>> "clairbear" <clairbearKnowsSid...@Verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA05167956D4A3clairbear@216.196.97.142...
>>> "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in
>>> news:jolks0$kr6$1@dont-email.me:

>>>> "clairbear" <clairbearKnowsSid...@Verizon.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsA050EB16D5668clairbear@216.196.97.142...
>>>>> "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:jokg43$kcv$1@dont-email.me:

>>>>>> "Lamont Cranston" <Fri...@Umbra.org> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:jokfqu$p5s$8@news.datemas.de...
>>>>>>> On 5/10/2012 1:57 PM, clairbear wrote:
>>>>>>>> "First.Post"<OccupierDumberThanD...@invalid.org>  wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:XnsA04F9ED1B8CA6OccupierDumber@88.198.244.100:

>>>>>>>>> clairbear<clairb...@msn.com>  wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:XnsA04FA304BE7F7clairbear@216.196.97.142:

>>>>>>>>>> jim<"sjedgingN0Sp"@m@mwt,net>  wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:Z-qdnf6chbu4lzHSnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@bright.net:

>>>>>>>>>>> clairbear wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Debt was a bad Idea Under Bush and the the 110th dem
>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled congress when it shot up dramatically , Itwas bad
>>>>>>>>>>>> before that, It's gotten far, far worse

>>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless when the time comes you will embrace the
>>>>>>>>>>> federal debt.

>>>>>>>>>> You do even begin to know who or what I am. But we know what
>>>>>>>>>> your are Just by the FACT that you edit out reference to you
>>>>>>>>>> hero and his saying ho wbad the debt was before HE RAN UP $5
>>>>>>>>>> TRILLION worth of debt in less than 4 years  NOW be a good
>>>>>>>>>> little liberal HYPOCRITE AND ERASE THAT BEFORE YOU REPLY and
>>>>>>>>>> that will cofirm all doubt of what a HYPOCRITE you are

>>>>>>>>> More of a complete idiot than a hypocrite considering the goof
>>>>>>>>> believes that the federal debt is irrellevant to anything and
>>>>>>>>> means nothing. Yeah yeah, sure sure, he preaches that the
>>>>>>>>> government debt doesn't matter as long as his liberal messiah
>>>>>>>>> is in office but watch his opinion change after the election
>>>>>>>>> and a Republican sits in the whitehouse.

>>>>>>>> Yeah it like that oft misattributed remarks "a billion here, a
>>>>>>>> billion there ans soon your talking real money" No debt is good
>>>>>>>> debt unless it something you can reasonably pay back whether it
>>>>>>>> be personal , business , state of national debt. Problem is with
>>>>>>>> so many sucking at the federal teat
>>>>>>>> deficit spending has become a peramnent thing. Imagine if you
>>>>>>>> lived you personal always borrowing more than you can pay back
>>>>>>>> where would you be, Thats where we are headed as a nation if
>>>>>>>> thing don't change Speaking of change remember thos promises of
>>>>>>>> and slogans of 4 years ago, Change Hope and Transparency. we got
>>>>>>>> none in fact we got almost the opposite, now the sloagn is
>>>>>>>> Forward. If past is prolog we a need to be very
>>>>>>>> concerned.

>>>>>>> Please, please take an English class.

>>>>>> Clair's logic and economics are bad, too.
>>>>> Wrong
>>>>>> Home schooled?
>>>>> Wrong
>>>>>> Went to school in a state of the former confederacy?
>>>>> Wrong
>>>>>> ALL debt is NOT bad.
>>>>> To quote Polonius to his son Laertes
>>>>> Neither a borrower nor a lender be,
>>>>> For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
>>>>> And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.

>>>>> National debt at the levels of the last foive years is very bad
>>>>> Ever since the begining of the 110th congress the debt has been
>>>>> rising at a
>>>>> runaway rate
>>>>> Only a horses ass would defend what the 110th and 111th congresses
>>>>> and Obama have done to the debt And before you go off on bush rant
>>>>> he was  in part resposible for letting the dems of the 110th run up
>>>>> the tab

>>>> Debt and deficits are crises only when a Democrat is in the White
>>>> House.

>>>> These were just fine when St Reagan of the spend and borrow school
>>>> was president
>>>> These were just fine when bush,jr had two unfunded wars (off budget)

>>>> What a bunch of hypocrites!

>>> Massive debt is bad no matter who is  the Whitehouse but lets not
>>> forget who controls writing budgets, the congess and who was in
>>> control of congress During the recent upward movement of the debt the
>>> dems held both or one house of congess when the republicsn cotrolled
>>> both houses under clinton and bush the Debt to GDP ration trended
>>> down. Since the start of 110Th, through the 112th(no budget congress)
>>> the dems controlled both houses now the control the senate. The same
>>> senate that refused to bring the budget to the floor for a vote.
>> .
>> .
>> .

>> "Massive debt is bad no matter who is  the Whitehouse" is nonsense.
>> That's a knee jerk reaction and a demonstration of a lack of knowledge
>> about what debt is all about.
> Tell that to the people with upside down mortgages Any time you borrow
> more tha you can reasonably pay back THAT IS BAD DEBT. Our government
> has no clue as to how to pay back debt at levels we have without
> bankrupting the entire nation
>> Much of the debt represents assets of the United States government.
>> There is good debt and there is bad debt.
> Got bad news  for you We dropped the gold standard some 40years  ago and
> our government does not have assets worth what the debt is
>> Borrowing to build the interstate highway system is good debt since it
>> provides an asset.
> That was 60 years ago in the post war boom years and the debt was held
> mostly by US citizens.
>> Borrowing to fund an unneeded war destructive to American interests is
>> bad debt.
> Forgot what happened when we let our guard down in the years leading up
> to 911 I guess you would have been happy to let the terrorist  continue
> to come here and kill our fellow citizens BTW how's that Gitmo shutdown
> going But at least Obama personally killed Osama... non...no that was
> the navy seals, Obama just took all the credit for it
>> Incurring debt during a recession is good.
> Go out and max out you credit cards  the go apply for more and max them
> out  Then tell us how good that debt is on your fixed income
>> Incurring debt, the way bush,jr did it is bad.
> Debt rose dramatically when the dems took over congress Congress writes
> and authorizes the budget. not the dems had 2 years with no budget and
> the dems controlled senate won't even vote on the budget, Obama is
> president while the debt has increased by almost 50% So by YOUR
> Standards that make the way Obama did it is extremely bad.
> Our government both dems and republicans have really let thing get out
> of control
>> It's not a party issue, it's an economic issue that transcends party
> The way you only blame one party shows that you are either lieing,
> stupid or just plain have no idea what your fingers are type.
>> You RRRs love to slap your silly labels on things without regard to
>> the meaning of the words.