Beth, Long Island
> When she wore that light green
>suite, she had on a pair of delicious
>black pumps
Along with those black pumps she was also wearing a white wrap-around shirt
that ties off at the waist and leaves the back bare. When she had the jacket
on it looks like a regular white shirt, then she takes off the jacket..... the
Edith Head fashion sense is seen!
A couple of months ago there was a thread about shirts similar to this being
available at the Limited etc this summer. Someone made the comment that it's a
trend and you probably wouldnt wear them next summer.
I had to chuckle to myself when I read it...those shirts are **totally**
classics thanks to Edith Head and Grace Kelly.
http://www.TheLoudounStylist.com
Wardrobe Consultant & Personal Shopper
userb3
On 18 Aug 2000 13:50:55 GMT, Beth wrote:
>I was watching Hitchcock's "Rear Window" last night, and was drooling over the
>clothes Grace Kelly wore, even the Mark Cross overnite case. I'm sure that
>many women would wear those clothes today. When she wore that light green
>suite, she had on a pair of delicious black pumps that you just don't see made
>anymore. Someone should make a pair of black pumps like that, I would buy
>several pair, they're a classic. I did a search and couldn't find out who the
>designers were of those breathtaking clothes. I have been interested in
>vintage clothing lately, I seem to be stuck in the 50's.
>
>
>Beth, Long Island
>
>
>
>
She was a Jung girl who was easily Freudened.
Oh my ... I was also lusting for that top -- too bad I missed The Limited's
knockoff. My favorite outfit is the black dress. The skirt is thinly-pleated
chiffon over a slip. That too, has made a revival this fall. Two similar skirts
(though in white) by Chanel and Jil Sander, are in the recent Vogue and Elle. I
got a BCBG knockoff at TJ Maxx three years back (for $8 to boot) and I LOVE
LOVE LOVE it
What is interesting is how Kelly's dresses were often accessorized with belts,
and this made all the difference. Chloe Sevigney belted her Oscar gown this
year, in an especially Edith Head-influenced move
Joanne.
"...all the men wore eyeliner and I thought they looked interesting, but they
weren't ... Anybody that looked interesting but who actually bored the pants
off you, should be prosecuted under the 'Trade Descriptions Act'" - Jarvis
Cocker
it's the edith head talent! hitchcock actually consulted on costuming for his
film, and the styles are just amazing. i'd take the white coat from 'vertigo'
anytime! 'edith head gives good fashion'.
But folks, let's not go overboard about Edith Head. She was extremely talented
and exceptionally good at what she did. That was design costumes and clothing
for the movies. It requires a special talent and there are a lot of
considerations. There's the scene, the background, the actress's body (what do
we need to hide), the overall feel of the film and the story. It's a lot more
complicated than it might appear on the surface.
As a clothing designer I don't believe Edith Head is considered terribly
important outside of Hollywood. Virtually everything she did was derivative,
and simply reflective of what other designers had done (or were doing) and the
fashion of the time. And you couldn't buy her clothes.
The movies have a huge impact on what people wear, or want to wear. Clueless &
Pretty woman are two recent examples of films that had a huge impact on
fashion. American Gigolo put Armani on the map. The halter dress that Marilyn
Monroe wore standing on that grate in the Seven Year Itch is the best selling
single style of dress in history. Bloomingdale's brings it back in some form or
other about every two years and it always sells out.
Please understand I don't want diminish Ms Head's talent. But there were other
costume designers who came out of Hollywood and had a far greater impact on
fashion.
Here are a few that come to mind.
Irene worked in the '50s and was a fabulous designer. You could buy her clothes.
Gilbert Adrian did all those fabulous costumes for the great MGM musicals. He
ranks among the best in history -- right up there with Charles James & Claire
McCardell in terms of important American designers. We can't leave Bonnie Cashin
off the list. She did the costuming for the first King & I and dressed Jean
Tierney in Laura (what a killer film that is). Bonnie is still influencing
fashion today. Among other things she did the original Coach bag everyone loves
and still buys. Oleg Cassini got his start in Hollywood and later became know as
Jackie's designer of choice.
Interestingly, as far back as I can remember, (and that's pretty far most days)
you'd almost get the feeling Edith Head was the only costume designer in
Hollywood. Maybe it's because she was the only name everybody new.
joel
>The movies have a huge impact on what people wear, or want to wear. Clueless
>&
>Pretty woman are two recent examples of films that had a huge impact on
>fashion.
==========
Perhaps is presumptuous of me to drop into a thread having read only Joel's
post, and nothing more of alt fashion for over a year...but....nobody ever said
I wasn't presumptuous.
Joel, how could you not recall your favorite former tie peddler's influence on
fashion, via "Annie Hall"? (no need to answer that....I know how forgettable
you think he is...!)
Another costume designer whose influence filtered from screen to street was
Theodora Van Runkle, particularly for "Bonnie and Clyde"....berets, maxi
skirts, menswear for women.
Please excuse my thread intrusion if I've missed the point of the discussion :)
Back to ebay now...
Patsy
PFashion1...please do enter into these discussions at any time. They
are far more relevant to the newsgroup than the namecalling going on
in other threads.
The way I heard this one is, "Edith head gives good gown."
EMiriamD
"I cannot and will not cut my conscience to fit this year's fashions."
Lillian Hellman to House Un-American Activities Committee (1952)
The End.
Notice I said "recent" examples. By that I was referring to the "talkies" love.
Actually Bonnie & Clyde was huge. And yes indeed our old friend Ralph Lipshitz
really did have most of the women in America looking like shitz for a couple of
years after Annie Hall. It was kind of cute for the first 15 minutes.
Depressingly, Diane Keaten still dresses like that or at least she did a few years
back when I met her.
joel
joel
The beatnik scene in Funny Face is a really good example of how the eye adjusts.
(What's to come isn't criticism by the way. It's sort of a rhetorical observation
-- something to think about).
To the modern woman audrey's black turtleneck and Capris look incredibly chic.
That's because you're seeing clothes that aren't much different on the street and
in the local mall. The eye has adjusted and the look is accepted. While I see it
as pretty timeless -- I'm not sure everyone would agree.
So, I ask this rhetorical question: "Let's assume it's not Audrey Hepburn in that
outfit. Let's also assume it's 10 years ago or 10 years from now. Would it still
look chic? Would you wear it?"
My instincts tell me the answer is no. I had black capris in the shop 10 years ago
-- couldn't give 'em away. People thought they were a costume.
An interesting sidelight to that scene is that it's the white socks that make the
dance sequence really work. Audrey did not want to wear those white socks and
argued against wearing them. Fortunately for the film she lost that argument.
joel
kim wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Adrian was amazing. There was a recent article about him in Vanity Fair.
>
> also lets not forget Givency and Audrey Hepburn in Funny Face - didn't
> edith head try to take credit for designing all those amazing clothes?
> In addition to the gowns, I find the capri pants, turtleneck, and loafer
> ensemble audrey's character wore in her "beat" phase incredibly chic.
>
> Great movie for fashion, by the way. Also The Women, which has this crazy
> color fashion show in the middle of a black and white movie. Were the
> frames hand-tinted, or was it an early color-film process experiment?
>
> kc
>
> retro <re...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> snipped some
joel
Evidently white socks or a bit of white at the foor always makes
dancers look better. Or so I've read. Astaire often did and Michael
Jackson picked it up from him (if you all remember he wore silver
sparkly socks doing the "Billie Jean" era--and say what you will
about him as a person, he was an incredible dancer!).
--AJ
I think discussions of film fashion over the years are fun. I read the
biographical article about Adrian in Vanity Fair, and it was
fascinating. Sounded like a very classy man.
There are so many films which come to mind in which I think the costumes
are great. Anything Audrey Hepburn was in, of course -- which has
already been discussed here. To go back a bit farther, I love the way
Walter Plunkett dressed everyone -- in "Gone With the Wind." That red
dress Scarlett wears to Ashley's birthday party after she has been
caught alone with him. Stunning. I only wish Vivien Leigh wore it for
a longer scene -- you barely get time to see it. And of course, her
famous green velvet "drapery dress" that Carol Burnett satirized so
hilariously on her old television show. :-)
Speaking of Vivien Leigh, I have a question for the film fashion
afficionados out there. Are you familiar with her film "Waterloo
Bridge?" I have always found her costumes for this film to be
confusing. Isn't that film supposed to be set during World War I? (At
first, I thought it was WW II, because her clothes are not at all WW I
era. But then, the film begins with a flashback, and I think Robert
Taylor's "present time" is the WW II era. And then he thinks back to WW
I, when he met Vivien Leigh.)
Anyway. Every time I see this film, I actually find the costumes
distracting because I can't "place" them in an appropriate period. Not
a big deal, I know. :-) But still. Why wouldn't the designer have
made more of an effort to actually costume her so that the time frame of
the film would be more obvious?
Joel, I think in the scene where Audrey Hepburn comes down the staircase
is when she is wearing her gown for the Embassy Ball. But I haven't
seen that film in a while. I think, though, that she is seen in the
Ascot dress for the first time at Ascot. Whereas she is seen in the
Embassy Ball gown first the first time at Higgins' house, at the top of
the staircase. And to my (very untrained) eye, her Ascot costume is so
stylized that it looks like something Cecil Beaton would have created,
rather than "real" vintage. Might it have been her ballgown that was
possibly the "real thing?"
LW
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Joel, I think in the scene where Audrey Hepburn comes down the staircase is when she is wearing her gown for the Embassy Ball. But I haven't seen that film in a while. I think, though, that she is seen in the Ascot dress for the first time at Ascot. Whereas she is seen in the Embassy Ball gown first the first time at Higgins' house, at the top of the staircase. And to my (very untrained) eye, her Ascot costume is so stylized that it looks like something Cecil Beaton would have created, rather than "real" vintage. Might it have been her ballgown that was possibly the "real thing?" LW
I think you're correct. It has been awhile since I've seen the film
too. It must have been the gown she wore for the Embassy Ball. The Ascot
scene was so stylized that it would have required special costuming . Thanks
for picking up on that. Now it time for me to: "MOVE MY BLOOMIN' ASS."
joel
<snip>
>Speaking of Vivien Leigh, I have a question for the film fashion
>afficionados out there. Are you familiar with her film "Waterloo
>Bridge?" I have always found her costumes for this film to be
>confusing. Isn't that film supposed to be set during World War I? (At
>first, I thought it was WW II, because her clothes are not at all WW I
>era. But then, the film begins with a flashback, and I think Robert
>Taylor's "present time" is the WW II era. And then he thinks back to WW
>I, when he met Vivien Leigh.)
>
>Anyway. Every time I see this film, I actually find the costumes
>distracting because I can't "place" them in an appropriate period. Not
>a big deal, I know. :-) But still. Why wouldn't the designer have
>made more of an effort to actually costume her so that the time frame of
>the film would be more obvious
I haven't seen Waterloo Bridge for a long time, and the only thing that
bothered me, as I recall, was Robert Taylor's lack of a English accent.
I have a problem, time-wise, with the movie The Ghost and Mrs. Muir. It starts
in the early 1900s, and, near the end, looks 1930s, at the earliest. This is
impossible, since the daughter is at the most, in her early 20s. Still, it
Gene Tierney, Rex Harrison, and George Sanders are wonderful, and the seaside
setting and music are gorgeous.
BTW, re Audrey Hepburn and Funny Face: I've read that she wanted to wear dark
socks in the jazz dance number so she would have an unbroken line. The
director insisted on the white socks, and she later admitted he was right.
Emily
"Do it big, do it right, and do it with style." --Fred Astaire
(Please remove edit to reply by mail.)
RebeccaB.
Interesting trivia: the little child who plays Farrow's daughter
is Patsy Kensit.
--AJ
"RebBrooks" <rebb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000821002717...@ng-fi1.aol.com...
Thanks, Neat post.
joel
kim wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> A quote from "Cecil Beaton's Fair Lady", a diary-type book he kept of his
> experience on the film. taken without permission:
>
> "This afternoon Eliza's ball dress was pinned, in rough form, on a stand
> for the first time...Agnes (Koschin)has the responsibility of creating
> this gossamer shift. She started to cut the sequin, crystal, and chenille
> embroidery from a genuine 1910 evening gown which will be an invaluable
> guide for our embroideries."
>
> and:
>
> "Audrey appeared to be tested in her ballroom dress...The glistening ball
> dress is like ice on trees in Switzerland."
>
> kim
>
> lin...@mindspring.com wrote:
>
> snipped vivien leigh
> >
> > Joel, I think in the scene where Audrey Hepburn comes down the staircase
> > is when she is wearing her gown for the Embassy Ball. But I haven't
> > seen that film in a while. I think, though, that she is seen in the
> > Ascot dress for the first time at Ascot. Whereas she is seen in the
> > Embassy Ball gown first the first time at Higgins' house, at the top of
> > the staircase. And to my (very untrained) eye, her Ascot costume is so
> > stylized that it looks like something Cecil Beaton would have created,
> > rather than "real" vintage. Might it have been her ballgown that was
> > possibly the "real thing?"
> >
> > LW
> >
> >