Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

How's Mike's mom doing?

4 views
Skip to first unread message

xganon

unread,
Aug 17, 2001, 12:54:10 PM8/17/01
to
How is Mike Jittlov's mother doing? I read where he posted back
in May that she was not doing well, does anybody have an update
on her condition or anywhere to send get well cards and/or flowers
and money?

---
This post was anonymized at http://www.xganon.com
Come visit the newest xganon server http://www.xganon.org providing
rights and freedom related news.
---


peeceersb...@hotmail.com

unread,
Aug 18, 2001, 3:03:37 PM8/18/01
to
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 9:54 AM, xganon <mailto:nob...@xganon.com> wrote:
>How is Mike Jittlov's mother doing? I read where he posted back
>in May that she was not doing well, does anybody have an update
>on her condition or anywhere to send get well cards and/or flowers
>and money?

I don't think Mike accepts charity. Also, you might want to think twice
about sending a cheesy "Hallmark" card to one of the most gifted and
creative individuals in Hollywood who also lists one of the reasons for
developing his incredibly small writing as "...it saves trees...", even if
it is for Marie. I think Mike will let us know what needs to be known if
and when he's ever ready.

However, Mike freely lists his address and phone number in any one of his
hudreds of Usenet posts in his sig.

dave

---------------------------------------------------------
Cyberdog ---A Product of Apple Computer, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------

Dave

unread,
Aug 26, 2001, 3:03:47 AM8/26/01
to
In article <B7A40A2...@10.0.1.4>, <peeceersb...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 9:54 AM, xganon <mailto:nob...@xganon.com> wrote:
> >How is Mike Jittlov's mother doing? I read where he posted back
> >in May that she was not doing well, does anybody have an update
> >on her condition or anywhere to send get well cards and/or flowers
> >and money?
>
> I don't think Mike accepts charity. Also, you might want to think twice
> about sending a cheesy "Hallmark" card to one of the most gifted and
> creative individuals in Hollywood who also lists one of the reasons for
> developing his incredibly small writing as "...it saves trees...", even if
> it is for Marie. I think Mike will let us know what needs to be known if
> and when he's ever ready.
>
> However, Mike freely lists his address and phone number in any one of his
> hudreds of Usenet posts in his sig.
>
> dave

You know, I read this reply a few days ago, and I've been getting more
and more pissed off thinking about it ever since. It's almost
unimagineably nasty and snobby, seething with venom in response to
someone posting a totally kind-hearted query. Sorry you're so angry and
rotton, dude...I'd imagine there's nothing I could say to make you
realize how beyond shitty your response was. So I'll speak to "xganon",
who posted in the first place.

Mike's address is Mike Jittlove, Church of the Creative Spirit, 902
North Maltman Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90026-2714 . Send him the
biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find. And sign it with a
heartfelt line or two. And be very confident that you'll touch both
Mike and his mom, who, like everyone else in this world, are probably
lonely a lot of the time and need to know people care. And don't ever,
ever stop giving a damn, no matter what the grinches say.

peeceersb...@hotmail.com

unread,
Aug 26, 2001, 3:24:23 PM8/26/01
to
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 12:03 AM, Dave <mailto:d...@d.com> wrote:
>In article <B7A40A2...@10.0.1.4>, <
>peeceersb...@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 9:54 AM, xganon <mailto:nob...@xganon.com> wrote:
>> >How is Mike Jittlov's mother doing? I read where he posted back
>> >in May that she was not doing well, does anybody have an update
>> >on her condition or anywhere to send get well cards and/or flowers
>> >and money?
>>
>> I don't think Mike accepts charity. Also, you might want to think twice
>> about sending a cheesy "Hallmark" card to one of the most gifted and
>> creative individuals in Hollywood who also lists one of the reasons for
>> developing his incredibly small writing as "...it saves trees...", even
if
>> it is for Marie. I think Mike will let us know what needs to be known if
>> and when he's ever ready.
>>
>> However, Mike freely lists his address and phone number in any one of
his
>> hudreds of Usenet posts in his sig.
>>
>> dave
>
>
>
>You know, I read this reply a few days ago, and I've been getting more
>and more pissed off thinking about it ever since.

Sounds like you might benefit from anger- management counseling, there,
pal.


It's almost
>unimagineably nasty and snobby, seething with venom in response to
>someone posting a totally kind-hearted query. Sorry you're so angry and
>rotton, dude...


The only "venom" around here seems to be yours.


I'd imagine there's nothing I could say to make you
>realize how beyond shitty your response was. So I'll speak to "xganon",
>who posted in the first place.

You're right on that point; there isn't anything you can say to make me
realize "how beyond shitty" my reply was because you are a hypocritical,
angry individual. Read on if you have the courage...

>
>Mike's address is Mike Jittlove, Church of the Creative Spirit, 902
>North Maltman Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90026-2714 . Send him the
>biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find. And sign it with a
>heartfelt line or two.

And that isn't being "nasty and snobby"? Read the title of this newsgroup.
This NG is for fans of Jittlov. His life and beliefs are largely exposed
via his writings and other creative works. Mike has stated he does not
accept charity. Mike has stated he is interested in "sav(ing) trees. Mike
also does not shake hands. I suppose that if "xganon" wanted to, you would
advocate that he also approach Mike on the street and give him an iron-
gripped, arm- pumping, teeth- chattering handshake, as well?

And be very confident that you'll touch both
>Mike and his mom, who, like everyone else in this world, are probably
>lonely a lot of the time and need to know people care. And don't ever,
>ever stop giving a damn, no matter what the grinches say.

Mike is constantly inundated with harrassing, immature, stalking, angry,
selfish and inconsiderate individuals such as yourself. Furthermore, he is
hardly lonely and "Send(ing) him the
biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find" only serves to make Hallmark
wealthier, destroy natural resources and give Mike more hassle of dealing
with said "big cheesy card" for recycling thus taking more time away from
caring from his mother.

You should think twice before flaming me or anyone else, you pompous
jackass.

Dave

unread,
Aug 26, 2001, 3:58:45 PM8/26/01
to
Heh. I'm pleased beyond measure at having successfully trolled out the
poison that in your original posting was thinly cloaked.

Stalked by greeting cards. Film at 11.

Oh, and...love your witty email address!

In article <B7AE9B0...@10.0.1.3>, <peeceersb...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

peeceersb...@hotmail.com

unread,
Aug 26, 2001, 5:33:39 PM8/26/01
to
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 12:58 PM, Dave <mailto:d...@d.com> wrote:
>Heh. I'm pleased beyond measure at having successfully trolled out the
>poison that in your original posting was thinly cloaked.

Yes, you are an effective troll... you must be proud.

>


I see you have not much to say about my actual rebuttal, though...eh? I
didn't think so. Your immaturity and selfishness that prohibit you from
admitting your errors is all too common nowadays.


>Stalked by greeting cards. Film at 11.
>

No, stalked by emotionally immature, self- centered individuals such as
yourself who think so grandly of your own insignificant lives that you are
"pissed off" when it is suggested that your intrusive and offensive
gestures won't make the recipient feel warm and fuzzy as you dellusionally
think it should. This is the exact profile of a stalker who fantasizes that
his or her, wedding proposals, homemade cookies, etc. will impress the
target. When the target fails to share the enthusiasm or is forced to ask
the stalker to cease with his or her missives, then the stalker becomes
enraged and escalates the offensive. This is clearly evident by your advice
to the original poster:

" Send him the
>> >biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find."

Gee, Dave, I thought the idea was to comfort the Jittlovs, not to attempt
to irritate and offend them or me by sending "the biggest, cheesiest card".
I guess your original focus sort of gets all "mixed up in your brain" just
about now, huh, Dave? What with all that anger building up inside of you (>


>You know, I read this reply a few days ago, and I've been getting more

> >and more pissed off thinking about it ever since. )?

Additionally, your quote of "> And be very confident that you'll touch both


> >Mike and his mom, who, like everyone else in this world, are probably
> >lonely a lot of the time and need to know people care. And don't ever,
> >ever stop giving a damn, no matter what the grinches say.

is also very revealing and indicative of your delusional thought process
similar to the stalker's. On what do you base this conjecture? It's
obviously not on your knowledge or consideration of the Jittlovs. No, my
delluded friend, it is called "projection". This is where you, indeed
probably "lonely a lot of the time" simply asign this quality to others in
an attempt to assuage your own inadequacies. Rest assured that "everyone
else in this world" is not lonely. Just you and a minority of other sad,
troubled individuals.

I implore you to seek professional help before we all read about you
killing some poor, innocent school girls or shoot up the office in which
you work.


>Oh, and...love your witty email address!
>

..if the shoe fits ; )

peeceersb...@hotmail.com

unread,
Aug 26, 2001, 5:48:25 PM8/26/01
to
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 12:58 PM, Dave <mailto:d...@d.com> wrote:
(bunch of senseless troll- baiting snipped because of idiocy)

This was my original response to the poster:

>> >> I don't think Mike accepts charity. Also, you might want to think
twice
>> >> about sending a cheesy "Hallmark" card to one of the most gifted and
>> >> creative individuals in Hollywood who also lists one of the reasons
for
>> >> developing his incredibly small writing as "...it saves trees...",
even
>> if
>> >> it is for Marie. I think Mike will let us know what needs to be known
if
>> >> and when he's ever ready.
>> >>
>> >> However, Mike freely lists his address and phone number in any one of
>> his
>> >> hudreds of Usenet posts in his sig.
>> >>
>> >> dave

There is nothing "venomous" about it. You have exposed yourself as self-
admitted troll, and I fell for it.

Mike treasures his privacy and spends way too much time answering or
sorting through inane, obtuse intrusions such as the kind you suggest.
Neither Mike or Marie are "lonely", as you fantasize. In fact, time spent
dealing with insensitive morons such as yourself, your petty needs and
easily- offended psyches keeps them from spending time with their real
friends- not self- imposed friends such as you.

Mike is an fervent environmentalist. He is caring for his sick mother whom
he loves very much. To advise another to pester them in ways known to be
offensive is incredibly rude, at best, and probably psychotic. You, sir,
are a boor and, as I correctly postulated in my first response to you, a
jackass.

If one is genuinely concerned for Mike and his mother's conditions, a truly
selfless act would be to anonomously donate to a stroke charity in Marie
Jittlov's name.

I've had it with you, self- professed troll. You have now offically made a
jackass of yourself and my services are no longer needed. Now go and be
lonely like "everyone else in the world"...someplace far from here and any
school yards, hopefully.

Alex Cain

unread,
Aug 27, 2001, 12:55:40 AM8/27/01
to
peeceersb...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Mike is constantly inundated with harrassing, immature, stalking, angry,
> selfish and inconsiderate individuals such as yourself.

You'd know this first-hand, I take it?

Alex Cain

unread,
Aug 27, 2001, 1:00:58 AM8/27/01
to

Attacking him right off the bat. Being a bit defensive aren't you?


>
> It's almost
> >unimagineably nasty and snobby, seething with venom in response to
> >someone posting a totally kind-hearted query. Sorry you're so angry and
> >rotton, dude...
>
> The only "venom" around here seems to be yours.

And yours.

>
> I'd imagine there's nothing I could say to make you
> >realize how beyond shitty your response was. So I'll speak to "xganon",
> >who posted in the first place.
>
> You're right on that point; there isn't anything you can say to make me
> realize "how beyond shitty" my reply was because you are a hypocritical,
> angry individual. Read on if you have the courage...

You're the one who is angry.


>
> >
> >Mike's address is Mike Jittlove, Church of the Creative Spirit, 902
> >North Maltman Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90026-2714 . Send him the
> >biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find. And sign it with a
> >heartfelt line or two.
>
> And that isn't being "nasty and snobby"?

No, it isn't. It's being human.


> Read the title of this newsgroup.

I believe he did.

> This NG is for fans of Jittlov.

Exactly.


> His life and beliefs are largely exposed
> via his writings and other creative works.

Yep.


> Mike has stated he does not
> accept charity.

So what? He could give the money to those who need it, like the Red
Cross or the poor.

> Mike has stated he is interested in "sav(ing) trees. Mike
> also does not shake hands. I suppose that if "xganon" wanted to, you would
> advocate that he also approach Mike on the street and give him an iron-
> gripped, arm- pumping, teeth- chattering handshake, as well?

Those who would not know him might do so.


>
> And be very confident that you'll touch both
> >Mike and his mom, who, like everyone else in this world, are probably
> >lonely a lot of the time and need to know people care. And don't ever,
> >ever stop giving a damn, no matter what the grinches say.
>
> Mike is constantly inundated with harrassing, immature, stalking, angry,
> selfish and inconsiderate individuals such as yourself.

You have first-hand knowledge, I take it?


>Furthermore, he is
> hardly lonely and "Send(ing) him the
> biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find" only serves to make Hallmark
> wealthier, destroy natural resources

News flash moron: The tree that made the card that's at Hallmark as I
type this IS ALREADY DEAD. The person purchasing the card won't be
"destroying natural resources." Also most politically correct companies
these days use synthetic fibers for such things as cards and paper so
that more of the environment can be preserved.

> and give Mike more hassle of dealing
> with said "big cheesy card" for recycling

But, if it's recycling, it's not difficult to drop the card
into a box or bin for that purpose. You are indeed an idiot.

> thus taking more time away from
> caring from his mother.

Oh yea like it'll take an eternity to recycle a single card. *roll*

>
> You should think twice before flaming me or anyone else, you pompous
> jackass.

Why's that? Are there two of you that are this stupid?

peeceersb...@hotmail.com

unread,
Aug 27, 2001, 3:57:39 AM8/27/01
to
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 10:00 PM, Alex Cain <mailto:alex...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Not exactly, asswipe. You conveniently left out parts of the previous
imbecile's ranting and misguided, immature rages.

>>
>> It's almost
>> >unimagineably nasty and snobby, seething with venom in response to
>> >someone posting a totally kind-hearted query. Sorry you're so angry and
>> >rotton, dude...
>>
>> The only "venom" around here seems to be yours.
>
>And yours.

And now yours, little man ;)


>> I'd imagine there's nothing I could say to make you
>> >realize how beyond shitty your response was. So I'll speak to "xganon",
>> >who posted in the first place.
>>
>> You're right on that point; there isn't anything you can say to make me
>> realize "how beyond shitty" my reply was because you are a hypocritical,
>> angry individual. Read on if you have the courage...
>
>You're the one who is angry.
>

D'oh. Can't put one over on you, huh, "Ace"? :)


>> >Mike's address is Mike Jittlove, Church of the Creative Spirit, 902
>> >North Maltman Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90026-2714 . Send him the
>> >biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find. And sign it with a
>> >heartfelt line or two.
>>
>> And that isn't being "nasty and snobby"?
>
>No, it isn't. It's being human.

And you and your dim- witted counterpart are prime examples of how the gene
pool has been watered down in our species.


>> Mike has stated he does not
>> accept charity.
>
>So what? He could give the money to those who need it, like the Red
>Cross or the poor.
>

"So what"? You're an asshole. The "so what" is that Mike has expressed he
doesn't accept charity. What part of that is lost on your feeble ganglion?

>
>> Mike has stated he is interested in "sav(ing) trees. Mike
>> also does not shake hands. I suppose that if "xganon" wanted to, you
would
>> advocate that he also approach Mike on the street and give him an iron-
>> gripped, arm- pumping, teeth- chattering handshake, as well?
>
>Those who would not know him might do so.
>

Right, oh flacid little interjector. That's what makes asshole number one's
reply so patently rude and immature. The original guy was asking if it was
right to do these things- you two pea- brains- in- a- pod are the precise
reason Mike suffers unnecessarilly. Why should Mike be forced to pass on
your charity money or go through the hassle of dedaling with your idiotic
greeting cards, you pompous, vapid, arrogant shit- for- brains? He's taking
care of his sick mother you flaming asshole.


>> And be very confident that you'll touch both
>> >Mike and his mom, who, like everyone else in this world, are probably
>> >lonely a lot of the time and need to know people care. And don't ever,
>> >ever stop giving a damn, no matter what the grinches say.
>>
>> Mike is constantly inundated with harrassing, immature, stalking, angry,
>> selfish and inconsiderate individuals such as yourself.
>
>You have first-hand knowledge, I take it?

Uh...yeah. Mike happens to be a neighbor and friend.

>
>>Furthermore, he is
>> hardly lonely and "Send(ing) him the
>> biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find" only serves to make
>Hallmark
>> wealthier, destroy natural resources
>
>News flash moron: The tree that made the card that's at Hallmark as I
>type this IS ALREADY DEAD. The person purchasing the card won't be
>"destroying natural resources." Also most politically correct companies
>these days use synthetic fibers for such things as cards and paper so
>that more of the environment can be preserved.

Wow...(shaking head in disbelief) you're a bigger asswipe than the last
guy. You don't understand the basic tenet of conservation, do you,
dickhead? It's "ALREADY DEAD" because simple jackasses such as yourself
lack the intellect to grasp the basic tenets of supply and demand: the less
people buying "big cheesy cards", the less "ALREADY DEAD TREES", you twit.

>> and give Mike more hassle of dealing
>> with said "big cheesy card" for recycling
>
>But, if it's recycling, it's not difficult to drop the card
>into a box or bin for that purpose. You are indeed an idiot.

You, just like your simple compatriot, lack the brain power to comprehend,
I see. It might "not difficult" for YOU to drop something into a recycling
bin, but are you the primary caregiver for an aged stroke victim? I might
be an idiot, but at least I have enough consideration to respect the man's
privacy and expressed wishes.

>
>> thus taking more time away from
>> caring from his mother.
>
>Oh yea like it'll take an eternity to recycle a single card. *roll*

You are a pompous, insignificant speck (see previous replies). Did you
torture cats or other animals when you were a lad, by any chance?


>> You should think twice before flaming me or anyone else, you pompous
>> jackass.
>
>Why's that? Are there two of you that are this stupid?
>

Okay, another lonely, flaming asshole dismissed...NEXT!!!!! 8^ P

Salt Of The Earth

unread,
Aug 27, 2001, 4:23:40 AM8/27/01
to
A friend of mine wrote to Mike. She was very surprised that he actually

called her back to talk to her. That to me says that Mike is
intelligent
enough to distinguish between someone who honestly cares and
some mad cyberstalker. The world is not as black and white as
some might believe.

Jason Rout

unread,
Aug 27, 2001, 7:16:50 AM8/27/01
to
Dave wrote:

> In article <B7A40A2...@10.0.1.4>, <peeceersb...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think Mike accepts charity.

Damn. Maybe I should call FedEx, and get them to stop delivery on that Norwegian
Supermodel I got on E-Bay.

...especially now that I think I forgot to put air holes in her crate. I wonder
if I claim insurance?


Clayton George

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 12:30:07 PM8/28/01
to
peeceersb...@hotmail.com wrote in message news:<B7AEBCC...@10.0.1.3>...
..................................SQUISH....................................
......yuck...who left this mess in Mike's newsgroup??
......reminds me of the time I went to a favorite theatre, a cherished
hall of wonders that had been a marvel to enter...only to find a big,
ugly, stinky mess on the floor, and a bad smell in the air.
...man, I hate finding crap like this in the Green Hall. ...sigh....

Alex Cain

unread,
Aug 28, 2001, 2:59:24 PM8/28/01
to
You are blocked from sending me e-mail again, and this post/e-mail was
reported to Earthlink abuse.

How is it 'not exactly?'


>You conveniently left out parts of the previous
> imbecile's ranting and misguided, immature rages.

I left nothing out. I responded to what was there.


>
> >>
> >> It's almost
> >> >unimagineably nasty and snobby, seething with venom in response to
> >> >someone posting a totally kind-hearted query. Sorry you're so angry and
> >> >rotton, dude...
> >>
> >> The only "venom" around here seems to be yours.
> >
> >And yours.
>
> And now yours, little man ;)

Nope.

>
>
> >> I'd imagine there's nothing I could say to make you
> >> >realize how beyond shitty your response was. So I'll speak to "xganon",
> >> >who posted in the first place.
> >>
> >> You're right on that point; there isn't anything you can say to make me
> >> realize "how beyond shitty" my reply was because you are a hypocritical,
> >> angry individual. Read on if you have the courage...
> >
> >You're the one who is angry.
> >
>
> D'oh. Can't put one over on you, huh, "Ace"? :)

Nope!


>
> >> >Mike's address is Mike Jittlove, Church of the Creative Spirit, 902
> >> >North Maltman Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90026-2714 . Send him the
> >> >biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find. And sign it with a
> >> >heartfelt line or two.
> >>
> >> And that isn't being "nasty and snobby"?
> >
> >No, it isn't. It's being human.
>
> And you and your dim- witted counterpart are prime examples of how the gene
> pool has been watered down in our species.

Wow. That's a lovely (f)lame.


>
> >> Mike has stated he does not
> >> accept charity.
> >
> >So what? He could give the money to those who need it, like the Red
> >Cross or the poor.
> >
>
> "So what"? You're an asshole.

No, that would be yourself. See, I don't feel the need to be an
inconsiderate, lame-assed coward pussy like yourself.

> The "so what" is that Mike has expressed he
> doesn't accept charity.

So he can give it to those who need it then. *shrug* Besides, I'm
sure he could use it for medical bills if he so desired.

>What part of that is lost on your feeble ganglion?

None of it, oh stupid one.

>
> >
> >> Mike has stated he is interested in "sav(ing) trees. Mike
> >> also does not shake hands. I suppose that if "xganon" wanted to, you
> would
> >> advocate that he also approach Mike on the street and give him an iron-
> >> gripped, arm- pumping, teeth- chattering handshake, as well?
> >
> >Those who would not know him might do so.
> >
>
> Right, oh flacid little interjector. That's what makes asshole number one's
> reply so patently rude and immature.

No, it doesn't.


> The original guy was asking if it was
> right to do these things- you two pea- brains- in- a- pod are the precise
> reason Mike suffers unnecessarilly.

"Suffers unnecessarily?" Oh so you're speaking for him now? Does he
know? He's posted here as himself, after all. I'm sure he doesn't need
an immature dickhead like yourself speaking for him in these matters.

> Why should Mike be forced to pass on
> your charity money or go through the hassle of dedaling with your idiotic
> greeting cards, you pompous, vapid, arrogant shit- for- brains?

Well it's obvious from your tone that if he does have to "be forced" to
deal with money or cards of concern, yours won't be among them.

> He's taking
> care of his sick mother you flaming asshole.

Yes, I know, motherfucker, and as a result, money or cards of support
would definitely help.


>
> >> And be very confident that you'll touch both
> >> >Mike and his mom, who, like everyone else in this world, are probably
> >> >lonely a lot of the time and need to know people care. And don't ever,
> >> >ever stop giving a damn, no matter what the grinches say.
> >>
> >> Mike is constantly inundated with harrassing, immature, stalking, angry,
> >> selfish and inconsiderate individuals such as yourself.
> >
> >You have first-hand knowledge, I take it?
>
> Uh...yeah. Mike happens to be a neighbor and friend.

Boy with neighbors like you, no wonder he's suffering so much.
Are you the one who keeps stealing his newspaper?

>
> >
> >>Furthermore, he is
> >> hardly lonely and "Send(ing) him the
> >> biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find" only serves to make
> >Hallmark
> >> wealthier, destroy natural resources
> >
> >News flash moron: The tree that made the card that's at Hallmark as I
> >type this IS ALREADY DEAD. The person purchasing the card won't be
> >"destroying natural resources." Also most politically correct companies
> >these days use synthetic fibers for such things as cards and paper so
> >that more of the environment can be preserved.
>
> Wow...(shaking head in disbelief) you're a bigger asswipe than the last
> guy.

Thanks!! :)


> You don't understand the basic tenet of conservation, do you,
> dickhead?

Well when dealing with someone as thick-headed as yourself, the "basic
tenet of conversation" really never comes into play.

> It's "ALREADY DEAD" because simple jackasses such as yourself
> lack the intellect to grasp the basic tenets of supply and demand: the less
> people buying "big cheesy cards", the less "ALREADY DEAD TREES", you twit.

And if less people ate food and starved to death, there'd be more for
the rest of us, right?

Geezus fuck you are so stupid.


>
> >> and give Mike more hassle of dealing
> >> with said "big cheesy card" for recycling
> >
> >But, if it's recycling, it's not difficult to drop the card
> >into a box or bin for that purpose. You are indeed an idiot.
>
> You, just like your simple compatriot, lack the brain power to comprehend,
> I see.

Aww...thanks!

> It might "not difficult" for YOU to drop something into a recycling
> bin, but are you the primary caregiver for an aged stroke victim?

Are YOU? Absolutely not.


> I might
> be an idiot,

There's no "might" about it.


> but at least I have enough consideration to respect the man's
> privacy and expressed wishes.

So does everyone else, but as he's a public figure, and has posted his
address publically, he has invited the cards, letters, and money that
comes his way. If he does not like that happening, he can post a
request ON HIS OWN for people not to do so.

>
> >
> >> thus taking more time away from
> >> caring from his mother.
> >
> >Oh yea like it'll take an eternity to recycle a single card. *roll*
>
> You are a pompous, insignificant speck (see previous replies)

And you're a shit-for-brains fuckhead. :)

> Did you
> torture cats or other animals when you were a lad, by any chance?

Only squirrels. And the occassional mice.


>
> >> You should think twice before flaming me or anyone else, you pompous
> >> jackass.
> >
> >Why's that? Are there two of you that are this stupid?
> >
>
> Okay, another lonely, flaming asshole dismissed...NEXT!!!!!

Dude, your ENTIRE REPLY has been nothing but "lonely flames."

peeceersb...@hotmail.com

unread,
Aug 30, 2001, 3:40:25 AM8/30/01
to
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 11:59 AM, Alex Cain <mailto:alex...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>You are blocked from sending me e-mail again,

NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAN NAH


and this post/e-mail was
>reported to Earthlink abuse.

LOL- if you can't stand the heat...

peeceersb...@hotmail.com

unread,
Aug 30, 2001, 4:49:52 AM8/30/01
to
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 11:59 AM, Alex Cain <mailto:alex...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

this post/e-mail was
>reported to Earthlink abuse.

Oh, and don't forget abuse@navix,net, too ; )

Alex Cain

unread,
Aug 30, 2001, 3:56:42 PM8/30/01
to
peeceersb...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 11:59 AM, Alex Cain <mailto:alex...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >You are blocked from sending me e-mail again,
>
> NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAN

A bit pissed off, are we? Tough turkeys.

>
> and this post/e-mail was
> >reported to Earthlink abuse.
>
> LOL- if you can't stand the heat...

I can "stand the heat" just fine. But it's obvious you're a one-sided
moron who can't hold an intelligible conversation.

Scott

unread,
Sep 28, 2001, 6:28:42 AM9/28/01
to
I visited this thread, because I am aware that Mike's mom has been
ill, for some time, and am, sincerely, interested in knowing her
condition. These arguments are very insensitive, as Mike is surely
reading them. Anyone, who isn't a close, personal friend of Mike's,
who asumes they know what he wants to hear, from others, shouldn't
comment. I don't know what Mike would or wouldn't want to receive,
from his fans, and neither do any of you. As long as you're truly
acting from your heart, do what you feel is right.
0 new messages