On May 26, 12:18 am, fatladysingshere <
toolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So that relates to my question as to how relevant looks appear on a broadcast -- when sound may happen on the broadcast as well. Even simultaneously.
>
> so what!
Having clarified that, we can return to the question I asked you: To
what extent do you find it relevant how someone looks on an
entertainment "show" (bearing in mind that sound may happen on the
broadcast as well) ?
> > Or did the advertisers pay Mr Ross for his appearance based solely on his looks?
>
> American television likes to bring miserable people together for the masses to gawk out is my theory. Must be some money in it. I can tell you have never worked in TV
Thanks for those insights. Did the advertisers pay Mr Ross for his
appearance based solely on his looks?
> > So that relates to my question about the name of the team which you have identified. Reductio ad teamum - with the ~educational~~possibilities~ of broadcast video squandered...
>
> So what. Who cares about this besides you?
I don't know who else cares. Hence my pitiful gratitude when you deign
to show enough care to reply to my humble posts.
> > I have a mentor? When did that happen? I'll acquire a ~coach~ next -- all unwittingly...
>
> Happened when it happened. Or it didn't.
Hmm -- some doubt now about whether I really do have a mentor... yet
you seemed so positive previously in identify my alleged "mentor rick
ross" ...