From: estie_lau...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Landmark sues Elle Magazine press release
Date: 1998/09/05
Message-ID: <6ss760$5ts$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 388225384
References: <1998090101291200.VAA09297@ladder01.news.aol.com> <6sh7dq$p06$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35f14e0f.532308@news.vnet.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x6.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.152.119.33
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Sep 05 20:33:04 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.fan.landmark
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/2.01 (Win16; U)

In article <35f14e0f.532...@news.vnet.net>,
  fk...@vnet.net (Fred Kidd) wrote:

>
> A simple letter to the editor would have been sufficient

Right on, Frederino!  I thought of that, too.  Landmark could have presented
their view much more effectively in a letter to the editor.  I think they're
making fools of themselves, getting out the big guns against an article in a
fashion magazine that was hardly a scathing indictment of the Forum.

> LEC's lack of research is just as blatant. The only true
> representative report on what impact LEC programs have had on the
> participants would be a long term study of every graduate by an
> independent entity funded with independent funds.

*****LONG OVERDUE!*****

I've been experiencing some heart rhythm irregularities since a few evenings
ago, and I don't think the aggravation of participating in this ng is doing it
any good, so I'm going to back off for a while.

To leave you (generic) with one additional thought.

What tolerance on Landmark's part would look like.  I don't want to limit it
to this, but one possible way it would look would be if Landmark took the
approach that any and all feedback on it's programs was welcome.

- Estie

--
SPAMMER NOTICE:  Poster is a toothless moonshining resident of the State of
Washington, US.

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum