Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Fraud Cherry Continues......(Was Re: Of The Political Will.....Blah, Blah, Blah)

View parsed - Show only message text

From: jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Subject: Re: Fraud Cherry Continues......(Was Re: Of The Political Will.....Blah, Blah, Blah)
Date: 1998/08/27
Message-ID: <EyCqCC.Mys@world.std.com>
X-Deja-AN: 385280917
References: <35D3C64F.E05@up.holst.ery> <35d92afc.13277508@nntp.sj.bigger.net> <Exzyxw.DxI@world.std.com> <6ro3bh$9uhq$1@newssvr04-int.news.prodigy.com> <Ey4y3J.3C8@world.std.com> <6rpuah$drf0$1@newssvr04-int.news.prodigy.com>
Organization: The World, Public Access Internet, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality,soc.motss,demon.local,alt.fan.karl-malden.nose,news.admin.censorship,soc.culture.cuba,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.support.crossposting




In Message-ID: <6rpuah$drf...@newssvr04-int.news.prodigy.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality,soc.motss,demon.local,
alt.fan.karl-malden.nose,news.admin.censorship,soc.culture.cuba,
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.support.crossposting
Subject: Re: Fraud Cherry Continues......
(Was Re: Of The Political Will.....Blah, Blah, Blah)
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 16:33:36 -0400
"robbie_c" <bdcph...@prodigy.net> wrote:


> The sick, pathetic, gay hating Fraud Cherry droned on in message ...

Can't you homos ever post anything about me without a mass of ad-hominem
attacks? Don't any of you know how to engage in civilized discourse?

Also, what was the big idea of splitting this thread off from the main
thread and referring to me as "Fraud Cherry"? My post was made in Ezekiel
Krahlin's thread, and that's where your response should have gone.

> >"robbie_c" <bdcph...@prodigy.net> writes:
> >
> >>This statement is a bald-faced lie.  You have been told repeatedly that
> JTEM
> >>attacks you because of your pathologic hatred of gay people and your
> >>well-documented crossposting abuses.
> >

Of course I have been "told repeatedly." You homos just keep repeating the
same lie.

> >NAMBLA spams and when NAMBLA spams, I crosspost. Why is it that all you
> >homos complain about my crossposting, and refrain from complaining about
> >NAMBLA's spamming?

> What newsgroups is NAMBLA spamming? I haven't seen a post from a NAMBLA
> member in weeks.

That is correct. The reason you haven't seen a post from a NAMBLA spokesman
is that one of the two official NAMBLA spokesmen, Roy Radow, has been
arrested and charged with homosexual child-molesting. I saw that news in
the New York Post. As for falcor14, the other official NAMBLA spokesman,
who knows? Something must have happened to him.

Radow's lawyer has undoubtedly advised Radow to not post anything on Usenet
if he wants to beat the rap. Homosexual child-molesters are always beating
the rap. Michael Jackson beat the rap. Bruce Ritter, the Roman Catholic
priest who founded Covenant House as a shelter for runaway youth, was later
found to be engaging in homosexual child-molesting with the very youths he
was supposed to be protecting. HE beat the rap. This is the SAME Bruce
Ritter who was one of the Commissioners of the Meese Commission on
Obscenity and Pornography. In other words, a homosexual child-molester was
given a United States government platform to pontificate on the evils of,
for example, magazines such as Playboy and Penthouse.

Let's get back to the original point. You complain about my "crossposting
abuses." All I can say is that you homos have a strange set of values. You
consider crossposting to be a worse evil than homosexual child-molesting.

> And anyway, you crosspost articles that have 'no' references to NAMBLA.

Sure I do. I learned the art of crossposting almost four years ago from Rod
Swift, a homonazi NAMBLA supporter.

> >
> >JTEM is one of the worst bald-faced liars on Usenet right now. He has
> >accused me of racism. Every time I ask him to produce evidence for this
> >bald-faced lie, all he does is post more demands that my ISP terminate me
> >with extreme prejudice.
>
> Please repost the article where John accused you of racism. Also include
> your article that prompted the response.
>

"Article"? What do you mean, "article"? There have been whole threads
accusing me of racism. Anyway, here is the article:

---------------------------------snip----------------------------------

From: j...@tiac.net (JTEM)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.politics.homosexuality,
soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.jewish,alt.censorship
Subject: Get rid of fred cherry
Followup-To: alt.politics.homosexuality
Date: 24 May 1998 02:53:10 GMT
Organization: The Internet Access Company, Inc.
Lines: 34
Messag -ID: <6k822m$...@news-central.tiac.net>
References: <6jg829$9p...@ambach.macc.wisc.edu> <EtF80C....@world.std.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sunspot.tiac.net

Fred Cherry <jo...@world.std.com> wrote:
    [nothing]


You can do it. You have the power to get rid of fred cherry. Write to his
ISP:

ab...@world.std.com  bill...@world.std.com  b...@world.std.com

   netad...@world.std.com  postmas...@world.std.com  r...@world.std.com

st...@world.std.com  supp...@world.std.com  webmas...@world.std.com

Forward his articles to *ALL* the address above. Not one of them, not some
of them, ALL OF THEM. Send a seperate e-mail if you have to, just do it.
If your newsgroup has a charter or FAQ, forward that along too. Do it.

Fred cherry will keep bringing his racist, sexist & homophobic garbage
into your newsgroup. He will not stop. His ISP has granted him free
license to spam but, as much as they support spammers, they'll have no
choice but to pay attention to the volume.

There won't be a "volume" unless you complain.

You can do something about it or you can just sit there and take it.
Aren't you sick of taking it yet? Isn't there enough in your life already
that you're forced to take? Don't you want an opportunity to fight back
and win?

Here it is.

    John
--
J...@SUNSPOT.TIAC.NET

-------------------------------snip---------------------------------


> >>NAMBLA has nothing to do with JTEM's attacks on you.
> >
> >>You only use NAMBLA as a convenient strawman to justify your insane
> >>hatred of gay people. I have pointed this out over and over again, as
> >>have many others. And we will continue to speak the truth in the face
> >>of your never-ending lies.
> >

You homos outnumber me, and you have the volume to support YOUR version of
the truth. I have the record, which supports MY version of the truth.

> >My hatred for homos is completely justified. You homos have a hatred for
> >people like me on the basis that we patronize prostitutes.
>
> This is utter crap. If some gays disapprove of prostitution, then your
> twisted logic says 'all' gays hate 'all' people who patronize
> prostitutes.

Quit trying to twist my words in order to justify your hatred and bigotry.
Perhaps I should have said "homos similar to you", because it is clear that
the overwhelming majority of homos hate heterosexual men who patronize
women prostitutes.

On the other hand, there are some prominent gay people who support
decriminalization of prostitution. Among them are: Camille Paglia, Pat
Califia, John Rechy, and Quentin Crisp.

> Do you have any idea how moronic you sound when you make leaps of logic
> like this. You can't possibly know, or you wouldn't do it.

Again with your homo-style ad-hominem attack.

> And, in any event, the issue of prostitution has 'nothing' to do with
> NAMBLA.

As a matter of fact, it does. NAMBLA spokesmen have recommended a book of
fiction in which a homosexual child-molester commits an act of mutilation
upon the genitals of a woman prostitute.

> >
> >>You, personally,  have done more to keep NAMBLA's name alive in these
> >>newsgroups than has any member of that group. You ought to be on their
> >>payroll as a public relations flak.

Did you ever hear of Ralph Nader's book: "Unsafe At Any Speed"? Nader, in
his book, pointed out that certain automobiles are death-traps. Using YOUR
logic, you would say that Nader ought to be on the payroll of the
automobile companies as a public relations flak.

> >
> >The FAQ of soc.motss, which is the largest homo newsgroup on Usenet,
> >gives NAMBLA a free plug.
>
> Here is the so-called 'free plug'
>
> L.8 NAMBLA
>  The North American Man-Boy Love Association "support[s] men and boys in
> consensual relationships with one another and help[s] educate society
> about the nature of such relationships," according to a posting by one of
> its members. For info: NAMBLA Info, Dept RR, P.O.Box 174, Midtown
> Station, NYC NY 10018, or email ra...@netcom.com. Discussion of NAMBLA's
> goals via postings to soc.motss and in the LGBTO community often stirs
> sharp controversy. More information is available on the QRD.
>
> This description appears in the Appendix to the FAQ.

> I maintain that 'you' have given NAMBLA more 'free plugs' than anyone in
> a.p.h. or soc.motss.
>
> >>Perhaps you already are. That would explain why you don't post your
> >>diatribes in the pedophile newsgroups. Hmmm? How about it?
> >
> >NAMBLA doesn't post in the pedophile newsgroups.
>
> So you have no problem with pedophilia per se. You simply zero in on
> NAMBLA because you perceive it to be a gay organization (it is not, and
> has not been for many, many years now).

NAMBLA certainly isn't a straight organization.

Furthermore, if the spokespersons for heterosexual child-molesting ever got
out of their cage and started posting propaganda in favor of heterosexual
child-molesting all over Usenet, I would flame them just as I have flamed
NAMBLA.

> The truth always eventually comes out.

Indeed it does.

> >
> >>P.S. JTEM and Zeke are buddies? Hah! I don't think so!
> >
> >They certainly are buddies in their joint efforts to get my ISP to
> >terminate me with extreme prejudice.
> >
> So they agree on one thing. This makes them 'buddies?' Oh, brother!

Oh, sister!

> >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>From childhood's hour I have not been
> >>As others were---I have not seen
> >>As others saw---I could not bring
> >>My passions from a common spring.
> >
> >>------Edgar Allan Poe   "Alone"
> >
> >Quit trying to make it appear as if Edgar Allen Poe were a homo. Post
> >the entire poem, and that will make it clear that Poe certainly was NOT
> >a homo.
> >
> I've already explained this to you. I won't do it again. Your dementia is
> getting worse. You are now truly 'barren of grey matter.'

We DID discuss this previously, but at the time I was not aware that you
had done one of your homo-style snippings to make something appear to be
what it is not. Again, I say. Post the entire poem.

--
----
Robbie---------------------(bruce_c)         bdcph...@epic.prodigy.net
http://members.wbs.net/homepages/n/y/c/nycrobbie.html
[Legitimate e-mailers: remove 'epic' from my address]

Okay, I have removed 'epic' from your address. Are you happy now?


jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)




Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google