Re: penis blasted off with firecrackers
wis...@yahoo.com
<Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>A Russian woman got so upset by the news that her boyfriend intended to
>leave her that she tied several firecrackers to his penis and exploded them,
>the Life.ru web-site reports.
>The 33-year-old victim, identified as Alik D. had lived with the woman whose
>name was reported as Kira V. for about two years, but when the girlfriend
>started suggesting that they should marry, the man refused and said that he
>would rather return to his first wife with whom he had a son.
>When Alik started moving out Kira suggested that they had a farewell dinner.
>After a hearty meal and some heavy drinking Alik fell asleep. The girlfriend
>tied several firecrackers to Alik's penis and exploded them. The man was
>rushed to intensive care and doctors are reported to be fighting for his
>life.
>Even if the man survives the girl will face up to 12 years imprisonment.
She was creative, most just use the "Bobbit" method. I suggest that if
you are in a tumultuous relationship learn to sleep with one eye open.
ted
Sean_M...@yahoo.com
I'm curious to see if she does equal time.
If she does, the anti Russian demagoguery will increase.
Society
<Sean_M...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:70976a34-82af-4040...@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
>
> "Heinrich" wrote:
> >
> > A Russian woman [identified only as Kira V.] got so upset
> > by the news that her boyfriend intended to leave her
> > that she tied several firecrackers to his penis and exploded
> > rushed to intensive care and doctors are reported to be
>
> She was creative, most just use the "Bobbit" method.
Both methods are violent. Neither are "cute," tho' sadly there
are many who talk that way.
> I suggest that if you are in a tumultuous relationship
> learn to sleep with one eye open.
Women who behave as though they believe that they own
someone else's body are too common. Perhaps that explains
the insistence of feminist women that before women's lib,
women were men's property (even when that wasn't so);
those women could be projecting _their_ attitudes toward
men onto men.
(follow-ups trimmed to soc.men, alt.feminism)
--
There is a popular T-shirt, poster, coffee-mug theme
that is often seen these days: "Caution! I go from
0 to BITCH in 2.0 seconds. AND the bitch switch sticks".
This is both a threat of, and an invitation to,
violence. ... What makes THE BITCH so reprehensible
is that the violence is only effective when it exploits
an emotional bond and thus is a violation of the most
basic requirement for a relationship: trust.
THE BITCH'S power is greatest against those who care
about her and care what she thinks of them. Everyone
else can simply shrug it off and go - "CRAZY BITCH".
Only those who she betrays are really affected.
Imagine the reaction of women to that same saying
changed only slightly, retaining the full meaning and
violent intent: "Caution! I go from 0 to FIST in 2.0
seconds. AND the fist is a repeater."
"THE BITCH" by Zed the Zen Priest
<http://web.archive.org/web/20050302095945/http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/3951/bitch.html>
Day Brown
> Women who behave as though they believe that they own
> someone else's body are too common. Perhaps that explains
> the insistence of feminist women that before women's lib,
> women were men's property (even when that wasn't so);
> those women could be projecting _their_ attitudes toward
> men onto men.
>
> (follow-ups trimmed to soc.men, alt.feminism)
are disempowered, that will become passe.
Sean_M...@yahoo.com
> Society wrote:
> > Women who behave as though they believe that they own
> > someone else's body are too common. Perhaps that explains
> > the insistence of feminist women that before women's lib,
> > women were men's property (even when that wasn't so);
> > those women could be projecting _their_ attitudes toward
> > men onto men.
>
> > (follow-ups trimmed to soc.men, alt.feminism)
>
> People owning other people was an alpha male invention.
No it wasn't.
White males did not invent the cosmos (its ways and means).
Therefore deconstructing them doesn't deconstruct the cosmos.
>As alphas
> are disempowered, that will become passe.
No it won't.
White males did not invent the cosmos (its ways and means).
Therefore deconstructing them doesn't deconstruct the cosmos.
Day Brown
> On May 31, 1:55 pm, Day Brown <dayhbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Society wrote:
>>> Women who behave as though they believe that they own
>>> someone else's body are too common. Perhaps that explains
>>> the insistence of feminist women that before women's lib,
>>> women were men's property (even when that wasn't so);
>>> those women could be projecting _their_ attitudes toward
>>> men onto men.
>>> (follow-ups trimmed to soc.men, alt.feminism)
>> People owning other people was an alpha male invention.
> No it wasn't.
tries to control others? Who has the instinct to want to dominate?
And who gets really angry when they lack the talent to succeed at it?
>
> White males did not invent the cosmos (its ways and means).
> Therefore deconstructing them doesn't deconstruct the cosmos.
>> As alphas are disempowered, that will become passe.
> No it won't.
>
> White males did not invent the cosmos (its ways and means).
Whatever gave you the idea alpha males are only white?
No, au contraire, its the higher proportion of beta males in the Native
European gene pool that aided their success. Other gene pools have too
many chiefs and not enuf Indians, so they cannot cooperate, are thus
divided, and then conquered.
> Therefore deconstructing them doesn't deconstruct the cosmos.
Classic alpha thinking that every comment refers to them. That too is
part of the reason women are taking over; they can see a little further
than their own egos. The smart ones anyway, which are the ones that are
moving up the power structures.