Forty Years of "Mandated Sexual Equality" (Second Wave Feminism)...What Good Has It Done?
Masculist
well being by feminism, usually meaning the second wavers, though not
exclusively, but there must be something good to come from it right?
I have racked my brain for years trying to think of something good
about feminism but come up empty handed. Even when I think I find
something good it turns out that the so called good thing would have
been better without feminism.
Can anyone help me out here? Maybe my mental block is due to the
incessant fighting with feminists and them whipping me to death for
most of my adult life. Us anti feminists need to stay positive and
fair, so pray tell, what good has feminism done?
Tom
Marcus Aurelius
in actuality, when women became electorally predominant in the late
1960's and early 1970's.
Women, at least American women, have little tolerance for any man who
has any self respect and/or character. They will, individually and
collectively, discriminate against, intimidate, and denigrate the
same. They seem to only tolerate base and weak men.
Surveys have demonstrated that American women seek out men for
marriage whom they can dominate in the same. They tend to stay married
to men whom they dominate. Women seem to only tolerate working with
men in the work place who are base and weak.
The correct strategic course for men to approach with regard to the
aforementioned, in my opinion, is to avoid all personal, business,
social, and economic contact with American women. They are much less
able to "surround and destroy" men individually and collectively if
they do the same. Further, in actuality, the very men that they
despise and attack are the ones (self respect and character) most
likely to defend them from being victimized. As a result, by avoiding
American women, men make them vulnerable to political, economic, and
other forms of attack. There are many individuals and groups who,
seeing that courageous men with character are not present to defend
these women, will initiate attacks against the same.
This tactic has both defensive and offensive characteristics,
therefore, which makes the same an effective tactic. Further, it
follows the strategic objective of "surrounding and disarming those
women", defeating them, who take an aggressive and unethical stance
towards men (feminists and other women firsters).
• Wherever the real power in a Government lies, there is the danger of
oppression. In our Governments, the real power lies in the majority of
the Community, and the invasion of private rights is chiefly to be
apprehended, not from the acts of Government contrary to the sense of
its constituents, but from acts in which the Government is the mere
instrument of the major number of the constituents. James Madison,
President of the United States
o Letter to Thomas Jefferson (1788-10-17)
Masculist
Not a rosy picture. It means disintegration before integration is
possible. You're probably right the way things look now. How
depressing though.
Tom
Society
"Marcus Aurelius" <alexan...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c3367b4e-5dfb-4e0b...@k15g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>
> [American women] seem to only tolerate base and weak men.
That's why 40% of U.S. births occur out of wedlock,
the divorce rate is so high, and so many women are
attracted to the animal magnetism of the Bad Boy, right?
The typical American woman doesn't "tolerate... weak men,"
she _uses_ them.
The following was intended as satire but exaggerating how some
American women treat men you call weak is just sooo difficult.
OPINION
But If We Started Dating It Would Ruin Our Friendship
Where I Ask You To Do Things And You Do Them
by Kimberly Pruitt. June 9, 2009 Issue 45-24
_The Onion_
<http://www.theonion.com/content/opinion/but_if_we_started_dating_it>
> Surveys have demonstrated that American women seek out
> men for marriage whom they can dominate in the same.
> They tend to stay married to men whom they dominate.
Care to link to some of these surveys? I haven't seen any
such surveys.
Rather, the desire for hypergamy by most women has not gone
away. As the Obamaconomy's job losses continue to grow,
watch for a rise in the number of divorces.
--
[H]eaven forfend you should point out that certain feminists
are just shrews with a fancy philosophical excuse--then they
unleash the worst insult they can think of: you must be gay.
And all of this is usually accompanied by a shrill steady blast
of four letter words and other verbal savagery--anything
to scare away nasty reality and keep their discredited
worldview intact.
Andrew Klavan
"Attack of the Leftist Hate Monkeys!"
_Pajamas Media_, Klavan on the Culture
June 29, 2009
<http://pajamasmedia.com/andrewklavan/2009/06/29/attack-of-the-leftist-hate-monkeys/#comments>
Masculist
> "Marcus Aurelius" <alexander...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3367b4e-5dfb-4e0b...@k15g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > [American women] seem to only tolerate base and weak men.
>
> That's why 40% of U.S. births occur out of wedlock,
> the divorce rate is so high, and so many women are
> attracted to the animal magnetism of the Bad Boy, right?
>
> The typical American woman doesn't "tolerate... weak men,"
> she _uses_ them.
The "bad boys" have no power and are actively oppressed by daddy
government so any woman chosing them for a mate not only has unlimited
power over them, but has the sympathy and support of daddy government.
> <http://pajamasmedia.com/andrewklavan/2009/06/29/attack-of-the-leftist...>
Here's the operative phrase in that article..."like the Wicked Witch
dispatching her flying monkeys". This kind of rhetorical devolution,
as well as across the board social devolution, is the direct result of
the enormous political power of one sex...female.
Tom
Day Brown
>> <http://pajamasmedia.com/andrewklavan/2009/06/29/attack-of-the-leftist...>
>
> Here's the operative phrase in that article..."like the Wicked Witch
> dispatching her flying monkeys". This kind of rhetorical devolution,
> as well as across the board social devolution, is the direct result of
> the enormous political power of one sex...female.
http://www.daybrown.org/eugenix/eugenix.htm
which I first composed a few years ago, but which is spreading...
Is based on the simple fact that ever since birth control, honorable men
have stayed faithful to wives who bore them no sons, and are now out of
the gene pools. Meanwhile, for a couple generations now, the charming
philanderers have sired bastards to be raised on welfare all over the
county. Which is why case loads are going thru the roof.
Dr. Laura:"Well, you picked him honey." Yes, but what do women now have
to pick FROM? The smart ones have figured that out, and increasingly are
going to fertility clinics to select from among thousands of more
promising Y chromosome lines than in the balls of posters here.
And now, the technology allows them to determine the sex, so they'll
only give birth to the.... Uberwench. So- as I outline in Eugenix, it
wont be just political, but vastly increased economic power also.
There aint a goddamn thing men can do, and ranting here may make you
feel better, but is utterly pointless.
Masculist
> Masculist wrote:
> >> <http://pajamasmedia.com/andrewklavan/2009/06/29/attack-of-the-leftist...>
>
> > Here's the operative phrase in that article..."like the Wicked Witch
> > dispatching her flying monkeys". This kind of rhetorical devolution,
> > as well as across the board social devolution, is the direct result of
> > the enormous political power of one sex...female.
>
> which I first composed a few years ago, but which is spreading...
>
> Is based on the simple fact that ever since birth control, honorable men
> have stayed faithful to wives who bore them no sons, and are now out of
> the gene pools. Meanwhile, for a couple generations now, the charming
> philanderers have sired bastards to be raised on welfare all over the
> county. Which is why case loads are going thru the roof.
>
> Dr. Laura:"Well, you picked him honey." Yes, but what do women now have
> to pick FROM? The smart ones have figured that out, and increasingly are
> going to fertility clinics to select from among thousands of more
> promising Y chromosome lines than in the balls of posters here.
>
> And now, the technology allows them to determine the sex, so they'll
> only give birth to the.... Uberwench. So- as I outline in Eugenix, it
> wont be just political, but vastly increased economic power also.
>
> There aint a goddamn thing men can do, and ranting here may make you
> feel better, but is utterly pointless.
Don't worry Day, we will win. We have to or there won't be any human
race left. God won't allow that.
Tom
Day Brown
> Don't worry Day, we will win. We have to or there won't be any human
> race left. God won't allow that.
concept of god is dead. Note how he's been taken out of context. Classic
for the followers of Levantine religions.
Religions are always modeled on the power structure. So, when the alpha
male warrior elite took over in the late bronze age, the goddesses were
replaced with alpha male tyrant gods like you have in mind.
But now, Smith & Wesson guarantee equal rights for women, who still have
cunts, and they are learning to use them to form alliances with men who
see they dont have a chance in the struggle to alpha male top status.
And who see a much lower cost of management with women. And already, I
have met young women who get it, gave up the church, and worship the
Great Earth Mother. Give us the old time religion.
Now, I can see many alpha male warrior elites will not go quietly into
that good nite; terrorism is one of the results. But while they can tear
down a system, they cant offer, and have not proposed, a new system to
replace it with. You cant rebuild civilization with a bunker.
You got yours stocked? So, in the worst case scenario, what will there
be when you come out? One think I know is already happening in my neck
of Ozark woods is a communal hideout... established by women. No man I
know of has ever been there. I do know the general area, it is very
challenging to even find, much less assault. That's if you get past all
the bunker boys between there and the Interstate.
Another funny thing about those backwoods, is that because the roads and
transportation to hospitals was so difficult, midwives have never gone
out of business. So, they'll have that service as well, and no problem
in getting sperm donation when they want it.
And, if the proverbial SHTF, women will vastly prefer a community run by
women so they wont have to prostitute themselves or their daughters to
get support. And when other women find out about this, the guys with
harems will wake up dead.