Re: the person posting as peter nyikos continues to run away from challenges to his lies, false claims and misrepresentations
Dr. Michael Mancini
Dr. Michael Mancini <don...@windstream.net> wrote in message
news:ae0db$4b3aefaf$6211a844$10...@ALLTEL.NET...
>
> james g. keegan jr. <jgke...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jgkeegan-EE0F55...@news.individual.net...
> > In article
> > <6f453616-f1de-4bb0...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> > pnyikos <nyi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 9, 8:01 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > it is certainly possible that the real peter nyikos is "allowing"
> > > > someone else to post from his account.
> > >
> > > I have never let anyone else post from the account I have with
> > > Google.
> >
> >
> > the word of a prpven liar like you isn't particularly compelling.
>
> Ah...once again, the pot is calling the kettle black.
Ah...once again, the pot is calling the kettle black.
--Dr. Michael Mancini
The Chief Instigator
...and believing that you're more credible is just another of your futile
fantasies, Bobby.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Syracuse 4 (OT, December 28)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, December 30 at Chicago, 7:05
elizabeth
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:55:08 -0800, Dr. Michael Mancini <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dr. Michael Mancini <don...@windstream.net> wrote in message
> >news:ae0db$4b3aefaf$6211a844$10...@ALLTEL.NET...
>
> >>news:jgkeegan-EE0F55...@news.individual.net...
> >> > In article
> >> > <6f453616-f1de-4bb0-864f-3247a7f1a...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> >> > pnyikos <nyik...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> >> > > On Dec 9, 8:01 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > it is certainly possible that the real peter nyikos is "allowing"
> >> > > > someone else to post from his account.
>
> >> > > I have never let anyone else post from the account I have with
> >> > > Google.
>
> >> > the word of a prpven liar like you isn't particularly compelling.
>
> >> Ah...once again, the pot is calling the kettle black.
> > Ah...once again, the pot is calling the kettle black.
>
> > --Dr. Michael Mancini
>
> ...and believing that you're more credible is just another of your futile
> fantasies, Bobby.
>
> --
> www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
> LAST GAME: Houston 5, Syracuse 4 (OT, December 28)
>
> - Show quoted text -
Just can't get rid of that fuckwad, can we?
The Chief Instigator
> On Dec 30, 9:16?am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@io.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:55:08 -0800, Dr. Michael Mancini <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Dr. Michael Mancini <don...@windstream.net> wrote in message
>> >news:ae0db$4b3aefaf$6211a844$10...@ALLTEL.NET...
>>
>> >> james g. keegan jr. <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:jgkeegan-EE0F55...@news.individual.net...
>> >> > In article
>> >> > <6f453616-f1de-4bb0-864f-3247a7f1a...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> >> > > On Dec 9, 8:01 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > it is certainly possible that the real peter nyikos is "allowing"
>> >> > > > someone else to post from his account.
>>
>> >> > > I have never let anyone else post from the account I have with
>> >> > > Google.
>>
>> >> > the word of a prpven liar like you isn't particularly compelling.
>>
>> >> Ah...once again, the pot is calling the kettle black.
>> > Ah...once again, the pot is calling the kettle black.
>>
>> > --Dr. Michael Mancini
>>
>> ...and believing that you're more credible is just another of your futile
>> fantasies, Bobby.
>>
>> --
>> ? ? ?www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php?(TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? LAST GAME: Houston 5, Syracuse 4 (OT, December 28)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? NEXT GAME: Wednesday, December 30 at Chicago, 7:05- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Just can't get rid of that fuckwad, can we?
If he's as stupid as the impersonator channeling him, he'll get zapped by
lightning, sooner or later.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
Dr. Michael Mancini
> In article
> <cf26dd89-fddb-46cd...@t42g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
> pnyikos <nyi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 10:51 am, Galen Hekhuis <ghekh...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:53:19 -0500, james g. keegan jr.
>
> > > >in the early days of usenet newsgroups, there was a clear, conceptual
> > > >distinction between posts and emails. without question, it was
> > > >considered a scumball action to post email. as time passed, i think
the
> > > >distinctions became less clear. threats, attempts at intimidation,
> > > >harrassment, sexual or other coupled with the huge change in the type
> > > >of person using the net may have resulted in situations where the
right
> > > >thing to do *is* to post email.
> >
> > Yes. I wonder when the transition took place.
> >
> > > There is no way in the world I can prove that I did not send Peter
> > > Nyikos email, in fact, as I've noted, I may well have. What can never
> > > be proven is the content of the emails. (Well, maybe, if you were to
> > > impound the sendee's computer, and found a copy of the indentical
> > > email in a "sent" folder or something.) Posting email, especially old
> > > email, is almost always a "who do you believe" situation. As Keegan
> > > points out, there is no way for the reader to verify any of the
> > > information.
> >
> > I posted it in the following thread
>
>
> that is another false claim
Liar, liar, pants on fire!
> you posted what you asserted to be email from galen without a shred of
> evidence to support your claim.
Where's YOUR evidence to prove that he's a liar, Junior. Oh, sorry, I
forgot. You don't have any.
> the word of a well-known liar like you is not sufficient.
But the word of a well-known idiot moroon as yourself is? What a dumbarse!
Ray Fischer
No, your practice is to call anyone a liar if you can't refute their claim.
Mancini <don...@windstream.net in <743dd$4b3c0b6f$6211a844$78...@ALLTEL.NET>
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Dr. Michael Mancini
Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4b3d5c92$0$1601$742e...@news.sonic.net...
Now you're sounding more like Keegan. Are you becoming senile or paranoid in
your old age?
james g. keegan jr.
"Dr. Michael Mancini" <don...@windstream.net> wrote:
> Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
> news:4b3d5c92$0$1601$742e...@news.sonic.net...
> > No, your practice is to call anyone a liar if you can't
> > refute their claim.
>
> Now you're sounding more like Keegan. Are you becoming senile or paranoid in
> your old age?
ha ha. i can picture you shaking in fear as you sense them closing in on
you again, bobby. are you afraid that this time will be worse than the
last?
Ray Fischer
Those are your words, moron. Why did you leave off the attribution?
Stupidity or dishonesty?
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Galen Hekhuis
It can't be proven, not one way or the other. The logs have been
erased or overwritten years ago, if the machines even still exist.
At the time, I worked for the University of Virginia medical school as
a laboratory instrument maker. I had an AT&T 3B2 on my desk
(actually the machine was on a shelf nearby, I only had the terminal
on my desk), a Kaypro II, a Mac SE, and an AT&T 6300. I had one of
the few rooms where Unix(TM), CP/M, AppleDOS and MS-DOS was spoken
fluently. Some other department (anatomy, I think) named their
machines "Galen," as in "Galen" for their 3B15, and "Galen1-6"for the
smaller 3B2s, as you might expect, I wanted (and got) an account on
their 3B15 for reasons that should be obvious.
I told you that so I could tell you this: I knew a lot about what I
was doing with computers then, and "galen" should NOT appear in the
path of my emails at the time. Oh, for sure I had an account on
"galen," which I used for reading and posting news, but not for
email. As I recall, the newsreader they had installed on "galen"
didn't have a convenient way to "respond to poster via email" like so
many newsreaders do today, you had to "shell out," then fire up the
local mailer, etc. I did it a few times, I knew how, but I didn't do
it very often and certainly not to acknowledge some submission. It
was just too much of a pill to do. All my email was forwarded to my
"dale" account. I ran a program on it that checked for new email
every ten minutes or so. My address at the time was g...@virginia.edu,
but even the machine "virginia" (which was a virtual machine, but
that's another story), forwarded my mail to my "dale" account. Every
account did. Even if someone had responded by email to the path in my
posting (and not my email address) the mail still would have wound up
in my "dale" inbox, and any response would have had "dale" in the
path.
What Peter Nyikos appears to have done is taken header info from one
of my postings and used it to construct the email he posted. I don't
know why.