Nordstrop, What Would You Like To Discuss?

[Tom Jones]

Please feel free to start an original not stolen discussion and that
does not reek of your earlier interrogation points and if you would
spell out any rules you would like like that discussion to have or
not have.

[Serena Nordstrup]

On Feb 13, 5:16 am, Tom Jones <tomtomztroub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please feel free to start an original not stolen discussion

Why, thank you. Just like Usenet, huh?

> and that
> does not reek of your earlier interrogation points

I regard questioning as intrinsic to discussion (as opposed to
gossip). Some people may even object to agreement-parties...

> and if you would
> spell out any  rules you would like like that discussion to have or
> not have.

Conventions might emerge.

[Tom Jones]

> I regard questioning as intrinsic to discussion (as opposed to
> gossip). Some people may even object to agreement-parties...

Given that, and regurgitation of your questions you have already
asked and rehash of old gobbledygook aside, what would you be
willing discuss that has not yet already been asked about nor
discussed in alt.fan.landmark? What fresh questions or fresh
assertions would you like to discuss with those who visit
alt.fan.landmark?

[Serena Nordstrup]

Regardless of alleged regurgitation and of alleged rehashing of
alleged gobbledygook, I suspect a lack of interest (in the ~past~) in
(for example) the sociology of proselytization.