Does anybody know the answer?
Odin
thought and and the only explanation I can find is they aren't smart
enough to appreciate the complex melodies and
complicated rhythms. At roughtly the same time they were listening to
James Brown and
as you probably you could barely understand a word he uttered. Every
other 'word' was "HIGH"
Even today the most popular black performers, {I can't call them
artists} are the rappers preaching
anarchy and victory over the white race. Is it just natural that they
can't comprehend music with
intricate hooks and pleasing melodies? This isn't a racial thing.
After all, there's nothing wrong
with having inferior taste in music. But you would think the blacks
would listen to quality music for
a change and prove they deserve their new social status.
Skin...@hotmail.com
wrote:
One might say the same thing about your musical tastes. Do you listen
to Mozart? Chopin? Beethovan? Might someone of a classical music
background not say the exact same thing about you?
In your narrow, racially blurred view you completely forgot Jazz. How
many tremendous black ARTISTS have travelled that path? Or Blues,
which I might add INFLUENCED your Beatles music GREATLY!
Rap is a cultural thing my friend. It is spawned from the inner city
poverty and a lifestyle that has revolved around the exploitation of
drugs and violence. Many MANY whites also listen to rap as well so I
don't think you can hang the race card on this one.
Sad try too I might add. You might want to go back and brush up on
your race baiting technics. They really aren't very good you know.
E...@ix.com
> a change and prove they deserve their new social status.
Only us smart white peoples like good mucis.
Lady Veteran
wrote:
>Why don't black people listen to the Beatles?
How do you know they don't? Are you aware of every person's habits of
every time and every place? Generalities are the marks of idiots.
>I've given it a lot of
>thought and and the only explanation I can find is they aren't smart
>enough to appreciate the complex melodies and
>complicated rhythms.
You really don't get out much, do you?
> At roughtly the same time they were listening to
>James Brown and
>as you probably you could barely understand a word he uttered.
From a man who could have bought and sold you many times. He was a
talented musician who is a better credit to his culture than you are
to yours-for sure.
> Every
>other 'word' was "HIGH"
>Even today the most popular black performers, {I can't call them
>artists} are the rappers preaching
>anarchy and victory over the white race.
Overt racism is no better than the subtle kind. You wouldn't be angry
about being mistreated? It isn't right, but it is understandable.
> Is it just natural that they
>can't comprehend music with
>intricate hooks and pleasing melodies?
Again, generalities are for idiots.
>This isn't a racial thing.
Of course it is. You aren't saying "some blacks." you say "they." In
my estimation that means all people who call themselves African
American.
>After all, there's nothing wrong
>with having inferior taste in music.
According to whom? You? what and who are you that you need be pleased
above all others?
> But you would think the blacks
>would listen to quality music for
>a change and prove they deserve their new social status.
They deserve a good social status no matter what YOU think. Grow up.
LV
"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."
---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
"We are all born ignorant, but we must work hard to
remain stupid.
---Benjamin Franklin
----------------------------------------------
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity;
and I am not sure about the universe."
---Albert Einstein
----------------------------------------------
"Only the weak are cruel. Gentleness can only be expected
from the strong."
----Leo Buscaglia
---------------------------------------------
Are you being harassed on Usenet and want to fight
back instead of leaving the net? Are you willing to
stand up to Internet bullies and stalkers?
Join my group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiCHU
----------------------------------------------
"I am mad as hell and I will not take it anymore!"
---Network
Day Brown
Different gene pools have different sets of pattern recognition
subroutines. Africans are much more aware of rhythm and the complexity
of mixing them just as Europeans mix tone and melody.
A friend was a Jamaican congo player. He showed me how he'd play 4 beats
to the measure with his left hand on that drum, and do 3/measure with
the right simulaneously, but then kick in with both hands on the center
drum doing 7 beats/measure. When you hear it, its familiar, but you dont
recognize the complexity.
The Beatles hit on a combination of rhythm, melody, and harmony that fit
the sensibilities of their peers, that over time, became classic. We've
seen that before. Just as the Delta blues are a canon of art that is
well received everywhere from an otherwise obscure culture, so also, for
a thousand years or more, dancing girls and musicians from Kucha have
done well in China.
But Kucha, in NW China, was founded by Aryans 2500+ years ago, and has
been trading musical styles with China the whole time. There are some
neural patterns that resonate in the brains of both races, but its not a
matter of which is 'superior'.
The first Album by Crosby, Stills, & Nash was called "Helena"; its all
delta blues played by white guys. The "King Biscuit Hour" on the Helena
radio station gave the media attention that spread delta blues, and the
blues festival is still there.
And ya, I know some say it was all started by ignorant stupid field
niggers; as may be. But that did not prevent it from evolving, nor has
it prevented the Kuchi from integrating Beetle's riffs in Chinese tunes.
nied...@gmail.com
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:52:21 -0700 (PDT), Odin <warriorr...@yahoo.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Negroes are still mostly thumping logs.
en
Day Brown
who you know, were exported to the New World cause they were too stupid
to stay out of sight, and prolly pissed off some African chiefs who
wanted to get rid of the arrogant bastards.
Its worth noting as well, that there are only idigenous 7 mtDNA European
lines, but something ove 140 in Africa. Its a far more diverse gene pool
with many more aggressive jackass tribes. But its those who make the
news and the good video, while you never see anything about the peaceful
farmers.
And while a few shots from an Enfield did often scatter African warriors
like scared rabbits, you prolly dunno how the Zulu were able to stay
well organized and nearly cleaned the Brits clock cause they had the
same ignorant pre-judgment you express. Then too, during WWI, the
Germans in East Africa, with native Askari troops REPEATEDLY kicked ass
on British troops, and in fact had won their part of the war, despite
not being resupplied from Germany and often vastly outnumbered.
African musical heritage is also obscurely diverse, and while I'm sure
your characterization is often correct, the failure to see talent where
it does exist does not bode well for long term success. Hence the need
to put others down so you get to feel superior.
Scott Dorsey
Odin <warri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Why don't black people listen to the Beatles? I've given it a lot of
>thought and and the only explanation I can find is they aren't smart
>enough to appreciate the complex melodies and
>complicated rhythms.
This is foolish and misguided. Why, all black people listen to the
Beatles. Not only that, but Ringo Starr was black himself. His father
was born in Botswana and immigrated to England in 1950. A lot of people
think Ringo was a native Englishman because his skin is so light, but
that's only because he always dressed in black clothing (as on the cover
of With the Beatles), which made him seem so pale.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Odin
> In article <6571eb36-a9a0-4c2c...@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
> Odin <warri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Why don't black people listen to the Beatles? I've given it a lot of
> >thought and and the only explanation I can find is they aren't smart
> >enough to appreciate the complex melodies and
> >complicated rhythms.
>
> This is foolish and misguided. Why, all black people listen to the
> Beatles.
A load of crap.
Not only that, but Ringo Starr was black himself.
lol a humorous load of crap.
His father
> was born in Botswana and immigrated to England in 1950.
That doesn't mean he was a shitskin.
A lot of people
> think Ringo was a native Englishman because his skin is so light, but
> that's only because he always dressed in black clothing (as on the cover
> of With the Beatles), which made him seem so pale.
> --scott
What a buffoon.
The Nice Mean Man
Because they know the Beatles represent the top echelon when it comes
to the fuckers who stole their original creation and then went on to
do it better. And they hate them for it. Just like they hate them
because they're white. No other reason. Just black folks being
niggers. That's all. What else did you expect? Open-mindedness and
kindness?
TNMM
The Nice Mean Man
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:52:21 -0700 (PDT), Odin <warriorr...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >Why don't black people listen to the Beatles? I've given it a lot of
> >thought and and the only explanation I can find is they aren't smart
> >enough to appreciate the complex melodies and
> >complicated rhythms. At roughtly the same time they were listening to
> >James Brown and
> >as you probably you could barely understand a word he uttered. Every
> >other 'word' was "HIGH"
> >Even today the most popular black performers, {I can't call them
> >artists} are the rappers preaching
> >anarchy and victory over the white race. Is it just natural that they
> >can't comprehend music with
> >intricate hooks and pleasing melodies? This isn't a racial thing.
> >After all, there's nothing wrong
> >with having inferior taste in music. But you would think the blacks
> >would listen to quality music for
> >a change and prove they deserve their new social status.
>
> One might say the same thing about your musical tastes. Do you listen
> to Mozart? Chopin? Beethovan? Might someone of a classical music
> background not say the exact same thing about you?
>
No, but my parents do. And they're from the same race as me. Almost
ALL niggers dislike English rock in general and The Beatles in
particular. For the reasons that I've just layed out in the previous
reply in this thread.
It’s CULTURAL, you dumb-fuck PC-assd loser. Whites generally like
white-people’s music and blacks dig nigger music but hate all others.
As a rule. Generally speaking. 9 times outta 10. It’s okay! It’s an
openly acknowledged truth. You can admit it without getting into any
trouble!
The Nice Mean Man
Mr Wonderful
"The Nice Mean Man" <hither...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eb88156a-32fc-432c...@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
TNMM
I HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT WHICH ONE IS DUMBER, THIS WHITE TRASH BASTARD, OR THAT
WHITE TRASH BITCH, EDWINA HASKELL.
Lady Veteran
<hither...@aol.com> wrote:
A nice hell for you would to be born black in your next life.
Very fitting-then you can be the object of your own poison.
The Nice Mean Man
<mrwonder...@wtbtrainingacademy.com> wrote:
> "The Nice Mean Man" <hitherand...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:eb88156a-32fc-432c...@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dumb....? It's a fucking FACT. As any white person who's honest with
himself knows from the first day he meets one. Or has had the
displeasure of living near.
Niggers are dirty, lying, ugly, sloven, two-bit, hopeless, loveless,
inept, inferior, STUPID, evil, sub-human, theiving, murdering, raping,
looting, thoughtless, selfish, animalistic, barbaric, bottom-dwelling
black-skinned shit-hooks. There are very few 'good ones'. And the ones
that are good are hounded by the others. And you know this is the
truth. It's out there all of the time.
Nigger-loving piece of lying rat-shit. That's all you are. And
everybody here knows it. Even you.
TNMM
Day Brown
> Why don't black people listen to the Beatles? I've given it a lot of
> thought and and the only explanation I can find is they aren't smart
> enough to appreciate the complex melodies and
> complicated rhythms.
The Beatles is all in 3/4 or 4/4. I had a friend who was a reggae congo
player in New Orleans who showed me one time what he was doing.
With the left drum with his left hand, he was doing 3/4; with the right
drum, AT THE SAME TIME, with his right hand, he was doing 4/4, and the
middle drum, which he hit with either hand, that was going at 7/4. And
that's just a standard African riff. If you lived in New Orleans, you'd
know the sound, but wouldnt understand the subtlety behind it.
At roughtly the same time they were listening to
> James Brown and
> as you probably you could barely understand a word he uttered. Every
> other 'word' was "HIGH"
> Even today the most popular black performers, {I can't call them
> artists} are the rappers preaching
> anarchy and victory over the white race. Is it just natural that they
> can't comprehend music with
> intricate hooks and pleasing melodies? This isn't a racial thing.
> After all, there's nothing wrong
> with having inferior taste in music. But you would think the blacks
> would listen to quality music for
> a change and prove they deserve their new social status.
You are right. Its not racial. The Saami and Gypsy, if you look it up,
have the same kind of social statistics as niggers and spics. Divorce,
single moms on welfare, drunks, addicts, thieves, muggings and the same
low rates of education and income. Swedish & German socilogists also
report a curious walking gait- what we'd call a 'barrio swagger', an
ostentatious wardrobe for young men, who have trouble with authority
figures. Yet- they are just as white as you are.
Then too, in Farwell, "The Great War in Africa", when the Brits attacked
German East Africa, they expected the German led Askari troops to run
like niggers always do, but in this case, it was the Brits to did the
running. Time and again, despite being outnumbered up to ten to one,
they cleaned the clock on the Brits, and by the end of the war, had not
only beat the Brits, but also clobbered the Belgians and Portuguese and
took territory from both. Despite not being well supplied from Germany.
We also have the reports on how the Brits were nearly beat by the Zulu
when they expected the usual nigger disorganization. What's the diff
here? Its not skin color. The Saami, Gypsy, and most AFrican tribes are
hunters and/or nomads. The rest of the European tribes, the Askari and
Zulu were yeoman farming cultures. China, Japan, and Korea are all
descended from 12,000 years of agrarian village life, and when they
intermarry with Native Europeans who also descended from it, nobody in
either family worries about how the kids will turn out.
Aryans moved into what is now NW China 4000 years ago, and by the time
of the Chow, they together got the Silk Road up and running. And in the
documents they left, which were well preserved by the Taklamakan desert,
we see the mutual respect Tocharians and Chinese had for each other
despite the different skin color, and the disdain they both had for the
primitive barbaric nomadic Mongols, Sakyas, and Tibetans.
The Mongols, Tibetans, and Chinese all had the same skin color. Sakyas
are the ancestors of the same jackass tribes we now see in Iran and the
various x-stans. And in the Maitreysasmiti Texts in Tocharian A, from
the 5th century, we see they discuss the misogyny of these arrogant
jackasses who would pass for white in any American suburb.
To get the right answer, you havta ask the right question, and it is not
skin color, but whether the ancestry evolved in temperate zone agrarian
villages. Which had winters cold enuf to stop warfare. Jackass warriors
tend to suffer from cabin fever, and when that happens, if there is no
enemy to strike at, why then the wife and kids will do. Which filters
them out of the gene pool. In the tropics, warfare goes on all year. No
problem. The enemies are only a short hike thru the jungle.