On Apr 14, 12:14 am, TJ <
thetroublewitht...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Nordstup? -- Sorry, my command of Norwegian doesn't extend to "Nordstup".
>
> Just suck it bro. or "N-o-r-d-s-t-r-u-p" as you call yourself.
>
> > > just messing with you you bro ;)
>
> > Does this mean that we cannot rely on your ~word~ ?
>
> Who is this "we" you speak of bro? And which "word" are you asking about dude? All the words I use are in the dictionary. Do you "rely" in the words in the english language? If yes then yes if no then no, if sometimes yes and sometimes no than sometimes yes and sometimes no.
You reveal the hollowness of rosenbergist jargon (~word~) so
thoroughly!
> > "Nordstrop" ... "Nordstup" -- you have me confused more than ever...
>
> "N-o-r-d-s-t-r-u-p", does that help? Or does your confusion run deeper?
Much deeper. You have an impression of a an ~interperetation~ of the
identity of the persona(s) of Nordstrop/Nordstup/Nordstrop. Does this
have some connection with a discussion-group about so-called
~landmark~ so-called ~education~? If so, how?
> > By-passing the rope-pissing on this occasion, I find you wrote: "[...] the critics at alt.fan.landmark think Transformation was obligated to be an anti-Erhard film or of course it was a "puff piece", "an infomercial" etc blah blah blah. As Nordstrop put it: "Refreshingly one-sided or refreshingly simplistick". Everyone must agree with you true believers or they are uninformed apologists who do not have a clue." Hence my question, which I now re-pose: Does the work of this mysterious Nordstrop/Nordstup in some way advocate totalism?
> > Simpatice
>
> > Serena
>
> Now that we have cleared that up and established that Nordstrop/Nordstup is really N-o-r-d-s-t-r-u-p, you tell me. Or not, no pressure.
I don't see any advocacy of totalism, but you appeared to make the
suggestion: '[...] the critics at alt.fan.landmark think
Transformation was obligated to be an anti-Erhard film or of course it
was a "puff piece", "an infomercial" etc blah blah blah. As Nordstrop
put it: "Refreshingly one-sided or refreshingly simplistick". Everyone
must agree with you true believers or they are uninformed apologists
who do not have a clue.' Hence my question directed to yourself: Does
the work of Nordstrop/Nordstup/Nordstrup in some way advocate
totalism?
Simpatice
Serena