LSQG (tm) - Thursday, 5/5/MMXI #3486
Alan Page
#3486
~From New York~
"...the greatest city in the world..."
~Opening List~
Jodie Foster
Tom Dreesen
Neon Trees
"And now...high-functioning sociopath...Dave Letterman"
~Monologue~
I Wonder If That Joke Would Be Funnier In Spanish?
I Wonder If That Joke Would Be Funnier In Spanish?
~CB~
Desk Chat
Dave's Mom
TTL - Letterman Family Mother's Day Traditions
~CB~
Jodie Foster (Panel)
BSH
~CB~
Jodie Foster (Panel)
~CB~
Coggie, Behave!
~CB~
Tom Dreesen (Panel)
~CB~
Neon Trees (Music)
"I like boating"
--
Alan
~WWWWW~
What a Wonderful Web We Weave
dsi...@yahoo.com
> Tom Dreesen (Panel)
Always good to see Dreesen is as funny as ever.
--Dave Sikula
Jess Band-EE-Coot
On a scale of 1 to 10, exactly how funny is he?
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Girls who put out are tramps. Girls who don't are ladies.
This is, however, a rather archaic usage of the word.
Should one of you boys happen upon a girl who doesn't put out,
do not jump to the conclusion that you have found a lady.
What you have probably found is a lesbian.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Alan Page
"Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
> On a scale of 1 to 10, exactly how funny is he?
Whoosh.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> "Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
>> On a scale of 1 to 10, exactly how funny is he?
>
> Whoosh.
>
I got the sarcasm. Whoosh yourself.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
>> On a scale of 1 to 10, exactly how funny is he?
>
> Whoosh.
>
I got the sarcasm. Whoosh yourself.
R H Draney
>
>On 5/6/2011 12:23 PM, Alan Page wrote:
> > "Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
> >> On a scale of 1 to 10, exactly how funny is he?
> >
> > Whoosh.
> >
>
>I got the sarcasm. Whoosh yourself.
Repeating material again, I see....r
--
Me? Sarcastic?
Yeah, right.
randwill
"Alan Page" <alp...@spamsucceed.net> wrote in message
news:92hc8i...@mid.individual.net...
That monologue wasn't any funnier on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday. Less so
the fourth time around.
Another of those telling moments; when Dave was talking to Jodie Foster
about Mel Gibson's problems and the audience was laughing at the end of his
every sentence. Dave says, "I don't know why they're laughing...", when, in
fact, he knows that's what they've been commanded to do.
Dreesen - has it been a year already?
I thought Neon Trees were pretty good, maybe just compared to Wednesday
night's act. I wondered who the kids who made up the chorus were and was
disappointed Dave didn't ask.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> Repeating material again, I see....r
>
>
If Dave can, why can't I?
I'm not even get paid!
Twibil
You *can*.
Nobody here wants to interfere with your right to paint yourself blue
with pink polka-dots and stand in Times Square shouting "BUSH BLEW UP
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER!!" if that's what turns your crank. And what
with freedom of speech and all that, it's good odds that no black
helicopters will wind up hovering above your home at 2:00 AM as a
result.
But what you find unnattractive about Dave's comedy routines appears
even less attractive when coming from someone who's more and more
becoming an obsessive one-note-samba on a subject that's already been
covered extensively, is ultimately pointless -because it can have no
effect other than to make you feel better- and which you, unlike Dave,
do not get paid for.
> I'm not even get paid!
Yes. Exactly.
So in Dave's case we have two factors: (A) like all comedians he
repeats his successful comedy routines over and over, and (B) he gets
paid *very* well for doing so. So it's easy for most of us to
understand *why* he repeats jokes.
In your case we have only one factor: You *aren't* a very well paid
comedian, yet you keep repeating the same pointless -and humorless-
riff over and over again.
See the difference?
What's understandable -if not laudatory- behavior in a professional
performer is *not* understandable when it comes from someone who is
not.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
And what's even more of a turn-off are continual lectures
from a group that seems to think it's shit don't stink.
I'll carry on with my opinions on Dave.
Don't read 'em if you don't want to.
DTSmith
>
> And what's even more of a turn-off are continual lectures
> from a group that seems to think it's shit don't stink.
>
> I'll carry on with my opinions on Dave.
> Don't read 'em if you don't want to.
>
He should talk, eh Jess?
R H Draney
>
>
>And what's even more of a turn-off are continual lectures
>from a group that seems to think it's shit don't stink.
I don't look for advice to someone who throws apostrophes around where they
don't belong....r
Twibil
>
>
> And what's even more of a turn-off are continual lectures
> from a group that seems to think it's shit don't stink.
The logical fallacy you're making here is the assumption that because
"A" is false then "Z" must be true, without considering that there
were all those other letters in between. Example: creationists like to
pretend that if they can cast doubt on Darwin then it proves that
Biblical Creationism *must* be true. (It doesn't; even if they could.
Because those aren't the only two possibilities.)
And, as I was careful to point out, you're free to do whatever you
like.
But I can assure you that while our collective shit does indeed stink,
pretending that that entitles you to serve yours here as a regular
entree isn't going to sell you many meals.
> I'll carry on with my opinions on Dave.
> Don't read 'em if you don't want to.
If you'd stop compulsively inserting the "Dave's not living up to the
expectations I'm entitled to" bit into unrelated threads then it
wouldn't be a problem.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> Jess Band-EE-Coot filted:
>>
>>
>> And what's even more of a turn-off are continual lectures
>>from a group that seems to think it's shit don't stink.
>
> I don't look for advice to someone who throws apostrophes around where they
> don't belong....r
>
>
Einstein couldn't spell. Your loss.
Steve Curtis
>R H Draney wrote:
>>Jess Band-EE-Coot filted:
>>>And what's even more of a turn-off are
>>>continual lectures from a group that
>>>seems to think it's shit don't stink.
>>I don't look for advice to someone who
>>throws apostrophes around where they
>>don't belong....r
>Einstein couldn't spell. Your loss.
He did spell out E = mc²
R H Draney
>
>On 5/6/2011 4:59 PM, R H Draney wrote:
>> Jess Band-EE-Coot filted:
>>>
>>>
>>> And what's even more of a turn-off are continual lectures
>>>from a group that seems to think it's shit don't stink.
>>
>> I don't look for advice to someone who throws apostrophes around where they
>> don't belong....r
>>
>>
>
>Einstein couldn't spell. Your loss.
Einstein, however, could do other things....r
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> Jess Band-EE-Coot filted:
>>
>> On 5/6/2011 4:59 PM, R H Draney wrote:
>>> Jess Band-EE-Coot filted:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And what's even more of a turn-off are continual lectures
>>> >from a group that seems to think it's shit don't stink.
>>>
>>> I don't look for advice to someone who throws apostrophes around where they
>>> don't belong....r
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Einstein couldn't spell. Your loss.
>
> Einstein, however, could do other things....r
>
>
It's a really weak argument to resort to criticizing an apostrophe.
But that's what you folks do around here;
skirt the real issues and argue semantics.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
That looks like another lecture to me.
Two for two.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
I haven't told anyone what they should or shouldn't talk about.
It's a Letterman group ... last I checked.
If I want to criticize the subject of the group,
that would appear to be on topic.
Not really my problem if some are tired of hearing it.
Alan Page
"Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
> It's a Letterman group ... last I checked.
> If I want to criticize the subject of the group,
> that would appear to be on topic.
The group is alt.*FAN*.letterman...last I checked.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> "Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
>> It's a Letterman group ... last I checked.
>> If I want to criticize the subject of the group,
>> that would appear to be on topic.
>
> The group is alt.*FAN*.letterman...last I checked.
>
Oh, of course. Did you name it that yourself?
Pay for the server space, do you?
Twibil
>
>
> But that's what you folks do around here;
> skirt the real issues and argue semantics.
Okay, here's the real issue:
You're suffering from OCD, you're subjecting the rest of us to the
results, and it's not getting better.
Twibil
>
>
> That looks like another lecture to me.
Every child's excuse for tuning out unwanted information: "It's a
lecture". (Heck, I used to use that one myself.)
In it's classsic form it's followed shortly by putting your fingers in
your ears, closing your eyes, jumping up and down in one spot, and
yelling "NYAH! - NYAHH! - NYAHH! I - CAN'T - HEEEEEAR - YOU!!"
So when may we expect the rest of the performance?
Alan Page
"Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
> Oh, of course. Did you name it that yourself?
No. But I am literate.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> "Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
>> Oh, of course. Did you name it that yourself?
>
> No. But I am literate.
>
If literate = a pompous ass kisser, agreed.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Nothing is stopping you from putting me on "ignore", Chauncey.
It's a newsgroup. People post stuff. Rinse and repeat.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Yawn.
You and your little team of grammar police are just making things much
worse. Keep baiting me, keep lecturing, and keep policing what I have to
say about Dave. It isn't going to stop me from speaking out when I want to.
When I posted a fun topic entitled "A Positive Late Show Thread" about
two months ago, did you participate? Did Don Giller?
Did Alan? Of course not -- why acknowledge when I'm *not* criticizing
the show? That would weaken your argument. "Jess doesn't blindly love
everything Dave does!!! Get her out of here!! This is for FANS only!!"
The tiny remaining core of "regulars" here still think they own the
place. Well, get used to me or hit the "ignore" button.
johnny bobby bee
> No. But I am literate.
LOL! Oh no you didn't.
--
What you don't know can hurt you, only you won't know it.
Alan Page
"johnny bobby bee" wrote...
> LOL! Oh no you didn't.
Snap!
Alan Page
"Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
> everything Dave does!!! Get her out of here!! This is for FANS only!!"
Nobody ever said it was for "FANS only."
The group name has "fan" within it.
I suppose it's easy to go to this place to stir up trouble.
Going to alt.fan.jay-leno you'd get little reaction.
> The tiny remaining core of "regulars" here still think they own the place.
> Well, get used to me or hit the "ignore" button.
I don't have an "ignore" button...it's a blocked senders list.
I do "ignore" a very large percentage of your posts.
When I do respond, it's because I'm bored.
johnny bobby bee
> "johnny bobby bee" wrote...
>> LOL! Oh no you didn't.
>
> Snap!
>
Word.
johnny bobby bee
> I do "ignore" a very large percentage of your posts.
>
> When I do respond, it's because I'm bored.
Aww snap. Ouch, though.
You must be really bored today.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> "Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
>> everything Dave does!!! Get her out of here!! This is for FANS only!!"
>
> Nobody ever said it was for "FANS only."
>
> The group name has "fan" within it.
>
> I suppose it's easy to go to this place to stir up trouble.
>
> Going to alt.fan.jay-leno you'd get little reaction.
>
>> The tiny remaining core of "regulars" here still think they own the
place.
>> Well, get used to me or hit the "ignore" button.
>
> I don't have an "ignore" button...it's a blocked senders list.
>
> I do "ignore" a very large percentage of your posts.
>
> When I do respond, it's because I'm bored.
>
I know quite a bit about Letterman, and I've been watching LN (and then
LS) for 25+ years. I think that qualifies me as a "fan". Maybe I'm not a
FANATIC, in that I don't love *everything* Mr. Letterman does. I suspect
you don't either, but for whatever political reasons you choose not to
express that here.
In any case, *most* of my posts are on-topic. Maybe a majority aren't
glowing, blubbering "Dave is great!" posts, but they are typically about
the *show*. The only time that gets sidetracked is when people start
complaining about grammar or punctuation, or that the content is not
positive enough for their liking.
Keep in mind, from day one I've never been made to feel welcome by
anyone here except Sally. You flaunt your inside jokes and your cliques,
and your DaveCon stories, and all of that is a huge turn-off to
outsiders. Turn the mirror on yourselves once in a while. Many of you
have acted extremely condescending and quite arrogant, often pointing
out your intellectual superiority over me. I don't have a PhD. Never
really wanted one. I'm just a Harley-ridin' carpet muncher who works on
a silly morning show & plays bass in a punk band. Believe it or not,
Dave has always been one of my biggest heroes. Maybe I'm just dreaming
that he'll go out on top, instead of what the show has been reduced to
over the last five years. However, a true fan rides out the peaks and
valleys. This is just a valley, hopefully.
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Did you ever once show me any kind of friendship?
Ask my help with a personal problem?
Include me in one of your little bull sessions?
Can you imagine what it feels like to walk by this tent
and hear you laughing and know... that I'm not welcome?
Did you ever once offer me a lousy cup of coffee?"
-- Major Margaret Houlihan "M*A*S*H" ("The Nurses")
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Donz5
>Keep in mind, from day one I've never been made to feel welcome by
>anyone here except Sally.
I think it was when, from day one, you referred to everyone here as
lemmings or ass-fucks or simpletons or whatever other tired cliches
you could come up with that pretty much shied most of us away from
you.
And when you returned, your desperate cries for attention, repeatedly
posting my full name in a pitiful attempt to generate a response (done
again just today), only served to remind everyone why you were
unwelcome in here in the first place.
No one's stopping you from your childish behavior, but maybe you'll
eventually realize that most of us here aren't responding to you not
because you think you've built a solid foundation of mature argument
but rather because they understand what a colossal waste of energy
it'll be, knowing that all they'll receive in return are more juvenile
insults.
And, no, this isn't a dialogue, so whatever pearls of wisdom you
choose to share in response to this post will be met with silence.
randwill
"Alan Page" <alp...@spamsucceed.net> wrote in message
news:92k06g...@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote...
>> It's a Letterman group ... last I checked.
>> If I want to criticize the subject of the group,
>> that would appear to be on topic.
>
> The group is alt.*FAN*.letterman...last I checked.
>
> --
>
>
> Alan
I believe fans can criticize those they are fans of. In fact, who better?
It's alt.fan.letterman, not alt.sycophant.letterman.
Donz5
See Sikula, Dake, and countless others who have been here for years
and have criticized the show. Why are they respected and Jesse not?
Because they're adults.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Sorry you feel that way, Don.
Again, turn the mirror toward yourself once in a blue moon.
You have never extended an olive branch. Ever.
--
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Sorry you feel that way, Don.
Again, turn the mirror toward yourself once in a blue moon.
You have never extended an olive branch. Ever.
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Sorry you feel that way, Don.
Again, turn the mirror toward yourself once in a blue moon.
You have never extended an olive branch. Ever.
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
R H Draney
>
>Sorry you feel that way, Don.
>Again, turn the mirror toward yourself once in a blue moon.
>You have never extended an olive branch. Ever.
I think it's hilarious that the Universe, or karma, or the Tao, or whatever, has
singled out you of all people to make it look like you post every message three
times....r
Boston_Bill
Wow sounds like major jealousy going on and I dont dismiss you as some
troll but dont say we're all some fanatics who sees
nothing wrong with the show.
Im not ashamed of any friendships I have formed in this group. Sorry
if you're so insecure you can't handle it.
Bill
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Judging from these hostile responses, it's obvious no one here wants to
make an effort so why should I?
--
Twibil
>
>
> Judging from these hostile responses, it's obvious no one here wants to
> make an effort so why should I?
Yep. Everything is always somebody else's fault.
lpfeffa
Mostly yours, I'm guessing. ;-)
-- Lucy
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Coming from someone whose biggest claim to adulthood is amassing &
hording VHS tapes of every single David Letterman broadcast ever made,
I'd say you have some growing up to do, as well.
What is missing from *your* life that your entire existence revolves
around the worship of a talk show host?
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> Because they're adults.
You *really* want to go there, Don?
Coming from someone whose biggest claim to adulthood is amassing &
hording VHS tapes of every single David Letterman broadcast ever made,
I'd say you have a lot of growing up to do, as well.
How much is missing from *your* life that your entire social life
revolves around the worship of a fading talk show host?
You are a textbook example of "Man Child".
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Respect is a two way street, cowboy.
Sally
This is a horrible thread. Happy Mother's Day to everybody. Hot in
here, isn't it? Good time to ask if we should create an a.f.l.
anthem...I haven't participated, but I still feel like I have scratch
marks all over my arms just from reading.
Sally
Twibil
>
>
> >> Judging from these hostile responses, it's obvious no one here wants to
> >> make an effort so why should I?
>
> > Yep. Everything is always somebody else's fault.
>
> Mostly yours, I'm guessing. ;-)
Well, God knows I try, Lucy!
I've been behind international stagflation, pollution, extraordinary
rendition, religious discontent, the Jews, the Masonic Temple, the Tea
Party, global warming and white slavery for decades now; and I figure
it's about time I got a little credit!
(Blows a kiss)
Twibil
>
>
> >> Judging from these hostile responses, it's obvious no one here wants to
> >> make an effort so why should I?
>
> > Yep. Everything is always somebody else's fault.
>
> Respect is a two way street, cowboy.
If you honestly believe that's so, then how come you're the one crying
that you get no respect when -so far as it's possible to tell-
nobody here cares whether you respect them or not?
Twibil
>
>
> This is a horrible thread. Happy Mother's Day to everybody. Hot in
> here, isn't it? Good time to ask if we should create an a.f.l.
> anthem...I haven't participated, but I still feel like I have scratch
> marks all over my arms just from reading.
Hon, sometimes it's best to get these things out in the open;
uncomfortable though it is.
lpfeffa
Are you responsible for Will Ferrell's career?
-- Lucy
Twibil
And Adam Sandler's too!
(If you're gonna be evil, why stop halfway?)
R H Draney
>
>On May 8, 11:16=A0am, lpfeffa <lpfe...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Judging from these hostile responses, it's obvious no one here wants t=
>o
>> >> make an effort so why should I?
>>
>>
>> Mostly yours, I'm guessing. =A0;-)
>
>Well, God knows I try, Lucy!
>
>I've been behind international stagflation, pollution, extraordinary
>rendition, religious discontent, the Jews, the Masonic Temple, the Tea
>Party, global warming and white slavery for decades now; and I figure
>it's about time I got a little credit!
>
>(Blows a kiss)
This would be where you add "pleased to meet you, hope you guessed my name"....r
Alan Page
"Sally" wrote...
> This is a horrible thread. Happy Mother's Day to everybody.
I go away to spend Mother's Day Eve with my mother, spend Sunday at AT&T
Park watching the Giants shutout the Colorado Rockies whilst sweeping the
weekend series and afl remains the same.
Twibil
>
>
> >I've been behind international stagflation, pollution, extraordinary
> >rendition, religious discontent, the Jews, the Masonic Temple, the Tea
> >Party, global warming and white slavery for decades now; and I figure
> >it's about time I got a little credit!
>
> >(Blows a kiss)
>
> This would be where you add "pleased to meet you, hope you guessed my name"....r
(Blush) As a Blues musician I should probably have thought of that,
but I never was much of a Stones fan.
Besides; selling your soul to the Devil at a crossroads at midnight
plays hell with one's memory.
Which reminds me of a joke.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A great Blues-Harp player passes on and (surprise!) wakes up in
Heaven.
Saint Pete says "Welcome to the band, my son! We've got the best
Blues Band in eternity, and we'd like you to play in it!"
"Cool!" says the player; "But I thought that we all ended up down
below in Fiddler's Green?"
"Naw", says Pete. "I'm producing, we've got Lady Gay and Janis Joplin
singing harmony leads, Robert Johnson's on guitar, and Max Roach is on
drums, among others. Would you like to sit in?"
"You bet!" says the harp player, and makes sure he shows up on time
for the first practise session.
Everybody is about ready to go when this long-haired young guy wearing
a black cowboy hat shows up, uncases a Strat with the initials "SRV"
engraved in the pickguard, and starts tuning up.
"Wow!", says the harp player to Saint Peter, "Stevie Ray Vaughan! You
didn't tell me that you had him up here too!"
"Well, not quite," says Saint Pete. "That's actually Jesus.
He just *thinks* he's Stevie Ray Vaughan."
R H Draney
>
>Late Show Quick Guide - Thursday, 5/5/MMXI
>
>#3486
>~From New York~
>"...the greatest city in the world..."
>~Opening List~
>Jodie Foster
>Tom Dreesen
>Neon Trees
>"And now...high-functioning sociopath...Dave Letterman"
>~Monologue~
>I Wonder If That Joke Would Be Funnier In Spanish?
>I Wonder If That Joke Would Be Funnier In Spanish?
>~CB~
>Desk Chat
>Dave's Mom
>TTL - Letterman Family Mother's Day Traditions
>~CB~
>Jodie Foster (Panel)
>BSH
>~CB~
>Jodie Foster (Panel)
>~CB~
>Coggie, Behave!
>~CB~
>Tom Dreesen (Panel)
>~CB~
>Neon Trees (Music)
>"I like boating"
Jodie Foster note: I was working for American Express when the "do you know me?"
ad campaign morphed into the "My American Express" program...that's where they
got big pictures of famous people--actors, musicians, writers, athletes,
political big names--and printed them like posters along with some text about
how having an American Express card benefited even someone recognizable and
important...the portraits were all shot by Annie Liebowitz, and because I was in
the company I got some internal literature that interviewed her about the
experience of photographing all these famous faces for an ad campaign....
They asked if anyone had been difficult to work with, and she singled out Jodie
Foster as a challenge...not, I hasten to point out, because she was
uncooperative or anything like that, but because every prop or background Annie
tried to set her up with, she'd morph completely into whatever character the
gimmick suggested...she said she couldn't get a picture out of Foster that gave
any insight into her own soul because her personality was completely submerged
into the role she took on from the scenery....r
Twibil
>
>
> They asked if anyone had been difficult to work with, and she singled out Jodie
> Foster as a challenge...not, I hasten to point out, because she was
> uncooperative or anything like that, but because every prop or background Annie
> tried to set her up with, she'd morph completely into whatever character the
> gimmick suggested...she said she couldn't get a picture out of Foster that gave
> any insight into her own soul because her personality was completely submerged
> into the role she took on from the scenery....r
That being the case, I hate to think what she may have taken away from
her recent work with Mel Gibson -who she claims to respect...
Oog.
R H Draney
>
>On May 9, 12:18=A0am, R H Draney <dadoc...@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> They asked if anyone had been difficult to work with, and she singled out=
> Jodie
>> Foster as a challenge...not, I hasten to point out, because she was
> Annie
>> tried to set her up with, she'd morph completely into whatever character =
>the
>> gimmick suggested...she said she couldn't get a picture out of Foster tha=
>t gave
>> any insight into her own soul because her personality was completely subm=
>erged
>> into the role she took on from the scenery....r
>
>That being the case, I hate to think what she may have taken away from
>her recent work with Mel Gibson -who she claims to respect...
>
>Oog.
Maybe she got to keep the puppet....r
Jess Band-EE-Coot
It's a "Doctor, it hurts when I do *this*" situation;
if she's getting lost in the props,
then don't give her the props.
Sounds like it was Liebowitz's fault, not Foster's.
Boston_Bill
What amazes me is this thread has continued over one person's dislike
of us or not
feeling welcome. I say let's get over it and grow the fuck up.
Bill
Twibil
>
>
> What amazes me is this thread has continued over one person's dislike
> of us or not
> feeling welcome. I say let's get over it and grow the fuck up.
Free hint, Bill: posting annoying insults of your own is not a likely
way to end a thread.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
I think he was saying "let's" as in "Let US" meaning YOU.
A two-way street. Mutual moving on -- for everyone.
Twibil
>
>
> >> What amazes me is this thread has continued over one person's dislike
> >> of us or not
> >> feeling welcome. I say let's get over it and grow the fuck up.
>
> > Free hint, Bill: posting annoying insults of your own is not a likely
> > way to end a thread.
>
> I think he was saying "let's" as in "Let US" meaning YOU.
Yes, I'm quite sure you thought that.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
Good work snipping the rest of my comment, doofus.
The part that said "all of us move on".
You're good like that.