Received: by 10.180.88.195 with SMTP id bi3mr1353629wib.3.1343318550036;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.197.137 with SMTP id iu9mr1676516igc.1.1343318455257;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: ge7ni76382822wib.0!nntp.google.com!7no3646389wig.0!news-out.google.com!b9ni65295570pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-peer1!btnet!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!multikabel.net!newsfeed10.multikabel.net!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.stw-bonn.de!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jean <goterm...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.politics,alt.religion.christian,austin.general
Subject: Re: Democrats: Why Do You Want Only The Police To Have Guns?
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 14:53:25 -0500
Organization: OFA
Lines: 108
Message-ID: <gotermite-CD8D47.14532421072012@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <337ce614-5f57-4e09-9d7e-bbec23929d11@d24g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <52e512cc-8657-48bb-907e-1cb9b2081270@e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <jude11$g3c$1@dont-email.me> <f9819593-e80f-482d-913a-69b4cf02a890@y12g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <pluk085emb34aphmp68n9s5qsk8qusf9d8@4ax.com> <a09767ce-cbc2-451b-9ac4-55f7e6f16b43@p1g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0bc4d47c3dc9743ca7f1e871fe91d6f7";
	logging-data="27088"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19gYGTPtc8YkhrTT+AxBUpTWpoxTZl4f9s="
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5NAjOc2boNQlXa04EXOh1BwpD4M=
Bytes: 5783

In article 
<a09767ce-cbc2-451b-9ac4-55f7e6f16...@p1g2000yqd.googlegroup
s.com>,
 Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 21, 4:51�am, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:34:59 -0700 (PDT), Ron <roneal1...@att.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >On Jul 21, 12:17�am, "bill clinton" <hill...@cankles.com> wrote:
> > >> Ron wrote:
> > >> > On Jul 20, 5:24 pm, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> The socialist party, aka Democrats, are constantly using any misuse
> > >> >> of a gun to call for massive gun restrictions, or out right
> > >> >> confiscation of guns from the American public.
> >
> > >> >> The shooting in Colorado has caused a number of democrats to start
> > >> >> screaming about the need for new gun laws, but when the law abiding
> > >> >> public is disarmed, only those who don't care about following the
> > >> >> law
> > >> >> will be armed. Look at Chicago with some of the most restrictive gun
> > >> >> laws in America..that city is a war zone of thugs and low life
> > >> >> killing people daily. The gun laws only stop good citizens from
> > >> >> being able to defend themselves.
> >
> > >> >> Most importantly, our right to bear arms as upheld recently by the
> > >> >> USSC is not about hunting, target practice or even home defense. It
> > >> >> is about having a balance of power between We the People and our
> > >> >> government so that tyranny is unthinkable because the People will
> > >> >> rightly oppose it in a moment. That is why our founders placed the
> > >> >> 2nd Amendment in 2nd position: Its importance is that great just
> > >> >> under the vital First Amendment guaranteeing free speech and freedom
> > >> >> of religion.
> >
> > >> >> Foreigners like Wy and the ferrit can not understand these concepts.
> >
> > >> >> Why do democrats believe that only the police have a right to keep
> > >> >> and bear arms?
> >
> > >> > Tracey writes: That is why our founders placed the 2nd Amendment in
> > >> > 2nd position:
> >
> > >> > No....if you read it, and I think you won't read it with
> > >> > comprehension, it begins:
> >
> > >> > "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
> > >> > State..."
> >
> > >> and ends �"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
> > >> infringed."
> >
> > >> It says nothing to the effect that "those People" are the miltia
> >
> > >> > The US did not have a large standing army at its service. �An armed
> > >> > militia would provide military protection for the young republic.
> >
> > >> It says nothing to the effect, as you �quoted, " being necessary to the
> > >> security of a free State".
> > >> A Free State, not the security of �a free republic
> >
> > >> > The right to own arms was not provided to keep our government "in
> > >> > line", but rather to protect the republic.
> >
> > >> No, to protect the State and �Shall not be INFRINGED is pretty damn
> > >> clear to me.
> >
> > >You posted:
> >
> > >"It says nothing to the effect, as you �quoted, " being necessary to
> > >the security of a free State".
> >
> > >No? �read this at:
> >
> > >http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/bill/textpresentbill...
> >
> > >"A well regulated Militia, BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE
> > >STATE, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
> > >infringed."
> >
> > >You are deranged.
> >
> > Is English your second or third language? Did you know there were
> > States back in 1776? Do you know the USA is a Republic, not a State?
> > Did you know that to guarantee the security of a free State, an armed
> > citizenry would make it much harder for a dictator to assume power?
> > Did you know the militia consisted of the citizenry?
> >
> > No you didn't know any of that, therefore you are stupid, or you do
> > not understand English. Which is it?
> >
> > Mike Smith
> 
> Great points.  Liberals trust the state, not the citizenry, hence
> Ron's answers.

The mob lynches folk.

-- 
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1944435/posts  http://goo.gl/D4pSu
Columbine http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/books/review/Senior-t.html