> On 11/08/2012 04:21 PM, Dacato wrote:
> > On Nov 8, 11:44 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/08/2012 10:58 AM, Lee L. Curtis wrote:

> >>> David Hartung wrote:

> >>>> I will believe it when I see it.

> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/b3ul75w
> >>>> [...]
> >>>> Conservative leaders on Wednesday lashed out at Mitt Romney, saying
> >>>> his attempts to paint himself as a centrist and hide his principles
> >>>> cost him the presidency.

> >>>> They vowed to wage a war to put the Tea Party in charge of the
> >>>> Republican Party by the time it nominates its next presidential
> >>>> candidate.

> >>>> The battle to take over the Republican Party begins today and the
> >>>> failed Republican leadership should resign, said Richard Viguerie, a
> >>>> top activist and chairman of ConservativeHQ.com.

> >>>> He said the lesson on Romney s loss to President Obama on Tuesday is
> >>>> that the GOP must never again nominate a a big government
> >>>> established conservative for president. [...]

> >>>       Aren't all conservatives "big government" when
> >>> it comes to enacting the regulations they want to
> >>> impose?

> >> That is the problem. True conservatives wish to reduce the government's
> >> interference in our lives. Any who believe the current Republican party
> >> to be conservative is simply wrong.- Hide quoted text -

> >> - Show quoted text -

> > How can you say that conservatives want to reduce the government's
> > interference in our lives and yet support a government who wants to
> > FORCE a woman to give birth to a baby conceived through rape? How is
> > that an example of reducing the government's interference in our
> > lives? Serious question. I would like to know how conservatives make
> > this justification.

> It is called life. We respect and honor it.