Dirt on the Guv for Lamont- What goes on in the Corrupticourts
Mort Zuckerman
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com,
bob.d...@latimes.com
Subject: Dirt on the Guv for Lamont- What goes on in the
Corrupticourts
Date: Nov 5, 2009 8:26 AM
Dirt on the Guv for Lamont-
What goes on in the Corrupticourts:
http://www.actionlyme.org/AMICUS_Figueroa_13_Feb_06.htm
Jodi Rell never once answered all of
my complaints about the abuse of the
female prisoners in the jails.
AMICUS CURIAE AFFIDAVIT filed on behalf of Elsie Figueroa by Kathleen
M. Dickson, et al
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State of Connecticut vs Elsie Figueroa
DOCKET _______________________________
New Britain Superior Court
20 Franklin Square
New Britain, CT 06051
February 13, 2006
AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF ON BEHALF OF ELSIE FIGUEROA
I, Kathleen M. Dickson, do HEARBY SWEAR that the following statements
are truthful, sworn testimony, written as any reasonable person would
understand, before God, as stated, and regarding the known
incompetence, perjury, acts of defrauding the both the courts and The
United States of America, the criminal behavior of the Connecticut
Department of Criminal Justice and the CT Department of Children and
Families (DCF) and related staff, and are in support of significant
mitigation of charges against Elsie Figueroa.
I further claim that no Connecticut resident stands a chance of intact
and sane survival once “handled” by the incompetent, criminally insane
frauds -Department of Children and Families- and the promoters and
supporters of other abuses by staff of the Department of Health, the
Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, and the Department
of “Corrections.”
I. ABUSE OF PRISONERS in the PRISONS by the GUARDS (page 2)
II. INCOMPETENCE of the MENTAL HEALTH STAFF in the PRISON (page 5)
Neuroleptic-induced akathisia and violence: a review
III DCF is AWARE of the BRAIN DAMAGE CAUSED BY PSYCHOTROPICS (page
9)
DCF WIRETAPPING
IV. INCOMPETENCE and PERJURY of DMHAS (page 13)
Joseph More, Elizabeth Byron, Vladimir Coric, Alice Smith, Christopher
Gottschalk, Kenneth Marcus
V. INCOMPETENCE, CRIMINAL SCIENTIFIC FRAUD and RACKETEERING by YALE
UNIVERSITY LYMErix and the testing for Lyme disease
(page 15)
VI. INCOMPETENCE and PERJURY of YALE FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY
Vladimir Coric, James Phillips; The fact that Yale knows how to
perform a valid mental evaluation
BRAIN VOLUME REPORT,
Ethics questions raised by the neuropsychiatric, neuropsychological,
educational, developmental, and family characteristics of 18 juveniles
awaiting execution in Texas. NIH Clinical Trials, Bipolar (page 16)
VII. OUTRAGEOUSLY STUPID LIARS: DCF, NANCY MARTIN, JAMES PHILLIPS
(page 22)
VIII. PATRICIA LEEBENS DEFRAUDS THE COURT AND THEN LEAVES THE COUNTRY
(page 29)
IX. “NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND” and the DCF’s DEFRAUDING the FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT OVER TANF FUNDS (page 30)
X. CONCLUSION (page 31)
I. ABUSE OF PRISONERS in the PRISONS by the GUARDS
I personally have witnessed numerous examples of direct abuse and
provocation of prisoners in the York prison. I have witnessed a guard
taking a swing at a prisoner’s head with his fist (she ducked). I
have witnessed every kind of verbal abuse to prisoners, randomly and
without provocation. I am aware of two specific circumstances (case
names) where the guards, rather than defend a prisoner attacked by
another, either blamed the attackee, or demanded that the attackee hit
back, and then the guards pounced, throwing both in “segregation,” so
that the guards would not have to file a police report of an assault.
I can provide the names of those involved and the witnesses.
I was involved in a situation where the head nurse of the mental
health section of the women’s prison, Jan, tried to provoke another
prisoner to violence against myself and two other prisoners, by lying
to that other prisoner (who had a reputation for violence) about what
we did and said. I can provide the names of the individuals involved
who will be witnesses should the occasion arise where I am called to
demonstrate that these events occurred as I report they did to this
court in this Amicus.
The condition of the women’s prison promotes and supports violence,
since, in this way, the guards get plenty of overtime. I have seen
instances where a prisoner was agitated, and where a DMHAS staff
person single-handedly was able to get the prisoner to calm down
(CVH). The reverse happens in the prison. In the case of Elsie
Figueroa, she would have learned from “Corrections” that violence is
necessary to survival because the guards absolutely will not protect
the prisoners. The guards promote fights and enjoy them. There is
no other entertainment going on in the prison, and so the guards enjoy
the fights very much.
I have seen a prison guard have an angry, fiercely gesticulating
conversation with no one. The guard was walking along, completely
alone, on a “lock down,” and thought no one was looking. I can
provide the name of this guard. Being a prison guard is clearly
attractive to racist/KKK/member psychopaths. Working as prison
guards, is where most of the Connecticut white supremacists can be
found. This is 100% undeniable.
Given the prison guards’ obvious lack of restraint and obvious lack of
effort to hide their abundant and pervasive racism, one can imagine
the guards talk about what heroes they are to their children at home,
“Yes, Junior, today I body-slammed another POS-moron for sticking her
tongue out at me. It was great. Perhaps when you grow up you can
also participate in the fun. You don’t even need a college degree,
you only work 20 years, and look at all my nice gold jewelry that I
wear to the prison every day. Look at that gorgeous car out there in
the driveway. And all I have to do is go to work and be a vicious
psychopath all day, and I get paid for it!!!”
This is precisely the sentiment I encountered in the prison. How can
these guards turn it off at the end of a work shift at the prison?
Hatred, abuse and violence is precisely what is taught by example to
young women in the prison, who have a reputation in the prison for
being violent and dangerous, true or not. They are called “Y-Os”
which is prison jargon for Youthful Offenders. The word among the
other prisoners is that the YOs are to be avoided because they are
violent, true or not.
A young female incarcerated in this environment will undoubtedly very
quickly learn that violence is the only means of survival. The
women’s prison is probably now much like the men’s prisons, and this
is due to the fact that the guards foster violence and will not
protect anyone who is a victim of violence by another prisoner. One
wonders if the prisoners themselves are actually more violent
nowadays, or is this due to exposure to the vicious and insane
psychopathic male guards?
The guards simply do not want to fill out the paperwork. Any kind of
violence brings “a code.” Then, 15 guards run around hysterically,
with all their jingly tough-guy metal equipment, and with their
trousers tucked into their boots as if they are on some SWAT Team
Wannabe “Terminator” Safari out to save the whole world from the bad
guys. They have no idea how foolish they appear. They get the camera
AFTER the incident, and capturing only what they want to capture on
video.
These are UNARMED WOMEN, are we are talking about. Why the SWAT Team
Wannabe response? Because the vast majority of prison guards in
Connecticut are psychopaths. Where else would we expect to find a
psychopath regularly employed?
The guards make no attempt to hide the fact that they are gang
members. In this sworn affidavit, I am stating under penalty of
perjury, that I have heard prison guards discuss being members of a
gang. The prison guards are not allowed to be gang members.
The point is, how can DCF send these girls into this environment and
expect to not have churned out future violent criminals? How is
this child, Figueroa, responsible for having acquired hatred and
violence “skills” at the hands of the DCF and “Corrections?”
When the HARTFORD COURANT does a story about DCF or “Corrections” or
how children are “handled,” they rarely give the children’s or the DCF-
abused family’s side of the story. In my “case,” I have even offered
to sign over all of DCF’s “records,” with the stipulation that I get
to demonstrate where the DCF are lying in their “records.” I am
happy to do that to anyone who comes forward and would like to learn
more about this, under CT Statute 17a-28. This is the one way the
public and the legislators can know the real reason for DCF’s
failures. I never get a response or a call back from either the
Governor or any of the legislators, despite my record of Lyme activism
and accomplishments, and despite the fact that I was an analytical
chemist for Pfizer for nearly 10 years. One would think a chemist
would have something logical to say, since how can one get a degree in
chemistry if one is as insane as DCF says I am? ‘Especially when they
themselves (DCF) invented what I did and said, meaning they’re the
ones who are psychotic.
If I told the FDA vaccine committee in Bethesda, MD, in 2001, in
simple terms, that none of the contributors to the national blood
testing standard discussions for Lyme disease in Dearborn, Michigan
(1994) agreed with the current testing for Lyme disease, and that none
of these labs found the current CDC method for the detection of Lyme
disease to exceed 25% accuracy, and challenge all to prove me wrong -
despite these contributions and opinions being published and published
science – how is it no one has done so?
If I say, “Yale University committed scientific fraud, and know how to
test for Lyme disease with 94.4% accuracy and 100% specificity, and
they have a patent for this method (US Pat No 5, 618, 533), but this
accurate method is not in use because they wanted to pass off their
bogus Lyme vaccine (LYMErix, Yale patent US Pat No. 6, 747, 294),” why
am I not challenged about these facts by anyone in the State of
Connecticut? Isn’t DCF mandated to discover if children are not
receiving proper medical care? The current CDC testing for Lyme
disease is at best, 25% accurate. That mean 75% of the cases are
being missed.
Why do these facts never make it into the newspaper?
If I say “Yale University committed an enormous crime, and that they
never had a Lyme vaccine and they are denying us the use of this early
and accurate test for Lyme,” why does not one person in the State
investigate whether or not that is true?
No one can sue me for slander or libel. That would be because I
never slander or libel.
II. INCOMPETENCE of the MENTAL HEALTH STAFF in the PRISON
I have Lyme borreliosis, which is a permanent brain infection. I was
falsely arrested by the thoroughly psychotic ASSISTANT ATTORNEY
GENERAL JESSICA GAUVIN, and falsely criminally charged with GAUVIN’s
own insanity. I was reporting Gauvin’s and the DCF’s insanity and
criminal behavior to the US ATTTORNEY KEVIN J. O’CONNOR, in New Haven,
repeatedly. Gauvin invented for me that I have “command
hallucinations to kill,” etc., and then she falsely criminally charged
me with saying that myself, when she knew that was false. I was not
allowed a trial. My children, who also have Lyme, were fraudulently
removed and placed with a known child-abuser, wife-beater, and
psychiatrist-diagnosed “sociopath,” DONALD G. DICKSON, and are not
being treated for Lyme disease and Ehrlichiosis.
This is: risk of injury to minors, medical neglect, false
allegations, are numerous frauds upon the court, perjury, and then a
false arrest. If GAUVIN invented for me that I have “command
hallucinations to kill,” then that is, by definition, an example of
AAG JESSICA GAUVIN’S PSYCHOSIS.
While in the prison, the prison health staff were insane, vicious,
lied to other prisoners to provoke fights among the prisoners. They
refused to treat me for Lyme disease, although they had a court order
to do so from Judge Kevin P. McMahon. The prison staff had an order
to give my ibuprofen, but they declined to tell me this and never gave
it to me.
I had a discussion about my aberrant bloodwork with HUMBERTO
TEMPORINI, MD, in the prison and when I explained to him that I have
Lyme disease and High Functioning Autism (which comes with it a known
immune incompetence, since HFA is a condition of reversed duplication
and over-expression of a B cell lymphoma molecule, resulting in
incompetent lymphocytes), Temporini and the other staff were furious.
They do not like to hear medical facts from a pharmaceutical chemist.
One wonders what are the criteria for hiring such staff, if they would
not even consider verifying these claims on MEDLINE, rather than be
furious-acting “mental health staff,” and refuse to follow a judge’s
order for medical treatment?
I had a discussion with Dr. CRABBE in the mental health section of the
prison. He offered me whatever psychotropic I wanted. I said, “No
thanks, they are all brain damaging.” The prisoners are allowed to
get whatever psychotropic they like and most try to get Seroquel in
order to sleep their sentences away, unaware that this will contribute
to a dementia in the same exact way street drugs do. Chronic specific
neurotransmitter receptor antagonism results in the down-regulation of
that receptor. Chronic specific neurotransmitter transporter
antagonism (SSRIs) results in the down-regulation of that
transporter. People with depression end up more depressed; people
with severe anxiety end up more anxious to the point of mania. The
latter is known as “rebound psychosis.” No one in Connecticut wants
to hear these facts, although I am quoting the published science. The
effect of psychotropics on young people is unknown, but neither the
DCF, DMHAS, or “Corrections,” care about these bad outcomes of their
“treatments” because there is no incentive for a reduction in the
bodies in this meatgrinder called Connecticut, or a reduction in the
overtime created by creating the deranged and the “criminals,” through
this organized abuse.
I do not know if Ms. Figueroa took advantage of the available “brain
candy” (psychotropics) at the prison, but if she did, and if she took
any kind of psychotropic whatsoever, her case is automatically
mitigated because the published science says it is.
1: J Forensic Sci. 2003 Jan;48(1):187-9.
Related Articles, Links
Neuroleptic-induced akathisia and violence: a review.
Leong GB, Silva JA.
Center for Forensic Services, Western State Hospital, Tacoma, WA
98498-7213, USA. leo...@dshs.wa.gov
Surprisingly, the association of neuroleptic-induced akathisia and
aggressive behavior was not formally recognized until nearly two and
one-half decades of antipsychotic prescribing had passed. Using a
search of the anglophonic literature, this phenomenon is reviewed.
Advances in psychopharmacology have reduced neuroleptic-induced
akathisia and hold promise to eliminate it altogether. Nonetheless,
important clinical and forensic aspects of neuroleptic-induced
akathisia and aggression remain and are explored.
Publication Types: Review
PMID: 12570226 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
This means that it is well-understood that liability is to be shared
if there is a known correlation between psychotropics and violence-
that association being the psychomotor agitation caused by the
psychotropics.
We have all heard of criminal violence being associated with illegal
drug trade and use. How is it not common knowledge that the same
occurs with prescription “medications?” The State is in possession of
the full text of this above abstract. I am an analytical chemist and
used to work for Pfizer.
Here is Pfizer discussing how to treat the SSRI’s induced agitation
(akathisia), while simultaneously denying it exists:
1: J Psychopharmacol. 1998;12(2):192-214.
Related Articles, Links
SSRI-induced extrapyramidal side-effects and akathisia: implications
for treatment.
Lane RM.
Pfizer Inc., New York, NY 10017, USA. la...@pfizer.com
The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may occasionally
induce extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) and/or akathisia.This may be
a consequence of serotonergically-mediated inhibition of the
dopaminergic system. Manifestations of these effects in patients may
depend on predisposing factors such as the presence of psychomotor
disturbance, a previous history of drug-induced akathisia and/or EPS,
concurrent antidopaminergic and/or serotonergic therapy, recent
monoamine oxidase inhibitor discontinuation, comorbid Parkinson's
disease and possibly deficient cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme status.
There is increasing awareness that there may be a distinct form of
melancholic or endogenous depression with neurobiological
underpinnings similar to those of disorders of the basal ganglia such
as Parkinson's disease. Thus, it is not surprising that some
individuals with depressive disorders appear to be susceptible to
developing drug-induced EPS and/or akathisia. In addition, the
propensity for the SSRIs to induce these effects in individual
patients may vary within the drug class depending, for example, on
their selectivity for serotonin relative to other monoamines, affinity
for the 5-HT2C receptor, pharmacokinetic drug interaction potential
with concomitantly administered neuroleptics and potential for
accumulation due to a long half-life. The relative risk of EPS and
akathisia associated with SSRIs have yet to be clearly established.
The potential risks may be reduced by avoiding rapid and unnecessary
dose titration. Furthermore, early recognition and appropriate
management of EPS and/or akathisia is required to prevent the impact
of these effects on patient compliance and subjective well-being. It
is important that the rare occurrence of EPS in patients receiving
SSRIs does not preclude their use in Parkinson's disease where their
potentially significant role requires more systematic evaluation.
Publication Types: Review
PMID: 9694033 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
“The relative risk of EPS and akathisia associated with SSRIs have yet
to be clearly established.” It is legally safer for pharmaceutical
companies to pretend they don’t know what they are talking about.
After long term use and the removal of SSRIs, a person ends up more
depressed than when they started because the specific antagonism is of
a serotonin transporter. The body senses that, “Oh, I don’t need this
much serotonin,” since the normal amount is not being reabsorbed.
Fewer serotonin transporters are needed. Remove the drug? The person
is left with an overall serotonin deficit. Some people claim they now
can’t live without antidepressants. This would be why.
Rather than it being true that “mental illnesses” are usually the
result of a chemical imbalance, in truth and in fact, psychotropics
result in a chemical imbalance. Whoever has seen someone detox from
heroin – up close and personal - knows what I mean when I say
“chemical imbalance.” These poor victims of the Department of
Corrections’ incompetence are “chemical imbalancing” all over the
floors, walls, and ceilings of the prison for 5 days straight and the
guards stand in the doorways and laugh at this. I do not
exaggerate. These heroin detox-ors claim they feel like they are
“crawling out of their skin.” That’s exactly what it looks like to
the casual observer.
The prisons are required by CT law to treat “clinically relevant
heroin addiction.” They never do, and then they lie about it. This
is factual. A prison psychologist lied about this to my face, and
then immediately interrupted his own interview and left the room. I
frightened the prison psychologist away with a fact.
The prison psychiatrists prescribe any drug anyone wants, and the more
sedated the prisoners the better, is the probable thinking, but this
actually results in increased violence, and when these prisoners are
released they are triple basket-cases, and of course, return to
prison.
III. DCF is AWARE of the BRAIN DAMAGE CAUSED BY PSYCHOTROPICS
The State of Connecticut, DCF, is fully aware of numerous mechanisms
of psychotropics-induced agitation and violence because I gave the DCF
several full text articles in the early winter (January 2003) and fall
of 2003, regarding these specific drug-rebound effects, and informed
them that they were now partially liable for any cases where their
forced-drugged victims became violent.
The family of the Burgos boy who committed suicide in Manson prison
last summer now has a wrongful death case against the State of
Connecticut. No children should be force-drugged since the published
scientific data already identifies the brain damage caused by
psychotropics, which I now present to the court. It is common
knowledge that “10 different psychiatrists will give 10 different
diagnoses of the same patient.” (The New York Times) Therefore, would
it not be convenient for the DCF just to assign any child any
diagnosis, depending on the treatment protocol being developed at
Yale? If all psychotropics are simply anesthetics (technically, this
is what they are as neurotransmitter blockers), won’t any “treatment”
result in a diminution of “symptoms?”
People don’t realize that this is exactly what most psychotropics
are: Anesthesia, where they aren’t stimulants. DCF kidnaps kids and
then numbs them into oblivion. DCF is not responsible for these
brain-damaged-children-come-adults, and have no interest in them
unless these victims later become parents. For some families, they
are never out of the State’s crosshairs their entire lives and recycle
through various incarceration-like “interventions,” rendering them
hopeless, uneducated, and having no real-life skills. One would
expect to find these young women to be out of their minds and they
are.
I hand-delivered these full-text scientific articles that show that
all psychotropics are brain damaging to LAURA LUSTIG of the New
Learning Center Westport, 1200 Boston Post Road, on November 20,
2003. Laura Lustig’s second in command at that time was MARK MARCUS,
who advertised on Lustig’s website that he was a former DCF
Commissioner. Lustig also had a contract at that time to train the
cognitively- and morally-impaired DCF “social workers” to be even more
truth and fact- impaired.
DCF’s PATRICIA LEEBENS defrauded the court with her Order of Temporary
Custody of my children 6 days later (November 26, 2003), and did not
mention this databinder full of scientific journal articles, nor did
she state what was the true content of the other databinder left with
Laura Lustig - the 3 inch databinder dated 11-16-03 - which contained
my responses to complaints I filed against the DCF staff to the
Commission on Human Rights (PEKAH WALLACE, Waterbury CHRO) and
Statewide Bar Counsel (ATTORNEY GERALD DWYER, New Haven). Leebens
defrauded the court, and then “left the country” and could not be
cross-examined in the 10 days allowed after the issue of the OTC for
my children. I completely proved my “case” was fraudulent by Nov 20,
2003, and that these were all false allegations and nonsense reported
by the criminally insane NANCY MARTIN, DCF staff, DONALD DICKSON, and
JAMES PHILLIPS. DCF would have none of it. They did not want these
scientific facts or these facts of false allegations and perjury, nor
the scientific evidence regarding the specific brain damage caused by
psychotropics to become a record of the court. They are now, and DCF
is liable. Leebens wanted me to be committed on the day of the OTC.
There were two State Troopers standing by. I fooled them. I had
always been telling the truth, whereas Gauvin and everyone else were
not.
DCF WIRETAPPING
The formula for DCF is to tell everyone you, their victim, knows,
stories that are 180 degrees from the truth. They call up everyone
their victim knows and lies about them, so that all are happy to come
and perjure themselves in the State’s behalf. They also bug all of
their victims’ phones.
This DCF phone-bugging will become common knowledge. Gauvin repeated
what I said the night before on the phone to my children, verbatim,
the very next day, in the courtroom. Elements of my phone
conversations are being repeatedly rebroadcast onto the internet.
Since the Stonington Police will do nothing about my complaints of my
phone being bugged, they must either approve of it, or this remains
the case with the DCF still having bugged my phone and allowing others
to be privileged to my conversations.
The issue is, how can anyone mount a defense of their fraudulent DCF
persecution, if one is not allowed to have privileged phone
conversations with their lawyer?
This will become common knowledge in the interest of public safety.
All psychotropics are brain damaging, cause brain cell lose, and cause
agitation and/or dementia. Stimulants (Ritalin) cause the down-
regulation of dopaminergic tone and, in effect, decrease
intelligence. The addition to prescription psychotropics occurs
through the exact same mechanisms as addiction to street drugs. My
own sibling complained of spending the whole day crying in the bathtub
when he/she ran out of Zoloft. I told my own incompetent psychiatrist
about this (JAMES PHILLIPS), and he would not do anything for him/
her. My sibling was never this bad before he/she started taking
Zoloft. The effect over the long term is, again, greater depression,
due to the down-regulation of serotonin transporters. What if she/he
had decided to take his/her own life? How would I have felt, if he/
she did and I did not do enough for him/her?
James Phillips was my psychiatrist for “child abuse.”
This child abuser was CAROLYN MARTIN, the mother of another of my
siblings who was having this rebound reaction to Zoloft. Nancy Martin
invented the false allegations against me, with her mother, Carolyn
Martin. Carolyn Martin invented for me that I “showed up at her house
and threatened to slit my own throat.” I removed my children from the
presence of Carolyn Martin because she was physically violent and
verbally abusive to my children in early December 2002.
This is a clear pattern. Carolyn Martin was violent and abusive to
her own children, and she started in with her hatred and violence on
my children. She told my daughter Diane that Diane was not sick with
Lyme disease- that Diane was, “just stupid and clumsy, like your
mother.” This may seem like no big deal unless one has seen Carolyn
Martin in action. She nearly broke her foot kicking my now-deceased
brother, JAMES MARTIN, and she beat us with a cat of nine tails but
she now blames all of these beatings on my now-deceased father.
Carolyn Martin beat us with a whip, too. My father never kicked
anyone, nor did he ever say anything vicious and mean about anyone.
He also hated liars, much like myself.
DCF approves of all of this abuse and reported in their “records” that
Carolyn Martin asked me to leave. No such thing happened. I took my
children away from Carolyn Martin because she was abusing my children
and saying horrible, untrue things about my children, to others.
Carolyn Martin apparently was also saying horrible and untrue things
about me, to others. Carolyn Martin is insane, Nancy Martin is
insane, and yet Carolyn Martin is still in the care of other children-
a child who the schools wanted to diagnose as having Childhood
Schizophrenia.
In any other world, people would observe that there is something very
wrong with Carolyn Martin to have caused this much disorder in the
lives of so many children: 5 of her own, and 4 grandchildren. Not so
Connecticut DCF-land. DCF loves this kind of viciousness, lying, and
abuse, since they do it themselves.
IV. INCOMPETENCE and PERJURY of YALE/DMHAS
Joseph More, James Phillips Elizabeth Byron, Vladimir Coric, Alice
Smith, Christopher Gottschalk, Kenneth Marcus, “Medical Director” for
DMHAS
It should be stated from the outset that DMHAS is now being
investigated for their well-known incompetence by the federal
government. DMHAS has also been sued by the Office of Protection and
Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities, for their incompetence.
In my “cases,” the above individuals committed perjury. Lyme is a
brain disease, I have this brain disease, DMHAS’ CVH staff spoke with
my infectious diseases specialist, yet perjured themselves about that
conversation (DMHAS’ Elizabeth Byron). All of the above in one way or
another denied that Lyme is a brain disease, that it causes an organic
delirium, and that the American Psychiatric Association’s guidelines
on the treatment of a delirium specifically state that even in the
condition of a comorbid “psychiatric disorder,” the delirium is to be
treated medically first, because psychotropics can exacerbate the
delirium. This is a long-understood phenomenon, the newest research
supports this, and advises against treating Alzheimer’s patients with
central nervous system depressing psychotropics (antipsychotics).
This “treatment” can kill older people for the obvious reason that CNS
depressing agents act wherever there is the right neurotransmitter
receptor, which could also be the heart or other organs.
A well-known phenomenon of CNS depressing psychotropics are heart
irregularities. Anyone with a brain in their head- which clearly
excludes anyone who works for the State of Connecticut – would
understand that a brain anesthetic might have the effect of
anesthetizing certain other autonomically regulated CNS function, such
as the heart and breathing. DMHAS and DCF now want all of their
lying, ridiculous “records” to be kept 100% confidential, such that
they are not held accountable for the accidental deaths due to
misdiagnosis and malpractice treatment of their victims. One such
victim is LESLIE ANDINO who has Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple
Sclerosis is a brain disease. Ms. Andino was treated with CNS
depressants by the incompetent staff at DMHAS. She was – not
surprisingly- never “restored to competency,” and with this continued
malpractice treatment of her as a result of her being mismanaged and
uncared for at nursing home, resulted in an accidental fire, which
killed 16 elderly people who never should have been housed with
persons with simple medical illnesses that affect the brain, Ms.
Andino will continue to deteriorate. Her life is effectively OVER
because of the incompetence of others. Ms Andino could have been in a
group home for disabled people- something I requested funding for from
JOHN G. ROWLAND in 1997 and was met with the typical Connecticut-
Incompetence Response. I asked for money for a group home for
disabled people who have Lyme/Multiple Sclerosis. The State sent me
legal references about group homes and ignored my specific request for
funding for this group home. I imagine that had anyone in the State
of Connecticut been competent to care, perhaps all 17 of them involved
in the destruction of the nursing home might still have a life/be
alive. The bodies hidden from view by DMHAS continue to add up,
despite their efforts to be unaccountable.
I have no idea how GOTTSCHALK can call himself a neurologist and dare
to say to me that Lyme disease is not a permanent brain infection,
when this fact was “well-established” in 1944, and “well-known” in
1975. One wonders if there is not a pervasive collective Jungian
psychosis occurring at Yale University. They were formerly sons of
Belial? The only reason I say this is because James Phillips is still
a Freudian, and physical and verbal assaults against children (CAROLYN
MARTIN) and Lyme neuroborreliosis have absolute ZERO to do with sex,
but to a Freudian everything has everything to do with sex. For all
of Yale and DMHAS to perjure themselves to defend this man’s
malpractice reminds one of the Prince of Licentious (Belial- a
mythical demon):
Licentious
Unrestrained by law or morality; lawless; immoral; dissolute; lewd;
lascivious, Unrestrained; uncurbed; uncontrolled; unruly; riotous;
ungovernable; wanton; profligate; dissolute; lax; loose; sensual;
impure; unchaste; lascivious; immoral, dissolute indulgence in sensual
pleasure.
It is important to recognize how far hypothetical psychiatric nonsense
has perverted the human experience. Jung and Freud were “giants” in
the non-science of Psychiatry. Can anyone get into this “making it up
as we go along” game, or is it only the purvue of Yale Psychiatric
lunatics? I prefer to stick with the facts. A factual and scientific
approach to life has served me well working for Pfizer and studying
the scientific fraud in “Lyme disease.”
DMHAS/CVH’s ALICE SMITH has no right and no place telling me anything
about Lyme borreliosis at all. I would request of the court to find
out more about her and whether or not she is appropriately placed at
DMHAS. It’s bad enough that the medical doctors at CVH are 100%
incompetent to brain matters. I wonder under what delusion Alice
Smith believes she has any authority to tell me anything about Lyme
disease. Where are ALICE SMITH’s Lyme websites with all the
scientific articles links and scanned in? Where is her testimony on
the FDA’s website about how Yale’s LYMErix vaccine was a complete
fraud?
The testimony of anyone from DMHAS or Yale in any criminal or DCF
“case” in Connecticut may now be thrown out, due to a complete loss
of integrity/credibility of their “forensic testimony.”
V. INCOMPETENCE, CRIMINAL SCIENTIFIC FRAUD and RACKETEERING by YALE
UNIVERSITY- LYMErix and the testing for Lyme disease
Yale University owns the patent for an early and accurate (94.4%) and
close to 100% specific test for Lyme borreliosis. That patent number
is US Pat No. 5,618,533 and was applied for in Dec 1993. Yale also
owns the patent for LYMErix (US Pat No. 5,747,294). Yale did not use
their early and accurate 5,618,533 test for Lyme borreliosis to assess
the outcome of LYMErix because 4 days after they applied for a patent
for LYMErix, Yale sent for publication a scientific article in which
they explained how LYMErix would not work.
In the body of the patent for Yale’s early and accurate test for Lyme
disease, they claim:
“The neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease are protean and include
weakness, peripheral nerve palsy, radiculitis, meningitis and
encephalitis. …”
“Antibodies to the B. burgdorferi flagellin antigen remain prominent
in patient serum during infection, and local CSF antibody production
to spirochetal antigens, including flagellin, occurs. Further, the
sera from patients with neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease have
IgM antibodies that bind human axons; binding is weak or absent in
patients without neurologic disease. The presence of high antibody
titers in the CSF correlates with clinical signs of
neuroborreliosis. ..”
This means that this antibody, the 41 kilodalton flagellin antibody,
is not only accurate, early, and made nearly 100% specific by Yale’s
further refinement (the actual claim of the patent is for the
specificity of their flagellin fragment), Yale suspects it might be
involved in the neurological disease process.
Therefore, for anyone at Yale or DMHAS to claim that Lyme is not a
brain and nerve disease, under oath and in court, as part of forensic
testimony, one would expect that expert witness to also demonstrate
where a brain cell is not a nerve cell. This did not occur in any of
my famously perjuring prosecutions- in the false criminal charges
“case,” and in the DCF “case.”
The State of Connecticut is 100% incompetent to brain matters. No
staff member of DCF, DMHAS, or the Department of Health explained to
the FDA how Yale’s LYMErix vaccine was not proven to be a vaccine. I
did.
IV. INCOMPETENCE and PERJURY of YALE FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY
Vladimir Coric, James Phillips
The fact that Yale knows how to perform a valid mental evaluation
James Phillips gave me every kind of psychotropic that there is,
except for the ProVigil that I asked for initially, in Sep 2000, to
increase daytime alertness (June 2000 to Dec 2002). Lyme
neuroborreliosis is a CNS infection and causes delirium, demonstrated
by brain imaging. Instead, Phillips gave me more brain damage which
was evident to all, in a large public forum, in January 2001, since I
was intensely pacing (the brain damage known as akathisia) and body-
rocking at the FDA meeting in Bethesda (Jan 2001). After causing
significant extra brain damage to the point where I could not even sit
in the summer of 2002, and after 10 different medications, Phillips
said, “I think you need to be on medication, I just don’t know what
kind.” Two and a half years after asking for ProVigil, and putting up
with all of his nonsense, he finally decided to look into what Lyme
disease is, after I had been talking about Lyme for 2.5 years, and
discussing specific markers of neurotoxicity. Then when he knew I was
going to sue him for malpractice, he perjured himself and told people
I was “unstable.” Unstable is exactly how a person with psychotropics
looks. Body rocking and intense pacing is subjectively felt agitation
and feels like you have butterflies in your stomach, 24/7.
Therefore the point of all of this abuse of myself and my children was
to blame me for Phillips’ malpractice, rather than Phillips is sued
for malpractice. I lost my children and went to jail on totally false
criminal charges to prevent a malpractice lawsuit against a Yale
clinical professor of Psychiatry and forensic Psychiatrist for the
State. There is no question I was talking about Lyme as a brain
disease the entire time, and I put up two websites while his patient
one in Nov 2000 and one in 2001. Both websites mention markers of
disease in this brain infection, Lyme borreliosis. I was falsely
blamed for Phillips’ malpractice by Jessica Gauvin and all of her
perjuring witnesses.
All of this abuse of myself and my children was the result of seeing
“the most incompetent psychiatrist who ever lived,” who I stated I was
seeing because of abuse by Carolyn Martin and not because of Lyme
disease. Thus, because of the abuse of Carolyn Martin, my children
are now with the well-known and extensively documented child-abuser,
wife-beater, and sociopath, Donald G. Dickson.
Extrapolated as perjury were my discussions to Phillips about how the
Lyme delirium manifests. This is not psychosis- these are reduced
consciousness signs (known to Lyme patients as “sleep-driving,” or
“Lymenesia,” and know to Lyme experts as Lyme delirium). Gauvin
presented it as psychosis because she knew I was going to sue Phillips
for malpractice. I was not allowed to refute this perjury. My lawyer
Peter Bartinik did not have me refute any of the perjury in my DCF
“case.” I found out after I was released from CVH - after allegedly
being “restored to competency” - that one is supposed to refute the
perjury in one’s trial. Bartinik never told me this, nor did I learn
it from CVH in “competency restoration.” This was never discussed
once. I read about it after I got out of prison. So much for hiring
a lawyer and “competency restoration.” Competency restoration at CVH
is, in fact, where they threaten you to take the plea bargain, or you
will be committed permanently and the State will take all of your
assets and income to pay for your treatment for a State prosecutor’s
psychosis. This is what I learned in DMHAS’ competency restoration.
DMHAS has been found incompetent by the feds and is being sued by the
OPAPD for being incompetent.
All residents of Connecticut should hereby be advised to give a
potential competency evaluation and intelligence test to any
psychiatrist before paying them a cent. I have found not one
psychiatrist yet, who is fully competent to brain matters in the State
of Connecticut.
The perjury of Yale’s VLADIMIR CORIC and “The Case of the Missing
Kathleen Martin (Dickson) Records from the 1980s,” was about helping
JAMES PHILLIPS not being liable for his chronic malpractice treatment
of me. Phillips gave me exactly 3 bottles of tranquilizers to use as
needed from 1980 to 1985, when I saw him on and off for my child abuse
by CAROLYN MARTIN - which James Phillips and I never discussed. Later
this child-abusing CAROLYN MARTIN (55 Easy Street Milford, CT)
physically and verbally abused my own children and invented for me
that I, “threatened to slit my own throat.” Carolyn Martin and NANCY
MARTIN (21 Redstone Way, Farmington, CT) were not arrested by the
psychotic JESSICA GAUVIN because obviously Gauvin likes that kind of
psychosis, being a participant in it herself.
Coric stated for the perjury-record-of-the-court that I was treated
with antipsychotics for 5 years. Had that been the case, I would
surely never have become a chemist due to the brain shrinkage
associated with chronic antipsychotic use:
1: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;59(11):1002-10.
Related Articles, Links
Click here to read
Brain volume changes in first-episode schizophrenia: a 1-year follow-
up study.
Cahn W, Hulshoff Pol HE, Lems EB, van Haren NE, Schnack HG, van der
Linden JA, Schothorst PF, van Engeland H, Kahn RS.
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht,
Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
w.c...@psych.azu.nl
BACKGROUND: Imaging studies of patients with schizophrenia have
demonstrated that brain abnormalities are largely confined to
decreases in gray matter volume and enlargement of the lateral and
third ventricles. Global gray matter volume has been reported to
progressively decrease in childhood-onset and chronic schizophrenia.
Global gray matter volumes have not been examined longitudinally in
patients with first-episode schizophrenia. One would expect global
gray matter to decrease progressively, particularly in first-episode
patients, because clinical deterioration is greatest in the early
stages of the disease. METHODS: Patients with first-episode
schizophrenia who had taken antipsychotic medication for 0 to 16 weeks
(n = 34) and matched healthy comparison subjects (n = 36) were
included in the study. For all subjects, magnetic resonance imaging
scans of the whole brain were obtained at inclusion and after 1 year
(mean [SD], 12.7 [1.1] months). Outcome was measured 2 years after
inclusion. To compare morphological changes over time between patients
and healthy comparison subjects, multiple repeated-measures analyses
of variance were conducted with intracranial volume as a covariate.
Outcome and cumulative antipsychotic medication were related to
changes in patients' brain volumes. RESULTS: Total brain volume
(-1.2%) and gray matter volume of the cerebrum (-2.9%) significantly
decreased and lateral ventricle volume significantly increased (7.7%)
in patients. The decrease in global gray matter volume significantly
correlated with outcome and, independently of that, with higher
cumulative dosage of antipsychotic medication. CONCLUSIONS: The loss
of global gray matter in schizophrenia is progressive, occurs at an
early stage of the illness, and is related to the disease process and
antipsychotic medication.
PMID: 12418933 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
The malpractice treatment of an organic delirium compounds this
neurotoxicity.
No one can anyone expect to acquire any kind of medical or mental
health assistance in this state with this astronomical incompetence.
A nearly 8% brain total brain cell lose as a “treatment,” is not a
treatment in the full medical sense of “treatment” being about
recovery.
The following report shows that Yale University is aware of the valid
parameters of mental assessment, but with their logic-disconnect where
one cannot give a DSM diagnosis when one has made these other valid
genetic and trauma rule outs:
1: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004;32(4):408-29.
Related Articles, Links
Click here to read
Ethics questions raised by the neuropsychiatric, neuropsychological,
educational, developmental, and family characteristics of 18 juveniles
awaiting execution in Texas.
Lewis DO, Yeager CA, Blake P, Bard B, Strenziok M.
Yale University Child Study Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
doroth...@yale.edu
Eighteen males condemned to death in Texas for homicides committed
prior to the defendants' 18th birthdays received systematic
psychiatric, neurologic, neuropsychological, and educational
assessments, and all available medical, psychological, educational,
social, and family data were reviewed. Six subjects began life with
potentially compromised central nervous system (CNS) function (e.g.,
prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome). All but one experienced
serious head traumas in childhood and adolescence. All subjects
evaluated neurologically and neuropsychologically had signs of
prefrontal cortical dysfunction. Neuropsychological testing was more
sensitive to executive dysfunction than neurologic examination.
Fifteen (83%) had signs, symptoms, and histories consistent with
bipolar spectrum, schizoaffective spectrum, or hypomanic disorders.
Two subjects were intellectually limited, and one suffered from
parasomnias and dissociation. All but one came from extremely
violent and/or abusive families in which mental illness was prevalent
in multiple generations. Implications regarding the ethics involved in
matters of culpability and mitigation are considered.
PMID: 15704627 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
To repeat:
1) All but one experienced serious head traumas in childhood and
adolescence.
2) All subjects evaluated neurologically and neuropsychologically had
signs of prefrontal cortical dysfunction
3) All but one came from extremely violent and/or abusive families
Almost all of them had genetic and traumatic brain compromise. None
had an actual current medical rule-out such as a spinal fluid analysis
or any kind of brain imaging. These actions would have completed the
picture and would have been something these analysts could have
presented to the court and said,
“Here’s how we don’t need to kill these children who have already been
severely injured and are validly intellectually compromised. We can’t
account for intent under these valid axes of compromise. To claim
intent on the part of these alleged murdering children would be
similar to us saying that ‘all persons who drive under the influence
of alcohol do so to deliberately hit people with their cars. ‘ The
perception and cognition of these children is validly off-base. Based
on our findings, we make the following recommendations for their
treatment and recovery: Validate their traumas, assess for organic
illness, adapt a special education protocol because they are children
and deserve an education rather than the sensory deprivation they get
in prison, and especially, children are inherently incompetent. We
know this because we are physicians. Youth is just that. We don’t
give children under the age of 16 drivers’ licenses and we don’t ask 5
year olds to authorize their own medical treatment…”
Most of the children in that study had a history of genetic and
traumatic compromise, and in which, even according to the DSM-IV, one
cannot make a diagnosis of a mental illness such as Bipolar when these
and other valid parameters of a medical history are present.
Similarly, one cannot diagnose Bipolar in a person who has Lyme or
Multiple Sclerosis. It says so right in the DSM, and according to an
NIH study of rapid-cycling bipolar in children:
Ruling out Lyme disease in Bipolar disorder in children and
Adolescents:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/gui/show/NCT00006177?order=1
Study ID Numbers 000198; 00-M-0198
ClinicalTrials.gov
skipnav
Home
|
Search
|
Browse
|
Resources
|
Help
|
What's New
|
About
r
Symptoms and Causes of Bipolar Disorder in Children and Adolescents
This study is currently recruiting patients.
Sponsored by
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to learn more about and describe the
moods and behaviors of children with bipolar disorder. This study will
also examine what happens in the brain to produce these moods and
behaviors. This is not a treatment study; children will not receive
any new or experimental therapies
Children and adolescents ages 6 through 17 with bipolar disorder and
normal healthy volunteers (controls) of the same age group may
participate in this study. Candidates will have a telephone interview
and review of medical records to determine eligibility. Additional
screening will include a medical and psychiatric history of the
patient and extended family members, and a physical and neurological
evaluation. The medical history interviews will be videotaped and kept
confidential.
Study participants will have a 3-day baseline evaluation, including
the following physiologic tests and procedures:
1. Questionnaires and interviews about the subject's mood and
behavior, stressful family events, and so forth, and observation and
documentation of the subject's behavior twice daily by clinical staff.
2. Computer and written tests to assess intelligence, memory,
learning, motor skills, reaction time, and planning skills.
3. Tests to measure heart rate, sweating, brain wave activity and
eyeblinking while watching film clips that elicit various emotions and
while playing computer games. Recordings include electromyogram,
electrooculogram, heart rate, skin conductance, and
electroencephalogram.
4. Needlestick to collect 3 tablespoons of blood to measure blood
count and thyroid levels, liver and kidney function, to test the
immune system and check for certain diseases, such as Lyme disease.
5. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain….
This clinical trial excludes people who have Lyme disease because one
cannot be given a diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder in the presence
of a central nervous system disease. Therefore, if it is for me to
be making these claims and valid arguments demonstrating the
incompetence, fraud, and perjury of all of the State of CT employees
and Yale employees, one cannot expect a good outcome of State of
Connecticut interference in the lives of the unassuming victims of
this relentless crime and incompetence being performed in the name of
the State of Connecticut.
The child in question, Ms. Figueroa, should have the option of being
transferred out of State to a competent facility where they understand
brain matters, psychotropics-induced brain damage, and understand that
one has to validate a child’s traumas.
Ms. Figueroa was removed from her parents unwillingly as a child by
DCF and learned how to fight to survive. Having been there (in
prison) and seen the things that go on in the prison, and being a
pharmaceutical scientist, I can validly claim that no child has a
chance in hell to survive the abuse of the DCF and that most of DCF’s
victims end up in the prisons anyway. Connecticut is hell.
Where is the population of DCF “success stories” claiming they were
indeed rescued by the DCF and their lives improved?
It doesn’t exist.
VI. OUTRAGEOUSLY STUPID LIARS: DCF, NANCY MARTIN, and JAMES PHILLIPS
There is not one thing that is the truth in the DCF “records” of
myself, and my family. It is as though these DCF people are from
another universe. I have never seen anything so bizarre as DCF’s
“records.” Lie after lie after lie after lie after lie. My ex-
husband, DONALD G. DICKSON, who is a certified “sociopath” and who had
been physically violent to me (arrest, restraining order, Battered
Women’s shelter), and the children, had been filing false allegations
for years. Donald Dickson told the DCF I intended to drive my
children into a lake in June of 2002. Nearly a year and a half later,
DCF decided to kidnap my children because I continued to file
complaints about the idiots of the DCF and scanned in their ridiculous
lying nonsense into my website for the whole world to see, to expose
the crimes they commit, for the benefit of public safety. Such lying,
retarded, lunatics should never be in charge of other people’s
children. Donald Dickson left my children with me for 3 weeks this
summer because he knew I would never kill the children - because he
made up that allegation himself. No one in Connecticut has ever be
criminally charged with filing false allegations, and neither the
Middletown court, nor the State’s Attorney’s Office in Milford knew
whose job it was to prosecute false allegations because, they told me,
it had never been done before.
My sister, Nancy E. Martin, who is a marriage and family therapist and
is on an e-list with me regarding “Microbes and Mental Health,” filed
such bizarre and false allegations against me, and continuously, and
again as perjury in my DCF “trial,” and at the depositions, that I am
certain this woman, Nancy E. Martin (21 Redstone Way, Farmington, CT)
is severely mentally ill.
Nancy Martin attended 2 Lyme conferences with me, one in New York City
in 1998 and another in Farmington in 2001, yet in all her bizarre and
false allegations she never mentioned I was sick with Lyme disease. I
had no idea, after reading and listening to this series of lies, that
she actually had hated me that much, for that long.
Nancy Martin told the DCF I had “Bipolar,” when she knew the first
rule out for Bipolar was Lyme disease from the elist, MMI. The proof
of this was all entered in my DCF “trial,” but the incompetent
“judge” (John C. Driscoll) never looked at any of the evidence. Nancy
Martin told the DCF I was having conversations about my grandparents
as if they were alive in 1977. They all had been dead for 12 years by
1977, so that conversation only took place in Nancy Martin’s bizarre
imagination. Nancy Martin told the DCF that I, “left my children on a
street corner and was nowhere to be found for several days.” The
street corner was my mother’s house where I had permission to leave
the children any time I needed to, when I was too sick from Lyme
disease to care for them. The DCF refused to help me TWICE, in 1996
and in 1998, with this babysitting care, yet they perjured themselves
(DCF’s Lorraine Thomas) about that in my DCF “trial.”
I had been corresponding with Nancy Martin that entire weekend I was
“nowhere to be found for several days” over an article in the
newspaper. I had the Norwalk virus on top of Lyme disease in 2002,
from around January 25 to the 30th. The Norwalk virus comes with an
extreme headache. That would be: an extreme headache added to the
chronic encephalitic migraine headache of Lyme neuroborreliosis. My
kids were fighting. The whole house was shaking. The kids would not
stop fighting. The whole house was shaking. I told the kids to pack
a few overnight things, because I was taking them to Grandma, because
they would not stop trying to kill each other while I tried to lie
down with the headache. The evidence and the facts that prove this is
true were entered as evidence in my DCF “trial.” The judge (John C.
Driscoll) never looked at any of the evidence submitted. My case
would have been a case where, from the 88 million dollars that the DCF
defrauded the federal government in TANF funds, the DCF could have
paid a babysitter for me for a few hours. Instead we had to have this
catastrophe of incompetence, false arrest, a traumatizing kidnapping
and my kids doing worse, and not seeing an infectious diseases
specialist.
I would like to know how much the DCF spent on abusing my family
altogether as a reward for my helping to get a dangerous vaccine off
the market, being a Lyme activist and helping to get legislation
passed to protect the rights of patients’ and Lyme treating
physicians’ access to care, and protection from harassment from Yale
and insurance companies who have committed this fraud as regards the
testing for Lyme and the bogus Lyme vaccine, in three states (New
York, Rhode Island, & Connecticut) - because I had no choice, because
no one would ever help me when I asked.
Nancy Martin was conspiring with an eleven year old relative to say
awful things about my children, as if this woman, Nancy Martin, had no
other focus in her life except to conspire to lie about me and my
children, even with an eleven year old Special Ed kid. This is not a
guess, I saw an email from Nancy Martin to the child.
Nancy Martin falsely told the DCF that I was the cause of this eleven
year old’s bad grades, when the child had always had bad grades, had
always had Special Ed. The school wanted to diagnose the child with
Childhood Schizophrenia because of the obvious paranoia and thought
disorder, which the guidance counselors had long been tracking. The
child was in the 6th grade, reading at the mid-3rd grade level and
with no use of phonics and with only a limited sight vocabulary.
Nancy Martin never helped that child, but I did, in fact, help the
child in a 504 meeting, and to obtain more Special Ed hours for her.
Therefore, I was actually helping this child, while Nancy Martin, the
Marriage and Family Therapist, was not only not helping, but making
matters worse for the child. Nancy Martin was teaching this child to
lie and be paranoid. Nancy Martin was actually teaching this child
more lying and paranoia skills to get by in life. The lying and
paranoia as survival skills, were taught to Nancy Martin by her mother
Carolyn Martin (55 Easy Street, Milford, CT). Carolyn Martin invented
for me that I showed up at her house and “threatened to slit my own
throat.” No such thing happened. Not even close.
The child needed special care, and Nancy Martin is a Marriage and
Family Therapist, has had three husbands, and has no children. One
wonders 1) is this nonsense what goes on in the “minds” of all “social
workers?” and “therapists?” and 2) how does one get a diploma and a
degree in Marriage and Family Therapy when they themselves are clearly
evil, thought-disordered, and psychotic?
Nancy Martin continued to perjure and delude herself, and said I,
“nearly flew out the window,” after my father’s funeral. No such
thing happened. I merely asked who wrote the eulogy because it
stunk. I needn’t have asked, since if the eulogy was impossibly
stupid, only one person could have written it- someone who is a
narcissist and has no idea that eulogies are supposed to be about the
deceased: Nancy Martin.
Nancy Martin further made false statements to the DCF and said I
yelled at Carolyn Martin in the hospital while my father was dying
(May 2002). I yelled at Nancy Martin for never letting anyone else
express an opinion, stating that my brother and other sister were not
happy with this rude and obnoxious behavior of hers. Nancy Martin at
that point started to cry, so there is no mistaking that Nancy Martin
deliberately lied to the DCF. We have Carolyn Martin stating in the
depositions that it was Nancy Martin who I confronted about her rude
behavior towards myself and my other siblings. Nancy Martin indeed
has a thought disorder, she could never keep any of the information
straight regarding my father’s health, and it was obvious. Every
morning I had to come in to the hospital and unscramble the status of
my father for my mother, because Nancy had everything mixed up and
confused. One wonders how in the world could Nancy Martin be any kind
of a counselor with such an obvious thought disorder?
The same is true with the DCF staff. These are off-the-charts stupid
people. They do nothing but lie. Lie after lie after lie after lie.
I would have to spend the rest of my life straightening out all these
DCF “records.” There is no truth or reality in any of it.
Since that is the case, the same must be true of all DCF’s “records.”
In fact, my children and I overheard another family of DCF victims
say, “How’d THAT get in there, that’s ANOTHER lie!” in the New Haven
DCF office.
All the DCF does is lie. The State has to know this because otherwise
they can’t try to manage all the children who the DCF are clearly
incompetent to managing.
DCF’s “records” are utterly useless and far beyond reality. One DCF
moron worker wanted to know how serious Lyme disease was after I had
already given her the scientific information, and AFTER, she had told
me her dog and grandfather died of Lyme disease. I suggested if she
wanted to find out if Lyme was easily diagnosed and cured, then she
could go to the cemetery and see of her grandfather had improved.
OUTRAGEOUS LIARS AND INCREDIBLY STUPID people are managing other
people’s kidnapped children. Rowland bragged about a 445% increase in
children taken from their parents under his administration. The bills
for this abuse-as-federal-income were written by Kristine Ragaglia and
Marc S. Ryan. I have sued the State of Connecticut twice, and one
suit is a class action (CA-5-328-Torres, in the District of Rhode
Island).
I am a Lyme disease activist and a scientist, and the very people who
I asked for help from, and who refused, were later the perjurers and
filers of false allegations in my DCF “case:” I asked DCF-twice (1996
and 1998), I asked Governor John G. Rowland, the Stonington Schools,
my “family” (Nancy Martin- who has no kids), and the Department of
Social Services in Norwich, and the State of Connecticut in a public
hearing on Lyme disease. My kids have congenital Lyme. One of them
also tests positive for Ehrlichiosis. None of my children are being
treated for Lyme, and my sickest kid has not been going to school
because she is afraid of being kidnapped by the DCF again from the
school, as she was on Nov 26, 2003. November 26, 2003 was 5 days
after depositions, where we learned Nancy Martin should have been
arrested for filing false allegations. AAG Jessica Gauvin should have
arrested her. Nancy Martin further under-whelmed the lawyers with
her intellect at the depositions by stating that I was an
“irresponsible parent” because I “go to the library.” I later learned
that no one had ever been charged with filing false allegations to
DCF, and that no one (either the Middletown court, or the State’s
Attorney’s Office), knew whose job it was to criminally charge persons
who file false allegations.
This would have been a case of clearly and deliberately filing false
allegations. Nancy Martin continued to lie and perjure to avoid being
prosecuted for filing false allegations. Nancy Martin is licensed by
the State of CT and knows I have Lyme disease. Nancy Martin knows
what Lyme disease is, since she herself had Chronic Fatigue and Immune
Dysfunction Syndrome (Lyme and CFIDS are identical), her illness is
what got her interested in counseling people with chronic illnesses in
the first place, and she advertises is her expertise in “therapy.” I
have never run across a better example of a “total nutcase”in my
entire life and she is my sister.
Nancy Martin is fully aware that “Lyme disease” is scientific fraud
and racketeering. In January 2001, I explained to the FDA vaccine
committee on LYMErix how Yale’s LYMErix was not a vaccine, according
to FDA rules and LYMErix came off the market a year later. It was
never a vaccine. It never was shown to prevent Lyme disease. I filed
a scientific fraud and racketeering complaint to the US Attorney in
2003, naming Yale as central to the fraud. The cover pages of the
RICO complaint are scanned into my website. There are 5 boxes of data
now in the US Attorney’s office regarding this FRAUD, Lyme disease and
LYMErix. All Yale staff were the ones who determined I am insane.
There is no excuse for this behavior of Nancy Martin’s because she was
on a daily email list called MMI sine the Fall of 1999, and which is
about the problems people with Lyme disease have. This email list
(MMI) is hosted and managed by Robert C. Bransfield, MD, who is a
psychiatrist and whose website is http://www.mentalhealthandillness.com,
and which is listed at the top of James Phillips’ records on page 4,
from the summer of 2000. I invited Phillips to the MMI conference at
the annual Psychiatric Services conference in the Fall of 2000 to hear
Bransfield and others involved in discovering how brain infections
such as Lyme borreliosis might be misdiagnosed as “mental illnesses.”
Phillips wasn’t interested in learning anything. After two and a
half years of not listening to me, and after denying me ProVigil for
alertness initially in Sep 2000, Phillips in the interim gave me every
kind of psychotropic that there is, gave me a movement disorder right
away (akathisia) and then two years later said, “I think you need to
be on medication, I just don’t know what kind,” in December 2002. At
that point I was fully aware that I was dealing with a complete idiot
and our conversations had taken place in a reality vacuum- Phillips’
reality vacuum.
Phillips is a forensic psychiatrist for the State, perjurer and “the
most incompetent psychiatrist who ever lived.” His world is sex, and
always was. In the Fall of 2004 Phillips gave a presentation in
Germany- still talking about Freud and “psychosexual development,” as
if nothing else happens in the world. Pity his poor wife. Phillips
is also an allegedly religious person and philosopher. One can
conclude that even at the highest levels of alleged intelligence, is
perversion and logical disconnect. How can one be a religious person,
lifelong student of philosophy, and perjure himself to avoid a
malpractice lawsuit? Reality is science. The science says Lyme is a
permanent brain infection. Science and reality leave the courtroom
whenever a “psychiatric expert” enters it. No one even knows how to
challenge the validity of a psychiatric diagnosis in a courtroom.
There are no witnesses to these court ordered psychiatric evaluations,
and no one can challenge whether or not the dialogue occurred as
reported by the “analyst.” Such was the case with Vladimir Coric and
Patricia Leebens, as previously mentioned. All three are psychiatric
perjuring nutcases who make things up and call their made up nonsense
a “record.” Such situations never arise in analytical chemistry
labs. For someone so obsessed with sex, one would expect that person
to demonstrate he actually has male gonads - act like a man - and
admit he lied and “screwed up.” Now we all know what to expect from
Freudians; they can’t connect penis with testicles despite having to
look at this connection every single day of their lives. Truth is
something they hide from because sex and one’s own imagination is so
much more rewarding than actually helping someone with their valid,
everyday-life, reality-complaints, such as the abuse of Lyme victims
by Yale.
VIII. PATRICIA LEEBENS DEFRAUDS THE COURT AND THEN LEAVES THE COUNTRY
Patricia Leebens of Yale and DCF wrote the Order of Custody of my
children and then “left the country” and could not be cross-examined.
I have never met Patricia Leebens, nor have I ever seen her. She
defrauded the court with her OTC. Her OTC looks the opposite of my
complaint to the Statewide Bar Counsel and Commission on Human Rights-
a 3 inch thick databinder dated 11-160-03 and left in the office of
Laura Lustig Nov 20, 2003. Lustig is a DCF lying-moron trainer.
Leebens mentions this 11-16-2003 databinder in page one of her custody
order of my children, but she defrauded the court over its contents.
Leebens and the DCF were hoping I would never have a trial. When we
went to enter this Nov 16, 2003 databinder in my DCF “trial,” AAG
Jessica Gauvin dropped her objection, and said “I didn’t see that!!”
after I threatened to subpoena RICHARD BLUMENTHAL or the US ATTORNEY
KEVIN O’CONNOR to come and tell us what was the content of that
databinder.
Gauvin most certainly did “see that.” It was on page one of the Order
of Custody, which was probably written by Gauvin and not Leebens.
Gauvin is a classic nutcase, perjurer, liar, and fraud, and ordered my
false arrest to prevent going to jail herself on March 25, 2004. I
was not allowed a “criminal” trial, because I was threatened that if I
did not plead guilty, I would be committed permanently and the State
of CT would take my house and all of my assets to pay for Jessica
Gauvin’s psychosis. I did not have any legal representation. The
records of this bizarre excuse for justice are in this New Britain
court house.
IX. “NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND” and the DCF’s DEFRAUDING the FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT OVER TANF FUNDS
The United States of America through the US Department of Social
Services and the Agency for Children and Families have given tens of
millions to the CT DCF to distribute to needy families, under
TEMPORARY AID FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF funds). The CT DCF defrauded
the United States to the tune of 88 million dollars of that TANF money
in one year alone (2003). This aid did not go to the families; it
went into the pockets of the Organized Crime and Racketeering
Influenced Enterprise known as the CT Department of Children and
Families. Meanwhile the CT Attorney General Richard Blumenthal has
sued the federal government for asking for unfunded improvements in
educations performance under our brilliant President Bush’s
initiative, No Child Left Behind (NCLB).
I claim that DCF is a RICO entity because of the intimidation fraud
and harm they cause, in order not to be liable for their own crimes-
crimes I have already demonstrated and have proven to the DCF court.
That is, the proof is already in evidence in my DCF “case” – evidence
that Judge John C. Driscoll never looked at. The DCF is a RICO
entity because all psychotropics are brain damaging, DCF knows they
are, and the DCF falsely arrested me and threw me in jail, falsely
claiming that, for all intents and purposes, I am a terrorist instead
of a human rights activist. Their behavior could be called The
DCF-180-Degrees-from-Reality-Formula, since they are not even very
imaginative liars. They simply say what is the total opposite of the
truth about their victims, under oath, under affidavit, and as their
relentless perjury-record-of-the-“court.” Their abusive and criminal
treatment of me and my children and then the gag order not to
“criticize the government” demonstrates intent to maintain this RICO
enterprise, DCF, as it is.
This 180-Degrees-from-the-Truth-DCF-Formula is proven by the fact that
on the FDA’s website at this very moment is a document in which I say
to the FDA, “This vaccine should not be given to children, unless we
know what is making adults so sick.” Is this the behavior of a
Unibomber terrorist? According to the clearly criminally insane DCF,
it is.
If the 88 million dollars went to the needy families, perhaps
Connecticut would not have so many failing NCLB children. Most people
believe financial struggles for parents results in compromised child
care and thus, education outcomes. This week, a 54 year old
intoxicated grandfather was arrested for the inadvertent death of his
grandchild while under his care, while the mother worked. What if
some of that TANF money had gone to this working mother for a real
babysitter instead of the drunken grandfather?
The TANF money was earmarked by the federal government for needy
families. All of Connecticut residents are aware of DCF’s abundant
incompetence, but they are not aware of the fact that the DCF staff
are criminals, defraud the courts, lie to the police, lie about the
police, lie to everyone about their victims, tamper with witnesses
routinely, chronically defraud the United States and the taxpayers
from the other 49 states, their victims end up in the adult prisons -
demented from the psychotropics, the children are treated violently in
the children’s prisons, and 90% of them don’t belong in the clutches
of the criminally insane DCF. This is a racket. DCF does nothing but
kidnap and kid-drug, and have defrauded the federal government
hundreds of millions of dollars in an effort to cause this much harm
to children, to continue to do so, threw me in jail to shut me up,
gave me a gag order not to criticize the government, and invented my
insanity for me, because the DCF have no other skills except being
criminally insane and expert- and chronic- liars.
The CT DCF are simply about the processing of bodies. ‘Small bodies
and big bodies. ‘For pay. They throw parents in jail all the time
with false criminal charges when they don’t have a legitimate reason
to kidnap. Then, once the parent has been jailed on false criminal
charges, DCF takes the kids, because DCF has now invented that the
parent is a criminal. I have seen the DCF do this 6 times in the last
year. I know of 6 such specific cases where DCF filed false criminal
charges against parents.
The very day I filed a motion for an Administrative Review (March 25,
2004), the raging lunatic AAG Jessica Gauvin ordered my false arrest
in order to avoid going to jail herself, because I asked for Law
Enforcement to be present for this Administrative Review.
This is trafficking in humans and organized crime.
X. CONCLUSION
The women and girls are abused by the psychopathic prison guards-
after a significant portion of them have already been abused by the
DCF. Violence in the prison is survival because the guards will not
protect them and in fact, promote these fights.
Abuse should not be treated with abuse. The courts will not hear
this from DCF, Yale, or DMHAS Psychiatry, because the full platform of
Psychiatry is that the victim of abuse should get the diagnosis and
the subsequent brain damaging psychotropics “treatment.’
Therefore, representing all cases of abuse and mistreatment by
Psychiatry as a treatment for abuse, and as an incompetent and brain-
damaging “medical” practice, I bring to the court this Amicus. I have
an interest in the cessation of this abusive status quo. I had the
good luck of a genetic endowment that allowed me to survive this
insanity conducted against the residents of the State of Connecticut,
intact. I have a “very superior” performance IQ (visual-spatial
abilities), I am a scientist, and the visual cortex is the only area
of my brain that remains uncompromised in brain SPECT scan imaging.
In other words, I have all along been telling the truth about
everything. Men hate it when women are smarter than they are;
especially when women are smarter scientists. I am stating these
facts as a record for this court, because they is also a verifiable
record in my DCF “case” and were entered at the beginning of the DCF
“trial,” but the judge never looked at any of the evidence.
I was not aware that judges do not have to look at the evidence
submitted. I have not seen that written anywhere.
All persons in Connecticut should learn that CT judges do not have to
look at evidence.
My children are not safe and they are not happy and this DCF abuse and
interference had a significantly negative affect on their lives. My
children are the only children I know who get nothing under the
Christmas tree by their “father.” My son has still not gotten a
single thing for Christmas 2005 from his father, Donald G. Dickson.
My daughter is afraid of going to school and she is sick with Lyme
disease and Ehrlichiosis and none of my children are getting proper
medical treatment under Donald G. Dickson’s “care.” My children have
congenital Lyme disease, and the State of CT and Yale University do
not want it known to the public that this occurs, despite Yale having
been a participant in the autopsy of a newborn who they, Yale, stated
probably died as a result of the congenital Lyme brain damage.
Lyme is a borreliosis- a permanent brain infection. Some persons have
latent borreliosis and they are at risk for a dementia. Yale
committed scientific fraud as regards the testing for Lyme disease and
as regards their Lyme vaccine. The citizens of this state are not
protected against this fraud because the US Attorney KEVIN O’CONNOR is
an incompetent DCF-Rowlandgate appointee, whose wife worked in
Rowland’s legal office during the DCF-Rowlandgate crimes. Yale knows
Lyme is a brain disease, but they would prefer to destroy people than
help them with this illness, and most of all, help people to get an
early diagnosis via the use of their patented valid test: 5,618,533,
which is 94% accurate. In addition to the false arrest and fraudulent
removal of my children, the perjury to protect James Phillips from a
malpractice lawsuit, Jessica Gauvin and the DCF are guilty of
obstruction of justice as regards the RICO complaint against Yale
University. The psychiatric perjury committed against me must be
prosecuted.
As Friend of the Court, I request that this child be transferred to a
competent facility for a full evaluation: cognitive-genetic,
traumatic, and organic, and be placed in the care of competent people,
wherever they may be found, and which clearly won’t be in Connecticut,
and which will also clearly be far away from Yale University.
Certification
The above amicus and accompanying data given to Laura Lustig and
JESSICA GAUVIN in the fall and winter of 2003-2004 has been given to
the prosecution, the court, and the defense of Ms. Elsie Figueroa with
the intent that it applies to any child who is a victim of DCF, DMHAS,
Yale, or the Department of “Corrections.” All such criminal cases and
cases where the child suffered DCF-abuse, including psychotropics-
abuse, as a “treatment” for an alleged abuse, are inherently at least
doubly mitigated.
There is no one in the State of CT qualified to be a forensic
psychiatrist for the State, since so many of them have clearly
perjured themselves in my “cases.” Psychiatry is not a valid medical
practice and all psychotropics are brain damaging. I submit this
evidence to:
1) State’s Attorney’s Office
New Britain, CT
2) To be Entered for the Record of the Court in the case
3) Defense Attorney for Elsie Figueroa
4) The Hartford Courant newspaper
This _____
Day of February, 2006
---------------------------------------------
Kathleen
M. Dickson
23 Garden
Street
Pawcatuck,
CT 06379
http://www.geocities.com/kmdickson0308/lyme-dilemma.html
Cross Reference: The Class Action Civil Rights Abuses lawsuit against
the State of Connecticut, in the District of Rhode Island CA-05-328-
Torres, Providence RI, and 3:05-CV-91 (CFDroney), District of
Connecticut, Hartford, Dickson vs State of CT, et al.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci