>> >> >> > >> >>>Just as idiotic liberal judges do...
>> >> >> > >> >> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the
>> >> >> > >> >>Constitution
>> >> >> > >> >>in many cases.
>> >> >> > >> >The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that
>> >> >> > >>there
>> >> >> > >> >are political
>> >> >> > >> >leanings regardless.
>> >> >> > >> >But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will >> >> >> > >> >look
>> >> >> > >> >at
>> >> >> > >> >everything
>> >> >> > >> >from their own political point of view to one degree or
>> >> >> >another.
>> >> >> > >>It
>> >> >> > >> >is simple
>> >> >> > >> >human nature.
>> >> >> > >> >"Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has existed
>> >> >> >as
>> >> >> > >> >long as there
>> >> >> > >> >have been courts of any kind.
>> >> >> > >> >One's politics as well as religion will always affect the way
>> >> >> > >>they
>> >> >> > >> >perceive and
>> >> >> > >> >interpret things. One's concept of good and evil is for the
>> >> >> >most
>> >> >> > >> >part based in
>> >> >> > >> >their politics and religious beliefs. There is no getting
>> >> >> >around
>> >> >> > >> >it.
>> >> >> > >> >Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they
>> >> >> >may
>> >> >> > >> >have written in
>> >> >> > >> >plain English "This is what the constitution means.......". >> >> >> > >> >It
>> >> >> > >>may
>> >> >> > >> >have kept us
>> >> >> > >> >from having a small group of folks "interpreting" the
>> >> >> > >>constitution
>> >> >> > >> >for us.
>> >> >> > >> >Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and
>> >> >> >complaining
>> >> >> > >> >that the SCOTUS
>> >> >> > >> >is nothing but a political arm of this party or that then
>> >> >> >every
>> >> >> > >> >single decision
>> >> >> > >> >that has ever been handed down by the court regarding the
>> >> >> > >> >constitution should be
>> >> >> > >> >thrown out as well as there has always been a majority of
>> >> >> > >> >liberal
>> >> >> > >> >or
>> >> >> > >> >conservative judges in the court.
>> >> >> > >> >The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are now
>> >> >> > >>hearing
>> >> >> > >> >are all
>> >> >> > >> >about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very same
>> >> >> > >>people
>> >> >> > >> >bitching
>> >> >> > >> >about that alleged bias have no problem at all with Obama's
>> >> >> > >> >statement that "when
>> >> >> > >> >he gets re-elected" he'll put two more liberal judges on the
>> >> >> > >>bench
>> >> >> > >> >and make
>> >> >> > >> >everything so much easier for him. That right there says more
>> >> >> > >>about
>> >> >> > >> >how
>> >> >> > >> >liberals and their politicians view the court and how corrupt
>> >> >> > >>they
>> >> >> > >> >would
>> >> >> > >> >actually like it to be as opposed to some existing
>> >> >> >conservative
>> >> >> > >> >bias
>> >> >> > >> >by the
>> >> >> > >> >SCOTUS against a democratic president. They really want the
>> >> >> > >> >court
>> >> >> > >> >to be biased.
>> >> >> > >> >They just don't like it if they think the bias is not in >> >> >> > >> >their
>> >> >> > >> >favor.
>> >> >> > >> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the court.
>> >> >> > >Oh absolutely.
>> >> >> > >Then you can be strip searched by any corporation while it takes
>> >> >> > >money
>> >> >> > >out of
>> >> >> > >your pocket.
>> >> >> > >Legally.
>> >> >> > >Thank you conservatives!
>> >> >> > That is why w need more moderate judges. Left and right are all
>> >> >> > about agenda
>> >> >> Until every non-moderate is out of Congress, we won't have a
>> >> >> moderate
>> >> >> judge. That's simply a given.
>> >> >> > That is also why I oppose the Tea Party they are all about
>> >> >> > corporate power.far left is just as bad as a few here have shown.
>> >> >> > Moderates need to wake up in this election. Congressional races
>> >> >> >are
>> >> >> > also very important kick th radical left and right out.
>> >> >> You may feel Obama is a liberal, I would say he's almost dead >> >> >> middle
>> >> >> of the road. However, from living in a mostly conservative state, I
>> >> >> can say
>> >> >> safely that the Tea Party and its ilk (radical right wingers) have
>> >> >> completely
>> >> >> taken over the grass roots of the Republican party. It is dead.
>> >> >> Democrats
>> >> >> don't vote in blocks for a reason, there are just too many >> >> >> different
>> >> >> types of
>> >> >> them. Nobody will ever take over that party so completely.
>> >> >> If you want Mitt Romney as President, go for it. All I see that way
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> disaster.
>> >> >> Matt
>> >> > At this point Romney is just competing to be the person who loses to
>> >> > President Obama in November. But his followers will have a chance to
>> >> > hold
>> >> > a
>> >> > lot of parties between now and then - that's about the only benefit >> >> > I
>> >> > can
>> >> > think of for his candidacy.
>> >> Explain to me in a hundred words or less why I should continue to make
>> >> the
>> >> effort of clicking on your messages with my index finger.
>> >> I'll expect it on my desk within the hour.
>> >> -Eddie Haskell
>> > Explain to me why the creator of the universe gave humanity five >> > fingers
>> > so
>> > that the one in the middle can be used to salute Republicans. You
>> > pathetic
>> > little snot.
>> You failed to get that on my desk within the hour and you also failed to
>> explain why I should continue to make the effort of clicking on your
>> messages with my index finger.
>> Should your insolence and insubordination continue I'll be forced to take
>> up
>> the matter with the UseNet moderator and see about having your privileges
>> revoked.
>> >> >> >> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the
>> >> >> >> Constitution
>> >> >> >>in many cases.
>> >> >> >The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that there
>> >> >> >are
>> >> >> >political
>> >> >> >leanings regardless.
>> >> >> >But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will look at
>> >> >> >everything
>> >> >> >from their own political point of view to one degree or another.
>> >> >> >It
>> >> >> >is
>> >> >> >simple
>> >> >> >human nature.
>> >> >> >"Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has existed as
>> >> >> >long
>> >> >> >as
>> >> >> >there
>> >> >> >have been courts of any kind.
>> >> >> >One's politics as well as religion will always affect the way they
>> >> >> >perceive and
>> >> >> >interpret things. One's concept of good and evil is for the most
>> >> >> >part
>> >> >> >based in
>> >> >> >their politics and religious beliefs. There is no getting around
>> >> >> >it.
>> >> >> >Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they may
>> >> >> >have
>> >> >> >written in
>> >> >> >plain English "This is what the constitution means.......". It >> >> >> >may
>> >> >> >have
>> >> >> >kept us
>> >> >> >from having a small group of folks "interpreting" the constitution
>> >> >> >for
>> >> >> >us.
>> >> >> >Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and complaining
>> >> >> >that
>> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >SCOTUS
>> >> >> >is nothing but a political arm of this party or that then every
>> >> >> >single
>> >> >> >decision
>> >> >> >that has ever been handed down by the court regarding the
>> >> >> >constitution
>> >> >> >should be
>> >> >> >thrown out as well as there has always been a majority of liberal
>> >> >> >or
>> >> >> >conservative judges in the court.
>> >> >> >The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are now >> >> >> >hearing
>> >> >> >are
>> >> >> >all
>> >> >> >about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very same people
>> >> >> >bitching
>> >> >> >about that alleged bias have no problem at all with Obama's
>> >> >> >statement
>> >> >> >that "when
>> >> >> >he gets re-elected" he'll put two more liberal judges on the bench
>> >> >> >and
>> >> >> >make
>> >> >> >everything so much easier for him. That right there says more
>> >> >> >about
>> >> >> >how
>> >> >> >liberals and their politicians view the court and how corrupt they
>> >> >> >would
>> >> >> >actually like it to be as opposed to some existing conservative
>> >> >> >bias
>> >> >> >by
>> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >SCOTUS against a democratic president. They really want the court
>> >> >> >to
>> >> >> >be
>> >> >> >biased.
>> >> >> >They just don't like it if they think the bias is not in their
>> >> >> >favor.
>> >> >> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the court.
>> >> > You are right. We need all of them to be liberal.
>> >> Why do you hate the rule of law and the constitution? The only people
>> >> that
>> >> are going to uphold that and prevent the rule of men are >> >> conservatives.
>> >> Liberals aren't even Americans and nether are you.
>> >> Goddamn America.
>> >> -Eddie Haskell
>> > I've been a citizen of the United States my entire life. You are not
>> > since
>> > you are Canadian.
>> You ceased to be an American the day you threw in with the democrat party
>> to
>> become a traitor and anti-American.
>> Goddamn America.
>> -Eddie Haskell
> I'm a citizen in good standing.
Over at the DNC.
> I pay my taxes.
After being indicted for tax evasion.
> I don't commit crimes.
Except the ones you commit against humanity here almost daily.
> My
> driver's license has never been suspended.
That's because it was permanently revoked.
> I've never been tossed out of a
> bar for drunkenness.
>>>>> >> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the >>>>> >> Constitution
>>>>> >>in many cases.
>>>>> >The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that there >>>>> >are
>>>>> >political
>>>>> >leanings regardless.
>>>>> >But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will look at
>>>>> >everything
>>>>> >from their own political point of view to one degree or another. It >>>>> >is
>>>>> >simple
>>>>> >human nature.
>>>>> >"Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has existed as long
>>>>> >as there
>>>>> >have been courts of any kind.
>>>>> >One's politics as well as religion will always affect the way they
>>>>> >perceive and
>>>>> >interpret things. One's concept of good and evil is for the most part
>>>>> >based in
>>>>> >their politics and religious beliefs. There is no getting around it.
>>>>> >Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they may have
>>>>> >written in
>>>>> >plain English "This is what the constitution means.......". It may >>>>> >have
>>>>> >kept us
>>>>> >from having a small group of folks "interpreting" the constitution >>>>> >for
>>>>> >us.
>>>>> >Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and complaining that
>>>>> >the SCOTUS
>>>>> >is nothing but a political arm of this party or that then every >>>>> >single
>>>>> >decision
>>>>> >that has ever been handed down by the court regarding the >>>>> >constitution
>>>>> >should be
>>>>> >thrown out as well as there has always been a majority of liberal or
>>>>> >conservative judges in the court.
>>>>> >The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are now hearing >>>>> >are
>>>>> >all
>>>>> >about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very same people
>>>>> >bitching
>>>>> >about that alleged bias have no problem at all with Obama's statement
>>>>> >that "when
>>>>> >he gets re-elected" he'll put two more liberal judges on the bench >>>>> >and
>>>>> >make
>>>>> >everything so much easier for him. That right there says more about >>>>> >how
>>>>> >liberals and their politicians view the court and how corrupt they
>>>>> >would
>>>>> >actually like it to be as opposed to some existing conservative bias >>>>> >by
>>>>> >the
>>>>> >SCOTUS against a democratic president. They really want the court to >>>>> >be
>>>>> >biased.
>>>>> >They just don't like it if they think the bias is not in their favor.
>>>>> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the court.
>>>>Oh absolutely.
>>>>Then you can be strip searched by any corporation while it takes money
>>>>out of
>>>>your pocket.
>>>>Legally.
>>>>Thank you conservatives!
>>> That is why w need more moderate judges. Left and right are all
>>> about agenda
>>> That is also why I oppose the Tea Party they are all about
>>> corporate power.
>>You're a fucking idiot.
> Maybe but them again another Tea Party member introduced another
> SOPA. Did change the name to CISPA.
> Tell me again they don't serve the corporate masters.
>>>>>>>>>On 4/10/2012 10:13 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> idiotic conservative judge keep trying to
>>>>>>>>>> supercede existing laws
>>>>>>>>>Just as idiotic liberal judges do...
>>>>>>>> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the >>>>>>>> Constitution
>>>>>>>>in many cases.
>>>>>>> The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that there >>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> political
>>>>>>> leanings regardless.
>>>>>>> But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will look at
>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>> from their own political point of view to one degree or another. It
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> simple
>>>>>>> human nature.
>>>>>>> "Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has existed as >>>>>>> long
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> have been courts of any kind.
>>>>>>> One's politics as well as religion will always affect the way they
>>>>>>> perceive and
>>>>>>> interpret things. One's concept of good and evil is for the most >>>>>>> part
>>>>>>> based in
>>>>>>> their politics and religious beliefs. There is no getting around >>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>> Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they may >>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> written in
>>>>>>> plain English "This is what the constitution means.......". It may
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> kept us
>>>>>>> from having a small group of folks "interpreting" the constitution >>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> us.
>>>>>>They did write it in plain English. It's just that the left likes to
>>>>>>pretend
>>>>>>that it's obscure and endlessly complicated so we need them to tell us
>>>>>>what
>>>>>>it means. That's why they made Husseincare so huge and complex. It's >>>>>>so
>>>>>>no
>>>>>>one will understand it and they can make up shit as they go.
>>>>>>-Eddie Haskell
>>>>> Eddie can you sh\ow us the part that gives Corporations power over
>>>>> government and calls them a "Person"
>>>>Who said corporations have power over government?
>>> Oh they have power. Another SOPA was introduced by the Tea Party
>>> again changed the name to CISPA. We can see who the Tea Party works
>>> for. Economy going to hell and they do nothings. Yet Corporations
>>> call and they jump. So glad the Tea party is going down in flames.
>>> Hopefully Mike Rogers will be kicked out.
>>> It isn't as bad as SOPA but is vague. To broad in scope.
>>You're fucking ridiculous. The tea party was a ground swell that came up
>>from people who were horrified by Hussein's insane spending and >>Husseincare.
>>That's all there is to it, you lunatic.
> What has that to do with SOPA and CISPA?
>>You make your shit up so you can ride the fence and seem above the fray >>but
>>it doesn't make you look smart, it makes you like a like a coward.
> No fear of your type. You hide and cry.
> Here are some facts
> SOPA introduces by Tea Party Member Representative Lamar S. Smith.
> CISPA introduced by Tea Party Member Representative Michael Rogers
> Both need to be replaced with less corrupt members ASAP.
> For your information the Tea party was a bad idea that time came and
> went. They are now little more than a joke. The Moderates
> Republicans took the Republican party back. Well you still have
> Gingrich ROFL.
Took it back alright. Just like Ford, Dole and McCain.
>>> >> >> >>>>>>Just as idiotic liberal judges do...
>>> >> >> >>>>> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the
>>> >> >> >>>>> Constitution
>>> >> >> >>>>>in many cases.
>>> >> >> >>>>The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that
>>> >> >> >there
>>> >> >> >>>>are
>>> >> >> >>>>political leanings regardless.
>>> >> >> >>>>But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will
>>> >> >> >>>>look
>>> >> >> >at
>>> >> >> >>>>everything from their own political point of view to one
>>> >> >> >>>>degree
>>> >> >> >or
>>> >> >> >>>>another. It is simple human nature.
>>> >> >> >>>>"Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has
>>> >> >> >>>>existed as long
>>> >> >> >>>>as there have been courts of any kind. One's politics as
>>> >> >> >>>>well as religion will always affect the way
>>> >> >> >they
>>> >> >> >>>>perceive and interpret things. One's concept of good and
>>> >> >> >>>>evil
>>> >> >> >is
>>> >> >> >>>>for
>>> >> >> >>>>the most part based in their politics and religious beliefs.
>>> >> >> >There
>>> >> >> >>>>is
>>> >> >> >>>>no getting around it.
>>> >> >> >>>>Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they
>>> >> >> >>>>may have
>>> >> >> >>>>written in plain English "This is what the constitution
>>> >> >> >>>>means.......".
>>> >> >> >>>>It may have kept us from having a small group of folks
>>> >> >> >>>>"interpreting"
>>> >> >> >>>>the constitution for us.
>>> >> >> >>>>Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and
>>> >> >> >>>>complaining that
>>> >> >> >>>>the SCOTUS is nothing but a political arm of this party or
>>> >> >> >>>>that then
>>> >> >> >>>>every single decision that has ever been handed down by the
>>> >> >> >court
>>> >> >> >>>>regarding the constitution should be thrown out as well as
>>> >> >> >>>>there has
>>> >> >> >>>>always been a majority of liberal or conservative judges in
>>> >> >> >>>>the court.
>>> >> >> >>>>The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are now
>>> >> >> >hearing
>>> >> >> >>>>are
>>> >> >> >>>>all about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very
>>> >> >> >>>>same people
>>> >> >> >>>>bitching about that alleged bias have no problem at all with
>>> >> >> >>>>Obama's
>>> >> >> >>>>statement that "when he gets re-elected" he'll put two more
>>> >> >> >liberal
>>> >> >> >>>>judges on the bench and make everything so much easier for
>>> >> >> >>>>him. That
>>> >> >> >>>>right there says more about how liberals and their
>>> >> >> >>>>politicians
>>> >> >> >view
>>> >> >> >>>>the
>>> >> >> >>>>court and how corrupt they would actually like it to be as
>>> >> >> >opposed
>>> >> >> >>>>to
>>> >> >> >>>>some existing conservative bias by the SCOTUS against a
>>> >> >> >democratic
>>> >> >> >>>>president. They really want the court to be biased. They
>>> >> >> >>>>just don't
>>> >> >> >>>>like it if they think the bias is not in their favor.
>>> >> >> >>> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the
>>> >> >> >>> court.
>>> >> >> >> You mean you don't want to sit around toking on medical
>>> >> >> >marijuana,
>>> >> >> >> collecting a government check, getting free government
>>> >> >> >> healthcare while
>>> >> >> >> living in a free government house that's all been paid for by
>>> >> >> >> the much
>>> >> >> >> deserved 99% taxation on the evil bastards that dare make
>>> >> >> >> more
>>> >> >> >than
>>> >> >> >> a
>>> >> >> >> liveable wage? Off to the re-education camp with you.
>>> >> >> > Why are all American right wingers such whiny and dishonest
>>> >> >> > cunts?
>>> >> >> Why are all democrats projecting liars?
>>> >> >> -Eddie Haskell
>>> >> >Why are you a pathetic little snot?
>>> >> >Democrats are not liars. We have stated that President Obama will
>>> >> >be re-elected in November. That is not a lie. It is the truth. We
>>> >> >know it now.
>>> >> >You will know it later.
>>> >> The only way you can know it now is if it is fixed. Is that the
>>> >> plan????
>>> >> Future is not fixed. Both Romney and Obama might make a mistake.
>>> >> Romney's VP choice will be a major factor.
>>> >I realize that common people see things that way. That doesn't mean
>>> >that everyone falls into that fallacy. There are things that can be
>>> >known about
>>> >the future and it has nothing to do with predictions, prophecies,
>>> >fortune telling or any of that type of hokum. Once you learn that
>>> >time itself is a
>>> >complete illusion, you can then open your mind to knowing things that
>>> >are not limited by temporal sequencing.
>>> >President Obama will be re-elected in November.
>>> OK Do you know next weeks lotto numbers?
>>Here's the fallacy of that. If I gave them to you all you'd do is go out
>>and buy a ticket so you'd become rich. It wouldn't benefit anyone but
>>you. On the other hand, President Obama's re-election will benefit
>>everyone except a few disgruntled people who just plain like to be
>>unhappy so that they have something to complain about. So no, I won't
>>give you the lottery numbers - you've done nothing at all to deserve
>>them, nothing good would come from it and you wouldn't use the outcome
>>to make this world a better place to live in.
> Well that is your opinion. That is good.
> Mine is I can't trust a man that sold guns to Drug Lords to promote
> his wish for Gun Control. That wants to make the SC liberal not
> balanced but liberal. Sorry don't want that man.
> Romney is far from a perfect choice, but better than Obama.
What's Romney's stand on health care this week?
-- “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable” -JFK
-- “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable” -JFK
>>>>>>>>>>On 4/10/2012 10:13 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> idiotic conservative judge keep trying to
>>>>>>>>>>> supercede existing laws
>>>>>>>>>>Just as idiotic liberal judges do...
>>>>>>>>> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the >>>>>>>>> Constitution
>>>>>>>>>in many cases.
>>>>>>>> The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that there >>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> political
>>>>>>>> leanings regardless.
>>>>>>>> But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will look at
>>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>>> from their own political point of view to one degree or another. It
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> simple
>>>>>>>> human nature.
>>>>>>>> "Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has existed as >>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>> have been courts of any kind.
>>>>>>>> One's politics as well as religion will always affect the way they
>>>>>>>> perceive and
>>>>>>>> interpret things. One's concept of good and evil is for the most >>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>> based in
>>>>>>>> their politics and religious beliefs. There is no getting around >>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they may >>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> written in
>>>>>>>> plain English "This is what the constitution means.......". It may
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> kept us
>>>>>>>> from having a small group of folks "interpreting" the constitution >>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> us.
>>>>>>>They did write it in plain English. It's just that the left likes to
>>>>>>>pretend
>>>>>>>that it's obscure and endlessly complicated so we need them to tell us
>>>>>>>what
>>>>>>>it means. That's why they made Husseincare so huge and complex. It's >>>>>>>so
>>>>>>>no
>>>>>>>one will understand it and they can make up shit as they go.
>>>>>>>-Eddie Haskell
>>>>>> Eddie can you sh\ow us the part that gives Corporations power over
>>>>>> government and calls them a "Person"
>>>>>Who said corporations have power over government?
>>>> Oh they have power. Another SOPA was introduced by the Tea Party
>>>> again changed the name to CISPA. We can see who the Tea Party works
>>>> for. Economy going to hell and they do nothings. Yet Corporations
>>>> call and they jump. So glad the Tea party is going down in flames.
>>>> Hopefully Mike Rogers will be kicked out.
>>>> It isn't as bad as SOPA but is vague. To broad in scope.
>>>You're fucking ridiculous. The tea party was a ground swell that came up
>>>from people who were horrified by Hussein's insane spending and >>>Husseincare.
>>>That's all there is to it, you lunatic.
>> What has that to do with SOPA and CISPA?
>>>You make your shit up so you can ride the fence and seem above the fray >>>but
>>>it doesn't make you look smart, it makes you like a like a coward.
>> No fear of your type. You hide and cry.
>> Here are some facts
>> SOPA introduces by Tea Party Member Representative Lamar S. Smith.
>> CISPA introduced by Tea Party Member Representative Michael Rogers
>> Both need to be replaced with less corrupt members ASAP.
>> For your information the Tea party was a bad idea that time came and
>> went. They are now little more than a joke. The Moderates
>> Republicans took the Republican party back. Well you still have
>> Gingrich ROFL.
>Took it back alright. Just like Ford, Dole and McCain.
>>>>>> >> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the >>>>>> >> Constitution
>>>>>> >>in many cases.
>>>>>> >The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that there >>>>>> >are
>>>>>> >political
>>>>>> >leanings regardless.
>>>>>> >But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will look at
>>>>>> >everything
>>>>>> >from their own political point of view to one degree or another. It >>>>>> >is
>>>>>> >simple
>>>>>> >human nature.
>>>>>> >"Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has existed as long
>>>>>> >as there
>>>>>> >have been courts of any kind.
>>>>>> >One's politics as well as religion will always affect the way they
>>>>>> >perceive and
>>>>>> >interpret things. One's concept of good and evil is for the most part
>>>>>> >based in
>>>>>> >their politics and religious beliefs. There is no getting around it.
>>>>>> >Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they may have
>>>>>> >written in
>>>>>> >plain English "This is what the constitution means.......". It may >>>>>> >have
>>>>>> >kept us
>>>>>> >from having a small group of folks "interpreting" the constitution >>>>>> >for
>>>>>> >us.
>>>>>> >Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and complaining that
>>>>>> >the SCOTUS
>>>>>> >is nothing but a political arm of this party or that then every >>>>>> >single
>>>>>> >decision
>>>>>> >that has ever been handed down by the court regarding the >>>>>> >constitution
>>>>>> >should be
>>>>>> >thrown out as well as there has always been a majority of liberal or
>>>>>> >conservative judges in the court.
>>>>>> >The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are now hearing >>>>>> >are
>>>>>> >all
>>>>>> >about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very same people
>>>>>> >bitching
>>>>>> >about that alleged bias have no problem at all with Obama's statement
>>>>>> >that "when
>>>>>> >he gets re-elected" he'll put two more liberal judges on the bench >>>>>> >and
>>>>>> >make
>>>>>> >everything so much easier for him. That right there says more about >>>>>> >how
>>>>>> >liberals and their politicians view the court and how corrupt they
>>>>>> >would
>>>>>> >actually like it to be as opposed to some existing conservative bias >>>>>> >by
>>>>>> >the
>>>>>> >SCOTUS against a democratic president. They really want the court to >>>>>> >be
>>>>>> >biased.
>>>>>> >They just don't like it if they think the bias is not in their favor.
>>>>>> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the court.
>>>>>Oh absolutely.
>>>>>Then you can be strip searched by any corporation while it takes money
>>>>>out of
>>>>>your pocket.
>>>>>Legally.
>>>>>Thank you conservatives!
>>>> That is why w need more moderate judges. Left and right are all
>>>> about agenda
>>>> That is also why I oppose the Tea Party they are all about
>>>> corporate power.
>>>You're a fucking idiot.
>> Maybe but them again another Tea Party member introduced another
>> SOPA. Did change the name to CISPA.
>> Tell me again they don't serve the corporate masters.
>I'll tell you that you're a fucking idiot.
Tea Party operatives hate truth. They remind me of Zepp in so many
ways.
>>>> >> >> >>>>>>Just as idiotic liberal judges do...
>>>> >> >> >>>>> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the
>>>> >> >> >>>>> Constitution
>>>> >> >> >>>>>in many cases.
>>>> >> >> >>>>The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that
>>>> >> >> >there
>>>> >> >> >>>>are
>>>> >> >> >>>>political leanings regardless.
>>>> >> >> >>>>But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will
>>>> >> >> >>>>look
>>>> >> >> >at
>>>> >> >> >>>>everything from their own political point of view to one
>>>> >> >> >>>>degree
>>>> >> >> >or
>>>> >> >> >>>>another. It is simple human nature.
>>>> >> >> >>>>"Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has
>>>> >> >> >>>>existed as long
>>>> >> >> >>>>as there have been courts of any kind. One's politics as
>>>> >> >> >>>>well as religion will always affect the way
>>>> >> >> >they
>>>> >> >> >>>>perceive and interpret things. One's concept of good and
>>>> >> >> >>>>evil
>>>> >> >> >is
>>>> >> >> >>>>for
>>>> >> >> >>>>the most part based in their politics and religious beliefs.
>>>> >> >> >There
>>>> >> >> >>>>is
>>>> >> >> >>>>no getting around it.
>>>> >> >> >>>>Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they
>>>> >> >> >>>>may have
>>>> >> >> >>>>written in plain English "This is what the constitution
>>>> >> >> >>>>means.......".
>>>> >> >> >>>>It may have kept us from having a small group of folks
>>>> >> >> >>>>"interpreting"
>>>> >> >> >>>>the constitution for us.
>>>> >> >> >>>>Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and
>>>> >> >> >>>>complaining that
>>>> >> >> >>>>the SCOTUS is nothing but a political arm of this party or
>>>> >> >> >>>>that then
>>>> >> >> >>>>every single decision that has ever been handed down by the
>>>> >> >> >court
>>>> >> >> >>>>regarding the constitution should be thrown out as well as
>>>> >> >> >>>>there has
>>>> >> >> >>>>always been a majority of liberal or conservative judges in
>>>> >> >> >>>>the court.
>>>> >> >> >>>>The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are now
>>>> >> >> >hearing
>>>> >> >> >>>>are
>>>> >> >> >>>>all about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very
>>>> >> >> >>>>same people
>>>> >> >> >>>>bitching about that alleged bias have no problem at all with
>>>> >> >> >>>>Obama's
>>>> >> >> >>>>statement that "when he gets re-elected" he'll put two more
>>>> >> >> >liberal
>>>> >> >> >>>>judges on the bench and make everything so much easier for
>>>> >> >> >>>>him. That
>>>> >> >> >>>>right there says more about how liberals and their
>>>> >> >> >>>>politicians
>>>> >> >> >view
>>>> >> >> >>>>the
>>>> >> >> >>>>court and how corrupt they would actually like it to be as
>>>> >> >> >opposed
>>>> >> >> >>>>to
>>>> >> >> >>>>some existing conservative bias by the SCOTUS against a
>>>> >> >> >democratic
>>>> >> >> >>>>president. They really want the court to be biased. They
>>>> >> >> >>>>just don't
>>>> >> >> >>>>like it if they think the bias is not in their favor.
>>>> >> >> >>> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the
>>>> >> >> >>> court.
>>>> >> >> >> You mean you don't want to sit around toking on medical
>>>> >> >> >marijuana,
>>>> >> >> >> collecting a government check, getting free government
>>>> >> >> >> healthcare while
>>>> >> >> >> living in a free government house that's all been paid for by
>>>> >> >> >> the much
>>>> >> >> >> deserved 99% taxation on the evil bastards that dare make
>>>> >> >> >> more
>>>> >> >> >than
>>>> >> >> >> a
>>>> >> >> >> liveable wage? Off to the re-education camp with you.
>>>> >> >> > Why are all American right wingers such whiny and dishonest
>>>> >> >> > cunts?
>>>> >> >> Why are all democrats projecting liars?
>>>> >> >> -Eddie Haskell
>>>> >> >Why are you a pathetic little snot?
>>>> >> >Democrats are not liars. We have stated that President Obama will
>>>> >> >be re-elected in November. That is not a lie. It is the truth. We
>>>> >> >know it now.
>>>> >> >You will know it later.
>>>> >> The only way you can know it now is if it is fixed. Is that the
>>>> >> plan????
>>>> >> Future is not fixed. Both Romney and Obama might make a mistake.
>>>> >> Romney's VP choice will be a major factor.
>>>> >I realize that common people see things that way. That doesn't mean
>>>> >that everyone falls into that fallacy. There are things that can be
>>>> >known about
>>>> >the future and it has nothing to do with predictions, prophecies,
>>>> >fortune telling or any of that type of hokum. Once you learn that
>>>> >time itself is a
>>>> >complete illusion, you can then open your mind to knowing things that
>>>> >are not limited by temporal sequencing.
>>>> >President Obama will be re-elected in November.
>>>> OK Do you know next weeks lotto numbers?
>>>Here's the fallacy of that. If I gave them to you all you'd do is go out
>>>and buy a ticket so you'd become rich. It wouldn't benefit anyone but
>>>you. On the other hand, President Obama's re-election will benefit
>>>everyone except a few disgruntled people who just plain like to be
>>>unhappy so that they have something to complain about. So no, I won't
>>>give you the lottery numbers - you've done nothing at all to deserve
>>>them, nothing good would come from it and you wouldn't use the outcome
>>>to make this world a better place to live in.
>> Well that is your opinion. That is good.
>> Mine is I can't trust a man that sold guns to Drug Lords to promote
>> his wish for Gun Control. That wants to make the SC liberal not
>> balanced but liberal. Sorry don't want that man.
>> Romney is far from a perfect choice, but better than Obama.
>What's Romney's stand on health care this week?
Don't know don't care. Surely you have better rhetoric. Thanks
for proving you couldn't counter the facts about Obama.
>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>Just as idiotic liberal judges do...
>>>>> >> >> >>>>> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the
>>>>> >> >> >>>>> Constitution
>>>>> >> >> >>>>>in many cases.
>>>>> >> >> >>>>The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies
>>>>> >> >> >>>>that
>>>>> >> >> >there
>>>>> >> >> >>>>are
>>>>> >> >> >>>>political leanings regardless.
>>>>> >> >> >>>>But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will
>>>>> >> >> >>>>look
>>>>> >> >> >at
>>>>> >> >> >>>>everything from their own political point of view to one
>>>>> >> >> >>>>degree
>>>>> >> >> >or
>>>>> >> >> >>>>another. It is simple human nature.
>>>>> >> >> >>>>"Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has
>>>>> >> >> >>>>existed as long
>>>>> >> >> >>>>as there have been courts of any kind. One's politics as
>>>>> >> >> >>>>well as religion will always affect the way
>>>>> >> >> >they
>>>>> >> >> >>>>perceive and interpret things. One's concept of good and
>>>>> >> >> >>>>evil
>>>>> >> >> >is
>>>>> >> >> >>>>for
>>>>> >> >> >>>>the most part based in their politics and religious
>>>>> >> >> >>>>beliefs.
>>>>> >> >> >There
>>>>> >> >> >>>>is
>>>>> >> >> >>>>no getting around it.
>>>>> >> >> >>>>Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or
>>>>> >> >> >>>>they may have
>>>>> >> >> >>>>written in plain English "This is what the constitution
>>>>> >> >> >>>>means.......".
>>>>> >> >> >>>>It may have kept us from having a small group of folks
>>>>> >> >> >>>>"interpreting"
>>>>> >> >> >>>>the constitution for us.
>>>>> >> >> >>>>Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and
>>>>> >> >> >>>>complaining that
>>>>> >> >> >>>>the SCOTUS is nothing but a political arm of this party or
>>>>> >> >> >>>>that then
>>>>> >> >> >>>>every single decision that has ever been handed down by
>>>>> >> >> >>>>the
>>>>> >> >> >court
>>>>> >> >> >>>>regarding the constitution should be thrown out as well as
>>>>> >> >> >>>>there has
>>>>> >> >> >>>>always been a majority of liberal or conservative judges
>>>>> >> >> >>>>in the court.
>>>>> >> >> >>>>The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are
>>>>> >> >> >>>>now
>>>>> >> >> >hearing
>>>>> >> >> >>>>are
>>>>> >> >> >>>>all about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very
>>>>> >> >> >>>>same people
>>>>> >> >> >>>>bitching about that alleged bias have no problem at all
>>>>> >> >> >>>>with Obama's
>>>>> >> >> >>>>statement that "when he gets re-elected" he'll put two
>>>>> >> >> >>>>more
>>>>> >> >> >liberal
>>>>> >> >> >>>>judges on the bench and make everything so much easier for
>>>>> >> >> >>>>him. That
>>>>> >> >> >>>>right there says more about how liberals and their
>>>>> >> >> >>>>politicians
>>>>> >> >> >view
>>>>> >> >> >>>>the
>>>>> >> >> >>>>court and how corrupt they would actually like it to be as
>>>>> >> >> >opposed
>>>>> >> >> >>>>to
>>>>> >> >> >>>>some existing conservative bias by the SCOTUS against a
>>>>> >> >> >democratic
>>>>> >> >> >>>>president. They really want the court to be biased. They
>>>>> >> >> >>>>just don't
>>>>> >> >> >>>>like it if they think the bias is not in their favor.
>>>>> >> >> >>> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the
>>>>> >> >> >>> court.
>>>>> >> >> >> You mean you don't want to sit around toking on medical
>>>>> >> >> >marijuana,
>>>>> >> >> >> collecting a government check, getting free government
>>>>> >> >> >> healthcare while
>>>>> >> >> >> living in a free government house that's all been paid for
>>>>> >> >> >> by the much
>>>>> >> >> >> deserved 99% taxation on the evil bastards that dare make
>>>>> >> >> >> more
>>>>> >> >> >than
>>>>> >> >> >> a
>>>>> >> >> >> liveable wage? Off to the re-education camp with you.
>>>>> >> >> > Why are all American right wingers such whiny and dishonest
>>>>> >> >> > cunts?
>>>>> >> >> Why are all democrats projecting liars?
>>>>> >> >> -Eddie Haskell
>>>>> >> >Why are you a pathetic little snot?
>>>>> >> >Democrats are not liars. We have stated that President Obama
>>>>> >> >will be re-elected in November. That is not a lie. It is the
>>>>> >> >truth. We know it now.
>>>>> >> >You will know it later.
>>>>> >> The only way you can know it now is if it is fixed. Is that
>>>>> >> the
>>>>> >> plan????
>>>>> >> Future is not fixed. Both Romney and Obama might make a
>>>>> >> mistake.
>>>>> >> Romney's VP choice will be a major factor.
>>>>> >I realize that common people see things that way. That doesn't mean
>>>>> >that everyone falls into that fallacy. There are things that can be
>>>>> >known about
>>>>> >the future and it has nothing to do with predictions, prophecies,
>>>>> >fortune telling or any of that type of hokum. Once you learn that
>>>>> >time itself is a
>>>>> >complete illusion, you can then open your mind to knowing things
>>>>> >that are not limited by temporal sequencing.
>>>>> >President Obama will be re-elected in November.
>>>>> OK Do you know next weeks lotto numbers?
>>>>Here's the fallacy of that. If I gave them to you all you'd do is go
>>>>out and buy a ticket so you'd become rich. It wouldn't benefit anyone
>>>>but you. On the other hand, President Obama's re-election will benefit
>>>>everyone except a few disgruntled people who just plain like to be
>>>>unhappy so that they have something to complain about. So no, I won't
>>>>give you the lottery numbers - you've done nothing at all to deserve
>>>>them, nothing good would come from it and you wouldn't use the outcome
>>>>to make this world a better place to live in.
>>> Well that is your opinion. That is good.
>>> Mine is I can't trust a man that sold guns to Drug Lords to promote
>>> his wish for Gun Control. That wants to make the SC liberal not
>>> balanced but liberal. Sorry don't want that man.
>>> Romney is far from a perfect choice, but better than Obama.
>>What's Romney's stand on health care this week?
> Don't know don't care. Surely you have better rhetoric. Thanks
> for proving you couldn't counter the facts about Obama.
Oh, the gun running thing? Just more right wing bullshit. Obama continued another Bush failed policy, and you're trying to pretend it was all Obama's idea.
You know the GOP is fucked when you start trying their most cherished ideas to the Democrats. Such as Romneycare.
-- “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable” -JFK
-- “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable” -JFK
>>>>>>>> On 4/10/2012 10:13 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
>>>>>>>>> idiotic conservative judge keep trying to
>>>>>>>>> supercede existing laws
>>>>>>>> Just as idiotic liberal judges do...
>>>>>>> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the
>>>>>>> Constitution
>>>>>>> in many cases.
>>>>>> The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that there
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> political
>>>>>> leanings regardless.
>>>>>> But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will look at
>>>>>> everything
>>>>> >from their own political point of view to one degree or another. It
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> simple
>>>>>> human nature.
>>>>>> "Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has existed as long
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> have been courts of any kind.
>>>>>> One's politics as well as religion will always affect the way they
>>>>>> perceive and
>>>>>> interpret things. One's concept of good and evil is for the most part
>>>>>> based in
>>>>>> their politics and religious beliefs. There is no getting around it.
>>>>>> Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they may have
>>>>>> written in
>>>>>> plain English "This is what the constitution means.......". It may
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> kept us
>>>>> >from having a small group of folks "interpreting" the constitution
>>>>> for
>>>>>> us.
>>>>>> Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and complaining that
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> SCOTUS
>>>>>> is nothing but a political arm of this party or that then every
>>>>>> single
>>>>>> decision
>>>>>> that has ever been handed down by the court regarding the
>>>>>> constitution
>>>>>> should be
>>>>>> thrown out as well as there has always been a majority of liberal or
>>>>>> conservative judges in the court.
>>>>>> The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are now hearing
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very same people
>>>>>> bitching
>>>>>> about that alleged bias have no problem at all with Obama's statement
>>>>>> that "when
>>>>>> he gets re-elected" he'll put two more liberal judges on the bench
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> make
>>>>>> everything so much easier for him. That right there says more about
>>>>>> how
>>>>>> liberals and their politicians view the court and how corrupt they
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> actually like it to be as opposed to some existing conservative bias
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> SCOTUS against a democratic president. They really want the court to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> biased.
>>>>>> They just don't like it if they think the bias is not in their favor.
>>>>> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the court.
>>>> You are right. We need all of them to be liberal.
>>> Why do you hate the rule of law and the constitution? The only people
>>> that
>>> are going to uphold that and prevent the rule of men are conservatives.
>>> Liberals aren't even Americans and nether are you.
>>> Goddamn America.
>>> -Eddie Haskell
>> I've been a citizen of the United States my entire life. You are not
>> since
>> you are Canadian.
> On 4/12/2012 4:55 AM, China Blue Water Navy wrote:
>> In article<upWdnZI7ybq5KRvSnZ2dnUVZ_qCdn...@giganews.com>,
>> linuxgal<linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Are you seriously trying to equate social Darwinism to "biological
>>>>>> Darwinism"?
>>>>> Every system with patterns that propagate through time (DNA, political
>>>>> positions) is subject to Darwinism.
>>>> You forget that obstruction and deliberate adverse human nature alters
>>>> how a social system works.
>>> There are predators in the jungle too.
>> Not for humans. Few animals prey on adult humans.
>> >> >> >> >>>Just as idiotic liberal judges do...
>> >> >> >> >> Yes both sides on the court IMO put politics before the
>> >> >> >> >> Constitution
>> >> >> >> >>in many cases.
>> >> >> >> >The fact that you say "both sides of the court" implies that
>> >> >> >there
>> >> >> >> >are
>> >> >> >> >political
>> >> >> >> >leanings regardless.
>> >> >> >> >But the plain reality of the matter is that EVERYONE will look
>> >> >> >at
>> >> >> >> >everything
>> >> >> >> >from their own political point of view to one degree or >> >> >> >> >another.
>> >> >> >> >It
>> >> >> >> >is
>> >> >> >> >simple
>> >> >> >> >human nature.
>> >> >> >> >"Don't piss off the judge" has been a saying that has existed >> >> >> >> >as
>> >> >> >> >long
>> >> >> >> >as
>> >> >> >> >there
>> >> >> >> >have been courts of any kind.
>> >> >> >> >One's politics as well as religion will always affect the way
>> >> >> >they
>> >> >> >> >perceive and
>> >> >> >> >interpret things. One's concept of good and evil is for the
>> >> >> >most
>> >> >> >> >part
>> >> >> >> >based in
>> >> >> >> >their politics and religious beliefs. There is no getting
>> >> >> >around
>> >> >> >> >it.
>> >> >> >> >Too bad that the founders didn't have a crystal ball or they >> >> >> >> >may
>> >> >> >> >have
>> >> >> >> >written in
>> >> >> >> >plain English "This is what the constitution means.......". It
>> >> >> >> >may
>> >> >> >> >have
>> >> >> >> >kept us
>> >> >> >> >from having a small group of folks "interpreting" the
>> >> >> >constitution
>> >> >> >> >for
>> >> >> >> >us.
>> >> >> >> >Lastly, if folks want to just now start whinning and >> >> >> >> >complaining
>> >> >> >> >that
>> >> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >> >SCOTUS
>> >> >> >> >is nothing but a political arm of this party or that then every
>> >> >> >> >single
>> >> >> >> >decision
>> >> >> >> >that has ever been handed down by the court regarding the
>> >> >> >> >constitution
>> >> >> >> >should be
>> >> >> >> >thrown out as well as there has always been a majority of
>> >> >> >liberal
>> >> >> >> >or
>> >> >> >> >conservative judges in the court.
>> >> >> >> >The funny thing is most of the sudden criticisms we are now
>> >> >> >> >hearing
>> >> >> >> >are
>> >> >> >> >all
>> >> >> >> >about the evil conservatives on the bench but the very same
>> >> >> >people
>> >> >> >> >bitching
>> >> >> >> >about that alleged bias have no problem at all with Obama's
>> >> >> >> >statement
>> >> >> >> >that "when
>> >> >> >> >he gets re-elected" he'll put two more liberal judges on the
>> >> >> >bench
>> >> >> >> >and
>> >> >> >> >make
>> >> >> >> >everything so much easier for him. That right there says more
>> >> >> >> >about
>> >> >> >> >how
>> >> >> >> >liberals and their politicians view the court and how corrupt
>> >> >> >they
>> >> >> >> >would
>> >> >> >> >actually like it to be as opposed to some existing conservative
>> >> >> >> >bias
>> >> >> >> >by
>> >> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >> >SCOTUS against a democratic president. They really want the
>> >> >> >court
>> >> >> >> >to
>> >> >> >> >be
>> >> >> >> >biased.
>> >> >> >> >They just don't like it if they think the bias is not in their
>> >> >> >> >favor.
>> >> >> >> The last thing we need is 2 more liberal judges on the court.
>> >> >> > You are right. We need all of them to be liberal.
>> >> >> Why do you hate the rule of law and the constitution? The only
>> >> >> people
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> are going to uphold that and prevent the rule of men are
>> >> >> conservatives.
>> >> >> Liberals aren't even Americans and nether are you.
>> >> >> Goddamn America.
>> >> >> -Eddie Haskell
>> >> > I've been a citizen of the United States my entire life. You are not
>> >> > since
>> >> > you are Canadian.
>> >> You ceased to be an American the day you threw in with the democrat
>> >> party
>> >> to
>> >> become a traitor and anti-American.
>> >> Goddamn America.
>> >> -Eddie Haskell
>> > I'm a citizen in good standing. I pay my taxes. I don't commit crimes.
>> > My
>> > driver's license has never been suspended. I've never been tossed out >> > of
>> > a
>> > bar for drunkenness. I provide the means of profit for my employer. You
>>> probably can't claim any of those things.
> > > The Tea Party was a fad, and is dying off. That isn't the problem.
> > A group of people caring about constitutional rights fading away is a
> > fad ?
> The Tea Party could care less about Constitutional rights, aside from
> the
> few they agree with.
> > The
> > > problem
> > > is, Congress has given up on caring about the country, as long as they
> > > are in
> > > charge.>
> > > Matt
> > Which party that was in charge of congress had the most responsibilty
> > in revoking constituional rights of citizens at one time in history
> > and did it while a democrat was president.Think long and hard about
> > this.
> I know the answer to this, and you don't, because you believe the
> choices
> are the Republicans or the Democrats.
> Must be a Tea Partier.
> Matt
FDR interring thousands of Japanese Americans during WW2 and pray tell
which party was he the leader of?
History lesson over ; case closed.
> > > > > The Tea Party was a fad, and is dying off. That isn't the problem.
> > > > A group of people caring about constitutional rights fading away is a
> > > > fad ?
> > > The Tea Party could care less about Constitutional rights, aside from
> > > the
> > > few they agree with.
> > > > The
> > > > > problem
> > > > > is, Congress has given up on caring about the country, as long as
> > > > > they
> > > > > are in
> > > > > charge.>
> > > > > Matt
> > > > Which party that was in charge of congress had the most responsibilty
> > > > in revoking constituional rights of citizens at one time in history
> > > > and did it while a democrat was president.Think long and hard about
> > > > this.
> > > I know the answer to this, and you don't, because you believe the
> > > choices
> > > are the Republicans or the Democrats.
> > > Must be a Tea Partier.
> > > Matt
> > FDR interring thousands of Japanese Americans during WW2 and pray tell
> > which party was he the leader of?
> > History lesson over ; case closed.
> While there were a lot of Japanese who ended up being interred due to WW2
> and Roosevets prudent leadership of this country, I suspect that what you
> were really referring to was the internment of Japanese. A lot of them got
> to walk out of the camps alive. No one who is interred has that choice.
So a little bit of internment is ok as long as they got out alive .
Tell that to the millions of those that were sent to re education
camps and gulags in the former Soviet empire. They would be thrilled
to hear your interpretations of "internment".
> On Apr 13, 6:47 pm, "Kirby Grant"<KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 13-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley<wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
>>> On Apr 11, 9:21 pm, Matt<matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 11, 3:58 pm, BillyBobMarley<wha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 11, 10:41 am, Matt<matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 10, 8:38 pm, MattB<trdell1...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Tea Party was a fad, and is dying off. That isn't the problem.
>>>>> A group of people caring about constitutional rights fading away is a
>>>>> fad ?
>>>> The Tea Party could care less about Constitutional rights, aside from
>>>> the
>>>> few they agree with.
>>>>> The
>>>>>> problem
>>>>>> is, Congress has given up on caring about the country, as long as
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> are in
>>>>>> charge.>
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>> Which party that was in charge of congress had the most responsibilty
>>>>> in revoking constituional rights of citizens at one time in history
>>>>> and did it while a democrat was president.Think long and hard about
>>>>> this.
>>>> I know the answer to this, and you don't, because you believe the
>>>> choices
>>>> are the Republicans or the Democrats.
>>>> Must be a Tea Partier.
>>>> Matt
>>> FDR interring thousands of Japanese Americans during WW2 and pray tell
>>> which party was he the leader of?
>>> History lesson over ; case closed.
>> While there were a lot of Japanese who ended up being interred due to WW2
>> and Roosevets prudent leadership of this country, I suspect that what you
>> were really referring to was the internment of Japanese. A lot of them got
>> to walk out of the camps alive. No one who is interred has that choice.
> So a little bit of internment is ok as long as they got out alive .
> Tell that to the millions of those that were sent to re education
> camps and gulags in the former Soviet empire. They would be thrilled
> to hear your interpretations of "internment".
> > > > > > > The Tea Party was a fad, and is dying off. That isn't the
> > > > > >problem.
> > > > > > A group of people caring about constitutional rights fading away
> > > > > >is a
> > > > > > fad ?
> > > > > The Tea Party could care less about Constitutional rights, aside
> > > > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > few they agree with.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > is, Congress has given up on caring about the country, as long
> > > > > >as
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > are in
> > > > > > > charge.>
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > Which party that was in charge of congress had the most
> > > > > >responsibilty
> > > > > > in revoking constituional rights of citizens at one time in
> > > > > >history
> > > > > > and did it while a democrat was president.Think long and hard
> > > > > >about
> > > > > > this.
> > > > > I know the answer to this, and you don't, because you believe the
> > > > > choices
> > > > > are the Republicans or the Democrats.
> > > > > Must be a Tea Partier.
> > > > > Matt
> > > > FDR interring thousands of Japanese Americans during WW2 and pray tell
> > > > which party was he the leader of?
> > > > History lesson over ; case closed.
> > > While there were a lot of Japanese who ended up being interred due to
> > > WW2
> > > and Roosevets prudent leadership of this country, I suspect that what
> > > you
> > > were really referring to was the internment of Japanese. A lot of them
> > > got
> > > to walk out of the camps alive. No one who is interred has that choice.
> > So a little bit of internment is ok as long as they got out alive .
> > Tell that to the millions of those that were sent to re education
> > camps and gulags in the former Soviet empire. They would be thrilled
> > to hear your interpretations of "internment".
> I was merely pointing out your lilliteracy. Perhaps it is you who should be
> interred. The sooner the better.
Ok so you are a hardcore marxist and anyone who does not agree with
you should be thrown into a prison camp.Thanks for clearing that up.
> On 18-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley <wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
> > > > So a little bit of internment is ok as long as they got out alive .
> > > > Tell that to the millions of those that were sent to re education
> > > > camps and gulags in the former Soviet empire. They would be thrilled
> > > > to hear your interpretations of "internment".
> > > I was merely pointing out your lilliteracy. Perhaps it is you who should
> > > be
> > > interred. The sooner the better.
> > Ok so you are a hardcore marxist and anyone who does not agree with
> > you should be thrown into a prison camp.Thanks for clearing that up.
> Not everyone. Just you. Some place that is extremely harsh and totally cut
> off from civilization.
This is the mindset of the marxist obama lovers folks.Look , learn,
and never forget what evil lurks in the minds of people of this ilk.
> On 19-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley <wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
> > On Apr 18, 5:38 pm, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On 18-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley <wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
> > > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
> > > > > > So a little bit of internment is ok as long as they got out alive
> > > > > >.
> > > > > > Tell that to the millions of those that were sent to re education
> > > > > > camps and gulags in the former Soviet empire. They would be
> > > > > >thrilled
> > > > > > to hear your interpretations of "internment".
> > > > > I was merely pointing out your lilliteracy. Perhaps it is you who
> > > > > should
> > > > > be
> > > > > interred. The sooner the better.
> > > > Ok so you are a hardcore marxist and anyone who does not agree with
> > > > you should be thrown into a prison camp.Thanks for clearing that up.
> > > Not everyone. Just you. Some place that is extremely harsh and totally
> > > cut
> > > off from civilization.
> > This is the mindset of the marxist obama lovers folks.Look , learn,
> > and never forget what evil lurks in the minds of people of this ilk.
> And yet in November we are going to re-elect President Obama for four more
> years. Then over those next four years we will groom several individuals who
> will be appear on the scene to run for the Democratic nomination in 2016 and
> we'll put that person in office for eight years as well. Eventually people
> will come to just consider Democrats to be the plankholders of the
> presidency and Republicans will exist only as an anachronism of history.
You however are so very sure of obbooba getting re elected you won't
make a simple wager and won't put your money where your mouth
is.Coward.
> On Apr 19, 10:17 pm, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 19-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley <wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
>> > On Apr 18, 5:38 pm, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > > On 18-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley <wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
>> > > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
>> > > > > > So a little bit of internment is ok as long as they got out >> > > > > > alive
>> > > > > >.
>> > > > > > Tell that to the millions of those that were sent to re >> > > > > > education
>> > > > > > camps and gulags in the former Soviet empire. They would be
>> > > > > >thrilled
>> > > > > > to hear your interpretations of "internment".
>> > > > > I was merely pointing out your lilliteracy. Perhaps it is you who
>> > > > > should
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > interred. The sooner the better.
>> > > > Ok so you are a hardcore marxist and anyone who does not agree with
>> > > > you should be thrown into a prison camp.Thanks for clearing that >> > > > up.
>> > > Not everyone. Just you. Some place that is extremely harsh and >> > > totally
>> > > cut
>> > > off from civilization.
>> > This is the mindset of the marxist obama lovers folks.Look , learn,
>> > and never forget what evil lurks in the minds of people of this ilk.
>> And yet in November we are going to re-elect President Obama for four >> more
>> years. Then over those next four years we will groom several individuals >> who
>> will be appear on the scene to run for the Democratic nomination in 2016 >> and
>> we'll put that person in office for eight years as well. Eventually >> people
>> will come to just consider Democrats to be the plankholders of the
>> presidency and Republicans will exist only as an anachronism of history.
> You however are so very sure of obbooba getting re elected you won't
> make a simple wager and won't put your money where your mouth
> is.Coward.
.
.
.
Hey, Billy Bob, Blacks in America are overtaking you in education and achievements.
Good Luck, Billy Bob, your next boss will black and much better educated than you are!.
> On 22-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley <wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
> > On Apr 19, 10:17 pm, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On 19-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley <wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
> > > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
> > > > On Apr 18, 5:38 pm, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 18-Apr-2012, BillyBobMarley <wha...@gmail.com> wrote at
> > > > > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:
> > > > > > > > So a little bit of internment is ok as long as they got out
> > > > > >alive
> > > > > > > >.
> > > > > > > > Tell that to the millions of those that were sent to re
> > > > > >education
> > > > > > > > camps and gulags in the former Soviet empire. They would be
> > > > > > > >thrilled
> > > > > > > > to hear your interpretations of "internment".
> > > > > > > I was merely pointing out your lilliteracy. Perhaps it is you
> > > > > >who
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > interred. The sooner the better.
> > > > > > Ok so you are a hardcore marxist and anyone who does not agree
> > > > > >with
> > > > > > you should be thrown into a prison camp.Thanks for clearing that
> > > > > >up.
> > > > > Not everyone. Just you. Some place that is extremely harsh and
> > > > > totally
> > > > > cut
> > > > > off from civilization.
> > > > This is the mindset of the marxist obama lovers folks.Look , learn,
> > > > and never forget what evil lurks in the minds of people of this ilk.
> > > And yet in November we are going to re-elect President Obama for four
> > > more
> > > years. Then over those next four years we will groom several individuals
> > > who
> > > will be appear on the scene to run for the Democratic nomination in 2016
> > > and
> > > we'll put that person in office for eight years as well. Eventually
> > > people
> > > will come to just consider Democrats to be the plankholders of the
> > > presidency and Republicans will exist only as an anachronism of history.
> > You however are so very sure of obbooba getting re elected you won't
> > make a simple wager and won't put your money where your mouth
> > is.Coward.
> Only incredibly stupid people ever make wagers. It is one of the things that
> makes them incredibly stupid and immoral. The type of person who would make
> a bet is the type of person who would blow their paycheck on a "sure thing"
> without any regards that they won't be able to feed their children properly.
> There is simply no justification in this world - past, present or future -
> to engage in the disgusting activity of placing a bet on something. A person
> who bets is no better then a rapist, a peodophile, a murderer or a
> kidnapper. So if that is the category you want to put yourself in, than I
> can't stop you but I can sure be disgusted that people like you are allow to
> move about in society....
But you are sooooo sure that Obbooba will be re-elected why can't you
be a man and put your money where your mouth is?Ohh I forgot you
won't.Never mind.Coward.
