http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-retired-nsa-analyst-proves-go...
stealing-elections/article20598.html

NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections
1.2K
Politics | Denis G Campbell | October 25, 2012 6:00 PM

By Denis G. Campbell and
Charley James
(c) 25 October 2012

UPDATED: Why is Mitt Romney so confident?

In states where the winner will be decided by less than 10%, of the vote
he already knows he will win. This is no tinfoil hat conspiracy. It’s a
maths problem. And mathematics showed changes in actual raw voting data
that had no statistical correlation other than programmable computer
fraud. This computer fraud resulted in votes being flipped from Democrat
to Republican in every federal, senatorial, congressional and
gubernatorial election since 2008 (thus far) and in the 2012 primary
contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney.

This goes well beyond Romney’s investment control in voting machine maker
Hart Intercivic and Diebold’s close ties to George W. Bush. Indeed all
five voting machine companies have very strong GOP fundraising ties, yet
executives (including the candidate’s son Tagg Romney) insist there is no
conflict between massively supporting one party financially whilst
controlling the machines that record and count the votes.

A retired NSA analyst has spent several sleepless nights applying a
simple formula to past election results across Arizona. His results
showed across-the-board systemic election fraud on a coordinated and
massive scale. But the analysis indicated that this only happens in
larger precincts because anomalies in small precincts can be more easily
detected.

The bigger the precinct (x axis) the higher the number of votes for
Romney and corresponding decrease for Santorum and Paul when all lines
should look like the Gingrich line. (Source: MA Duniho)

“Easy to Cheat”
Retired NSA analyst Michael Duniho has worked for nearly seven years
trying to understand voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and
Pima County. This publication has written extensively about apparent vote
machine manipulation in a 2006 RTA Bond issue election that is still
being fought in the courts. Said Duniho, “It is really easy to cheat
using computers to count votes, because you can’t see what is going on in
the machine.”

When Duniho applied a mathematical model to actual voting results in the
largest voting precincts, he saw that only the large precincts suddenly
trended towards Mitt Romney in the Arizona primary – and indeed all
Republicans in every election since 2008 – by a factor of 8%-10%. The
Republican candidate in every race saw an 8-10%. gain in his totals
whilst the Democrat lost 8-10%. This is a swing of up to 20 point, enough
to win an election unless a candidate was losing very badly.

Since sifting through and decoding massive amounts of data was his work
for decades on behalf of the National Security Agency, he wanted to
understand why this was ONLY happening in large precincts.

Nose Counting
The idea of examining large precinct results came via a link to a report
written by Francois Choquette and James Johnson. Choquette became curious
about South Carolina primary results in the February Republican contest.
There a poll observer noted an unusually big gain of votes for Mitt
Romney in larger precincts than in smaller ones. Choquette wanted to know
why?

He examined and applied all of the normal statistical markers to see
where a variance might occur: income level, population density, race,
urban vs. rural, even party registration numbers. He found no correlation
to explain why Romney votes trended upward while Paul and Santorum votes
trended downward -yet only in large precincts.

Choquette then looked at all 50 states and found roughly a 10% switch in
votes from Democrat to GOP. This was noted in every state except Utah,
where the presumption was, as it was Mitt’s religious home state and very
conservative, there was no chance of Romney losing and no variance was
found.

Choquette even saw in Maricopa County, which is Phoenix and its suburbs,
that in 2008 Romney used this technique against John McCain. But McCain
beat him by too much for a 10% fraud gain to matter. McCain tried to do
the same thing in the general election to President Obama but 9 million
votes nationally were too many to make up.

Examining every county across America was too massive an undertaking for
any one person so he included a simple set of instructions and encouraged
others to do the same with raw vote totals in their county/state.

1. Download the text files of all raw actual vote results by precinct
from the Secretary of State’s Office.

2. Arrange them in precinct order.

3. Put in all of the candidate totals for each precinct.

4. Sort the data by total vote smallest on the top.

Now here it gets a bit dense: He needed to add columns that show
cumulative totals by candidate then compare them by candidate to
establish trend lines.

That reveals trends should remain statistically constant throughout an
election.

Stealing Votes
But as the spreadsheet shows, the larger the precinct, the numbers start
to change dramatically.

“If percentages did not change from one precinct to the next, we would
see a flat line, but what we are seeing is sloped lines downward for
Democrats and upward for Republicans (or, in the case of the Presidential
primary, upward for Romney and downward for his opponents), said Duniho.”

In every election contest, the trend lines dramatically crossed for no
apparent reason. It was revealed that votes were being systemically bled
off for Rick Santorum and Ron Paul and then being credited to Mitt Romney.

Once Duniho completed the spreadsheet, he pumped in actual vote totals
from other Arizona election contests.

Chart showing Barber v Kelly special election to replace Gabby Giffords
result in Pima County where the margin of victory was too large even with
the supposed 'fix' in to overcome.

He looked at every 2010 race in Arizona from Governor Brewer to Senator
McCain and Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. The trends lines all did the
exact same thing. Someone had manipulated the election outcome, most
likely one person inserting a programme inside the system’s central
computer… that flipped votes.

The results were astounding.

They showed that Governor Brewer actually lost her election and Gabby
Gifford’s razor thin less than 1% point re-election victory over Tea
Party Conservative Jesse Kelly was closer to a 20 point victory for her.

Duniho added, “We need to have strong hand count audits to confirm the
integrity of these elections. This means comparing hand counts with
official reports of the election.”

Ohio Precedent
This isn’t the first time Republicans have been charged with vote theft.
It happened in the 2004 presidential election, in Ohio and Florida.

In Ohio, GOP consultant Michael Connell claimed that the vote count
computer program he had created for the state had a trap door that
shifted Democratic votes to the GOP.

He was subpoenaed as a witness in a lawsuit against then-Secretary of
State Ken Blackwell, and lawyers for the plaintiff asked the Dept. of
Justice to provide him with security because there were two threats made
against Connell’s life by people associated with Karl Rove. But in Dec.
2008, before the trial began, Connell was killed in a plane crash outside
Akron Ohio.

There were problems in Florida, as well.

A study by the Quantitative Methods Research Team at the University of
California at Berkeley found that anomalies between Florida counties
using touch-screen voting and those using other methods could not be
explained statistically. Noting the higher-than-expected votes for Bush
in three large Democratic counties, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach,
Michael Hout, a Berkeley professor who did the study said there were
strong suspicions of vote-rigging.

“No matter how many factors and variables we took into consideration, the
significant correlation in the votes for President Bush and electronic
voting cannot be explained,” Hout said. “The study shows that a county’s
use of electronic voting resulted in a disproportionate increase in votes
for President Bush. There is just a trivial probability of evidence like
this appearing in a population where the true difference is zero—less
than once in a thousand chances.”

Don’t Trust, Verify
Indeed the only way to 100% verify this election fraud would be through
handcounts of ballots by precinct, matching those results to the reported
totals. But as was mentioned earlier, a group in Pima County has been
trying unsuccessfully to get access to ballots to conduct such a count
for almost five years since anomalies first surfaced in voting machines
in 2006.

Is there a judge in Arizona likely to suddenly reverse past trends and
allow access to conduct such a handcount of ballots 12 days before a
national election? And if not, why not? Maybe someone needs to commission
the Anonymous hacker group to re-level the playing field because the
courts are not going to do it.

The results of Duniho’s analysis can only happen if votes are being
stolen, and the only way that’s possible is if the computerised machines
are programmed to steal them. Welcome to Zimbabwe.

More than 100 million Americans will cast their ballots thinking their
vote will be fairly counted. It should be. Yet the crooks know they can
safely flip up to 10% of votes without consequence. Anything more than
that is statistically suspect.

    Economy & Budget
    Energy & Environment
    Defense & National Security
    Politics
    Technology & Freedom
    Healthcare

    Staff Reporters
        John Gizzi
        David Harsanyi
        John Hayward
        Hope Hodge
        Audrey Hudson
        Neil W. McCabe
    Contributors
        Gary Bauer
        Al DiGuido
        James R. Edwards, Jr.
        Steven Greenhut
        Mark LaRochelle
        Robert Maginnis
    Columnists
        Michael Barone
        Pat Buchanan
        Linda Chavez
        Ann Coulter
        Maggie Gallagher
Election 2012

Is voter fraud being committed in Ohio?

By: Sara Marie Brenner
10/26/2012 09:25 PM

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Two volunteer poll workers at an Ohio voting station
told Human Events that they observed van loads of Ohio residents born
in Somalia — the state is home to the second-largest Somali population
in the United States — being driven to the voting station and guided
by Democratic interpreters on the voting process. No Republican
interpreters were present, according to these volunteers.

While it’s not unusual for get-out-the-vote groups to help voters get
to the polls, the volunteers who talked to Human Events observed a
number of troubling and questionable activities.

A source, who wishes to remain anonymous, is a volunteer outside the
Morse Road polling center.  She has witnessed Somalis who cannot speak
English come to the polling center. They are brought in groups, by van
or bus. The Democrats hand them a slate card and say, “vote Brown all
the way down.” Given that Sherrod Brown is the incumbent Democrat
Senator in Ohio, one can assume that this is the reference.

Non-English speaking voters may use an interpreter. The interpreters
are permitted by law to interpret for the individual voting; however,
they are forbidden from influencing their vote in any way. Another
source who also wishes to remain anonymous has seen Democrat
interpreters show the non-English speaking Somalis how to vote the
Democrat slate that they were handed outside. According to this second
source, there are not any Republican Somali interpreters available.

The logical follow-up question is whether a non-English speaking
person is an American citizen. Although Republican leadership in Ohio
passed a voting reform law, it was repealed by the legislature itself
after the Democrats threatened a referendum. According to the Ohio
Secretary of State’s web site, someone wanting to vote early in Ohio
must supply one of the following in writing on the absentee ballot
form, whether voting early by mail or in person: an Ohio driver’s
license number; the last four digits of the social security number; or
a copy of a current and valid photo identification, military
identification, or a current — within the last 12 months — utility
bill, including cell phone bill, bank statement, government check,
paycheck, or other government document that shows the person’s name
and address in addition to the voter registration acknowledgement.

The voter is not required to show the driver’s license or social
security card, but must merely write it on the absentee ballot request
form. While the individual would be required to show a utility bill,
bank statement or other printed document if he or she chooses that
option, this is in lieu of writing the driver’s license or social
security number. Therefore, the information cannot be checked against
the Bureau of Motor Vehicles or other state databases. Essentially, a
person is asked to check a box stating that they are a citizen, and
the poll worker is to trust that they are the person who is listed on
the item being shown or the information being written. In other words,
someone can be an illegal resident of the state of Ohio and the United
States, get an apartment, turn on the heat, bring in the Columbia Gas
bill, register to vote by the deadline, and vote by showing that same
bill. There is then no verification that this individual is a citizen
of the United States.

Matt McClellan, the press secretary for Ohio Secretary of State Jon
Husted, explained, “There is a process to challenge a voter’s
eligibility. The point in time for a challenge to be brought ended mid
October. A poll worker could challenge a voter if they had questions
as to whether or not a voter was registered or eligible to vote.”
However, if the poll worker does not raise the issue at the time the
voting occurs, that person’s vote will otherwise be counted on
election day along with everyone else’s vote. McClellan was not aware
of any reports of irregularities at the Morse Road voting place in
Franklin County.

Two phone calls and a text message to the Public Information Office at
the Franklin County Board of Elections were not returned.

According to the Somali Community Association of Ohio’s web site, over
45,000 Somalis live in Ohio. Only 40 percent have become citizens of
the United States, and only 25 percent speak English well enough to
get a job.

The second source mentioned has seen voter intimidation at this same
voting place. A Mitt Romney bus stopped near the voting center,
approximately 30 Democrats who were outside handing out the slate
cards rushed over to the bus. They yelled at the bus, and swarmed
around its door when anyone attempted to exit the bus. This, from the
“tolerant left.”

The problem now is he just tipped his hand to Karl Rove how to cover
his tracks better.

But I loved hearing about who _really_ won this or that election!

Back when you were still an American, you might have found it
discomfiting that Tagg Romney had a controlling interest in the company
that owns most of the e-voting machines in Ohio.

But Obama is (factually) so popular, it's going to take every dirty
trick the GOP has.

However, a LOT of Ohioans happen to work within the scope of the auto
industry. Care to bet on who they will vote for?

Obama got the CEO of GM - the one who drove them over the cliff - to
retire. Then he kept the money inside the company itself, so it could
recover.

   IF Obama hadn't been asleep for the first 'debate'
   things would have been different. A lot of people
   seem to have made up their minds that night. Oh
   well, what's the old saying, 'if you snooze you
   lose' ... especially if you snooze on national TV.

   Regardless ... if Obama squeaks out a win, all the
   Republicans will say he cheated his way to victory.
   If Romney wins, all the Dems will say HE was the
   cheat. The split between the 'sides' will grow
   even wider and nobody's gonna be happy.

   IMHO, the split is already destructively wide as
   it is now ....

   IMHO, both of these guys are serious fuck-ups
   in their own special ways - and we're gonna be
   STUCK with one of them in a vulnerable period.
   Mitt thinks a near-slave labor force is a great
   idea, Obama prefers slavery to the almighty
   State (well, almighty politicians anyway). So,
   either way, it's NOT gonna be nice or civil.