Received: by 10.224.186.20 with SMTP id cq20mr6113882qab.8.1353222945912;
        Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:15:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.130.106 with SMTP id od10mr1771242qeb.20.1353222945878;
 Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:15:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: gf5ni327qab.0!nntp.google.com!u2no6204483qal.0!postnews.google.com!m4g2000pbd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.fan.landmark
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:15:45 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m4g2000pbd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=60.234.226.62; posting-account=BU1nRwkAAAB0cXNPuaGde47X81uTwB-L
NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.234.226.62
References: <55b662c8-18dd-4e49-aaa3-cf2b63c8c852@googlegroups.com>
 <55f0e5fc-a734-49c9-96e0-cd6adde4efae@u4g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>
 <2333499d-fbb1-4543-a58f-9792266ff957@googlegroups.com> <51574b21-e232-4407-9c5e-ce9631848dec@googlegroups.com>
 <1d2868b4-cf1a-4ab4-9dcd-168cab041953@ah9g2000pbd.googlegroups.com>
 <cc68329c-a460-48d4-b074-2783309af1b0@ah9g2000pbd.googlegroups.com>
 <783e81df-f2f5-4515-abc9-b2f5c371bb11@ah9g2000pbd.googlegroups.com>
 <ed3f5d84-c3a3-4e09-b9d2-90ca2e615c9b@g7g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>
 <7620c1ac-703e-40cf-8d80-b15c3fac7c34@g7g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>
 <dc5104fa-6b66-416f-8c5b-43e259c4fd73@y5g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>
 <19c8e249-d7f2-4e2e-835d-5beb78d09314@mq1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <d4257597-e016-41a0-b974-181e058b4cb2@nl3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <b25a29f2-01fe-4cd8-834a-61be28893286@6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Ubuntu/12.04 Chromium/20.0.1132.47 Chrome/20.0.1132.47 Safari/536.11,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <cdf593e9-8090-4cb8-9116-fd4c9a0005c5@m4g2000pbd.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ~Responsibility~ as opposed to ~being at cause~
From: Serena Nordstrup <s_nordst...@my-deja.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:15:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 7, 3:15=A0am, Kenny McCormick <kennymccormicksfa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Yeah, all that tilde-laden jargon can look opaque -- even to those who
> > write it . So I'll do you a favor: I'll paraphrase. You wrote that
> > ~responsibility~ gets redefined such that it may look like what I
> > would call (neutrally) re-framing, but that taking on new
> > ~responsibility~ might prove beneficial. Hence my question: what
> > advantages does one gain by adding more ~responsibility~ (as opposed
> > to ~being at cause~) to the idea of re- framing ?
>
> ~???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????~

Which part of the question do you have trouble addressing, Kenny? --

The question (for reference) reads:

You wrote that ~responsibility~ gets redefined such that it may look
like what I would call (neutrally) re-framing, but that taking on new
~responsibility~ might prove beneficial. Hence my question: what
 advantages does one gain by adding more ~responsibility~ (as opposed
 to ~being at cause~) to the idea of re- framing ?