Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Conservatives Must Become Liberals
78 views
Skip to first unread message
Tracey12
Nov 7, 2012, 7:07:09 AM11/7/12
to
According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
the very liberal democrat party.
Never in a 1000 years!!!
We Conservatives must do all we can to stop the forward march of
socialism and communism, as well as globalism.
Never ever give in! Never comply! Never conform!
Our values are the right values. Obama won by a slim margin. At least
half of America agrees with us. Now we must teach those who do not
know the difference between the radical left and Conservatism.
NEVER GIVE IN NO MATTER WHAT THE LEFT SAYS!
be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
the very liberal democrat party.
Never in a 1000 years!!!
We Conservatives must do all we can to stop the forward march of
socialism and communism, as well as globalism.
Never ever give in! Never comply! Never conform!
Our values are the right values. Obama won by a slim margin. At least
half of America agrees with us. Now we must teach those who do not
know the difference between the radical left and Conservatism.
NEVER GIVE IN NO MATTER WHAT THE LEFT SAYS!
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
Nov 7, 2012, 8:05:15 AM11/7/12
to
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>the very liberal democrat party.
According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>the very liberal democrat party.
and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
Obama has a MANDATE.
Tracey12
Nov 7, 2012, 8:30:02 AM11/7/12
to
On Nov 7, 7:05 am, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
Even before Obamacare kicks in fully, Obama is running up a 1.2
Trillion dollar increase in the debt each year. In four more, that
will add 5 Trillion more to the 6 Trillion he's already racked up.
And, we are not counting the costs of Obamacare or any other insanity
he might pass.
Therefore, in 4 years, our debt will be the current 16 Trillion plus
an additional 5 Trillion at the very minimum.
With 21 Trillion in debt, our GDP won't touch it since its only 14 to
15 Trillion per year. We will be fully bankrupt and since we are
already using the Federal Reserve to print money for a large portion
of the annual deficit, we may not find anyone who will loan us a
dime. At that point, the USD crashes in value, and the Obama
Depression will look like a nothing compared to the horrible economic
disaster that we will face then.
I beg someone to tell me how we avoid this event. Many are saying it
is going to happen.
<PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>
> Obama has a MANDATE.
Obama has a headache,
> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>
> Obama has a MANDATE.
Even before Obamacare kicks in fully, Obama is running up a 1.2
Trillion dollar increase in the debt each year. In four more, that
will add 5 Trillion more to the 6 Trillion he's already racked up.
And, we are not counting the costs of Obamacare or any other insanity
he might pass.
Therefore, in 4 years, our debt will be the current 16 Trillion plus
an additional 5 Trillion at the very minimum.
With 21 Trillion in debt, our GDP won't touch it since its only 14 to
15 Trillion per year. We will be fully bankrupt and since we are
already using the Federal Reserve to print money for a large portion
of the annual deficit, we may not find anyone who will loan us a
dime. At that point, the USD crashes in value, and the Obama
Depression will look like a nothing compared to the horrible economic
disaster that we will face then.
I beg someone to tell me how we avoid this event. Many are saying it
is going to happen.
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 7, 2012, 8:33:23 AM11/7/12
to
On Nov 7, 6:07 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
> the very liberal democrat party.
>
> Never in a 1000 years!!!
No need to wait that long - Just do the natural thing which is to die.
> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
> the very liberal democrat party.
>
> Never in a 1000 years!!!
You people are failing badly in your attempts to pass your hatred unto
your descendants.
-Ramon
Tracey12
Nov 7, 2012, 8:35:51 AM11/7/12
to
David Hartung
Nov 7, 2012, 9:22:03 AM11/7/12
to
On 11/07/2012 07:05 AM, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>> the very liberal democrat party.
>
>
> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>
> Obama has a MANDATE.
Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote. Hardly a mandate, no matter what
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>> the very liberal democrat party.
>
>
> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>
> Obama has a MANDATE.
Dick Cheney may or may not have asserted in 2004.
Ron
Nov 7, 2012, 10:09:40 AM11/7/12
to
On Nov 7, 6:07 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
know....where they take your school taxes even though you don't have
children and then give it to people to educate their kids!
Socialism !!
(Dingbat)
Man of Mind
Nov 7, 2012, 10:13:55 AM11/7/12
to
On 11/7/2012 8:22 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 07:05 AM, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
>> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>> the very liberal democrat party.
>>
>>
>> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>>
>> Obama has a MANDATE.
>
> Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote
50.3, 59,700,029 voters at this count/time..
> On 11/07/2012 07:05 AM, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
>> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>> the very liberal democrat party.
>>
>>
>> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>>
>> Obama has a MANDATE.
>
> Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote
--Still having trouble with numbers, I see..
Kenny McCormack
Nov 7, 2012, 11:06:32 AM11/7/12
to
In article <k7dtqt$1hs$1...@dont-email.me>,
Republicans and math have never been on a first name basis with each other.
--
But the Bush apologists hope that you won't remember all that. And they
also have a theory, which I've been hearing more and more - namely,
that President Obama, though not yet in office or even elected, caused the
2008 slump. You see, people were worried in advance about his future
policies, and that's what caused the economy to tank. Seriously.
(Paul Krugman - Addicted to Bush)
--
But the Bush apologists hope that you won't remember all that. And they
also have a theory, which I've been hearing more and more - namely,
that President Obama, though not yet in office or even elected, caused the
2008 slump. You see, people were worried in advance about his future
policies, and that's what caused the economy to tank. Seriously.
(Paul Krugman - Addicted to Bush)
Lee L. Curtis
Nov 7, 2012, 11:33:07 AM11/7/12
to
Lee L. Curtis
Nov 7, 2012, 11:35:04 AM11/7/12
to
huge number of young voters, and voting Demo.
The future does not bode well for the GOP.
duke
Nov 7, 2012, 11:43:31 AM11/7/12
to
>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>the very liberal democrat party.
>Never in a 1000 years!!!
Where did that one come from? They play "hit below the belt". Now it's our
>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>the very liberal democrat party.
>Never in a 1000 years!!!
turn. 49% (57 million people) of the US said no to obama.
>We Conservatives must do all we can to stop the forward march of
>socialism and communism, as well as globalism.
>
>Never ever give in! Never comply! Never conform!
>
>Our values are the right values. Obama won by a slim margin. At least
>half of America agrees with us. Now we must teach those who do not
>know the difference between the radical left and Conservatism.
>
>NEVER GIVE IN NO MATTER WHAT THE LEFT SAYS!
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************
David Hartung
Nov 7, 2012, 11:45:40 AM11/7/12
to
Message has been deleted
duke
Nov 7, 2012, 11:51:36 AM11/7/12
to
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:05:15 -0500, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
<PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>the very liberal democrat party.
>
>
>According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>
>Obama has a MANDATE.
With 49% of the country against him, hell no.
<PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>the very liberal democrat party.
>
>
>According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>
>Obama has a MANDATE.
•R.Measures
Nov 7, 2012, 12:17:56 PM11/7/12
to
Lee L. Curtis
Nov 7, 2012, 12:47:49 PM11/7/12
to
Willard Twitt Romney, LOSER
Nov 7, 2012, 1:01:56 PM11/7/12
to
On 11/07/2012 11:06 AM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article<k7dtqt$1hs$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Man of Mind<baron.v...@gmail.invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 11/7/2012 8:22 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 11/07/2012 07:05 AM, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
>>>> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>>>> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>>>> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>>>> the very liberal democrat party.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>>>> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>>>>
>>>> Obama has a MANDATE.
>>>
>>> Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote
>>
>> 50.3, 59,700,029 voters at this count/time..
>>
>> --Still having trouble with numbers, I see..
>
> Republicans and math have never been on a first name basis with each other.
>
Too much like science.
> In article<k7dtqt$1hs$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Man of Mind<baron.v...@gmail.invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 11/7/2012 8:22 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 11/07/2012 07:05 AM, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
>>>> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>>>> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>>>> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>>>> the very liberal democrat party.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>>>> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>>>>
>>>> Obama has a MANDATE.
>>>
>>> Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote
>>
>> 50.3, 59,700,029 voters at this count/time..
>>
>> --Still having trouble with numbers, I see..
>
> Republicans and math have never been on a first name basis with each other.
>
David Hartung
Nov 7, 2012, 1:22:15 PM11/7/12
to
states.
Alan Ferris
Nov 7, 2012, 2:13:08 PM11/7/12
to
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 7, 2012, 2:21:49 PM11/7/12
to
I am only intolerant against intolerance (*) such as the one spread by
you and other "Christians" (whose actions are not liked by Jesus) on a
daily basis.
-Ramon
(*) This phenomenon has been studied.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
David Hartung
Nov 7, 2012, 2:37:09 PM11/7/12
to
Gary DW
Nov 7, 2012, 2:49:33 PM11/7/12
to
In article
<UYCdnRhzlsMR8wfN...@giganews.com>, David
Hartung says...
> >> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
> >> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
> >> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
> >> the very liberal democrat party.
> >
> >
> > According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
> > and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
> >
> > Obama has a MANDATE.
>
> Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote. Hardly a mandate, no matter what
> Dick Cheney may or may not have asserted in 2004.
>
>
>
Is that what you said back then?
Don't lie!
Jesus is watching...
--
"[The] debt explosion has resulted not from big spending
by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's
embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious
doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from
tax cuts."
-Reagan budget chief David Stockman
<UYCdnRhzlsMR8wfN...@giganews.com>, David
Hartung says...
> >> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
> >> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
> >> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
> >> the very liberal democrat party.
> >
> >
> > According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
> > and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
> >
> > Obama has a MANDATE.
>
> Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote. Hardly a mandate, no matter what
> Dick Cheney may or may not have asserted in 2004.
>
>
>
Don't lie!
Jesus is watching...
--
"[The] debt explosion has resulted not from big spending
by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's
embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious
doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from
tax cuts."
-Reagan budget chief David Stockman
Alan Ferris
Nov 7, 2012, 2:53:15 PM11/7/12
to
David Hartung
Nov 7, 2012, 2:58:34 PM11/7/12
to
David Hartung
Nov 7, 2012, 3:01:26 PM11/7/12
to
On 11/07/2012 01:49 PM, Gary DW wrote:
> In article
> <UYCdnRhzlsMR8wfN...@giganews.com>, David
> Hartung says...
>
>
>>>> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>>> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>>> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>>> the very liberal democrat party.
>>>
>>>
>>> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>>> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>>>
>>> Obama has a MANDATE.
>>
>> Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote. Hardly a mandate, no matter what
>> Dick Cheney may or may not have asserted in 2004.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Is that what you said back then?
As it has been 12 years since that election, I do not remember
> In article
> <UYCdnRhzlsMR8wfN...@giganews.com>, David
> Hartung says...
>
>
>>>> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>>> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>>> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>>> the very liberal democrat party.
>>>
>>>
>>> According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>>> and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>>>
>>> Obama has a MANDATE.
>>
>> Obama won 50.03% of the popular vote. Hardly a mandate, no matter what
>> Dick Cheney may or may not have asserted in 2004.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Is that what you said back then?
specifically what I said, but for me to have claimed a mandate would
have been out of character for me. If I did claim a mandate for Bush, I
was wrong.
Alan Ferris
Nov 8, 2012, 2:42:51 AM11/8/12
to
duke
Nov 8, 2012, 6:58:17 AM11/8/12
to
duke
Nov 8, 2012, 7:00:31 AM11/8/12
to
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:49:59 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>the very liberal democrat party.
>
>Looks like even a moron like you ought to figure out that
>On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>>the very liberal democrat party.
>
>conservatism/loonytarianism got shit on pretty good.
>Maybe you ought to try a winner for a change?
No, those are the people that are the democrat freeloaders.
Obama Phone
Nov 8, 2012, 7:52:38 AM11/8/12
to
He has a narrow victory. And now he has a president's 2nd term curse.
read today's NY Times. Obammy is in for a rough ride.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/triumphant-obama-faces-new-foe-in-second-term-curse.html
Christopher Helms
Nov 8, 2012, 9:21:57 AM11/8/12
to
On Nov 7, 6:07 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
> the very liberal democrat party.
>
> According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
> be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
> must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
> the very liberal democrat party.
>
> Never in a 1000 years!!!
>
>
> We Conservatives must do all we can to stop the forward march of
> socialism and communism, as well as globalism.
>
> Never ever give in! Never comply! Never conform!
>
> Our values are the right values. Obama won by a slim margin. At least
> half of America agrees with us. Now we must teach those who do not
> know the difference between the radical left and Conservatism.
>
> NEVER GIVE IN NO MATTER WHAT THE LEFT SAYS!
Conservatives don't have to become liberals, but they can't sit there
> socialism and communism, as well as globalism.
>
> Never ever give in! Never comply! Never conform!
>
> Our values are the right values. Obama won by a slim margin. At least
> half of America agrees with us. Now we must teach those who do not
> know the difference between the radical left and Conservatism.
>
> NEVER GIVE IN NO MATTER WHAT THE LEFT SAYS!
listening to the right wing media and stewing in their own paranoid
neuroses either, unless they like losing.
vit...@gmail.com
Nov 8, 2012, 9:38:07 AM11/8/12
to
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 5:30:02 AM UTC-8, Tracey12 wrote:
> On Nov 7, 7:05 am, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
>
>
>
> Even before Obamacare kicks in fully, Obama is running up a 1.2
>
> Trillion dollar increase in the debt each year. In four more, that
>
> will add 5 Trillion more to the 6 Trillion he's already racked up.
>
> And, we are not counting the costs of Obamacare or any other insanity
>
> he might pass.
>
>
>
> Therefore, in 4 years, our debt will be the current 16 Trillion plus
>
> an additional 5 Trillion at the very minimum.
>
>
>
> With 21 Trillion in debt, our GDP won't touch it since its only 14 to
>
> 15 Trillion per year. We will be fully bankrupt and since we are
>
> already using the Federal Reserve to print money for a large portion
>
> of the annual deficit, we may not find anyone who will loan us a
>
> dime. At that point, the USD crashes in value, and the Obama
>
> Depression will look like a nothing compared to the horrible economic
>
> disaster that we will face then.
>
>
>
> I beg someone to tell me how we avoid this event. Many are saying it
>
> is going to happen.
I love the way you assholes run up the debt and shift the blame to others. Your day is over pig.
> On Nov 7, 7:05 am, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
>
> <PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>
> > and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>
> >
>
> > Obama has a MANDATE.
>
>
>
> Obama has a headache,
> <PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > According to Dick Cheney, when GWBush squeaked out victories over Gore
>
> > and Kerry, Bush had a "mandate."
>
> >
>
> > Obama has a MANDATE.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Even before Obamacare kicks in fully, Obama is running up a 1.2
>
> Trillion dollar increase in the debt each year. In four more, that
>
> will add 5 Trillion more to the 6 Trillion he's already racked up.
>
> And, we are not counting the costs of Obamacare or any other insanity
>
> he might pass.
>
>
>
> Therefore, in 4 years, our debt will be the current 16 Trillion plus
>
> an additional 5 Trillion at the very minimum.
>
>
>
> With 21 Trillion in debt, our GDP won't touch it since its only 14 to
>
> 15 Trillion per year. We will be fully bankrupt and since we are
>
> already using the Federal Reserve to print money for a large portion
>
> of the annual deficit, we may not find anyone who will loan us a
>
> dime. At that point, the USD crashes in value, and the Obama
>
> Depression will look like a nothing compared to the horrible economic
>
> disaster that we will face then.
>
>
>
> I beg someone to tell me how we avoid this event. Many are saying it
>
> is going to happen.
I love the way you assholes run up the debt and shift the blame to others. Your day is over pig.
vit...@gmail.com
Nov 8, 2012, 9:40:10 AM11/8/12
to
M.I.Wakefield
Nov 8, 2012, 9:43:05 AM11/8/12
to
"Christopher Helms" wrote in message
news:c26770a1-4a53-46bc...@j10g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> Conservatives don't have to become liberals, but they can't sit there
> listening to the right wing media and stewing in their own paranoid
> neuroses either, unless they like losing.
And they have to admit that the words "trans-vaginal ultrasound" are
antithetical to the concept of small, limited, government that they claim to
espouse.
news:c26770a1-4a53-46bc...@j10g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> Conservatives don't have to become liberals, but they can't sit there
> listening to the right wing media and stewing in their own paranoid
> neuroses either, unless they like losing.
antithetical to the concept of small, limited, government that they claim to
espouse.
mr_antone
Nov 8, 2012, 9:52:55 AM11/8/12
to
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:07:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>the very liberal democrat party.
Malarkey.
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>According to democrats, because Obama won by a slim margin, there can
>be no opposition to Obama, thus the Republican and Independent parties
>must become much more liberal and comply and conform to the demands of
>the very liberal democrat party.
>
>Never in a 1000 years!!!
>
>We Conservatives must do all we can to stop the forward march of
>socialism and communism, as well as globalism.
>
>Never ever give in! Never comply! Never conform!
>
>Our values are the right values. Obama won by a slim margin. At least
>half of America agrees with us. Now we must teach those who do not
>know the difference between the radical left and Conservatism.
>
>NEVER GIVE IN NO MATTER WHAT THE LEFT SAYS!
hide under their beds.
Reagan and both Bushes - Responsible for the greatest increases in the
Federal government, regulations, debt and unfunded mandates.
Every single time.
mr_antone
--
Bert
Nov 8, 2012, 10:05:26 AM11/8/12
to
In news:i8hn98pujouc76iik...@4ax.com mr_antone
Democrats and Republicans.
[Newsgroups trimmed]
--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
<ju...@not.here> wrote:
> Reagan and both Bushes - Responsible for the greatest increases in the
> Federal government, regulations, debt and unfunded mandates.
Some people still think there are real differences between modern
> Reagan and both Bushes - Responsible for the greatest increases in the
> Federal government, regulations, debt and unfunded mandates.
Democrats and Republicans.
[Newsgroups trimmed]
--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
•R.Measures
Nov 8, 2012, 10:33:38 AM11/8/12
to
•R.Measures
Nov 8, 2012, 10:36:17 AM11/8/12
to
In article <i8hn98pujouc76iik...@4ax.com>, mr_antone
• But it doesn't matter to Neo-cons Mr. A. since they are virtually
immune to unfavorable reality.
immune to unfavorable reality.
mr_antone
Nov 8, 2012, 11:14:25 AM11/8/12
to
On 08 Nov 2012 15:05:26 GMT, Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>In news:i8hn98pujouc76iik...@4ax.com mr_antone
><ju...@not.here> wrote:
>
>> Reagan and both Bushes - Responsible for the greatest increases in the
>> Federal government, regulations, debt and unfunded mandates.
>
>Some people still think there are real differences between modern
>Democrats and Republicans.
Subject is about Conservatives.
>In news:i8hn98pujouc76iik...@4ax.com mr_antone
><ju...@not.here> wrote:
>
>> Reagan and both Bushes - Responsible for the greatest increases in the
>> Federal government, regulations, debt and unfunded mandates.
>
>Some people still think there are real differences between modern
>Democrats and Republicans.
mr_antone
--
Gary DW
Nov 8, 2012, 2:19:46 PM11/8/12
to
In article
<Ub2dnU8uC4KLIwfN...@giganews.com>, David
Hartung says...
Well, considering you have absolutely no self-
awareness... zero. Zilch NONE... I will take this with a
grain of salt.
There nothing about your character that doesn't suggesat
you thought Bush had a mandate.
If I did claim a mandate for Bush, I
> was wrong.
How convenient.
<Ub2dnU8uC4KLIwfN...@giganews.com>, David
Hartung says...
awareness... zero. Zilch NONE... I will take this with a
grain of salt.
There nothing about your character that doesn't suggesat
you thought Bush had a mandate.
If I did claim a mandate for Bush, I
> was wrong.
rin tin timkovych
Nov 10, 2012, 12:44:04 PM11/10/12
to
On 11/7/2012 8:13 AM, Man of Mind wrote:
>
> --Still having trouble with numbers, I see..
------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --Still having trouble with numbers, I see..
My condolensces, I'm just an out of work physicist.
Kurt Lochner - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Kurt.Loch...@f22.n14766.z1.FIDONET.ORG
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kurt.Loch...@f22.n14766.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Kurt Lochner)
Subject: Re: The Coverup
Date: 6 Aug 91 16:46:55 GMT
Quote:
Hi Kurt,
To add to some people's idea that the Greys look like
insects, I'm reminded of an article in the most recent
UFO Magazine in which a man describes an encounter
with beings that looked like insects to him.
----------
I 'll be happy to sent you a copy of this article if
you want it.
Hmm, I'm wondering how you'll send it to me, I presume
US Snail-mail so here's the address....
500 S. State #40
Edmond, OK 73034
I got ahold of a copy of Strieber's Majestic and find
most of it to be interesting. I still get the impression
that the Roswell debris was hijacked in mid-air and that
the government officialdom is still quite embarrassed.
--
Kurt Lochner - via FidoNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Kurt.Loch...@f22.n14766.z1.FIDONET.ORG
---------------------------------------------------------------
Message has been deleted
0 new messages