> > On Jul 4, 2:10 pm, jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jul 3, 11:42 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:

> >>> On Jul 3, 8:12 pm, jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>> On Jul 3, 6:18 pm, b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:

> >>>>> Not Sure  <fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>>>> On Jul 3, 2:58 pm, b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
> >>>>>>> emoneyjoe  <emoney...@iglou.com> wrote:

> >>>>>>>>       The article has a lot of insinuations, with no
> >>>>>>>> actual wrong doing mentioned.

> >>>>>>> It says Governor Flip-Flop Etch-A-Sketch has *12*
> >>>>>>> accounts in the Caymans and has consistently
> >>>>>>> *refused* to come clean about what's in them.

> >>>>>>> Here's the URL.  Read it and weep:

> >>>>>> So nothing in there about Romeny being a tax cheat. Thanks for doing
> >>>>>> ...

> >>>>> The entire article is about Romney being a tax cheat!  Here's
> >>>>> the full URL; readers are encouraged to read it for themselves:
> >>>>> <http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/08/investigating-mitt-romney-...>

> >>>>>      --bks

> >>>>> p.s. You should learn to spell your candidate's name

> >>>> The entire article is not about Romney being a tax cheat; it is an
> >>>> opinion piece with a lot of presumption and no proof.

> >>>> Romney "might" be a tax cheat, but the author of the opinion piece
> >>>> didn't prove it.  All he did was point to off shore investments.
> >>>> Having offshore investments is not proof of tax evasion or being a tax
> >>>> cheat.  I have off shore investments and I can assure you that I am
> >>>> not a tax cheat.

> >>> Don't get silly.  You have no offshore investments at all.

> >> Although it is not "off shore", one of my foreign investments is in
> >> your country.  It is involved in Canadian Oil Sands.

> > Bullshit.  You've got nothing in oil sands.  Go away.

> >> You would be an idiot if you invested your retirement portfolio in
> >> only one single country.

> > You have no portfolio.  Go away.

> >>>> Timothy [tax-cheat] Geithner IS a proven tax cheat.  Romney "might" be
> >>>> a tax cheat, but you should have the same level of proof before you
> >>>> make accusations about Romney.

> >>> Interesting that Romney is still holding off on releasing his tax
> >>> forms till October.  What's he got to hide?  Why October?  That won't
> >>> give people a lot of time to really scrutinize the doctored details,
> >>> especially if he decides to release them on Halloween.

> >> He has already released his 2010 tax return quit some time ago.  You
> >> can find it here:http://www.mittromney.com/learn/mitt/tax-return/2010/wmr-adr-return

> >> Have fun.  Why don't you used it to prove to the rest of us that
> >> Romney is a tax cheat?

> >> The 2011 tax returns are not are not due and most likely haven't been
> >> filed yet.  He has posted an estimate.

> >> NOW, you must have read the article that Bradley posted.  Since
> >> Bradley has failed to quote where the article proved that Romney is a
> >> tax cheat, why don't you try?

> > Your failure to understand the article is commendable for how
> > dumbfounded by it you come across.  The article was circling around
> > available data to arrive at possible explanations, not to prove or
> > disprove anything.  But it is interesting how something he has claimed
> > as being worth virtually nothing still manages to deliver millions
> > into his hands each year.  I've got a bunch of things that are worth
> > virtually nothing, now if I could only find a way to convert all those
> > pots and pans into millions, I'd be set for the rest of my life.

> Then why was it presented as *evidence* of scandal?