Received: by 10.224.223.84 with SMTP id ij20mr6103837qab.5.1348323861059;
        Sat, 22 Sep 2012 07:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.74.161 with SMTP id x21mr1023486yhd.13.1348323861032; Sat,
 22 Sep 2012 07:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e10ni13434282qan.0!nntp.google.com!l8no5779130qao.0!postnews.google.com!l14g2000yqo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.fan.landmark
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 07:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l14g2000yqo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.124.86.213; posting-account=ujSEXgoAAAAxAMO51xePmsp4HD9EXAT0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.124.86.213
References: <b826fbb4-6154-4612-8e5b-4b015300ddc1@googlegroups.com>
 <0fc03335-1bd2-47c4-a232-568e50f37916@googlegroups.com> <2ef0774c-6598-4f9b-956c-6e2d4323f85f@googlegroups.com>
 <86c65a90-a3c0-457f-a4ae-97471d63ba25@googlegroups.com> <0e8dfad1-227e-4548-84a3-36313945f334@m9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <8f2f3db5-d920-4e88-bac0-79eb636531f1@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <6a8q58laeu01oooks2cpek3671iicrn9ku@4ax.com> <a572553f-70ab-4dae-a834-eecf24721233@sd5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0.7,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <c99a6797-7eb4-46e6-bceb-e827ccf83444@l14g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ~Victimology;~ Ayn or Werner or ElRon?
From: patrick <patrickda...@linuxmail.org>
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:24:21 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sep 22, 5:15=A0am, Serena Nordstrup <s_nordst...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2:28=A0pm, bentot <bentot1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:28:57 -0700 (PDT), patrick
>
> > <patrickda...@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> > >On Sep 20, 7:06=A0pm, patrick <patrickda...@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> > >> On Sep 19, 10:29=A0pm, Tex <ritter_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > Thanks for the article.
> > >> > Lying for the Lord?
> > >> > OK, that explains Mitten's pathological aversion for the truth.
> > >> > But how do we explain Paul Ryan?
>
> > >> > Thomas Aquinas certainly would not approve.
>
> > >> > Seems like a Republican disease.
> > >> > Sometime they even contradict themselves in mid-sentence, on TV!!!=
!
>
> > >> > Incredible.
>
> > >> > On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:38:43 AM UTC-4, (unknown) wrot=
e:
> > >> > > On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 2:08:56 PM UTC-7, Tex wrote:
>
> > >> > > > That was the "cult" of millionaire donors, Ellen.
>
> > >> > > > The cult of Thurston Howell III.
>
> > >> > > > Gilligan is part of the 47% he refers to as "victims."
>
> > >> > > > Hard working stiffs that don't make enough to pay Federal taxe=
s.
>
> > >> > > > Mitt"ens" is in an exclusive cult.
>
> > >> > > > Most Mormons need not apply.
>
> > >> > > > The cult of plutocrats.
>
> > >> > > Most Mormons will vote in lock-step. =A0They do what they are to=
ld to do, whether or not it is in their best interests. =A0Most Mormons are=
 not wealthy, though they aspire to wealth and are constantly instructed th=
at the way to wealth is the Mormon way and wealth, in and of itself, is de =
facto evidence that one has adhered devoutly and correctly to Mormon "princ=
iples" and been "blessed" by God for this fealty.
>
> > >> > > It's no big mystery that pyramid schemes (cults) thrive in the U=
.S. -- we've been a petri dish for these things since the beginning of Euro=
pean settlement. =A0"Prosperity" cults have taken over a huge portion of th=
e populace and the Mormon model with the bottom 99% all dutifully tithing w=
ithout complaint is probably Mitt's model to bring the U.S. into a reflecti=
on of Mormon "perfection" for himself and his rich friends.
>
> > >> > > Most Mormons believe Mitt is the anointed savior of the U.S. Con=
stitution, =A0though they will deny it publicly. It's been referred to as t=
he "White Horse Prophecy." =A0I wonder how they will explain the fact to th=
emselves that the U.S. doesn't want Mormon "salvation." =A0Or that a fellow=
 republican, (G.W.Bush), did more to undermine the Constitution than any ot=
her president in history.
>
> > >> > > Here's an interesting article about the reasons why we shouldn't=
 vote for a Mormon or allow a Mormon any authority over the U.S.
>
> > >> > >http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/07/exclusive-brigha=
m-yo...
>
> > >> > > Ellen
>
> > >> > > > On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:08:42 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wro=
te:
>
> > >> > > > > ...Or some other unholy communion with one of the champions =
of personal ~responsibility?~ =A0Where did Mitt get his conviction that tho=
se of wealth and privilege, those of status and power, those of influence a=
nd ~leadership,~ get to lord it over the rest of us "moochers" and "parasit=
es" and "victims?" =A0At what point, did he of Mormon "social responsibilit=
y," turn into a scold who denounces and dismisses anyone who isn't in a pos=
ition to pay for everything he or she needs, (like a $60,000 appendectomy).=
 =A0And how does he square this with the right-wing mandate to eviscerate t=
he unions, deprive workers of any sort of (collective) power, or pay them a=
nything all if they can outsource labor to some third-world country with pr=
oviding some hapless worker the ability to actually take any sort of ~contr=
ol~ over his own destiny, let alone pay for any of the goods or services Mi=
tt and his crony "job-creators" deign to provide?
>
> > >> > > > > Nope, it's the same old cult-like cult nonsense that would l=
ike ~victims~ to go away and hide in the bushes, too ashamed to complain, t=
oo intimidated to protest, and likely to blame themselves for any unfortuna=
te event they happen to have brought upon themselves.
>
> > >> > > > > What a hoot. =A0It's just so many idiotic cult-mindset nutte=
rs projecting themselves upon society in some lame-assed attempt to ~create=
 their own reality.~
>
> > >> > > > > LOLOL...
>
> > >> > > > > Ellen
>
> > >> tex do u believe in trickle down brainwashing ?
>
> > >a simple yes or no with do,
>
> > At risk of sounding like ???serena???, is there room for "maybe?".
>
> ... a big risk, a bold response. Congratulations!
>
> > And, how about trickle up? :)
>
> Indeed!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > bentot

 of course