Coming soon will be automatic government budget slash - the "sequester" where there are across the board budget cuts. Obama's too stupid and hateful to work with the House Republicans, and that's going to be a disaster.
The Federal Reserve is doing "Qualitative Easing", a.k.a. "buying back security grade bonds", both euphemisms for printing a trillion bucks a year and putting it into the pockets of the bankers that control the federal reserve. (You aren't so ignorant that you think that the Federal Reserve is a government agency, are you?) The Fed says they're going to do it until the "economy gets better". I'm pretty sure that most of you are utterly ignorant of the Weimar Republic and the effects of printing money. You should look that up on Wikipedia.
Then there is the fact that the United States is worse off than Greece by about 30% per capita, but we don't have a Germany to bail us out and demand we address the problem. That's going to bring everything crashing down as well.
Socialist security and Medicaid are also about to go into the toilet.
So, economic wise, we're fucked and fucked bigtime. And it is going to happen on Obama's watch with a Democrat Senate, and their only excuse will be that the Republicans wouldn't let them spend more. Homeland security may have bought a billion bullets, but it won't be enough.
> Coming soon will be automatic government budget slash - the "sequester"
> where there are across the board budget cuts. Obama's too stupid and
> hateful to work with the House Republicans, and that's going to be a
> disaster.
> The Federal Reserve is doing "Qualitative Easing", a.k.a. "buying back
> security grade bonds", both euphemisms for printing a trillion bucks a
> year and putting it into the pockets of the bankers that control the
> federal reserve. (You aren't so ignorant that you think that the Federal
> Reserve is a government agency, are you?) The Fed says they're going to
> do it until the "economy gets better". I'm pretty sure that most of you
> are utterly ignorant of the Weimar Republic and the effects of printing
> money. You should look that up on Wikipedia.
> Then there is the fact that the United States is worse off than Greece by
> about 30% per capita, but we don't have a Germany to bail us out and
> demand we address the problem. That's going to bring everything crashing
> down as well.
> Socialist security and Medicaid are also about to go into the toilet.
> So, economic wise, we're fucked and fucked bigtime. And it is going to
> happen on Obama's watch with a Democrat Senate, and their only excuse
> will be that the Republicans wouldn't let them spend more. Homeland
> security may have bought a billion bullets, but it won't be enough.
But how did you get to this point? Can anyone spell Reagan and the
Bush twins?
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:42:47 -0800, wy wrote:
> On Nov 7, 8:40 pm, Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote:
>> Coming soon will be automatic government budget slash - the "sequester"
>> where there are across the board budget cuts. Obama's too stupid and
>> hateful to work with the House Republicans, and that's going to be a
>> disaster.
>> The Federal Reserve is doing "Qualitative Easing", a.k.a. "buying back
>> security grade bonds", both euphemisms for printing a trillion bucks a
>> year and putting it into the pockets of the bankers that control the
>> federal reserve. (You aren't so ignorant that you think that the
>> Federal Reserve is a government agency, are you?) The Fed says they're
>> going to do it until the "economy gets better". I'm pretty sure that
>> most of you are utterly ignorant of the Weimar Republic and the effects
>> of printing money. You should look that up on Wikipedia.
>> Then there is the fact that the United States is worse off than Greece
>> by about 30% per capita, but we don't have a Germany to bail us out and
>> demand we address the problem. That's going to bring everything
>> crashing down as well.
>> Socialist security and Medicaid are also about to go into the toilet.
>> So, economic wise, we're fucked and fucked bigtime. And it is going to
>> happen on Obama's watch with a Democrat Senate, and their only excuse
>> will be that the Republicans wouldn't let them spend more. Homeland
>> security may have bought a billion bullets, but it won't be enough.
> But how did you get to this point? Can anyone spell Reagan and the Bush
> twins?
Reagan's only crime was having a Democratic congress and agreeing to allowing a hoard of illegal aliens have "amnesty" rather than driving them back out of the country.
Bush started the trillion dollar "bailout" that gave a trillion dollars to the rich. Obama extended the bailout by a factor of 3 and put more debt on Americans than all other presidents combined. No way can a sane person say it wasn't mostly Obama's fault. That's just the numbers.
How did the banks go bad? Because to bad lending practices forced on the banks to buy the black vote for the Democrats. One of the operatives in that buying of votes was Obama, and it was called the Community Re-
investment act.
All that is water under the bridge. The simple fact is, Obama and the Democrats are going to be responsible for holding the bag when the economy goes to hell. The fact that "wy" suffers from Bush derangement syndrome isn't going to change that.
I mean, come on. You're a fucking leach, but even a leach needs a live host to suck the blood out of. You're FUCKED.
> Coming soon will be automatic government budget slash - the "sequester"
> where there are across the board budget cuts. Obama's too stupid and
> hateful to work with the House Republicans, and that's going to be a
> disaster.
> The Federal Reserve is doing "Qualitative Easing", a.k.a. "buying back
> security grade bonds", both euphemisms for printing a trillion bucks a
> year and putting it into the pockets of the bankers that control the
> federal reserve. (You aren't so ignorant that you think that the Federal
> Reserve is a government agency, are you?) The Fed says they're going to
> do it until the "economy gets better". I'm pretty sure that most of you
> are utterly ignorant of the Weimar Republic and the effects of printing
> money. You should look that up on Wikipedia.
> Then there is the fact that the United States is worse off than Greece by
> about 30% per capita, but we don't have a Germany to bail us out and
> demand we address the problem. That's going to bring everything crashing
> down as well.
> Socialist security and Medicaid are also about to go into the toilet.
> So, economic wise, we're fucked and fucked bigtime. And it is going to
> happen on Obama's watch with a Democrat Senate, and their only excuse
> will be that the Republicans wouldn't let them spend more. Homeland
> security may have bought a billion bullets, but it won't be enough.
Who actually spends the money? Or were you freebasing the blackboard
chalk the day they taught that one in civics class?
I'll give you a hint: It's neither the President nor the Senate.
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:50:25 -0800, Morgoth Bauglir wrote:
>> Coming soon will be automatic government budget slash - the "sequester"
>> where there are across the board budget cuts.
> It's the only hope of controlling the military-industrial complex.
> It's long past time.
Social programs are 25% of the budget.
The military is 24%.
And "Physical, human, and community development" is another 7%
Law enforcement is another 2%
They can't cut SS/Medicare or interest on the national debt which make up the rest of government spending. So, the 30% cuts have to come out of these programs.
I'm good with cutting the military. What the hell are we doing defending Europe, Japan, Korea, and Israel for? I would easily make cuts in the "Defense Department".
And I'm very good with cutting socialist programs that the government isn't supposed to be spending money on anyway.
Regardless, however, the economy is going to crap out and Obama and the other commies are going to be holding the bag.
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:14:28 -0800, Igor wrote:
> On Nov 7, 8:40 pm, Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote:
>> Coming soon will be automatic government budget slash - the "sequester"
>> where there are across the board budget cuts. Obama's too stupid and
>> hateful to work with the House Republicans, and that's going to be a
>> disaster.
>> The Federal Reserve is doing "Qualitative Easing", a.k.a. "buying back
>> security grade bonds", both euphemisms for printing a trillion bucks a
>> year and putting it into the pockets of the bankers that control the
>> federal reserve. (You aren't so ignorant that you think that the
>> Federal Reserve is a government agency, are you?) The Fed says they're
>> going to do it until the "economy gets better". I'm pretty sure that
>> most of you are utterly ignorant of the Weimar Republic and the effects
>> of printing money. You should look that up on Wikipedia.
>> Then there is the fact that the United States is worse off than Greece
>> by about 30% per capita, but we don't have a Germany to bail us out and
>> demand we address the problem. That's going to bring everything
>> crashing down as well.
>> Socialist security and Medicaid are also about to go into the toilet.
>> So, economic wise, we're fucked and fucked bigtime. And it is going to
>> happen on Obama's watch with a Democrat Senate, and their only excuse
>> will be that the Republicans wouldn't let them spend more. Homeland
>> security may have bought a billion bullets, but it won't be enough.
> Who actually spends the money? Or were you freebasing the blackboard
> chalk the day they taught that one in civics class?
> I'll give you a hint: It's neither the President nor the Senate.
See if you can sell that inane childish prattle to the people when they find themselves out of work, that there is hyper inflation, and the shelves in the stores are empty.
The people aren't going to care much who they target their anger at, and the way it is now, the Democrats have put themselves right in their cross hairs.
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:50:25 -0800, Morgoth Bauglir wrote:
> >> Coming soon will be automatic government budget slash - the "sequester"
> >> where there are across the board budget cuts.
> > It's the only hope of controlling the military-industrial complex.
> > It's long past time.
> Social programs are 25% of the budget.
> The military is 24%.
> And "Physical, human, and community development" is another 7%
> Law enforcement is another 2%
> They can't cut SS/Medicare or interest on the national debt which make up
> the rest of government spending. So, the 30% cuts have to come out of
> these programs.
> I'm good with cutting the military. What the hell are we doing defending
> Europe, Japan, Korea, and Israel for? I would easily make cuts in the
> "Defense Department".
> And I'm very good with cutting socialist programs that the government
> isn't supposed to be spending money on anyway.
> Regardless, however, the economy is going to crap out and Obama and the
> other commies are going to be holding the bag.
You're correct but Obama and the GimmeeRats will never get/accept
blame. In 40 years, whats left of the GimmeeRat party will STILL be
blaming Reagan.
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:14:28 -0800, Igor wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 8:40 pm, Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote:
> >> Coming soon will be automatic government budget slash - the "sequester"
> >> where there are across the board budget cuts. Obama's too stupid and
> >> hateful to work with the House Republicans, and that's going to be a
> >> disaster.
> >> The Federal Reserve is doing "Qualitative Easing", a.k.a. "buying back
> >> security grade bonds", both euphemisms for printing a trillion bucks a
> >> year and putting it into the pockets of the bankers that control the
> >> federal reserve. (You aren't so ignorant that you think that the
> >> Federal Reserve is a government agency, are you?) The Fed says they're
> >> going to do it until the "economy gets better". I'm pretty sure that
> >> most of you are utterly ignorant of the Weimar Republic and the effects
> >> of printing money. You should look that up on Wikipedia.
> >> Then there is the fact that the United States is worse off than Greece
> >> by about 30% per capita, but we don't have a Germany to bail us out and
> >> demand we address the problem. That's going to bring everything
> >> crashing down as well.
> >> Socialist security and Medicaid are also about to go into the toilet.
> >> So, economic wise, we're fucked and fucked bigtime. And it is going to
> >> happen on Obama's watch with a Democrat Senate, and their only excuse
> >> will be that the Republicans wouldn't let them spend more. Homeland
> >> security may have bought a billion bullets, but it won't be enough.
> > Who actually spends the money? Or were you freebasing the blackboard
> > chalk the day they taught that one in civics class?
> > I'll give you a hint: It's neither the President nor the Senate.
> See if you can sell that inane childish prattle to the people when they
> find themselves out of work, that there is hyper inflation, and the
> shelves in the stores are empty.
> The people aren't going to care much who they target their anger at, and
> the way it is now, the Democrats have put themselves right in their cross
> hairs.- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
But the entitlement crowd is CONVINCED that no matter how large the
deficit, how bad the unemployment numbers, how high the taxes, how
expensive and scarce energy upplies are, how low the value of the
dollar gets Obama will take care of them.
In article <JpudndGtMKhQMAbNnZ2dnUVZ5s6dn...@giganews.com>, Marvin the Martian says...
> . No way can a sane > person say it wasn't mostly Obama's fault. That's just the numbers.
There sure seems to be a lot of insane people in America to just reelect him.
That's what you think though.. right?
Its all those non-Fox viewers that are fucked in the head!
Like believing the polls were right... oh wait... oops.
-- "[The] debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
-Reagan budget chief David Stockman
On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:10:23 -0600, Gary DW wrote:
> In article <JpudndGtMKhQMAbNnZ2dnUVZ5s6dn...@giganews.com>, Marvin the
> Martian says...
>> . No way can a sane person say it wasn't mostly Obama's fault. That's
>> just the numbers.
> There sure seems to be a lot of insane people in America to just reelect
> him.
> That's what you think though.. right?
Not insane. The average IQ of 100 is not very bright, and the product of public schools are woefully ignorant. They are easily fooled.
Take you, for example. You couldn't even read what I said without coming to a false conclusion not at all supported by what I said.
> Its all those non-Fox viewers that are fucked in the head!
> Like believing the polls were right... oh wait... oops
Thanks for bringing this point up, and serving as an example of the state of the electorate. I know you didn't mean to and you thought you scored a "burn", but you did exactly the opposite.
Which is why I say the GOP has to stop running on value issues like abortion and pot legalization and start running on American principles. Most of the little brown people don't understand American principles; we must try to educate them before we drive them out and seize our freedom back.
