Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Romney flips twice today!

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Sid9

unread,
May 1, 2012, 9:43:09 PM5/1/12
to
From the AP:

"Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
"totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S. military
raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a hideout in Pakistan."

flip flop....flop-flip


Spaghetti spined Romney flips again



--
Ziggy's law, "For every complicated problem there's usually a simple
solution and its always wrong!"

clairbear

unread,
May 1, 2012, 10:06:13 PM5/1/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnq3fh$dvn$1...@dont-email.me:

> From the AP:
>
> "Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
> politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
> "totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S.
> military raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a
> hideout in Pakistan."
>
> flip flop....flop-flip
>
>
> Spaghetti spined Romney flips again
>
>
>

Taking credt for the death Of Bin Laden is one thing Trying to politicize
it the way Obama is doing is the worst kind crass grandstanding, is a
completely different act
For Romney to criticize the add is proper and not out of line with giving
credit where he feel is may be due
But the logic of that is wasted on a DNC shill like you

Sid9

unread,
May 1, 2012, 10:12:56 PM5/1/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA046E0D6B...@216.196.97.142...
.
.
.
Romney's gay national security advisor "resigned".
...Spaghetti spined Romney allowed it!

Obama made a decision that put his entire future on the line.
Had the Obama mission failed, Obama's career was over
His chance for a second term would have been kaput.

It took a brave strong man to make that decision.



Richard Steel

unread,
May 1, 2012, 10:17:50 PM5/1/12
to
On May 1, 6:43 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> From the AP:
>
> "Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
> politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
> "totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S. military
> raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a hideout in Pakistan."
>
> flip flop....flop-flip

Where's the "flip-flop", exactly?

clairbear

unread,
May 1, 2012, 10:21:25 PM5/1/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnq57b$m8f$1...@dont-email.me:
You already post this load of BS If he had listened to his vp and not
authorized it and it had got out the he pussied out THAT would have sunk
him so he had to go for it.
If he were so brave HE would have insisted on the KSM trial in NYC
rather than wimping out and braking his promise to shut down Gitmo
You emperor is is wearing no clothes.
BUT then only shills like you are blind to that.

Sid9

unread,
May 1, 2012, 10:26:44 PM5/1/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA046E36A7...@216.196.97.142...
.
.
It was neither Romney's or Biden's decision to make.

It was the president alone.

Only the president risks his entire career on his decision

Obama made a decision that put his entire future on the line.
Had the Obama mission failed, Obama's career was over
His chance for a second term would have been kaput.

It took a brave strong man to make that decision.


Wimpy Romney let a strong conservative "resign" because he was gay.
Forced into a position by an anti-gay faction in the Republican party
Romney spineless......Like a string of boiled spaghetti

wy

unread,
May 1, 2012, 10:33:43 PM5/1/12
to
When Romney also said “it’s not worth moving heaven and earth and
spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person”? And
now it's totally appropriate for Obama to claim credit, but in doing
so Obama is only politicizing it? Etch-a-sketch, all over the map,
every which way Romney effortlessly at work and lunkheads like you
fall all over his oleaginous flim-flamming.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/president-obama-suggests-the-public-look-at-romneys-previous-statements-on-going-after-obl/

clairbear

unread,
May 1, 2012, 10:58:52 PM5/1/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnq618$po6$1...@dont-email.me:

{Reposts deleted ]
> .
> .
> It was neither Romney's or Biden's decision to make.
>
> It was the president alone.
>
[Repetive sid crap deleted]

Biden apparently was asked for advise
The president, unless this one's ego is way out of control, does not
operate with out the advice of his aides secretaries and counselors. He may
have made the ultimate descision but not with out advise. All of his
predecessors used that method. Unless you divine leader has be come an
autocratic despot he took the descision under advise of those around him.
If he did unilaterally make the descision on he own with consultation then
he truly unfit to serve. Is that what you are saying? It sure sounds that
way

Sid9

unread,
May 1, 2012, 11:05:29 PM5/1/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA046E9C41...@216.196.97.142...
After all the advice and advisors are done it's the President's decision to
make.

Obama knew that if this mission failed his presidency was finished.
His career was finished.

It was his decision alone.

That's why the title PRESIDENT.....not Etch-A-Sketch operator.

We leave the Etch-A-Sketch to the wimp that the Republican party will
nominate

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 1, 2012, 11:10:40 PM5/1/12
to
> From the AP:
>
> "Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
> politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
> "totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S. military
> raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a hideout in Pakistan."
>
> flip flop....flop-flip
>
> Spaghetti spined Romney flips again

Someone is gonna make a million bucks selling a line of cruisers
called "Mitt Flops."


Bret Cahill


linuxgal

unread,
May 1, 2012, 11:24:10 PM5/1/12
to
It's probably going to go over like Billy Beer.

Clave

unread,
May 1, 2012, 11:37:04 PM5/1/12
to
"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA046E0D6B...@216.196.97.142...

<...>

> Taking credt for the death Of Bin Laden is one thing Trying to politicize
> it the way Obama is doing is the worst kind crass grandstanding

Oh boo-fucking-hoo.

You think the GOP wouldn't be doing twice as much grandstanding
*cough*missionaccomplished*cough* if things were reversed? GMAFB.

What's REALLY got the GOP's panties in a knot is quite simply that
Obama got him and their boys didn't.

The GOP loses this issue, whining like rich fat white crybabies. You'd all
be better off just not talking about it at all any more.

Jim



Winston Smith, American Patriot

unread,
May 2, 2012, 12:56:31 AM5/2/12
to
clairbear <clai...@msn.com> wrote on Wed 02 May 2012 05:06:13a
When Republicans can't run on the economy---because they always destroy the
economies of nations, ours and others'---then they fall back on national
security: "We can defend the country, whereas those afraid-to-hold-a-gun-
turn-tail-and-run peacenik appeasing Democrats will let the mongol in and
rape your wife and daughters."

Clinton beat Serbia without a single casualty. How? Because Serbians had a
relatively 20th century infrastructure, and Clinton targeted it to turn them
into the 17th century. Net effect? The Serbs turned on their own leader.
BLUE RIBBON: No more ethnic cleansing of Bosnia or Kosovars

That is a SMART COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF.

Obama has THREE blue ribbons:

1. Osama Bin Laden: Obama is an academic, and the greatest compliment you
can give an academician is that he has "discipline." Look on any diploma
(bachelors, masters, doctorate) and you see the word "discipline." The
steady determination to focus on a necessary goal and get the fucking thing
done. GW Bush was an underachiever in school, so nothing could be expected
of him or the undisciplined rabble he led. Bin Laden is dead because of
disciplined individuals. Bin Laden is dead because of BHO.

2. Shutting Down That Crime Against The Peace Iraq: Bush and Cheney should
be on trial for that---I'd volunteer to be their jailer and waterboarder---
and he's saving billions on the deficit.

3. Helping In the Arab Spring---Libya: When the Benghazi Libyans said after
Tunisia and Egypt, "okay, our turn," there was nothing stopping the utterly
ruthless Gaddafi horde from murdering women and children right and left in
that country. The US had no choice and Obama successfully used the British
and French---who deserve credit too---as cover to topple the old dictator.
The Libyans will erect a statue of Obama eventually as gratitude, right next
to Mohammed Bouazizi.


So the Cultist Willard can't run on national security.

Why aren't the people talking about Willard's dodge of the Vietnam draft
also?? How much time did we spend talking about Clinton on this matter??


He can't even run on the economy. The former Gov of MA has a PATHETIC
record of job creation in the state. And his record at Bain shows he's done
as much to put people out of work and make the guys at the top richer. If
you're part of the 1%, Romney's clearly your man.

But it's votes, not dollars that win elections.

Romney will be a footnote in history. "Did better than his dad in at least
getting the party nomination, but not even close to the level of one of the
country's greater presidents, Barack Obama."


[newsgroups restored]



--
America's fascists, who are recognized by the name
"Republican" and "Teabagger," are the evil that festers
when good, decent people look on in apathy, doing nothing.

emoneyjoe

unread,
May 2, 2012, 1:20:40 AM5/2/12
to
On Tue, 1 May 2012 21:43:09 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:

>From the AP:
>
>"Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
>politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
>"totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S. military
>raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a hideout in Pakistan."
>
>flip flop....flop-flip
>
>
>Spaghetti spined Romney flips again

Who was it you were rooting for, Newt?







emoneyjoe

unread,
May 2, 2012, 1:31:27 AM5/2/12
to
Why, is getting reelected more important than
ridding the world of a dangerous element?







emoneyjoe

unread,
May 2, 2012, 1:34:08 AM5/2/12
to
In any position except national security there
would have been no problem, the question should
be why a gay person ever ended up in such a job
in the first place.







Sid9

unread,
May 2, 2012, 7:02:15 AM5/2/12
to

"Winston Smith, American Patriot"
<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote in message
news:XnsA04750C8B...@88.198.244.100...
http://www.uclick.com/client/nyt/po/


Bible Studies with Al Sharpton

unread,
May 2, 2012, 8:06:57 AM5/2/12
to
The Destruction Of The American Middle Class By The Obozo Regime -
Real median household income is down $4,300 since Obozo took office in
January 2009
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-30/obama-fails-to-stem-middle-class-slide-he-blamed-on-bush
The rebound from the worst recession since the 1930s has generated
relatively few of the moderately skilled jobs that once supported the
middle class, tightening the financial squeeze on many Americans, even
those who are employed.
-----
Bad News For America Is Bad News For Obozo

Oglethorpe

unread,
May 2, 2012, 11:42:19 AM5/2/12
to

"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:jnq3fh$dvn$1...@dont-email.me...
> From the AP:
>
> "Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
> politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a


He is politicizing it. He sure can't run on his crappy economics.


clairbear

unread,
May 2, 2012, 9:48:31 AM5/2/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnq89s$533$1...@dont-email.me:

>
> "clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:XnsA046E9C41...@216.196.97.142...
>> "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in
>> news:jnq618$po6$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>> {Reposts deleted ]
>>> .
>>> .
>>> It was neither Romney's or Biden's decision to make.
>>>
>>> It was the president alone.
>>>
>> [Repetive sid crap deleted]
>>
>> Biden apparently was asked for advise
>> The president, unless this one's ego is way out of control, does not
>> operate with out the advice of his aides secretaries and counselors.
>> He may
>> have made the ultimate descision but not with out advise. All of his
>> predecessors used that method. Unless you divine leader has be come
>> an autocratic despot he took the descision under advise of those
>> around him. If he did unilaterally make the descision on he own with
>> consultation then he truly unfit to serve. Is that what you are
>> saying? It sure sounds that way
>
> After all the advice and advisors are done it's the President's
> decision to make.
So you agree with what I pointed out that that he had to consult before
going ahead
> Obama knew that if this mission failed his presidency was finished.
> His career was finished.
Due to secrecy of black ops it may have never come to light had it
failed to find Bin Laden or it would have just be written off as just
another operation along with the drone strikes across the border into
Pakistan
> It was his decision alone.
There you go agin trying to deny he had to seek out advise
> That's why the title PRESIDENT.....not Etch-A-Sketch operator.
Actually he is president not dictator, despot
> We leave the Etch-A-Sketch to the wimp that the Republican party will
> nominate
>
Casting feckless aspursian seems to be what you are good at.You are a
rather hateful little soul.

clairbear

unread,
May 2, 2012, 9:59:57 AM5/2/12
to
"Clave" <cla...@the.monastery.com> wrote in
news:UW1or.18529$bU5....@newsfe04.iad:

> "clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:XnsA046E0D6B...@216.196.97.142...
>
> <...>
>
>> Taking credt for the death Of Bin Laden is one thing Trying to
>> politicize it the way Obama is doing is the worst kind crass
>> grandstanding
>
.
>
> You think the GOP wouldn't be doing twice as much grandstanding
> *cough*missionaccomplished*cough* if things were reversed? GMAFB.
The sign was put up by members of the crew not the President, you silly
twit
> What's REALLY got the GOP's panties in a knot is quite simply that
> Obama got him and their boys didn't.
Actually Seal team 6 got him all Obama did was authorize it
> The GOP loses this issue, whining like rich fat white crybabies.
> You'd all be better off just not talking about it at all any more.
Yeah give Obama a pass on his crass attitude towards the nation
> Jim
>
>
>
>

Sid9

unread,
May 2, 2012, 10:11:59 AM5/2/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA04765B48...@216.196.97.142...
Who made jr wear the flight suit?

Yeah, the crew made the sign....jr's staff had nothing to do with it.

Suuurre!

Where is jr now?

Why isn't he out there supporting Romney?

You know the answer to that one....he's a boat anchor to Romney's chances.

Yet you tout the same failed Republican policies on America

clairbear

unread,
May 2, 2012, 11:16:56 AM5/2/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnrfbj$5hc$1...@dont-email.me:

>
> "clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:XnsA04765B48...@216.196.97.142...
>> "Clave" <cla...@the.monastery.com> wrote in
>> news:UW1or.18529$bU5....@newsfe04.iad:
>>
>>> "clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:XnsA046E0D6B...@216.196.97.142...
>>>
>>> <...>
>>>
>>>> Taking credt for the death Of Bin Laden is one thing Trying to
>>>> politicize it the way Obama is doing is the worst kind crass
>>>> grandstanding
>>>
>> .
>>>
>>> You think the GOP wouldn't be doing twice as much grandstanding
>>> *cough*missionaccomplished*cough* if things were reversed? GMAFB.
>> The sign was put up by members of the crew not the President, you
>> silly twit
>>> What's REALLY got the GOP's panties in a knot is quite simply that
>>> Obama got him and their boys didn't.
>> Actually Seal team 6 got him all Obama did was authorize it
>>> The GOP loses this issue, whining like rich fat white crybabies.
>>> You'd all be better off just not talking about it at all any more.
>> Yeah give Obama a pass on his crass attitude towards the nation
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Who made jr wear the flight suit?
Why don't you go down to Texas and ask him
> Yeah, the crew made the sign....jr's staff had nothing to do with it.
According to all the sources the sign was the navy's idea BTW the USS
Abraham Lincoln was on it's way home having accomplished it's mission at
that time
> Suuurre!
>
> Where is jr now?
He is a private citizen
> Why isn't he out there supporting Romney?
He is a private citizen and his going out on the campaign is not
something he is obligated to do Just like carter and Clinton are not out
stumping for Obama as he has been campaigning for the last 3 plus years
> You know the answer to that one....he's a boat anchor to Romney's
> chances.
MORE OF YOU PATENT FALLACIOUS BS
> Yet you tout the same failed Republican policies on America
You wanna talk failure how about the Porkulus, Obamacare bringing down
health cost and insurance costs, and his closing of gitmo,
Three strikes if it was baseball Obama would have already struck out

Sid9

unread,
May 2, 2012, 11:22:26 AM5/2/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA04772C1E...@216.196.97.142...
.
.
.
I would guess that Romney wants bush,jr to stay at least 100 miles away from
any campaign event.

clairbear

unread,
May 2, 2012, 11:44:28 AM5/2/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnrjfm$du$1...@dont-email.me:
You Guess? That what it comes you you guess. All you do is guess because
you don't know, lie because that all you know and parrot the DNC because
that's how you know.
In essence you really don't know anything better to do than spew hate
at anyone who opposes your great leader

Sid9

unread,
May 2, 2012, 2:15:01 PM5/2/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA047776D1...@216.196.97.142...
Is bush,jr within 100 miles of the Romney campaign?
When you see it post it.

RRRS must be so proud of bush,jr's departure from Washington!

clairbear

unread,
May 2, 2012, 4:15:23 PM5/2/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnrtj9$3na$1...@dont-email.me:
Thanks for proving my point that you really don't know anything

TRAYVON

unread,
May 2, 2012, 6:33:09 PM5/2/12
to
An Mitt's sons enjoy another [secluded] family vacation ...

http://xhamster.com/movies/299035/2_cute_guys_make_it_on_the_grass.html


Lamont Cranston

unread,
May 2, 2012, 8:02:26 PM5/2/12
to
On 5/1/2012 7:06 PM, clairbear wrote:
> "Sid9"<sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnq3fh$dvn$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>> From the AP:
>>
>> "Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
>> politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
>> "totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S.
>> military raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a
>> hideout in Pakistan."
>>
>> flip flop....flop-flip
>>
>>
>> Spaghetti spined Romney flips again
>>
>>
>>
>
> Taking credt for the death Of Bin Laden is one thing Trying to politicize
> it the way Obama is doing is the worst kind crass grandstanding, is a
> completely different act

Really? Maybe he should have landed on an aircraft carrier, codpiece
firmly in place, and announced the end of the war in Iraq years before
it actually ended. You're a real piece of work, Clueless. Republicans
have been politicizing national security for decades, you fucking moron.

Richard Steel

unread,
May 2, 2012, 9:17:19 PM5/2/12
to
On May 1, 7:33 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> On May 1, 10:17 pm, Richard Steel <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 1, 6:43 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > From the AP:
>
> > > "Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
> > > politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
> > > "totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S. military
> > > raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a hideout in Pakistan."
>
> > > flip flop....flop-flip
>
> > Where's the "flip-flop", exactly?
>
> When Romney also said “it’s not worth moving heaven and earth and
> spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person”?

Here's the ACTUAL quote: “I think, I wouldn’t want to over-
concentrate on Bin Laden. He’s one of many, many people who are
involved in this global Jihadist effort. He’s by no means the only
leader. It’s a very diverse group—Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, Muslim
Brotherhood and of course different names throughout the world. It’s
not worth moving heaven and earth and spending billions of dollars
just trying to catch one person. It is worth fashioning and executing
an effective strategy to defeat global, violent Jihad and I have a
plan for doing that.”

Get it - he didn't say that we shouldn't go after bin Laden....he said
that doesn't finish the job.

Even Arianna Huffington called the ad "despicable".

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505267_162-57423987/arianna-huffington-presidents-bin-laden-ad-despicable/

wy

unread,
May 2, 2012, 9:35:51 PM5/2/12
to
On May 2, 9:17 pm, Richard Steel <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
> On May 1, 7:33 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 1, 10:17 pm, Richard Steel <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 1, 6:43 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > From the AP:
>
> > > > "Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
> > > > politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
> > > > "totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S. military
> > > > raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a hideout in Pakistan."
>
> > > > flip flop....flop-flip
>
> > > Where's the "flip-flop", exactly?
>
> > When Romney also said “it’s not worth moving heaven and earth and
> > spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person”?
>
> Here's the ACTUAL quote:  “I think, I wouldn’t want to over-
> concentrate on Bin Laden. He’s one of many, many people who are
> involved in this global Jihadist effort. He’s by no means the only
> leader. It’s a very diverse group—Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, Muslim
> Brotherhood and of course different names throughout the world. It’s
> not worth moving heaven and earth and spending billions of dollars
> just trying to catch one person. It is worth fashioning and executing
> an effective strategy to defeat global, violent Jihad and I have a
> plan for doing that.”
>
> Get it - he didn't say that we shouldn't go after bin Laden....he said
> that doesn't finish the job.

But to finish the job, you need to cut the head off the snake. That's
what Obama did and Romney didn't. Too bad you're not watching Rock
Center right now, they're getting into the whole behind-the-scenes
story of the planning and activity to get bin Laden involving the
principle players of the White House and the Pentagon. Now that's how
a president and his team runs an operation to a successful conclusion
and keeps his pragmatic cool at the same time, none of this chickening
out at the last minute the way Bush peed in his pants in 2001 when
Delta Force had bin Laden within striking distance and he refused to
give the okay. You should consider yourself lucky to have a level-
headed Obama running things right now.


>
> Even Arianna Huffington called the ad "despicable".

Arianna is stupid. Hey, even boy, you're stupid. Maybe the two of
you should meet up and say and do stupid things together. I'm sure
that plastic blow-up doll "wife" of yours won't mind.


>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505267_162-57423987/arianna-huffington-pr...

Richard Steel

unread,
May 2, 2012, 10:10:05 PM5/2/12
to
No, to finish the job, you need to FINISH THE JOB. Obama wants to cut
and run.

> > Even Arianna Huffington called the ad "despicable".

> Arianna is stupid.  Hey, even boy, you're stupid.  Maybe the two of
> you should meet up and say and do stupid things together.  I'm sure
> that plastic blow-up doll "wife" of yours won't mind.

Jon Stewart also said that the commercial is a low blow.

John McCain, a REAL war hero, noted that "heroes don't brag".

This is blowing up in Obama's face. Like the War on Catholics. Like
ObamaCare.

Republicans are very quietly saying to each other - "is it possible
that Obama is this stupid?"

wy

unread,
May 2, 2012, 10:35:10 PM5/2/12
to
What isn't finished?


>
> > > Even Arianna Huffington called the ad "despicable".
> > Arianna is stupid.  Hey, even boy, you're stupid.  Maybe the two of
> > you should meet up and say and do stupid things together.  I'm sure
> > that plastic blow-up doll "wife" of yours won't mind.
>
> Jon Stewart also said that the commercial is a low blow.

What's the matter, can't make up your own mind? Do you formulate your
views on the basis of what others say that are in line with what you
want to hear?


>
> John McCain, a REAL war hero, noted that "heroes don't brag".

He bragged about being with heroes.


>
> This is blowing up in Obama's face.  Like the War on Catholics.  Like
> ObamaCare.

Nothing's blowing up but the farts that are building up in that anal
cavity of yours. Repugnant hot gas, no doubt.


>
> Republicans are very quietly saying to each other - "is it possible
> that Obama is this stupid?"

And no one but boy, you're stupid types are bothering to even listen.



Winston Smith, American Patriot

unread,
May 3, 2012, 2:54:48 AM5/3/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote on Wed 02 May 2012 02:02:15p
Sid, we're trying to show right wingers how Obama matches and exceeds the
Republican Rominee.

Occupying Afghanistan for an eternity---remember what McCain said in
2008?---is something that makes right wingers cream their pants.

Richard Steel

unread,
May 3, 2012, 3:08:17 AM5/3/12
to
I've made up my mind - Obama is a scumbag.

> > John McCain, a REAL war hero, noted that "heroes don't brag".

> He bragged about being with heroes.

No, the other heroes bragged about being with him.

> > This is blowing up in Obama's face.  Like the War on Catholics.  Like
> > ObamaCare.

> Nothing's blowing up but the farts that are building up in that anal
> cavity of yours.  Repugnant hot gas, no doubt.

In six months, the Democrats will desperately need those Catholic
votes.

> > Republicans are very quietly saying to each other - "is it possible
> > that Obama is this stupid?"

> And no one but boy, you're stupid types are bothering to even listen.

Sorry, Obama's shot himself in the foot six times in the past month or
so.

TRAYVON

unread,
May 3, 2012, 8:38:19 AM5/3/12
to
WHO'S THE BIGGEST ASSHOLE?

GEORGE W. BUSH

or

MITT ROMNEY?




(you have to choose one)


clairbear

unread,
May 3, 2012, 12:46:23 PM5/3/12
to
"Winston Smith, American Patriot"
<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA04864D5B...@88.198.244.100:
Aside from comedy central and Colbert wear do you get your opinion The
DNC handbook

Sid9

unread,
May 3, 2012, 1:04:20 PM5/3/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA04881EB3...@216.196.97.142...
NY Times
CNN
MSNBC
FOX
Sun-Sentinel
Limbo's show
Stewert
Colbert
Cspan 1, 2 and 3
KOS
Raw Story

DNC? No...How do I get info from them?

wy

unread,
May 3, 2012, 1:40:32 PM5/3/12
to
More like you make up things in your mind.


>
> > > John McCain, a REAL war hero, noted that "heroes don't brag".
> > He bragged about being with heroes.
>
> No, the other heroes bragged about being with him.

Isn't McCain supposed to be a hero? So heroes do brag about being
with heroes.


>
> > > This is blowing up in Obama's face.  Like the War on Catholics.  Like
> > > ObamaCare.
> > Nothing's blowing up but the farts that are building up in that anal
> > cavity of yours.  Repugnant hot gas, no doubt.
>
> In six months, the Democrats will desperately need those Catholic
> votes.

Wishful hallucinating.


>
> > > Republicans are very quietly saying to each other - "is it possible
> > > that Obama is this stupid?"
> > And no one but boy, you're stupid types are bothering to even listen.
>
> Sorry, Obama's shot himself in the foot six times in the past month or
> so.

He still seems to be walking around just fine.

clairbear

unread,
May 3, 2012, 2:34:49 PM5/3/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnudqp$imc$1...@dont-email.me:
And with all that you are still a fool and a DNC shill

Sid9

unread,
May 3, 2012, 2:44:33 PM5/3/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA048944D1...@216.196.97.142...
Not fool enough to support the gutless wonder the Republicans will nominate!

clairbear

unread,
May 3, 2012, 3:05:50 PM5/3/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnujmm$p6r$1...@dont-email.me:
You really are a vile hateful little soul are'nt you
What makes you think he is gutless Is it those voices in your head or
are you just that filled with hate towards anyone who would dare run
against your divine leader.

Sid9

unread,
May 3, 2012, 3:20:59 PM5/3/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA048998F1...@216.196.97.142...
Romney, too gutless to stand up for his choice, Grenell.
Grenell had worked for Joe Bolton. His conservatives credits were impeccable
Grenell was bullied by anti-gay extremists.
Romney allowed him to "resign"



Thu May 03, 2012 at 06:33 AM PDT.

Romney campaign privately muzzled Richard Grenell to avoid confronting the
homophobic right

by Jed Lewison Follow .

Publicly, the Romney campaign says it it wanted foreign policy spokesman
Richard Grenell to stay on the campaign, but according to a new report from
The New York Times, the campaign privately muzzled the openly gay staffer
just days before his resignation, ordering him to stay silent during a
campaign conference call on foreign policy with reporters that he had
organized:

It turned out he was at home in Los Angeles, listening in, but stone silent
and seething. A few minutes earlier, a senior Romney aide had delivered an
unexpected directive, according to several people involved in the call.
“Ric,” said Alex Wong, a policy aide, “the campaign has requested that
you not speak on this call.”
Mr. Wong added, “It’s best to lay low for now.”
The reason they'd asked him to stay silent?

“It’s not that the campaign cared whether Ric Grenell was gay,” one
Republican adviser said.
“They believed this was a nonissue. But they didn’t want to confront
the religious right.”

So Mitt Romney wasn't being a homophobic bully. It's just that his campaign
was afraid to stand up to them.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/03/1088441/-Romney-campaign-privately-muzzled-Richard-Grenell-to-avoid-confronting-the-homophobic-right

clairbear

unread,
May 3, 2012, 5:23:46 PM5/3/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnulr0$81i$1...@dont-email.me:

>
>
> Romney, too gutless to stand up for his choice, Grenell.
> Grenell had worked for Joe Bolton. His conservatives credits were
> impeccable Grenell was bullied by anti-gay extremists.
> Romney allowed him to "resign"
>

So you are saying youy should be allowed to decide who Rmoney should have
working in his campaign and who he should allow to resign from his staff
If it was going to be a distraction for the campaign and he sees that and
choose to resign what business is it of yours or mine. Where were you when
the gay governor of NJ resign when it became an issue By your standard that
makes you and your democrat buddies gutless. It hardly makes one as you so
crassly put it gutless to accept a resignation when it will be a
distraction to have that person stay on the payroll.

Sid9

unread,
May 3, 2012, 5:39:35 PM5/3/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA048B0F28...@216.196.97.142...
.
.
.
"So you are saying"?????
Then your words follow.
My words are in my post.

I say Romney is gutless and spineless and caved to an extremist bunch in the
Republican party.

The assertion that Romney is like a flag is true.
His beliefs?
It depends on the way the wind blows.

clairbear

unread,
May 3, 2012, 6:42:20 PM5/3/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnutus$qc2$1...@dont-email.me:
You spew this hate sp[eech and yet aside from plagarizing liberal hack
sites you offer no real proof of anything other than you rabid hatred

Sid9

unread,
May 3, 2012, 10:00:29 PM5/3/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA048BE443...@216.196.97.142...
.
.
.
You don’t deny the truth of what I wrote.
The proof is in the news reports of the incident.

The Daily Kos put it on the internet
The NY Times confirmed the report
CNN carried it as a news report.


The news is in the Etch-a-sketch comment by one of his staff.

Republicans offer us an Etch-a-sketch candidate.
We had a son of a rich man not so long ago.
He was a national tragedy.
We don’t need another one.



Richard Steel

unread,
May 4, 2012, 1:13:20 AM5/4/12
to

> > > Nothing's blowing up but the farts that are building up in that anal
> > > cavity of yours.  Repugnant hot gas, no doubt.

> > In six months, the Democrats will desperately need those Catholic
> > votes.

> Wishful hallucinating.

In 2008, Barack Obama won the Catholic vote by nine points, 54/45,
over John McCain on his way to a seven-point victory in the national
popular vote. Three months after announcing the HHS mandate that
would force religious hospitals, schools, and charities to fund
contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients, Obama has lost that
edge among the tens of millions of Catholic voters. A new Gallup poll
shows Obama in a dead heat with Mitt Romney, at just about the same
level as McCain got in 2008:

Catholic voters in the United States are evenly split in their
support for Barack Obama and Mitt Romney for president, mirroring the
national trend. However, Hispanic Catholics — about 18% of the total
group of Catholic voters — are overwhelmingly likely to support Obama
over Romney, while a majority of non-Hispanic white Catholics support
Romney.

Obama led Romney by one percentage point, 46% to 45%, among the
more than 8,000 registered voters interviewed as part of Gallup Daily
tracking conducted April 11-30. Among the 1,915 Catholics interviewed
during that time, support for Obama and Romney was almost the same,
with 46% support for Obama and 46% for Romney.

Catholics’ divided preferences at this point contrast with those
of the largest religious group in the country, Protestants, whose
support swings to Romney by 51% to 41%. The split in Catholics’
preferences also differs from the choice among those who identify with
another religion or no religion at all, a group that clearly supports
Obama, by 58% to 33%.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/154430/Catholics-Presidential-Pick-Differs-Ethnicity-Religiosity.aspx

Republicans can win without the Catholic vote....Democrats can't.

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 4, 2012, 1:27:33 AM5/4/12
to
> > > > Nothing's blowing up but the farts that are building up in that anal
> > > > cavity of yours.  Repugnant hot gas, no doubt.
> > > In six months, the Democrats will desperately need those Catholic
> > > votes.
> > Wishful hallucinating.
>
> In 2008, Barack Obama won the Catholic vote by nine points,

And in 2012 Barack Obama is stuck at a 60% chance of being reelected.

https://data.intrade.com/graphing/jsp/closingPricesForm.jsp?contractId=743474&tradeURL=https://www.intrade.com

And spree shooting wingers know this.


wy

unread,
May 4, 2012, 1:30:43 AM5/4/12
to
On May 4, 1:13 am, Richard Steel <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > Nothing's blowing up but the farts that are building up in that anal
> > > > cavity of yours.  Repugnant hot gas, no doubt.
> > > In six months, the Democrats will desperately need those Catholic
> > > votes.
> > Wishful hallucinating.
>
> In 2008, Barack Obama won the Catholic vote by nine points, 54/45,
> over John McCain on his way to a seven-point victory in the national
> popular vote.  Three months after announcing the HHS mandate that
> would force religious hospitals, schools, and charities to fund
> contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients, Obama has lost that
> edge among the tens of millions of Catholic voters.  A new Gallup poll
> shows Obama in a dead heat with Mitt Romney, at just about the same
> level as McCain got in 2008:

Yeah, and look at what happened: McCain lost. End of story.


>
>     Catholic voters in the United States are evenly split in their
> support for Barack Obama and Mitt Romney for president, mirroring the
> national trend. However, Hispanic Catholics — about 18% of the total
> group of Catholic voters — are overwhelmingly likely to support Obama
> over Romney, while a majority of non-Hispanic white Catholics support
> Romney.
>
>     Obama led Romney by one percentage point, 46% to 45%, among the
> more than 8,000 registered voters interviewed as part of Gallup Daily
> tracking conducted April 11-30. Among the 1,915 Catholics interviewed
> during that time, support for Obama and Romney was almost the same,
> with 46% support for Obama and 46% for Romney.
>
>     Catholics’ divided preferences at this point contrast with those
> of the largest religious group in the country, Protestants, whose
> support swings to Romney by 51% to 41%. The split in Catholics’
> preferences also differs from the choice among those who identify with
> another religion or no religion at all, a group that clearly supports
> Obama, by 58% to 33%.
>
> http://www.gallup.com/poll/154430/Catholics-Presidential-Pick-Differs...
>
> Republicans can win without the Catholic vote....Democrats can't.

Wishful hallucinating.

Lamont Cranston

unread,
May 4, 2012, 1:39:25 AM5/4/12
to
Clueless is lucky to actually form a complete standard American English
sentence. Most of the time, he/she is lucky to complete a sentence that
is close to being understood. Estimated IQ: 70.

emoneyjoe

unread,
May 4, 2012, 7:06:31 AM5/4/12
to
That would be high for a dimocrat.







clairbear

unread,
May 4, 2012, 9:04:23 AM5/4/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnvd82$c10$1...@dont-email.me:

>
> "clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:XnsA048BE443...@216.196.97.142...
>> "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jnutus$qc2$1@dont-
On does not have to probve a negative but when you make assertion you
need to back them up since you you use clearly left wing hack peice like
this daily ckos sit it reneder your so called source suspect

emoneyjoe

unread,
May 4, 2012, 9:47:59 AM5/4/12
to
>> You don? deny the truth of what I wrote.
>> The proof is in the news reports of the incident.
>>
>> The Daily Kos put it on the internet
>> The NY Times confirmed the report
>> CNN carried it as a news report.
>>
>>
>> The news is in the Etch-a-sketch comment by one of his staff.
>>
>> Republicans offer us an Etch-a-sketch candidate.
>> We had a son of a rich man not so long ago.
>> He was a national tragedy.
>> We don? need another one.
>>
>On does not have to probve a negative but when you make assertion you
>need to back them up since you you use clearly left wing hack peice like
>this daily ckos sit it reneder your so called source suspect

Where else would he find deals like

http://www.barackobama.com/om-dinner-with-barack-june-signon?source=OM2012_LB_G_dwb-content_fundraising_ap4&utm_medium=om2012&utm_source=G&utm_campaign=DD_dwb-content&utm_content=ap4&gclid=CO3317Tg5q8CFcSa7QodrDms2g


and up to date information like the 115,000 new jobs
in April, apparently enough to keep the 380,000 layoffs
from sending the unemployment rate lower;

http://bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm


Even though there is lots of red on the site,
the information seems to be "official";

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/04/1082845/-Another-month-of-weak-job-growth-as-the-official-unemployment-rate-drops-to-8-1-U6-at-14-5-








Sid9

unread,
May 4, 2012, 10:16:42 AM5/4/12
to

"clairbear" <clai...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA0495C48B...@216.196.97.142...
I posted the sources of the story, sources that included direct quotes from
members of the Romney campaign.

Here's the NY Times confirmation of the story:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/03/us/politics/richard-grenell-resigns-from-mitt-romneys-foreign-policy-team.html?ref=global-home

That means they independently confirmed the Daily KOS story.

Are you starting another birth certificate thing?

No one knows what Romney stands for.

My criticism of this Republican offering stands.

"There are none so blind as those who will not see"

emoneyjoe

unread,
May 4, 2012, 11:03:56 AM5/4/12
to
Still same one. :-)


>No one knows what Romney stands for.

Wait til after the convention and adopting
of a platform before you decide to vote for him.


>My criticism of this Republican offering stands.
>
>"There are none so blind as those who will not see"

And those that vote the same straight ticket
year after year.

Time to switch parties to see if anybody has
any new ideas or better ideas.

The more on the dole compared to those
earning enough to pay $30,000 a year taxes,
the more difficult things get.







clairbear

unread,
May 4, 2012, 12:43:16 PM5/4/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jo0ocf$3n1$1...@dont-email.me:

> Are you starting another birth certificate thing?
Bring up the birth certificate again...Really ...REALLY
You are'nt a closet birther are you?
Personally I never saw any point in questioning the birth certificate. As
that should have been vetted at the point his candidacey was first
announced.

Lamont Cranston

unread,
May 4, 2012, 8:59:51 PM5/4/12
to
Could you please restate using standard American English and spelling?

Sid9

unread,
May 4, 2012, 9:12:10 PM5/4/12
to

"Lamont Cranston" <HeWho...@Penumbra.com> wrote in message
news:4fa47b89$1...@news.x-privat.org...
By evening Clair can barely see the keyboard.

Richard Steel

unread,
May 4, 2012, 9:16:59 PM5/4/12
to
On May 3, 10:30 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> On May 4, 1:13 am, Richard Steel <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Nothing's blowing up but the farts that are building up in that anal
> > > > > cavity of yours.  Repugnant hot gas, no doubt.
> > > > In six months, the Democrats will desperately need those Catholic
> > > > votes.
> > > Wishful hallucinating.
>
> > In 2008, Barack Obama won the Catholic vote by nine points, 54/45,
> > over John McCain on his way to a seven-point victory in the national
> > popular vote.  Three months after announcing the HHS mandate that
> > would force religious hospitals, schools, and charities to fund
> > contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients, Obama has lost that
> > edge among the tens of millions of Catholic voters.  A new Gallup poll
> > shows Obama in a dead heat with Mitt Romney, at just about the same
> > level as McCain got in 2008:
>
> Yeah, and look at what happened: McCain lost.  End of story.

This time around, Obama has a record to defend, and it's a disaster.
He's going to desperately need the Catholics.

clairbear

unread,
May 4, 2012, 9:25:08 PM5/4/12
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:jo1upg$clg$1...@dont-email.me:
Ah the ignorance of the left wing loon squad rears it's ugly head yet
again. As to the poor dummy Who prefers to her behing the psuedomnym of
fictional alter ego he has a place in the KF because he has even less
class nad intellect than you, sidney

Lamont Cranston

unread,
May 5, 2012, 3:37:25 PM5/5/12
to

Richard Steel

unread,
May 5, 2012, 8:03:22 PM5/5/12
to
On May 3, 10:27 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > > > > Nothing's blowing up but the farts that are building up in that anal
> > > > > cavity of yours.  Repugnant hot gas, no doubt.
> > > > In six months, the Democrats will desperately need those Catholic
> > > > votes.
> > > Wishful hallucinating.
>
> > In 2008, Barack Obama won the Catholic vote by nine points,
>
> And in 2012 Barack Obama is stuck at a 60% chance of being reelected.
>
> https://data.intrade.com/graphing/jsp/closingPricesForm.jsp?contractI...
>
> And spree shooting wingers know this.

Really? You're counting on intrade betters six months out?

What was it that PT Barnum said about "Born Every Minute?

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 6, 2012, 1:25:44 PM5/6/12
to
Sounds like you can clean up just by putting some money on Romney but
you aren't.

Why?

There are only two reasons you aren't betting on Romney:

1. You don't think Romney will win.

2. You are too doggie poopie stoopid to have any money.

Now which one is it?






Nickname unavailable

unread,
May 6, 2012, 7:44:00 PM5/6/12
to
On May 2, 9:10 pm, Richard Steel <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
> On May 2, 6:35 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 9:17 pm, Richard Steel <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 1, 7:33 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 1, 10:17 pm, Richard Steel <rsteel2...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 1, 6:43 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > From the AP:
>
> > > > > > "Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of
> > > > > > politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was
> > > > > > "totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S. military
> > > > > > raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a hideout in Pakistan."
>
> > > > > > flip flop....flop-flip
>
> > > > > Where's the "flip-flop", exactly?
>
> > > > When Romney also said “it’s not worth moving heaven and earth and
> > > > spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person”?
>
> > > Here's the ACTUAL quote:  “I think, I wouldn’t want to over-
> > > concentrate on Bin Laden. He’s one of many, many people who are
> > > involved in this global Jihadist effort. He’s by no means the only
> > > leader. It’s a very diverse group—Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, Muslim
> > > Brotherhood and of course different names throughout the world. It’s
> > > not worth moving heaven and earth and spending billions of dollars
> > > just trying to catch one person. It is worth fashioning and executing
> > > an effective strategy to defeat global, violent Jihad and I have a
> > > plan for doing that.”
> > > Get it - he didn't say that we shouldn't go after bin Laden....he said
> > > that doesn't finish the job.
> > But to finish the job, you need to cut the head off the snake.
>
> No, to finish the job, you need to FINISH THE JOB.  Obama wants to cut
> and run.
>
> > > Even Arianna Huffington called the ad "despicable".
> > Arianna is stupid.  Hey, even boy, you're stupid.  Maybe the two of
> > you should meet up and say and do stupid things together.  I'm sure
> > that plastic blow-up doll "wife" of yours won't mind.
>
> Jon Stewart also said that the commercial is a low blow.
>
> John McCain, a REAL war hero, noted that "heroes don't brag".
>
> This is blowing up in Obama's face.  Like the War on Catholics.  Like
> ObamaCare.
>
> Republicans are very quietly saying to each other - "is it possible
> that Obama is this stupid?"

thank god bush did not grand stand by landing on a air craft carrier
in full gear on t.v., and declare we won in irag. now that could be
considered real show boating:)))))

Richard Steel

unread,
May 6, 2012, 10:01:27 PM5/6/12
to
3. I don't put excess money into silly betting pools. I send it to
Republican candidates.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
May 7, 2012, 10:13:40 AM5/7/12
to
Liberals are greedy.... the rest of us want to make things better for
all Americans.

--
*He has the most who is most content with the least* -Diogenes-
0 new messages