Re: Idiot Gibbs: Crook USC 18 Sec 600 violator Bonzo Reagan doesn't want supporters to "run against each other"
RichTravsky
>
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 04:07:18 +0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
> <leroys...@usurper.org> wrote:
>
> >http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/06/gibbs-obama-
> >doesnt-want-supporters-to-run-against-each-other/1
> >
> >White House spokesman Robert Gibbs didn't have much to say today about
> >claims by a second politician that officials floated an administration job
> >in exchange for dropping out of a race against a White House-favored
> >candidate.
> >
> >Gibbs did say the White House did nothing improper with regard to Andrew
> >Romanoff, who is running against Obama-backed Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Col.
"Sen. S.I. Hayakawa on Wednesday spurned a Reagan administration suggestion
that if he drops out of the crowded Republican Senate primary race in
California, President Reagan would find him a job."
> >"The president has an interest in ensuring that supporters don't run
> >against each other in contested primaries," Gibbs said.
> >
> >Republicans continued to point out that Pennsylvania Senate candidate Joe
> >Sestak -- who defeated incumbent Arlen Specter in a primary last month --
> >had said that officials offered him a job to forgo that race.
> >
> >"The fastest way for the American people to get the answers they deserve
> >about this troubling pattern of conduct is for the White House to come
> >clean and disclose its use of federal appointments to manipulate
> >elections," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.
> >
> >Boehner said the incident runs contrary to Obama's pledge of open
> >government.
> >
> >Gibbs disputed that criticism, citing decisions to release records of
> >White House visits and meetings, and reject campaign contributions from
> >lobbyists and political action committees.
> >
> >"Those are efforts that we're quite proud of," he said.
> too bad the attorney general is an Obama employee . he will not
> investigate his boss . he will also not allow an independent
> investigation because he is a liebigot and supports liebigot crime to
> further the liebigot agenda . It is how they operate .
>
> Obama would be impeached if an investigation ever came out . then
> maybe his fraud for office would be exposed . then if that happened
What fraud?
> all of his laws he has passed and all his appointees would be removed
> .
> liebigot criminals are not going to allow that to happen . By the time
> republicans have enough power again to force an investigation it will
> be too late . They only need a majority vote to force the thing .
Force what thing?
> maybe some dems that want to keep their jobs will step up to the plate
> .