Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bill O’Reilly Tears Into Brian Williams For Giving Obama A ‘Pass’ On Libya - Media not safeguarding us from tyranny
30 views
Skip to first unread message
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 27, 2012, 6:31:18 AM10/27/12
to
Bill O’Reilly Tears Into Brian Williams For Giving Obama A ‘Pass’ On
Libya
by Josh Feldman | 8:32 pm, October 26th, 2012
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-oreilly-rails-into-brian-williams-for-giving-obama-a-pass-on-libya/
Bill O’Reilly opened his show tonight asking if recent events in Libya
will lose the election for President Obama. O’Reilly appeared to be
losing patience with how Obama keeps dodging questions about what
happened in Libya and who told which administration officials what to
say. O’Reilly also blamed the media, and Brian Williams in particular,
for not actually bringing these issues up in interviews with the
president.
RELATED: Brian Williams Asks Obama About Libya Attack, Lack Of Visits
To Israel On Rock Center
O’Reilly brought up a report that said urgent requests for backup in
the Benghazi consulate were not followed up on by the CIA. During a
radio interview, Obama claimed that he was not “personally aware of”
any security requests. O’Reilly sighed and criticized Obama for not
being able to explain exactly what happened in Libya. He could not
comprehend why the president is still unable to clarify the situation,
considering how much misinformation was put out by his administration.
Of course, the media has not been very quick to hold Obama’s feet to
the fire on this one. O’Reilly brought up Williams’ interview of the
president and how the NBC newsman took a pass on actually grilling
Obama on what happened in Libya. After playing the video of Obama
talking with Williams about Libya, O’Reilly sighed again and said the
president is just regurgitating the same answer about Libya,
criticizing Williams for not following up.
“Instead of citing some inconsistencies from the administration about
the Libyan attack, Mr. Williams dropped the subject, totally dropped
it, after one misleading question… [and] implied that American
intelligence stands behind the theory that the Libyan attack was,
quote, ‘spontaneous.’ That was not a fact, but was presented as such
by Brian Williams.”
O’Reilly reiterated that the media needs to actually grill the Obama
administration on what happened in Libya, instead of giving him a pass
on a major foreign security issue. He said the most important question
any journalist can ask Obama is
Watch the video below, courtesy of Fox News:
Libya
by Josh Feldman | 8:32 pm, October 26th, 2012
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-oreilly-rails-into-brian-williams-for-giving-obama-a-pass-on-libya/
Bill O’Reilly opened his show tonight asking if recent events in Libya
will lose the election for President Obama. O’Reilly appeared to be
losing patience with how Obama keeps dodging questions about what
happened in Libya and who told which administration officials what to
say. O’Reilly also blamed the media, and Brian Williams in particular,
for not actually bringing these issues up in interviews with the
president.
RELATED: Brian Williams Asks Obama About Libya Attack, Lack Of Visits
To Israel On Rock Center
O’Reilly brought up a report that said urgent requests for backup in
the Benghazi consulate were not followed up on by the CIA. During a
radio interview, Obama claimed that he was not “personally aware of”
any security requests. O’Reilly sighed and criticized Obama for not
being able to explain exactly what happened in Libya. He could not
comprehend why the president is still unable to clarify the situation,
considering how much misinformation was put out by his administration.
Of course, the media has not been very quick to hold Obama’s feet to
the fire on this one. O’Reilly brought up Williams’ interview of the
president and how the NBC newsman took a pass on actually grilling
Obama on what happened in Libya. After playing the video of Obama
talking with Williams about Libya, O’Reilly sighed again and said the
president is just regurgitating the same answer about Libya,
criticizing Williams for not following up.
“Instead of citing some inconsistencies from the administration about
the Libyan attack, Mr. Williams dropped the subject, totally dropped
it, after one misleading question… [and] implied that American
intelligence stands behind the theory that the Libyan attack was,
quote, ‘spontaneous.’ That was not a fact, but was presented as such
by Brian Williams.”
O’Reilly reiterated that the media needs to actually grill the Obama
administration on what happened in Libya, instead of giving him a pass
on a major foreign security issue. He said the most important question
any journalist can ask Obama is
Watch the video below, courtesy of Fox News:
Message has been deleted
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 27, 2012, 12:23:08 PM10/27/12
to
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 09:39:12 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 06:31:18 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>Bill O’Reilly Tears Into Brian Williams For Giving Obama A ‘Pass’ On
>>Libya
>
>
>
>http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/10/985191/chaffetz-absolutely-funding-embassy-security/
> GOP Rep: I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security
>
It's pretty f'ing sad when you think money would hold up securing
American lives who represent the President in hostle, terrorist
countries.
It goes to show how low rent your Boob really 'is'.
...
THE FACTS: Ryan is right, judging by testimony from Obama
administration officials at a congressional hearing this week.
Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security,
told lawmakers she refused requests for more security in Benghazi,
saying the State Department wanted to train Libyans to protect the
consulate. Eric Nordstrom, who was the top security official in Libya
earlier this year, testified he was criticized for seeking more
security.
...
http://www.startribune.com/politics/173823931.html?refer=y
Charlene Lamb testified it wasn't a matter of money you ignorant
monkey
Do you know who Charlene Lamb 'is' you pathetic piece of...?
>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 06:31:18 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>Bill O’Reilly Tears Into Brian Williams For Giving Obama A ‘Pass’ On
>>Libya
>
>
>
> GOP Rep: I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security
>
It's pretty f'ing sad when you think money would hold up securing
American lives who represent the President in hostle, terrorist
countries.
It goes to show how low rent your Boob really 'is'.
...
THE FACTS: Ryan is right, judging by testimony from Obama
administration officials at a congressional hearing this week.
Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security,
told lawmakers she refused requests for more security in Benghazi,
saying the State Department wanted to train Libyans to protect the
consulate. Eric Nordstrom, who was the top security official in Libya
earlier this year, testified he was criticized for seeking more
security.
...
http://www.startribune.com/politics/173823931.html?refer=y
Charlene Lamb testified it wasn't a matter of money you ignorant
monkey
Do you know who Charlene Lamb 'is' you pathetic piece of...?
Message has been deleted
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 27, 2012, 3:55:51 PM10/27/12
to
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:25:04 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:23:08 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>...
>>THE FACTS: Ryan is right, judging by testimony from Obama
>>administration officials at a congressional hearing this week.
>>Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security,
>>told lawmakers she refused requests for more security in Benghazi,
>>saying the State Department wanted to train Libyans to protect the
>>consulate. Eric Nordstrom, who was the top security official in Libya
>>earlier this year, testified he was criticized for seeking more
>>security.
>
>Doesn't mention anything about your republicans taking money OUT of
>the budget for their protection.
>
>Does it.
No kidding you piece of...
It's because it WASN'T a factor you pathetic...
>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:23:08 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>...
>>THE FACTS: Ryan is right, judging by testimony from Obama
>>administration officials at a congressional hearing this week.
>>Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security,
>>told lawmakers she refused requests for more security in Benghazi,
>>saying the State Department wanted to train Libyans to protect the
>>consulate. Eric Nordstrom, who was the top security official in Libya
>>earlier this year, testified he was criticized for seeking more
>>security.
>
>the budget for their protection.
>
>Does it.
No kidding you piece of...
It's because it WASN'T a factor you pathetic...
Message has been deleted
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 28, 2012, 1:56:29 AM10/28/12
to
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:36:52 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:55:51 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>Doesn't mention anything about your republicans taking money OUT of
>>>the budget for their protection.
>>>
>>>Does it.
>>
>>
>>No kidding you piece of...
>>
>>It's because it WASN'T a factor you pathetic...
>
>Of course it was.
>
>No money
You're a lying...
If it were about the money then it only goes to show how much value
the Boob has in his representatives abroad, none.
The boob values money over the lives of his countryman.
That's what you and your argument says about your President. He and
YOU care nothing about Chris Stevens. Other wise money would not be a
factor (as stated by Charlene Lamb), you low life...
>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:55:51 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>Doesn't mention anything about your republicans taking money OUT of
>>>the budget for their protection.
>>>
>>>Does it.
>>
>>
>>No kidding you piece of...
>>
>>It's because it WASN'T a factor you pathetic...
>
>
>No money
You're a lying...
If it were about the money then it only goes to show how much value
the Boob has in his representatives abroad, none.
The boob values money over the lives of his countryman.
That's what you and your argument says about your President. He and
YOU care nothing about Chris Stevens. Other wise money would not be a
factor (as stated by Charlene Lamb), you low life...
Hell Stomper
Oct 28, 2012, 2:04:06 AM10/28/12
to
On Oct 27, 6:31 am, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig wrote:
> Bill O Reilly Tears Into Brian Williams For Giving Obama A Pass On
> Libya
>
> by Josh Feldman | 8:32 pm, October 26th, 2012http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-oreilly-rails-into-brian-williams-for...
> Bill O Reilly Tears Into Brian Williams For Giving Obama A Pass On
> Libya
>
year... and let the chips fall where they may, er... as long as it's
someplace else.
R. Dean
Oct 28, 2012, 2:21:58 AM10/28/12
to
On 10/27/2012 11:39 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> for
> U.S. embassy security amid political attacks from Republicans that
> the
> Obama administration did not do enough to secure the U.S. diplomatic
> mission in Benghazi, Libya that was attacked last month.
> ...
> But hidden beneath the GOP campaign is the fact that House
> Republicans
> voted to cut nearly $300 million from the U.S. embassy security
> budget.
> When asked if he voted to cut the funds this morning on CNN, Chaffetz
> said, "Absolutely":
>
True or not, it isn't the issue. The US military was within striking
distance. The Obama Administration, including Obama was watching the
attack in real time. Remember him Biden and other high ranking officals
of the administration? One story is: Obama went to bed, got up went to
the rose garden made speech then went on a fund raising campaign.
Three calls were made requesting assistance, and were told to "stand
down". Obama, Clinton, Rice all knew it was _not_ a spontaneous response
to a video on U-Tube, but lied claiming it was. Obama 6 times blamed a
video in the UN. He lied! The film maker was arrested and
remains in custody until after the election, and unable to tell his
story. This no doubt is the greatest cover-up in US history. It includes
the entire administration, the major TV news outlets, the wealthy
hollywood star, big name entainers etc.. It makes the Nixon cover-up
look like amateurs. If all you do is watch the national news TV
channels, you do not get any real facts. They are protecting Obama.
>
> O'BRIEN: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy
> security?
>
> CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices
> in this country. We have — think about this — 15,000 contractors
> in
> Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, private army there for
> President Obama in Baghdad.
>
> And we're talking about can we get two dozen or so people into
> Libya
> to help protect our forces? When you're in tough economic times,
> you
> have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.
> ...
>
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 06:31:18 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> 7/11.nig wrote:
>
>> Bill O’Reilly Tears Into Brian Williams For Giving Obama A ‘Pass’ On
>> Libya
>
>
>
> 7/11.nig wrote:
>
>> Bill O’Reilly Tears Into Brian Williams For Giving Obama A ‘Pass’ On
>> Libya
>
>
>
> http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/10/985191/chaffetz-absolutely-funding-embassy-security/
> GOP Rep: I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security
>
> Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said today that he voted to cut funding
> GOP Rep: I 'Absolutely' Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security
>
> for
> U.S. embassy security amid political attacks from Republicans that
> the
> Obama administration did not do enough to secure the U.S. diplomatic
> mission in Benghazi, Libya that was attacked last month.
> ...
> But hidden beneath the GOP campaign is the fact that House
> Republicans
> voted to cut nearly $300 million from the U.S. embassy security
> budget.
> When asked if he voted to cut the funds this morning on CNN, Chaffetz
> said, "Absolutely":
>
True or not, it isn't the issue. The US military was within striking
distance. The Obama Administration, including Obama was watching the
attack in real time. Remember him Biden and other high ranking officals
of the administration? One story is: Obama went to bed, got up went to
the rose garden made speech then went on a fund raising campaign.
Three calls were made requesting assistance, and were told to "stand
down". Obama, Clinton, Rice all knew it was _not_ a spontaneous response
to a video on U-Tube, but lied claiming it was. Obama 6 times blamed a
video in the UN. He lied! The film maker was arrested and
remains in custody until after the election, and unable to tell his
story. This no doubt is the greatest cover-up in US history. It includes
the entire administration, the major TV news outlets, the wealthy
hollywood star, big name entainers etc.. It makes the Nixon cover-up
look like amateurs. If all you do is watch the national news TV
channels, you do not get any real facts. They are protecting Obama.
>
> O'BRIEN: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy
> security?
>
> CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices
> in this country. We have — think about this — 15,000 contractors
> in
> Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, private army there for
> President Obama in Baghdad.
>
> And we're talking about can we get two dozen or so people into
> Libya
> to help protect our forces? When you're in tough economic times,
> you
> have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.
> ...
>
R. Dean
Oct 28, 2012, 2:35:11 AM10/28/12
to
On 10/27/2012 3:25 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
during the hearings was that in excess of $2 billion was available for
American Embassys abroad. So, additional funds were not needed. This is
just another "blame somebody else" ploy that has characterized the Obama
Administration from it's beginning. I'm really shocked he didn't blame
Bush.
>
> Does it.
>
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:23:08 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> 7/11.nig wrote:
>
>> ...
>> THE FACTS: Ryan is right, judging by testimony from Obama
>> administration officials at a congressional hearing this week.
>> Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security,
>> told lawmakers she refused requests for more security in Benghazi,
>> saying the State Department wanted to train Libyans to protect the
>> consulate. Eric Nordstrom, who was the top security official in Libya
>> earlier this year, testified he was criticized for seeking more
>> security.
>
> 7/11.nig wrote:
>
>> ...
>> THE FACTS: Ryan is right, judging by testimony from Obama
>> administration officials at a congressional hearing this week.
>> Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security,
>> told lawmakers she refused requests for more security in Benghazi,
>> saying the State Department wanted to train Libyans to protect the
>> consulate. Eric Nordstrom, who was the top security official in Libya
>> earlier this year, testified he was criticized for seeking more
>> security.
>
> Doesn't mention anything about your republicans taking money OUT of
> the budget for their protection.
>
This wasn't the issue. There was sufficient funds available. It came out
> the budget for their protection.
>
during the hearings was that in excess of $2 billion was available for
American Embassys abroad. So, additional funds were not needed. This is
just another "blame somebody else" ploy that has characterized the Obama
Administration from it's beginning. I'm really shocked he didn't blame
Bush.
>
> Does it.
>
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 28, 2012, 2:45:26 AM10/28/12
to
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:35:11 -0400, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>
wrote:
This is a real case of treason.
Check out www.theblaze.com.
>>
>> Does it.
>>
wrote:
Check out www.theblaze.com.
>>
>> Does it.
>>
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 28, 2012, 11:45:24 PM10/28/12
to
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:22:40 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:56:29 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>No money
>>
>>You're a lying...
>>
>>If it were about the money then it only goes to show how much value
>>the Boob has in his representatives abroad, none.
>
>Which part of government funds things again, Barta?
There's that little $2 billion contingency fund you forget about,
stupid.
Tell some more lies, liar.
CB
"I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of
things"
--Dan Rather
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGsU8SBLcvI
Oboobuh's ethic
>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:56:29 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>No money
>>
>>You're a lying...
>>
>>If it were about the money then it only goes to show how much value
>>the Boob has in his representatives abroad, none.
>
There's that little $2 billion contingency fund you forget about,
stupid.
Tell some more lies, liar.
CB
"I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of
things"
--Dan Rather
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGsU8SBLcvI
Oboobuh's ethic
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 28, 2012, 11:49:02 PM10/28/12
to
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:24:09 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:21:58 -0400, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>spontaneous event?
>
>If you plan, set up, and commit a military force---your statement
>would be correct. The "eyes" would be there.
You know there was a drone giving the Boob a live feed. You and the
Boob can't help your self from lying about most anything, 'at any
cost'.
>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:21:58 -0400, "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>True or not, it isn't the issue. The US military was within striking
>>distance. The Obama Administration, including Obama was watching the
>>attack in real time. Remember him Biden and other high ranking officals
>>of the administration?
>
>How could they watch in "real time" if no military was present in a
>>distance. The Obama Administration, including Obama was watching the
>>attack in real time. Remember him Biden and other high ranking officals
>>of the administration?
>
>spontaneous event?
>
>If you plan, set up, and commit a military force---your statement
>would be correct. The "eyes" would be there.
You know there was a drone giving the Boob a live feed. You and the
Boob can't help your self from lying about most anything, 'at any
cost'.
Message has been deleted
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 29, 2012, 9:34:10 PM10/29/12
to
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:58:03 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:45:24 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>>If it were about the money then it only goes to show how much value
>>>>the Boob has in his representatives abroad, none.
>>>
>>>Which part of government funds things again, Barta?
>>
>>There's that little $2 billion contingency fund you forget about,
>>stupid.
>
>You think there is $2 Billion in some accessible account that a
>president can use without congressional approval?
>
>There are funds available---because the account is budgeted
>
>THe funds need approval.
You keep digging the Boob deeper into his spider hole
>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:45:24 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>>If it were about the money then it only goes to show how much value
>>>>the Boob has in his representatives abroad, none.
>>>
>>>Which part of government funds things again, Barta?
>>
>>There's that little $2 billion contingency fund you forget about,
>>stupid.
>
>president can use without congressional approval?
>
>There are funds available---because the account is budgeted
>
>THe funds need approval.
You keep digging the Boob deeper into his spider hole
Message has been deleted
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 30, 2012, 10:11:16 AM10/30/12
to
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:34:10 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
to spend the money, I get it. Meanwhile the Boob goes to Vegas for a
fundraiser.
What low life character does that show of the Thug?
7/11.nig wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:58:03 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:45:24 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>>7/11.nig wrote:
>>
>>>>>If it were about the money then it only goes to show how much value
>>>>>the Boob has in his representatives abroad, none.
>>>>
>>>>Which part of government funds things again, Barta?
>>>
>>>There's that little $2 billion contingency fund you forget about,
>>>stupid.
>>
>>You think there is $2 Billion in some accessible account that a
>>president can use without congressional approval?
>>
>>There are funds available---because the account is budgeted
>>
>>THe funds need approval.
>
>
>You keep digging the Boob deeper into his spider hole
So the Boob denied Chris Stevens extra security because he didn't want
>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:58:03 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:45:24 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>>7/11.nig wrote:
>>
>>>>>If it were about the money then it only goes to show how much value
>>>>>the Boob has in his representatives abroad, none.
>>>>
>>>>Which part of government funds things again, Barta?
>>>
>>>There's that little $2 billion contingency fund you forget about,
>>>stupid.
>>
>>You think there is $2 Billion in some accessible account that a
>>president can use without congressional approval?
>>
>>There are funds available---because the account is budgeted
>>
>>THe funds need approval.
>
>
>You keep digging the Boob deeper into his spider hole
to spend the money, I get it. Meanwhile the Boob goes to Vegas for a
fundraiser.
What low life character does that show of the Thug?
Message has been deleted
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Oct 31, 2012, 9:15:44 PM10/31/12
to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:07:16 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>Obama cannot spend money the Republican congress will not give him
>
>Congress passes a budget, stupid.
Yeah stupid. Obama said in the second debate he ordered, "what ever it
takes" to rescue Ambassador Stevens, where the chain of command break
down?
Obama is bound to have the written order but won't release it because
it's been classified as Top Secret.
How convenient of the Pretender.
In March the House started Impeachment proceedings against the Boob.
They'll not doubt be adding Fast & Furious as well as Benghazi
abandonment.
>
>Congress passes a budget, stupid.
Yeah stupid. Obama said in the second debate he ordered, "what ever it
takes" to rescue Ambassador Stevens, where the chain of command break
down?
Obama is bound to have the written order but won't release it because
it's been classified as Top Secret.
How convenient of the Pretender.
In March the House started Impeachment proceedings against the Boob.
They'll not doubt be adding Fast & Furious as well as Benghazi
abandonment.
0 new messages