LOS ANGELES - Republican lawmakers and candidates are increasingly divided
over illegal immigration - torn between the need to attract Latino support,
especially at the ballot box, and rallying party members who support tougher
action.
Arizona's new measure, which requires that the police check the documents of
anyone they stop or detain whom they suspect of being in the country
illegally, has forced politicians far and wide to take a stance. But unlike
in Washington, where a consensus exists among establishment Republicans, the
fault lines in the states - where the issue is even more visceral and
immediate - are not predictable. ..."
According to the polls 80% favor the Arizona law SB1070.
Left-wing agitprop bullshit.
Republicans who fail to stand up for their constituents and continue
to capitulate to the unAmerican leftist 20 percent will be defeated or
lose power in Congress. Period.
Poor cowardly scum sucker. It doesn't matter what you think, the
courts will decide. And they will decide to throw this
unconstitutional piece of (bleep!) into the trash, were it belongs.
What is fascinating is how rapidly the syphilis infested right wing
forgets. They have to forget that they lost the presidency by a land
slide. That they lost the house by 40 seats and the senate by 9
seats.
Face it loser, Rand Paul(R for Rascist) is what you losers wantd,
voted for and this is what happens, humiliation.
It has been written repeatedly. The immigration issue is the stake
through the GOP's heart:
http://patriot.net/~ramon/GOP-Stake.gif
http://patriot.net/~ramon/Guns-R-Us.gif
(I am having a Photoshop artist replacing the words "Sotomayor
Opposition" with "Arizona Laws", btw)
-Ramon
Proud Member of the US Chamber of Commerce (regular and Hispanic)
So quit calling me commie, will ya'?
100% Supporter of the position on Comprehensive Immigration
Reform being lobbied and led by The US Chamber of Commerce
------------------------------------------------
Black is the New White.
Boehner the New Beaner.
Sarah the New Charo:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004819/
------------------------------------------------
Wait a minute, Killing... I am just a newcomer to this country but I
was told that the most capitalist institution, the embodiment of free
market and anti-communism was the US Chamber of Commerce.
I am very confused. Are they communist now?? When did that happen!?
Was there a memo or something?
"For the 111th Congress, the Chamber will:
* Continue to push for Comprehensive Immigration Reform"
http://www.uschamber.com/issues/index/immigration/default
-Ramon
Fits you perfectly.
An uneducated, dumb, yet funny, hillbilly!
Working the artificial job shortage scam is the life blood of the GOP
and that, of course, fuels bigotry. This is especially true in a
recession.
Even McCain had to flip flop and start supporting what the SPLC called
"nativists."
At the rate they are going the 2012 the GOP nat'l convention will
feature several cross burnings.
Bret Cahill
> Spam this, and spam that. Spamming all the
> spamming spammer brats.
Ordinarily, I'd suggest that you learn to use your news client's killfile
or filter mechanism, but since you're a googlegrouper, I guess you're just
stuck.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com
Any etiquette rebellion is acceptable as long as it is artfully
interesting; which automatically excludes anything Cahill regurgitates.
Let's not forget little one that the position in regards to illegal
immigration of the following institutions has remained virtually
identical along the years:
- The Reagan White House
- The Clinton White House
- The Bushes White House
- The Obama White House
Congress stood up and applauded when previous Mexican presidente
(Vicente Fox) addressed it. We The People had opportunity to elect
other congressmen, who proceeded to stand up and applaud the current
presidente of Mexico. It keeps on happening years after year.
I offer a reasonable explanation.
Could it be the the views of We The People are entirely different from
yours?
The thing that gets me about Cahill is
that he's posts the same old "jokes"
that he posted ten or fifteen years ago.
He may as well post them on a website
and be done with it, saving himself a lot
of repetitive finger labor.
# The USA is busy overseas invading Iraq and Afghanistan (was it invited
in?), while oblivious to being invaded from the South at home.
Will Mexico conquer the United States?
Not that Mexico is deliberately trying to do so, but when Mexican
President can occupy an adjacent lectern to US President, and berate US
about migration, then things have come quite a long way.
Mexico, of course, being governmentally incompetent, and with population
breeding like mad (RC Church sanctions this), looks for a solution to its
problems - and says, in effect, "Go North, young man!" Which he does, by
any means possible.
The porous Border, and desire for cheap labour, help - yet a belated
anxiety provokes cries of KKK?
Yep, the dumb Gringos will wake up one day, and find they must learn
Spanish; with Commander in Chief renamed El Supremo.
Arizona is the only State with any clue.
More on 17 states copying Arizona :
-------------------------------------------------------------
Having trouble viewing this email?
http://campaign.constantcontact.com/render?v=0010VnWG8rakCq1iz6-f7cTMYhL89KvbvBQmUrWWuP1suDKVGjtppazsnPUENfg1WJwqYIWXoSFBLYUb44iI3gcqwPcYwLFBMXqnKcfD4sOWkbz74DbPasoww%3D%3De
17 more states planning Ariz. 'illegal' crackdown
But ICE chief says feds might not 'process' illegals arrested by state
Posted: May 21, 2010
9:00 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
2010 WorldNetDaily
In what is developing into a standoff between states and the federal government that could be bigger
than gun control or even health care, 17 states have launched versions of Arizona's immigration law,
even as federal officials say they may not bother to process illegal aliens caught by the states.
William Gheen, president of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, which has been trying to get
officials to address the open southern border for years, warned the consequences could be dire.
"Over the last couple days, Obama and the chief of ICE have refused to honor their oaths of office,"
he said. "Their constitutional requirement is to enforce existing laws.
"They've told the American public to go eat cake," he said....
Read the rest of the story at....
http://www.alipac.us/article5285.html
So the head of ICE sayd that he won't deal with any illegal
immigrantws if they are first apprehended by local law enforcement.
Isn't that just perfect. Opening the door for any law enforcement
official to simply decide which laws they will or will not enforce.
ICE is bound by federal law to handle any illegal immigrants that are
caught breaking local laws by local law enforcement once they are
found out to be illegal immigrants.
When a good friend got rear ended a couple years back by an illegal
immigrant driving an illegal unregistered uninsured semi ICE didn't
have any problem at all swooping in to give the piece of shit a free
trip home to Mexico.
But That's OK. Guess Arizona will have to let their famous Sheriff
add a few dozen more tents to house the illegal immigrants arrested
for breaking local laws.
Is he keeps popping rightards on their fannies with The Question:
The slow larners will take awhile to figger out that the more the
rightards dodge The Question the more they help Cahill undermine
looneytaria.
> that he's posts the same old "jokes"
> that he posted ten or fifteen years ago.
> He may as well post them on a website
> and be done with it, saving himself a lot
> of repetitive finger labor.
It's touching to see looneytarians become so concerned about others.
Bret Cahill