Received: by 10.66.82.195 with SMTP id k3mr579598pay.23.1347528874123;
        Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.233.104 with SMTP id tv8mr377974pbc.5.1347528874104; Thu,
 13 Sep 2012 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Path: t10ni4303pbh.0!nntp.google.com!r4no5819612pbs.0!postnews.google.com!j2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.fan.landmark
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=60.234.226.62; posting-account=BU1nRwkAAAB0cXNPuaGde47X81uTwB-L
NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.234.226.62
References: <d52609d4-aaae-4005-8f52-5d504df75ad3@rq1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <f6ea699b-3a3f-4b6d-b1d0-010a84ba27f9@ud9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <5596231e-812e-495e-9a54-f36cb9594106@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <fd4cd047-6d5a-4e14-a125-58867525206c@pz10g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <983a1207-19f0-42c2-a775-853f2b1bfd35@j2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: "MY (SCARY, DESTRUCTIVE) BRUSH WITH SCIENTOLOGY LIGHT"
From: Serena Nordstrup <s_nordst...@my-deja.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:34:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sep 13, 1:07=A0am, tubby <btono...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 10:15=A0pm, Serena Nordstrup <s_nordst...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 3, 10:58=A0pm, tubby <btono...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 3, 2:50=A0pm, Caligari <enric.me...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > From: =A0http://www.xojane.com/newagey/landmark-forum-cult
>
> > > > MY (SCARY, DESTRUCTIVE) BRUSH WITH SCIENTOLOGY LIGHT
>
> > =A0<snip>
>
> > > I can relate to what this participant is stating and most of what she
> > > says
> > > is true. However I disagree with the tone of the story,
>
> > Do you mean that you don't like the tone of the account?

Do you mean that you don't like the tone of the account, Bruno?

> > Can one disagree with a tone?
>
> When it is exaggerated and it appeals to the emotions

You complain when I (allegedly) do not show emotion, Bruno, and you
disagree with a ~story~ that (allegedly) appeals to emotions...

Can you give an example of what you might regard as exaggeration in
Sarah Fazeli's ~story~ ?

> > > in that it seems to me to be melodramatic .
>
> > If you ever get an opportunity to see a melodrama, Bruno, go. You
> > might have a good old laugh.
>
> The description of what may have happened was sensational
> exaggeration =A0IMO.

Why, did you learn something atypical of what you've heard before?

> > > What I don't get though that =A0she claims to have gotten
>
> > > " =93I learned that I should trust
>
> > > > my instincts.=94 Like the time my gut told me, "Sarah, run fast. It=
=92s
> > > > totally a cult.=94
>
> > We ~get~ that you don't ~get~ some things, Bruno.
>
> So are you going to give us another explanation of why Caligari did
> not run as fast as Sarah?????

I don't see the connection.

> > > Which is fine by me. However if this is true how come you in being so
> > > close to
> > > the "Nectar" =A0 Werner that is and his cronies, did not spot what sh=
e
> > > got in a week end.
>
> > > I ask you this because you have brought us to the attention of what I
> > > call a true but =A0melodramatic
> > > account of what may have happened which you must see as important
> > > otherwise you =A0would have not brought it
> > > to our attention.
>
> > Caligari always posts seriously?
>
> Most of the time. His viewpoints certainly have more meat on them then
> yours!!!!!

You regard vegetarians as flippant?

> > > I also don't see the Scientology tie up in the heading. To =A0my
> > > knowledge Scientology has a total different approach
> > > and presentation of its material.
>
> > ... but remarkably similar material?
>
> How would you know.

I asked. I put a question mark on the end of the phrase.

> Are you also an expert in Scientology now?????????

As well as in vexillology ?

> > > There is no E meter =A0in Forum as per
> > > my experience.
>
> > Therefore ...
>
> Therefore your comments as usual are wee bit flaky??????????

What does the lack of an overt e-meter in the ~landmark~ so-called
~forum~ have to do with my comments, Bruno?

> cheers
>
> > > If you know different =A0then tell us about it.
>
> > > Cheers