> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Naughty Naughty" <nospam@> wrote in message
> news:Xns9870B0...@207.14.116.130...
>> "guess" <gu...@myisp.com> wrote in
>> news:OtGdnVQTnPGWStfY...@giganews.com:
>>
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>> "Professor NB" <%+11$-Y-...@here-and.there> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns987071...@207.14.116.130...
>>>> Ruddell <ruddell'Elle-Kabong'@canada.com> wrote in
>>>> news:0001HW.C16FD575...@news.sasktel.net:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:50:02 -0600, readandpostrosie wrote
>>>>> (in article <_kp2h.49092$IO2....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>):
>>>>>
>>>>>> i was appealing to psyko, because we share another newsgroup
>>>>>> together. i will stop now, it is apparent that psyko and friends
>>>>>> are going to continue with this juvenile crap.
>>>>>> thanks a bunch!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess Rosie this is the worst vacation I've ever seen a ng take.
>>>>> It's been done before of course but I've never seen it done in
>>>>> such poor taste and usually, they get bored with it quicker than
>>>>> these people have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eventually they'll go and I agree with you about juvenile crap.
>>>>> Kids will be kids and they'll find another playground.
>>>>>
>>>>> AF has probably been around longer than most of these kooks...
>>>>
>>>> alt.fashion was created by Steve Frampton in late May 1992.
>>>>
>>>> The first troll in this group was in fact the very first post made
>>>> to this group, which was cross-posted from alt.support.diet which
>>>> was titled "Fashion for the Fat" by Robbie Felix. This post,
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/yzs9db
>>>>
>>>> which obviously could not have been older than the group itself
>>>> (duh! the group had to be created first!), actually predates the
>>>> welcome message from the group founder by 6 days.
>>>>
>>>> I personally have been on the net since before then, even though
>>>> I'm not a kook.
>>>>
>>>> I can stay here for as long as it takes for Joann to apologise. If
>>>> you don't like it here, I suggest you try and join their "thriving"
>>>> Yahoo group.
>>>>
>>>> NB
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am betting Robbie is older than the newsgroup unless he was
>>> posting as a newborn.
>>> These freaks on AF don't realize they are the bitches who destroy
>>> their own newsgroup.
>>> And I like Psyko, so there. :P
>>
>> Absolutely. The alt.fashion regulars are their own worst enemy.
>>
>> They are also weak.
>>
>> They have done nothing to try and reclaim their group from us trolls.
>>
>> I checked with my sysadmin and he has not even received one complaint
>> about me.
>>
>> NB
>
> I am not a troll. I am not trying to bait anyone. They are baiting
> me. If I do not like the ones that have been hateful and I say so,
> then the whiny bitches like David Gartner come back and whine and say,
> "I don't like you." Well, tough I say. If they cannot stick up for
> the one who is not hateful and want to side with a bunch of hateful
> bitches just so they can "belong" then that is what they will have to
> do. I am not selling my soul just to belong to a nothing group with a
> bunch of bitches who are no doubt best friends with the devil himself.
> These bitches who have wished me dead, libeled my children and taken
> it into real life, sending things to my home and faxing me and more, I
> have a right to do or say whatever I deem necessary to deal with these
> devils. You cannot be removed from your ISP for free speech and none
> of them have removed me from anything, even though they claim it.
> They however can be removed for their threats and libel but I am not a
> netkop so I have not reported them.
> The bitches on AF attract hateful people because they are hateful
> themselves. They are boring old hags and no one finds them
> interesting enough to even read AF anymore. At least I have people
> who think I make a place more exciting. I refuse to be bored in my
> life and succumb to some old haggy hateful bitches.
> They are not only evil bitches, they are netkkops, therefore kooks.
>
>
>
But Guess, my dear, how do you really feel?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> I agree with this post. I am, however, an inveterate troll. David
> Gartner is a chickenshit wimp, I am a real man and a soon as I
> challenged him he ran off with his tail between his legs like the
> girly man he is, and there is no doubt he is afraid of real women like
> you. They have gone off to their moderated Yahoo group, and as with
> all moderated Yahoo groups it will die a death from terminal boredom.
> Usenet is where the fun and challenge happens. People should learn how
> to use a killfile or ignore people they don't like.
>
> NB
>
And enjoy SPAM.
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "The Spaminator" <Meaty...@yuk.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns98707E55BE...@66.150.105.47...
> Guess. Nah, I am just pulling your can.
>
>
>
I don't think I've ever heard it called it that before.
Me either.. :( Won't somebody reprot me to teh web police please!!1!
--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
> "guess" <gu...@myisp.com> wrote in
> news:s7OdnQXdPo9nbNfY...@giganews.com:
>
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> "Naughty Naughty" <nospam@> wrote in message
>> I am not a troll. I am not trying to bait anyone. They are baiting
>> me. If I do not like the ones that have been hateful and I say so,
>> then the whiny bitches like David Gartner come back and whine and
>> say, "I don't like you." Well, tough I say. If they cannot stick up
>> for the one who is not hateful and want to side with a bunch of
>> hateful bitches just so they can "belong" then that is what they will
>> have to do. I am not selling my soul just to belong to a nothing
>> group with a bunch of bitches who are no doubt best friends with the
>> devil himself.
>> These bitches who have wished me dead, libeled my children and taken
>> it into real life, sending things to my home and faxing me and more,
>> I have a right to do or say whatever I deem necessary to deal with
>> these devils. You cannot be removed from your ISP for free speech and
>> none of them have removed me from anything, even though they claim
>> it. They however can be removed for their threats and libel but I am
>> not a netkop so I have not reported them.
>> The bitches on AF attract hateful people because they are hateful
>> themselves. They are boring old hags and no one finds them
>> interesting enough to even read AF anymore. At least I have people
>> who think I make a place more exciting. I refuse to be bored in my
>> life and succumb to some old haggy hateful bitches.
>> They are not only evil bitches, they are netkkops, therefore kooks.
>
> I agree with this post. I am, however, an inveterate troll. David
> Gartner is a chickenshit wimp, I am a real man and a soon as I
> challenged him he ran off with his tail between his legs like the
> girly man he is, and there is no doubt he is afraid of real women like
> you. They have gone off to their moderated Yahoo group, and as with
> all moderated Yahoo groups it will die a death from terminal boredom.
> Usenet is where the fun and challenge happens. People should learn how
> to use a killfile or ignore people they don't like.
>
> NB
>
This post is APPROVED!!
(and I'm not even a real troll!)
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Naughty Boy" <pffffft> wrote in message
> What David doesn't realize is that they are all talking about him
> behind his back, but being friendly to his face because they try to
> get people on their side. Behind the scenes I was defending him while
> they made fun of the hair pictures he would post, made fun of his
> boyfriend, said his house looked filthy, etc. I felt sorry for him.
That doesn't surprise me from what I've seen around here
>
> I did do something rather funny. They kept complaining to my ISP so I
> pretended to change ISPs, got my own domain, set it up like it was an
> Internet provider and gave an email address for abuse. I wanted to
> find out what they were complaining about firsthand. Oh, you cannot
> believe the sob story they told with so many lies. It was appalling,
> yet hilarious. I am too smart for them. They even got their husbands
> to email "the provider." It was so funny. Cofart was one of the
> biggest offenders. Diane Hardin too, I think Grace, but later she and
> I became friends. But what I was really surprised at was only about
> three women were complaining. According to them, ALL did not like me,
> but only three complained. It was rather revealing.
Classic bait and switch (or in this case, switch and bait?)
/me thinks you're a little rough around the edges, but with the proper
coaching you may just be HL&S material yet someday
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "ThePsyko" <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns98705BBEC9...@nntp.petitmorte.net...
> Oh boy. What's HL&S? Should I pack my bags?
>
>
>
Hook, Line and Sinker - It's when you fool somebody so completely that it
becomes it's own work of art.
Things like here -> http://tinyurl.com/yyp2h2
Where I fooled somebody so good, 3 different times, as 3 different people,
that I had him spinning in circles and publically admitting that he didn't
really believe what he was saying about somebody else..
Not to mention I got him to post my "personal" information that was all
wrong because I was the one secretly feeding it to him...
All that and I STILL didn't win HL&S (although I was nominated.. dunno why
I didn't win.. those were classic moments in usenet :)
*sniff* usenet sure isn't what it used to be :(
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "ThePsyko" <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns987063BDE1...@nntp.petitmorte.net...
> Well, I did do some other clever things. ;-)
> Usenet has gone crazy.
>
>
>
I have to ask you 2 questions now..
1) how long have you been a regular of alt.fashion?
and
2) am I a spammer?
I'm just curious ya know, because some people have informed me that they
have lost "all respect" for me and apparently I'm supposed to care...?
don't you love me?
David Gartner the limp-wristed male nurse? But...but...wasn't he your friend?
Weren't you bragging that he sent you Christmas cards the other day?
>Well, tough I say. If they cannot stick up for the one who is not hateful
>and want to side with a bunch of hateful bitches just so they can "belong"
>then that is what they will have to do. I am not selling my soul just to
>belong to a nothing group with a bunch of bitches who are no doubt best
>friends with the devil himself. These bitches who have wished me dead,
>libeled my children and taken it into real life, sending things to my home
>and faxing me and more, I have a right to do or say whatever I deem
>necessary to deal with these devils.
>You cannot be removed from your ISP for free speech and none of them have
>removed me from anything, even though they claim it. They however can be
>removed for their threats and libel but I am not a netkop so I have not
>reported them.
>The bitches on AF attract hateful people because they are hateful
>themselves. They are boring old hags and no one finds them interesting
>enough to even read AF anymore. At least I have people who think I make a
>place more exciting. I refuse to be bored in my life and succumb to some
>old haggy hateful bitches.
>They are not only evil bitches, they are netkkops, therefore kooks.
Those evil bitches! Do you have v00d00 dolls with pins stuck through
them for each one of those psycho kuntz?
Please stop feeding the trolls and do not spam here again.
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "ThePsyko" <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns98706925EC...@nntp.petitmorte.net...
> Of course I love you. You're a lovable guy. But, I am at AGC, not
> the evil AF.
>
>
>
Please stop feeding the troll and do not spam here again.
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "ThePsyko" <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns98706925EC...@nntp.petitmorte.net...
> Of course I love you. You're a lovable guy.
Shhh.. don't say that out loud - some people would disagree with that
statement.
> But, I am at AGC, not
> the evil AF.
That would explain why I only see some of your posts.. I try to avoid
subscribing to too many groups at a time :)
>I did do something rather funny. They kept complaining to my ISP so I
>pretended to change ISPs, got my own domain, set it up like it was an
>Internet provider and gave an email address for abuse. I wanted to find out
>what they were complaining about firsthand. Oh, you cannot believe the sob
>story they told with so many lies. It was appalling, yet hilarious. I am
>too smart for them. They even got their husbands to email "the provider."
>It was so funny. Cofart was one of the biggest offenders. Diane Hardin
>too, I think Grace, but later she and I became friends. But what I was
>really surprised at was only about three women were complaining. According
>to them, ALL did not like me, but only three complained. It was rather
>revealing.
Well . . . I am just shocked! Appalled! And dismayed.
I hope you didn't send those bitches any fruitcake for Christmas.
>x-no-archive: yes
>
David Gartner the limp-wristed male nurse? But...but...wasn't he your friend?
Weren't you bragging that he sent you Christmas cards the other day?
>Well, tough I say. If they cannot stick up for the one who is not hateful
>and want to side with a bunch of hateful bitches just so they can "belong"
>then that is what they will have to do. I am not selling my soul just to
>belong to a nothing group with a bunch of bitches who are no doubt best
>friends with the devil himself. These bitches who have wished me dead,
>libeled my children and taken it into real life, sending things to my home
>and faxing me and more, I have a right to do or say whatever I deem
>necessary to deal with these devils.
>You cannot be removed from your ISP for free speech and none of them have
>removed me from anything, even though they claim it. They however can be
>removed for their threats and libel but I am not a netkop so I have not
>reported them.
>The bitches on AF attract hateful people because they are hateful
>themselves. They are boring old hags and no one finds them interesting
>enough to even read AF anymore. At least I have people who think I make a
>place more exciting. I refuse to be bored in my life and succumb to some
>old haggy hateful bitches.
>They are not only evil bitches, they are netkkops, therefore kooks.
Those evil bitches! Do you have v00d00 dolls with pins stuck through
>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Naughty Boy" <pffffft> wrote in message
>news:Xns9870BF...@207.14.116.130...
>> "guess" <gu...@myisp.com> wrote in
>> news:s7OdnQXdPo9nbNfY...@giganews.com:
>>> "I don't like you." Well, tough I say. If they cannot stick up for
>>> the one who is not hateful and want to side with a bunch of hateful
>>> bitches just so they can "belong" then that is what they will have to
>>> do. I am not selling my soul just to belong to a nothing group with a
>>> bunch of bitches who are no doubt best friends with the devil himself.
>>> These bitches who have wished me dead, libeled my children and taken
>>> it into real life, sending things to my home and faxing me and more, I
>>> have a right to do or say whatever I deem necessary to deal with these
>>> devils. You cannot be removed from your ISP for free speech and none
>>> of them have removed me from anything, even though they claim it.
>>> They however can be removed for their threats and libel but I am not a
>>> netkop so I have not reported them.
>>> The bitches on AF attract hateful people because they are hateful
>>> themselves. They are boring old hags and no one finds them
>>> interesting enough to even read AF anymore. At least I have people
>>> who think I make a place more exciting. I refuse to be bored in my
>>> life and succumb to some old haggy hateful bitches.
>>> They are not only evil bitches, they are netkkops, therefore kooks.
>>
Awwww. That's so frustrating. You migh want to study the most
obnoxious posters, to learn how they stimulate anger.
Then go thou and do likewise.
You'll be fine. I sense potential.
HTH
Lily
> Lil...@webtv.net (Lily) wrote in news:29245-454C00F2-1384@storefull-
> 3215.bay.webtv.net:
> Potential? Potential? Potential?
>
> NB
>
damn... has the stinging stopped yet?
--
/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
>
> "Naughty Boy" <pffffft> wrote in message
> news:Xns9870BF...@207.14.116.130...
>> "guess" <gu...@myisp.com> wrote in
>> news:s7OdnQXdPo9nbNfY...@giganews.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "Naughty Naughty" <nospam@> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9870B0...@207.14.116.130...
>>>> "guess" <gu...@myisp.com> wrote in
>>>> news:OtGdnVQTnPGWStfY...@giganews.com:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I checked with my sysadmin and he has not even received one complaint
>>>> about me.
>>>>
>>>> NB
Do you mean you were the lurker that supported him in email?
> I did do something rather funny. They kept complaining to my ISP so I
> pretended to change ISPs, got my own domain, set it up like it was an
> Internet provider and gave an email address for abuse. I wanted to find out
> what they were complaining about firsthand.
Why? You said you don't care what people think about you, that they
aren't even real people. Were you lying when you said those things?
>Oh, you cannot believe the sob
> story they told with so many lies. It was appalling, yet hilarious. I am
> too smart for them. They even got their husbands to email "the provider."
> It was so funny. Cofart was one of the biggest offenders. Diane Hardin
> too, I think Grace, but later she and I became friends. But what I was
> really surprised at was only about three women were complaining. According
> to them, ALL did not like me, but only three complained. It was rather
> revealing.
Wow, so you lied to people to find out what they were saying about you,
all while posting publically that you didn't care what people said about
you. I'm impressed by that depth of integrity.
It is supporting you if someone replies to you without a condemnation.
>
>> I did do something rather funny. They kept complaining to my ISP so I
>> pretended to change ISPs, got my own domain, set it up like it was an
>> Internet provider and gave an email address for abuse. I wanted to find
>> out what they were complaining about firsthand.
>
> Why? You said you don't care what people think about you, that they
> aren't even real people. Were you lying when you said those things?
they are real people, but real bad people.
>
>>Oh, you cannot believe the sob story they told with so many lies. It was
>>appalling, yet hilarious. I am too smart for them. They even got their
>>husbands to email "the provider." It was so funny. Cofart was one of the
>>biggest offenders. Diane Hardin too, I think Grace, but later she and I
>>became friends. But what I was really surprised at was only about three
>>women were complaining. According to them, ALL did not like me, but only
>>three complained. It was rather revealing.
>
> Wow, so you lied to people to find out what they were saying about you,
> all while posting publically that you didn't care what people said about
> you. I'm impressed by that depth of integrity.
Your integrity is partially in all of your socks.