Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Kimmel's Debut
23 views
Skip to first unread message
Gene
Jan 10, 2013, 10:02:13 AM1/10/13
to
Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324081704578231612273880862.html
"I'll kick his (Leno's) ass!" - Arsenio Hall, 1992
his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324081704578231612273880862.html
"I'll kick his (Leno's) ass!" - Arsenio Hall, 1992
Twibil
Jan 10, 2013, 1:54:37 PM1/10/13
to
On Jan 10, 7:02 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
> Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
> his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.
You can tell us the truth: you're really Leno's illegitimate son,
> Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
> his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.
right?
The one who resulted from his affair with Rue Paul, and who
works as an unpaid PR man for the Leno show?
Gene
Jan 10, 2013, 2:57:49 PM1/10/13
to
"Twibil" <noway...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:14fe69f9-bf82-47a9...@po6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
***************************************
Odd that he would inanely broach the topic of an affair,
given Letterman's public, self described, embarrassing
humiliation on the subject for which he, at least, was contrite.
But as with right-wingers who fervently believe that anyone
not in lock-step with their own biased beliefs must therefore
be a far left Maoist, so it similarly must be with fanbois that
assume that those having the tumerity to independently
monitor, evaluate and state the incontestable facts, must
accordinly be members of an opposite camp that are just
as repulsed by the spector of the truth as are the fanbois.
news:14fe69f9-bf82-47a9...@po6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
Odd that he would inanely broach the topic of an affair,
given Letterman's public, self described, embarrassing
humiliation on the subject for which he, at least, was contrite.
But as with right-wingers who fervently believe that anyone
not in lock-step with their own biased beliefs must therefore
be a far left Maoist, so it similarly must be with fanbois that
assume that those having the tumerity to independently
monitor, evaluate and state the incontestable facts, must
accordinly be members of an opposite camp that are just
as repulsed by the spector of the truth as are the fanbois.
R H Draney
Jan 10, 2013, 4:05:40 PM1/10/13
to
Gene filted:
So how's Carson Daly doing?...r
--
Me? Sarcastic?
Yeah, right.
--
Me? Sarcastic?
Yeah, right.
Gene
Jan 10, 2013, 5:44:45 PM1/10/13
to
"R H Draney" <dado...@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:kcnaf...@drn.newsguy.com...
I've not a clue, that show has never held the least attraction
for me, unlike the other four in this thread which, in fact,
have held my interest principly for their guests.
news:kcnaf...@drn.newsguy.com...
for me, unlike the other four in this thread which, in fact,
have held my interest principly for their guests.
Twibil
Jan 10, 2013, 7:28:47 PM1/10/13
to
On Jan 10, 11:57 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
> "Twibil" <nowayjo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Translation:
"I'm a Leno "fanboi" who can only achieve nirvana by
slamming Letterman, and my favorite way to do that
is to pretend that anyone who disagrees with me about
anything is a Letterman "fanboi" by definition. It's why
I keep using the word over and over: it's at once an
insult and a declaration of my inherent superiority"
Tell us: do you and Wiseguy go on little overnight
camp-outs together?
He could correct your spelling while you teach him how
to use fifty words wherever three would do, and you
could compete to see who could tell the tallest tale with
the straightest face while sputtering with feigned
outrage. :^)
> "Twibil" <nowayjo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
"I'm a Leno "fanboi" who can only achieve nirvana by
slamming Letterman, and my favorite way to do that
is to pretend that anyone who disagrees with me about
anything is a Letterman "fanboi" by definition. It's why
I keep using the word over and over: it's at once an
insult and a declaration of my inherent superiority"
Tell us: do you and Wiseguy go on little overnight
camp-outs together?
He could correct your spelling while you teach him how
to use fifty words wherever three would do, and you
could compete to see who could tell the tallest tale with
the straightest face while sputtering with feigned
outrage. :^)
Gene
Jan 10, 2013, 8:24:41 PM1/10/13
to
"Twibil" <noway...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f50b4a3f-e53e-4b34...@s8g2000pbw.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 10, 11:57 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
> "Twibil" <nowayjo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:14fe69f9-bf82-47a9...@po6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 10, 7:02 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
>
> > Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
> > his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.
>
> You can tell us the truth: you're really Leno's illegitimate son,
> right?
>
> The one who resulted from his affair with Rue Paul, and who
> works as an unpaid PR man for the Leno show?
> ***************************************
>
> Odd that he would inanely broach the topic of an affair,
> given Letterman's public, self described, embarrassing
> humiliation on the subject for which he, at least, was contrite.
> But as with right-wingers who fervently believe that anyone
> not in lock-step with their own biased beliefs must therefore
> be a far left Maoist, so it similarly must be with fanbois that
> assume that those having the tumerity to independently
> monitor, evaluate and state the incontestable facts, must
> accordinly be members of an opposite camp that are just
> as repulsed by the spector of the truth as are the fanbois.
I'm a Letterman "fanboi" who can only achieve nirvana by
> "Twibil" <nowayjo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:14fe69f9-bf82-47a9...@po6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 10, 7:02 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
>
> > Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
> > his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.
>
> You can tell us the truth: you're really Leno's illegitimate son,
> right?
>
> The one who resulted from his affair with Rue Paul, and who
> works as an unpaid PR man for the Leno show?
> ***************************************
>
> Odd that he would inanely broach the topic of an affair,
> given Letterman's public, self described, embarrassing
> humiliation on the subject for which he, at least, was contrite.
> But as with right-wingers who fervently believe that anyone
> not in lock-step with their own biased beliefs must therefore
> be a far left Maoist, so it similarly must be with fanbois that
> assume that those having the tumerity to independently
> monitor, evaluate and state the incontestable facts, must
> accordinly be members of an opposite camp that are just
> as repulsed by the spector of the truth as are the fanbois.
slamming Leno, and my favorite way to do that
is to pretend that anyone who disagrees with me about
anything is a Leno "fanboi" by definition. It's why
I keep using the word over and over: it's at once an
insult and a declaration of my inherent superiority.
Tell us: do you and Wiseguy go on little overnight
camp-outs together?
He could correct your spelling while you teach him how
to use fifty words wherever three would do, and you
could compete to see who could tell the tallest tale with
the straightest face while sputtering with feigned
outrage. :^)
Hard to believe that he could actually regress even further
than his previous pathetically feeble attempts at so much
as a 3rd grade insult, and yet he again continues with each
laughable polemic to accomplish the seemingly impossible.
Notice also how each and every one of his failed retaliatory
rebuttals ever once comes remotely close to addressing so
much as a single documented fact presented in my posts,
while his own are always devoid of any facts whatsoever.
Twibil
Jan 10, 2013, 10:45:47 PM1/10/13
to
On Jan 10, 5:24 pm, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hard to believe that he could actually regress even further
> than his previous pathetically feeble attempts at so much
> as a 3rd grade insult, and yet he again continues with each
> laughable polemic to accomplish the seemingly impossible.
>
> Notice also how each and every one of his failed retaliatory
> rebuttals ever once comes remotely close to addressing so
> much as a single documented fact presented in my posts,
> while his own are always devoid of any facts whatsoever.
Translation: "You got me".
>
>
> Hard to believe that he could actually regress even further
> than his previous pathetically feeble attempts at so much
> as a 3rd grade insult, and yet he again continues with each
> laughable polemic to accomplish the seemingly impossible.
>
> Notice also how each and every one of his failed retaliatory
> rebuttals ever once comes remotely close to addressing so
> much as a single documented fact presented in my posts,
> while his own are always devoid of any facts whatsoever.
Hint: you know how to end one of these at least even?
Don't reply.
Ta-ta, little troll.
Gene
Jan 11, 2013, 1:35:25 AM1/11/13
to
"Twibil" <noway...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a69b1b1b-f8e6-41e4...@sb6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 10, 5:24 pm, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
>
> Hard to believe that he could actually regress even further
> than his previous pathetically feeble attempts at so much
> as a 3rd grade insult, and yet he again continues with each
> laughable polemic to accomplish the seemingly impossible.
>
> Notice also how each and every one of his failed retaliatory
> rebuttals ever once comes remotely close to addressing so
> much as a single documented fact presented in my posts,
> while his own are always devoid of any facts whatsoever.
>
> Hard to believe that he could actually regress even further
> than his previous pathetically feeble attempts at so much
> as a 3rd grade insult, and yet he again continues with each
> laughable polemic to accomplish the seemingly impossible.
>
> Notice also how each and every one of his failed retaliatory
> rebuttals ever once comes remotely close to addressing so
> much as a single documented fact presented in my posts,
> while his own are always devoid of any facts whatsoever.
Hint: you know how to end one of these at least even?
@ He couldn't start to make it come out even with the
assistance of a woodworker's plane, a chemist's balance
and the entire staff of an international accounting firm.
Don't reply.
@ As he demonstrates an additional miserable failure,
this time in yet another risibly pathetic attempt to lead.
But obviously - "he can't lead where he won't go, he
can't teach what he don't know".
Ta-ta, little troll.
@ To paraphrase my earlier statement: "so long, again,
enormous bullshit artist".
@ Hopefully this time Python's hapless Black Knight won't
again return for even more pointless, execrable evisceration.
Wiseguy
Jan 11, 2013, 7:40:00 AM1/11/13
to
Twibil <noway...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:f50b4a3f-e53e-4b34...@s8g2000pbw.googlegroups.com:
> On Jan 10, 11:57 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
>> "Twibil" <nowayjo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:14fe69f9-bf82-47a9-945a-
aaca28...@po6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com
He automatically cries out TEA PARTY! What an idiot he is. And continues
to prove it.
> Translation:
>
> "I'm a Leno "fanboi" who can only achieve nirvana by
> slamming Letterman, and my favorite way to do that
> is to pretend that anyone who disagrees with me about
> anything is a Letterman "fanboi" by definition. It's why
> I keep using the word over and over: it's at once an
> insult and a declaration of my inherent superiority"
>
> Tell us: do you and Wiseguy go on little overnight
> camp-outs together?
>
> He could correct your spelling while you teach him how
> to use fifty words wherever three would do, and you
> could compete to see who could tell the tallest tale with
> the straightest face while sputtering with feigned
> outrage. :^)
>
Twibilshit just can't understand that his opinions aren't held by
everyone, a FACT painly obvious. Any anyone who dares to disagree with
Twibilshit has to be insulted. And in Twibilshit's mind, the ultimate
insult is
YOU'RE A LENO FAN
The fact that a majority of Americans ARE escapes his tiny mind.
And yes, I was taught the English language and know how to use it.
I prefer not to be ignorant like you.
But please continue. Your continued rants of idiocy are more
entertaining than anything on the Late Show.
news:f50b4a3f-e53e-4b34...@s8g2000pbw.googlegroups.com:
> On Jan 10, 11:57 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
>> "Twibil" <nowayjo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
aaca28...@po6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com
>> ... On Jan 10, 7:02 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
>> > his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.
>>
>> You can tell us the truth: you're really Leno's illegitimate son,
>> right?
>>
>> The one who resulted from his affair with Rue Paul, and who
>> works as an unpaid PR man for the Leno show?
>> ***************************************
>>
>> Odd that he would inanely broach the topic of an affair,
>> given Letterman's public, self described, embarrassing
>> humiliation on the subject for which he, at least, was contrite.
>> But as with right-wingers who fervently believe that anyone
>> not in lock-step with their own biased beliefs must therefore
>> be a far left Maoist, so it similarly must be with fanbois that
>> assume that those having the tumerity to independently
>> monitor, evaluate and state the incontestable facts, must
>> accordinly be members of an opposite camp that are just
>> as repulsed by the spector of the truth as are the fanbois.
>
This is obvious whenever someone disagrees with Twibilshit's politics.
>>
>> > Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
>> > his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.
>>
>> You can tell us the truth: you're really Leno's illegitimate son,
>> right?
>>
>> The one who resulted from his affair with Rue Paul, and who
>> works as an unpaid PR man for the Leno show?
>> ***************************************
>>
>> Odd that he would inanely broach the topic of an affair,
>> given Letterman's public, self described, embarrassing
>> humiliation on the subject for which he, at least, was contrite.
>> But as with right-wingers who fervently believe that anyone
>> not in lock-step with their own biased beliefs must therefore
>> be a far left Maoist, so it similarly must be with fanbois that
>> assume that those having the tumerity to independently
>> monitor, evaluate and state the incontestable facts, must
>> accordinly be members of an opposite camp that are just
>> as repulsed by the spector of the truth as are the fanbois.
>
He automatically cries out TEA PARTY! What an idiot he is. And continues
to prove it.
> Translation:
>
> "I'm a Leno "fanboi" who can only achieve nirvana by
> slamming Letterman, and my favorite way to do that
> is to pretend that anyone who disagrees with me about
> anything is a Letterman "fanboi" by definition. It's why
> I keep using the word over and over: it's at once an
> insult and a declaration of my inherent superiority"
>
> Tell us: do you and Wiseguy go on little overnight
> camp-outs together?
>
> He could correct your spelling while you teach him how
> to use fifty words wherever three would do, and you
> could compete to see who could tell the tallest tale with
> the straightest face while sputtering with feigned
> outrage. :^)
>
everyone, a FACT painly obvious. Any anyone who dares to disagree with
Twibilshit has to be insulted. And in Twibilshit's mind, the ultimate
insult is
YOU'RE A LENO FAN
The fact that a majority of Americans ARE escapes his tiny mind.
And yes, I was taught the English language and know how to use it.
I prefer not to be ignorant like you.
But please continue. Your continued rants of idiocy are more
entertaining than anything on the Late Show.
Wiseguy
Jan 11, 2013, 7:41:16 AM1/11/13
to
"Gene" <gene....@home.com> wrote in
news:kcnpk7$5f0$1...@speranza.aioe.org:
> news:f50b4a3f-e53e-4b34-9f9d-
b8f498...@s8g2000pbw.googlegroups.com..
aaca28...@po6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com
LOL
Twibilshit loses again.
No other result possible.
news:kcnpk7$5f0$1...@speranza.aioe.org:
> news:f50b4a3f-e53e-4b34-9f9d-
b8f498...@s8g2000pbw.googlegroups.com..
> . On Jan 10, 11:57 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
>> "Twibil" <nowayjo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:14fe69f9-bf82-47a9-945a-
>> "Twibil" <nowayjo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
aaca28...@po6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com
Twibilshit loses again.
No other result possible.
Wiseguy
Jan 11, 2013, 7:59:40 AM1/11/13
to
Twibil <noway...@gmail.com> wrote in news:a69b1b1b-f8e6-41e4-936d-
0573b5...@sb6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:
Amazing you got the translation right.
But nothing else.
The definition of troll is not anyone who disagrees with twibilshit.
You can't even follow your own (worthless) advice. You keep replying,
building idiocy upon idiocy.
Worthless because not responding to stupidity doesn't end things even.
It allows the moron (you) to think he is right. And we have the
responsibility to enlighten those with a brain (unlike you) to the fact
that you're an idiot.
Perhaps you can't understand things without a few random asterisks and
imature retorts:
*Worthless* because not responding to *stupidity* doesn't end things
even. It allows the *moron* (you, tsk) to think he is right. And we
have the *responsibility* to enlighten those with a *brain* (unlike you,
heh) to the fact that you're an *idiot.* Tsk, heh, shrug.
Is that better?
0573b5...@sb6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:
But nothing else.
The definition of troll is not anyone who disagrees with twibilshit.
You can't even follow your own (worthless) advice. You keep replying,
building idiocy upon idiocy.
Worthless because not responding to stupidity doesn't end things even.
It allows the moron (you) to think he is right. And we have the
responsibility to enlighten those with a brain (unlike you) to the fact
that you're an idiot.
Perhaps you can't understand things without a few random asterisks and
imature retorts:
*Worthless* because not responding to *stupidity* doesn't end things
even. It allows the *moron* (you, tsk) to think he is right. And we
have the *responsibility* to enlighten those with a *brain* (unlike you,
heh) to the fact that you're an *idiot.* Tsk, heh, shrug.
Is that better?
Steve Curtis
Jan 11, 2013, 12:39:58 PM1/11/13
to
"Wiseguy" wrote:
>Twibilshit just can't understand that his
>opinions aren't held by everyone, a
>FACT painly obvious.
>Twibilshit just can't understand that his
>opinions aren't held by everyone, a
>FACT painly obvious.
>And yes, I was taught the English
>language and know how to use it.
Apparently you don't, despite all your attempts to correct posted
>language and know how to use it.
grammar and spelling errors.
"...painly obvious"?
Twibil
Jan 11, 2013, 2:55:15 PM1/11/13
to
On Jan 11, 4:59 am, Wiseguy <epw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> The definition of troll is not anyone who disagrees with twibilshit.
Translation: As the latter-day incarnation of Charlie
>
>
> The definition of troll is not anyone who disagrees with twibilshit.
Sheen (note spelling) I hereby declare that I have won,
you have lost, and you can't argue with that because
it's the truth if I say it is."
"You must disregard my use of 4th grade profanity,
my own spelling and grammar mistakes, my overt
trolling, my never-ending series of lies, and my
copycat use of every line Pete ever posted in my
vain search for something to say that will make me
feel better about myself, because *I WIN!*
Tell us: do the words "around the bend" ring any
bells with you, Charlie?
Wiseguy
Jan 11, 2013, 3:00:24 PM1/11/13
to
iamh...@webtv.net (Steve Curtis) wrote in news:26411-50F04E6E-135
@storefull-3112.bay.webtv.net:
I never claimed to be an expert typist.
(Unlike twibilshit who claims to be an expert everything.)
Look up typo in a dictionary if you know how to use one.
That's "typographical error" in case you don't know.
And keep backing twibilshit.
It makes you look just as stupid and arrogant.
...plainly obvious.
There, is that better, little boy?
Or perhaps I should add a bunch of asterisks and retorts so that little
minds like you and twibilshit can understand better.
*plainly* obvious, heh, tsk.
By the way, typos have nothing to do with knowledge of spelling and
grammar. But I wouldn't expect you to know that.
You don't really care about typos and grammar. You only care about
whether I have the same opinions as you. I don't, therefore you attack
me like a little child would. You're pathetic.
I'm proud I don't agree with everything you and twibilshit think and
say.
Deal with it.
@storefull-3112.bay.webtv.net:
(Unlike twibilshit who claims to be an expert everything.)
Look up typo in a dictionary if you know how to use one.
That's "typographical error" in case you don't know.
And keep backing twibilshit.
It makes you look just as stupid and arrogant.
...plainly obvious.
There, is that better, little boy?
Or perhaps I should add a bunch of asterisks and retorts so that little
minds like you and twibilshit can understand better.
*plainly* obvious, heh, tsk.
By the way, typos have nothing to do with knowledge of spelling and
grammar. But I wouldn't expect you to know that.
You don't really care about typos and grammar. You only care about
whether I have the same opinions as you. I don't, therefore you attack
me like a little child would. You're pathetic.
I'm proud I don't agree with everything you and twibilshit think and
say.
Deal with it.
Wiseguy
Jan 11, 2013, 3:17:51 PM1/11/13
to
Twibil <noway...@gmail.com> wrote in news:b1bfdc3e-76ff-4b39-9af5-
7ada53...@px4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
Nobody needs your stupid translations.
What we tell you is in plain English.
We just don't put asterisks where they don't belong and use childish
retorts like you do.
And what is the fascination with Charlie Sheen?
You like him because you're both psycho?
Using the English word win in any form does not mean I am channeling
Charlie Sheen. It means I speak English. Understand? No, of course
you don't. You prove your inability to grasp the simplest concept with
your every post.
Again with the lies. And no matter how many times I ask you tell me ONE
lie I have said, you have never done so. Because there are no lies.
But in your feeble little mind you have convinced yourself that anyone
who disagrees with you is lying. You're psycho.
Oh, I sorry, you can't understand it unless I translate it down to your
level: You're *psycho*, heh tsk.
7ada53...@px4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
What we tell you is in plain English.
We just don't put asterisks where they don't belong and use childish
retorts like you do.
And what is the fascination with Charlie Sheen?
You like him because you're both psycho?
Using the English word win in any form does not mean I am channeling
Charlie Sheen. It means I speak English. Understand? No, of course
you don't. You prove your inability to grasp the simplest concept with
your every post.
Again with the lies. And no matter how many times I ask you tell me ONE
lie I have said, you have never done so. Because there are no lies.
But in your feeble little mind you have convinced yourself that anyone
who disagrees with you is lying. You're psycho.
Oh, I sorry, you can't understand it unless I translate it down to your
level: You're *psycho*, heh tsk.
Steve Curtis
Jan 11, 2013, 6:24:32 PM1/11/13
to
"Wiseguy" wrote:
>(Steve Curtis) wrote:
>>"Wiseguy" wrote:
>>>Twibilshit just can't understand that
>>>his opinions aren't held by everyone, a
>>>FACT painly obvious.
>>>And yes, I was taught the English
>>>language and know how to use it.
>>Apparently you don't, despite all your
>>attempts to correct posted grammar
>>and spelling errors.
>>"...painly obvious"?
Edition of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (page 1355): "...is
an error (as of spelling) in typed or typeset material." Time to
re-think your own definition of "typo"?
>And keep backing twibilshit.
>It makes you look just as stupid and
>arrogant.
I'm not "backing" up anyone. I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy when
it comes to correcting others about spelling errors, grammatical errors,
and yes, even "typos."
that "send" button might have saved you the embarrassment and the
response such as this.
>Or perhaps I should add a bunch of
>asterisks and retorts so that little minds
>like you and twibilshit can understand
>better.
Oh you can post in any manner you wish. However, including personal
attacks in the form of insults, only serves to minimize your
credibility.
>By the way, typos have nothing to do
>with knowledge of spelling and grammar.
>But I wouldn't expect you to know that.
See above reference to dictionary definition.
>You don't really care about typos and
>grammar. You only care about whether I
>have the same opinions as you. I don't,
>therefore you attack me like a little child
>would. You're pathetic.
Actually, I couldn't give a rat's ass about your opinion(s).
Attack you? And you're not attacking me with "little minds like you" and
"You're pathetic"? Can you say, "hypocrisy"?
>I'm proud I don't agree with everything
>you and twibilshit think and say.
Makes me proud to disagree with you when it comes to critical thinking
skills.
>Deal with it.
Deal with that.
>(Steve Curtis) wrote:
>>"Wiseguy" wrote:
>>>Twibilshit just can't understand that
>>>his opinions aren't held by everyone, a
>>>FACT painly obvious.
>>>And yes, I was taught the English
>>>language and know how to use it.
>>Apparently you don't, despite all your
>>attempts to correct posted grammar
>>and spelling errors.
>>"...painly obvious"?
>Look up typo in a dictionary if you know
>how to use one. That's "typographical
>error" in case you don't know.
Spare me the patronizing drivel. A "typo," as defined in the Eleventh
>how to use one. That's "typographical
>error" in case you don't know.
Edition of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (page 1355): "...is
an error (as of spelling) in typed or typeset material." Time to
re-think your own definition of "typo"?
>And keep backing twibilshit.
>It makes you look just as stupid and
>arrogant.
it comes to correcting others about spelling errors, grammatical errors,
and yes, even "typos."
>...plainly obvious.
>There, is that better, little boy?
Proof-reading and/or spell-checking your intended post prior to hitting
>There, is that better, little boy?
that "send" button might have saved you the embarrassment and the
response such as this.
>Or perhaps I should add a bunch of
>asterisks and retorts so that little minds
>like you and twibilshit can understand
>better.
attacks in the form of insults, only serves to minimize your
credibility.
>By the way, typos have nothing to do
>with knowledge of spelling and grammar.
>But I wouldn't expect you to know that.
>You don't really care about typos and
>grammar. You only care about whether I
>have the same opinions as you. I don't,
>therefore you attack me like a little child
>would. You're pathetic.
Attack you? And you're not attacking me with "little minds like you" and
"You're pathetic"? Can you say, "hypocrisy"?
>I'm proud I don't agree with everything
>you and twibilshit think and say.
skills.
>Deal with it.
Deal with that.
JG
Jan 11, 2013, 6:33:42 PM1/11/13
to
On Jan 10, 9:02 am, "Gene" <gene.e.y...@home.com> wrote:
> Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
> his rivals' hour wasn't sufficient to overcome Leno's viewership.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788732408170457823161227388...
> Although he beat Letterman, even the novelty of his debut at
>
> "I'll kick his (Leno's) ass!" - Arsenio Hall, 1992
I'm now taping jkl and watching the chin. Sorry Dave, but Monday's
> "I'll kick his (Leno's) ass!" - Arsenio Hall, 1992
show failed to make me stay on Tuesday. I'll switch from leno on
Friday to catch the "Weekend LS" promo in act 2.
Twibil
Jan 11, 2013, 8:20:00 PM1/11/13
to
On Jan 11, 3:24 pm, iamh2o...@webtv.net (Steve Curtis) wrote:
>
>
> >I'm proud I don't agree with everything
> >you and twibilshit think and say.
>
> Makes me proud to disagree with you when it comes to critical thinking
> skills.
Wiseguy has critical thinking skills?
>
>
> >I'm proud I don't agree with everything
> >you and twibilshit think and say.
>
> Makes me proud to disagree with you when it comes to critical thinking
> skills.
Wow! Who knew?
Vocalize
Jan 12, 2013, 1:03:48 PM1/12/13
to
On 1/11/13 4:59 AM, in article XnsA1454726F235...@69.16.185.252,
that which they deem to be invalid, irrelevant, unsuitable ...?
0 new messages