Even Oprah's against Bush's war
Michael Hirtes
the same shit on her that you did with the Dixie Chicks or Rosie. You'll
have more pissed-off housewives kicking your asses than you ever thought
possible.
Oh yeah. The GOP just lost the women's vote BIG TIME. Dubya and the rest
of the whole stinking reich-wing Mafia is toast next election. His
reelection just went up in a noo-kyoo-lur mushroom cloud.
topcat
"Michael Hirtes" <mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com> wrote in message
news:mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net...
Let's see, who's fatter Oprah or Natalie Maines?
TC
Roger Adams
"Michael Hirtes" <mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com> wrote in message
news:mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net...
Oprah is a Saddam-loving traitor.
Roger
--
"As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure"
---Jacques Chirac, President of France
"As far as France is concerned, you're right."
---Rush Limbaugh
B.G.
will silence anyone with the capability to think. Just pray for the
innocent that they can live to see liberation.
"Michael Hirtes" <mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com> wrote in message
news:mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net...
Dana Dare
Ahem. Considering your comment *alone* might I speculate... your head?
All 123lbs. of me is put-off by that sorta baloney remark... sorry!
You don't like their political stance -- attack that -- leave the
"politics of personal destruction" to unthinking dolts... would you?
--
Usenet: a nice place to visit -- but I wouldn't want to live there.
Dana Dare
Dana Dare
Hmmm. What stories, pray tell, are we hearing from the women of
Afghanistan... since they've been liberated and all... have any good
ones to share?
topcat
"Dana Darling:
>
>
> Ahem. Considering your comment *alone* might I speculate... your head?
> All 123lbs. of me is put-off by that sorta baloney remark... sorry!
>
At 123, you obviously are not in the Oprah or Natalie category, Ms. Darling.
You're quite svelte, I'd imagine, unless you're 3 feet tall.
> You don't like their political stance -- attack that -- leave the
> "politics of personal destruction" to unthinking dolts... would you?
>
Okay, I'll apologize, just this once, but can you see how the post sort of
dared me to do it?
TC
Canyon
<mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com> wrote:
>Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a Saddam-loving traitor. Try to pull
>the same shit on her that you did with the Dixie Chicks or Rosie. You'll
>have more pissed-off housewives kicking your asses than you ever thought
>possible.
OH, well if Oprah is even against it.........
ROTFLMAO!
>Oh yeah. The GOP just lost the women's vote BIG TIME. Dubya and the rest
>of the whole stinking reich-wing Mafia is toast next election. His
>reelection just went up in a noo-kyoo-lur mushroom cloud.
You sad little leftists have lost another one....
Give it up, Mhirtsie, before you really hurt yourself.
--
"Yet, 'electromagnetic force' is dwarfed by the electrostatic
forces present in the real universe" --Kurt Lochner
"there are four known forces:
1. Gravity
2. Electromagnetic Force
3. The Strong Force
4. Weak Force "
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980127c.html
Bradley K. Sherman
Or Kuwait, now that it's been liberated for 12 years.
--bks
Cisco Kid
"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message news:b57tf4$6rh$1...@news.monmouth.com...
I can reliably state that Oprah's bank account is MUCH fatter than Natalie's.
ronin
"Dana Dare" <i...@myown.person> wrote in message
news:3E778433...@myown.person...
Ad hominem is the republican way... they attack the person because they
rarely understand the issue.
David L. Moffitt
you.
"Michael Hirtes" <mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com> wrote in message
news:mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net...
: Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a Saddam-loving traitor. Try to pull
ronin
"David L. Moffitt" <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:UDNda.880$446...@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> BFD!!!! The old fat cows opinion doesn't matter to me as much as it does
to
> you.
With an attittude like that, you must get laid, like, never.
Roedy Green
<moff...@prodigy.net> wrote or quoted :
>BFD!!!! The old fat cows opinion doesn't matter to me as much as it does to
>you.
Go look at her site. Oprah looks a lot better than most people her
age. She is not a fat cow. That just proves you respond without even
reading first.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, contract programming for €30 euro per hour or fixed price.
For a overview of George Bush Jr.'s crimes see http://mindprod.com/bush911.html
David L. Moffitt
"Roedy Green" <ro...@mindprod.com> wrote in message
news:nfcf7vgsiv6fh6rc5...@4ax.com...
: On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:06:28 GMT, "David L. Moffitt"
: <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote or quoted :
:
: >BFD!!!! The old fat cows opinion doesn't matter to me as much as it does
to
: >you.
:
: Go look at her site. Oprah looks a lot better than most people her
: age. She is not a fat cow. That just proves you respond without even
: reading first.
%%%% I read it and Oprah has lost enough weight over and over to replace 3
people. Just because she is a celebrity doesn't make her opinion mean any
more than others. She is a fine lady and I personally met her in the 70's
when she was a news person in Nashville where she grew up. She puts her
drawers on the same way I do.
:
: --
: Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
: Coaching, problem solving, contract programming for ?30 euro per hour or
:
Michael Hirtes
"David L. Moffitt" <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote:
> BFD!!!! The old fat cows opinion doesn't matter to me as much as it does to
> you.
Likewise when the GOP had Nell Carter waddling onstage.
Michael Hirtes
"B.G." <mdp...@nospam.bright.net> wrote:
> After all is said and done, I think the stories the women bring out of Iraq
> will silence anyone with the capability to think. Just pray for the
> innocent that they can live to see liberation.
>
Sad to say, but I doubt it. Bagdad has the very big potential to make
Stalingrad look like a picnic.
Michael Hirtes
Liberated? You mean that women are allowed to drive cars and vote there
now?
David L. Moffitt
: In article <UDNda.880$446...@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>,
: "David L. Moffitt" <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote:
:
: > BFD!!!! The old fat cows opinion doesn't matter to me as much as it does
to
: > you.
:
: Likewise when the GOP had Nell Carter waddling onstage.
%%%% Correct. Her opinion doesn't hold any "weight" (snicker since she is
dead) with me either. She like Oprah is just another citizen.
GLC1173
>Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a >Saddam-loving traitor. Try to pull
>the same shit on her that you did with the >Dixie Chicks or Rosie. You'll
>have more pissed-off housewives kicking >your asses than you ever thought
I'll call Oprah what she is - a very-overrated TV personality whose audience
is the only people who can watch TV by the hour during the work day: college
kids, welfare people, retirees. There just aren't many "housewives" anymore to
be watching TV - as most all working-age middle-class women work at that time
of day!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<B>Dissident news - plus immigration, gun rights, nationwide weather
<I><A HREF="http://www.alamanceind.com">ALAMANCE INDEPENDENT:
official newspaper of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy</A></b></i>
Rex the Reaper
>
> TC
>
Poor topcrap. Once again he attacks someone for the way they look.
I've seen pictures of Maines and she is not fat in any way. The only
fat thing here is your head.
Greg
> Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a Saddam-loving traitor. Try to pull
No, I'll settle for calling her a chirpy bimbo instead. And who the
hell cares what Oprah thinks? Soccer moms watch her because there's
nothing else to do after the morning walk, but that doesn't mean they
agree with her.
> the same shit on her that you did with the Dixie Chicks or Rosie. You'll
> have more pissed-off housewives kicking your asses than you ever thought
> possible.
>
> Oh yeah. The GOP just lost the women's vote BIG TIME. Dubya and the rest
> of the whole stinking reich-wing Mafia is toast next election. His
> reelection just went up in a noo-kyoo-lur mushroom cloud.
On the contrary, women are all about security security security for
themselves and their babies. Middle-aged housewives may go to
anti-war rallies because war is just so dirty and icky and nasty, but
in the end, they'll prefer someone who keeps the country safe rather
than someone who puts the country at risk to protect his own political
hide.
Roger Adams
"Rex the Reaper" <natjac...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f3b9ba77.03031...@posting.google.com...
You best get your eyes checked. That is one chubby bitch.
Stupendous Man
That explains a lot.
Stupendous Man—Enemy of Totalitarianism
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 79 > Sec. 1621. Sec. 1621. - Perjury generally
Whoever -
(1)
having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2)
in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States
Note: liberals, after Clinton's perjury, now try to claim that lying about sex doesn't "rise to the level of perjury". This is, of course, false, as demonstrated by the many convictions (under the US code) for statements not directly related to a main charge in a case. Such as Barbara Battalino, Pam Parsons and Diane Parker, all convicted of perjury for lying under oath about having sex.
Judge Lacey Collier (Federal Judge, northern Florida district): Perjury is simply not telling the truth under oath. It really doesn’t matter what the fact is if it’s material to the issue that’s before the court.
Chas. 'Mark' Bee
>
> FBI sources have verified that "Michael Hirtes", in news message
> <mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net>, posted on
> 2003-03-18 2:44 PM apparently from mailto:mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com,
> said:
>
> > Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a Saddam-loving traitor. Try to
> pull
>
> You watch Oprah?
>
> That explains a lot.
Poor repubs, ad hominem is their only friend.
Though speaking strictly for myself - anyone who takes political
commentary from Oprah may have a screw loose and probably should be
ignored until they quit it.
Stupendous Man
> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>
>> FBI sources have verified that "Michael Hirtes", in news message
>> <mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net>, posted on
>> 2003-03-18 2:44 PM apparently from mailto:mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com,
>> said:
>>
>>> Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a Saddam-loving traitor. Try to
>> pull
>>
>> You watch Oprah?
>>
>> That explains a lot.
> Poor repubs, ad hominem is their only friend.
HTH
HAND
Stupendous Man—Enemy of Totalitarianism
implicated either Reagan or Bush" in the Iran-contra scandal. Faced with
only one aspect of the mountainous evidence to the contrary, Stupe
disappeared from the thread forever.--classicliberal2
When asked to prove this allegation, classicliberal2 refused.
I, of course, backed up my position: news:<B9E667CB.B50BA%root@[127.0.0.1]>
David L. Moffitt
"Chas. 'Mark' Bee" <c-b...@uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:3E7A1F3C...@uiuc.edu...
: Stupendous Man wrote:
: >
: > FBI sources have verified that "Michael Hirtes", in news message
: > <mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net>, posted on
: > 2003-03-18 2:44 PM apparently from mailto:mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com,
: > said:
: >
: > > Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a Saddam-loving traitor. Try to
: > pull
: >
: > You watch Oprah?
: >
: > That explains a lot.
:
: Poor repubs, ad hominem is their only friend.
%%%% When it is true it is not ad hominem.
:
: Though speaking strictly for myself - anyone who takes political
: commentary from Oprah may have a screw loose and probably should be
: ignored until they quit it.
%%%% "Though speaking strictly for myself" why was he watching Oprah and
not at work?
adarwinian
<moff...@prodigy.net> wrote:
>
>"Chas. 'Mark' Bee" <c-b...@uiuc.edu> wrote in message
>news:3E7A1F3C...@uiuc.edu...
>: Stupendous Man wrote:
>: >
>: > FBI sources have verified that "Michael Hirtes", in news message
>: > <mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net>, posted on
>: > 2003-03-18 2:44 PM apparently from mailto:mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com,
>: > said:
>: >
>: > > Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a Saddam-loving traitor. Try to
>: > pull
>: >
>: > You watch Oprah?
>: >
>: > That explains a lot.
>:
>: Poor repubs, ad hominem is their only friend.
>
>%%%% When it is true it is not ad hominem.
You need to check the definition. As hominem attack is to attack
one's character rather than address their argument. You know, like
you spend most of your time doing. However, when you do it, it
usually isn't true either so that just make you a fucking liar.
>
>:
>: Though speaking strictly for myself - anyone who takes political
>: commentary from Oprah may have a screw loose and probably should be
>: ignored until they quit it.
>
>%%%% "Though speaking strictly for myself" why was he watching Oprah and
>not at work?
So, everyone who works is working while Oprah is on?
-----
David L. Moffitt in action:
David L. Moffitt
"adarwinian" <adarw...@outgun.com> wrote in message
news:5bc7a53cccc4b1f1...@news.teranews.com...
: On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:37:39 GMT, "David L. Moffitt"
: <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote:
:
: >
: >"Chas. 'Mark' Bee" <c-b...@uiuc.edu> wrote in message
: >news:3E7A1F3C...@uiuc.edu...
: >: Stupendous Man wrote:
: >: >
: >: > FBI sources have verified that "Michael Hirtes", in news message
: >: > <mhirtes-FBFDF6...@news.central.cox.net>, posted on
: >: > 2003-03-18 2:44 PM apparently from mailto:mhi...@SPAMMERS.SUCK.com,
: >: > said:
: >: >
: >: > > Hey repugs! Let's see you call HER a Saddam-loving traitor. Try to
: >: > pull
: >: >
: >: > You watch Oprah?
: >: >
: >: > That explains a lot.
: >:
: >: Poor repubs, ad hominem is their only friend.
: >
: >%%%% When it is true it is not ad hominem.
:
: You need to check the definition. As hominem attack is to attack
: one's character rather than address their argument. You know, like
: you spend most of your time doing. However, when you do it, it
: usually isn't true either so that just make you a fucking liar.
:
: >
: >:
: >: Though speaking strictly for myself - anyone who takes political
: >: commentary from Oprah may have a screw loose and probably should be
: >: ignored until they quit it.
: >
: >%%%% "Though speaking strictly for myself" why was he watching Oprah and
: >not at work?
:
: So, everyone who works is working while Oprah is on?
%%%% Not everyone has a night route of truckstop gloryholes like you do
faggot!!!! :o)
:
:
:
: -----
: David L. Moffitt in action:
:
:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4er35u8j
4si8640vesj8t...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Chas. 'Mark' Bee
...The idiot says, to try to change the subject after being proven a
moron. ;)
adarwinian
<moff...@prodigy.net> wrote:
Yeah, you are as correct about the above as you were about your
definition of "ad hominem."
-----
David L. Moffitt in action: