Subject: Santa delivers the CDC Port-a-Potty with a big red ribbon and
bow!
Date: Dec 25, 2009 2:17 AM
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
See the ^^^ website for the links to the
hard data/scanned documents.
=========================
CDC lies to the public on their website:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncphi/disss/nndss/casedef/lyme_disease_1995.htm
They say the 1990 and the 1995 case definitions are identical, when
the 1995 case definition says nothing about "sequential" or "serial"
Western Blot samples to look for new and expanding IgM and IgG
antibodies (indicative of relapsing fever or, as Allen Steere says,
ongoing infection, or "the bug has not been killed by the
antibiotics."
And the 1990 case definition says nothing about the Dearborn criteria,
which is that one has to have late Lyme arthritis in a knee. Lyme
Borreliosis (or Lyme Relapsing Fever) was the older name/definition.
At Dearborn, Steere, et al, changed the definition to the untreatable
case - bad knee - and ignored/dropped all they/Steere knew about the
serology of Relapsing Fever, and completely dropped the discussion of
neuroborreliosis or the kind of Lyme that requires intravenous
ceftriaxone because meningitis requires intravenous ceftriaxone.
Here is the CDC's 1990 definition.
http://www.actionlyme.org/CDC_DOCUMENTS_1990.htm
It only says to perform serial or sequential Western Blots and it says
nothing about an ELISA, where the cut-off is "too many
antibodies." (See the RICO complaint, the Steere Chapter of Cryme
Disease, and "Steere-in-Europe," where Steere's graphics show you that
Steere cut out all the Lyme meningitis cases when setting the ELISA
cutoff.)
Here is the 1994/95 ("Dearborn") definition - it says you have to have
"late Lyme arthritis in a knee" in order to have "Lyme Disease." They
dropped all the IgM bands - the bands they once said to look for new
ones of, in subsequent Western Blots. In this new, 1994-5 standard -
the Dearborn standard - CDC did not recommend serial or sequential
Western Blots to look for new IgM and expanding IgG antibodies, which
was the 1990 diagnostic standard, and was Allen Steere's own previous
standard and observations.
Here is the RICO complaint to the USDOJ, which shows how one must have
"too many antibodies" in order to have "Lyme Disease.'"
So, are they stupid?
Yes. They were caught and then they tried to lie about it.
First we get rid of their ridiculous vaccine, and then we force the
CDC to lie to the public.
That is so frickin hilarious.
Who can trust them now?
Now everyone knows what Disease Control means. It means Control the
Information/Obscure the Facts. It has nothing to do with controlling
diseases, other than forcing their own patents onto the market.
Further proof of this were the failed HIV-Lyme and Tuberculosis-Lyme
vaccines.
Merry Christmas- I just handed you the CDC in a waste basket/
outhouse, where it always belonged.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci
‹ Previous | Next › | « Back to Sent
© 2009 EarthLink, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Members and visitors to the EarthLink Web site agree to abide by our
Policies and Agreements
EarthLink Privacy Policy