NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections
Politics | Denis G Campbell | October 25, 2012 6:00 PM
By Denis G. Campbell and
(c) 25 October 2012
UPDATED: Why is Mitt Romney so confident?
In states where the winner will be decided by less than 10%, of the vote he already knows he will win. This is no tinfoil hat conspiracy. It’s a maths problem. And mathematics showed changes in actual raw voting data that had no statistical correlation other than programmable computer fraud. This computer fraud resulted in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican in every federal, senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial election since 2008 (thus far) and in the 2012 primary contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney.
This goes well beyond Romney’s investment control in voting machine maker Hart Intercivic and Diebold’s close ties to George W. Bush. Indeed all five voting machine companies have very strong GOP fundraising ties, yet executives (including the candidate’s son Tagg Romney) insist there is no conflict between massively supporting one party financially whilst controlling the machines that record and count the votes.
A retired NSA analyst has spent several sleepless nights applying a simple formula to past election results across Arizona. His results showed across-the-board systemic election fraud on a coordinated and massive scale. But the analysis indicated that this only happens in larger precincts because anomalies in small precincts can be more easily detected.
The bigger the precinct (x axis) the higher the number of votes for Romney and corresponding decrease for Santorum and Paul when all lines should look like the Gingrich line. (Source: MA Duniho)
“Easy to Cheat”
Retired NSA analyst Michael Duniho has worked for nearly seven years trying to understand voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and Pima County. This publication has written extensively about apparent vote machine manipulation in a 2006 RTA Bond issue election that is still being fought in the courts. Said Duniho, “It is really easy to cheat using computers to count votes, because you can’t see what is going on in the machine.”
When Duniho applied a mathematical model to actual voting results in the largest voting precincts, he saw that only the large precincts suddenly trended towards Mitt Romney in the Arizona primary – and indeed all Republicans in every election since 2008 – by a factor of 8%-10%. The Republican candidate in every race saw an 8-10%. gain in his totals whilst the Democrat lost 8-10%. This is a swing of up to 20 point, enough to win an election unless a candidate was losing very badly.
Since sifting through and decoding massive amounts of data was his work for decades on behalf of the National Security Agency, he wanted to understand why this was ONLY happening in large precincts.
The idea of examining large precinct results came via a link to a report written by Francois Choquette and James Johnson. Choquette became curious about South Carolina primary results in the February Republican contest. There a poll observer noted an unusually big gain of votes for Mitt Romney in larger precincts than in smaller ones. Choquette wanted to know why?
He examined and applied all of the normal statistical markers to see where a variance might occur: income level, population density, race, urban vs. rural, even party registration numbers. He found no correlation to explain why Romney votes trended upward while Paul and Santorum votes trended downward -yet only in large precincts.
Choquette then looked at all 50 states and found roughly a 10% switch in votes from Democrat to GOP. This was noted in every state except Utah, where the presumption was, as it was Mitt’s religious home state and very conservative, there was no chance of Romney losing and no variance was found.
Choquette even saw in Maricopa County, which is Phoenix and its suburbs, that in 2008 Romney used this technique against John McCain. But McCain beat him by too much for a 10% fraud gain to matter. McCain tried to do the same thing in the general election to President Obama but 9 million votes nationally were too many to make up.
Examining every county across America was too massive an undertaking for any one person so he included a simple set of instructions and encouraged others to do the same with raw vote totals in their county/state.
1. Download the text files of all raw actual vote results by precinct from the Secretary of State’s Office.
2. Arrange them in precinct order.
3. Put in all of the candidate totals for each precinct.
4. Sort the data by total vote smallest on the top.
Now here it gets a bit dense: He needed to add columns that show cumulative totals by candidate then compare them by candidate to establish trend lines.
That reveals trends should remain statistically constant throughout an election.
But as the spreadsheet shows, the larger the precinct, the numbers start to change dramatically.
“If percentages did not change from one precinct to the next, we would see a flat line, but what we are seeing is sloped lines downward for Democrats and upward for Republicans (or, in the case of the Presidential primary, upward for Romney and downward for his opponents), said Duniho.”
In every election contest, the trend lines dramatically crossed for no apparent reason. It was revealed that votes were being systemically bled off for Rick Santorum and Ron Paul and then being credited to Mitt Romney.
Once Duniho completed the spreadsheet, he pumped in actual vote totals from other Arizona election contests.
Chart showing Barber v Kelly special election to replace Gabby Giffords result in Pima County where the margin of victory was too large even with the supposed 'fix' in to overcome.
He looked at every 2010 race in Arizona from Governor Brewer to Senator McCain and Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. The trends lines all did the exact same thing. Someone had manipulated the election outcome, most likely one person inserting a programme inside the system’s central computer… that flipped votes.
The results were astounding.
They showed that Governor Brewer actually lost her election and Gabby Gifford’s razor thin less than 1% point re-election victory over Tea Party Conservative Jesse Kelly was closer to a 20 point victory for her.
Duniho added, “We need to have strong hand count audits to confirm the integrity of these elections. This means comparing hand counts with official reports of the election.”
This isn’t the first time Republicans have been charged with vote theft. It happened in the 2004 presidential election, in Ohio and Florida.
In Ohio, GOP consultant Michael Connell claimed that the vote count computer program he had created for the state had a trap door that shifted Democratic votes to the GOP.
He was subpoenaed as a witness in a lawsuit against then-Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, and lawyers for the plaintiff asked the Dept. of Justice to provide him with security because there were two threats made against Connell’s life by people associated with Karl Rove. But in Dec. 2008, before the trial began, Connell was killed in a plane crash outside Akron Ohio.
There were problems in Florida, as well.
A study by the Quantitative Methods Research Team at the University of California at Berkeley found that anomalies between Florida counties using touch-screen voting and those using other methods could not be explained statistically. Noting the higher-than-expected votes for Bush in three large Democratic counties, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach, Michael Hout, a Berkeley professor who did the study said there were strong suspicions of vote-rigging.
“No matter how many factors and variables we took into consideration, the significant correlation in the votes for President Bush and electronic voting cannot be explained,” Hout said. “The study shows that a county’s use of electronic voting resulted in a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush. There is just a trivial probability of evidence like this appearing in a population where the true difference is zero—less than once in a thousand chances.”
Don’t Trust, Verify
Indeed the only way to 100% verify this election fraud would be through handcounts of ballots by precinct, matching those results to the reported totals. But as was mentioned earlier, a group in Pima County has been trying unsuccessfully to get access to ballots to conduct such a count for almost five years since anomalies first surfaced in voting machines in 2006.
Is there a judge in Arizona likely to suddenly reverse past trends and allow access to conduct such a handcount of ballots 12 days before a national election? And if not, why not? Maybe someone needs to commission the Anonymous hacker group to re-level the playing field because the courts are not going to do it.
The results of Duniho’s analysis can only happen if votes are being stolen, and the only way that’s possible is if the computerised machines are programmed to steal them. Welcome to Zimbabwe.
More than 100 million Americans will cast their ballots thinking their vote will be fairly counted. It should be. Yet the crooks know they can safely flip up to 10% of votes without consequence. Anything more than that is statistically suspect.
President Obama won by such a huge margin in 2008 that even with this anomaly built into the system, he cruised to victory. This year the
Economy & Budget
Energy & Environment
Defense & National Security
Technology & Freedom
Neil W. McCabe
James R. Edwards, Jr.
Is voter fraud being committed in Ohio?
By: Sara Marie Brenner
10/26/2012 09:25 PM
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Two volunteer poll workers at an Ohio voting station
told Human Events that they observed van loads of Ohio residents born
in Somalia — the state is home to the second-largest Somali population
in the United States — being driven to the voting station and guided
by Democratic interpreters on the voting process. No Republican
interpreters were present, according to these volunteers.
While it’s not unusual for get-out-the-vote groups to help voters get
to the polls, the volunteers who talked to Human Events observed a
number of troubling and questionable activities.
A source, who wishes to remain anonymous, is a volunteer outside the
Morse Road polling center. She has witnessed Somalis who cannot speak
English come to the polling center. They are brought in groups, by van
or bus. The Democrats hand them a slate card and say, “vote Brown all
the way down.” Given that Sherrod Brown is the incumbent Democrat
Senator in Ohio, one can assume that this is the reference.
Non-English speaking voters may use an interpreter. The interpreters
are permitted by law to interpret for the individual voting; however,
they are forbidden from influencing their vote in any way. Another
source who also wishes to remain anonymous has seen Democrat
interpreters show the non-English speaking Somalis how to vote the
Democrat slate that they were handed outside. According to this second
source, there are not any Republican Somali interpreters available.
The logical follow-up question is whether a non-English speaking
person is an American citizen. Although Republican leadership in Ohio
passed a voting reform law, it was repealed by the legislature itself
after the Democrats threatened a referendum. According to the Ohio
Secretary of State’s web site, someone wanting to vote early in Ohio
must supply one of the following in writing on the absentee ballot
form, whether voting early by mail or in person: an Ohio driver’s
license number; the last four digits of the social security number; or
a copy of a current and valid photo identification, military
identification, or a current — within the last 12 months — utility
bill, including cell phone bill, bank statement, government check,
paycheck, or other government document that shows the person’s name
and address in addition to the voter registration acknowledgement.
The voter is not required to show the driver’s license or social
security card, but must merely write it on the absentee ballot request
form. While the individual would be required to show a utility bill,
bank statement or other printed document if he or she chooses that
option, this is in lieu of writing the driver’s license or social
security number. Therefore, the information cannot be checked against
the Bureau of Motor Vehicles or other state databases. Essentially, a
person is asked to check a box stating that they are a citizen, and
the poll worker is to trust that they are the person who is listed on
the item being shown or the information being written. In other words,
someone can be an illegal resident of the state of Ohio and the United
States, get an apartment, turn on the heat, bring in the Columbia Gas
bill, register to vote by the deadline, and vote by showing that same
bill. There is then no verification that this individual is a citizen
of the United States.
Matt McClellan, the press secretary for Ohio Secretary of State Jon
Husted, explained, “There is a process to challenge a voter’s
eligibility. The point in time for a challenge to be brought ended mid
October. A poll worker could challenge a voter if they had questions
as to whether or not a voter was registered or eligible to vote.”
However, if the poll worker does not raise the issue at the time the
voting occurs, that person’s vote will otherwise be counted on
election day along with everyone else’s vote. McClellan was not aware
of any reports of irregularities at the Morse Road voting place in
Two phone calls and a text message to the Public Information Office at
the Franklin County Board of Elections were not returned.
According to the Somali Community Association of Ohio’s web site, over
45,000 Somalis live in Ohio. Only 40 percent have become citizens of
the United States, and only 25 percent speak English well enough to
get a job.
The second source mentioned has seen voter intimidation at this same
voting place. A Mitt Romney bus stopped near the voting center,
approximately 30 Democrats who were outside handing out the slate
cards rushed over to the bus. They yelled at the bus, and swarmed
around its door when anyone attempted to exit the bus. This, from the
All elements of this story are still developing and will be updated as
new information is uncovered. Stay tuned.
> > I hear it on good inside information that Romney was all for saving
> > the Auto industry----and the op-ed piece he wrote was
> > "mis-interpreted".
> > And he wouldn't lie, would he?
> Romney wanted the kind of "bankruptcy" paperwork that destroys the
> company (and its unions) and rewards himself.
> Obama got the CEO of GM - the one who drove them over the cliff - to
> retire. Then he kept the money inside the company itself, so it could
> Yes, wingnuts, I know it's so rare it looks miraculous, but SOMETIMES
> when a CEO screws up, he's punished for it. Not all of the workers.
GM got billions of dollars it will never repay. Romney's plan would
have allowed GM to go through managed bankruptcy, and then Romney
would have given them loans to keep them afloat and get back on their
feet. The Democratic BS that says bankruptcy meant shutting their
doors is false.
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:40:08 -0700, Phlip wrote:
> On Oct 27, 7:29 pm, "Mr.B1ack" <nowh...@nada.net> wrote:
>> Tisk ... ALREADY laying the propaganda groundwork for an Obama loss I
>> see .....
> Compare the sizes of Obama rallies to Romney rallies...
The Romney crowd tends to be a bit older - meaning
they have jobs, careers or interest income from such
persuits. Less time and inclination to wander out for
rallies. They'll show up at the polls though ....
> ...to their purported "neck-and-neck" poll numbers.
Sorry, but that's the landscape. Obama WAS well
ahead, and then he blew it. A number of the key
states are so close we may see a "W"-v-Gore situation with endless recounts, endless lawyers,
endless accusations .... oh the joy of it all .....
IF Obama hadn't been asleep for the first 'debate'
things would have been different. A lot of people
seem to have made up their minds that night. Oh
well, what's the old saying, 'if you snooze you
lose' ... especially if you snooze on national TV.
Regardless ... if Obama squeaks out a win, all the
Republicans will say he cheated his way to victory.
If Romney wins, all the Dems will say HE was the
cheat. The split between the 'sides' will grow
even wider and nobody's gonna be happy.
IMHO, the split is already destructively wide as
it is now ....
Whatta you think ... martial law within 10 years ?
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:28:39 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:46:41 -0500, "Mr.B1ack" <nowh...@nada.net> wrote:
>> Whatta you think ... martial law within 10 years ?
> No---If Rumney wins---Count on another military engagement in 1-2 years
Well, that's Obama's plan too when you get
right down to it - especially if economic
recover lags or is even dragged down by
the EU. The rule is "DISTRACT !" ... so expect Iran to be bombed, causing a huge
furor (not to mention drifting radioactive
dust) which will lead to everlasting wars
both hot and cold.
IMHO, both of these guys are serious fuck-ups
in their own special ways - and we're gonna be
STUCK with one of them in a vulnerable period.
Mitt thinks a near-slave labor force is a great
idea, Obama prefers slavery to the almighty
State (well, almighty politicians anyway). So,
either way, it's NOT gonna be nice or civil.
And when it gets too uncivil ... that's when the
guys with armored vehicles show up. Now the only
question is whether they're daft enough to be
loyal to the guys who fucked everything up, or
to Ma and Pa and sister Sue.