Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
#Mittens rakes in bucks from panicked rightwingers in wake of HC decision
4 views
Skip to first unread message
3054 Dead
Jun 29, 2012, 10:48:45 AM6/29/12
to
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/29/mitt-romney-campaign-millions
Romney rakes in millions in wake of supreme court healthcare decision
Election of the Republican challenger to Obama now seen as the right's
only solution to abolishing Affordable Care Act
Ewen MacAskill in Washington
guardian.co.uk, Friday 29 June 2012 10.24 EDT
Mitt Romney's campaign has taken $4.3m in donations since the supreme
court's decision to uphold Barack Obama's healthcare reform.
The Republican nominee's team is citing the influx of cash as a sign that
the party base has been energised by the decision and that the issue will
play a central role in November's White House election.
Romney's spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, said the $4.3m had come from 43,000
individual donors.
Many right-wingers, in particular the Tea Party movement, have been
hesitant about support for Romney because he introduced similar healthcare
reforms when he was governor of Massachusetts. With the supreme court
option closed off, some may now see a Romney presidency as the only way
to block Obama's health reforms.
Romney and Congressional leaders such as John Boehner and Mitch McConnell
were careful to avoid expressions of disappointment in the wake of the
ruling. But one of Romney's early rivals for the Republican nomination,
Michele Bachmann, admitted outside the supreme court she was "profoundly
disappointed".
Republican Congressman Mike Pence, at a closed door session of House
Republicans, went much further, comparing the ruling to 9/11, a comment
for which he later apologised, saying he did not mean to minimise the
suffering of those who suffered from the terrorist attack.
It would have been so much easier for Congressional Republicans and
Romney if the supreme court had ruled against all or part of the law.
Obama would have been left vulnerable, sitting in the White House amid
the wreckage of his flagship legislation, trying to work out which bits
were salvageable.
Romney, campaigning in Virginia earlier this week, offered an advance of
the line of attack he would have been taking: that Obama had squandered
the first – and perhaps only – term of his presidency on a lost cause.
"If Obamacare is not deemed constitutional, then the first three-and-a-
half years of this president's term will have been wasted on something
that has not helped the American people," he said.
But this Plan A had to be scrapped when the supreme court issued its
ruling. Instead, Romney had to resort to Plan B, saying that he would do
what the court failed to do and move to scrap it on the first day of his
presidency.
Speaking in Washington, in front a podium decked with the slogan 'repeal
and replace Obamacare', Romney said: "Help us defeat Obamacare. Help us
defeat the liberal agenda that makes government too big, too intrusive,
and is killing jobs across this great country."
The Romney campaign team claimed the supreme court ruling had galvanised
the support of opponents of the law and that in the first three hours
after the ruling $1m in donations poured into the Romney headquarters.
The team will be hoping the supreme court move might rekindle the Tea
Party movement, diverting its energy behind his campaign.
Romney will fight the election on healthcare but nowhere near to the
extent to which he will on the economy, the issue which both he and Obama
acknowledge will determine the outcome.
The health issue is no longer as big a positive for Romney as it was for
the Republicans in the Congressional elections in 2010. Most voters have
made up their minds, so there do not seem to be new votes to be won over.
The crucial difference is that many of those opposed who profess to be
opposed to the act want to keep some of the measures.
There are practical problems too with repeal. Although Romney said he
would act to repeal Obama's Affordable Care Act from day one of his
presidency, that is near impossible. There is almost no chance of the
Republicans securing in November the 60 seats in the Senate they would
need to prevent the Democrats from filibustering any attempts to repeal
the legislation.
An alternative for Romney, and one he has described on the campaign
trail, would be to try to wreck Obama's healthcare reform – or at least
some of it. One way to do that would be to issue waivers to states
allowing them to opt out.
But wrecking the reform is not as easy as it would have been two years
ago. Romney and the Republicans would face a pushback if they tried to
reverse some of the more popular measures.
What is telling from Romney's statement on Thursday is recognition that
the outright hostility expressed two years ago is being replaced by this
more mixed response. Among measures that are popular are forcing
insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing conditions.
Instead of a complete denunciation of Obama's healthcare reform, as
Republicans would have done two years ago, Romney devoted a large section
of his statement to the parts he would keep. "What are some of the things
that we'll keep in place, and must be in place, in a reform, a real
reform, of our healthcare system?" He vowed to "make sure that those
people who have pre-existing conditions know that they will be able to be
insured and they will not lose their insurance".
The House Republicans, working in tandem with Romney, are to hold a vote
on July 11 to repeal the Affordable Care Act. But it a purely symbolic
gesture as the Democrats still control the Senate and even if they did
not, Obama would veto it anyway.
Romney has not had a good few weeks. He has been outmanouvered by Obama
on immigration reform. He has been forced on the defensive again over his
time with Bain Capital because of a damaging Washington Post story about
American jobs being sent overseas. His campaign team went to see the Post
staff on Wednesday to rebut it but the Post stood by its story. Figures
on Thursday also show an improvement in house prices, a hopeful economic
indicator for Obama. But it was the supreme court that delivered the
worst setback.
--
Subscribe:
zepps_essay...@yahoogroups.com
zepps_news...@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe:
zepps_essays...@yahoogroups.com
zepps_news-...@yahoogroups.com
Not dead, in jail or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Romney rakes in millions in wake of supreme court healthcare decision
Election of the Republican challenger to Obama now seen as the right's
only solution to abolishing Affordable Care Act
Ewen MacAskill in Washington
guardian.co.uk, Friday 29 June 2012 10.24 EDT
Mitt Romney's campaign has taken $4.3m in donations since the supreme
court's decision to uphold Barack Obama's healthcare reform.
The Republican nominee's team is citing the influx of cash as a sign that
the party base has been energised by the decision and that the issue will
play a central role in November's White House election.
Romney's spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, said the $4.3m had come from 43,000
individual donors.
Many right-wingers, in particular the Tea Party movement, have been
hesitant about support for Romney because he introduced similar healthcare
reforms when he was governor of Massachusetts. With the supreme court
option closed off, some may now see a Romney presidency as the only way
to block Obama's health reforms.
Romney and Congressional leaders such as John Boehner and Mitch McConnell
were careful to avoid expressions of disappointment in the wake of the
ruling. But one of Romney's early rivals for the Republican nomination,
Michele Bachmann, admitted outside the supreme court she was "profoundly
disappointed".
Republican Congressman Mike Pence, at a closed door session of House
Republicans, went much further, comparing the ruling to 9/11, a comment
for which he later apologised, saying he did not mean to minimise the
suffering of those who suffered from the terrorist attack.
It would have been so much easier for Congressional Republicans and
Romney if the supreme court had ruled against all or part of the law.
Obama would have been left vulnerable, sitting in the White House amid
the wreckage of his flagship legislation, trying to work out which bits
were salvageable.
Romney, campaigning in Virginia earlier this week, offered an advance of
the line of attack he would have been taking: that Obama had squandered
the first – and perhaps only – term of his presidency on a lost cause.
"If Obamacare is not deemed constitutional, then the first three-and-a-
half years of this president's term will have been wasted on something
that has not helped the American people," he said.
But this Plan A had to be scrapped when the supreme court issued its
ruling. Instead, Romney had to resort to Plan B, saying that he would do
what the court failed to do and move to scrap it on the first day of his
presidency.
Speaking in Washington, in front a podium decked with the slogan 'repeal
and replace Obamacare', Romney said: "Help us defeat Obamacare. Help us
defeat the liberal agenda that makes government too big, too intrusive,
and is killing jobs across this great country."
The Romney campaign team claimed the supreme court ruling had galvanised
the support of opponents of the law and that in the first three hours
after the ruling $1m in donations poured into the Romney headquarters.
The team will be hoping the supreme court move might rekindle the Tea
Party movement, diverting its energy behind his campaign.
Romney will fight the election on healthcare but nowhere near to the
extent to which he will on the economy, the issue which both he and Obama
acknowledge will determine the outcome.
The health issue is no longer as big a positive for Romney as it was for
the Republicans in the Congressional elections in 2010. Most voters have
made up their minds, so there do not seem to be new votes to be won over.
The crucial difference is that many of those opposed who profess to be
opposed to the act want to keep some of the measures.
There are practical problems too with repeal. Although Romney said he
would act to repeal Obama's Affordable Care Act from day one of his
presidency, that is near impossible. There is almost no chance of the
Republicans securing in November the 60 seats in the Senate they would
need to prevent the Democrats from filibustering any attempts to repeal
the legislation.
An alternative for Romney, and one he has described on the campaign
trail, would be to try to wreck Obama's healthcare reform – or at least
some of it. One way to do that would be to issue waivers to states
allowing them to opt out.
But wrecking the reform is not as easy as it would have been two years
ago. Romney and the Republicans would face a pushback if they tried to
reverse some of the more popular measures.
What is telling from Romney's statement on Thursday is recognition that
the outright hostility expressed two years ago is being replaced by this
more mixed response. Among measures that are popular are forcing
insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing conditions.
Instead of a complete denunciation of Obama's healthcare reform, as
Republicans would have done two years ago, Romney devoted a large section
of his statement to the parts he would keep. "What are some of the things
that we'll keep in place, and must be in place, in a reform, a real
reform, of our healthcare system?" He vowed to "make sure that those
people who have pre-existing conditions know that they will be able to be
insured and they will not lose their insurance".
The House Republicans, working in tandem with Romney, are to hold a vote
on July 11 to repeal the Affordable Care Act. But it a purely symbolic
gesture as the Democrats still control the Senate and even if they did
not, Obama would veto it anyway.
Romney has not had a good few weeks. He has been outmanouvered by Obama
on immigration reform. He has been forced on the defensive again over his
time with Bain Capital because of a damaging Washington Post story about
American jobs being sent overseas. His campaign team went to see the Post
staff on Wednesday to rebut it but the Post stood by its story. Figures
on Thursday also show an improvement in house prices, a hopeful economic
indicator for Obama. But it was the supreme court that delivered the
worst setback.
--
Subscribe:
zepps_essay...@yahoogroups.com
zepps_news...@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe:
zepps_essays...@yahoogroups.com
zepps_news-...@yahoogroups.com
Not dead, in jail or a slave? Thank a liberal!
David Hartung
Jun 29, 2012, 10:07:18 PM6/29/12
to
On 06/29/2012 09:48 AM, 3054 Dead wrote:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/29/mitt-romney-campaign-millions
>
>
> Romney rakes in millions in wake of supreme court healthcare decision
While Obama goes overseas for campaign donations:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/29/mitt-romney-campaign-millions
>
>
> Romney rakes in millions in wake of supreme court healthcare decision
http://tinyurl.com/7s4v36f
3054 Dead
Jun 30, 2012, 12:07:27 AM6/30/12
to
can spend as much money as he wants in American elections now, right?
All he has to do is incorporate here, and form a SuperPAC.
David Hartung
Jun 30, 2012, 6:40:14 AM6/30/12
to
coals for things on which you give Democrats a pass.
Kurt Nicklas
Jun 30, 2012, 8:00:32 AM6/30/12
to
mind - at his age it's the only
one he finds inhabitable.
Message has been deleted
3054 Dead
Jun 30, 2012, 11:32:28 AM6/30/12
to
3054 Dead
Jun 30, 2012, 11:33:52 AM6/30/12
to
Kurt Nicklas
Jun 30, 2012, 11:35:25 AM6/30/12
to
On Jun 30, 10:48 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:00:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> She okay with you getting drunk and making crank calls?
>
> From your Elon, NC home?
Gonna be publishing more personal info about me, Gary?
You remember what happened the last time you did it, right?
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:00:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I am more interested in the fact that you rake Republicans over the
> >> coals for things on which you give Democrats a pass.
>
> >He's living in a dream world, David. Has been for years. But keep in
> >mind - at his age it's the only
> >one he finds inhabitable.
>
> And what about your moscow "subway bride"?
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I am more interested in the fact that you rake Republicans over the
> >> coals for things on which you give Democrats a pass.
>
> >He's living in a dream world, David. Has been for years. But keep in
> >mind - at his age it's the only
> >one he finds inhabitable.
>
>
> She okay with you getting drunk and making crank calls?
>
> From your Elon, NC home?
Gonna be publishing more personal info about me, Gary?
You remember what happened the last time you did it, right?
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 1, 2012, 10:51:05 PM7/1/12
to
On Jun 30, 1:56 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> You keep referring to "something that happened"
Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
address, Gary.
Pretty funny.......you accuse *me of stalking and yet it's YOU who
gets punished for
doing that very thing.
Want to try it again?
I DARE you to do it again.
Or are you afraid of what might "happen"?
<snickers>
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jun 30, 10:48 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:00:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> I am more interested in the fact that you rake Republicans over the
> >> >> coals for things on which you give Democrats a pass.
>
> >> >He's living in a dream world, David. Has been for years. But keep in
> >> >mind - at his age it's the only
> >> >one he finds inhabitable.
>
> >> And what about your moscow "subway bride"?
>
> >> She okay with you getting drunk and making crank calls?
>
> >> From your Elon, NC home?
>
> >Gonna be publishing more personal info about me, Gary?
>
> >You remember what happened the last time you did it, right?
>
> "Happen"??
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jun 30, 10:48 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:00:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> I am more interested in the fact that you rake Republicans over the
> >> >> coals for things on which you give Democrats a pass.
>
> >> >He's living in a dream world, David. Has been for years. But keep in
> >> >mind - at his age it's the only
> >> >one he finds inhabitable.
>
> >> And what about your moscow "subway bride"?
>
> >> She okay with you getting drunk and making crank calls?
>
> >> From your Elon, NC home?
>
> >Gonna be publishing more personal info about me, Gary?
>
> >You remember what happened the last time you did it, right?
>
>
> You keep referring to "something that happened"
Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
address, Gary.
Pretty funny.......you accuse *me of stalking and yet it's YOU who
gets punished for
doing that very thing.
Want to try it again?
I DARE you to do it again.
Or are you afraid of what might "happen"?
<snickers>
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 2, 2012, 7:18:08 AM7/2/12
to
On Jul 2, 12:42 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:51:05 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Yes, you were, Gary.
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:51:05 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >address, Gary.
>
> I was?
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >address, Gary.
>
Yes, you were, Gary.
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 2, 2012, 11:36:07 AM7/2/12
to
On Jul 2, 9:11 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
You tell us.
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 2, 12:42 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:51:05 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >> >address, Gary.
>
> >> I was?
>
> >Yes, you were, Gary.
>
> By who?
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 2, 12:42 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:51:05 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >> >address, Gary.
>
> >> I was?
>
> >Yes, you were, Gary.
>
You tell us.
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 2, 2012, 8:25:15 PM7/2/12
to
On Jul 2, 1:58 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:36:07 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
...it's right on target and pisses you off terribly.
So tell us again, Gary: Why in the world did you post my home address
on Usenet?
Why did you think you could do it and not get your snout slapped like
you did?
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:36:07 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 2, 9:11 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Jul 2, 12:42 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:51:05 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >> >> >address, Gary.
>
> >> >> I was?
>
> >> >Yes, you were, Gary.
>
> >> By who?
>
> >You tell us.
>
> Like most of your silly shit,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 2, 9:11 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Jul 2, 12:42 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:51:05 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >> >> >address, Gary.
>
> >> >> I was?
>
> >> >Yes, you were, Gary.
>
> >> By who?
>
> >You tell us.
>
...it's right on target and pisses you off terribly.
So tell us again, Gary: Why in the world did you post my home address
on Usenet?
Why did you think you could do it and not get your snout slapped like
you did?
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 3, 2012, 7:29:46 AM7/3/12
to
On Jul 2, 10:32 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:25:15 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Exactly. You're so embarrassed by your stupidity (and so are your
friends) that
you can't bring yourself to admit who called you on posting my home
address.
See how easy it is to demonstrate your stupidity, Gary?
Heck, you can't even write in English, can you?
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:25:15 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >> >> >> >address, Gary.
>
> >> >> >> I was?
>
> >> >> >Yes, you were, Gary.
>
> >> >> By who?
>
> Crickets.....
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >> >> >> >address, Gary.
>
> >> >> >> I was?
>
> >> >> >Yes, you were, Gary.
>
> >> >> By who?
>
Exactly. You're so embarrassed by your stupidity (and so are your
friends) that
you can't bring yourself to admit who called you on posting my home
address.
See how easy it is to demonstrate your stupidity, Gary?
Heck, you can't even write in English, can you?
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 4, 2012, 8:10:22 AM7/4/12
to
On Jul 3, 9:28 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 04:29:46 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Are you sure? But you do admit that you did get snout-slapped for
something
you admit you did. I think we're making progress!
> Which brings up the BIG question---how would I have known?
Gary, I doubt you know anything whatever at this point. Even those in
the yahoo
newsgroup probably still laugh at you from time to time.
> You made a crank, hang up phone call from your home phone---you name
> came up on caller ID
Prove it. Assertions are not proof.
And assertions of proof also are not proof.
You have nothing, Gary. Nothing.
> The ONLY thing I knew was it came from a prefix in North Carolina.
See above.
> With YOUR NAME
Ooooooo! My very own name?!
> If I did what you claim I did---why didn't I publish the fucking PHONE
> NUMBER?
Simple. Because you didn't have it because I never made a phone call
and you never
saw it.
Easy to understand even for a dunce like you.
> You're still just an effeminante moron, Knickkkers
'effeminante'? Hahaha. You learn to spell that way at ole LHS, Gare
Bear?
> Which is what Volt and everyone said of you years ago.
What ever happened to Kennemur anyway?
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 04:29:46 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 2, 10:32 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:25:15 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >> >> >> >> >address, Gary.
>
> >> >> >> >> I was?
>
> >> >> >> >Yes, you were, Gary.
>
> >> >> >> By who?
>
> >> Crickets.....
>
> >Exactly. You're so embarrassed by your stupidity (and so are your
> >friends) that
> >you can't bring yourself to admit who called you on posting my home
> >address
>
> And you can't tell us who did.
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 2, 10:32 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:25:15 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >Yep, that "something" was when you got told to stop posting my
> >> >> >> >> >address, Gary.
>
> >> >> >> >> I was?
>
> >> >> >> >Yes, you were, Gary.
>
> >> >> >> By who?
>
> >> Crickets.....
>
> >Exactly. You're so embarrassed by your stupidity (and so are your
> >friends) that
> >you can't bring yourself to admit who called you on posting my home
> >address
>
Are you sure? But you do admit that you did get snout-slapped for
something
you admit you did. I think we're making progress!
> Which brings up the BIG question---how would I have known?
Gary, I doubt you know anything whatever at this point. Even those in
the yahoo
newsgroup probably still laugh at you from time to time.
> You made a crank, hang up phone call from your home phone---you name
> came up on caller ID
Prove it. Assertions are not proof.
And assertions of proof also are not proof.
You have nothing, Gary. Nothing.
> The ONLY thing I knew was it came from a prefix in North Carolina.
See above.
> With YOUR NAME
Ooooooo! My very own name?!
> If I did what you claim I did---why didn't I publish the fucking PHONE
> NUMBER?
Simple. Because you didn't have it because I never made a phone call
and you never
saw it.
Easy to understand even for a dunce like you.
> You're still just an effeminante moron, Knickkkers
'effeminante'? Hahaha. You learn to spell that way at ole LHS, Gare
Bear?
> Which is what Volt and everyone said of you years ago.
What ever happened to Kennemur anyway?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 4, 2012, 10:01:20 AM7/4/12
to
On Jul 4, 9:28 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 05:10:22 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
And what does that prove other than my claim you published my home
address?
As I said, you silly person, you didn't publish my phone number
because you never had it.
And you never had it because I never called you.
Being the stalker that you are, I'm sure you would have posted it if
you'd seen it.
You're just that sort.
Remember, Gary, that assertion is not proof. Doesn't matter how often
you repeat it.
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 05:10:22 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> If I did what you claim I did---why didn't I publish the fucking PHONE
> >> NUMBER?
>
> >Simple. Because you didn't have it because I never made a phone call
> >and you never
> >saw it.
>
> http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3155&id=482792...
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> If I did what you claim I did---why didn't I publish the fucking PHONE
> >> NUMBER?
>
> >Simple. Because you didn't have it because I never made a phone call
> >and you never
> >saw it.
>
And what does that prove other than my claim you published my home
address?
As I said, you silly person, you didn't publish my phone number
because you never had it.
And you never had it because I never called you.
Being the stalker that you are, I'm sure you would have posted it if
you'd seen it.
You're just that sort.
Remember, Gary, that assertion is not proof. Doesn't matter how often
you repeat it.
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 4, 2012, 4:51:47 PM7/4/12
to
On Jul 4, 1:35 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
The url above proves you didn't.
> (which is exactly what happened)
LOL. You found it somewhere and copied it.
If it was in your post then you posted it, Gary.
That's simple enough even for YOU to understand.
Then you got snout-slapped for posting it.
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3155&id=482792...
>
> >And what does that prove other than my claim you published my home
> >address?
>
> Prove I didn't get it included from a post and just "replied" to it?
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3155&id=482792...
>
> >And what does that prove other than my claim you published my home
> >address?
>
The url above proves you didn't.
> (which is exactly what happened)
LOL. You found it somewhere and copied it.
If it was in your post then you posted it, Gary.
That's simple enough even for YOU to understand.
Then you got snout-slapped for posting it.
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 4, 2012, 7:30:25 PM7/4/12
to
On Jul 4, 6:26 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:51:47 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
What does it matter, Gary? You got it. You posted it. You got spanked
for it.
Why are you soooo stupid?
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:51:47 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 4, 1:35 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3155&id=482792...
>
> >> >And what does that prove other than my claim you published my home
> >> >address?
>
> >> Prove I didn't get it included from a post and just "replied" to it?
>
> >The url above proves you didn't.
>
> You didn't explain how I could get your hovel's address
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 4, 1:35 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3155&id=482792...
>
> >> >And what does that prove other than my claim you published my home
> >> >address?
>
> >> Prove I didn't get it included from a post and just "replied" to it?
>
> >The url above proves you didn't.
>
What does it matter, Gary? You got it. You posted it. You got spanked
for it.
Why are you soooo stupid?
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 5, 2012, 7:17:29 AM7/5/12
to
On Jul 4, 11:14 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 16:30:25 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> tail-tucked, the laughter at you must have been psychologically
> damaging.
>
> It was enough to cause you to make drunken crank calls, hanging up
> because you were too chickeshit to speak
>
> And the mental stress from Volt, Zepp and (just about everyone) making
> fun of your effeminiate crying because we were making fun of
> you.....precious.
>
> Now you're attempting to "rehabilitate" your miserable existence by
> claiming "none of it happened"
>
> The scores of "whiney complaints" to ISP's you wrote against Zepp,
> Volt and me were what made people laugh at you.
>
> "Make them stop making fun of me", was what iDT told me you had
> written. Said it was Against "standard internet decency", you had
> claimed.
>
> When you left----we laughed for weeks.
>
> When you came back here---I thought it was a joke---(you are)
>
> I'd bet your Moscow "Subway bride" Ditched your girlie ass and took up
> with a real man.
>
> Didn't she?
Same old lies in exactly the same order, Gary. Don't you really have
any new
material?
Gonna tell us all who it was that threatened you after you posted my
home address?
Who made you stop, Gary?
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 16:30:25 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 4, 6:26 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:51:47 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Jul 4, 1:35 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3155&id=482792...
>
> >> >> >And what does that prove other than my claim you published my home
> >> >> >address?
>
> >> >> Prove I didn't get it included from a post and just "replied" to it?
>
> >> >The url above proves you didn't.
>
> >> You didn't explain how I could get your hovel's address
>
> >What does it matter, Gary? You got it. You posted it. You got spanked
> >for it.
>
> Considering I knocked you out of here for years, ashamed and
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 4, 6:26 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:51:47 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Jul 4, 1:35 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3155&id=482792...
>
> >> >> >And what does that prove other than my claim you published my home
> >> >> >address?
>
> >> >> Prove I didn't get it included from a post and just "replied" to it?
>
> >> >The url above proves you didn't.
>
> >> You didn't explain how I could get your hovel's address
>
> >What does it matter, Gary? You got it. You posted it. You got spanked
> >for it.
>
> tail-tucked, the laughter at you must have been psychologically
> damaging.
>
> It was enough to cause you to make drunken crank calls, hanging up
> because you were too chickeshit to speak
>
> And the mental stress from Volt, Zepp and (just about everyone) making
> fun of your effeminiate crying because we were making fun of
> you.....precious.
>
> Now you're attempting to "rehabilitate" your miserable existence by
> claiming "none of it happened"
>
> The scores of "whiney complaints" to ISP's you wrote against Zepp,
> Volt and me were what made people laugh at you.
>
> "Make them stop making fun of me", was what iDT told me you had
> written. Said it was Against "standard internet decency", you had
> claimed.
>
> When you left----we laughed for weeks.
>
> When you came back here---I thought it was a joke---(you are)
>
> I'd bet your Moscow "Subway bride" Ditched your girlie ass and took up
> with a real man.
>
> Didn't she?
Same old lies in exactly the same order, Gary. Don't you really have
any new
material?
Gonna tell us all who it was that threatened you after you posted my
home address?
Who made you stop, Gary?
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 5, 2012, 5:13:56 PM7/5/12
to
On Jul 5, 10:49 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:17:29 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> Like a recovering alcoholic----the minute you took another drink of
> your silly kool-aid of the 90's you started as loopy as you left off.
LOL
Thanks for demonstrating your ability to conjure up a babbling word
salad in an
attempt to put over the same lies you've been peddling for 1/7th of
your life.
Just what is it you're trying to say here?
> You cannot deny what you filed grievances to everyone's ISP's
> over---just because a decade has gone by.
I "cannot deny what you filed"? Are you repeating again this
accusation that
I've been harrassing "everyone's ISP" with complaints? That's simply a
lie and
you have no proof I've done any such thing.
But I will admit to complaining to your ISP on one occasion when you
called for the
death of a US Congresswoman because you didn't like her politics.
That got you thrown off the ISP and you've never forgiven me for it.
But I think you learned your lesson for some years, didn't you?
Well, on the other hand, now you edit the headers of your Usenet
postings so that
your posts disappear in a week:"X-No-Archive: yes". I guess you just
want to make sure that your next
stunt vanishes before you can be held to account for it, right?
> EVERYONE who knew your character in the 90's KNOWS you did exactly
> what I said.
Everyone with a brain in their heads knows that you've never presented
one nugget of
proof for your accusations in all the years you've been repeating
them.
> By this denial from you---we KNOW you're not only a wingnut, by a
> lying sack of shit as well
Roselle, the more you lie the more incoherent you become.
The bottom line is, as I've said before, you have no proof to back up
your silly accusations.
You, on the other hand, DID call for the death of a US Congresswoman
and you DID publish my
home address in a public forum. Both of those actions got you slapped.
Case closed.
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:17:29 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> your silly kool-aid of the 90's you started as loopy as you left off.
LOL
Thanks for demonstrating your ability to conjure up a babbling word
salad in an
attempt to put over the same lies you've been peddling for 1/7th of
your life.
Just what is it you're trying to say here?
> You cannot deny what you filed grievances to everyone's ISP's
> over---just because a decade has gone by.
I "cannot deny what you filed"? Are you repeating again this
accusation that
I've been harrassing "everyone's ISP" with complaints? That's simply a
lie and
you have no proof I've done any such thing.
But I will admit to complaining to your ISP on one occasion when you
called for the
death of a US Congresswoman because you didn't like her politics.
That got you thrown off the ISP and you've never forgiven me for it.
But I think you learned your lesson for some years, didn't you?
Well, on the other hand, now you edit the headers of your Usenet
postings so that
your posts disappear in a week:"X-No-Archive: yes". I guess you just
want to make sure that your next
stunt vanishes before you can be held to account for it, right?
> EVERYONE who knew your character in the 90's KNOWS you did exactly
> what I said.
Everyone with a brain in their heads knows that you've never presented
one nugget of
proof for your accusations in all the years you've been repeating
them.
> By this denial from you---we KNOW you're not only a wingnut, by a
> lying sack of shit as well
Roselle, the more you lie the more incoherent you become.
The bottom line is, as I've said before, you have no proof to back up
your silly accusations.
You, on the other hand, DID call for the death of a US Congresswoman
and you DID publish my
home address in a public forum. Both of those actions got you slapped.
Case closed.
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 6, 2012, 7:16:02 AM7/6/12
to
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 7, 2012, 5:30:04 AM7/7/12
to
On Jul 6, 10:54 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 04:16:02 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Careful, Gary. Your heart....
> IDT, (the first to offer Internet for reasonable fee)----stopped
> providng in most areas.
What does that have to do with anything at all? You're babbling again.
> Your silly complaints were laughed at----the techrep told me so.
Prove it. Prove anything like that happened.
Assertions aren't proof, Gary.
> But the record of you leaving here in shame, crying your effeminate
> eyes out is the record everyone knows.
"Leaving here"? Never happened.
> I didn't leave here, Knickkers----you did.
I didn't leave here but you, on the other hand, decided to try to hide
your
posts with xna. After getting pinned multiple times and humiliated by
things
like your love posts to John Hinkley you clumsily decided to try to
hide
all of that.
> As for your drunken, late-night, crank hang-up phone calls----that was
> really a blow when I posted the town you came from---ELON, NC.
The 'blow' fell when you got slapped and told to stop publishing my
home address.
Which you promptly did, like a good little peasant.
> I can still hear you spluttering and wondering how you forgot that
> Caller-ID would nail your dumb ass.
Doesn't it get kinda old running out those same old lies over and
over, Gary.
Do you suppose anyone listens anymore?
Remember: Assertions are not proof, Tin Can Sailor.
<snickers>
----------------------------
Re: Annual update on Weasel group
Posted by: "rose...@enetis.net" rose...@enetis.net
Date: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:30 pm ((PDT))
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>What other essential actions must we not mention on this list?
> It's important to cover them all. We would not want to miss the best
of the worst for inattention.
The point is that "someone" is feeding the bad guys
with information they in turn use against all of us.
Those they feed are not interested in discourse, or
argument ---or any of the things this group originally
represented---but merely to sabotege.
Years ago this group was able to talk about personal
things of interest.
Now it's merely a conduit of pissing and moaning and
those that are disagreed with are punished by using
outsiders.
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 04:16:02 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >That got you thrown off the ISP and you've never forgiven me for it.
>
> >But I think you learned your lesson for some years, didn't you?
>
> BWHAHAHA
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >That got you thrown off the ISP and you've never forgiven me for it.
>
> >But I think you learned your lesson for some years, didn't you?
>
Careful, Gary. Your heart....
> IDT, (the first to offer Internet for reasonable fee)----stopped
> providng in most areas.
What does that have to do with anything at all? You're babbling again.
> Your silly complaints were laughed at----the techrep told me so.
Prove it. Prove anything like that happened.
Assertions aren't proof, Gary.
> But the record of you leaving here in shame, crying your effeminate
> eyes out is the record everyone knows.
"Leaving here"? Never happened.
> I didn't leave here, Knickkers----you did.
I didn't leave here but you, on the other hand, decided to try to hide
your
posts with xna. After getting pinned multiple times and humiliated by
things
like your love posts to John Hinkley you clumsily decided to try to
hide
all of that.
> As for your drunken, late-night, crank hang-up phone calls----that was
> really a blow when I posted the town you came from---ELON, NC.
The 'blow' fell when you got slapped and told to stop publishing my
home address.
Which you promptly did, like a good little peasant.
> I can still hear you spluttering and wondering how you forgot that
> Caller-ID would nail your dumb ass.
Doesn't it get kinda old running out those same old lies over and
over, Gary.
Do you suppose anyone listens anymore?
Remember: Assertions are not proof, Tin Can Sailor.
<snickers>
----------------------------
Re: Annual update on Weasel group
Posted by: "rose...@enetis.net" rose...@enetis.net
Date: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:30 pm ((PDT))
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>What other essential actions must we not mention on this list?
> It's important to cover them all. We would not want to miss the best
of the worst for inattention.
The point is that "someone" is feeding the bad guys
with information they in turn use against all of us.
Those they feed are not interested in discourse, or
argument ---or any of the things this group originally
represented---but merely to sabotege.
Years ago this group was able to talk about personal
things of interest.
Now it's merely a conduit of pissing and moaning and
those that are disagreed with are punished by using
outsiders.
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 7, 2012, 12:22:39 PM7/7/12
to
On Jul 7, 11:35 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 02:30:04 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> dial-up access the year that internet was being offered. Only 3
> national providers controlled internet services (the Model-T version
> of the first internet) at high prices per "minute" (Compuserve, etc)
>
> Later when the Internet was promoted and well established (Thanks to
> Al Gore), there were thousands of providers.
>
> IDT got out of the business of internet providing, leaving their
> customers to the idiot rightwing religious fanatic who held the
> accounts.
>
> When the 2nd Provider started, I switched.
So you're claiming that at EXACTLY the same time you called for the
death of a US Congresswoman you - how conveniently - "switched"
ISPs?
ROFLOL
No one in Usenet is quite so credulous, Gary. You're pathetic.
Your repeated hatespeech makes it easy to doubt you.
Admit it: You "switched" because you got booted from one to another.
> So---you still don't like to admit your alcohol addled brain forgot
> about Caller ID, and Zepp, Volt ridiculed you so much that your tail
> almost broke ducking out of here?
Fantasies, Gary. Repeating them doesn't make them true or believable.
Want to keep repeating them? Please do but you'll never convince
anyone.
> Is that why you HAD to go to Russia and scour the Subway to find
> someone gullible enough to talk to you?
Why would you say such a silly, unprovable lie, Gary?
I want you to explain yourself so that you will, as always, simply dig
yourself
in deeper.
Can you do that?
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 02:30:04 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> IDT, (the first to offer Internet for reasonable fee)----stopped
> >> providng in most areas.
>
> >What does that have to do with anything at all? You're babbling again.
>
> IDT bought time from a businessman here to offer reasonably monthly
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> IDT, (the first to offer Internet for reasonable fee)----stopped
> >> providng in most areas.
>
> >What does that have to do with anything at all? You're babbling again.
>
> dial-up access the year that internet was being offered. Only 3
> national providers controlled internet services (the Model-T version
> of the first internet) at high prices per "minute" (Compuserve, etc)
>
> Later when the Internet was promoted and well established (Thanks to
> Al Gore), there were thousands of providers.
>
> IDT got out of the business of internet providing, leaving their
> customers to the idiot rightwing religious fanatic who held the
> accounts.
>
> When the 2nd Provider started, I switched.
So you're claiming that at EXACTLY the same time you called for the
death of a US Congresswoman you - how conveniently - "switched"
ISPs?
ROFLOL
No one in Usenet is quite so credulous, Gary. You're pathetic.
Your repeated hatespeech makes it easy to doubt you.
Admit it: You "switched" because you got booted from one to another.
> So---you still don't like to admit your alcohol addled brain forgot
> about Caller ID, and Zepp, Volt ridiculed you so much that your tail
> almost broke ducking out of here?
Fantasies, Gary. Repeating them doesn't make them true or believable.
Want to keep repeating them? Please do but you'll never convince
anyone.
> Is that why you HAD to go to Russia and scour the Subway to find
> someone gullible enough to talk to you?
Why would you say such a silly, unprovable lie, Gary?
I want you to explain yourself so that you will, as always, simply dig
yourself
in deeper.
Can you do that?
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 7, 2012, 4:53:31 PM7/7/12
to
On Jul 7, 4:07 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:22:39 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> your ass over what a dumb bastard you were for getting drunk and
> forgetting about Caller ID
Really? When was that, Gary? Can you be specific? Can you provide
proof that you ever did any of that? Remember, all your posts have
disappeared
from the archive because you're a coward.
Except, of course, for the posts that I saved.
> Better yet, Knickkkers
Yes, I know...it' gets better. <snickers>
> Call the FBI office here and see if the visit I had with 2 agents were
> logged----including your telephone number and the Snail Mail Beck had
> sent me. (carried in a sealed plastic bag for effect because it was
> during the anthrax scare---and BOTH of you seem to fit the psychotic,
> babbling, threatening, "outraged" idiots that would do something
> criminal)
So YOU claim you "visited the FBI" but I'm supposed to call them
for proof.
Why don't you surprise me? YOU provide proof any of this ever
happened.
Remember what I told you: Assertions aren't facts and assertions of
proof
aren't proof.
> "Really sick guys", they said. No mention of the "Katherine Harris"
> accusations included in the e-mails I had printed out---only about
> what a doofus you (and Beck) were to be acting like gradeschoolers.
So you ADMIT you threatened Katherine Harris and got your ass pitched
off
your former ISP just about the time a new ISP opened up.
How convenient for you, huh?
LOL
After that you got pwned by RCMAN a time or two. Remember the
"informer" that
made a fool out of you for nearly a month?
Then you published my home address for some stupid reason and got
slapped
yet AGAIN.
> "But, keep a record and if it continues, We'll turn it over to the
> attorney", they said.
>
> Too bad I didn't know about you hauling some slut back for Russia,
> they might have thought that was interesting enough to knock on your
> door.
You're like a broken record, Gary. Can't you at least embellish this
fantasy
a bit? Add more "details"? Ever been to Russia? Ever been even in a
subway?
Ever been in a town where the streets weren't paved with dirt? Ha!
See what you can do, 'k?
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:22:39 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> When the 2nd Provider started, I switched.
>
> >So you're claiming that at EXACTLY the same time you called for the
> >death of a US Congresswoman you - how conveniently - "switched"
> >ISPs?
>
> Sorry, but it was about the time I was laughing, ridiculing, kicking
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> When the 2nd Provider started, I switched.
>
> >So you're claiming that at EXACTLY the same time you called for the
> >death of a US Congresswoman you - how conveniently - "switched"
> >ISPs?
>
> your ass over what a dumb bastard you were for getting drunk and
> forgetting about Caller ID
Really? When was that, Gary? Can you be specific? Can you provide
proof that you ever did any of that? Remember, all your posts have
disappeared
from the archive because you're a coward.
Except, of course, for the posts that I saved.
> Better yet, Knickkkers
Yes, I know...it' gets better. <snickers>
> Call the FBI office here and see if the visit I had with 2 agents were
> logged----including your telephone number and the Snail Mail Beck had
> sent me. (carried in a sealed plastic bag for effect because it was
> during the anthrax scare---and BOTH of you seem to fit the psychotic,
> babbling, threatening, "outraged" idiots that would do something
> criminal)
So YOU claim you "visited the FBI" but I'm supposed to call them
for proof.
Why don't you surprise me? YOU provide proof any of this ever
happened.
Remember what I told you: Assertions aren't facts and assertions of
proof
aren't proof.
> "Really sick guys", they said. No mention of the "Katherine Harris"
> accusations included in the e-mails I had printed out---only about
> what a doofus you (and Beck) were to be acting like gradeschoolers.
So you ADMIT you threatened Katherine Harris and got your ass pitched
off
your former ISP just about the time a new ISP opened up.
How convenient for you, huh?
LOL
After that you got pwned by RCMAN a time or two. Remember the
"informer" that
made a fool out of you for nearly a month?
Then you published my home address for some stupid reason and got
slapped
yet AGAIN.
> "But, keep a record and if it continues, We'll turn it over to the
> attorney", they said.
>
> Too bad I didn't know about you hauling some slut back for Russia,
> they might have thought that was interesting enough to knock on your
> door.
You're like a broken record, Gary. Can't you at least embellish this
fantasy
a bit? Add more "details"? Ever been to Russia? Ever been even in a
subway?
Ever been in a town where the streets weren't paved with dirt? Ha!
See what you can do, 'k?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 9, 2012, 8:18:02 PM7/9/12
to
On Jul 7, 8:43 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:53:31 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> blubbering demands we stop "stalking you" (on the net) and making fun
> of you?
You know, I will give this to Kennemur, Jamieson and most others of
the Loony
Left in these groups - they're mostly an awful lot smarter than you.
I used to really laugh watching you get kicked around the yahoo weasel
group.
Especially entertaining were your simpering, wimpering retorts.
Why have you stopped posting there?
> My, that must really have been a blow to finally see me let everyone
> know you were making dozens of crank, hang-up phone calls....
>
> You never did say goodby after the last IDT complaint got you laughed
> at for posting your calls.
The word is 'goodbye', Gary.
Are you *really the best to ever come out of ole LHS?
<snickers>
> Or did you get out of town too fast?
>
> BTW, still searching for the "Subway bride of yours"??
I'm curious - why did you put subway brid of yours in double-quotes?
I simply ask for information.
> >=========================================================
>
> http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3245&id=482792...
Thanks for providing the proof you posted my home address, Gary.
You really are stupid.
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:53:31 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry, but it was about the time I was laughing, ridiculing, kicking
> >> your ass over what a dumb bastard you were for getting drunk and
> >> forgetting about Caller ID
>
> >Really? When was that, Gary? Can you be specific? Can you provide
> >proof that you ever did any of that? Remember, all your posts have
> >disappeared
> >from the archive because you're a coward.
>
> >Except, of course, for the posts that I saved.
>
> Have you saved the ones of Volt, Zepp and me replying to your crying,
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry, but it was about the time I was laughing, ridiculing, kicking
> >> your ass over what a dumb bastard you were for getting drunk and
> >> forgetting about Caller ID
>
> >Really? When was that, Gary? Can you be specific? Can you provide
> >proof that you ever did any of that? Remember, all your posts have
> >disappeared
> >from the archive because you're a coward.
>
> >Except, of course, for the posts that I saved.
>
> blubbering demands we stop "stalking you" (on the net) and making fun
> of you?
You know, I will give this to Kennemur, Jamieson and most others of
the Loony
Left in these groups - they're mostly an awful lot smarter than you.
I used to really laugh watching you get kicked around the yahoo weasel
group.
Especially entertaining were your simpering, wimpering retorts.
Why have you stopped posting there?
> My, that must really have been a blow to finally see me let everyone
> know you were making dozens of crank, hang-up phone calls....
>
> You never did say goodby after the last IDT complaint got you laughed
> at for posting your calls.
The word is 'goodbye', Gary.
Are you *really the best to ever come out of ole LHS?
<snickers>
> Or did you get out of town too fast?
>
> BTW, still searching for the "Subway bride of yours"??
I'm curious - why did you put subway brid of yours in double-quotes?
I simply ask for information.
> >=========================================================
>
> http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3245&id=482792...
Thanks for providing the proof you posted my home address, Gary.
You really are stupid.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 10, 2012, 10:35:17 PM7/10/12
to
On Jul 9, 10:31 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
No, actually they didn't. Kennemur and Brewster are gone along with
most of the
others. I'm still here.
> >I used to really laugh watching you get kicked around the yahoo weasel
> >group.
> >Especially entertaining were your simpering, wimpering retorts.
>
> And some examples of that would be----??
Happy to....right after you post proof I ever called you.
Can you do it?
<snickers>
> >Why have you stopped posting there?
>
> Last I heard---it's no longer there.
Nope. Still there and still laughing at your inept postings, I'm sure.
>
> >> My, that must really have been a blow to finally see me let everyone
> >> know you were making dozens of crank, hang-up phone calls....
>
> >> You never did say goodby after the last IDT complaint got you laughed
> >> at for posting your calls.
>
> >The word is 'goodbye', Gary.
>
> THen how come you never said anything when you called?
> Knickkers?
It was *you who published *my home address, Stalker.
> You called me---that's how I knew where you lived and what your phone
> number is. It's called Caller ID.
You have no proof, Gary, and it drives you crazy.
Remember: Assertion is not proof.
> Did you pay one of those sites to look up information?
The same site you used to look up my address so you could post it on
Usenet?
Probably.
> ><snickers>
>
> >> Or did you get out of town too fast?
>
> >> BTW, still searching for the "Subway bride of yours"??
>
> >I'm curious - why did you put subway brid of yours in double-quotes?
> >I simply ask for information.
>
> '
> Why not explain why you found her there.
Why are you so interested in my wife, Gary? Do you want to stalk her
too?
> >> >=========================================================
>
> >>http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3245&id=482792...
>
> >Thanks for providing the proof you posted my home address, Gary.
>
> >You really are stupid.
>
> You really ought to find out who originally did.
Why? You posted it and that was all it took for you to get slapped.
I dare you to post it again, Gary. You'd like to do it but you're
afraid to.
You are, aren't you?
> Was it you----drunk and forgot?
My point is you're a laughable village idiot and it shows with every
post
here and in the weasel group.
Is that why you don't post there any more?
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 7, 8:43 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:53:31 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Sorry, but it was about the time I was laughing, ridiculing, kicking
> >> >> your ass over what a dumb bastard you were for getting drunk and
> >> >> forgetting about Caller ID
>
> >> >Really? When was that, Gary? Can you be specific? Can you provide
> >> >proof that you ever did any of that? Remember, all your posts have
> >> >disappeared
> >> >from the archive because you're a coward.
>
> >> >Except, of course, for the posts that I saved.
>
> >> Have you saved the ones of Volt, Zepp and me replying to your crying,
> >> blubbering demands we stop "stalking you" (on the net) and making fun
> >> of you?
>
> >You know, I will give this to Kennemur, Jamieson and most others of
> >the Loony
> >Left in these groups - they're mostly an awful lot smarter than you.
>
> Well, they kept you out.
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 7, 8:43 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:53:31 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Sorry, but it was about the time I was laughing, ridiculing, kicking
> >> >> your ass over what a dumb bastard you were for getting drunk and
> >> >> forgetting about Caller ID
>
> >> >Really? When was that, Gary? Can you be specific? Can you provide
> >> >proof that you ever did any of that? Remember, all your posts have
> >> >disappeared
> >> >from the archive because you're a coward.
>
> >> >Except, of course, for the posts that I saved.
>
> >> Have you saved the ones of Volt, Zepp and me replying to your crying,
> >> blubbering demands we stop "stalking you" (on the net) and making fun
> >> of you?
>
> >You know, I will give this to Kennemur, Jamieson and most others of
> >the Loony
> >Left in these groups - they're mostly an awful lot smarter than you.
>
No, actually they didn't. Kennemur and Brewster are gone along with
most of the
others. I'm still here.
> >I used to really laugh watching you get kicked around the yahoo weasel
> >group.
> >Especially entertaining were your simpering, wimpering retorts.
>
Happy to....right after you post proof I ever called you.
Can you do it?
<snickers>
> >Why have you stopped posting there?
>
Nope. Still there and still laughing at your inept postings, I'm sure.
>
> >> My, that must really have been a blow to finally see me let everyone
> >> know you were making dozens of crank, hang-up phone calls....
>
> >> You never did say goodby after the last IDT complaint got you laughed
> >> at for posting your calls.
>
> >The word is 'goodbye', Gary.
>
>
> >Are you *really the best to ever come out of ole LHS?
>
> Did you really actually spend time looking for personal stuff,
> >Are you *really the best to ever come out of ole LHS?
>
> Knickkers?
It was *you who published *my home address, Stalker.
> You called me---that's how I knew where you lived and what your phone
> number is. It's called Caller ID.
You have no proof, Gary, and it drives you crazy.
Remember: Assertion is not proof.
> Did you pay one of those sites to look up information?
The same site you used to look up my address so you could post it on
Usenet?
Probably.
> ><snickers>
>
> >> Or did you get out of town too fast?
>
> >> BTW, still searching for the "Subway bride of yours"??
>
> >I'm curious - why did you put subway brid of yours in double-quotes?
> >I simply ask for information.
>
> Why not explain why you found her there.
Why are you so interested in my wife, Gary? Do you want to stalk her
too?
> >> >=========================================================
>
> >>http://www.usenetmessages.com/view.php?c=alternative&g=3245&id=482792...
>
> >Thanks for providing the proof you posted my home address, Gary.
>
> >You really are stupid.
>
Why? You posted it and that was all it took for you to get slapped.
I dare you to post it again, Gary. You'd like to do it but you're
afraid to.
You are, aren't you?
> Was it you----drunk and forgot?
>
>
>
>
>
> >----------------------------
> >Re: Annual update on Weasel group
> > Posted by: "rosel...@enetis.net" rosel...@enetis.net
>
>
>
>
> >----------------------------
> >Re: Annual update on Weasel group
> > Date: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:30 pm ((PDT))
>
> >On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>
> >>What other essential actions must we not mention on this list?
> >> It's important to cover them all. We would not want to miss the best
> > of the worst for inattention.
>
> >The point is that "someone" is feeding the bad guys
> >with information they in turn use against all of us.
>
> >Those they feed are not interested in discourse, or
> >argument ---or any of the things this group originally
> >represented---but merely to sabotege.
>
> >Years ago this group was able to talk about personal
> >things of interest.
>
> >Now it's merely a conduit of pissing and moaning and
> >those that are disagreed with are punished by using
> >outsiders.
>
> Your point is?
>
> >On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>
> >>What other essential actions must we not mention on this list?
> >> It's important to cover them all. We would not want to miss the best
> > of the worst for inattention.
>
> >The point is that "someone" is feeding the bad guys
> >with information they in turn use against all of us.
>
> >Those they feed are not interested in discourse, or
> >argument ---or any of the things this group originally
> >represented---but merely to sabotege.
>
> >Years ago this group was able to talk about personal
> >things of interest.
>
> >Now it's merely a conduit of pissing and moaning and
> >those that are disagreed with are punished by using
> >outsiders.
>
My point is you're a laughable village idiot and it shows with every
post
here and in the weasel group.
Is that why you don't post there any more?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 11, 2012, 8:54:21 PM7/11/12
to
On Jul 9, 10:31 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 7, 8:43 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:53:31 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Sorry, but it was about the time I was laughing, ridiculing, kicking
> >> >> your ass over what a dumb bastard you were for getting drunk and
> >> >> forgetting about Caller ID
>
> >> >Really? When was that, Gary? Can you be specific? Can you provide
> >> >proof that you ever did any of that? Remember, all your posts have
> >> >disappeared
> >> >from the archive because you're a coward.
>
> >> >Except, of course, for the posts that I saved.
>
> >> Have you saved the ones of Volt, Zepp and me replying to your crying,
> >> blubbering demands we stop "stalking you" (on the net) and making fun
> >> of you?
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 7, 8:43 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:53:31 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Sorry, but it was about the time I was laughing, ridiculing, kicking
> >> >> your ass over what a dumb bastard you were for getting drunk and
> >> >> forgetting about Caller ID
>
> >> >Really? When was that, Gary? Can you be specific? Can you provide
> >> >proof that you ever did any of that? Remember, all your posts have
> >> >disappeared
> >> >from the archive because you're a coward.
>
> >> >Except, of course, for the posts that I saved.
>
> >> Have you saved the ones of Volt, Zepp and me replying to your crying,
> >> blubbering demands we stop "stalking you" (on the net) and making fun
> >> of you?
> >I used to really laugh watching you get kicked around the yahoo weasel
> >group.
> >Especially entertaining were your simpering, wimpering retorts.
>
> And some examples of that would be----??
Happy to....right after you post proof I ever called you.
Can you do it?
You can't, can you?
> >group.
> >Especially entertaining were your simpering, wimpering retorts.
>
> And some examples of that would be----??
Happy to....right after you post proof I ever called you.
Can you do it?
<snickers>
> >Why have you stopped posting there?
>
> Last I heard---it's no longer there.
Nope. Still there and still laughing at your inept postings, I'm sure.
>
> >> My, that must really have been a blow to finally see me let everyone
> >> know you were making dozens of crank, hang-up phone calls....
>
> >> You never did say goodby after the last IDT complaint got you laughed
> >> at for posting your calls.
>
> >The word is 'goodbye', Gary.
>
> THen how come you never said anything when you called?
>
> >Are you *really the best to ever come out of ole LHS?
>
> Did you really actually spend time looking for personal stuff,
> Knickkers?
Is that why you try to hide your posts. You stalk and then hide.
You're yellow, aren't you?
government subsidized housing.
Message has been deleted
knicklas
Jul 12, 2012, 7:28:13 AM7/12/12
to
On Jul 12, 1:12 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:54:21 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> morning after I posted your area code and state, Kurtie
>
> BWHWHAHAHAHA
Indeed. So what you're saying is that if you claim something and I
laugh
at your untrue assertion then that denial is proof of the truth of
your assertion.
LOL
I think you need your pacemaker checked. You have a deficiency of
blood
to the brain.
> (that and the 7 complaints you filed with IDT claiming I "stalked
> you")
>
> When the IDT tech rep got done laughing at you, I turned Becks mail,
> my phone log (from the phone company) and your printed out posts over
> to an FBI agent
You keep saying this over and over, Tin Can Sailor, without any proof.
Assertion isn't proof.
> "really sick guys---but keep a record and if it continues---we'll turn
> it over to the attorney".
>
> Then---POOF----Knicklas and Beck left the net.
<yawn> Don't know about Beck but I'm still here and always have been.
MOF, I've been here longer than you have.
Now, why was it exactly that you published my home address on the Net?
> You're as goofy as you were when I was kicking your ass over harris
>
> Now I've got you back, you got no "subway wife", no
> credibility,---nothing, Knickkkers
You say that as if the mere repetition makes it true, Seaman.
Can you understand why you're the Usenet Village Idiot?
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:54:21 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >I used to really laugh watching you get kicked around the yahoo weasel
> >> >group.
> >> >Especially entertaining were your simpering, wimpering retorts.
>
> >> And some examples of that would be----??
>
> >Happy to....right after you post proof I ever called you.
>
> All the proof needed was the denial, spluttering, (more denial) the
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >I used to really laugh watching you get kicked around the yahoo weasel
> >> >group.
> >> >Especially entertaining were your simpering, wimpering retorts.
>
> >> And some examples of that would be----??
>
> >Happy to....right after you post proof I ever called you.
>
> morning after I posted your area code and state, Kurtie
>
> BWHWHAHAHAHA
Indeed. So what you're saying is that if you claim something and I
laugh
at your untrue assertion then that denial is proof of the truth of
your assertion.
LOL
I think you need your pacemaker checked. You have a deficiency of
blood
to the brain.
> (that and the 7 complaints you filed with IDT claiming I "stalked
> you")
>
> When the IDT tech rep got done laughing at you, I turned Becks mail,
> my phone log (from the phone company) and your printed out posts over
> to an FBI agent
You keep saying this over and over, Tin Can Sailor, without any proof.
Assertion isn't proof.
> "really sick guys---but keep a record and if it continues---we'll turn
> it over to the attorney".
>
> Then---POOF----Knicklas and Beck left the net.
<yawn> Don't know about Beck but I'm still here and always have been.
MOF, I've been here longer than you have.
Now, why was it exactly that you published my home address on the Net?
> You're as goofy as you were when I was kicking your ass over harris
>
> Now I've got you back, you got no "subway wife", no
> credibility,---nothing, Knickkkers
You say that as if the mere repetition makes it true, Seaman.
Can you understand why you're the Usenet Village Idiot?
B. Terry
Jul 12, 2012, 8:36:00 AM7/12/12
to
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
tetley
Jul 12, 2012, 3:39:06 PM7/12/12
to
On 7/12/2012 8:30 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> "tin Can sailor" would be the result of an effort and search of
> personal information--
The Amazing Usenet Intellect Of HUD subsidized, 70-year old, Rapid City,
SD moron Gary 'Yoorg' Roselles:
"She should be at least shot" -- Gary Roselles calling for the shooting
death of duly elected US government official Katherine Harris
"I call Kathering Harris a nazi/fascist right wing ideologue whore. What
didwe do to German nazis right wing whores?" -- Roselles clearly states
his motive for gunning down Katherine Harris in cold-blood
"I consider hating RIGHT WING nazi/fascist fucks like you a God inspired
emotion." -- Sociopath Roselles enters Charles Manson territory as he
claims his foam-flecked hatred and calls to murder are divinely 'inspired'
"Hating RIGHT WINGERS is doing God's work, Dumbapropyl." -- More
Manson-like megalomania from usenet sociopath Gary Roselles
"Who gives a shit what these nuts (religious groups) want or don't want
-- KORESH THEM ALL" -- Psychopath Gary Roselles calls for widespread
fiery deaths of US Religious Groups by the ATF.
"May a real american have the honor of putting a bullet between her
eyes." -- Gary Roselles calls for the brutal shooting death of Rob
Robertson's teenage daughter.
"Go Ahead and put his face there. I ain't blowed a mountain up today. I
can make it (blowing up Mt. Rushmore) look like a mining accident" --
Ex-miner <chuckle> and Rapid City resident Gary Roselles threatens to
blow up Mt. Rushmore.
"Hinckley TRIED to do a good thing" -- Gary Roselles praises would-be
presidential assassin John Hinckley
"That slut Barbara Olsen (9/11 victim) is dead? GOOD!" On 12 Sept 2001
08:42:54 GMT Gary Roselles <rosell19> wrote. That's right folks --
sociopath Gary Roselles really did gloat about the 9/11 death of fellow
citizen Barbara Olsen ON SEPTEMBER TWELFTH!!!
"God turned Olsen into jelly" -- Psychopath Gary Roselles says "God
killed" US 9/11 victim Barbara Olsen
"Then why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?" -
Gary 'yoorg' Roselles, racist prick
What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (Distinguished African-
American Scholar, Thomas) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having

worked a day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?" -- Gary Roselles
"Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
‘discusses’ African-American Dr.’s Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams
and the importance of Race Loyalty
"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
"Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
"He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them blacksâ€
should "stick 
to their own kind"
"His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles

slurs African-American Hero General Colin Powell
"Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
"Say "yes Massa", Uncle Tom." – Vile racist Gary Roselles pathetically
mocks and 
slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
Peterson
"How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
"Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
"Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
"Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
"The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
-- Gary Roselles
> "tin Can sailor" would be the result of an effort and search of
> personal information--
The Amazing Usenet Intellect Of HUD subsidized, 70-year old, Rapid City,
SD moron Gary 'Yoorg' Roselles:
"She should be at least shot" -- Gary Roselles calling for the shooting
death of duly elected US government official Katherine Harris
"I call Kathering Harris a nazi/fascist right wing ideologue whore. What
didwe do to German nazis right wing whores?" -- Roselles clearly states
his motive for gunning down Katherine Harris in cold-blood
"I consider hating RIGHT WING nazi/fascist fucks like you a God inspired
emotion." -- Sociopath Roselles enters Charles Manson territory as he
claims his foam-flecked hatred and calls to murder are divinely 'inspired'
"Hating RIGHT WINGERS is doing God's work, Dumbapropyl." -- More
Manson-like megalomania from usenet sociopath Gary Roselles
"Who gives a shit what these nuts (religious groups) want or don't want
-- KORESH THEM ALL" -- Psychopath Gary Roselles calls for widespread
fiery deaths of US Religious Groups by the ATF.
"May a real american have the honor of putting a bullet between her
eyes." -- Gary Roselles calls for the brutal shooting death of Rob
Robertson's teenage daughter.
"Go Ahead and put his face there. I ain't blowed a mountain up today. I
can make it (blowing up Mt. Rushmore) look like a mining accident" --
Ex-miner <chuckle> and Rapid City resident Gary Roselles threatens to
blow up Mt. Rushmore.
"Hinckley TRIED to do a good thing" -- Gary Roselles praises would-be
presidential assassin John Hinckley
"That slut Barbara Olsen (9/11 victim) is dead? GOOD!" On 12 Sept 2001
08:42:54 GMT Gary Roselles <rosell19> wrote. That's right folks --
sociopath Gary Roselles really did gloat about the 9/11 death of fellow
citizen Barbara Olsen ON SEPTEMBER TWELFTH!!!
"God turned Olsen into jelly" -- Psychopath Gary Roselles says "God
killed" US 9/11 victim Barbara Olsen
"Then why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?" -
Gary 'yoorg' Roselles, racist prick
What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (Distinguished African-
American Scholar, Thomas) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having

worked a day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?" -- Gary Roselles
"Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
‘discusses’ African-American Dr.’s Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams
and the importance of Race Loyalty
"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
"Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
"He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them blacksâ€
should "stick 
to their own kind"
"His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles

slurs African-American Hero General Colin Powell
"Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
"Say "yes Massa", Uncle Tom." – Vile racist Gary Roselles pathetically
mocks and 
slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
Peterson
"How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
"Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
"Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
"Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
"The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
-- Gary Roselles
tetley
Jul 12, 2012, 3:39:20 PM7/12/12
to
On 7/12/2012 8:26 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> I'm saying that everyone on the usenet knows that
> I'm saying that everyone on the usenet knows that
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 12, 2012, 8:18:40 PM7/12/12
to
On Jul 12, 3:39 pm, tetley <a...@dev.nul> wrote:
> On 7/12/2012 8:26 AM, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:> I'm saying that everyone on the usenet knows that
> should "stick to their own kind"
> mocks and slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
with a deliberate ignorance.
> On 7/12/2012 8:26 AM, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:> I'm saying that everyone on the usenet knows that
>
worked a day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
> ‘discusses’ African-American Dr.’s Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams
>
> "Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
> and the importance of Race Loyalty
>
> "You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
> going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
> Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them blacks”
>
> "You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
> going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
> should "stick to their own kind"
>
> "His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
> tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
> "His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
> tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
>
slurs African-American Hero General Colin Powell
>
> "Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
> Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
>
> "Say "yes Massa", Uncle Tom." – Vile racist Gary Roselles pathetically
>
> "Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
> Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
>
> mocks and slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
> Peterson
>
> "How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
> judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
> on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
>
> "Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
>
> "Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
>
> "Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
> -- Gary Roselles
Roselles typifiies the Left: Lies, hate and irrationality combined
>
> "How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
> judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
> on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
>
> "Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
>
> "Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
>
> "Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
> -- Gary Roselles
with a deliberate ignorance.
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 12, 2012, 8:20:34 PM7/12/12
to
On Jul 12, 10:26 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:28:13 -0700 (PDT), knicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Happy to....right after you post proof I ever called you.
>
> >> All the proof needed was the denial, spluttering, (more denial) the
> >> morning after I posted your area code and state, Kurtie
>
> >> BWHWHAHAHAHA
>
> >Indeed. So what you're saying is that if you claim something and I
> >laugh
> >at your untrue assertion then that denial is proof of the truth of
> >your assertion.
>
> Nope
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Happy to....right after you post proof I ever called you.
>
> >> All the proof needed was the denial, spluttering, (more denial) the
> >> morning after I posted your area code and state, Kurtie
>
> >> BWHWHAHAHAHA
>
> >Indeed. So what you're saying is that if you claim something and I
> >laugh
> >at your untrue assertion then that denial is proof of the truth of
> >your assertion.
>
>
> I'm saying that everyone on the usenet knows that when I outed you,
> you kept silent for weeks.
The only one on Usenet who knows or cares about this lie is you,
Seaman.
I'm here. I've always been here. I've always been laughing at you.
> Also saying that when I contacted the FBI with the record of your
> calls, Becks card, printouts of your Posts, that both of you were gone
> within days.
Prove it. Assertion is not proof, Gary.
> I'm also saying that you've admitted dozens of complaints filed with
> ISP's of those who made fun of you, claiming that laughing at you is
> "stalking".
I certainly complained about your death threat against a US
Congresswoman
which resulted in your ISP giving you the boot.
You have no proof I made any more complaints.
> I'm also saying that anyone who knows you, can look at the lengths you
> went to counter the ridicule by making up a silly "hate-page" that
> couldn't pass a laugh test and think "this guy is a pathologically
> imbalanced nutjob".
What "hate-page", Gary? Prove I ever put up such a page.
Why do you continue to make assertions without proof? Do you suppose
everyone is your equal in stupidity and hate-filled desperation?
> MOF, that what a lot of posters started telling you.
Really? Prove it.
On the other hand, you *have called for the death of Katherine Harris
and
posted my home address in a public forum.
Unlike you, I can *prove my assertions and that's what's driving you
bonkers apparently.
> It's also fairly clear that when I was kicking your ass, and it was
> revealed that you were filing complaints---that the ridicule and the
> complaints were linked together.
So one you make one unproved assertion and then use that to prove
another otherwise
unproved assertion?
Do you REALLY think you're convincing anyone here? Do you suppose
simply repeating
unproven assertions is going to convince anyone of anything??
> So----Are you once again going to start filing dozens of Complaints
> because you're being made fun of again?
I'm laughing at you, Gary, and exposing your unintelligible, unproven
assertions to the
general disdain of all and sundry? In the absence of any threats on or
part, what's to
complain about there?
Next?
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 12, 2012, 8:25:21 PM7/12/12
to
On Jul 12, 3:39 pm, tetley <a...@dev.nul> wrote:
> On 7/12/2012 8:26 AM, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:> I'm saying that everyone on the usenet knows that
>
worked a day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
> ‘discusses’ African-American Dr.’s Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams
>
> "Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
> and the importance of Race Loyalty
>
> "You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
> going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
> Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them blacks”
>
> "You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
> going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
> should "stick to their own kind"
>
> "His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
> tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
> "His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
> tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
>
slurs African-American Hero General Colin Powell
>
> "Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
> Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
>
> "Say "yes Massa", Uncle Tom." – Vile racist Gary Roselles pathetically
>
> "Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
> Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
>
> mocks and slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
> Peterson
>
> "How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
> judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
> on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
>
> "Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
>
> "Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
>
> "Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
> -- Gary Roselles
These quotes - like the one about Communists being rightwingers -
>
> "How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
> judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
> on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
>
> "Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
>
> "Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
>
> "Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
> -- Gary Roselles
remind me of all the
fun I've had over the years ridiculing this loon. Where DOES he get
those ludicrous ideas??
Steve
Jul 12, 2012, 8:38:06 PM7/12/12
to
>>
>> "Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
>> ‘discusses’ African-American Dr.’s Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams
>> and the importance of Race Loyalty
>>
>> "You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
>> going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>>
>> "Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>>
>> "He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
>> Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them blacks”
>> should "stick ?to their own kind"
>> "Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
>> ‘discusses’ African-American Dr.’s Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams
>> and the importance of Race Loyalty
>>
>> "You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
>> going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>>
>> "Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>>
>> "He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
>> Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them blacks”
>>
>> "His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
>> tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
>> ?slurs African-American Hero General Colin Powell
>> "His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
>> tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
>>
>> "Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
>> Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
>>
>> "Say "yes Massa", Uncle Tom." – Vile racist Gary Roselles pathetically
>> mocks and ?slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
>> "Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
>> Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
>>
>> "Say "yes Massa", Uncle Tom." – Vile racist Gary Roselles pathetically
>> Peterson
>>
>> "How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
>> judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
>> on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
>>
>> "Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
>>
>> "Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
>>
>> "Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
>>
>> "The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
>> -- Gary Roselles
>
>These quotes - like the one about Communists being rightwingers -
>remind me of all the
>fun I've had over the years ridiculing this loon. Where DOES he get
>those ludicrous ideas??
I've had to killfile Roselles because so often I read his posts while
>>
>> "How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
>> judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
>> on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
>>
>> "Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
>>
>> "Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
>>
>> "Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
>>
>> "The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
>> -- Gary Roselles
>
>These quotes - like the one about Communists being rightwingers -
>remind me of all the
>fun I've had over the years ridiculing this loon. Where DOES he get
>those ludicrous ideas??
I've drinking something, (coffee in the morning, soda in the
afternoon, wine at night) and his stupidity sometimes made me laugh so
hard I'd have wine coming out my nose...
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 16, 2012, 7:20:09 AM7/16/12
to
On Jul 13, 10:30 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:28:13 -0700 (PDT), knicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:28:13 -0700 (PDT), knicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >You keep saying this over and over, Tin Can Sailor, without any proof.
>
> Don't need to
>
Yes, actually you do.
> Everyone who knew you before I ran you off, knew it was exactly the
> thing you'd do.
I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
> You're so stupid you'd post your own address and claim someone else
> did it.
LOL Ah, now it's ME who posted my own address and that link to YOUR
post
from just yesterday doesn't exist, huh?
Tin Can Sailor, you're much too old to act like an adolescent.
> Since I never took the time to find out personal stuff like you have,
> you're fucked again, Knickkkers.
>
> "tin Can sailor" would be the result of an effort and search of
> personal information---along with all the other things you've come up
> "tin Can sailor" would be the result of an effort and search of
> with.
You published my home address on Usenet, you silly person. You got
warned
about doing it and you stopped.
Why aren't you willing to take responsibility for messing up instead
of trying
to get others to take the blame.
Grow up.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
tetley
Jul 16, 2012, 1:41:08 PM7/16/12
to
On 7/16/2012 7:02 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> CLICK ! ! !

worked a day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?" -- Gary Roselles
"Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
‘discusses’ African-American Dr.’s Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams
"His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles

slurs African-American Hero General Colin Powell
"Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
"Say "yes Massa", Uncle Tom." – Vile racist Gary Roselles pathetically
mocks and 
slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
> CLICK ! ! !
"Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
and the importance of Race Loyalty
"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
"Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
"He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
"Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
"He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them blacksâ€
should "stick 
to their own kind"
"His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
"Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
mocks and 
slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
tetley
Jul 16, 2012, 1:41:22 PM7/16/12
to
On 7/16/2012 7:02 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> No wonder that "bride" left you.
tetley
Jul 16, 2012, 1:41:48 PM7/16/12
to
On 7/16/2012 7:02 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> You never did say goodby
tetley
Jul 16, 2012, 1:42:17 PM7/16/12
to
On 7/16/2012 7:02 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> BWHAAHAHAHAHA
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 16, 2012, 5:58:00 PM7/16/12
to
On Jul 16, 1:42 pm, tetley <a...@dev.nul> wrote:
> should "stick to their own kind"
> mocks and slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
would really be interesting.
What about it, Gare? How'd you like to prove to us that Stalin, Lenin
and Mao were conservatives?
Are you up for it or is the ole pacemaker skipping beats these days?
<snickers>
>
worked a day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
> ‘discusses’ African-American Dr.’s Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams
>
> "Both are traitors to their race" -- Race Purist Gary Roselles
> and the importance of Race Loyalty
>
> "You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
> going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
> Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them blacks”
>
> "You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people is
> going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
>
> "He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own kind."
> should "stick to their own kind"
>
> "His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
> tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
> "His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an uncle
> tom to appease voters." -- White trash, racist asshole Gary Roselles
>
slurs African-American Hero General Colin Powell
>
> "Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
> Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
>
> "Say "yes Massa", Uncle Tom." – Vile racist Gary Roselles pathetically
>
> "Group Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coconut headed coon" --
> Gary Roselles, pathetic racist
>
> mocks and slurs prominent African-American man-of-the-cloth Jesse Lee
> Peterson
>
> "How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
> judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
> on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
>
> "Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
>
> "Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
>
> "Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
> -- Gary Roselles
I'd like to see Tin Can Gary defend some of these statements. That
>
> "How does a pampered, Stanford based, Scaife funded, Uncle Tom make
> judgements on "the bottom", McFly?" -- Another day, another racial slur
> on an educated, successful, independent black man from Gary Roselles
>
> "Nope, Don't have to hire blacks" -- Gary Roselles, Racist Prick
>
> "Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
>
> "Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary Roselles
>
> "The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the UN"
> -- Gary Roselles
would really be interesting.
What about it, Gare? How'd you like to prove to us that Stalin, Lenin
and Mao were conservatives?
Are you up for it or is the ole pacemaker skipping beats these days?
<snickers>
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 16, 2012, 6:00:12 PM7/16/12
to
On Jul 16, 9:01 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:20:09 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
BWAHAHA! It's not a lie to prang you for making claims for which you
have NO
evidence, Gare Bear.
The mere repetition of claims is not evidence.
It merely shows just how impotent you've become.
> When you got drunk and forgot about caller ID----that must have ruined
> your whole day.
> No one knew a thing about you, Kurtie----Zepp, Volt---hadn't a clue as
> to where you were.
>
> THen you made those crank calls----and ELON, NC came up (with your
> Telephone Number)
>
> You "left here", Knicklas.....(under that name)
> But seriously
> Are you feeling the pressure to regain some crediblity? Even after
> your "Moscow Subway wife" left? How sad.
When are you going to get a new song, Gary?
This one is flaccid. It's not working.
Got anything else?
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:20:09 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Everyone who knew you before I ran you off, knew it was exactly the
> >> thing you'd do.
>
> >I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
>
> Because lying is what you do best.
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Everyone who knew you before I ran you off, knew it was exactly the
> >> thing you'd do.
>
> >I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
>
BWAHAHA! It's not a lie to prang you for making claims for which you
have NO
evidence, Gare Bear.
The mere repetition of claims is not evidence.
It merely shows just how impotent you've become.
> When you got drunk and forgot about caller ID----that must have ruined
> your whole day.
> No one knew a thing about you, Kurtie----Zepp, Volt---hadn't a clue as
> to where you were.
>
> THen you made those crank calls----and ELON, NC came up (with your
> Telephone Number)
>
> You "left here", Knicklas.....(under that name)
> But seriously
> Are you feeling the pressure to regain some crediblity? Even after
> your "Moscow Subway wife" left? How sad.
When are you going to get a new song, Gary?
This one is flaccid. It's not working.
Got anything else?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 16, 2012, 8:17:26 PM7/16/12
to
On Jul 16, 8:03 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> Silvershitbag, Morton, Haskell have posted and reposted over and over
> again?
Don't want to face your quotes where you praised John Hinkley for
shooting Reagan?
Won't own that you called for the death of Katherine Harris?
Can't defend your laughable assertion that Stalin was a Conservative?
You're a coward, Roselles. You can dish it out but you can't take it.
You try to hide
your posts.
We - Left and Right - laugh in the general direction of your
government housing
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I'd like to see Tin Can Gary defend some of these statements. That
> >would really be interesting.
>
> You mean altered, forged, nonsense that Pajamadoody, Fujifart, You,
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I'd like to see Tin Can Gary defend some of these statements. That
> >would really be interesting.
>
> Silvershitbag, Morton, Haskell have posted and reposted over and over
> again?
Don't want to face your quotes where you praised John Hinkley for
shooting Reagan?
Won't own that you called for the death of Katherine Harris?
Can't defend your laughable assertion that Stalin was a Conservative?
You're a coward, Roselles. You can dish it out but you can't take it.
You try to hide
your posts.
We - Left and Right - laugh in the general direction of your
government housing
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 16, 2012, 8:21:32 PM7/16/12
to
On Jul 16, 8:07 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:00:12 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
I want to hear you do it. Not AFRAID of looking like a Village Idiot,
are you?
Hmmmmmm?
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:00:12 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 16, 9:01 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:20:09 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Everyone who knew you before I ran you off, knew it was exactly the
> >> >> thing you'd do.
>
> >> >I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
>
> >> Because lying is what you do best.
>
> >BWAHAHA! It's not a lie to prang you for making claims for which you
> >have NO
> >evidence, Gare Bear.
Hey, 'Yorg', why are you afraid to defend any of these quotes.
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 16, 9:01 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:20:09 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Everyone who knew you before I ran you off, knew it was exactly the
> >> >> thing you'd do.
>
> >> >I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
>
> >> Because lying is what you do best.
>
> >BWAHAHA! It's not a lie to prang you for making claims for which you
> >have NO
> >evidence, Gare Bear.
I want to hear you do it. Not AFRAID of looking like a Village Idiot,
are you?
Hmmmmmm?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 17, 2012, 7:28:30 AM7/17/12
to
On Jul 17, 12:41 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:17:26 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> Knickkers?
>
> Remember when you were demanding that Volt, Zepp and me were
> "harassing" and "stalking" you---forcing you to seek help by filing
> complaints with our ISP's?
>
> Or when you made those drunk hang-up phone calls from your Home phone?
>
> How did you think I got your NC town?
By stalking me.
Then you were stupid enough to publish my address on Usenet thereby
getting slapped.
Then, like a nice little coward, you did what they told you to do and
STOPPED posting it.
Little coward, you.....
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:17:26 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Don't want to face your quotes where you praised John Hinkley for
> >shooting Reagan?
>
> Don't you want to hear laughter at you day after day like after 2000,
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Don't want to face your quotes where you praised John Hinkley for
> >shooting Reagan?
>
> Knickkers?
>
> Remember when you were demanding that Volt, Zepp and me were
> "harassing" and "stalking" you---forcing you to seek help by filing
> complaints with our ISP's?
>
> Or when you made those drunk hang-up phone calls from your Home phone?
>
> How did you think I got your NC town?
By stalking me.
Then you were stupid enough to publish my address on Usenet thereby
getting slapped.
Then, like a nice little coward, you did what they told you to do and
STOPPED posting it.
Little coward, you.....
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 17, 2012, 7:30:51 AM7/17/12
to
On Jul 17, 12:43 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> Why are you afraid t admit you left here in shame after I outed you as
> a drunk crank caller?
>
> From Elon, NC
>
> Did you forget Caller ID?
>
> Hmmm
"Stalin is a conservative".
That's what you said.
How STOOOPID could you be?!
No wonder you won't defend it.
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hey, 'Yorg', why are you afraid to defend any of these quotes.
>
> Hey Knickkkers
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hey, 'Yorg', why are you afraid to defend any of these quotes.
>
>
> Why are you afraid t admit you left here in shame after I outed you as
> a drunk crank caller?
>
> From Elon, NC
>
> Did you forget Caller ID?
>
> Hmmm
"Stalin is a conservative".
That's what you said.
How STOOOPID could you be?!
No wonder you won't defend it.
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 17, 2012, 5:52:04 PM7/17/12
to
On Jul 12, 10:30 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:28:13 -0700 (PDT), knicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >You keep saying this over and over, Tin Can Sailor, without any proof.
>
> Don't need to
Yes, actually you do.
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:28:13 -0700 (PDT), knicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >You keep saying this over and over, Tin Can Sailor, without any proof.
>
> Don't need to
Yes, actually you do.
> Everyone who knew you before I ran you off, knew it was exactly the
> thing you'd do.
I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
> thing you'd do.
I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 17, 2012, 5:51:04 PM7/17/12
to
On Jul 17, 9:05 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 04:30:51 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
So you're saying Stalin was a conservative communist? BWAHAHAHAHA
Since when does a conservative advocate the workers control of
factories and
central control and planning of the economy?
How stupid are you?
> >That's what you said.
>
> Totalitarian political positions are definitely conservative,
> rightwing, militaristic, racist, homophobic, ultranationalistic,
> xenophobic.
Stalin embodied every leftwing principle that you and your USW buddies
used to spout. Do you want me repeat them?
He was a Communist. You're really going to say he was both rightwing
AND leftwing?
Do you understand anything whatever about political theories?
Stalin was a leftwing dictator, you ignorant, brainless dolt.
Do you know anything about communism? Do I have to school you on THIS
too?
Basically, Gary, your circular logic is this: In your view all
conservative governments are
militaristic. In your view the Soviet Union was militaristic
therefore, in your view, the
Soviet Union must have been conservative.
Now do you see why we laugh at you?
> Maybe your Russian "Subway wife" ran off with someone you consider
> should still drink from different fountains?
Even for you that question (was it really a question?) is so
spectacularly incoherent. I'm glad I wasn't
drinking anything when I read it or I probably would have ruined my
keyboard.
It really is one reason why I keep talking to you, Gare. You're a
GREAT source of fine humor! Good thing
is I can ALWAYS be certain that if I bait you long enough you'll come
through with some great 'quotes', especially
when you're trying to sound like something other than the semi-
educated, semi-literate hick that you are.
Stay stupid, 'k?
-------------
"Roselles is a permanent member of the army of men
who have ceased to think. Ronald Reagan, in the
throes of Alzheimer's the last decade, probably still
had more to say for himself than Gary, and was
probably much better company for those around him.
The joke is that Gary was probably a "drooling
vegetable" a long time before he started calling
Reagan one."
------ Martin McPhillips
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 04:30:51 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 17, 12:43 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Hey, 'Yorg', why are you afraid to defend any of these quotes.
>
> >> Hey Knickkkers
>
> >> Why are you afraid t admit you left here in shame after I outed you as
> >> a drunk crank caller?
>
> >> From Elon, NC
>
> >> Did you forget Caller ID?
>
> >> Hmmm
>
> >"Stalin is a conservative".
>
> Stalin Was conservative.
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 17, 12:43 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Hey, 'Yorg', why are you afraid to defend any of these quotes.
>
> >> Hey Knickkkers
>
> >> Why are you afraid t admit you left here in shame after I outed you as
> >> a drunk crank caller?
>
> >> From Elon, NC
>
> >> Did you forget Caller ID?
>
> >> Hmmm
>
> >"Stalin is a conservative".
>
So you're saying Stalin was a conservative communist? BWAHAHAHAHA
Since when does a conservative advocate the workers control of
factories and
central control and planning of the economy?
How stupid are you?
> >That's what you said.
>
> rightwing, militaristic, racist, homophobic, ultranationalistic,
> xenophobic.
Stalin embodied every leftwing principle that you and your USW buddies
used to spout. Do you want me repeat them?
He was a Communist. You're really going to say he was both rightwing
AND leftwing?
Do you understand anything whatever about political theories?
Stalin was a leftwing dictator, you ignorant, brainless dolt.
Do you know anything about communism? Do I have to school you on THIS
too?
Basically, Gary, your circular logic is this: In your view all
conservative governments are
militaristic. In your view the Soviet Union was militaristic
therefore, in your view, the
Soviet Union must have been conservative.
Now do you see why we laugh at you?
> Maybe your Russian "Subway wife" ran off with someone you consider
> should still drink from different fountains?
Even for you that question (was it really a question?) is so
spectacularly incoherent. I'm glad I wasn't
drinking anything when I read it or I probably would have ruined my
keyboard.
It really is one reason why I keep talking to you, Gare. You're a
GREAT source of fine humor! Good thing
is I can ALWAYS be certain that if I bait you long enough you'll come
through with some great 'quotes', especially
when you're trying to sound like something other than the semi-
educated, semi-literate hick that you are.
Stay stupid, 'k?
-------------
"Roselles is a permanent member of the army of men
who have ceased to think. Ronald Reagan, in the
throes of Alzheimer's the last decade, probably still
had more to say for himself than Gary, and was
probably much better company for those around him.
The joke is that Gary was probably a "drooling
vegetable" a long time before he started calling
Reagan one."
------ Martin McPhillips
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 17, 2012, 11:17:13 PM7/17/12
to
On Jul 17, 9:05 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 04:30:51 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 17, 12:43 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Hey, 'Yorg', why are you afraid to defend any of these quotes.
>
> >> Hey Knickkkers
>
> >> Why are you afraid t admit you left here in shame after I outed you as
> >> a drunk crank caller?
>
> >> From Elon, NC
>
> >> Did you forget Caller ID?
>
> >> Hmmm
>
> >"Stalin is a conservative".
>
> Stalin Was conservative.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 17, 12:43 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:32 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Hey, 'Yorg', why are you afraid to defend any of these quotes.
>
> >> Hey Knickkkers
>
> >> Why are you afraid t admit you left here in shame after I outed you as
> >> a drunk crank caller?
>
> >> From Elon, NC
>
> >> Did you forget Caller ID?
>
> >> Hmmm
>
> >"Stalin is a conservative".
>
>
> >That's what you said.
>
> >That's what you said.
>
> Totalitarian political positions are definitely conservative,
> rightwing, militaristic, racist, homophobic, ultranationalistic,
> xenophobic.
> You've defended every rightwing despot by siding with them,
> rightwing, militaristic, racist, homophobic, ultranationalistic,
> xenophobic.
> Knickkkers.
Really? Which rightwing despots have I "defended"?
I thought all despots were just despots. Now you talk about "rightwing
despots"?
So name me some.
Then name some *leftwing* despots.
This is a trick question so beware......
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 17, 2012, 11:13:20 PM7/17/12
to
On Jul 17, 8:44 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> was a capitalist?
I wouldn't argue that, you silly git, because few liberals are
capitalist.
> Are you?
So Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were conservatives??
> You do know that capitalism was a liberal philosophy?
Capitalism is not a philosophy. It is an economic system.
Are you aware that most conservatives support capitalism and, these
days,
the Left does not?
> >How stupid are you?
>
> Not stupid enough to get so pathologically incensed at being laughed
> at that I get drunk and forget Caller ID when making crank calls....
> >> >That's what you said.
>
> >> Totalitarian political positions are definitely conservative,
> >> rightwing, militaristic, racist, homophobic, ultranationalistic,
> >> xenophobic.
>
> >Stalin embodied every leftwing principle that you and your USW buddies
> >used to spout. Do you want me repeat them?
>
> Ah---so the Gulags, the starvation, the exploitation of workers, the
> centralization of power into few hands is "liberal" to you?
In the case of the Soviet Union the prison camps, centralization of
power and
economic control was essential to carrying out the economic theories
of communism.
Communism was not conservative OR "liberal". It was the extreme Left.
> >He was a Communist. You're really going to say he was both rightwing
> >AND leftwing?
>
> Nope, I'm saying that Economic systems have no relavancy in political
> ideology.
First of all, the word is 'relevance' and you're dead wrong. The
exteme right and
the extreme left all have their own ways of carrying out their
particular aims.
Your sloppy thinking makes it impossible to separate the true meanings
of the labels
you - in your ignorance - throw around with abandon.
All you have to do is look up the meaning of 'conservative' in any
dictionary - or try Wikipedia -
and you'll find that neither Stalin nor Castro nor Hitler fits into
the definition.
> Jesse Helms was as hard-core rightwing conservative
> (racist, homophobic, greedy, militaristic, ultranationalistic, and
> xenophobic as Hitler, Stalin, or Castro.
> conservative, rightwing, totalitarian, militaristic, greedy, racist,
> homophobic, xenophobic political moron uses isn't relevant to the
> issue.
Go back and read that sentence. It DIRECTLY contradicts the previous
sentence.
Do you understand why people laugh at you.
> >Stalin was a leftwing dictator, you ignorant, brainless dolt.
>
> Not so
>
> He used an economic system that is called "left" to delineate it from
> one which has less government control
Look up the term "Left", Seaman. You'll find it includes worker
control of the means of production, central planning of the economy,
direct government control of education, suppression of religion....in
short, the program of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union which,
while he was alive and in power, was controlled by Joseph Stalin.
> Are you now saying that Jesse Helms was a Liberal just because he was
> a capitalist?
What is this obsession with Jesse Helms, Seaman??
In any case, see my answer to this silly question above.
> >Basically, Gary, your circular logic is this: In your view all
> >conservative government
>
> ....is reactionary, militaristic, greedy, racist, homophobic,
> ultranationalistic and xenohobic.
The word is 'xenophobic' and you don't have a clue what it means.
I have no doubt that even when Reagan was in his final days paralized
with
Alzheimer's he was still more capable of thought and expression than
you are
even on a good day.
And I imagine you don't have many good days.
> We can refer you to the historical record of Stalin, Hitler, Castro,
> Jesse Helms, Ronnie Raygun, and dicky Nixon.
>
> Not to mention Joe McCarthy, Karl Rove, James Dobson and you.
Your argument is basically: "I hate all these guys. I hate
conservatives
therefore they must all be conservatives."
Thanks. You have not proved your point.
Jospeh Dzugasvili was the General Secretary of the KPSU, Premier of
the USSR, Communist
and as such a far-left dicator and mass-murderer.
What he was NOT was a conservative in any sense that a normal person
defines the term.
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:51:04 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 17, 9:05 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 04:30:51 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 17, 9:05 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 04:30:51 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> >> Why are you afraid t admit you left here in shame after I outed you as
> >> >> a drunk crank caller?
>
> >> >> From Elon, NC
>
> >> >> Did you forget Caller ID?
>
> >> >> Hmmm
>
> >> >"Stalin is a conservative".
>
> >> Stalin Was conservative.
>
> >So you're saying Stalin was a conservative communist? BWAHAHAHAHA
>
> Unless you're going to argue that Jesse Helms was a liberal because he
> >> >> a drunk crank caller?
>
> >> >> From Elon, NC
>
> >> >> Did you forget Caller ID?
>
> >> >> Hmmm
>
> >> >"Stalin is a conservative".
>
> >> Stalin Was conservative.
>
> >So you're saying Stalin was a conservative communist? BWAHAHAHAHA
>
> was a capitalist?
I wouldn't argue that, you silly git, because few liberals are
capitalist.
> Are you?
>
> >Since when does a conservative advocate the workers control of
> >factories and
> >central control and planning of the economy?
>
> When they are rightwing and totalitarian.
> >Since when does a conservative advocate the workers control of
> >factories and
> >central control and planning of the economy?
>
So Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were conservatives??
> You do know that capitalism was a liberal philosophy?
Capitalism is not a philosophy. It is an economic system.
Are you aware that most conservatives support capitalism and, these
days,
the Left does not?
> >How stupid are you?
>
> Not stupid enough to get so pathologically incensed at being laughed
> at that I get drunk and forget Caller ID when making crank calls....
> >> >That's what you said.
>
> >> Totalitarian political positions are definitely conservative,
> >> rightwing, militaristic, racist, homophobic, ultranationalistic,
> >> xenophobic.
>
> >Stalin embodied every leftwing principle that you and your USW buddies
> >used to spout. Do you want me repeat them?
>
> centralization of power into few hands is "liberal" to you?
In the case of the Soviet Union the prison camps, centralization of
power and
economic control was essential to carrying out the economic theories
of communism.
Communism was not conservative OR "liberal". It was the extreme Left.
> >He was a Communist. You're really going to say he was both rightwing
> >AND leftwing?
>
> ideology.
First of all, the word is 'relevance' and you're dead wrong. The
exteme right and
the extreme left all have their own ways of carrying out their
particular aims.
Your sloppy thinking makes it impossible to separate the true meanings
of the labels
you - in your ignorance - throw around with abandon.
All you have to do is look up the meaning of 'conservative' in any
dictionary - or try Wikipedia -
and you'll find that neither Stalin nor Castro nor Hitler fits into
the definition.
> Jesse Helms was as hard-core rightwing conservative
> (racist, homophobic, greedy, militaristic, ultranationalistic, and
> xenophobic as Hitler, Stalin, or Castro.
>
> >Do you understand anything whatever about political theories?
>
> Yes, and you're attempting to suggest that whatever economic system a
> >Do you understand anything whatever about political theories?
>
> conservative, rightwing, totalitarian, militaristic, greedy, racist,
> homophobic, xenophobic political moron uses isn't relevant to the
> issue.
Go back and read that sentence. It DIRECTLY contradicts the previous
sentence.
Do you understand why people laugh at you.
> >Stalin was a leftwing dictator, you ignorant, brainless dolt.
>
>
> He used an economic system that is called "left" to delineate it from
> one which has less government control
Look up the term "Left", Seaman. You'll find it includes worker
control of the means of production, central planning of the economy,
direct government control of education, suppression of religion....in
short, the program of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union which,
while he was alive and in power, was controlled by Joseph Stalin.
> Are you now saying that Jesse Helms was a Liberal just because he was
> a capitalist?
What is this obsession with Jesse Helms, Seaman??
In any case, see my answer to this silly question above.
> >Basically, Gary, your circular logic is this: In your view all
> >conservative government
>
> ultranationalistic and xenohobic.
The word is 'xenophobic' and you don't have a clue what it means.
I have no doubt that even when Reagan was in his final days paralized
with
Alzheimer's he was still more capable of thought and expression than
you are
even on a good day.
And I imagine you don't have many good days.
> We can refer you to the historical record of Stalin, Hitler, Castro,
> Jesse Helms, Ronnie Raygun, and dicky Nixon.
>
> Not to mention Joe McCarthy, Karl Rove, James Dobson and you.
Your argument is basically: "I hate all these guys. I hate
conservatives
therefore they must all be conservatives."
Thanks. You have not proved your point.
Jospeh Dzugasvili was the General Secretary of the KPSU, Premier of
the USSR, Communist
and as such a far-left dicator and mass-murderer.
What he was NOT was a conservative in any sense that a normal person
defines the term.
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 18, 2012, 8:45:21 PM7/18/12
to
On Jul 18, 11:27 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:17:13 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
You can't name one, can you?
All you can do is make assertions over and over again as if the mere
repetition of your fog-headed formulas gives them meaning.
What a joke you are, Gary. You make me laugh.
But I do see you've given up trying to argue the Stalin was a
conservative.
That's smart. I know more about politics and history than you do,
Gary, and
I'm able to express myself better than you.
In any kind of argument you don't stand a chance with me, Gary. That's
why
you're forced to repeat the same pat phrases and empty, baseless
accusations over and over:
you have nothing else.
So now that you've given up defending that dunderheaded political
theory of yours how
about defending your claim that John Hinkley did a good thing when he
shot President
Reagan?
I think it shows just how much hate you have inside you.
What do you think?
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:17:13 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> You've defended every rightwing despot by siding with them,
> >> Knickkkers.
>
> >Really? Which rightwing despots have I "defended"?
>
> Conservative ones.
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> You've defended every rightwing despot by siding with them,
> >> Knickkkers.
>
> >Really? Which rightwing despots have I "defended"?
>
You can't name one, can you?
All you can do is make assertions over and over again as if the mere
repetition of your fog-headed formulas gives them meaning.
What a joke you are, Gary. You make me laugh.
But I do see you've given up trying to argue the Stalin was a
conservative.
That's smart. I know more about politics and history than you do,
Gary, and
I'm able to express myself better than you.
In any kind of argument you don't stand a chance with me, Gary. That's
why
you're forced to repeat the same pat phrases and empty, baseless
accusations over and over:
you have nothing else.
So now that you've given up defending that dunderheaded political
theory of yours how
about defending your claim that John Hinkley did a good thing when he
shot President
Reagan?
I think it shows just how much hate you have inside you.
What do you think?
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 18, 2012, 8:54:58 PM7/18/12
to
On Jul 17, 8:45 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:52:04 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
> Kurtie
>
> Maybe that's why your Moscow "subway bride" left you?
Yeah, no doubt. <snickers>
Now, Seaman, if you'd like to keep me from killfiling you again maybe
you
can tell me which of the following political propositions you would
support.
Can you do that or are you too yellow?
Here they are:
The building of a mass peoples party capable of contending for
governmental power, a party free of domination by any monopoly
interests;
Removal from the electoral system of the financial contributions of
monopolies, to be replaced by public funding and guarantees of honest
elections where each vote counts and all votes are counted;
Replacing the foreign policy of preemptive strikes and dictating to
the world in the interests of U.S.-based transnationals with a policy
of international cooperation to solve problems of war and aggression,
poverty, education, environment, health, and development;
Full restoration and expansion of the Bill of Rights and all
democratic rights; the complete separation of church and state;
Full legal protection from hate crimes and racial profiling, and the
outlawing of oral and written racist propaganda;
Implementation of affirmative action and compensatory programs to
achieve actual equality for the racially and nationally oppressed and
women;
Prevention of the freedom of monopolies to move assets in ways that
harm workers and communities without full compensation; the guaranteed
right to a job at living wages or full income through public works and
public service jobs; the growth of public ownership of industries;
Elimination of management prerogatives coupled with the expansion of
workers and union rights to prevent socially harmful management
decisions;
Full funding for education, affordable housing programs, day care,
Social Security, a universal health care program, youth job training
and recreation programs, and cultural programs;
Creation of a social fund starting at $200 billion to make up for past
and continuing wrongs and to help achieve equality in facilities and
infrastructure for communities of the racially and nationally
oppressed;
No taxes for workers and low and middle income people; progressive
taxation of the wealthy and private corporations;
Military budget slashed to a fraction of current spending; and,
All media to be free of monopoly ownership.
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:52:04 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Everyone who knew you before I ran you off, knew it was exactly the
> >> thing you'd do.
>
> >I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
>
> Whacking off wishing someone would take you serious doesn't count,
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Everyone who knew you before I ran you off, knew it was exactly the
> >> thing you'd do.
>
> >I never left, Gary. Why say things that you know are not true?
>
> Kurtie
>
> Maybe that's why your Moscow "subway bride" left you?
Yeah, no doubt. <snickers>
Now, Seaman, if you'd like to keep me from killfiling you again maybe
you
can tell me which of the following political propositions you would
support.
Can you do that or are you too yellow?
Here they are:
The building of a mass peoples party capable of contending for
governmental power, a party free of domination by any monopoly
interests;
Removal from the electoral system of the financial contributions of
monopolies, to be replaced by public funding and guarantees of honest
elections where each vote counts and all votes are counted;
Replacing the foreign policy of preemptive strikes and dictating to
the world in the interests of U.S.-based transnationals with a policy
of international cooperation to solve problems of war and aggression,
poverty, education, environment, health, and development;
Full restoration and expansion of the Bill of Rights and all
democratic rights; the complete separation of church and state;
Full legal protection from hate crimes and racial profiling, and the
outlawing of oral and written racist propaganda;
Implementation of affirmative action and compensatory programs to
achieve actual equality for the racially and nationally oppressed and
women;
Prevention of the freedom of monopolies to move assets in ways that
harm workers and communities without full compensation; the guaranteed
right to a job at living wages or full income through public works and
public service jobs; the growth of public ownership of industries;
Elimination of management prerogatives coupled with the expansion of
workers and union rights to prevent socially harmful management
decisions;
Full funding for education, affordable housing programs, day care,
Social Security, a universal health care program, youth job training
and recreation programs, and cultural programs;
Creation of a social fund starting at $200 billion to make up for past
and continuing wrongs and to help achieve equality in facilities and
infrastructure for communities of the racially and nationally
oppressed;
No taxes for workers and low and middle income people; progressive
taxation of the wealthy and private corporations;
Military budget slashed to a fraction of current spending; and,
All media to be free of monopoly ownership.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Kurt Nicklas
Jul 21, 2012, 6:46:09 AM7/21/12
to
On Jul 20, 6:32 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:45:21 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> Bush
>
> Helms
Poor Gary.
Can't defend his "Stalin was a conservative" foolishness.
Can't defend his love for John Hinkley.
Can't defend his racism that made him tell the yahoo weasels group
that he wouldn't be
voting for Obama.
Poor Gary. Just too witless to think, too illiterate to write, too
humorless to joke and too
yellow to let his posts be archived.
Sorry, Gary. You've become just TOOOO boring.
<re-plonk>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:45:21 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 18, 11:27 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:17:13 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> You've defended every rightwing despot by siding with them,
> >> >> Knickkkers.
>
> >> >Really? Which rightwing despots have I "defended"?
>
> >> Conservative ones.
>
> >You can't name one, can you?
>
> Raygun
> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 18, 11:27 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:17:13 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>
> >> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> You've defended every rightwing despot by siding with them,
> >> >> Knickkkers.
>
> >> >Really? Which rightwing despots have I "defended"?
>
> >> Conservative ones.
>
> >You can't name one, can you?
>
>
> Bush
>
> Helms
Poor Gary.
Can't defend his "Stalin was a conservative" foolishness.
Can't defend his love for John Hinkley.
Can't defend his racism that made him tell the yahoo weasels group
that he wouldn't be
voting for Obama.
Poor Gary. Just too witless to think, too illiterate to write, too
humorless to joke and too
yellow to let his posts be archived.
Sorry, Gary. You've become just TOOOO boring.
<re-plonk>
Message has been deleted
0 new messages