Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Remember How Anti-War Left-Wing Traitors LOVED UN Inspector Scott Ritter?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Killing, Inc.

unread,
Jan 16, 2010, 6:08:03 AM1/16/10
to
To Catch a Liberal Predator
by David Swindle

Remember Scott Ritter? He was once a tough talking weapons inspector
who was deeply skeptical that Saddam Hussein had gotten rid of his
WMDs. Then, without explanation, his position shifted on a dime to
“Hussein could have WMDs? That’s crazy talk. Who could believe that?”
At the end of the day, Ritter’s new position proved to half right and
half wrong: Saddam did have active WMD programs and pre-Gulf War WMDs,
but no new WMD stockpiles.

In any case, liberals LOVED THEM some Scott Ritter. Unfortunately,
life out of the anti-war spotlight doesn’t look to have gone so well
for Ritter:

Ritter, 48, allegedly masturbated in front of a Web camera while
he was engaged in conversation in an Internet chat room with an
undercover cop posing as the teenage girl.

…Ritter, of Delmar, N.Y., allegedly told the girl, “Emily,” that
he was a 44-year-old man from Albany, N.Y., according to an affidavit
of probable cause.

http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/01/14/to-catch-a-liberal-predator/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the second time Ritter has been caught in an internet sex
sting operation.

In 2001, he had allegedly tried to lure a 16-year-old girl to a fast
food outlet only to find that the 'girl' was an undercover
investigator posing online as a minor to investigate internet sex
crime.

That arrest came to light two years later, when Ritter a chief United
Nations weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-98 was widely criticising
the war against Iraq.

With news of his arrest being widely publicised in the media, Ritter
lost his standing as a war critic.

This time, if he is convicted of the most serious charge he has been
accused of, he can be jailed for up to seven years.

http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/jan/160110-Scott-Ritter-United-Nations-sex-internet.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's a copy of the affidavit of probable cause. It comes with the
warning "Extremely Sexually Explicit."

http://www.poconorecord.com/assets/pdf/PR1152113.PDF
______________________________________________________

Sorry Scott, but you're a disgusting pedophile pervert. Don't you just
love when treasonous leftwing liars get theirs?

Doug Bashford

unread,
Jan 16, 2010, 5:46:43 PM1/16/10
to

in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Killing, Inc. said about:
Remember How Anti-War Left-Wing Traitors LOVED UN Inspector
Scott Ritter?


> To Catch a Liberal Predator
> by David Swindle

Liberal, huh? Ex-Marine Scott Ritter has always
been a Republican.

In March 2007 Ritter was harshly critical of Bill Clinton for
politicizing the inspection process during his presidency and of
Hillary Clinton for obfuscating that record.
He wrote:

"From January 1993 until my resignation from the United
Nations in August 1998, I witnessed first hand the duplicitous
Iraq policies of the administration of Bill Clinton, the
implementation of which saw a President lie to the American
people about a threat he knew was hyped, lie to Congress about
his support of a disarmament process his administration wanted
nothing to do with, and lie to the world about American intent,
which turned its back on the very multilateral embrace of
diplomacy as reflected in the resolutions of the Security Council
Hillary Clinton so piously refers to in her speech, and instead
pursued a policy defined by the unilateral interests of the
Clinton administration to remove Saddam Hussein from power."
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Ritter



> Remember Scott Ritter? He was once a tough talking weapons inspector
> who was deeply skeptical that Saddam Hussein had gotten rid of his
> WMDs.

Pretty brave for a Richpubelickin, huh?
Brave?...not really, he would know the truth,
and he did, ...he was right. No significant
WMD, (just useless leftovers,) no program.

Yer still PO'ed about getting suckered by yer
heros again, ain'tcha?
But you guys never did learn that lesson, did ya?....

> Then, without explanation, his position shifted on a dime to

Why do you just make shit up?

> =93Hussein could have WMDs? That=92s crazy talk. Who could believe that?=94
> At the end of the day, Ritter=92s new position proved to half right and


> half wrong: Saddam did have active WMD programs and pre-Gulf War WMDs,
> but no new WMD stockpiles.

Read a book. Saddam had neither.
So you're just another swallower, huh?
SUCKER!!!!!

I wonder how many of you mindless freepers and dittohead
parrots are still out there who STILL believe that?


>
> In any case, liberals LOVED THEM some Scott Ritter. Unfortunately,

> life out of the anti-war spotlight doesn=92t look to have gone so well


> for Ritter:
>
> Ritter, 48, allegedly masturbated in front of a Web camera while
> he was engaged in conversation in an Internet chat room with an
> undercover cop posing as the teenage girl.

....snip

Typical Repub, personally attack anybody who
disagrees with yer pupeteers. Just like any
doggie would.


> Sorry Scott, but you're a disgusting pedophile pervert. Don't you just
> love when treasonous leftwing liars get theirs?

Laughing!!!! Except he's a life-long Republickin!
Are you suggesting that no Repubs ever attacked Bush's
policies?

Rush Limbaugh:
"Voters who voted yesterday believe that
Republicans are 'the big government party' now.
How can you blame them?"
-- Rush Limbaugh November 8, 2006

- Political Economics:

- "Fascism should more properly be called
- corporatism, since it is the merger
- of state and corporate power."
-- - Benito Mussolini, father of fascism.

- Socialism: The government/people own the corporations.
- Fascism: The corporations/government own the people.

- Republicans: think the very rich are the backbone of America.
- Democrats: think the middle class are the backbone of America.

- Republicans: fear government but trust corporations.
- Democrats: fear both.

- "Fascism...is the merger
- of state and corporate power."
-- - Benito Mussolini


So? How might that merger happen in America?
Well in this case, what's the difference between merger
and government's deregulation of corporations?
Not much that I can see. Voila!

Corporations are now super people protected by the Constitution.
But it hasn't always been that way.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. is a person, not in fact, not in flesh, not in any tangible form, but in law.
To their everlasting glory, this is not what the Founding Fathers intended.
For 100 years after the Constitution was ratified, various governmental entities led corporations around on leashes, like obedient puppies, canceling their charters promptly if they compromised the public good in any way.

The leashes broke in 1886, the puppies got away, and the public good was increasingly compromised until it was finally displaced altogether.

Today, the First Amendment protects the right of corporations-as-persons to finance political campaigns and to employ lobbyists, who then specify and redeem the incurred obligations.
Democracy has been transformed into a crypto-plutocracy, and public policy is no longer crafted to serve the American people at large. It is shaped instead to maintain, protect, enhance or create opportunities for corporate profit.

Isn't that the root of the rot?

more info:
End Corporate "Personhood"
The Supreme Court's ruling is set to either expand the doctrines
of corporate personhood and corporate rights by expanding the ...
www.change.org/ideas/view/end_corporate_personhood

Corporate Personhood
Unequal Protection may prove to be the most significant issue in the history of corporate personhood, a doctrine which dates to 1886. ...
www.commondreams.org/views02/1226-04.htm

Doug Bashford

unread,
Jan 16, 2010, 6:14:37 PM1/16/10
to

Doug Bashford said:

> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Killing, Inc. said:

> > To Catch a Liberal Predator
> > by David Swindle
>
> Liberal, huh? Ex-Marine Scott Ritter has always
> been a Republican.

......snip

> > Hussein could have WMDs? That=92s crazy talk. Who could believe that?=94
> > At the end of the day, Ritter=92s new position proved to half right and
> > half wrong: Saddam did have active WMD programs and pre-Gulf War WMDs,
> > but no new WMD stockpiles.


OF COURSE there were "pre-Gulf War WMDs!!!"
Dumb ass. That was under Bush Sr! ...like
TEN YEARS before 9-11.

But Daddy Bush & Clinton's inspection policy
of containment cleaned them out. ...as much
to your Hero Liars hated that...it left them
nothing but LIES to invade Iraq.

But what did THAT matter? Every cowardly bully
luvs a pile-on against a helpless "foe."

>
> Read a book. Saddam had neither.
> So you're just another swallower, huh?
> SUCKER!!!!!

- Political Economics:

0 new messages