Why dont M&B verify this stuff? It would take Ted 10 seconds to look up.
Fugu
Jay Smith
wrote:
>http://www.snopes.com/disney/parks/hearse.asp
No kidding! I would think they would have Snopes up all of the time
but I guess not.
Jay
www.fantasydragracing.homestead.com
www.deltabluesfestival.net
*****
If you should see me walking
Through your dreams at night
Would you please direct me
Where I ought to be
I've been looking for a crystal ball
To shed the light
To find a future in me...
*****
Carrie
that could be easily disputed from snopes that people send out, I
would be almost rich.
Carrie
On Jul 17, 8:21 am, Jay Smith <Rollou...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Fugu <fugu...@gmail.com>
Fugu
> If I had a nickel (or maybe a dollar) for every email I've received
> that could be easily disputed from snopes that people send out, I
> would be almost rich.
>
> Carrie
I've found that I have to check multiple sites. Snopes isn't always
accurate or complete.
As an example, they state this email is true:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
Pay attention to the part in the email that claims, "You will submit
to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing".
Since they distinctly said the email was TRUE, then it is understood
that the entire email is true. Otherwise they'd state MIXTURE, MIXTURE
OF TRUE AND FALSE INFORMATION (both of which are used on the site).
But when you scroll down and read further it says, "Contrary to the
example e-mail quoted above, the bill would not require applicants to
'submit to a physical and mental evaluation at any time of their
choosing'"
Since I heard the hearse rumor before and checked into it, I knew
Snopes was right on this one.