> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:21:11 -0500, "Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake>
> wrote:
>
>>Fred Hall
>
> Is still posting through DataBasix, and you aren't, Neal. Why is
> that?
With any luck he'll re-run his long litany of claims of "victimization"
that resulted in his being thrown off the server. Much amusement.
> --
>
> "We should have just "leased" them so they could be
> returned back to Africa..." Dishonest John giving his
> opinion of African-Americans in Message-ID:
> <8pSdnRjCUvEePZXW...@centurytel.net>
"Greg" is a big fan of HJ. They share many common beliefs.
--
"" The "pros" use viewers that dig right down to the serial number,
where it was purchased and if a credit card was used or a warranty card
filled out, who purchased it."
Some stupid fuck in MID:heuf5e$qgl$1...@undertow.eternal-september.org
IAWTP !!
--
John C.
Need another spnak eh splooge?
http://www.textfiles.com/uploads/diz-usp3.txt
QUOTE:~
~
The newer your digital camera is, the less privacy you have. Newer
cameras leak everything from serial numbers to even the GPS
coordinates of the camera's location when the photo was taken. Though
don't worry, older cameras still leak plenty of metadata as well,
ranging from the camera's model to the date the photo was taken.
Photo Exif data became hot news a little while back, when it was
discovered that the person who uploaded photos of the seventh Harry
Potter book didn't bother to clean out the Exif data
(http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/boo
ks/article2104250.ece?print=yes), thus leading to the discovery of
the camera's serial number. If z had ever bothered to register the
camera, or had ever sent the camera in for repairs or upgrades, then
zir name and address would be easily traceable. Good thing that zir
camera didn't have the geolocation capability ;).
/Evans edit - "name and address" or paid for by credit card
Wrapping Up
If it isn't fucking obvious by now, metadata is highly dangerous. If
you're not careful it can lead not only to potentially embarrassing
situations but can also be used as forensic evidence against you for
whatever reason. The least possible course of action you should
undertake, particularly if you're pressed for time, is the outright
deletion of all available metadata in your files. If, on the other
hand, you have some time to kill, it would behoove you to go ahead
and forge all of the data to your advantage. Make it look like you
used a different camera, operating system, and software application
on a different date at different time.
~
ROFL at splooge.
--
Master of Puppets Be proud of what's in your trousers
DENSA Life Achievement � Am I the only one with half a brain?
You know something? (That was a rhetorical question, you clearly don't
know squat.)
You've provided me with one of the most useful .sig file quotes ever. I
can use it to reply to probably 40% of your posts and remain on topic
while making you look more the fool with each post.