Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hussein SS Agent Caught Lusting After Sarah Palin. Would Like To Sniff Her Toilet Seat

92 views
Skip to first unread message

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:17:58 PM4/20/12
to
"The secret service suffered fresh damage to its already battered reputation
on Friday when it was disclosed that one of the agents involved in the
Colombia prostitution scandal posted pictures on Facebook of Sarah Palin
accompanied by a sexually suggestive comment."

"The security service supervisor, David Chaney, had been assigned to protect
her during the 2008 presidential campaign while she was John McCain's
vice-presidential running-mate."

"The photographs show Chaney in the background at a car door with Palin in
the foreground. In a comment under one of the pictures, Chaney wrote: "I was
really checking her out, if you know what I mean?""

"Palin, interviewed on Fox on Thursday night, responded angrily. "Well, this
agent who was kind of ridiculous there in posting pictures and comments
about checking someone out. Well check this out bodyguard: you're fired.""

Woo hoo!

You tell 'em, Sarah!

Woo hoo!

-Eddie Haskell


Joe Cool

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:29:15 PM4/20/12
to
Caught?!?!? HE posted the photo to his FB account and HE wrote the
comment that he was checking her out, far from lust, IMHO, you
pathetic clueless babbling fucking asshole moron.

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:49:50 PM4/20/12
to

"Joe Cool" <joeco...@live.com> wrote in message
news:c66f8a0b-8d9c-4cd1...@d20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
Damn, just look how pissed he got when I told him that one of members of
Hussein's SS got caught lusting after Sarah Palin.

How dare he! Not Sarah Palin! HAAA!!!

Hahahahahah!!!

-Eddie Haskell


Joe Cool

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 4:13:00 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 3:49 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <uyn...@szmoplm.com> wrote:
> "Joe Cool" <joecool1...@live.com> wrote in message
Pissed?!?!? Hardly, you pathetic, well you know.

2966 Dead

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 5:02:22 PM4/20/12
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:49:50 -0500, Eddie Haskell wrote:

> "Joe Cool" <joeco...@live.com> wrote in message
> news:c66f8a0b-8d9c-4cd1-822e-
ea1247...@d20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
If he actually HAD sniffed her toilet seat, why, he would have learned
everything you really need to know about Sarah Palin!





--
"You'll notice that I WON'T disavow Nugent." -- Fake Bill, because when
you're in the GOP, you just can't get enough violent pedos





--
"You'll notice that I WON'T disavow Nugent." -- Fake Bill, because when
you're in the GOP, you just can't get enough violent pedos

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 5:11:44 PM4/20/12
to

"2966 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:jmsiss$pht$5...@dont-email.me...
What, that her pussy smells like fresh lilacs in the morning dew?

-Eddie Haskell


2966 Dead

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 5:46:38 PM4/20/12
to
More like the sewer your brood mother littered in, I should think.
>
> -Eddie Haskell

Joe Cool

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 5:37:12 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 5:11 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <uyn...@szmoplm.com> wrote:
> "2966 Dead" <d...@gone.com> wrote in message
>
> news:jmsiss$pht$5...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:49:50 -0500, Eddie Haskell wrote:
>
> >> "Joe Cool" <joecool1...@live.com> wrote in message
> >> news:c66f8a0b-8d9c-4cd1-822e-
> > ea1247b46...@d20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
I suppose you have sniffed Palin's pussy?

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 5:58:35 PM4/20/12
to

"2966 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:jmslfq$pht$7...@dont-email.me...
Still pissed that she outed your death panels and was right all along, huh?

April 13, 2011 - The deficit-reduction plan unveiled by President Barack
Obama today strengthens a cost-control tool in healthcare reform that
organized medicine fears.

The savings mechanism is the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).
Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the IPAB will advise Congress on ways
to curb the per capita growth of Medicare spending if it exceeds growth-rate
targets set by the law.

If it does not implement IPAB recommendations, Congress must enact policies
that save just as much, or else let the Department of Health and Human
Services make the cuts.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/740830

Krugman explains:

"About that advisory board: We have to do something about health care costs,
which means that we have to find a way to start saying no. "

http://blogs.forbes.com/davidwhelan/2011/04/22/paul-krugman-reveals-his-hierarchy-of-medicine-patients-doctors-washington/

Hussein explains that Husseincare's cost cutting remedy is to deny seniors
vital procedures when deemed too old or unworthy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-dQfb8WQvo

-Eddie Haskell


Joe Cool

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:06:21 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 5:58 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <uyn...@szmoplm.com> wrote:
> "2966 Dead" <d...@gone.com> wrote in message
>
> news:jmslfq$pht$7...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:11:44 -0500, Eddie Haskell wrote:
>
> >> "2966 Dead" <d...@gone.com> wrote in message
> >>news:jmsiss$pht$5...@dont-email.me...
> >>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:49:50 -0500, Eddie Haskell wrote:
>
> >>>> "Joe Cool" <joecool1...@live.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:c66f8a0b-8d9c-4cd1-822e-
> >>> ea1247b46...@d20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
Death panels are a myth.

>
> April 13, 2011 - The deficit-reduction plan unveiled by President Barack
> Obama today strengthens a cost-control tool in healthcare reform that
> organized medicine fears.
>
> The savings mechanism is the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).
> Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the IPAB will advise Congress on ways
> to curb the per capita growth of Medicare spending if it exceeds growth-rate
> targets set by the law.
>
> If it does not implement IPAB recommendations, Congress must enact policies
> that save just as much, or else let the Department of Health and Human
> Services make the cuts.
>
> http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/740830
>
> Krugman explains:
>
> "About that advisory board: We have to do something about health care costs,
> which means that we have to find a way to start saying no. "
>
> http://blogs.forbes.com/davidwhelan/2011/04/22/paul-krugman-reveals-h...
>
> Hussein explains that Husseincare's cost cutting remedy is to deny seniors
> vital procedures when deemed too old or unworthy.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-dQfb8WQvo

Absolutely NO mention ANYWHERE of denying anyone any kind of health
care at all, you pathetic clueless babbling fucking asshole moron.

Steve

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:50:15 PM4/20/12
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:02:22 +0000 (UTC), 2966 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
Zepp and his ilk really hate women who are mose successful then they
are... in Zepp's case, that'd be almost all women.

Lamont Cranston

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 9:46:53 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 3:17 pm, "Eddie Haskell"<uyn...@szmoplm.com> wrote:

I fixed the subject line for you, felcher.

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 11:53:07 PM4/20/12
to
Who was president in 2008?

RT

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 12:33:35 AM4/24/12
to
Ref at


http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/04/09/460917/wisconsin-state-senator-money-less-important-wome/

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) quietly repealed his state’s equal pay law
last week, a decision that will make it harder for victims of wage
discrimination to sue for lost earnings and back wages. The law was enacted
primarily to address the massive pay gap that exists between male and female
workers, which is even bigger in Wisconsin than in other states.

Repealing the law was a no-brainer for state Sen. Glenn Grothman (R), who led
the effort because of his belief that pay discrimination is a myth driven by
liberal women’s groups. Ignoring multiple studies showing that the pay gap
exists, Grothman blamed females for prioritizing childrearing and homemaking
instead of money, saying, "Money is more important for men," ...


Typical right wing bastards.

RT

John Doe

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 1:32:48 AM4/24/12
to
Travesty, a disciple of the Church of an Ever Expanding Government...

RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <4F962D1F.9CD1EB3F hotmMOVEail.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:33:35 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
> Subject: GOP War on Women: Walker kills equal pay, 'cause men need the money more
> References: <HDikr.43532$wa3.17400 unlimited.newshosting.com> <4F922F23.5A9C757 hotmMOVEail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Lines: 21
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:167818 alt.politics.liberalism:388353 alt.politics.democrats:347725 alt.society.liberalism:433657 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1053792

Foxtrot

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 3:03:29 AM4/24/12
to
The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
the workplace for long periods of time. The same "pay gaps" apply to men
who leave the workplace as well so any claim of un-equal pay based on
gender is a red herring. Another lie by libs.

Libs want employers to pay for indefinite vacations. Who wouldn't take one
if they could? As always, libs drive up the cost of living.

NoBody

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 6:19:21 AM4/24/12
to
Typical left-wing bastard not providing the context. Here it is:

" Whatever gaps exist, he insists, stem from women’s decision to
prioritize childrearing over their careers. “Take a hypothetical
husband and wife who are both lawyers,” he says. “But the husband is
working 50 or 60 hours a week, going all out, making 200 grand a year.
The woman takes time off, raises kids, is not go go go. Now they’re 50
years old. The husband is making 200 grand a year, the woman is making
40 grand a year. It wasn’t discrimination. There was a different sense
of urgency in each person.” [...]

Grothman doesn’t accept these studies. When I ran the numbers by
him, he replied, “The American Association of University Women is a
pretty liberal group.” Nor, he argued, does its conclusion take into
account other factors, like “goals in life. You could argue that money
is more important for men. I think a guy in their first job, maybe
because they expect to be a breadwinner someday, may be a little more
money-conscious. To attribute everything to a so-called bias in the
workplace is just not true.”

Sid9

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 9:17:56 AM4/24/12
to

"Foxtrot" <fox...@null.com> wrote in message
news:hdjcp7divi3lth0rh...@4ax.com...
.
.
The Republican way...barefoot in the winter and pregnant in the summer.

PS...All Americans get the worst deal of all modern industrialized countries
regarding vacation time.

The war on women and workers by Republicans is REAL

Message has been deleted

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 12:18:05 AM4/25/12
to
John Doe wrote:
> Path:

unlimited.newshosting.com!s05-b18.iad!cyclone02.iad!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.131.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From:
John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics.liberalism,
alt.politics.democrats, alt.society.liberalism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, free.UseNet
Subject:
Re: GOP War on Women: Walker kills equal pay, 'cause men need the money
more
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:48 +0000 (UTC)
Organization:
A noiseless patient Spider
Lines:
46
Message-ID:
<jn5du0$ivc$1...@dont-email.me>
References:
<HDikr.43532$wa3....@unlimited.newshosting.com>
<4F922F23...@hotmMOVEail.com> <4F962D1F...@hotmMOVEail.com>
Injection-Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:48 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:
mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fHVRGxZR2JIGH95enH7DZQ";
logging-data="19436"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xPZYImqtiIgkCGYJMr/UmVLCRNG/t02s="
User-Agent:
Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock:
sha1:i7tzCF0o69hvPA6ofh1J+lqnpLM=
X-Received-Bytes:
3686
Xref:
unlimited.newshosting.com alt.politics.usa.republican:1442666
alt.politics.liberalism:1694331 alt.politics.democrats:1654228
alt.society.liberalism:5430742 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:4359244
X-Received-Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:49 UTC (s05-b18.iad)Path:

unlimited.newshosting.com!s05-b18.iad!cyclone02.iad!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.131.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From:
John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics.liberalism,
alt.politics.democrats, alt.society.liberalism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, free.UseNet
Subject:
Re: GOP War on Women: Walker kills equal pay, 'cause men need the money
more
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:48 +0000 (UTC)
Organization:
A noiseless patient Spider
Lines:
46
Message-ID:
<jn5du0$ivc$1...@dont-email.me>
References:
<HDikr.43532$wa3....@unlimited.newshosting.com>
<4F922F23...@hotmMOVEail.com> <4F962D1F...@hotmMOVEail.com>
Injection-Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:48 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:
mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fHVRGxZR2JIGH95enH7DZQ";
logging-data="19436"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xPZYImqtiIgkCGYJMr/UmVLCRNG/t02s="
User-Agent:
Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock:
sha1:i7tzCF0o69hvPA6ofh1J+lqnpLM=
X-Received-Bytes:
3686
Xref:
unlimited.newshosting.com alt.politics.usa.republican:1442666
alt.politics.liberalism:1694331 alt.politics.democrats:1654228
alt.society.liberalism:5430742 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:4359244
X-Received-Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:49 UTC (s05-b18.iad)Path:

unlimited.newshosting.com!s05-b18.iad!cyclone02.iad!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.131.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From:
John Doe <jd...@usenetlove.invalid>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics.liberalism,
alt.politics.democrats, alt.society.liberalism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, free.UseNet
Subject:
Re: GOP War on Women: Walker kills equal pay, 'cause men need the money
more
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:48 +0000 (UTC)
Organization:
A noiseless patient Spider
Lines:
46
Message-ID:
<jn5du0$ivc$1...@dont-email.me>
References:
<HDikr.43532$wa3....@unlimited.newshosting.com>
<4F922F23...@hotmMOVEail.com> <4F962D1F...@hotmMOVEail.com>
Injection-Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:48 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:
mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fHVRGxZR2JIGH95enH7DZQ";
logging-data="19436"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xPZYImqtiIgkCGYJMr/UmVLCRNG/t02s="
User-Agent:
Xnews/2006.08.05
Cancel-Lock:
sha1:i7tzCF0o69hvPA6ofh1J+lqnpLM=
X-Received-Bytes:
3686
Xref:
unlimited.newshosting.com alt.politics.usa.republican:1442666
alt.politics.liberalism:1694331 alt.politics.democrats:1654228
alt.society.liberalism:5430742 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:4359244
X-Received-Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:32:49 UTC (s05-b18.iad)

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 12:18:57 AM4/25/12
to
NoBody wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:33:35 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
> >Ref at
> >
> >
> >http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/04/09/460917/wisconsin-state-senator-money-less-important-wome/
> >
> > Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) quietly repealed his state’s equal pay law
> > last week, a decision that will make it harder for victims of wage
> > discrimination to sue for lost earnings and back wages. The law was enacted
> > primarily to address the massive pay gap that exists between male and female
> > workers, which is even bigger in Wisconsin than in other states.
> >
> > Repealing the law was a no-brainer for state Sen. Glenn Grothman (R), who led
> > the effort because of his belief that pay discrimination is a myth driven by
> > liberal women’s groups. Ignoring multiple studies showing that the pay gap
> > exists, Grothman blamed females for prioritizing childrearing and homemaking
> > instead of money, saying, "Money is more important for men," ...
> >
> >
> >Typical right wing bastards.
>
> Typical left-wing bastard not providing the context. Here it is:
>
> " Whatever gaps exist, he insists, stem from women’s decision to
> prioritize childrearing over their careers. “Take a hypothetical
> husband and wife who are both lawyers,” he says. “But the husband is
> working 50 or 60 hours a week, going all out, making 200 grand a year.
> The woman takes time off, raises kids, is not go go go. Now they’re 50
> years old. The husband is making 200 grand a year, the woman is making
> 40 grand a year. It wasn’t discrimination. There was a different sense
> of urgency in each person.” [...]
>
> Grothman doesn’t accept these studies. When I ran the numbers by
> him, he replied, “The American Association of University Women is a
> pretty liberal group.” Nor, he argued, does its conclusion take into
> account other factors, like “goals in life. You could argue that money
> is more important for men. I think a guy in their first job, maybe
> because they expect to be a breadwinner someday, may be a little more
> money-conscious. To attribute everything to a so-called bias in the
> workplace is just not true.”

The context is he's a right wing woman hating bastard. Thanks for showing that.

RT

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 12:20:19 AM4/25/12
to
Foxtrot wrote:
>
> RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/04/09/460917/wisconsin-state-senator-money-less-important-wome/
> >
> > Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) quietly repealed his state’s equal pay law
> > last week, a decision that will make it harder for victims of wage
> > discrimination to sue for lost earnings and back wages. The law was enacted
> > primarily to address the massive pay gap that exists between male and female
> > workers, which is even bigger in Wisconsin than in other states.
> >
> > Repealing the law was a no-brainer for state Sen. Glenn Grothman (R), who led
> > the effort because of his belief that pay discrimination is a myth driven by
> > liberal women’s groups. Ignoring multiple studies showing that the pay gap
> > exists, Grothman blamed females for prioritizing childrearing and homemaking
> > instead of money, saying, "Money is more important for men," ...
>
> The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
> the workplace for long periods of time. The same "pay gaps" apply to men
> who leave the workplace as well so any claim of un-equal pay based on
> gender is a red herring. Another lie by libs.

The pay gap is paying some less than someone else while both are doing the
same work.

DUH

What's next, paying blacks less? Your kind would love that.

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 12:47:34 AM4/25/12
to
> The Republican way...barefoot in the winter and pregnant in the summer.

Another example of the gender gap between Obama and Mitzi.

"If it's inevitable, just relax and enjoy it" - republicon gubernatorial nominee
Clayton Williams on rape

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 12:48:05 AM4/25/12
to
"In a very dark China Blue, China Blue condition." wrote:
>
> In article <hdjcp7divi3lth0rh...@4ax.com>,
> Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote:
>
> > The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
> > the workplace for long periods of time. The same "pay gaps" apply to men
> > who leave the workplace as well so any claim of un-equal pay based on
> > gender is a red herring. Another lie by libs.
>
> Now that you've explained it so well, I'm sure all the ladies in the audience
> will agree and now vote Republican.
>
> You're not too clear on this whole 'woo the voters' thing, are you?

Explains the gender gap between Obama and Mitzi.

RT

NoBody

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 6:03:36 AM4/25/12
to
Your evasion and admitted dishonesty is so noted.

Foxtrot

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 11:44:34 AM4/25/12
to
RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

>Foxtrot wrote:
>> The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
>> the workplace for long periods of time. The same "pay gaps" apply to men
>> who leave the workplace as well so any claim of un-equal pay based on
>> gender is a red herring. Another lie by libs.
>
>The pay gap is paying some less than someone else while both are doing the
>same work.
>
>DUH

Do you believe that experience has value? An experienced expert and
a novice both do the same work. Staying at home for whatever reason
means no experience is gained thus the worker is less valuable. Get
it?

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 11:38:48 AM4/26/12
to

"RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4F977B83...@hotmMOVEail.com...
And who is to be put in charge of determining "same work," you economically
illiterate stupid assed authoritarian fascist cocksucker?

Fascism: a system of government characterized by strong, often dictatorial
control of political and economic affairs

http://www.wordsmyth.net/live/home.php?script=search&matchent=fascism&matchtype=exact

Fascism: a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power,
forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry,
commerce, etc.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Fascism

-Eddie Haskell


Foxtrot

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 3:20:01 AM4/27/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:

>"Foxtrot" <fox...@null.com>
>> The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
>> the workplace for long periods of time. The same "pay gaps" apply to men
>> who leave the workplace as well so any claim of un-equal pay based on
>> gender is a red herring. Another lie by libs.
>>
>> Libs want employers to pay for indefinite vacations. Who wouldn't take one
>> if they could? As always, libs drive up the cost of living.
>>
>.
>.
>The Republican way...barefoot in the winter and pregnant in the summer.

>The war on women and workers by Republicans is REAL

Do you believe experience has value, Sid Ninny?

Answer this one before we can go any further.

linuxgal

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 10:35:01 AM4/27/12
to
Foxtrot wrote:
>
> The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
> the workplace for long periods of time.

Pay gap is an artificial concept. In reality, labor is a commodity, and
laborers and employers enter freely into an agreement where the laborer
exchanges his or her services for money and other compensation, just as
a supplier would do the same for his parts. When people toss around a
term such as "pay gap" they are reinforcing a delusion that pay is an
entitlement, or there's a baseline level of pay that is expected.

wy

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 10:50:22 AM4/27/12
to
So you mean that when two people, one man and the other a woman, with
the same years of experience and level of proficiency work on the same
job, there's nothing wrong with the man earning 10% or 20% more than
the woman? Try not to be profoundly stupid as you gag on your own
words while trying to come up with a convoluted reply .

linuxgal

unread,
Apr 27, 2012, 11:18:13 AM4/27/12
to
wy wrote:
> On Apr 27, 10:35 am, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>> Foxtrot wrote:
>>
>>> The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
>>> the workplace for long periods of time.
>> Pay gap is an artificial concept. In reality, labor is a commodity, and
>> laborers and employers enter freely into an agreement where the laborer
>> exchanges his or her services for money and other compensation, just as
>> a supplier would do the same for his parts. When people toss around a
>> term such as "pay gap" they are reinforcing a delusion that pay is an
>> entitlement, or there's a baseline level of pay that is expected.
>
> So you mean that when two people, one man and the other a woman, with
> the same years of experience and level of proficiency work on the same
> job, there's nothing wrong with the man earning 10% or 20% more than
> the woman?

If the woman accepts the lower pay, then she gets everything she
negotiated for. If the dumb moron is working for $4 dollars an hour
she's giving the employer her finite, precious time and accepting $4
dollars an hour as compensation. Liberals getting the government to
enforce a "minimum" wage is like conservatives getting the government to
ban television shows with women kissing each other.

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 10:29:17 PM4/28/12
to
Do you believe in getting paid the same for the same work?

Answer this one before we can go any further.

RT

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 10:29:50 PM4/28/12
to
Your bigoted women hating is so noted.

RT

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 10:30:48 PM4/28/12
to
HAHAHAH - it's the same work and there's an expert level? HAHAHHAHAAHHHH

RichTravsky

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 10:33:03 PM4/28/12
to
Mike Flannigan wrote:
> "RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
Job requirements and duties, duh, eh Flannimoron? Now go back to drinking
up your welfare check.

Foxtrot

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 11:33:23 PM4/28/12
to
RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

>Foxtrot wrote:
>>
>> "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>> >"Foxtrot" <fox...@null.com>
>> >> The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
>> >> the workplace for long periods of time. The same "pay gaps" apply to men
>> >> who leave the workplace as well so any claim of un-equal pay based on
>> >> gender is a red herring. Another lie by libs.

>> >The war on women and workers by Republicans is REAL
>>
>> Do you believe experience has value, Sid Ninny?
>>
>> Answer this one before we can go any further.
>>
>
>Do you believe in getting paid the same for the same work?
>
>Answer this one before we can go any further.

If one has more experience than the other, the quality of the work is
not the same. Because experience has value.

If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
off after finishing his internship?

Foxtrot

unread,
Apr 28, 2012, 11:38:02 PM4/28/12
to
Do you believe that some doctors are better than others, Twatsky?

Gawd you're stupid for not thinking this one through! ROFLMFAO

Message has been deleted

Foxtrot

unread,
Apr 29, 2012, 2:53:10 PM4/29/12
to
"In a very dark China Blue, China Blue condition." <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote:
>
>> If one has more experience than the other, the quality of the work is
>> not the same. Because experience has value.
>
>Different experiences matter to different jobs.

Ah. Experience makes one worker better than another in *some*
situations even though they're doing the same work.

Now who gets to decide in *which* jobs experience matters?

RichTravsky

unread,
May 2, 2012, 8:10:59 PM5/2/12
to
"In a very dark China Blue, China Blue condition." wrote:
>
> In article <21dpp71v2niaoale7...@4ax.com>,
> Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote:
>
> > If one has more experience than the other, the quality of the work is
> > not the same. Because experience has value.
>
> Different experiences matter to different jobs.

LOL - he's too stupid to know this.

> > If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
> > performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
> > off after finishing his internship?
>
> How many professions have the licensing and other legal overhead of medical
> doctors?

Another snout smacking for a rightard.

RT

Foxtrot

unread,
May 3, 2012, 12:27:56 AM5/3/12
to
He partially retracted what he said earlier, dumbass.

Chunky Blob wrote:
>Different experiences matter to different jobs.

Now answer my question, coward.

Foxtrot

unread,
May 3, 2012, 12:31:00 AM5/3/12
to
Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote:

>RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
>>Do you believe in getting paid the same for the same work?
>>
>>Answer this one before we can go any further.
>
>If one has more experience than the other, the quality of the work is
>not the same. Because experience has value.
>
>If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
>performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
>off after finishing his internship?

Answer the question, Twatsky. Choose the heart surgeon.

Message has been deleted

RichTravsky

unread,
May 5, 2012, 2:13:37 AM5/5/12
to
"In a very dark China Blue, China Blue condition." wrote:
>
> In article <h124q7ldc44j34ukt...@4ax.com>,
> Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote:
>
> > RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >"In a very dark China Blue, China Blue condition." wrote:
> > >> Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > If one has more experience than the other, the quality of the work is
> > >> > not the same. Because experience has value.
> > >>
> > >> Different experiences matter to different jobs.
> > >
> > >LOL - he's too stupid to know this.
> > >
> > >> > If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
> > >> > performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
> > >> > off after finishing his internship?
> > >>
> > >> How many professions have the licensing and other legal overhead of medical
> > >> doctors?
> > >
> > >Another snout smacking for a rightard.
> >
> > He partially retracted what he said earlier, dumbass.
> >
> > Chunky Blob wrote:
> > >Different experiences matter to different jobs.
>
> Managers mostly need to know how to interact and motivate people. Raising
> children can be useful experience for that. A stay at home parent that
> contributes to open software projects can be useful experience if that parent
> wants to get a job.
>
> Different experiences matter to different jobs.
>
> > Now answer my question, coward.
> >
> > >> > If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
> > >> > performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
> > >> > off after finishing his internship?
> >
>
> Surgeons has to meet rigourous licensing and qualifications that a CEO doesn't.
> So the training and experiences of surgeon are different from a CEO; I don't
> wouldn't want Debbi Fields to operate on me, but I wouldn't mind getting some of
> her cookies.

Heh facts of life explained to another con-servative.

RT

Foxtrot

unread,
May 5, 2012, 8:07:07 AM5/5/12
to
You have repeatedly trembled in fear by hiding behind Chunky Blob rather
than answer me directly, Twatsky. One more time:

>> > >> > If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
>> > >> > performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
>> > >> > off after finishing his internship?

It's a simple question with two possible answers. Which is more qualified,
experience or evasion? Answer me, Twatsky.

<TWATSKY'S DIRECT ANSWER TO FOXTROT'S QUESTION>


</TWATSKY'S DIRECT ANSWER TO FOXTROT'S QUESTION>

RichTravsky

unread,
May 8, 2012, 10:48:36 PM5/8/12
to
He beat me to it with a good answer.

> >> > >> > If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
> >> > >> > performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
> >> > >> > off after finishing his internship?
>
> It's a simple question with two possible answers. Which is more qualified,
> experience or evasion? Answer me, Twatsky.
>
> <TWATSKY'S DIRECT ANSWER TO FOXTROT'S QUESTION>
>
> </TWATSKY'S DIRECT ANSWER TO FOXTROT'S QUESTION>

Tell ya what - take your road act to the military and talk to some female
soldiers. When you come to, let us know what they said.

RT

Foxtrot

unread,
May 9, 2012, 1:28:59 AM5/9/12
to
Too stupid to answer yourself, Twatsky? Try again. Read carefully. If you
can't give one of the two possible answers, you're a coward.

>> >> > >> > If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
>> >> > >> > performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
>> >> > >> > off after finishing his internship?
>>
>> It's a simple question with two possible answers. Which is more qualified,
>> experience or evasion? Answer me, Twatsky.
>>
>> <TWATSKY'S DIRECT ANSWER TO FOXTROT'S QUESTION>
>>
>> </TWATSKY'S DIRECT ANSWER TO FOXTROT'S QUESTION>
>
>Tell ya what - take your road act to the military and talk to some female
>soldiers. When you come to, let us know what they said.

Non-answer, coward. Try again.

RichTravsky

unread,
May 12, 2012, 2:23:04 AM5/12/12
to
You're really not too bright, are you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_pay_for_equal_work

In America, for example, the law states that "employers may not pay unequal
wages to men and women who perform jobs that require substantially equal
skill, effort and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working
conditions within the same establishment."

Moron.

Foxtrot

unread,
May 17, 2012, 1:10:04 AM5/17/12
to
Defining equal is where your case crumbles, Twatsky. Equal is a warm
fuzzy word that cowardly politicians use so nobody resents anything. But
in the real world it's impossible to define.

Let's look at a real world situation. For example when it comes to different
doctors who do the SAME work "Just knowing the years of experience
explains ... about 28% of the variation in salaries."

How can this be if they're doing the same work? Because experience has
value. Working gains experience, staying at home doesn't.

Source http://www.measuringusability.com/usability-phd.php

Foxtrot

unread,
May 17, 2012, 1:13:25 AM5/17/12
to
"In a very dark China Blue, China Blue condition." <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote:
>
>> The "pay gap" exists because employees, typically women, choose to leave
>> the workplace for long periods of time. The same "pay gaps" apply to men
>> who leave the workplace as well so any claim of un-equal pay based on
>> gender is a red herring. Another lie by libs.
>
>Now that you've explained it so well, I'm sure all the ladies in the audience
>will agree and now vote Republican.

Not the stupid or hyper-emotional ones. You can have them.

>You're not too clear on this whole 'woo the voters' thing, are you?

Woo means kissing ass. All politicians do it that's why politicians are
disgusting.

RichTravsky

unread,
May 18, 2012, 10:27:38 PM5/18/12
to
Foxtrot wrote:
>
> RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
>
> >Foxtrot wrote:
>
> >> Non-answer, coward. Try again.
> >>
> >> >> >> > >> > If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
> >> >> >> > >> > performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
> >> >> >> > >> > off after finishing his internship?
> >
> >You're really not too bright, are you?
> >
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_pay_for_equal_work
> >
> > In America, for example, the law states that "employers may not pay unequal
> > wages to men and women who perform jobs that require substantially equal
> > skill, effort and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working
> > conditions within the same establishment."
>
> Defining equal is where your case crumbles, Twatsky. Equal is a warm

Job description? DUH?

Foxtrot

unread,
May 19, 2012, 1:42:28 PM5/19/12
to
RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

>Foxtrot wrote:
>>
>> RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Foxtrot wrote:
>>
>> >> Non-answer, coward. Try again.
>> >>
>> >> >> >> > >> > If you needed a heart surgeon, would you prefer one who has been
>> >> >> >> > >> > performing them nonstop for twenty years or one who took twenty years
>> >> >> >> > >> > off after finishing his internship?
>> >
>> >You're really not too bright, are you?
>> >
>> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_pay_for_equal_work
>> >
>> > In America, for example, the law states that "employers may not pay unequal
>> > wages to men and women who perform jobs that require substantially equal
>> > skill, effort and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working
>> > conditions within the same establishment."
>>
>> Defining equal is where your case crumbles, Twatsky. Equal is a warm
>
>Job description? DUH?

Next time add something to the discussion or have the courage to
admit that you have been defeated, asswipe.

RichTravsky

unread,
May 21, 2012, 1:10:32 AM5/21/12
to
Pop quiz: what are job descriptions for?

heh heh
0 new messages