Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion ~Responsibility~ as opposed to ~being at cause~
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Serena Nordstrup  
View profile  
 More options Nov 19 2012, 4:27 am
Newsgroups: alt.fan.landmark
From: Serena Nordstrup <s_nordst...@my-deja.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:27:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 19 2012 4:27 am
Subject: Re: ~Responsibility~ as opposed to ~being at cause~
On 19 Nov, 00:50, tubby <btono...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 18, 6:18 pm, Serena Nordstrup <s_nordst...@my-deja.com> wrote:

> > On Nov 17, 3:23 am, tubby <btono...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On Nov 7, 1:15 am, Kenny McCormick <kennymccormicksfa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:

> > > > > Yeah, all that tilde-laden jargon can look opaque -- even to those who
> > > > > write it . So I'll do you a favor: I'll paraphrase. You wrote that
> > > > > ~responsibility~ gets redefined such that it may look like what I
> > > > > would call (neutrally) re-framing, but that taking on new
> > > > > ~responsibility~ might prove beneficial. Hence my question: what
> > > > > advantages does one gain by adding more ~responsibility~ (as opposed
> > > > > to ~being at cause~) to the idea of re- framing ?

> > > > ~???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????~

> > > Hey Serena  where are you?????
> > > Come out behind that rock that you and your Muses are hiding behind.
> > > Kenny is asking for more support and as you claim to be a "good Coach"

> > where?

> > > then start Coaching rather than leaving the scene!!!!!!!!!!

> > > yOUR BOYFRIEND DOWN SOUTH MISSES YOUR ASTUTE IN DEPTH QUESTIONING!!!!

> > I thought of you a lot during the eclipse, Bruno. Did you undertake
> > the pilgrimage to Cairns for the ~experience~ of the eclipse last
> > week?

> Oh thank you for asking fair Serena.
> No I did not know it was even happening till a Technician came to see
> me and told me a partial Eclipse
> was taking place that morning in Melbourne. I did not have the proper
> glasses so I could not look at it.

You passed on the ~possibility~ of ~experiencing~ an eclipse ?

You passed on the ~possibility~ of ~experiencing~ something merely
because you lacked "the proper glasses" ?

You credited the need for "the proper glasses" and placed that above
direct ~experience~?

You passed on the  ~possibility~ of ~experiencing~ pain and blindness,
all because of some negativity about the properness of glasses?

Shame on you, Bruno! Always henceforward I shall ~experience~ doubt
when you preach the value of direct ~experience~ ....

> However my daughter did fly up to Cairns and had a great time/ She met
> lots of interesting people
> and enjoyed her stay.

> I'm glad to hear you are thinking of me sometimes so my offer to buy
> you a drink is once again open.

> I just want to see what you look like when you ask your astute  deep
> and meaningful questions.

> Is that too much to ask.

Mere distraction from the astuteness, depth, and meaningfulosity.

> I will bring along my wife of course for protection if you don't mind.

She who first labeled me slippery and slimy? -- No problemo!

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.