Glad there are still Jittlov fans still looking at this board despite the spam
pestigor
That Woot thing was very "Jittlovian" for sure.
--
--------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Final
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
------------------- ----- ---- -- -
Reverend Fuzzy
> Just doing my part to keep this thing alive.
> That Woot thing was very "Jittlovian" for sure.
>
> --
> --------------------------------- --- -- -
> Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Final
> ------------------- ----- ---- -- -
As long as we keep posting, we'll be able to keep our
heads above water, in the river of spam.
--
Reverend Fuzzy
Hattiesburg, MS
http://www.msbminstries.org
wagewhore
Yeah!! Here's one more head above the water.. Time to declare open
season on spammers!
--
WageWhore
Walt
> Yeah!! Here's one more head above the water.. Time to declare open
> season on spammers!
Maybe we should move the discussion to somewhere a little more spammer-
proof. Like, a web-based forum or yahoo group or mailing list or
something where we can kick out a spammer.
Then we can spam a.f.m-j with "meet over here:" notices every week or
month.
Lord Vetinari
news:4b4dcb96-32bd-4b85...@d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
*******************************************
No. Bad idea. The level of spam is not huge, and I'm not signing up for
websites, or email lists.
If we posted more often, then the spam would seem trivial.
Walt
> If we posted more often, then the spam would seem trivial.
How do we get more people to do that?
cement...@gmail.com
pete
when MJ himself used to post here the number of other people posting
increased.
Also - when anyone found a Jittlov short and made it available the number
increased as well.
Oh heck - just asking people how we can get people to post more seems to
be doing it ;-)
--
Pete (who still has a signed WoSaT poster somewhere in his room that is
starting to resemble Mike's for the sheer volume of "stuff" it has
accumulated)
Lord Vetinari
news:00192aeb$0$2899$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:17:16 -0700, Walt wrote:
>
>> On Aug 11, 3:52 pm, "Lord Vetinari" <vetin...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>> If we posted more often, then the spam would seem trivial.
>>
>> How do we get more people to do that?
>
> when MJ himself used to post here the number of other people posting
> increased.
> Also - when anyone found a Jittlov short and made it available the number
> increased as well.
> Oh heck - just asking people how we can get people to post more seems to
> be doing it ;-)
YAY! Well....I'm still not giving up hope.
> Pete (who still has a signed WoSaT poster somewhere in his room that is
> starting to resemble Mike's for the sheer volume of "stuff" it has
> accumulated)
I'm really, really jealous.
Thin Theherd
> On Aug 1, 11:51 am, wagewhore <wagewh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah!! Here's one more head above the water.. Time to declare open
> > season on spammers!
>
> Maybe we should move the discussion to somewhere a little more spammer-
> proof.
You do realize that that would also effectively exclude the very
person for whom this group exists, don't you?
Like, a web-based forum or yahoo group or mailing list or
> something where we can kick out a spammer.
You can still start a Yahoo group for fans; nothing's stopping you.
Maybe some people would be interested in joining such a group and you
can also have the fun of censoring and kicking people out that you
don't like or wish to voice opinions that you don't share.
>
> Then we can spam a.f.m-j with "meet over here:" notices every week or
> month.
And that, in effect, would ironically make you a spammer, wouldn't it?