Proposal alt.games.half-life.counterstrike.cheats
Thermostat
<sven...@ntlworld.com> had not had the courage and decency to say:
>I think I speak for the group and 99% of the 'true' cs community when I say
>the cheaters can goto hell (or in this case the new group :o))
So this is a group just for you to say "piss off to the new newsgroup" every
time someone asks the cheats.
If you dont like cheating, killfile the word "cheat".
Creating a new newsfroup wont make cheaters go away.
--
Thermostat
Turn me up to toast some netcop ass
Thermostat
<sven...@ntlworld.com> had not had the courage and decency to say:
>In a previous posting you claimed to know about the game. If you do you
>should realise why. Plus it isn't in the chater and not welcome. Why not
>create a new group to keep everyone happy? The cheaters get the answers they
>require without flames and 'we' get left in peach to talk about what we
>will. Makes complete sense to me and it is justified as you have seen.
>Cheats are not part of the game as you claim. This is a multiplayer game ie.
>one that you play against humans and the designers didn't implement the
>cheats.
I understand what your saying, I hate it when people cheat in multiplayer
games, but creating a new newsgroup will not prevent people in CS cheating,
and when nobody answers the cheating questions on
alt.games.half-life.counterstrike.cheats they'll just come running back to
the main group.
There's no point.
Thermostat
<sven...@ntlworld.com> had not had the courage and decency to say:
>
>>
>> > Plus it isn't in the chater
>>
>> It's also not in the charter that you are allowed to talk about Bots is
>it?
>> Nevertheless you can talk about Bots, right?
>
>There isn't a law that says 'don't pinch your best mates girlfriend' none
>the less it is still societies law. People who do it are frowned upon.
>>
>> The charter is only there to explain the topic of a group and the topic of
>your
>> group is a game namedd Counterstrike.
>>
>> > and not welcome.
>>
>> Who decides that? Just because YOU don't like them means they are not
>welcome?
>> Nope, it only means that you and some others don't like them.
>
>No one decides it and you seem to be contradicing yourself. Who says I
>cannot therefore top post?
Fuckwit. You've proved his point, and whinge that he's "contradicting"
himself, even though he makes perfect sense to me, is it because we both
posess a clue and you dont?
>> > Why not create a new group to keep everyone happy?
>>
>> As this would mean that another thousand groups would have to be created
>for
>> every other game as well.
>
>And this is your problem?
That isn't the problem in itself. The problem is waiting an extra half an
hour for the newsgroups file to download because of thousands of joke groups
and groups that never get used.
>I wonder how any groups ever get created, people
>seem too quick to tell me why the groups I have proposed wont work. Has
>anyone in here EVER said hey that's a good idea go ahead? With a pat on the
>back?
You're using Demon, I'm expecting the lamest argument being a list of joke
groups that your fuckwit of a newsadmin added and a "whuy cant my newsgroup
be xcreated" whine. When do you plan to use this argument?
>> What's wrong with using a generic cheat group that was created for cheats
>about
>> every game? There aren't that many Counterstrike cheats that this would
>flood
>> such a group.
>
>People are looking for a counterstrike group therefore we get the posts.
And if a newsadmin doesn't create the cheats group then they'll still come
running to "your" newsgroup and piss you off further.
>> > The cheaters get the answers they
>> > require without flames
>>
>> Why do you flame them at all?
>> Learn to live with the fact that there are people who don't care for
>playing
>> games honestly.
>
>I don't flame them, although others do. I can live with that. I'm trying to
>stop the bitching about it that's all.
Encourage them to use their filters. Telling people to piss off and ask the
question in an empty newsgroup will just stir more shit.
>> > and 'we' get left in peach to talk about what we
>> > will.
>>
>> IOW because you are too lazy to use a killfile, people must go to another
>group
>> although their topic is on topic in your favorite group.
>
>Using a killfile wouldn't work as people still talk about cheats and there
>will be some posts I do want to see.
Fuckhead. Because *you* dont want to see those posts it means that they
should not be allowed to be posted within your sight? What if cheaters dont
want to see you lot discussing bots, should they create a newsfroup and tell
all of you to piss off there?
>Fact is if the group is created I will
>use it. You seem to be making many assumptions here. I don't dissagree with
>cheating.
Message-ID: <TWpE5.23771$uq5.4...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
"I think I speak for the group and 99% of the 'true' cs community when I say
the cheaters can goto hell (or in this case the new group :o))"
>> > Makes complete sense to me
>>
>> Just like top posting makes sense to you, right?
>
>Yes.
Fuckwit.
>> > and it is justified as you have seen.
>>
>> I've seen nothing that justifies anything.
>
>Then get reading.
I've read your proposal, but perhaps you could tell me what those deja
matches matched, exactly?
Thermostat
<moo...@my-deja.com> had not had the courage and decency to say:
>
>>
>> Is the group in agreement? It will require many users to request and
>> post to the new group.
>>
>
>Yes I am sick of wasting time scrolling through endless posts about
>cheating and all the flaming that follows.
>
Well use your killfile then, fuckwit.
Thermostat
<sven...@ntlworld.com> had not had the courage and decency to say:
>Thing is it wont keep em out. They are looking for counter strike and
>cheats. Those two words are in the name. I'm sure not many people know what
>a 'mod' is.
>
>Does that make sense?
No it doesn't
>--
>--Sven
>www.stagweekends.co.uk
>the man, the myth, a legend (in my own toilet time)
>sven...@ntlworld.com.REMOVE
>weed: five-7-nought-nought-9-eight-two-4
>www.pearson-jones.co.uk/aghlcs - AGHLCS FAQ
><>
>Please post your reply at the top , Thank you .
--
Thermostat
Turn me up to toast some netcop ass
<>
Please fuck yourself, Thank you .
Thermostat
<sven...@ntlworld.com> had not had the courage and decency to say:
>Precisely when people are looking for counterstrike would they search for
>half life?
If they had any idea what "thorough" means.
Perhaps alt.games.day-of-the-tentacle alt.games.dott and
alt.games.dayofthetentacle should be newgrouped in time for me to have
problems with the sound so that I can be a lazy asshole who cannot be fucked
to search for a newsfroup properly.