[I]Oooooh, nice

[GaryN]

You won't be able to see it online until Friday (I get mine early as a
subscriber) but I think Private Eye might have gone just a leeeeetle too
far with the latest cover. Laughed my arse off!

Just wait for those court actions!

gary

--
"If it's political it ain't correct mate, those two words don't fucking
fit"

Kevin Bloody Wilson.

[Chris Zakes]

On Wed, 16 May 2012 10:23:25 -0500, an orbital mind-control laser
caused GaryN <webm...@oxtoyrun.org.uk> to write:

>You won't be able to see it online until Friday (I get mine early as a
>subscriber) but I think Private Eye might have gone just a leeeeetle too
>far with the latest cover. Laughed my arse off!
>
>Just wait for those court actions!
>
>gary

How does it compare to the recent Time and Newsweek covers?

http://popwatch.ew.com/2012/05/14/newsweek-time-cover-controversy-poll/

-Chris Zakes
Texas
--

It has demanded us to deliver up our arms, which are essential to our defence, the
rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.

-Texas Declaration of Independence

[GaryN]

Chris Zakes <dont...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:m9p9r79k9k4q7rq5l...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 16 May 2012 10:23:25 -0500, an orbital mind-control laser
> caused GaryN <webm...@oxtoyrun.org.uk> to write:
>
>>You won't be able to see it online until Friday (I get mine early as a
>>subscriber) but I think Private Eye might have gone just a leeeeetle
>>too far with the latest cover. Laughed my arse off!
>>
>>Just wait for those court actions!
>>
>>gary
>
> How does it compare to the recent Time and Newsweek covers?
>
> http://popwatch.ew.com/2012/05/14/newsweek-time-cover-controversy-
poll/
>
> -Chris Zakes
> Texas

Much nastier, and probably more likely to get sued for this than for the
Diana cover.

It'll be online tomorrow.

http://www.private-eye.co.uk/

Not sure if you would know but there is a major investigation going on
in UK about media phone hacking by NI and our beloved Rebekha is in the
middle of it.

From the picture used she could star in a remake of "The Witches of
Eastwick" or as one of Dracula's brides in a remake of "Van Helsing".

Talking about consorting with "The Devil known to all as Murdoch[1]" is
probably good for a libel case as well.

We shall see. I thought it was hilarious.

gary

[1]Sly reference to 'Moloch'

--
"What else is civilisation than the ability to make use of things
invented by someone else?"

Karel Capek (in "War With The Newts")

[Nigel Stapley]

Having now seen it, I have to express a certain disappointment. I mean,
it's hardly Gilray, is it? I think the late, great Lord Gnome would have
gone a lot further.

--
Regards

Nigel Stapley

www.thejudge.me.uk

<reply-to will bounce>

[GaryN]

Nigel Stapley <un...@judgemental.plus.com> wrote in
news:caSdnYyaPY3WXCvS...@brightview.co.uk:

I think they've had to be a bit careful since the outrage over the
'Diana' cover but with the ongoing trial, sorry "Enquiry", I suppose
they had to be a bit more careful.

gary

[Robert Carnegie]

On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:23:25 PM UTC+1, GaryN wrote:
> You won't be able to see it online until Friday (I get mine early as a
> subscriber) but I think Private Eye might have gone just a leeeeetle too
> far with the latest cover. Laughed my arse off!
>
> Just wait for those court actions!
>
> gary

Apparently Charlie Brooks, her husband, said
that she's the victim of a witch hunt. So they
couldn't /not/ do it.

[GaryN]

Robert Carnegie <rja.ca...@excite.com> wrote in
news:c1a364a4-b55e-453c...@googlegroups.com:

Quite right too. I've met the woman, she lives quite close, and I couldn't
stand her. You may think I'm arrogant, and I admit I am, but I'm no match
for her!

The picture was perfect, if that's not a witch then what is? It was "The
Devil known as Murdoch" that I suspect may get the litigation going.
Still, PE is used to being sued and often wins. I liked the way they
artificially aged the cover (as said I have hard copy).