Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Hegmonic Feminism
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Jones  
View profile  
 More options May 27 2002, 9:30 am
Newsgroups: soc.men, alt.feminism
From: "John Jones" <enuffS...@nothanks.invalid>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 13:01:26 GMT
Local: Mon, May 27 2002 9:01 am
Subject: Hegmonic Feminism
http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/stories/bartlett052502.htm

Hegemonic Feminism

May 19, 2002

-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
by Edward E. Bartlett, Ph.D.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------

Psychologists have come up with a new epithet to describe men who
are too macho: "hegemonic masculinity." Like other concepts of
new-age psychology, psychologists can't really define "hegemonic
masculinity," but with a knowing smile, they say it has something
to do with the way that alpha males impose their way of thinking
on others.

So let's put the shoe on the other foot. Let's look at some
statements by feminists on the topic of marriage and
child-rearing:

"No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her
children. Society should be totally different. Women should not
have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice,
too many women will make that one." -- Simone de Beauvoir, quoted
in The Saturday Review, June 14, 1974, p. 18

"You become a semi-nonperson when you get married." -- Gloria
Steinem

Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of
contempt for women's bodies." -- Andrea Dworkin

Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that
the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this
institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the
abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronan

"Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to
serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a
choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to
change that." -- Vivian Gornick, University of Illinois, "The
Daily Illini," April 25, 1981

"The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition
for the liberation of women." -- from "The Declaration of
Feminism," November 1971

"In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away
from families and communally raise them." -- Dr. Mary Jo Bane,
associate director of the Wellesley College Center for Research
on Women

In the above statements, feminist leaders characterize housewives
as "non-persons" who are in an "illegitimate profession."

Both Simone de Beauvoir and Vivian Gornick explicitly call for
removing women's "choice" to be a homemaker. Two women forcefully
call for "the abolition of marriage" and "the end of the
institution of marriage." And Mary Jo Bane advocates the removal
of children from their mothers and fathers.

It is important to note that these feminists are not merely
advocating that women should have the option to pursue a career.
Rather, they denigrate women who want to get married and demonize
the concept of marriage.

In short, they are advocating the elimination of women's choice
to become a wife and mother. That's hegemonic feminism.

Edward E. Bartlett, Ph.D

-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Edward Bartlett is the administrator of
menshea...@yahoogroups.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rick Sobie  
View profile  
 More options May 27 2002, 10:13 pm
Newsgroups: soc.men, alt.feminism
From: Rick Sobie <rick_sobie_nos...@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 02:13:33 GMT
Local: Mon, May 27 2002 10:13 pm
Subject: Re: Hegmonic Feminism

Actually they are not so far wrong in their line of thinking because
almost anything at this point would be better than what we have now.

If two people love each other, why doo we need the law to keep
them together, when they can divorce anyway? The only benefactors
are the courts and the lawyers.

Children should be raised communally. Each community should have
disneyland-like care centers where children can be raised by
professional caregivers, and be allowed to play in a fantasy
world with other children. They do not want to play with their
parents. Get over yourself people. They want to play with people
their own age.

Parents would be able to pick them up and drop them off any time
they wanted.

That is how to break the cycles of abuse, and the cycles of
alcoholism, and all the other baggage we pass on to our children,
and they take to the bar with them.

Women work at a job, look after kids, clean house, drive them to ball,
take Prosac, get therapy, get MISERABLE AND BITCHY AS HELL, because
their burden is too great, and take it out on everyone else, making
society, this living hell, and these things we call family units,
dysfunctional war zones.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »