Message from discussion "MY (SCARY, DESTRUCTIVE) BRUSH WITH SCIENTOLOGY LIGHT"
Received: by 10.66.82.195 with SMTP id k3mr579598pay.23.1347528874123;
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.233.104 with SMTP id tv8mr377974pbc.5.1347528874104; Thu,
13 Sep 2012 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: j2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=184.108.40.206; posting-account=BU1nRwkAAAB0cXNPuaGde47X81uTwB-L
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Subject: Re: "MY (SCARY, DESTRUCTIVE) BRUSH WITH SCIENTOLOGY LIGHT"
From: Serena Nordstrup <s_nordst...@my-deja.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:34:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On Sep 13, 1:07=A0am, tubby <btono...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 10:15=A0pm, Serena Nordstrup <s_nordst...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 3, 10:58=A0pm, tubby <btono...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sep 3, 2:50=A0pm, Caligari <enric.me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > From: =A0http://www.xojane.com/newagey/landmark-forum-cult
> > > > MY (SCARY, DESTRUCTIVE) BRUSH WITH SCIENTOLOGY LIGHT
> > =A0<snip>
> > > I can relate to what this participant is stating and most of what she
> > > says
> > > is true. However I disagree with the tone of the story,
> > Do you mean that you don't like the tone of the account?
Do you mean that you don't like the tone of the account, Bruno?
> > Can one disagree with a tone?
> When it is exaggerated and it appeals to the emotions
You complain when I (allegedly) do not show emotion, Bruno, and you
disagree with a ~story~ that (allegedly) appeals to emotions...
Can you give an example of what you might regard as exaggeration in
Sarah Fazeli's ~story~ ?
> > > in that it seems to me to be melodramatic .
> > If you ever get an opportunity to see a melodrama, Bruno, go. You
> > might have a good old laugh.
> The description of what may have happened was sensational
> exaggeration =A0IMO.
Why, did you learn something atypical of what you've heard before?
> > > What I don't get though that =A0she claims to have gotten
> > > " =93I learned that I should trust
> > > > my instincts.=94 Like the time my gut told me, "Sarah, run fast. It=
> > > > totally a cult.=94
> > We ~get~ that you don't ~get~ some things, Bruno.
> So are you going to give us another explanation of why Caligari did
> not run as fast as Sarah?????
I don't see the connection.
> > > Which is fine by me. However if this is true how come you in being so
> > > close to
> > > the "Nectar" =A0 Werner that is and his cronies, did not spot what sh=
> > > got in a week end.
> > > I ask you this because you have brought us to the attention of what I
> > > call a true but =A0melodramatic
> > > account of what may have happened which you must see as important
> > > otherwise you =A0would have not brought it
> > > to our attention.
> > Caligari always posts seriously?
> Most of the time. His viewpoints certainly have more meat on them then
You regard vegetarians as flippant?
> > > I also don't see the Scientology tie up in the heading. To =A0my
> > > knowledge Scientology has a total different approach
> > > and presentation of its material.
> > ... but remarkably similar material?
> How would you know.
I asked. I put a question mark on the end of the phrase.
> Are you also an expert in Scientology now?????????
As well as in vexillology ?
> > > There is no E meter =A0in Forum as per
> > > my experience.
> > Therefore ...
> Therefore your comments as usual are wee bit flaky??????????
What does the lack of an overt e-meter in the ~landmark~ so-called
~forum~ have to do with my comments, Bruno?
> > > If you know different =A0then tell us about it.
> > > Cheers