?
> I don't think so.
>
> > > How long have you been here exactly?
> >
> > A week. What's that got to do with anything, meatpile?
>
> Just plotting a learning curve... Hmm.
So a CLUE SUCK is what you're pulling, eh?
> > > > > I guess we'll have to look forward to that as well.
> > > >
> > > > Who's 'we'? You don't have to look forward to
> > > > anything you don't want to, of course.
> > >
> > > We - that's you and me - can look forward to an amusing portrayal
of
> > > me, by you. Sometime in the *coming* century, with any luck.
> >
> > What's amusing about roadkill?
>
> Ah. You're not up to it. There's a surprise.
Write your own goddam UPA. Why don't YOU drag yourself away from the
Stain-watch and blow everybody away with some Gorgon of the humor world?
> It probably wouldn't have been that funny anyway.
You should have abstained after reading one Flamenet post. Look what
this is doing to you. [snif]
> > > Unless you've been oversold, of course.
> >
> > Who isn't?
>
> Me.
How?
> > How long have you been here exactly?
>
> A week, this time. Feels like longer.
[bows]
> > > > > > > Still, balloo seems to rate you, so maybe you've got
> > > > > > > potential in areas other than straight parody.
>
> > > > > > [toys with fingerbone/button on trench-coat made of human
> > > > > > scalps] Who knows?
> > > > >
> > > > > Atmosphere is good, but the reason for balloo's enthusiasm is
> > > > > proving elusive. It could have been a slow year, I suppose.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe he was trying to bust the gazooms of a bunch of other
guys.
> > >
> > > This is possible, true.
> >
> > And you couldn't cook up that one yourself?
>
> I didn't. No big deal.
Yes, but you didn't. DID-INT.
> > > > What's your final answer?
> > >
> > > To which question?
> >
> > What do you think Balloo was thinking when he rated me, analyst of
> > Balloo?
>
> Seems a little early for a final one.
Afraid to get it wrong on the microfiche or what? Too terrified to
hazard a GUESS?
> > > 'Who knows?' Thought that was rhetorical.
> >
> > "Baaaackpedal..."
>
> Wouldn't quote Stain if I were you.
If the foo shits.
> > > > > > > Show me some tricks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't hit guys with glasses, kid.
> > > > >
> > > > > The guys without glasses seem to be getting off pretty lightly
> > > > > as well. False-froging and one-line namecalling are pretty
much
> > > > > all I can see.
> > > >
> > > > Then maybe you should become one of my faithful Gentle Readers,
> > > > Adrian.
> > >
> > > Pressure o' time, alas.
> >
> > That's a shame.
> >
> > > > > So this is the future. Fanfuckingtastic.
> > > >
> > > > Span...
> > >
> > > ...ish Fly? ...k my monkey? ...dex was ill-advised?
> > >
> > > Whatever, kid.
> >
> > You sound a little sad.
>
> Only a little. a.f does that to me. Digital acres of jiddering
> stupidity, the sump that so many of the biggest wankers on Usenet seem
> to sink down to eventually.
[drumming fingers] Then, er, ah, what's your excuse?
> > > > > > They eventually retreat into their dens filled with shitty
> > > > > > woodland-scenery paintings and Carpenters albums, all the
> > > > > > while wondering why ma never let them play with real
children.
> > > > >
> > > > > Real children (though not quite as real as balloo's) are a lot
> > > > > to do with why I don't spend so much time in a.f these days,
> > > > > AAMOF.
> > > >
> > > > Nice talking to you, Adrian.
> > >
> > > You needn't leave. It'll take me a while to get through to Jack.
> >
> > You gonna top 34K? I can't wait.
>
> Hey, I cut his post by about two thirds replying to it.
Dubious achievement, boy-o.
> > > > > > e-male
> > > > >
> > > > > No substitute for the genuine article, as a rule. E-masculate
> > > > > might be what you're looking for. Mind your fingers.
> > > >
> > > > It was...
> > > > Never mind. Hurry off then, Adrian.
> > >
> > > Got stuff to do here, kid. Sorry.
> >
> > Like what? You don't have time to read MY posts, but you have time
to
> > try convincing Stain you weren't spanked?
>
> Stain and I have a history, and things to discuss of no interest to
> you.
[required] Thanks for admitting that you're going to try convincing
Stain that you weren't spanked.
> Whether I was spanked or not is the least of his worries. Your
> posts aren't the stupidest available here, but I see no indication
> that we'd make entertaining dancing partners.
"You all suck."
Then why are you watching this thread like a hawk, beakface?
> > How much of a 'whatever' was that 'whatever', laddie?
>
> Enough.
Maybe not. We'll see.
e-lope
--
"'The Phantom Menace' refers to the dark side of the force in
the universe."
- George Lucas
the_mighty_balloo
>> Perhaps balloo was onto something after all.
>
> You mean the comment about how your and Stain's disappearances
> could be interpreted identically?
Jack and Howie's absences, to be correct.
Avoid normal situations.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"Chess is the last refuge of reason and justice." -- Edward Lasker
Avoid normal situations.
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:13:00 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
> <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
[..]
>>>>> Troll.
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>
>>> Sequestered?
>>
>> Not really.
> Loony bin?
BTDT. They decided I was too far gone with which to bother.
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
> [...]
>> I mean, the sonofawhore couldn't even handle ENGLISH, as shown by
>> his numerous spelling and grammar errors in every post, much less
>> Arabic -- demonstrating that he's gotten by in his field by ass-
>> sucking rather than virtue. Does anyone but you really believe that
>> he magically transformed into a literate, artistic genius whenever he
>> turned off his newsreader?
> He was an entertaining flamer at times, Sprain.
By antU standards, maybe.
> Not to you, obviously.
> But to some. He wasn't particularly concerned about proofreading, sure,
A man's got to know his limitations. ((tm) Michael Cimino and John Milius,
1973)
>> ...first Adrian asked to be rescued by you, then you had to be
>> rescued by Texas Tom.
> Jesus, what you're capable of reading into things.
Ain't I somethin'?
> I didn't need
> rescuing - I was merely handing over to balloo, who didn't need my
> assistance to complete your humiliation.
"I didn't need rescuing - I was merely handing over to the firemen, who
didn't need any assistance to put out the flames."
> And so he did,
Proof, please... and be sure to leave out the part about how he thinks I
claimed H. L. Mencken was not antiSemitic. Be sure also to leave out
anything about the fabulous coincidence of Texas Tom coming to the rescue,
posting for the first time in almost two years, just as too plain a picture
of the insupportability of Balloo's side was being etched into the ether.
And especially don't forget to leave out the part about... oh, you get the
idea.
>> (Aside: I must say I like that bit from "Know It All"
>> *chuckle*. "There isn't a single person who was here at the time of
>> Texas Tom's departure that believes for a second Stain had anything
>> to do with Howard's departure." When you have facts on your side, you
>> don't need a support group... not that some HFW dirtbag would ever
>> know that.
> Your 'facts' consist of nothing more than a disturbed fantasy of how
> academic reputations are made and lost, apparently based on
> extrapolations from whatever humiliations were heaped on you in high
> school,
Aren't you glad that you were never smart enough or creative enough to
engender the envy of your peers?
> and weird ideas about the (negligible) importance any comment
> made on a recreational Usenet group might have to academics.
More importantly, on knowing such creatures in college, and having a
college buddy who was an English major (facts that you've conveniently
decided to overlook, although I mentioned them in the previous article)
who, eminently sensibly, went into technical writing rather than keep
such company ever again. He used to tell me all about how he wrote long,
long papers in support of ideas he honestly felt to be the biggest load
of bullshit, even though he felt like puking all over his workstation
when doing so, because he knew that he would be regarded as lower than
a cockroach by his professor, not to mention the other members of the
"I Are Smart" crowd (that was his pet term for them), if ever he dared
assert an Incorrect Opinion. It was even worse for him than some, since
he had to maintain a certain GPA to keep getting his college money from
the VA.
Such folks are all about image, Adrian. Evidently, you've swallowed the
"we're so artistic, we're so sophisticated" front sold to you by Howard,
Balloo, and others hook, line, and the proverbial sinker... even though a
regular poster to flame groups ought to have an intimate understanding by
now of the universal human love of aggression. Congratulations.
>> (I especially like that sign-off... "The Artist Formerly Known as
>> Texas Tom". All Arts and Crafts students dream of being real artists,
>> but, for the overwhelming majority of them, it will never happen, and
>> it never should. Namedrop they may, and pose they will, but none
>> of 'em are fit even to lick Spike Lee's basketball. They write about
>> art, but they know nothing of art, for they have no soul. ((tm) Anton
>> Chekhov) If a real artist ever did enter the same room as a parasitic
>> insect like Howard Miller, the latter'd have to run from the room,
>> lest his head explode from sheer envy.
> 'The Artist Formerly Known As' is a reference to Prince,
No shit. The irony still resounds.
The need to grab on things like that smacks of desperation. ((tm) Adrian
Smith, 2000)
[ snip ]
>> (Anyway...)
>>
>> Do you realize that you and Adrian have staged the longest defense
>> of an absent flamer in the history of alt.flame? And of a not
>> particularly meritorious defendant, no less. Far more talented
>> flamers have sank beneath the waves with nary a ripple.
>> Let's not forget that neither of you have produced a shred of
>> evidence to support your sides.
> As balloo pointed out, burden of proof isn't on us.
The burden of proof of my spank claim is indeed on me, so I supported it
with logic and evidence. You claimed at first that Texas Tom retired, then
later you claimed that he had been spanked, but not by me (yet another
indicator that you've been rather less than honest about this issue). The
burden of proof of *that* claim is upon you. Balloo, in turn, claims that
no spank of Texas Twat occurred at all, so the burden of proving that
idea falls to him. Neither of you have come up with anything substanital
to support your respective contentions.
> You have your
> claim. We've demonstrated that your claim is risible.
Of course it's funny. Howard's entire life is (or, perhaps, was *evil grin*)
based on an illusion. Destroy that illusion...
> There is no way
> that Howard's failure to give the source of a cliche he'd identified
> *as* a cliche means *anything*.
If you knew anything about science, you would know that no observation
really means anything without a basis of comparison.
In that fateful summer of 1998, that little mano-a-mano between Howard and
myself started when I barged into a thread entitled "Ill-Read Petey Doomed
to Eternal Ignorance" in which Howard was lecturing Peter Miller about how
REAL writers were immeasurably superior to the latter's beloved H.P. Lovecraft
and Robert Bloch. I happened to drop a Stephen King reference, and Howard
responded with several paragraphs about the best-selling 19th-century scribe
Martin Tupper -- about how much money he made, and about how forgotten he
became such a short time after his inkwell ran dry. I also happened to mention
how _Eyes Without a Face_ and _Peeping Tom_ were flamed within an inch of
their lives when they were released, and Howard responded with how I forgot
to mention _Psycho_ had taken a critical drubbing when it was new as well.
(I hadn't, actually. _Psycho_ was a blockbuster when it was first released
despite the reviews, so it didn't quite fit in with the point I was making,
the other two pictures being financial failures and all.) All this, of course,
and reams of similar noodling, were supposed to make Howard look like quite
the All-Knowing Authority On Art. The Cultural Superior.
Had he actually recognized my Shakespeare gag, he would have responded
with something like, "Awwwwww, wook at the widdle wage-slave quoting the
Bard, ain't that cuuuuuute," followed by at least eight pages of Shakespeare
quotes, Shakespeare biography, regurgitated literary critiques of the Bard's
work with certain critical words switched with synonyms from the nearest
available thesaurus to minimize chances of plagiarism detection, and
Elizabethan history... carefully if ineptly designed to make us think
that he was the God Of All Culture and that we should kiss his Keds just
for posting here, although it really be just him being his usual highly
plonkable botlike self.
At any rate, if he was anywhere nearly as smart as he wanted us all to
think, he would never consciously given me an opening that big. Instead,
he inadvertently helped me lay bare the truth: he was an Arts and Crafts
student, and I am an engineer, and that means I have more talent in my
little finger than he had in his entire body.
Another reason that the "It was a cliche, he recognized the Bard joke as
a cliche and called it as such" defense doesn't hold water is that he was
using the "what a cliche!" rejoinder in response to half the stuff I wrote
against him. It was looking more and more like a stock flame to use on
anything for which he couldn't think of an appropriate reply. (Once again,
the key to understanding is the basis of comparison.)
It's also interesting to note that he accused me of cribbing from _Cahiers
du Cinema_ when I mentioned the Franju and Powell pictures. Sort of like
how Tim Thorne inadvertently revealed an all-too-intimate knowledge of
certain medications when he started launching "You're on prescription drugs"
flames.
> That's the thing about cliches - they
> don't *need* to have their sources identified to anyone other than
> coders combining pretensions to literacy with fucked-up ideas of what
> it means.
The most wonderful irony of all is that I really barely know anything about
the Bard. I just happen to like him enough to have a copy of his Complete
Works around the house.
>> Not even the Fulbright URL counts,
>> and not just because Howard posted it rather than either of you. That
>> Howard actually did get such a scholarship makes the spank even
>> better; it proves that he had even more to lose when he was found out.
>> Let's also not forget the point that neither of you have dared
>> touch with the proverbial ten-foot pole: why, in Heaven's name, that
>> you and Adrian waited to dispute my authorship of his destruction
>> until not only after I'd claimed spank on him several times, not only
>> after my spank of him was nominated for Best Spank in the 1998
>> alt.flame Awards, but until TWENTY-ONE MONTHS AFTER HE VANISHED.
> Can't speak for balloo, but when Kerro mentioned various antUers and
> you replied 'Some of them made good victims', it was the first time I'd
> realised that you took seriously the claims you'd made at the time,
> which I do vaguely remember.
> I don't see why you should place so much importance on a nomination by
> (AFAIK) a single anonymous (unless I can persuade Menjy otherwise)
> little wanker
...yet you take the awards seriously enough to launch a few "nyaah nyaah,
you're only the ninth best flamer" lames in my direction. You can't have it
both ways, Adrian.
Besides, we don't necessarily know that only one person nominated that
spank for best, do we?
> when you were quite happy, back in June, to plonk
> everyone else who remembered the original exchange and said you were
> one sadly deluded puppy.
My arguments are backed by logic and evidence. Yours and Balloo's are
only backed by lung power. If some people around here believe you and him
rather than me, that reflects far more badly on them than me.
> This ain't no democracy, sure, even if I would
> be willing to bet on who's going to be a shoe-in for most tenuous spank
> claim this year.
The same spank that resulted in my nomination for Best Spank in 1998 has
gotten me nominated for Most Tenuous Spank Claim in 2000. I love it. Sort
of like Arrhenius getting the lowest possible passing grade for his thesis
proving the existence of the atom, then getting the Nobel Prize for the
same thesis decades later.
> But this could see you entered (heh) in even *less*
> appealing categories.
Don't count your chickens before they're hatched, Adrian.
Given the highly suspicious circumstances leading to the spawning of
this thread, and the many instances of yours and Balloo's intellectual
dishonesty (a few more of which you were gracious enough to contribute
just in this last article), I maintain that, to be trying so hard in
defense of such a schnook, you two must have an awfully good reason.
Or rather I should say: an awfully bad one.
When the truth comes out, I may find myself the architect of yet another
alt.flame first: the nested spank.
>> I don't know what the real reason is that you've done so. Yet. But
>> whatever it is, it just can't be the reasons you stated... or any
>> good reason for that matter. I want to make some other sort of cruel
>> remark about the traditional love of mediocrity and resentment of
>> excellence, but just that couldn't possibly explain your and Adrian's
>> zeal in the defense of such a pissant.
> I'm pretty sure we've both said this before, but to reiterate - it's
> not about Howard, it's about your claim. It is constructed upon
> foundations of purest fantasy, and although I worry *slightly* about
> the psychological consequences of its (inevitable) collapse, I think it
> all too probable that unless we get bored or have an attack of
> conscience balloo and I will, in Howard's terms, continue to use you
> like a five-dollar whore, occasionally exchanging ends for the sake of
> variety and inviting passers-by to avail themselves of whatever orifice
> we don't happen to be employing at the time.
Go ahead, Childs. Burn me. ((tm) Bill Lancaster, 1982)
> It'll all be doubtless
> quite sociable, but if I were you I'd be asking myself what effect it
> might be having on my long-term marriage prospects. Metaphorically
> speaking.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I've heard it all before. "Ahahahahaha! We kicked your
butt! We did! We did! We really, really, really did! We have always been
at war with Eastasia!"
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"alt.flamers mention antU in every third post. You talk about us, you
emulate us, you stuff your face with antUburgers and listen to antU pop.
I don't think of it as winning so much as absolute cultural domination."
Ian Holmes lays bare the antU desire to be Usenet prom queens, as well
as his own penis envy of the United States,
<Pine.OSF.3.96.971124...@scarp.sanger.ac.uk>
Avoid normal situations.
[ nothing ]
> --
> alt.flame Special Forces
> "Chess is the last refuge of reason and justice." -- Edward Lasker
Blast and hell! Shit! ARRRRGGHHH!!!!
--
alt.flame "thank heavens for backups" Special Forces
The Phantom Menace
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
> [ nothing ]SpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
> Blast and hell! Shit! ARRRRGGHHH!!!!
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSp
enkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpen
kSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkS
penkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpe
nkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSp
enkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpen
kSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkS
penkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpe
nkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
SpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenkSpenk
e-gret
--
"I've seen a shrink before. None of them said I was gay. They just
said I was angry at things I saw as sexually deviant (sluts, gays,
hookers) or deviant in any aspect because I use the conventional
method of expressing sexuality (even though I'd do 9 women at
once), and it's not working for me because I'm much too
aggressive."
<3a2f2073...@news.earthlink.net>
"I am not on AOL (read the headers,newbie), and *I* *am* *in* *the*
*flonk*"
"AOL really helps with anonymous trolling."
"How can an ISP make someone so pissed off?? You really have issues."
<3a27ab05...@news.earthlink.net>
- Poor, poor Cock Rocket.
Dan Nelson
[...]
Looks like you found someone to disagree with in a less desultory
fashion than we managed awhile back. Congratulations.
Nostrils
<by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>Nostrildamus <Nostri...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:13:00 +0000 (UTC), "Avoid normal situations."
>> <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>>>>>> Troll.
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>
>>>> Sequestered?
>>>
>>> Not really.
>
>> Loony bin?
>
> BTDT.
Me too.
>They decided I was too far gone with which to bother.
That's what they all say. All of 'em. Every one.
Even with your fractured English, I can dig it.
By Archie Leach
> Don't you have some Dave Clark Five to
> study up on, DESTROYER OF CASCADES?
This flame has been brought to you by the letters "Y", "H", "B" and "T".
Haven't we discussed this before?
Why don't you be honest and just admit that you bit on some stinky
bait??
ISO9000-compliant since a week ago Wednesday
++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Fuck you, Nikk.. you need to die. This is no longer about an argument
in a thread or anything else.. you make every little bit of it personal,
or attempt to do so, and for that you must die. I ask you.. please..
jump off of a cliff, in front of a truck.. take one for the team. The
world needs less pieces of shit like you on the planet."--words of genus
from M1A1Hokie
By Archie Leach
[...]
> As balloo pointed out, burden of proof isn't on
> us. You have your claim. We've demonstrated > that your claim is
risible. There is no way that
> Howard's failure to give the source of a cliche
> he'd identified *as* a cliche means *anything*. > That's the thing
about cliches - they don't
> *need* to have their sources identified to
> anyone other than coders combining
> pretensions to literacy with fucked-up ideas of > what it means.
[flush]
So how good of a musician are you? Have you ever composed a march? Or
a fugue?