Romney still up in polls

[MattB]

Romney still up in polls.



http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g4eg88p47lbqltelu...@4ax.com...

> Romney still up in polls.

Where Hussein is headed come Nov:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHAf4XbffcE

-Eddie Haskell


> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
>

[3206 Dead]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB wrote:

> Romney still up in polls.

Funny how that happens when Gallup and Rasmussen report in.

But I looks like Romney is dropping like a rock in Gallup...
>
>
>
> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/
general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

[Matt]

MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:g4eg88p47lbqltelu...@4ax.com:

> Romney still up in polls.
>
>
>
> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_elect
> ion_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

All within the margin of error, though. And more importantly, President
Obama is ahead in Ohio.

It is almost like the rest of us needn't vote.

Matt

[MattB]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:51:16 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"
<hhsg...@zzzzq.com> wrote:

>
>"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:g4eg88p47lbqltelu...@4ax.com...
>
>> Romney still up in polls.
>
>Where Hussein is headed come Nov:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHAf4XbffcE
>
>-Eddie Haskell

Good one. So true.
>
>
>> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
>>
>

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:k69ds7$t3o$1...@dont-email.me...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> Romney still up in polls.
>
> Funny how that happens when Gallup and Rasmussen report in.
>
> But I looks like Romney is dropping like a rock in Gallup...

It's a shame that you are too stupid to know how stupid you are.

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:23 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> Romney still up in polls.
>
>Funny how that happens when Gallup and Rasmussen report in.
>
>But I looks like Romney is dropping like a rock in Gallup...

Still up in gallup. Don't think this last Debate had much effect on
the base of either party. Think it did on the Independents though.


>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/
>general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

[3196 Dead]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:13:25 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>

wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:23 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>
>>> Romney still up in polls.
>>
>>Funny how that happens when Gallup and Rasmussen report in.
>>
>>But I looks like Romney is dropping like a rock in Gallup...
>
>Still up in gallup. Don't think this last Debate had much effect on
>the base of either party. Think it did on the Independents though.

Gallup is playing games. They suddenly shifted criteria last week to
a format that gave Romney a three point bounce, and then tried to
pretend it was part of the bounce from the first debate.

I wonder how much of a sudden, dramatic shift we'll see in an
electorate that seems to have pretty much made its mind up we'll see
in the next 12 days in order for them to end up with results that come
within shouting distance of what the voting shows?
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/
>>general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

[Transition Zone]

On Oct 24, 2:45 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Romney still up in polls.
>

> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_ele...

No he isn't:

"....four public polls, all of which give Obama a double-digit lead
among early voters and absentee voters. The most credible of those
four, a Wall Street Journal/NBC survey, found that Obama leads by 26
points (63-37) among those who have voted already [in OHIO].
--http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/wp/2012/10/19/
spin-...

In early voting nationwide Obama leads 53-42:
<http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-campaign-poll-
idUSBR...>

[3196 Dead]

Four points in three days. My my my...
>

[Steve]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:16:30 -0700, 3196 Dead <de...@dead.dog> wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:13:25 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:23 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Romney still up in polls.
>>>
>>>Funny how that happens when Gallup and Rasmussen report in.
>>>
>>>But I looks like Romney is dropping like a rock in Gallup...
>>
>>Still up in gallup. Don't think this last Debate had much effect on
>>the base of either party. Think it did on the Independents though.
>
>Gallup is playing games. They suddenly shifted criteria last week to
>a format that gave Romney a three point bounce, and then tried to
>pretend it was part of the bounce from the first debate.

<LOL> when lefties don't like the news, they accuse the newsboy.


"No plane hit the Pentagon. I don’t know what did"
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/39d98c910d32047b?hl=en&


"The theory I've heard most often is that it was either a drone, or
perhaps a SAM."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson on what hit the Pentagon
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/7473934a15900249?hl=en&

Canyon note: Sam stands for "surface to air missile." it's a little rocket
fired from the ground to hit aircraft.

[Eddie Haskell]

"3196 Dead" <de...@dead.dog> wrote in message
news:n9jg881lj2tb39d0o...@4ax.com...

Don't tell him, folks. Just let him wonder.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"3196 Dead" <de...@dead.dog> wrote in message

news:65ig881d93i6o0qef...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:13:25 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:23 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Romney still up in polls.
>>>
>>>Funny how that happens when Gallup and Rasmussen report in.
>>>
>>>But I looks like Romney is dropping like a rock in Gallup...
>>
>>Still up in gallup. Don't think this last Debate had much effect on
>>the base of either party. Think it did on the Independents though.
>
> Gallup is playing games. They suddenly shifted criteria last week to
> a format that gave Romney a three point bounce, and then tried to
> pretend it was part of the bounce from the first debate.

Woo hoo!

Dance, baby. Dance!

Go man. Go!

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"Steve" <steven...@yahooooo.com> wrote in message
news:chjg88d0fgabhufrn...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:16:30 -0700, 3196 Dead <de...@dead.dog> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:13:25 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:23 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Romney still up in polls.
>>>>
>>>>Funny how that happens when Gallup and Rasmussen report in.
>>>>
>>>>But I looks like Romney is dropping like a rock in Gallup...
>>>
>>>Still up in gallup. Don't think this last Debate had much effect on
>>>the base of either party. Think it did on the Independents though.
>>
>>Gallup is playing games. They suddenly shifted criteria last week to
>>a format that gave Romney a three point bounce, and then tried to
>>pretend it was part of the bounce from the first debate.
>
> <LOL> when lefties don't like the news, they accuse the newsboy.

Rather pathetic is it not?

Hahahahahaha!!!

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

That is why I like this link. Shows many polls results.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

Many are rigged by both sides.

>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/
>>>general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

[MattB]

Couldn't get that link to work but did find this written today at that
site.

Romney steals narrow lead from Obama as election nears

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-campaign-poll-idUSBRE89K0A920121024

(Reuters) - Republican candidate Mitt Romney was 1 percentage point
ahead of President Barack Obama in Wednesday's Reuters/Ipsos daily
tracking poll in a presidential race that is effectively a dead heat
less than two weeks before the November 6 election.

In a reversal of Tuesday's results, Romney led Obama among likely
voters by 47 percent to 46 percent, a statistically insignificant
margin, in the four-day online tracking poll.

Obama had a lead of 53-42 percent among the 17 percent of the surveyed
registered voters who said they had already cast their vote.

Like many other polls, the rolling Reuters/Ipsos poll has shown a
tight race since shortly after the two candidates met for their first
debate on October 3. The two met for their third and last debate on
Monday and most surveyed voters said the face-off did not change their
view of either candidate.

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:2ikg8893oiaoogc22...@4ax.com...

Yasum. Ridin' that fence, boss. So nuff.

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

No telling the truth. Yes I know that offends the Teabaggers. Then I
really don't care. Voting against the Teabaggers in my State. They
suck and smell.
>
>-Eddie Haskell
>

[FirstPost]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:45:36 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:16:55 -0700 (PDT), Transition Zone
><mog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Oct 24, 2:45�pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Romney still up in polls.
>>>
>>> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_ele...
>>
>>No he isn't:
>>
>>"....four public polls, all of which give Obama a double-digit lead
>>among early voters and absentee voters. The most credible of those
>>four, a Wall Street Journal/NBC survey, found that Obama leads by 26
>>points (63-37) among those who have voted already [in OHIO].
>>--http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/wp/2012/10/19/
>>spin-...
>>
>>In early voting nationwide Obama leads 53-42:
>><http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-campaign-poll-
>>idUSBR...>
>
>
>Couldn't get that link to work but did find this written today at that
>site.

The links don;t work because Google Groupers are typically too stupid
to know that Google has been truncating urls in user posts for years
now. Notice any links posted by a Googler ends with "...".
Google doesn't want websites to track back to them as a referrer
unless they get paid for it.

[wy]

On Oct 24, 4:47 pm, FirstPost <AIOE_posters_are_all_li...@AIOE.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:45:36 -0700, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:16:55 -0700 (PDT), Transition Zone
> ><mogu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Oct 24, 2:45 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Romney still up in polls.
>
> >>>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_ele...
>
> >>No he isn't:
>
> >>"....four public polls, all of which give Obama a double-digit lead
> >>among early voters and absentee voters.  The most credible of those
> >>four, a Wall Street Journal/NBC survey, found that Obama leads by 26
> >>points (63-37) among those who have voted already [in OHIO].
> >>--http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/wp/2012/10/19/
> >>spin-...
>
> >>In early voting nationwide Obama leads 53-42:
> >><http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-campaign-poll-
> >>idUSBR...>
>
> >Couldn't get that link to work but did find this written today at that
> >site.
>
> The links don;t work because Google Groupers are typically too stupid
> to know that Google has been truncating urls in user posts for years
> now.  Notice any links posted by a Googler ends with "...".
> Google doesn't want websites to track back to them as a referrer
> unless they get paid for it.

It's not Google, it's your stupid newsreader. You're too stupid to
understand how these things work. Don't believe me? Go to Google,
click on the links, and voila! Magic.

Like I said, it's your stupid newsreader that's too illiterate to
understand links, stupid.

>
>
>
> >Romney steals narrow lead from Obama as election nears
>

> >http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-campaign-poll-idUSBR...

[3196 Dead]

And yet, oddly, no actual disputing of what I said.

Interesting, that.

BTW, today's RCP came out. Obama's in the lead again.
>

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:l8lg8890c7c2sur4b...@4ax.com...

Ass still stinging over that ass whipping I gave you I see.

Btw, why do you hate America?

The beliefs of the tea party:

"The philosophy committed to the ideal of limited government,
constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, and liberty of individuals
including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets"

The beliefs of the founders:

"The philosophy committed to the ideal of limited government,
constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, and liberty of individuals
including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets"

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"3196 Dead" <de...@dead.dog> wrote in message

news:ijlg881aaten8sat0...@4ax.com...

-3196 Dead

Shuush.. Don't tell him, folks.

Let him keep making a fool of himself.

Hahahahahahah!!

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:00:38 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"

You words on here have show the above is just Rhetoric with little
basis in fact.

Just read your post and the truth comes out.




>
>-Eddie Haskell
>

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:0omg885gldrub32t3...@4ax.com...

Pure hearsay on your part.

> Just read your post and the truth comes out.

Bingo.

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

Sorry went to google and it still didn't work

"
In early voting nationwide Obama leads 53-42:
<http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-campaign-poll-
idUSBR...>
"

Also noticed my link no longer worked. That article didn't come from
google.

Never had a problem with Agent before works fine.

[3196 Dead]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:04:54 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"

Gallup came in today for RCP. And now Obama is leading.

Funny how that works, eh?
>

[Steve]

<LOL> Romney is still up in the polls.

[MattB]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>

>wrote:
>
>>Romney still up in polls.
>

>Check CNN electoral map.


CNN is hardly a unbiased source.

[Foxtrot]

3196 Dead <de...@dead.dog> wrote:

>MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>

>>Still up in gallup. Don't think this last Debate had much effect on
>>the base of either party. Think it did on the Independents though.
>
>Gallup is playing games. They suddenly shifted criteria last week to
>a format that gave Romney a three point bounce, and then tried to
>pretend it was part of the bounce from the first debate.

Playing games?!? You're delusional. Pollsters rely 100% on their
ability to interpret public opinion. Playing games would be suicidal.

Obviously you're afraid and lying to yourself, Brain Dead. The coke
snorting dog eater is in trouble because he's not presidential
timber.

>I wonder how much of a sudden, dramatic shift we'll see in an
>electorate that seems to have pretty much made its mind up we'll see
>in the next 12 days in order for them to end up with results that come
>within shouting distance of what the voting shows?

The biggest fastest shift I've ever seen was when Romney mopped
the floor with Hussein in the first debate. Wow.

[3206 Dead]

It leans right, but it's hardly the party whore Faux News is.

But then, you're a GOOD little cultist. ANY source not approved by the
GOP must be false, right?

[3206 Dead]

Nothing to say about debates two and three?

Will Romney be posting aircraft carriers with horses and bayonets along
the Iran/Syria border?

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:36:31 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:20 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Romney still up in polls.
>>>
>>>Check CNN electoral map.
>>
>>
>> CNN is hardly a unbiased source.
>
>It leans right, but it's hardly the party whore Faux News is.

Hope you don't think I am going to defend Fox News, MSBNS now NBC,
Cnn or the Hufington Post. No they are all biased.

>
>But then, you're a GOOD little cultist. ANY source not approved by the
>GOP must be false, right?

LOL This from you? All polls are suspect as are many so called
studies.

Then again you post from TRUTH-OUT, ThinkProgress, The raw story,
and worse of all "Reader Supported News". Talk about liberal BS
(RAGS) sources.

Guess CNN is right of them. Huffington post is right of them.

[wy]

On Oct 24, 9:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:36:31 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <d...@gone.com>

> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:20 -0700, MattB wrote:
>

> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com>

> >>>wrote:
>
> >>>>Romney still up in polls.
>
> >>>Check CNN electoral map.
>
> >> CNN is hardly a unbiased source.
>
> >It leans right, but it's hardly the party whore Faux News is.
>
> Hope you don't think I am going to defend Fox News, MSBNS now NBC,
> Cnn or the Hufington Post.  No they are all biased.
>
>
>
> >But then, you're a GOOD little cultist. ANY source not approved by the
> >GOP must be false, right?
>
> LOL    This from you?   All polls are suspect as are many so called
> studies.
>
> Then again you post from TRUTH-OUT,  ThinkProgress,  The raw story,
> and worse of all "Reader Supported News".   Talk about liberal BS
> (RAGS) sources.

So I guess that means you don't believe anything any news media tells
you, then. I guess if the NY Times prints that Romney skinned cats
alive for supper while he was on his religious mission in Paris and
FOX News airs the same story and ThinkProgress joins in along with
Brietbart and thousands of other media outlets around the world to
concur, then it's not to be believed, if only because liberal sources
are distributing the same story, right?

[MattB]

Did you read the above I included Fox as being Biased. Guess you
missed that.

You need to read multiple sources to get facts on many things. Much
like the polls. That is why I like


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

Shows many different polls.

Haven't found any 1 source of news that is always non-biased.

You know one?

[wy]

> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_ele...

>
> Shows many different polls.
>
> Haven't found any 1 source of news that is always non-biased.
>
> You know one?

Even if there was one, you still wouldn't believe a word they printed
or said. That's why the brighter ones among us read multiple sources
to find the common ground in a story, relying on a few foreign sources
for even a broader perspective that eludes most American media.

[MattB]

Guess I am a "brighter one" as that is what I said to do in my reply
to you. Thanks for the compliment.

[3206 Dead]

Raw Story is sometimes suspect: I don't rely on them much these days. I
pass along stories from Agence-France and sometimes AP that they carry.
Truth-Out and Think Progress are advocacy sites, and I make no apology
for posting from them. I'll put their records for fairness and accuracy
up against any of your GOP sources any day of the week.

Reader Supported News is both an aggregator and an opinion site. It does
an excellent job at both, and for all the whining righties here do about
the site, I notice nobody has ever pointed to anything of theirs I've
posted here and said, "That's wrong and here's why".

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:43:03 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

<LOL> ...and of course, Zepp would insist that he be the judge... and
his judgments would be based on his fantasies.

>Reader Supported News is both an aggregator and an opinion site. It does
>an excellent job at both, and for all the whining righties here do about
>the site, I notice nobody has ever pointed to anything of theirs I've
>posted here and said, "That's wrong and here's why".

Once one has determined that it is a leftist propaganda site, as I
have done, you simply don't bother to read it.
--
"Big Bear is important to sailors since above about 30 North,
it's ALWAYS in the night sky."
--David (Zepp) Jamieson Jan 22,2011
Stupidly and incorrectly trying to explain why the big dipper
is important to navigation
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/5bc4318a5b94d64c?hl=en&

[Phlip]

On Oct 24, 11:45 am, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Romney still up in polls.
>

> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_ele...

you nutjobs need to prepare yourselves for states that never picked a
Dem president before going with Obama.

http://t.co/jGVyIP6q

Poll: Obama Crosses 50 Percent, Opens Up 5-Point Lead In Virginia

TOM KLUDT 8:15 AM EDT, THURSDAY OCTOBER 25, 2012

President Barack Obama's lead in Virginia has extended to 5 points,
according to the latest survey from Democratic-leaning Public Policy
Polling released on Thursday.

Obama leads Mitt Romney among likely Commonwealth voters 51 percent to
46 percent — a jump from PPP's survey of Virginia a week ago, which
showed the president nursing a 2-point lead. More than half of
Virginia voters, 51 percent, have a favorable opinion of Obama
compared. Conversely, the same percentage has an unfavorable view of
Romney.

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:k6a5d5$f3q$4...@dont-email.me...

Wouldn't it be better to just sit this one out than to chime in make an
utter fool of yourself this way?

Pathetic..

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"Where's all the China Blue food?" <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:chine.bleu-48D03...@news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <e53h88piae2ilfjdc...@4ax.com>,

> Foxtrot <fox...@null.com> wrote:
>
>> The biggest fastest shift I've ever seen was when Romney mopped
>> the floor with Hussein in the first debate. Wow.
>

> So you don't mind the way Romney shifted on every position he has held so
> steadfastly for the last eleven months? I wonder what positions he will
> hold
> eleven months from now.

You parrot your DNC talking points designed to cover for the fact that
Hussein a pathological liar like a good little Hussein Youth so well. If you
want to know what dumb bastards like you are going to post in here just turn
on the TV and listen to Debbie Wassermann Slut lie her whore ass off and
then vadda ving, here you are.

Just so stupid it's goddamned unreal.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message

news:k6a52v$f3q$2...@dont-email.me...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:20 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Romney still up in polls.
>>>
>>>Check CNN electoral map.
>>
>>
>> CNN is hardly a unbiased source.
>
> It leans right,

You lean lie.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:al6h88199l2vaseuk...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:36:31 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:20 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Romney still up in polls.
>>>>
>>>>Check CNN electoral map.
>>>
>>>
>>> CNN is hardly a unbiased source.
>>
>>It leans right, but it's hardly the party whore Faux News is.
>
> Hope you don't think I am going to defend Fox News,

Of course not. That would take a pair of balls.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"wy" <w...@myself.com> wrote in message
news:2b3aabe7-df23-48f5...@q4g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...

On Oct 24, 9:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:36:31 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <d...@gone.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:20 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com>
> >>>wrote:
>
> >>>>Romney still up in polls.
>
> >>>Check CNN electoral map.
>
> >> CNN is hardly a unbiased source.
>
> >It leans right, but it's hardly the party whore Faux News is.
>
> Hope you don't think I am going to defend Fox News, MSBNS now NBC,
> Cnn or the Hufington Post. No they are all biased.
>
>
>
> >But then, you're a GOOD little cultist. ANY source not approved by the
> >GOP must be false, right?
>
> LOL This from you? All polls are suspect as are many so called
> studies.
>
> Then again you post from TRUTH-OUT, ThinkProgress, The raw story,
> and worse of all "Reader Supported News". Talk about liberal BS
> (RAGS) sources.

> So I guess that means you don't believe anything any news media tells
> you, then. I guess if the NY Times prints that Romney skinned cats
> alive for supper

Then we'd know that Hussein is the one guilty.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:t28h88thj7bu117tn...@4ax.com...

Sucking his dick to seem above the fray will get you accolades from no one.
He'll disdain your cowardice just as I do.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"wy" <w...@myself.com> wrote in message

news:05611d9f-d427-451f...@l12g2000vbj.googlegroups.com...

You rely on the MSM echo chamber that's no more than an arm of the DNC.
That's why they went out and parroted the spontaneous protest against a
video narrative in unison like dutiful little Goebbels dick suckers while
Fox and talk radio forced them into finally reporting some of the facts,
namely, that Hussein lied his fucking ass off as usual.

LIED HIS ASS OFF.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:k39h8858n90e2rb3d...@4ax.com...

Who had the Libyan attack story correct while the entire MSM was parroting
the WH narrative lie?

Careful, this might balls..

Aw, fuck it. I'll shove it up your fence riding ass. It was Fox News and
conservative talk radio.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"3206 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message

news:k6a8vm$nou$3...@dont-email.me...

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:08 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:36:31 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:20 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Romney still up in polls.
>>>>>
>>>>>Check CNN electoral map.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> CNN is hardly a unbiased source.
>>>
>>>It leans right, but it's hardly the party whore Faux News is.
>>
>> Hope you don't think I am going to defend Fox News, MSBNS now NBC, Cnn
>> or the Hufington Post. No they are all biased.
>>
>>
>>>But then, you're a GOOD little cultist. ANY source not approved by the
>>>GOP must be false, right?
>>
>> LOL This from you? All polls are suspect as are many so called
>> studies.
>>
>> Then again you post from TRUTH-OUT, ThinkProgress, The raw story,
>> and worse of all "Reader Supported News". Talk about liberal BS (RAGS)
>> sources.
>
> Raw Story is sometimes suspect: I don't rely on them much these days. I

> pass along stories from Agence-France..

..pravda, the ministry of information and the DNC.

That because you love being lied to almost as much as you love to lie.

-Eddie Haskell

[Barbarian Mutual]

Right wingers don't care a damn about the facts, though.

[3206 Dead]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:31:46 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:20 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>

>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Romney still up in polls.
>>>

>>>Check CNN electoral map.
>>
>>
>>CNN is hardly a unbiased source.
>

> Only ONE (1) site does not have the electoral map scenario laid out and
> the several possibilities REQUIRED to win an election.
>
> In ALL cases (except faux, but I don't watch faux)--they have an almost
> 70% probabliity of Obama re-election (based on electoral votes), and the
> slim-to-narrow chance that Rumney can attain 270 votes.

Even Intrade has Obama with a clear lead, and that was after some big buy-
ins by Romney supporters last week to shift the trading prices in
Romney's favor.

[MattB]

Fox isn't often a good source. Beck seldom one, Limbaugh never.
Limbaugh has gone insane.

I consider Glenn Beck and Rachel Maddow to be about the same in
integrity.
Linbaugh is more like a cross between Al Sharpton and Pat Roberson,
with a little Fred Phelps mixed in.


>
>-Eddie Haskell
>

[MattB]

Eddie go call your Teabagger Cell leader. He'll come over and you can
bend over. Then you can both lick Santorum. :-((


>
>-Eddie Haskell
>

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:5pui8817ii01dkotu...@4ax.com...

Cite?

> Beck seldom one,

Cite?

> Limbaugh never.

Cite?

> Limbaugh has gone insane.

Cite?

> I consider Glenn Beck and Rachel Maddow to be about the same in
> integrity.

Cite?

> Linbaugh is more like a cross between Al Sharpton and Pat Roberson,
> with a little Fred Phelps mixed in.

Cite?

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:63vi88lkg90hh5sps...@4ax.com...

I knew you didn't have the balls. Now, again, pull that fence post out of
your ass and answer the previous question. Who had the Libyan terrorist
attack story correct while the entire MSM was regurgitating the WH narrative
lie they were spoon fed like the dumb biased bastards that they are?

Answer:

Fox News.

Rush Limbaugh.

Sean Hannity.

Glenn Beck.

Now, squeal you little WA state don't know your ass from a hole in the
ground fence riding cowardly little piggy.

Squeal! Squeal! Squeal!

MattB: But bubaddy but but people up here are so insulated and stupid they'd
think less of me if I told the truth so I'm too scared.

Bock bock bock ba-cock!

-Eddie Haskell

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:43:38 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:

Zepp. I'm just having fun with my Stalker Gary. I have seen many of
these. Obama has had a lead for months. Yet Romney could still win.

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:53:49 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"

It is common knowledge

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:10:17 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"

Teabagger and truth. They don't go together. By the next election
Tea party will be a bad memory.

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:25:15 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>

wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:43:38 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:31:46 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:20 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:34:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:52:26 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Romney still up in polls.
>>>>>
>>>>>Check CNN electoral map.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>CNN is hardly a unbiased source.
>>>
>>> Only ONE (1) site does not have the electoral map scenario laid out and
>>> the several possibilities REQUIRED to win an election.
>>>
>>> In ALL cases (except faux, but I don't watch faux)--they have an almost
>>> 70% probabliity of Obama re-election (based on electoral votes), and the
>>> slim-to-narrow chance that Rumney can attain 270 votes.
>>
>>Even Intrade has Obama with a clear lead, and that was after some big buy-
>>ins by Romney supporters last week to shift the trading prices in
>>Romney's favor.
>
>
>Zepp. I'm just having fun with my Stalker Gary. I have seen many of
>these. Obama has had a lead for months. Yet Romney could still win.
>

The polling has shown that Romney's numbers are on the upswing. Time
will tell if it will continue. The Democrats are running scared.

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:45:02 -0400, Steve <steven...@yahooooo.com>

They do seem a bit desperate.

[3206 Dead]

Upswing this, Steve: www.fivethirtyeight.com

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:ev1j88dsrp07s61le...@4ax.com...

Yeah, that you can't back up your shit.

Thanks for the demonstration.

You may take your seat now.

I win again.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"MattB" <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:t12j88thdqbjkfegc...@4ax.com...

That's it. Squeal some more.

Squeal! Squeal! Squeal!

-Eddie Haskell

[3206 Dead]

Yup. Leafs could win the Stanley Cup next spring, too. That's the great
thing about the future: anything's possible.

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:53:43 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

<ROTFLMAO> Leftists blogs are to make you feel good. Nobody else
pays any attention you pathetic, sad loser...

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:58:14 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>

The little Obama booklet he calls his "plan" is evidence of that...
<LOL> released two weeks before the election.

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:03:03 -0400, Steve <steven...@yahooooo.com>

Yes and look and reads like a propaganda tool. Hitler would be
impressed.

[3206 Dead]

Compared to Romney's which will be released two weeks after the
election. Maybe.

>
>
> Yes and look and reads like a propaganda tool. Hitler would be
> impressed.

Got you on the run, does it?

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:45:36 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:52:21 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:

>
>>
>>I consider Glenn Beck and Rachel Maddow to be about the same in
>>integrity.
>

>OF COURSE you do, MATTLOON
>
>That's the most clear evidence of WHY you're a moron.
>
>No one short of a halfwit would compare what Beck is, and does, with
>what Maddow does.
>
>Only you would equate the two.
>
>
>>===========================================================
>
>
>
>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:07:31 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>
>
>Yep I did and proud of it, did it to there faces and they did it to
>mine. That was/is a thing.
>
>Yes and you still don't understand doubt you care to.
>
>>So---Like Charley Barta---(calling people niggers)---it's all because
>>someone doesn't understand?
>
>I've called a Black man nigger did so for years


LOL Notice you cut out most of what was said. Normal liberal
honesty.

Original

""I've called a Black man nigger did so for years. He called me
Whitey, Honkey and peckerwood. Didn't like peckerwood because the
other Blacks laughed. This was before Internet so took me a while to
learn what it meant. Never got him back for that. Going to have to
work on that for our next meeting.

We were/are all like brothers. A bond beyond your racist
understanding."'

We did this for years and neither was offended. We both knew the
other wasn't racist. He was armed too.

Well thanks for showing everyone how honest a true Obama supporter is.

So let see you cut out most the original and the changed the subject
line so they couldn't see it. Good Work Gary.

Link to original

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/d4e9391b45a6c718?hl=en&dmode=source

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:45:01 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

<LOL> Romney is still ahead. I'm really looking forward to this
election. By the way, when are we going to hear more about your book?
>LOL> Oh wait...

[3206 Dead]

Not according to most polls.

I'm really looking forward to this
> election. By the way, when are we going to hear more about your book?

Oh, probably in a month or so. It's in the hands of the beta writers now.
>>LOL> Oh wait...

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:43:45 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

This shows as of today he is

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:43:45 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

Oh yes, according to most polls, he's up by two or three.

<chuckle> Really, Porks, you need to read something besides those
silly leftist propaganda sites.

>I'm really looking forward to this
>> election. By the way, when are we going to hear more about your book?
>
>Oh, probably in a month or so. It's in the hands of the beta writers now.

"Beta writers???" You mean you have a bunch of amateurs trying to
clean up your drivel? Oh well, you don't have a wife anymore to try
to make you appear coherent, do you?

>>>LOL> Oh wait...

Poor Porky, You're never going to be successful at anything. You are
the personification of the term "chronic loser."

[3206 Dead]

Sure. Rasmussen and the WaHoPo weighed in with their weighted polls.

Of course that give Romney a nudge upwards. Ain't real, though.

[3206 Dead]

My wife is my copy editor.

I take it you don't know what a beta reader is. He's someone who first
reads the book casually, to see if it's even worth bothering with. Now,
it's entirely possible that my beta writers will come back and say,
"Dude, this is an unreadable mess", at which point the project is still-
born. They actually have an incentive to do this, since that saves them
some work.

If they decide it's worth dicking with, then they evaluate it from
various perspectives. There's a fair bit of math behind it, and two of
them will be double checking my figures and making sure I don't have any
absurdities. Two others, writers in their own right, will be checking
for consistency and looking to see if the characters are believable and
if readers will relate to them. Two writers, two engineers. I've known
them an aggregate of 120 years, and they're familiar with my work.
Couldn't ask for better. I'm very lucky.

There is one thing I do know about my book: it's better than anything
you've ever written.

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:34:05 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

Oh really, and she forgives you for refusing to let her use your
internet provider?

"Unsubbing for now... need new ISP"
"Hope to be back online at the new address in at most two weeks.
"Sorry I vanished like that -- this year has been a troublesome one.
But things seem to be improving now. Looking forward to rejoing y'all
Real
Soon Now!!"

"Greywolf, alive and promising to return "

Greywolf the Wanderer Oct 1 2002, 7:55 am
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.startrek.creative.erotica.moderated/msg/8bda37c3d3c22221?hl=en

>I take it you don't know what a beta reader is. He's someone who first
>reads the book casually, to see if it's even worth bothering with. Now,
>it's entirely possible that my beta writers will come back and say,
>"Dude, this is an unreadable mess", at which point the project is still-
>born. They actually have an incentive to do this, since that saves them
>some work.
>
>If they decide it's worth dicking with, then they evaluate it from
>various perspectives. There's a fair bit of math behind it, and two of
>them will be double checking my figures and making sure I don't have any
>absurdities. Two others, writers in their own right, will be checking
>for consistency and looking to see if the characters are believable and
>if readers will relate to them. Two writers, two engineers. I've known
>them an aggregate of 120 years, and they're familiar with my work.
>Couldn't ask for better. I'm very lucky.

I'm sure they are a bunch of fruitcakes.. much like you

>There is one thing I do know about my book: it's better than anything
>you've ever written.

<ROTFL> Yu really don't know anything of the kind, Wordsong. Hard
cold fact is that I'm pretty sure that I can do anything of
significance better than you. Have you ver done anything of
significance?

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:24:27 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

<LOL> Yeah, sure, all the polls are crooked...
Let's review Zepp's previous predictions.

"I'm beginning to wonder if my forecast of 400 electoral votes for Gore isn't being a bit conservative."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson 2000-08-23
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=7lk7qsghrt59opk4d7khi5of6ukkhcirk6%404ax.com

"Arnie is limping along on name recognition, but it's become
clear that his campaign is an utter fiasco, and his role in
this election is that of being the biggest clown."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson 2003-09-08
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=bukqlv0922p8s501bdb0ct4i419hmvacdr%404ax.com

"Looks like I'm no longer the only one predicting an electoral vote blowout for Kerry."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson Oct 20 2004

"In any event, the worst total I see for Kerry at this time is
288 Electoral votes, a comfortable margin. He could conceivably get as many as 346."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson 8 Oct 2004
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/5bedfa7f2909d2e9?dmode=source&hl=en



"I think the Pubs will get 40-45 House seats, and five Senate seats."
-- David (Zepp) Jamieson Mon, Nov 1, 2010

[3206 Dead]

My personal life is out of bounds. Period.

>
> "Unsubbing for now... need new ISP"
> "Hope to be back online at the new address in at most two weeks.
> "Sorry I vanished like that -- this year has been a troublesome one.
> But things seem to be improving now. Looking forward to rejoing y'all
> Real Soon Now!!"
>

Forwarded.

Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-
september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!
news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!
border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!
local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!
not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:51:51 -0500
From: Steve <steven...@yahooooo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.liberalism,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-
limbaugh,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.democrats
Subject: Re: Romney still up in polls
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:51:44 -0400
Message-ID: <shjj88tqrdbo5tled...@4ax.com>
References: <nnti88h9c31dvop54...@4ax.com>
<k6btoa$212$1...@dont-email.me>
<ds0j88p4q3467fo9k...@4ax.com>
<822j88ld0ig6efpst...@4ax.com>
<jt2j8899bfl882ldl...@4ax.com>
<323j88htav2ok9ioi...@4ax.com>
<mq3j88d57nvqpm429...@4ax.com> <k6cbst$s1f$3@dont-
email.me>
<bsdj889e1f0nt06gm...@4ax.com> <k6cfb1$s1f$8@dont-
email.me>
<c6hj88leuntt0pf9n...@4ax.com> <k6ci9d$mnf$3@dont-
email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 157
X-Trace: sv3-
sULj8J3pEzJeDZWFwBAdwVztBVwEudIfqvK8H3qGifF1ubn1Uchqap6toCaHUHQZ2
+LdSYgwgfv38L3!LqxgawXdgr/i9Hg6zjWi+EvizDM2JEV2o9zHDviwg8vWCE
+OSOjpospCcxm1kwUfCJBsRO8OHKAx!AYGGjA==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint
properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 7392
X-Received-Bytes: 7533
Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.liberalism:435178
alt.society.liberalism:486896 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1168610
alt.politics.usa.republican:190140 alt.politics.democrats:410283
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

784.048 Stalking; definitions; penalties.—
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Harass” means to engage in a course of conduct directed at a
specific person which causes substantial emotional distress to that
person and serves no legitimate purpose.
(b) “Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct composed of a series
of acts over a period of time, however short, which evidences a
continuity of purpose. The term does not include constitutionally
protected activity such as picketing or other organized protests.
(c) “Credible threat” means a verbal or nonverbal threat, or a
combination of the two, including threats delivered by electronic
communication or implied by a pattern of conduct, which places the person
who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety
or the safety of his or her family members or individuals closely
associated with the person, and which is made with the apparent ability
to carry out the threat to cause such harm. It is not necessary to prove
that the person making the threat had the intent to actually carry out
the threat. The present incarceration of the person making the threat is
not a bar to prosecution under this section.
(d) “Cyberstalk” means to engage in a course of conduct to communicate,
or to cause to be communicated, words, images, or language by or through
the use of electronic mail or electronic communication, directed at a
specific person, causing substantial emotional distress to that person
and serving no legitimate purpose.
(2) A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows,
harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking,
a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082
or s. 775.083.
(3) A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows,
harasses, or cyberstalks another person and makes a credible threat to
that person commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the
third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
775.084.
(4) A person who, after an injunction for protection against repeat
violence, sexual violence, or dating violence pursuant to s. 784.046, or
an injunction for protection against domestic violence pursuant to s.
741.30, or after any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward
the subject person or that person’s property, knowingly, willfully,
maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another
person commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(5) A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows,
harasses, or cyberstalks a child under 16 years of age commits the
offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable
as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(6) A law enforcement officer may arrest, without a warrant, any person
that he or she has probable cause to believe has violated this section.
(7) A person who, after having been sentenced for a violation of s.
794.011, s. 800.04, or s. 847.0135(5) and prohibited from contacting the
victim of the offense under s. 921.244, willfully, maliciously, and
repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks the victim commits the
offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable
as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(8) The punishment imposed under this section shall run consecutive to
any former sentence imposed for a conviction for any offense under s.
794.011, s. 800.04, or s. 847.0135(5).
(9)(a) The sentencing court shall consider, as a part of any sentence,
issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact with the
victim, which may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the
court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any such
order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the
probability of future violations by the perpetrator, and the safety of
the victim and his or her family members or individuals closely
associated with the victim.
(b) The order may be issued by the court even if the defendant is
sentenced to a state prison or a county jail or even if the imposition of
the sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation.
History.—s. 1, ch. 92-208; s. 29, ch. 94-134; s. 29, ch. 94-135; s. 2,
ch. 97-27; s. 23, ch. 2002-55; s. 1, ch. 2003-23; s. 3, ch. 2004-17; s.
3, ch. 2004-256; s. 17, ch. 2008-172; s. 2, ch. 201

[Steve]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:58:58 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

Well, hell, Porks, you're the one that claimed she was your copy
editor.

but then, I doubt you have much of a personal life.

>> "Unsubbing for now... need new ISP"
>> "Hope to be back online at the new address in at most two weeks.
>> "Sorry I vanished like that -- this year has been a troublesome one.
>> But things seem to be improving now. Looking forward to rejoing y'all
>> Real Soon Now!!"

>> "Greywolf, alive and promising to return "
>>
>> Greywolf the Wanderer Oct 1 2002, 7:55 am
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.startrek.creative.erotica.moderated/
>msg/8bda37c3d3c22221?hl=en

She must have been very forgiving...

>Forwarded.

<chuckles>

>784.048?Stalking; definitions; penalties.—
>(1)?As used in this section, the term:
>(a)?“Harass” means to engage in a course of conduct directed at a

>specific person which causes substantial emotional distress to that
>person and serves no legitimate purpose.

>(b)?“Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct composed of a series

>of acts over a period of time, however short, which evidences a
>continuity of purpose. The term does not include constitutionally
>protected activity such as picketing or other organized protests.

>(c)?“Credible threat” means a verbal or nonverbal threat, or a

>combination of the two, including threats delivered by electronic
>communication or implied by a pattern of conduct, which places the person
>who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety
>or the safety of his or her family members or individuals closely
>associated with the person, and which is made with the apparent ability
>to carry out the threat to cause such harm. It is not necessary to prove
>that the person making the threat had the intent to actually carry out
>the threat. The present incarceration of the person making the threat is
>not a bar to prosecution under this section.

>(d)?“Cyberstalk” means to engage in a course of conduct to communicate,

>or to cause to be communicated, words, images, or language by or through
>the use of electronic mail or electronic communication, directed at a
>specific person, causing substantial emotional distress to that person
>and serving no legitimate purpose.

>(2)?A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows,

>harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking,
>a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082
>or s. 775.083.

>(3)?A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows,

>harasses, or cyberstalks another person and makes a credible threat to
>that person commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the
>third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
>775.084.

>(4)?A person who, after an injunction for protection against repeat

>violence, sexual violence, or dating violence pursuant to s. 784.046, or
>an injunction for protection against domestic violence pursuant to s.
>741.30, or after any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward
>the subject person or that person’s property, knowingly, willfully,
>maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another
>person commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third
>degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

>(5)?A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows,

>harasses, or cyberstalks a child under 16 years of age commits the
>offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable
>as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

>(6)?A law enforcement officer may arrest, without a warrant, any person

>that he or she has probable cause to believe has violated this section.

>(7)?A person who, after having been sentenced for a violation of s.

>794.011, s. 800.04, or s. 847.0135(5) and prohibited from contacting the
>victim of the offense under s. 921.244, willfully, maliciously, and
>repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks the victim commits the
>offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable
>as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

>(8)?The punishment imposed under this section shall run consecutive to

>any former sentence imposed for a conviction for any offense under s.
>794.011, s. 800.04, or s. 847.0135(5).

>(9)(a)?The sentencing court shall consider, as a part of any sentence,

>issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact with the
>victim, which may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the
>court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any such
>order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the
>probability of future violations by the perpetrator, and the safety of
>the victim and his or her family members or individuals closely
>associated with the victim.

>(b)?The order may be issued by the court even if the defendant is

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:24:27 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

So again a liberal that shows his dishonesty.

Polls listed are

Rasmussen Reports
ABC News/Wash Post 1
IBD/TIPP
Gallup
Associated Press/GfK
Monmouth/SurveyUSA/Braun
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl
CBS News
WashTimes/JZ Analytics*
Politico/GWU/Battleground

Those and more.

Want to try another deception in the name of Obama?

[3206 Dead]

No need. All you have to do is look at the Rasmussen graph and see the
steady weekly rise and fall.

[MattB]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:38:42 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>

What you don't believe that happens?

Point is I looked at a few and it has been up nd down much. That
first Debate seems to have really effected things and the last.

What poll do you suggest?

[Gronk]

MattB wrote:
> Romney still up in polls.
>
>
>

> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
>

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/25/oct-24-in-polls-romneys-momentum-seems-to-have-stopped/#more-36636

[MattB]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:43:19 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:09:37 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>

>>>I've called a Black man nigger did so for years
>>
>>
>>LOL Notice you cut out most of what was said. Normal liberal
>>honesty.



LOL Notice you cut out most of what was said. Normal liberal
honesty.

Original

""I've called a Black man nigger did so for years. He called me
Whitey, Honkey and peckerwood. Didn't like peckerwood because the
other Blacks laughed. This was before Internet so took me a while to
learn what it meant. Never got him back for that. Going to have to
work on that for our next meeting.

We were/are all like brothers. A bond beyond your racist
understanding."'

We did this for years and neither was offended. We both knew the
other wasn't racist. He was armed too.

Well thanks for showing everyone how honest a true Obama supporter is.

So let see you cut out most the original and the changed the subject
line so they couldn't see it. Good Work Gary.

Link to original

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/d4e9391b45a6c718?hl=en&dmode=source

Why do you take it out of context.

Neither he or I considered it a racial slur. Just you of the everyone
owes you club.

Notice you did not consider what I was called a slur. Strange that.

[3206 Dead]

The best is Nate Silver, who was dead-on in the last presidential
election and closer than anyone else in the 2010 Congressional races.

[3206 Dead]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:37:06 -0700, MattB wrote:

The best is Nate Silver, who was dead-on in the last presidential
election and closer than anyone else in the 2010 Congressional races.
>
>
>
>>>
>>>

[MattB]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:47:19 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:

Snipped for space.

>>
>> What poll do you suggest?
>
>The best is Nate Silver, who was dead-on in the last presidential
>election and closer than anyone else in the 2010 Congressional races.

Been reading his stuff not bad. If he is right no matter how it
turns out will be a close race. Congress won't change much.


Sucks for Americans.