From: "Larry Person" <La...@LarryPerson.com>
Subject: Re: Today
Date: 1999/08/19
Message-ID: <afTu3.3194$9K.4030@news.rdc1.nj.home.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 514665593
References: <7BQu3.3171$9K.3774@news.rdc1.nj.home.com> <19990819071449.05615.00001050@ngol03.aol.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news.rdc1.nj.home.com 935067718 24.3.145.246 (Thu, 19 Aug 1999 06:01:58 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 06:01:58 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.fan.landmark

Yup.  Also we're all still human, we're not transformed 100 percent of the
time, we still argue and carry on and we ENJOY arguing and carrying on and
sometimes we don't get off it, and sometimes it has NOTHING TO DO WITH
COMMITMENTS AND OUR WORD!


KMottus wrote in message <19990819071449.05615.00001...@ngol03.aol.com>...
>In article <7BQu3.3171$9K.3...@news.rdc1.nj.home.com>, "Larry Person"
><La...@LarryPerson.com> writes:
>
>>Jim Foster wrote in message <7pgasj$vd...@nntp2.atl.mindspring.net>...
>>> i got it --to my innermost being-- that we as
>>>people aren't being our word when we argue (just look at lawyers ;).
>>
>>Jim, I don't see that arguing and being our word are mutually exclusive.
>
>I gotta agreed with Larry on this one.  It greatly depends on
>what is driving the arguing, what's underneath it.  But that'd
>get you into that grey area you don't like.  Easier to just think
>all arguing/disagreement is bad, rather than discern what any
>particular arguement is about, and decide out of that.
>
>K.
>
>
>*********************************************************
>Access to power must be confined to those who are
>not in love with it.
>-Plato
>
>kmot...@aol.com