Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Would Jesus Shop at Unionized Wal-mart?
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Amy Likes Pot!
Dec 17, 2006, 5:43:38 PM12/17/06
to
Linc Madison <lin...@suespammers.org> wrote:
> In article <6zehh.4224$yC5....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, MioMyo
> <USA_P...@Somewhere.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > Jesus loves cheap tube socks.
> > >>
> > >> I think that the left-wing, the unions and anyone else who
> > >> attempts to employ Jesus in such an earthly political argument is
> > >> just finding another way to use the Lord's name in vein!
>
> First of all, that's exactly my point. Jesus isn't pro-union or
> anti-union or Democrat or Republican. Besides that, he never wore tube
> socks.
> In article <6zehh.4224$yC5....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, MioMyo
> <USA_P...@Somewhere.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > Jesus loves cheap tube socks.
> > >>
> > >> I think that the left-wing, the unions and anyone else who
> > >> attempts to employ Jesus in such an earthly political argument is
> > >> just finding another way to use the Lord's name in vein!
>
> First of all, that's exactly my point. Jesus isn't pro-union or
> anti-union or Democrat or Republican. Besides that, he never wore tube
> socks.
And you KNOW that? Do you know how badly leather sandles would chaffe if
you wore them EVERYDAY?
> > > In vein? Not in arteries?
> >
> > http://m-w.com/dictionary/veinhttp://m-w.com/dictionary/vein
> >
> > See definition 6a,
>
> Which clarifies nothing. "Use the Lord's name in vein" is still
> meaningless. ITYMTS "in *vain*."
0 new messages