Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
""""Attention Obozo: You're Fucked! "Democratic strategist: Party 'in decline'" (snicker)
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Johnny Asia
May 14, 2013, 3:49:02 PM5/14/13
to
Attention Obozo: You're Fucked!
"Democratic strategist: Party 'in decline'"
Politico: One of the Democrats’ most veteran strategists warns that
the party is “in decline” and “at considerable risk” when President
Barack Obama is no longer on the scene.
“Since Obama was elected President, the Democrats have lost nine
governorships, 56 members of the House and two Senate seats,” Doug
Sosnik, the political director in Bill Clinton’s White House, writes
in a new memo.
While Republican branding problems get the lion’s share of attention,
the Democratic Party’s favorability rating has declined by 15 points
since Obama took power. A Pew Research Center survey this January
showed that the Democratic Party was viewed favorably by 47 percent of
Americans, down from 62 percent in Jan. 2009.
With the likelihood of gridlock and near-record-low confidence in
public institutions, Sosnik expects 2014 to bring the fourth change
election in the past eight years.
“This puts Senate Democrats in a vulnerable position, while
threatening Republican’s control of the House as well as their
sizeable numerical advantage in the governorships across the country,”
writes Sosnik, who advised Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential
race and now does consulting work for a variety of private-sector
clients.
Obama neither directly campaigned nor raised money for down-ticket
Democrats last year. The post-election creation of Organizing for
Action to push his own agenda has upset party regulars because it
makes the Democratic National Committee less relevant than ever,
squeezes fundraising for other Democratic groups and emphasizes issues
that put moderates in a bind.
“Obama not only got elected by running against the party
establishment, but he has governed as a President who does not
emphasize his party label,” writes Sosnik. “It’s hard to be a change
agent if you are lugging around a party label in an era where voters
are so strongly disaffected from our institutions.”
These memos are read closely by an influential community of insiders
in the political and business worlds. In this one, Sosnik outlines
several challenges facing his own party:
• Obama’s personal popularity does not easily translate for other
candidates. The president is not building the Democratic Party’s
institutional apparatus in a way that it will thrive when he’s gone.
• The losses in the 2010 midterms gave Republicans control of the
redistricting process, which will be in effect until after the 2020
census. This gives the GOP a structural advantage in keeping the
House.
• Millennials, born 1981 to 1994, and Generation X’ers, born 1965 to
1980, are voting Democratic, but a plurality identify themselves as
independents — which makes them less reliable.
• Democrats cannot count on the same level of African-American turnout
without Obama at the top of the ticket. Sosnik cites new analysis
showing that in 2012 for the first time ever eligible black voters
turned out a higher rate than whites.
While Republicans have a serious Hispanic problem, Sosnik explains,
“younger Hispanics feel less of an allegiance to the Democratic Party
than their elders.” Only 50 percent of Hispanic voters aged 18-34
identify themselves as Democrats, according to Gallup, compared to 59
percent of Hispanic voters 55 or older.
If Hillary Clinton does not run, Sosnik fears that Democrats will be
left with a thin bench of top-flight presidential contenders in 2016.
Looking to 2014, Democratic base groups also tend to turn out at lower
rates for midterms than presidential elections.
In terms of actual policy making, Sosnik believes that it will be
“almost impossible” for Obama to effectively engage Congress.
“Obama’s victory last November was a great political achievement, but
the fact that he didn’t set out a clear policy agenda for a second
term left him without a clear mandate to govern over a politically
divided Congress,” he writes.
“Furthermore,” he writes, “there’s not a single member of either party
who fears paying a political price for not falling in line with the
President, making it even more difficult to get members to cast
difficult votes.”
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=E0701E42-C7C7-4396-848F-C296480B5A3A
+
Pucker your butt for the Apocalypse!
Johnny Asia, Asshole from the Future
http://johnnyasia.com/
"Democratic strategist: Party 'in decline'"
Politico: One of the Democrats’ most veteran strategists warns that
the party is “in decline” and “at considerable risk” when President
Barack Obama is no longer on the scene.
“Since Obama was elected President, the Democrats have lost nine
governorships, 56 members of the House and two Senate seats,” Doug
Sosnik, the political director in Bill Clinton’s White House, writes
in a new memo.
While Republican branding problems get the lion’s share of attention,
the Democratic Party’s favorability rating has declined by 15 points
since Obama took power. A Pew Research Center survey this January
showed that the Democratic Party was viewed favorably by 47 percent of
Americans, down from 62 percent in Jan. 2009.
With the likelihood of gridlock and near-record-low confidence in
public institutions, Sosnik expects 2014 to bring the fourth change
election in the past eight years.
“This puts Senate Democrats in a vulnerable position, while
threatening Republican’s control of the House as well as their
sizeable numerical advantage in the governorships across the country,”
writes Sosnik, who advised Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential
race and now does consulting work for a variety of private-sector
clients.
Obama neither directly campaigned nor raised money for down-ticket
Democrats last year. The post-election creation of Organizing for
Action to push his own agenda has upset party regulars because it
makes the Democratic National Committee less relevant than ever,
squeezes fundraising for other Democratic groups and emphasizes issues
that put moderates in a bind.
“Obama not only got elected by running against the party
establishment, but he has governed as a President who does not
emphasize his party label,” writes Sosnik. “It’s hard to be a change
agent if you are lugging around a party label in an era where voters
are so strongly disaffected from our institutions.”
These memos are read closely by an influential community of insiders
in the political and business worlds. In this one, Sosnik outlines
several challenges facing his own party:
• Obama’s personal popularity does not easily translate for other
candidates. The president is not building the Democratic Party’s
institutional apparatus in a way that it will thrive when he’s gone.
• The losses in the 2010 midterms gave Republicans control of the
redistricting process, which will be in effect until after the 2020
census. This gives the GOP a structural advantage in keeping the
House.
• Millennials, born 1981 to 1994, and Generation X’ers, born 1965 to
1980, are voting Democratic, but a plurality identify themselves as
independents — which makes them less reliable.
• Democrats cannot count on the same level of African-American turnout
without Obama at the top of the ticket. Sosnik cites new analysis
showing that in 2012 for the first time ever eligible black voters
turned out a higher rate than whites.
While Republicans have a serious Hispanic problem, Sosnik explains,
“younger Hispanics feel less of an allegiance to the Democratic Party
than their elders.” Only 50 percent of Hispanic voters aged 18-34
identify themselves as Democrats, according to Gallup, compared to 59
percent of Hispanic voters 55 or older.
If Hillary Clinton does not run, Sosnik fears that Democrats will be
left with a thin bench of top-flight presidential contenders in 2016.
Looking to 2014, Democratic base groups also tend to turn out at lower
rates for midterms than presidential elections.
In terms of actual policy making, Sosnik believes that it will be
“almost impossible” for Obama to effectively engage Congress.
“Obama’s victory last November was a great political achievement, but
the fact that he didn’t set out a clear policy agenda for a second
term left him without a clear mandate to govern over a politically
divided Congress,” he writes.
“Furthermore,” he writes, “there’s not a single member of either party
who fears paying a political price for not falling in line with the
President, making it even more difficult to get members to cast
difficult votes.”
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=E0701E42-C7C7-4396-848F-C296480B5A3A
+
Pucker your butt for the Apocalypse!
Johnny Asia, Asshole from the Future
http://johnnyasia.com/
0 new messages