1. Stories about Dave's Life: 4.71 / 5 (94.20%)
2. Cold Openings: 4.53 / 5 (90.60%)
3. Biff Henderson Remote Segments: 4.31 / 5 (86.20%)
4. Stunts on 53rd St (objects off the roof, Mark Odgers, etc):
4.29 5(85.80%)
5. Tie:
Johnny Dark Characters: 4.05 / 5 (81.00%)
Alan Kalter segments: 4.05 / 5 (81.00%)
6. Will It Float?: 3.95 / 5 (79.00%)
7. Rupert Jee & Hello Deli (Psychic Sandwich, etc.): 3.90 / 5 (78.00%)
8. Stump The Band: 3.86 / 5 (77.20%)
9. Stand Up Comics: 3.83 / 5 (76.60%)
10. Know Your Current Events: 3.79 / 5 (75.80%)
11. Tie:
Dave's Monologue: 3.78 / 5 (75.60%)
Movie & TV Star Guest: 3.78 / 5 (75.60%)
12. Audience Questions (Who Asked for It, Let's Talk About the
Candidates, etc): 3.72 / 5 (74.40%)
13. Fun Facts: 3.67 / 5 (73.40%)
14. Sports Stars: 3.48 / 5 (69.60%)
15. Musical Guests: 3.45 / 5 (69.00%)
16. Tie:
Remotes featuring Jamba Juice: 3.40 / 5 (68.00%)
Sue Hum Interrupts Dave: 3.40 / 5 (68.00%)
17. Video Clips: 3.34 / 5 (66.80%)
18. Andy Kindler Remote Segments: 3.28 / 5 (65.60%)
Thanks. This is okay but "Jeff" in another survey results thread made
it even easier to understand. This is what he did:
<Here are your data presented in a different
way that should look OK for most of us.
1) Cold Openings
1: 0 (0.00%)
2: 3 (5.17%)
3: 4 (6.90%)
4: 10 (17.24%)
5: 41 (70.69%)
Responses: 58
Average Score: 4.53 / 5 (90.60%) <
I can understand that format a lot better.
Maybe...not so confused anymore!
Interesting that Kalter and Dark tied, though.
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Did you ever once show me any kind of friendship?
Ask my help with a personal problem?
Include me in one of your little bull sessions?
Can you imagine what it feels like to walk by this tent
and hear you laughing and know... that I'm not welcome?
Did you ever once offer me a lousy cup of coffee?"
-- Major Margaret Houlihan "M*A*S*H" ("The Nurses")
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Thanks for re-doing the results post. The original
post showed up out-of-kilter and things didn't line
up so it was hard to decipher. I read the newsgroup
on an iBook, don't know if that's a factor.
> Thanks for re-doing the results post. The original
> post showed up out-of-kilter and things didn't line
> up so it was hard to decipher. I read the newsgroup
> on an iBook, don't know if that's a factor.
>
You're welcome :)